||Page Revised: April 20, 2013
|Ongoing improvements in
presentation, inclusion of additional material and new links to and from pages / other
T [*Link from here to assured EU protection provisions]
- ACCESS from here the englishlaw.htm
- consider the above headline *Law Report*.
- Join others on Line - and
- contact us if you wish to join in a class action [*Link from here to RIGHTS
assured to individuals / to citizens of EU member States]
- against Public Servants
- who negate in their duties and
- fail to protect the citizens / >us< from
- the rampant fraud ongoing in and through
- the Courts and
- Legal Services area imposed on the taxpayers. firstname.lastname@example.org
- NOW - October 2004 consider the arrogant denial of rights in
contempt of ALL LAW, as stipulated in the words below:
"The court has inherent jurisdiction to stay an action which must fail; as,
for instance an action brought in respect of an act of State"
The implications & developments clear, below. Funding from the European Parliament in order to challenge
wrongs imposed by 'local / state governments'. It is for the victims who had been in
contact with us & for the charlatans and stooges that we are exposing as 'maintenance
engineers* [*L]' of the constructive frauds THROUGH
the courts and the legal circles organised, arranged and imposed on Mr & Mrs Average
>the taxpayers at large< to reconsider their vile & evil activities against us
while in pursuit of the thirty pieces of silver 'through the second constructive frauds,
on the taxpayers', which we cover and expose in the explicit web-page /confraud.htm. It is for local / state governments
to consider the rights of the citizens AS COVERED under Article 29*[*L] of 'the combined treaties of the EU.
the new development THROUGH
THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT, as reported by 'The Independent' on May 11th, 2005. We await for
'the developments in the United Kingdom' in respect of the rampant fraud and corruption
THROUGH the courts. We keep in mind the Prime Minister's declaration at the end of last
year's New Labour Party Conference (2004). His undertaking / promise was that the next
government he leads is to create a land of opportunity, as opposed to the land of IMPOSED
DEPENDENCY. The afore stated states care of the criminals who are retained as Public
Servants who expect of and rely on 'the judiciary'*[*L]
to create, organise and manage all state facilities, through contempt of all of
Parliament's Law*. [*Link from here to the state a family was driven to, when
the banks and solicitors took over]
|Additional information as to
THE RIGHTS OF E.U CITIZENS: -
On The nature of Community Law : direct effect.
(From Cases & Material on EC Law by
Stephen Weatherill [*Link from here to images from pages & extracts]
"It following from the foregoing
considerations that, according to the spirit, the general scheme and the wording of the
Treaty, Article 12 must be interpreted as producing direct effects and creating individual
rights which national courts must protect".
"The second question asks the Courts to say whether Council Directive No. 64/221 of
February 1964 on the co-ordination of special measures concerning the movement and
residence of foreign nationals which are justified on grounds of public policy, public
security or public health is directly applicable so as to confer on individuals rights
enforceable by them in the courts of a Member State.
of provisions under the European Court of Human Rights RECORDS FOR & IN THE PUBLIC
DOMAIN [*Link to left margin column in page]
Page Changes 24 August 2012
||Your RIGHTS - In Law *Page created
the Community On Line and publish your Statement of Facts
case at the European Court on Human Rights - paves the way) and
the Evidence you have. Use your rights in law [*link]
and ACT, as / or with others, against the offenders.
Join them and chip in for the creation of the mass of evidence against the abductors and
rapists of Justice. You can then benefit from THE FACTS and evidence that you will help
establish. It can all be used in any action, s severally or jointly with others, as the
case may be . Crimes against humanity are not ruled out when
a large number of citizens can come up with evidence and as victims concur and or expand
the FACTS STATED & The VIOLATIONS PLEADED as LODGED at the ECoHR, already.
Read the Statement of facts / Legal Argument by and for the Chairman of
live beat dads uk.org. Do
not fail to note the rights pleaded (par. 5.a & 5.b) in the
case of a relationship gone astray, merely because the other side felt the urge and need
for a change of partner. Thereafter ONE & ALL decided to use the innocent children as
the vehicle for use in and for the conversion of assets industries, a division of CIUKU Enterprises!
We invite you to take part
in DATA collection in the areas covered by The CAMILA Project.
Your own contributions are and will be of value to all victims who are active now & to
all others who, like you we hope, will be challenging the offenders by using the rights we
point to, assured in law.
Announcement- July 2002
1. Court Proceedings ARE
2. Beware of
Mischief Makers operating as and or for the Divide & Rule Brigade. Do not be misled by self- appointed 'gurus' such as
we cover in the explicit pages /2lipstalk.htm
& /chaldep1.htm who aim to serve the Fraudsters Club as in /confraud.htm (the page) either from within or as
guided (by the abductors and rapists of Justice) mischief makers / recruits. Such persons
come up with all sorts of poor excuses, as to why victims ought not to act as their rights
in law provide. (Link)
Article 29 (of the
Combined Treaties of the European Union) provides for protection FROM FRAUD &
|Violations Pleaded - List
1. First Protocol Article 1 - CoL
member now lodged & In Housing Benefit
Constructive Frauds, in 1997. (Link)
2. Article 8. Challenging the use of innocent children by the legal
circles and Social Workers for the Conversion of assets by scavengers &
Court Proceedings ARE PUBLIC RECORDS and
for free access to and by the citizens.
1. Modern day Lords and Masters, as dictators impose
on the citizens illegal acts of their own or endorse such acts by
the circles from within which they arose to public office....
2. Published as the law commands because of the crimes perpetrated and the public interest element, the media
merited attention and wasted our time
with intent because of secret briefings they were party to as...Link
4. The citizens need to be
informed of Organised, state approved CRIME / FRAUD.
parents own religious & philosophical convictions in teaching... children".
6. Rights and
Obligations, Hearings and Judgements IN
PUBLIC and above ALL in the interest of MORALS
7. part 7
"Where Deceit was practised by
an intentional wrongdoer he was liable for the actual damages which directly flowed from
the fraudulent inducement without reference to the transaction date or any other date, and
foreseeability of such damages was irrelevant".
does not imply independence from the restraints of LAW as our Law Enforcement Agencies/
Public Servants assert and promote. The dictum "NONE ABOVE THE LAW applies to one and
all from within any state. (*Link to arrangements in place that ESTABLISH FRAUDULENT
INTENT BY Judicial chair occupants. Yet they have the audacity to promote / use
'impartiality' of the judiciary. The arrogance care of Intellectual
Prostitutes that John Swainton spoke of when he was moving out of the firing line).
D2. part 2
A councillor who ignored
the submissions his staff received 3 years earlier all of a sudden came out of the woods
to address the press with the facts HE HAD SHOVED IN THE FAMILY CLOSET - an accessory
during and after the commission of crimes he spoke of to the press, he admitted the
Visit the page and decide after you
look at the Forgeries which Council staff used for the promotion of the thefts and
misappropriation of the stolen funds they all indulge in as part of CIUKU Enterprises.
1 of an Appeal challenging violations by judicial chair occupants
Visit the relevant page and read at least the first three pages and the last three.
Then if you wish to, download and print it all. Get to know of the criminal activities
many public servants indulge in, including judicial chair occupants. Use such facts, as
FRAUD on the Social Security budget and on targeted citizens, LIKE ALL OTHER VICTIMS of
the TRIAD and help create the mass of evidence we seek in order that the victims of the
TRIAD can act both severally and jointly as national and international law provides.
PUBLIC RECORDS and the European Court of Human Rights - Principle.
Many a planted mischief maker
obstruct and hinder victim-citizens from exposing on the Internet, to the World Wide
Jury, the activities of the TRIAD. Read the words below, that are as clear as can be on
the issue of ACCESS TO RECORDS BY THE PUBLIC. From no lesser an authority than the
European Court on Human Rights: "If you do not wish your identity
to be disclosed to the public, you must say so and set out the reasons for such departure
from the normal rule of public access to information in the proceedings. The court
may authorise anonymity in exceptional and duly justified cases". We ask the
stooges / all planted mischief makers, a simple question: "SINCE WHEN has Article 6
been amended and allegations SUPPORTED BY EVIDENCE are matters for the criminals, alone,
to know of when purporting to deal with the issues in the theatres of abducted
Justice? Unless they come up with such provisions, they should go back to the law
school they graduated from or get their professors / tutors to deal with this simple task
||Page Revised: April 20, 2013 : ADDED
*Links from page to EU rights enforceable by
individuals and link to JusticeRaped
|Site under reconstruction for better navigation; ongoing improvements and
additional material in pages & new pages.
- Human Rights Articles
covered / published as of July 1998. European Union Law and page in its present context
introduced in December 2001.
- Individual victims informed of their rights
as of late 1999 / early 2000.
- The leaders of LIPS [*Link] and individual members were informed of their
rights as of February 1997.
- At the time a number received, by post, an
explicit invitation; they were asked to look up our pages and material; also to co-operate
by returning a simple to complete (both sides of) an A4 questionnaire (ticks only needed)
and to return the form to The CAMILA Project. However, no one complied.
- We wish to qualify, however, that three
individuals had been co-operating in other issues, from earlier times.
- Also Mr Geoffrey Harold Scriven (with whom
we had an excellent relationship between March 1999 until late December 1999), Mr Norman
Scarth, Mr Paul Talbot-Jenkins [*Link]
and Mr Maurice Kellett from even earlier times, were acting only as mischief makers [*Link].
- All were introduced or told to contact us
from the LIPS crowd/mob quarters.
- The plans of the leaders of 'the group' were
otherwise motivated than 'the complaints they were/are promoting and asserting'.
- All raise issues about the system in place';
all agree 'in private with us' that the unholy trinity, the TRIAD [*Link] instigates and maintains the system as is 'with and
through public servants', with the blessings of such persons as the LIPS crowd/mob
leaders/managers organise and control in tandem with their affiliates and associates who
operate out of similar set-ups. [*Link
from here to explicit references to such groups by a
solicitor to client in March 2003].
- Such persons are simply acting as
maintenance engineers and they are running around promoting and working FOR the
administration of the rampant fraud and corruption of society through abuse of the courts
processes and facilities. [*Link from here to the evidence that taxpayers foot the cost].
here "The Convention In Legal Terms* as defined by three
European Union Law
>Specifically provides for the European Convention On Human Rights to be implemented and in force in all
States of the European Union)
|The European Convention
on Human Rights (ECoHR) under Article 1 of the First
Protocol Provides for the abusive use of any facilities
that violate principles of INTERNATIONAL LAW. Through violations of this article the
conversion of the assets (properties) of the victim-citizens, to allegedly legitimate legal costs. Public Servants,
retained on behalf of the citizens by other Public Servants, indulge. Through arranged, as
discretionary powers, the corrupt and the corrupters breach and violate the following
provision:- " Every natural or legal person is entitled to the peaceful enjoyment of HIS
possessions. NO ONE shall be deprived of his possessions except in the public interest and
SUBJECT to the conditions provided for by law AND BY THE GENERAL PRINCIPLES of
INTERNATIONAL LAW." and "The preceding
provisions shall not, however, in any way impair the right of a State to enforce such laws
as it deems necessary to control the use of property in accordance with the general
interest or to secure the payment of taxes and or other contributions or penalties". Back to: CICA
Local Authorities (Pleaded by member of the CoL)
"The Paul Talbot-Jenkins - case,
"The Maurice Kellett - case",
"The Baldwin De Castilo - case", "The William Spring - case",
"The Jim Hulbert - case", "The Builder's - case" and the many other
cases that we provide links to, in and through our pages.
"The Robert Owen - case"
(lodged at the ECrtHR as of last year),
"The Geoffrey Harold Scriven-
divorce"(Link to in our pages, part of the early challenges), "The Johan Foenander
- divorce" (an Appeal in our
pages), "The Bryan Hudson - divorce" and "The "Norman Scarth - case", all
four gone underground cases as with,
"The Roz Kellett - case" who removed her extensive complaints and
Statements of Fact from her pages & web-sites following contacts by the Litigants In
Person Society; individuals from within the LIPS crowd/mob always in the background,
interfering in our work, without any consultation and or reference to us. Her Statement of
Facts supported with comprehensive evidence, she was encouraged, by us, to publish on the
Internet, as we encouraged Mr Jim Hulbert to do. Citizens can put an end to all maligned
comments from third parties, from persons who used to, and still, relish in vile opinions
on the issue of corrupted and perverted justice by the TRIAD, in control of Law
Enforcement in our alleged Democracy. We have been inviting the maligned mischief makers
to access the */confraud.htm* file/page and to
publish their views on 'The Rampant Fraud' through the court service and legal system. We
dare anyone to ignore the facts and the realities covered in the aforesaid page and to
consider the elements that arose out of the conduct of another LIPS introduction we caught
in bed with those she was complaining about for over 15 months. All the while she was
promoting and making many a false assertion about her intentions, and securing assistance
as a result of fraudulent in intent misrepresentations to us.(Link)
In "The Mary Winch" (case reported
by Marie Claire and covered also in two TV documentaries). Also in "The Gerald
Adshed" case (stated as a precedent case in the Divorce Appeal case (Link)) both persons were driven to an early death,
like many others.
Special mention to
persons who contacted us at the directions of others. They merited attention and benefited
from work done such as the Divorce Appeal in our pages no one can ignore. Abusing our
time, as mischief makers with other agendas, which facts, the transcript we publish in our
pages evinces (Link). They, who elected to ignore "OUR AIMS" and 'engaged in undisclosed arrangements with others' will be afforded the rights and
opportunities covered in the aforesaid page. More details we shall provide in due course.
Some of the work is already published, as agreed or as our rights (copyright) and as the
law commands because of the crimes perpetrated and the public
The public at
large, the citizens of the world, need to be informed and protected from Organised
Institutionalised State Approved/Endorsed Crime,
through politicians who ignore their duties to the citizens. Visitors to these pages
should note and marvel at the capabilities of those who systematically misuse their public
office in contravention of every principle of law. Through breaches of criminal law and
violations of International Law the offenders Misconduct
in Public office* indictable offences! (No one above the Law? We address the
deputies of the people and the citizens of the world, everywhere).
- NOTES - A:- The above
provision in International Law is the most frequently violated right by public servants in
the United Kingdom. In particular by the Legal/Judicial/Police TRIAD that operates freely
care of the much promoted and revered independence of 'judicial chair occupants'; persons
who act injudiciously as exemplified in "The Downing Street
Years" and in "The Breeding
grounds-case". Also in:
(the very ECoHR ) under Article 2 of the
First Protocol Provides: "NO person shall be denied the
right to education. In the exercise of ANY functions which IT ASSUMES in relation to
education and to TEACHING (this
includes ALL established practices and examples set by public servants and or officials), the State SHALL RESPECT THE RIGHT OF PARENTS (do
note PLURAL) TO ENSURE SUCH EDUCATION AND TEACHING IS IN CONFORMITY WITH THEIR OWN
RELIGIOUS AND PHILOSOPHICAL CONVICTIONS. (i.e:not as imposed and or determined by quangos and or
political animals, WRONGLY MOTIVATED individuals and amoral
atheists. Or by persons who have no respect for the rights and the WILL of the citizens
they choose to treat as morons and or as illiterate serfs of the middle ages and or as
persons, who the impostors believe, follow and practice the very principles of the
IMPOSTORS themselves. Modern day Lords & Masters imposing their DICTATES(Q4) on the citizens in an alleged
Democracy, such as the United Kingdom proclaims itself to be.
Article 2. "Everyone's right to life shall be protected by
law. No one shall be deprived ....." WE MAINTAIN that the
proviso assures citizens of the right to a life WITHIN THE LAW. So long as the citizens do
not infringe upon or violate the rights of any other citizen. No matter how low the
standing of any citizen in the community the right should and must be applied in line with
the dictum: "All men are created/born equal". The right ought never to have been, be or let alone
contemplated by anyone such as the abductors and rapists of Justice and Democracy have
been indulging while 'serving as alleged public servants' only to behave as the absolute
Lords & Masters of the citizens. (© AY 1993). (Pleaded by member of the
Article 3. "No one shall be subjected to torture or to
inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment". WE MAINTAIN that the proviso is grossly breached by the TRIAD
(legal/judicial/police and their stooges) through breaches of and misconduct in public
office, such as the practices by the Rampant Corruption Jockeys in charge and in control
of the courts. (Pleaded by member of the
5. "Everyone has
the right to liberty and security of person. No one shall be deprived of his liberty save
in the following cases and in accordance with a procedure prescribed by law. (Link to Convention site). HOWEVER
we can assure you that no procedures prescribed by law, that would be in line with
the simple declaration under the introduction to the article, AUTHORISE the abduction
of the life of victims of the legal(1), judicial(2), police(3) = TRIAD. ??????,
the Greek word (TPIADA), covers the Holy and not the unholy trinity that is in control of
our country. In the UK, citizens, on a regular basis, are led in the beehives where the
legal circles thrive, as in 'The Breeding Grounds - case. Citizens are forced and or
caused to take up issue with the fraudsters, the corrupt and the corrupted who flourish
unhindered and unchallenged. Citizens DO HAVE THEIR LIBERTY STOLEN from them through such
impositions. The RIGHTS of the citizen, as provided for under this Article, ARE VIOLATED.
Citizens are deprived of the 'right to lead a life as they have the right to plan for in a
free democracy'. The citizens although not serfs, nonetheless are FORCED TO LABOUR OVER
LEGAL MATTERS. They SLAVE over papers and FIGHT in the courts FOR THE RIGHTS DEPRIVED OF
THEM BY THOSE WHO TARGET THE CITIZEN'S who created and own properties (including peace of
mind). The citizens' properties are stolen through the activities that members of the
Community On Line members COLLECTIVELY cover, as in our pages. The criminals who flourish
in our society, through control of the 'services' the TRIAD maintains, are challenged to
argue their vile activities and to defend the defaults of the public servants retained in
the circles the TRIAD 'maintains' in an alleged democracy,
allegedly founded and resting on law and order.
"In the determination of
his civil rights and obligations or of any criminal charges against
him, everyone is entitled to a fair and public hearing within a reasonable time by an independent
and impartial tribunals established by law. Judgement shall be pronounced
publicly but the press and public may be excluded from all or part of the trial in the
interests of morals, public order or national security in a democratic society, where the
interests of juveniles or the protection of the private life of the parties so
require, or to the extent strictly necessary in the opinion of the
court in special circumstances where publicity would prejudice the interests of
justice". (For more
relevant sections access the Home Office page. For the
full list access from this page the official ECrtHR web-site).
In the meantime DO NOTE the following: Facts Stated & Violations Pleaded as settled by Mr. Andrew Yiannides for a member of the CoL and submitted to the European Court of
Human Rights can be accessed at this web-site).
" as well as obligations ARE COVERED by this provision.
2. "PUBLIC" as well as fair "HEARINGS" (you can address the court and you ought not to be treated as an
underdog) ARE PROVIDED FOR.
3. "Within REASONABLE TIME ", means without prevarication and no meandering through inexcusable
time-wasting and costs creating theatrical productions that warrant appeal, after appeal,
after appeal. Such activities are created and necessitated because of abuse of the courts'
facilities that include the BLANK CHEQUES INDUSTRY - need to appeal and better still the
need to seek LEAVE TO APPEAL the doomed for dismissal insecure scenarios solidly founded
and resting on WILFUL FRAUD ON THE NAIVE & GULLIBLE SUCKERS, 'the serfs who are called
upon to pay taxes for the salaries of abusers of public office and trust'. Nothing but
fraudulent in intent 'use of the bend it, facilities, with the rules in place'. We
refer to rules that are used by the manipulators who put such facilities 'on call' for the
rampant corruption and fraud to flourish, as in the National Scandal pages we cover.
Read the explicit Appeal that covers FORGERIES used for thefts and reliance on
alleged court orders issued WITHOUT ANY HEARINGS as provided under these provisions, the
alleged orders themselves IF THE OFFENDERS dare produce them, just forgeries, intended for
pecuniary advantage if the targeted victim has no choice but to turn to members of the TRIAD in control of CIUKU
4. "IN THE INTEREST OF MORALS", is covered by the Article. We challenge the
abusers of public office and judicial chair occupants, to a private screening of
"smalljustice" the acclaimed documentary from the USA, and to justify allegedly
legitimate hearings within the context and intended safeguards of the provisions under
this heading. We invite the mothers of sadistically and sexually abused children
everywhere and in particular the mothers who organised themselves under the banner of LASA
(League Against Sadistic Abuse) in the United Kingdom to publish facts and realities and
challenge the abusers of public office who know not the meaning of 'JUDICIOUS, let alone
Article 8. (1). "Everyone has the right to respect
for his private and family life, his home and his correspondence. (2). There shall be no interference by public authority with the
exercise of this right except such as is in accordance with the law and is necessary in a
democratic society in the interests of national security, public safety or the economic
well-being of the country, for the prevention of disorder or crime, for the protection of
health or morals, or for the protection of the rights and freedoms of others. (Pleaded for the member of the CoL)
Article 9. "EVERYONE
has the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion..." (*F)
10. "EVERYONE has the right to FREEDOM OF
EXPRESSION....to HOLD OPINIONS...TO RECEIVE AND IMPART INFORMATION AND IDEAS without
interference by public authority and regardless of frontiers..... (with provisions
attached to) maintaining the authority AND IMPARTIALITY(*D1)
of the judiciary".
has the right to freedom of peaceful assembly and to freedom of ASSOCIATION with
others.... rights to form and join ... for the protection of HIS INTERESTS".
Article 11.2. "NO
RESTRICTIONS shall be placed on the exercise of these rights other than such as are
prescribed by law and are necessary in a democratic society in the interests of national
security or public safety, for the prevention of disorder or crime, for the
protection of health or morals or for the protection of the rights and freedoms of others.
This article shall not prevent the imposition of lawful restrictions on the exercise of
these rights by members of the armed forces, of the police or of the administration of the
Article 13. "EVERYONE
whose rights and freedoms as set forth in this Convention are violated SHALL have an
effective remedy before a national authority notwithstanding that the violation HAS BEEN
committed by persons acting in an OFFICIAL CAPACITY." (Pleaded by member of the CoL)
13 is VERY CLEAR. WHERE IS THE
NATIONAL AUTHORITY THAT LOOKS INTO THE VIOLATIONS judges in the United Kingdom endorse,
entertain AND INSTIGATE of their own? The question is simple and the Lord
Chancellor with the Home Secretary should co-operate and produce the formula under which
the citizens CAN challenge activities that blatantly breach national law and VIOLATE Human
Rights. NOTE PLEASE:
We have on record a high court case where the Judge made an issue of the serious ERROR of
judgements (practices in our view) by the Local Government Ombudsman. All is not as the
public is told; the multitude of documented facts we publish PROVE SO BEYOND ANY
REASONABLE DOUBT to the average citizen. The citizens demand that they be treated no more
as illiterate serfs of the middle ages and or as subjects to the whims and or
the abusive dishonesty of so called 'public servants'; the 'alleged servants of the
public' who serve other ulterior motives*, which they fail to declare.
Article 14 provides that: "The enjoyment of the rights and freedoms .... shall be
secured without discrimination on any grounds such as sex, race, colour, language,
religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, association with a
national minority, property, birth or other status". (Pleaded by member of the CoL in submissions to the ECoHR)
Article 34 provides for Individual applications: Chart
of Declarations under former Articles 25 and 46 of the ECHR "The Court may receive applications from any person, non-governmental
organisation or group of individuals claiming to be victim of a violation by one of the
High Contracting Parties of the rights set forth in the Convention or the protocols
thereto. The High Contracting Parties undertake not to hinder in any way the
effective exercise of this right. [An
OPEN CHALLENGE directed to ALL of the charlatans and
fraudsters-club-recruits who are running around promoting and selling (to the naive
and gullible tax-paying suckers) such letters as the letter we refer to in a direct
challenge [*Link from here to the challenge] to the European Court of Human Rights, to publish the rubbish
(which they use and promote) in the public domain. We ask also that they forward to us
copies of such letters from the ECrtHR), for obvious reasons. Such persons apparently,
if not familiar with the provisions / arrangements we point to in our exclusive page* [*Link], simply shoved the provisions in the dark corners
of THEIR CORRUPTED MINDS].
29 of the Combined treaties, of the EU, provides
(for protection from Fraud & Corruption):
"Without prejudice to the powers
of the European Community, the Union's Objective shall be to provide citizens with a high
level of safety within an area of freedom, security and justice by developing common
action among Member States in the fields of police and judicial co-operation in criminal
matters and by preventing and combating racism and xenophobia.
That objective shall be achieved by
preventing and combating crime, organised or otherwise in particular terrorism,
trafficking in persons and offences against children, illicit drug trafficking and illicit
arms trafficking, corruption and fraud through: [*Link to rights assured to
individual citizens & to rights under tort for state breaches]
The Article further
on specifies Treaty Articles and provisions for the essential co-operation between the
Member States. The provisions indeed are great on paper. The capabilities and readiness of
the Authorities to apply the law to known and reported crimes IS AT ISSUE, however, in our
country. As we state in our pages (bearing in mind Article 11.2 of the ECoHR) National Security is NOT AT RISK BUT NATIONAL DISGRACE IS (Link), when one considers the practices of
the criminals who control it all and those who are in Authority in our country.
It is time for New Labour to act and to deliver Justice to the British people before
dabbling in the internal affairs of other countries; any 'duties' to sort the affairs of
the citizens in other countries fall squarely on the shoulders of those in authority in
the relevant countries and on the shoulders of their citizens who should exercise their
rights as Unadulterated Democratic rules and government should provide in accordance with
our founder's proclamation and definition of TRUE DEMOCRACY, and not as promoted by the
media barons and the criminals in control of pseudo-democracies.
WE HAVE BEEN AND ARE MOST CONCERNED because of the Defaults and
Omissions by and from within our Law Enforcement Agencies. The 'alleged
incompetence of the managers/controllers of it all, never ceases to amaze us'. Whether participating or not, the indifferent
to the crimes that Law Enforcement Agents/Professionals fail to act upon and prosecute
reflects adversely on a government that retains and maintains such persons in public
office. When protection is non existent and victims are further victimised by members of
the Law Enforcement Agencies the state can no longer maintain any pretence of law and
order foundations; any assertions to such 'virtues' are but 'a fabricated dream' for sale
to the naive and gullible, not to mention the deliberately starved, of truths and
realities, electorate care of the media barons and their stooges.
appear to relish in Institutionalised Crime, as Organisers and Promoters through
their alleged inability to even prosecute criminals who use FALSE INSTRUMENTS and blunt
FORGERIES in the p[lanned-for expansion of CIUKU Enterprises. Sufficient evidence is
published in our pages covering the realities suppressed by the media barons and ignored
by the promoters of CIUKU. The criminals who default to
prosecute their 'brethren in arms' and those who maintain them in office, as in the
Haringey page and associated pages we cover, are typical examples. Citizens ARE coming
forward, despite the maligned activities of ill motivated and self proclaimed challengers
and exponents of institutionalised crimes. The hypocrites and sycophants: a perfect
example can be found in the 2 LIPS talk page (link)
ignored our rights as the European Convention and the Universal Declaration afford decent
citizens who refuse to join them and their masters and lords in the promotion of and
perpetuation of the CIUKU Enterprises.
OUR AIMS were made clear as of 1981 (The CAMILA Project). Others
have since joined in THE DEMAND to have all court hearings and proceedings
recorded with automatic copies (as provided by law under the Police and Criminal
Evidence Act 1984) to the parties in ALL instances. IT IS TIME to treat all humans as
subject to the very same frailties without discrimination because of assumed 'faultless
and impeccable character'. As our Judges often declare NONE IS ABOVE THE LAW. NONE
should be exempt. There were/are prosecutions in the USA ....... that IS
Democracy, 'The LAW' in action. Not so in our country. The Independence of the
judiciary a vehicle for many a theft of rights through false instruments issued by abusers
of public office.
Here in the United Kingdom our government interrupted/stopped the trial
of a judge who indulged in downright fraud on financial institutions. For decades, as our
founder knows of, our judiciary systematically absolve the financial institutions and the
legal professions of similar and worse crimes. Fraud is rampant and forgeries the
favourite tools for transfer and thefts, endorsed and promoted by the very persons who are
retained to protect society from crime.
far the worst offenders are members of the legal circles and the judiciary; the last
relying on the police to ignore the crimes they endorse while the Minister, accountable
for the judiciary and the Court Service, the Lord Chancellor, through juniors in his
office appears to acquiesce it all with blunt impunity and reckless abandon to the whims
of the dishonest who misconduct in public office.
chair occupants, in the United Kingdom, BREACH THEIR PUBLIC DUTIES and through contempt of
'The Law' and 'The Judicial Oath' they systematically choose to
ignore evidence presented to them. And juniors in the lower courts bluntly ignore the
rulings of Higher Courts and even the provisions of International Law and Treaties that
our government ratified over 50 years ago; illiterates in Law?
dare our leaders assert that we are a Democratic State founded and Resting allegedly on
the rule of Law and Order when judicial chair occupants appear to have carte blanche to
ignore ALL LAW, acting in the process as bandits and or as licensed criminals?
|We recognise that the vast majority of victims in
the UK have suffered from loss of property. Do note that the word covers much more than
the tangible, such as peace of mind, and YOUR time, the right to engage in other gainful
activities instead of chasing after and swimming in the corrupted minefields of our ABUSED
legal system, through the usual manifestations the legal 'boffins' thrive in. In the
circumstances we draw the public's attention to the provision of the ECoHR above, as an
assurance that the law is not an ass. Our founder has maintained, for over forty years,
that an ass is the person who believes such assertions and ILL conceived notions. Further
evidence that the Law is no ass has now been provided by the ruling from the House of
Lords in the farcical Pinochet hearings. Their Lordships determined that the costs in that
case MUST BE MET from public funds because one of their Lordships, sitting in on the case,
FAILED TO DECLARE his connection and interests in Amnesty International. WHAT about the judges failing
to declare their interests AND THEIR PART in the corrupt practices of the legal boffins,
in every case we draw attention to?
you have reasons to believe that your rights HAVE been violated and in particular by and
through abuse of the legal system / courts service COMPLAIN through your Member of
Parliament to the Lord Chancellor's Department. Report also your
complaint and the reasons WHY and HOW to the police. Point out the Court of Appeal ruling /
proclamation we publish under the heading FRAUD VITIATES
JUDGEMENTS*. Link also to, and read the 'Theft and Counterfeit' (forgery)
provisions in The Law* document we publish*. Download it, read
and digest the full scope of the various sections. Consider 'The Law'* in the light of
YOUR own experiences with public servants such as the police and judges who may have
'failed' you. Apply knowledge of facts to 'The Law'* and remember that crime is for the
police to investigate and prosecute. You may e-mail brief details to:< email@example.com
> if you propose to Act by Joining the * human-rights.org * Community On Line *
uncontrolled and unsupervised, in our alleged democracy, ought not to be allowed to
corrode and 'corrupt Britain', trumpeted Paul Johnson *, the foundations of it. Democracy must be seen to be resting and founded on the rule of
2.2 It cannot be allowed to be a monocracy where the
lowest of the low, in any public position, feel free to act outside the law* assured that
along the line others will seek to absolve them through misconduct in public office; if
anything for fear of exposing the depth of the rot in our society the media are aware of
and elect to suppress the realities such as they were pointed to in1972-1975 and ever
since thereafter. [*Access from here the explicit article at www.justiceraped.org/2012/08/a_dedication/
and read of the realities covered and pointed to]
2.3 When the rot is in the foundations nothing but a rebuilt structure
2.4 The architects must either
abandon the old tools of their trade or they must be replaced with persons prepared to
3.1 The provisions ARE CLEAR.
However, if a citizen is subjected to abusive use of official facilities re:- taxes and
other penalties imposed, leading to abuse of the exceptions above provided, the question
arises of HOW FAR and HOW DEEP the organised institutionalised DEPRIVATION AND VIOLATION
3.2 There exist citizens in the
United Kingdom fighting the very issues and the violations of their rights in law*.
4.1 Inevitably power corrupts. Let
loose and free to act outside Parliament's law and the provisions of INTERNATIONAL
LAW. Abuse of the independence of the judiciary principle has been allowed to take
over from the rule of law.
4.2 Misconduct in public office and
violations imposed through alleged legitimate legal costs leading to and followed by
DEPRIVATION OF RIGHTS TO AND PROPERTIES, and no remedy in law because the law exists not
4.3 The Lord Chancellor, as Minister in
charge of the Judiciary, failing to oversee and investigate complaints about the conduct
of 'judicial chair occupants'.
5.1 No facility to comply with the
provisions of Article 13 of the ECoHR.
5.2 No AUTHORITY PROPER TO OVERSEE
AND SUPERVISE the judiciary; therefrom the officially accepted and established rights of
the judiciary to railroad and hijack* court actions as they please or as they are allowed
to 'practice' and or as they are instructed by the state to do.
5.3 The state always absolving itself
on the very grounds of the much revered, promoted from within, and ABUSED 'independence'
of the judiciary 'principle'; the freedom to abuse facility.
5.4 Judiciary who consciously and with
intent misconduct in public office* and enter not into JUDICIOUS rulings founded and
resting on the facts and or the evidence of each case before them but only on what they
choose and can use FOR the benefit of the circles from within which they arose to public
6.1 Judiciary that SIMPLY GENERATE INCOME
and MORE court cases (from appeals to new actions) to which naturally are attached alleged
legitimate legal costs.
6.2 THE ESTABLISHED MILKING OF THE
COW PRACTICE. Graphically depicted in the cartoon that adorns the walls in every
barrister's chambers. The creator of that cartoon failed to place a judge in the
clouds above acting as self appointed GOD stretching out his arms HOLDING IN PLACE the two
litigants who are fighting over the cow being milked dry by the legal professions.
- NOTES - B: - (1) Contributions or penalties
does not include abuse of the court's processes by the dishonest criminals who have free
access to and use of all court facilities at their disposal*. Even on a Saturday,
when the courts are closed, as Mr G H Scriven points out in his affidavit.
The Above: Food for thought for the present United Kingdom government and in
particular the Labour Party as a whole because of the recognition of the state of affairs
ongoing through the abused courts' facilities, as organised by abusers of the trust of the
people, as indulged by persons who operate as legal services providers. Most clear the
promises and undertaking when New Labour were in opposition in 1995; at the time, the
Leader of the Opposition, the Rt. Hon. Tony Blair QC and the Labour Party's Spokes-Person
on Legal Affairs, the Rt. Hon. Paul Boateng, subsequently Minister of State at the Home
Office after New Labour were voted in government, the undertaking and promise to address
and deal with the issue / element of FRAUD IN THE LEGAL SYSTEM.
NOTE: All the while,
throughout, and ever since the acknowledgement from the Opposition, in July 1995, many the
victims and alleged victim-challengers who made it their business to obstruct and
hinder, everyone simply carried on abusing the trust each was allowed to benefit from*[*L] while 'their performance was observed and noted.
In the meantime nothing but the introduction of (each was sending along) new alleged
victim-challengers and aspiring fraudsters-club-recruits / operatives such as the persons
named / listed in the proof of posting cards released in the public domain*[*L] on 27th
November 2007 and in the exclusive / explicit pages .org/corruptcourts.htm
.org/4deceit.htm .org/actors.htm .org/ actors2.htm .org/
|We publish in our pages and we point to a letter
which Andrew Yiannides, the founder of www.human-rights.org
sent to 'The Times' newspaper. IT WAS NOT PUBLISHED by the self appointed CENSOR and
promoter of the ills the society in the United Kingdom is faced with. The editor, and
others, HAVING predetermined WHAT society they ARE CREATING there was and there is no
cause to pretend to know of the rights of parents UNDER INTERNATIONAL LAW.
LINK from here to 'educating children the Politically
Correct way' (by State & Local Authority puppets) and a concerned father's way
when the need arose to challenge the evil and maligned. The father had been prompted to
write to the editor of 'The Times' (the prestigious) because of ongoing concerns regarding
principles and morals in education, in the mid-1990s. In the same page an example of how
the same father 'set about to educate secondary school children' by examples stated, at a
time when the issue of PERSONAL RIGHTS was challenged through a 'case stated, relevant to
family and by extension to the CONSIDERATIONS APPLICABLE TO SOCIETY AS A WHOLE.
Consider the case of the mother [*Link to Summons
issued] of the young lady to whom we have dedicated this web-site [dedication[*L]]. Consider the situation of both the mother
and the young lady. WHO ARE responsible for the ENCOURAGEMENT of the father to violate the
rights of both mother and daughter? WHO ARE STILL TORMENTING AND TORTURING THE
MOTHER? Can one ignore the blatant invitations and contract, by the cruel father of the
young lady, in the underworld for the disposal of the brother of the bereaved mother? WHO
but the police failed the family and friends of Stephen Lawrence in the ongoing saga after
the loss of that life?
CORRUPT BRITAIN!!! trumpeted Paul Johnson in the Daily Mail on
6th November 1998 while the editorial challenged "Time for politicians to tell
the truth", the editor forgetting the role the Media play in disinformation and
misinformation* [*L] while shoving the
facts of life under the carpets and or in the cupboards of their private salons and clubs.
Consider the case of EVERY CITIZEN forced to slave over papers,
Court documents, manuals and research in libraries, SIMPLY BECAUSE THE LEGAL SYSTEM is
fraught with fraud as the NEW LABOUR party when in opposition acknowledged and committed
itself to remedy. Your Lordship (we address the Lord Chancellor)
WHY ARE THE CITIZENS IN THE UNITED KINGDOM FORCED TO COMPULSORY LABOUR by those who abuse
their much revered right to independence and freedom to enter into NON JUDICIOUS
DECISIONS? Do consider also the provisions of the Criminal
Justice Act 1988 to which we have drawn the attention of the Attorney General,
the world and the citizens of these islands. ABOVE all do consider the very
declarations of senior judges who point out, at every opportunity, that "NO ONE IS
ABOVE THE LAW, least of all those who are presumed to know of it before accepting
appointments to judicial office and taking the Judicial Oath."
IT IS FOR PARLIAMENT through the Lord Chancellor and the Home Office to ACT.
THE PUBLIC, the ordinary citizen, MUST BE PROTECTED from the
rogues who operate illegally within the legal system.
email exchanges covering recognition of Rights FOR USE as we advocate.
Also confirmation as to WHY citizens CAN & SHOULD co-operate for the common good. On
the right realities and food for thought relative to the research warranted after the
creator of these page and web-site benefited from THE ORGANISED FRAUD & CORRUPTION
instigated and promulgated through the legal system and blunt abuse of the Courts'
|*Link from here
to the exclusive page which not one of the dreamers / stooges who contacted us or were
sent to Mr Andrew Yiannides in order to abuse his time with their reckless
misrepresentations while never bothering to address the issues the page covers and we
relate most clearly
Your confirmation and readiness to co-operate, as I have been advocating for many years,
is re-assuring that there is hope yet to cause men, with common sense, to recognise that
THE LAW IS NO ASS but they who believe such crap, are.
Len is back and will be publishing new challenges because of the new attempts, by the
criminals in control 'to misdirect his case in the corrupted areas of their practices of
Remember, each and every victim needs support AND HE / SHE MUST OFFER IT TOO, if we are to
be seen THE force to be reckoned with.
The idea for the FUTURE *W*I*L*L* take solid roots as we spread our wings and the law, as clarified by us is understood by the victims. Access:
for important material covering aspects of the divide and rule. Do not fail to access
The *office* page links you to a couple of other pages through the text / material in the
left column. READ IT ALL.
The exchanges on the left clear. We
only have to inform visitors, readers and researchers that the new contact, later informed
us that he joined the United Kingdom Men's
Movement without acting as he promoted.
We request of victims of the divorce industry and visitors to our pages
who are genuinely concerned, to access some home truths about the UKMM, from
here, and prepare for more revelations than what we spoke of to Mr. Anthony Pace, in
the presence of Mr Len Miskulin, of lbduk fame.
Read at the page of how the leading lights of the UKMM attempted to
entice Mr Andrew Yiannides in their fold..... out of the blue.... with a concocted
scenario that disclosed much more than the solicitor wrote of to a client in March 2003.
|In message 000e01c26fc3$fa0c2140$790dbd50@oemcomputer,
Anthony Pace <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes
> Hi Andrew,
> I am without a doubt that because my site is NAME THEM & SHAME THEM
all by names, and because I have attached the evidence,
> that they have decided not to touch me, for fear of litigation in a open court,
unlike our corrupt family courts; we need everyone to do the
> same. You are very correct when you say that their divide and rule tactics will come
to an end as soon as they realise, that we will
> not be picked off one by one, as they would like and have been doing for decades.
Have you had a look at my site, you are quite
> welcome to add material if you want.
I will do so as soon as I have corrected the many links that are not OK as a result of me
trying to kill two birds with one stone. I was working on the pages for both sites (at:
and the links from page to page are in a mess. Spent 4 hours correcting just the hundreds
of links to and in the ALL IMPORTANT PAGE
*2lipstalk.htm* where two maligned stooges who joined the fraudsters club were at it.
Trying also to influence / outwit and STITCH EACH OTHER UP when you read it all carefully.
> Could you explain what you mean
when you say : Feel free to ask for any bookmark you need to link to, and I will
gladly create one for
IF you feel that you need to have a direct link to the quote from George Washington - ALL
YOU NEED to do is to 'right click' on the hyper-linked word that WILL TAKE YOU THERE. A
pop up window will spring to life and IF YOU SELECT 'Properties' the full URL will pop up
in a new box/window.
I CAN incorporate the part that is made up of the #word (hush and word/words AS IN THE*
#ECoHR * member's case below) to the part you may wish to link directly, instead of just
the page or site.
If you understood my waffle / directions pick up a paragraph ANYWHERE at *human-rights*
where you want to link to and I WILL DO SO FOR your first, realisation. OK?
> Regards and keep in touch. When is
> Anthony Pace
> Ps. Andrew, some very strange things are happening; postings sent to you, as a reply,
are sent back to me... the scum are at it... can't
> be anything else.
Don't I know it. I did publish an intercepted and CENSORED EMAIL, but as I am in a rush
and the links may not be correct I will let you have details TO LINK TO, since it is
happening in a big way again.
WE MUST PUBLICISE AND DRAW ATTENTION TO THE VIOLATIONS - refer to the page
http://www.human-rights.demon.co.uk/yourrights.htm#ECoHR (this page)
"The Law is no ass. An ass is the person who believes it" (AY 1954)
However, it would appear that it is administered by asses". (Added 1975)
READ the Statement of FACTS lodged at the European Court of Human
READ ALSO the VIOLATIONS PLEADED as settled and submitted
- "No Damages For
Wrongful Eviction" in a matter of Shorthold Tenancy Agreements.
- Even in the case when the
Court of Appeal was called upon to rule & determine on appeal from a county court.
- In that instance the
tenants actually were evicted without any court proceedings and or court rulings in the
- The fact was that the
property owner had sold it as an empty property and the tenancy was simply a Shorthold.
- The letter below, from an
alleged 'servant of the public', retained and maintained by Haringey Council in North
London, POINTS TO THE RELIANCE alleged servants of the public place on abusers of judicial
chair occupation, as indeed was indulged in the case that caused the Lord Chancellor to
announce the introduction of 'The Bill of Rights', in 1997.
Times' Law Report more
|MOST IMPORTANT NOTE: Visitors, Readers, Researchers and VICTIMS OF THE PRACTICES
should read the explicit 'Appeal', after Enfield Council staff and officers indulged in
'creative accountancy; manipulation and constructive frauds on the taxpayers through
reliance on maladministration of the courts' processes / facilities and abuse of the
Housing Benefit funds as administrators / handlers of National Budget funds for Social
Security. [*Link from here [*L] to the facts & read the
appeal that caused the government to announce the introduction of the Bill of Rights, in
- The letter on the
right, from a council employee who arrogantly promoted the reliance 'such public servants'
place on 'officers of relevant local county court, while in pursuit of other activities
& services such persons offer, IN CONTEMPT OF THE LAW.
- We refer to the type of *abuse public
office* that was manifest in the Enfield Council case, pointed to above.
- Arrogant impositions on 'the serfs',
through violations of Article 1 of the First Protocol [*Link to] of the ECoHR, on targeted citizens-victims for any
number of reasons.
- Arrogant attempts, also, through Legal Aid
Certificates which abusers of the legal system (the facilities at the disposal of judicial
chair occupants) engaged in.
- The attempts so relied upon were abandoned after relevant challenges. The
solicitors who were acting for the Divorce victim (Link) and saw him land in prison,
because of misconduct by judicial chair occupants, were involved in the attempt and free
for all scam.
- NOTE: Victims of THE PRACTICES should link
from here to the response from the Legal Aid Board after two solicitors' attempted
to convert Housing Benefit owing to a targeted landlord, (with the court staff party to
the abuse/attempts) to legal costs.
from an abuser of Public Office.
USE OF FORGERIES, in the course of court
proceedings, is part of the Free-For-All
the criminals who are in control of the Legal System, the courts and the police, instigate
FOR promotion of the society they are creating right under our noses. Andrew
recognised the practice as of 1972 when a solicitor 'acting for him BUT FOR OTHER
INTERESTS, was seen to be party to organised deceptions and fraud aplenty. The victims of
such practices always scorned and ignored by public servants who are, after all, part
& parcel of organised, institutionalised Corruption. Rampant FRAUD instigated and
executed by public servants, the citizen's deputies / representatives in Parliament
act as blind, deaf and dumb monkeys with the exception of a few that do not count because
of their very small number. We are after all, an alleged democracy where the 'Let
Barrabas go, and crucify Christ', mob, control it all. We need not point further than the
Tony Martin case and how often that victim of rampant crime, unchecked and ignored by the
state's investigators (police) and the endorsement of such crimes by the courts that let
criminals loose on society to repeat their criminal activities at the expense of the
creative and frugal.
LIPS : Litigants
Society. First contacts with Mr. Andrew Yiannides and The
CAMILA Project : 1992, within weeks of the lodging of a explicit appeal at BOW COUNTY
to the appeal & briefly stated case). The only persons to have ever properly co-operated in and with the
essential challenges, as warranted, were Mr Norman Scarth and Mr Geoffrey Harold Scriven.
However, it was not long before both were noted to have changed camp. The former, although
he joined the Community on Line, and to all intents and purposes was to act as webmaster
for the Leeds / Yorkshire area, he DID absolutely nothing in that area for years. He
carried on as 'the sold to the system as is' fraudster' we now
expose in our pages. (*Link) His priority was to operate as an alleged victim who even
arranged through VERY convenient defaults to end in prison, IN ORDER that he could set up
LAW CENTRES in prisons & 'the authorities, conveniently moved him from prison to
prison. At the same time his LIPS associates outside were equipping themselves with
Facsimile equipment in order to act as alleged legal gurus to/for ;'the needy and targeted
'serfs'. THEIR goal, one only, just the carrot that is dangling at the end of the tunnel
for those who approve of and endorse the rampant Constructive
Frauds THROUGH the courts. The latter, Mr. G.H Scriven, through a questionably
construed letter by the Lord Chancellor was noted to have been party to attempts (with his
LIPS chums) to engage us in possible RACIST issues which Lord Irvine raised in his letter
to a Member of Parliament, about Mr G. H. Scriven's tribulations in the courts. Although
afforded an opportunity to STATE WHY the introduction of such an element by Lord Irvine Mr
Scriven 'conveniently defaulted to do so. Worse, he was noted to have been party to a
theatrical production at the Royal Courts of Justice; one that was NOT THE MUCH PUBLICISED
VENUE which the papers were trumpeting about. And the very papers promoting the LIPS crowd
/ mob as one of the alternative services to 'the serfs' who seek Justice. (The abducted
Goddess, raped by her jailers, the judiciary, who are free to act in contempt of all law
when seated in judicial chairs).
RIGHTS CONTEMPTUOUSLY IGNORED by the legal circles, including judicial chair occupants
had to satisfy the stringent test in Order 29, rule 1(1) of the Rules of the Supreme
Court [webmaster's note *not
law but rules of procedure created by the judiciary intended to make for smoother and
better use of the courts' time and processes*] that they were "necessary for disposing fairly, of the cause or
matter or for saving costs". NOTE
AND INVITATION to victims of the free-for-all and the rampant FRAUD IN THE LEGAL SYSTEM.
*human-rights* (NGO) and our affiliates are seeking details of cases where the legal
circles and the courts (judicial chair occupants) consciously failed to apply
relevant law to facts proven by documented evidence. The issue of 'judicial chair
occupants' suppressing / ignoring material facts when delivering judgements
and endorsing any manner of fraudulent activity by the legal circles, always leads to
THE CREATION OF LEGAL COSTS & CHARGES that are born by the 'citizens'. In the
exclusive page where legal argument by Mr Andrew Yiannides points to 'Law that can be
applied to the practices', a precedent case, House of Lords ruling is included.
Readers should access the page for an insight on the trappings and the convenient failures
by successive governments to introduce a Statutory Act for over 40 years in respect of the
anything goes and use of false / unchecked and unfounded assertions that simply inflate
costs through contempt of the law and court rules of procedure. (*Links: 1. An element of Interrogatories was covered at the time when the appeal was settled in 'The Breeding Grounds - case" -
published in our pages. It can be accessed from here. 2. *Link to the application of existing law to the issue of
suppressing material facts and issuing any court order that fails to account for the
suppressed proven facts and evidence, rendering court orders 'false instruments
because such orders lack accountability' and lead to the creation of costs and
can therefore be treated as instruments that lead to / create 'pecuniary advantage for
third parties, the legal teams. 3. *Link to an Order
when the Court DID REFER TO THE EVIDENCE ADDUCED leading to the court's judgement.]
Of Time / Date Immaterial:
"Where deceit was practised by an
intentional wrongdoer he was liable for the actual damages which directly flowed from the
fraudulent inducement without reference to the transaction date or any other date, and
foreseeability of such damages was irrelevant". No
victim-citizen can overlook the relevance of this ruling. One need only recognise
that crime is not statute barred, and that the law has always been there. It is the
operatives from within the legal system and the courts that have been endorsing and
promoting the activities of the legal circles, in contempt of the law, who are responsible
for the creation of the situation and the rampant FRAUD IN THE
LEGAL SYSTEM. [webmaster's note*
Declaration of Human Rights
December 10, 1948 the General assembly of
the United Nations adopted the Universal Declaration of Human Rights the full text of
which can be accessed through the link below. Following the historic act the Assembly
called upon all Member countries to publicise the text of the Declaration and "to
cause it to be disseminated, displayed, read and expounded principally in schools and
other educational institutions, without distinction based on the political status of
countries or territories." (*Link to the
full text of the declaration: http://www.un.org/Overview/rights.html
FOOTNOTE common to most
web-pages at this website
MOST IMPORTANT In October 2010, the coalition Government's
Attorney General, in an interview published by 'COUNSEL' the monthly legal banter
magazine, specifically spoke of the police distancing themselves from cases of (small-fry)
fraud and he asserted that he was making that element his
*Link from here
to the evidence, to the images of the published article.
IT REMAINS TO BE SEEN, WHAT the coalition of the
Con-LibDems, THE GOVERNMENT OF THE DAY WILL IN FACT ATTEND TO THE RAMPANT FRAUD, and IF
IT WILL DEAL with the criminals who abuse public office, especially when faced
with appropriate submissions and claims that will be delivered in due course.
Visitors/readers are urged to read the article published in the London Evening Standard,
as settled by the Rt. Hon. David Blunkett, Home Secretary in 2003
|*Link from here
to the article we reproduce in another webpage and consider "Why tolerate the arrogance of the legal circles who had
and have the audacity to assert to the lawmakers that they, the lawmakers have nothing to
do with the law"?
While there, above it, the explicit letter to
ex-Minister, the Rt. Hon. Frank Field MP, delivered a few days earlier. ALL alleged
victim-challengers who contacted Andrew Yiannides, by the time the letter was sent to the
Minister, received copy of the letter just as they received copies of other letters
submitted to government maintained Ministers and other official appointees to public
office. Accessing the material pointed to from the letter (URLs) is of utmost importance.
It should assist 'recognition of the citizen's rights at work', when called upon properly
in truly democratic states. The above in 2003; there were other 'submissions' and among
such civilised and, within the law, approaches by citizens that led to the right actions
by governments, the explicit challenges when we set about exposing one of the most evil of
alleged victims of the legal circles to have ever contacted us.
*Link to our explicit submissions to (a) the Prime Minister, (b) the Chancellor / Treasury, (c) the Home Secretary. We
acted so after we had secured more than enough evidence about the parts of an alleged
victim whose only interests were (i)
the rewards under the table FOR KEEPING QUIET about the ORGANISED FRAUD THROUGH ABUSE
OF THE COURTS' FACILITIES and (ii) her
parts in blunt attempts that were intended to discredit the person she was sent along to
mess about with, Mr Andrew Yiannides.
|Access please from here the letter from
Andrew Yiannides to the Home Secretary, the Rt. Hon. Jack Straw, in December 1998
*Link from here
to the letter
& note the results evinced in the newspaper article (Hornsey Journal) also
within days of the letter reaching its destination. Many the charlatans and stooges -lovers and
'promoters of the system as is'- on the job for decades; one and all acting as sold souls
*Link from here
to the evidence we point to relative to the parts of one of a number of sold to the system
fraudsters who were sent along / introduced to Andrew Yiannides by the managers /
organisers of the LIPS crowd / mob..
1. We publish in our pages the overriding
principles of Law applicable in the United Kingdom, a member of the European Union. In the
page /englishlaw.htm the issue of overriding principles are specifically pointed to. [*Link from here
to the page and read of official recognition, as of 1970].