typical.htm                      KEY  PageChanges 21 Nov. 2002

Typical Response  *Page created February 1997*
hrbnrsml.gif (1162 bytes) JOIN the Community On Line and publish your Statement of Facts (member's case at the European Court on Human Rights - paves the way) and the Evidence you have. Use your rights in law (link) and ACT , as / or with others, against the offenders. Join them and chip in for the creation of the mass of evidence against the abductors and rapists of Justice. You can then benefit from THE FACTS and evidence that you will help establish. It can all be used in any action, severally or jointly with others, as the case may be . Crimes against humanity are not ruled out when a large number of citizens can come up with evidence and as victims concur and or expand upon on the FACTS STATED & The VIOLATIONS PLEADED & /LODGED at the ECoHR, already.

Affiliated Sites For The Above Project / Activities   lbduk.org (group)

Read the Statement of facts / Legal Argument by and for the Chairman of live beat dads uk.org. Do not fail to note the rights pleaded  (par. 5.a & 5.b) in the case of a relationship gone astray, merely because the other side felt the urge and need for a change of partner. Thereafter ONE & ALL decided to use the innocent children as the vehicle for use in and for the conversion of assets industries, a division of CIUKU Enterprises!

We invite you to take part in DATA collection in the areas covered by The CAMILA Project. Your own contributions are and will be of value to all victims who are active now & to all others who, like you we hope, will be challenging the offenders by using the rights we point to, assured in law.

IMPORTANT Announcements
Announcement- July 2002

1. Court Proceedings ARE PUBLIC RECORDS.
2. Beware of Mischief Makers operating as and or for the Divide & Rule Brigade.
Do not be misled by self- appointed 'gurus' such as we cover in the  explicit pages /2lipstalk.htm & /chaldep1.htm who aim to serve the Fraudsters Club as in /confraud.htm (the page) either from within or as guided (by the abductors and rapists of Justice) mischief makers / recruits. Such persons come up with all sorts of poor excuses, as to why victims ought not to act as their rights in law provide. (Link)


JOIN the Community On Line and publish your Statement of Facts and Evidence. Use your rights in law. ACT against offenders, with others. the Community On Line and expose violations


 

 

 

 

 

Letter from an illiterate in the Lord Chancellor's Office / Department.

lochan1r.jpg (35533 bytes)

Typical Response from a waffling Public Servant.

KEY to Page & Site
1.  Page ISSUES - List
2.  Page CHANGES - List
3.  Site QUOTES - page
4.  Site Pages  - List
5.  Breeding Grounds - case
6.  CAMILA Project h-p - AIMS
7.  CAMILA- You Can help - Act
8.  C.I.C.A - Part if the Frauds
9.CitizensAlternativePrecedents
10. Confidential Fraud - Page
11.
12.

Page CHANGES - List
Links to New Material
1. Corrupt Courts - Page 
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.

B. Other Sites
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.

C. TION 3
part 1

D. SECTION 4
part 1

undercon.gif (286 bytes) Page Revised: June 20, 2012
Site re-construction for better navigation; ongoing improvements and additions

VISITORS ARE URGED to access and READ THE IMPORTANT update and ADDENDA we were obliged to introduce in January 2002. You will find it at the top of the Updated Pages File. We are sure that you will share with us our concerns and most profound disappointment at and with persons who adopt and promote activities which they know are nothing but downright crimes. We refer to our exclusive page where we expose (as conscientious law abiding citizens) the Confidentiality Between Fraudsters that exists care of the BEST OPEN SECRET. 

Guidelines for Navigating the extensive material: access instructions. 

As part of the reconstruction process our new pages and pages where changes and additions have been or are so to be improved - amended are endorsed with the link 'Page Changes and the date of the last changes. The link takes visitors to a List of the changes implemented in the page. This includes new material and links from relevant paragraphs to other  / new relevant material in other pages. For further clarification email: webmaster@


Citizens   Alternative    Precedents   (LIST)


We publish a typical response from the Lord Chancellor's  office; refer to thumbnail on the left, click enlarge and read it. It covers issues arising out of misconduct in public office(***) by judiciary'.  Read the letter, consider that violations under Article 13 of the ECoHR had been indulged in by far too many public servants. ALL were relying on judiciary to ignore The LAW(***).  Decide for yourself and join with us to challenge all violations that you have been the victim of and or become aware of in order that we may bring about changes in mentalities to Your Rights(***). 

'The Breeding Grounds - case'(***) was before a County Court. Everything From Within the Court itself was attempted in order to deny to a citizen his rights in law. Download and read the full case (briefly stated) and use it as an example. Learn how to avoid the traps the dishonest indulge in through abuse of   public office through the facilities at their disposal in order to deny you, YOUR RIGHTS systematically and habitually.

Public servants retained to serve the citizens, act in contempt of the law(***). They bluntly impose undeclared state policies and promote the much revered independence of the Judiciary, as the cornerstone of the society they have been building for centuries, unchallenged. Collectively they ACT outside the law they are meant to serve, and through their examples they indicate to the citizens THEIR CONTEMPT OF THE LAW. Upholding and obeying the LAW never part of their training. Instead they are simply instructed to respond to the citizens as the typical letter below clarifies.

Indulging in constructive frauds, endorsed and promoted through defaults and omissions by the official TRIAD, the legal/judicial/police circles. The practices exemplified in the Geoffrey Harold Scriven case you can access in our pages. That was but another example of THE SYSTEM THE TRIAD operates.

'The exposures in the Geoffrey Harold Scriven case(**) establish beyond any doubt the ORGANISED connections between the independent to ignore the law judiciary and the police forces that the United Kingdom maintains. The Law Enforcement agencies serving the dishonesty and greed of the legal circles, not Justice. And the legal circles indulging and relying on 'the system set in place and organised by the Law Enforcement Agencies.

The activities and defaults of all simply confirming the "fraud in the legal system" that was confirmed in a letter to our founder, in 1995, by the Right Honourable Paul Boateng, who served as MINISTER of STATE at the Home Office. To his credit he prefers to be listed as plain Mr Paul Boateng in the UK Government World Wide Web list of Ministers. No ego trips and or bloated ideas; just a plain, honourable and sincere member of Parliament whose heart and mind ARE in the right place, as the Home Secretary, he is serving the public with, proved to be in the matter of his son's errors and as he acted upon receipt of the letter we now publish(***) in the matter of the constructively engineered Housing Benefit frauds.

Read the 'typical response' letter; real also our submissions and recognise how to challenge abuses of the much revered and abused 'independence of the judiciary', promotions.  The next time you get a letter from the Lord Chancellor's Department advancing such excuses and Justifications, point out that the 'revered' independence implies that the judiciary should uphold the law without interference from any other; it does not imply INDEPENDENCE TO IGNORE THE LAW as in the threatened copyright infringement case(***), the serialisation of the book 'The Downing Street Years'(***).

The Court of Appeal determined in that instance that copyright Law exists only for ordinary citizens to be penalised, whereas those who can afford to pay for theatrical presentations, in our courts, can beach and  violate law and rights as they please. Such persons apparently should be allowed so to do IN ORDER that there should be another court case for the legal boffins to benefit from, AS DIRECTED by the Court of Appeal in its determination at the time.

Our Judiciary are there simply to generate appeal after appeal and case after case, thereby providing endless cases for our courts and for the circles from within which they arose to Judicial (note the word) office / chair. And there exist no provisions for anyone, let alone the citizens as in the United States, to challenge appointments of 'persons' to judicial office.

THE letter we publish here is typical of responses citizens receive from the Lord Chancellor's department. NOTE the STEREOTYPE answer 'INDEPENDENCE of the judiciary' ......(to ignore the law, the evidence and to ACT outside the law) because of other vested interests, as the many cases we shall refer to establish.

Note the obvious:-  (a) "this" in the singular,  (b) "countries" in the plural (c) the apostrophe in the plural goes after the 's' and not before the 's'. Needles to say the author should go back to school to learn English and the Lord Chancellor received such a suggestion from the citizen. Notice how the author was patronising, 'may I suggest'.... The citizen complains about serious issues such as corrupt practices (the abuse of office simply to generate income for the circles from within which judges, in the United Kingdom, arise to public office) and the citizen is treated with contempt and or as a moron by an illiterate.  FURTHER NOTE the reference to the alleged existence of a constitution in the country that had NONE apart from the Magna Carta. The citizen eight years on is still waiting to hear from the author of the letter where copy of this countries (????) written constitution can be secured.  AND FURTHER NOTE that the author, a presumed well versed in the available services (the CAB in this instance) knows not that the service he refers to is the ADVICE bureau and not an ADVANCE bureau; perhaps in the author's mind all from within that service are as advanced in ENGLISH, LAW and how to cover up corruption as the author of the letter. ALSO all NOW can SEE that the letter WAS SIGNED by the author and therefore ALL can deduce that the author was as careful and DILIGENT when he was reading the citizen's DETAILED complaint as when the author was reading the letter he is presumed to have dictated to another within the Lord Chancellors Department; that other as illiterate in English as the author himself. Naturally the author is also presumed to have been as DILIGENT and careful as the judge/judges he hastened to absolve of any wrong doing because the unwritten Constitution of the United Kingdom provides for ITS JUDGES TO BE INDEPENDENT OF or ignorant of PARLIAMENT'S CRIMINAL LAW. 

 

lochan1r.jpg (35533 bytes)

 

Media Promote
promedir.jpg (355521 bytes)

FOOTNOTE
Footnote eXtra: In October 2010, the coalition's Attorney General, in an interview published by 'COUNSEL' specifically spoke of the police distancing themselves from cases of (small-fry) fraud and asserted that he was making that element his department's priority. IT REMAINS TO BE SEEN, WHAT the coalition of the Con-LibDems, THE GOVERNMENT OF THE DAY WILL IN FACT ATTEND TO THE RAMPANT FRAUD, and IF IT WILL DEAL with the criminals who abuse public office, especially when faced with appropriate submissions and claims that will be delivered in due course. Visitors/readers are urged to read the article published in the London Evening Standard, as settled by the Rt. Hon. David Blunkett, Home Secretary in 2003 [*Link from here to the article we reproduce in another webpage and consider "Why tolerate the arrogance of the legal circles who had and have the audacity to assert to the lawmakers that the y, the lawmakers have nothing to do with the law"].
While there, above it, the explicit letter to ex-Minister, the Rt. Hon. Frank Field MP, delivered a few days earlier. ALL alleged victim-challengers who contacted Andrew Yiannides, by the time the letter was sent to the Minister, received copy of the letter just as they received copies of other letters submitted to government maintained Ministers and other official appointees to public office. Accessing the material pointed to from the letter (URLs) is of utmost importance. It should assist 'recognition of the citizen's rights at work', when called upon properly in truly democratic states. The above in 2003; there were other 'submissions' and among such civilised and, within the law, approaches by citizens that led to the right actions by governments, the explicit challenges when we set about exposing one of the most evil of alleged victims of the legal circles to have ever contacted us [*Link to our explicit submissions to (a)  the Prime Minister, (b) the Chancellor / Treasury, (c) the Home Secretary. WE acted so after we had secured more than enough evidence about the parts of an alleged victim whose only interests were (i) the rewards under the table FOR KEEPING QUIET about the ORGANISED FRAUD THROUGH ABUSE OF THE COURTS' FACILITIES and (ii) her parts in blunt attempts that were intended to discredit the person she was sent along to mess about with, Mr Andrew Yiannides]. Access please the letter to the Home Secretary, the Rt. Hon. Jack Straw, in December 1998 [*Link* [*L] from here to the letter] and note the results evinced in the newspaper article (Hornsey Journal) also within days of the letter reaching its destination. Many the charlatans and stooges -lovers and 'promoters of the system as is'- on the job for decades; one and all acting as sold souls always do [*Link [*L] from here to the evidence we point to relative to the parts of one of a number of sold to the system fraudsters who were sent along / introduced to Andrew Yiannides by the managers / organisers of the LIPS crowd / mob].
  1.  

NOTE:  Judges are meant to enter into Judicious decisions founded and resting on both FACT and LAW, with due consideration of THE EVIDENCE presented to them; not to express personal opinions, JUST decisions that rest and are founded on the evidence before them and not as their own other interests dictate*. Refer to "The Downing Street Years"* as a typical example of practices

Links to:  Breeding Grounds -case    The Downing Street Years - case   Scriven - case

Links to:  Scarth - case   Judith Ward - case   Frank Cunningham - case    Your Rights  

Link to:   Judges other interests The LAW  Other Interests  Misconduct in Public Office

Revised: June 20, 2012.

Back to HomePage