#PrimeRead of CORRUPT Detectives, Judges, Lawyers, Ministers - article in the London Evening Standard [*Link to image & text]

3rd March 2011 added link [*L] to the BBC-TV Dimbleby Lecture in 1976 as the Metropolitan 

Police Commissioner, Sir Rober Mark prepared & presented to the sucker-serfs

theyknow.htm                 KEY Page Changes 24 Aug 2004

They Know of It All *Page created October 22, 2002*

hrbnrsml.gif (1162 bytes) JOIN
the Community On Line and publish your Statement of Facts (member's case at the European Court on Human Rights - paves the way) and the Evidence you have. Use your rights in law (link) and ACT , as / or with others, against the offenders. Join them and chip in for the creation of the mass of evidence against the abductors and rapists of Justice. You can then benefit from THE FACTS and evidence that you will help establish. It can all be used in any action, severally or jointly with others, as the case may be. Crimes against humanity are not ruled out when a large number of citizens can come up with evidence and as victims concur and or expand upon on the FACTS STATED & The VIOLATIONS PLEADED as LODGED at the ECoHR, already.

Affiliated Sites For The Above Project / Activities   lbduk.org (group).

Read the Statement of facts / Legal Argument by and for the Chairman of live beat dads uk.org. Do not fail to note the rights pleaded  (par. 5.a & 5.b) in the case of a relationship gone astray, merely because the other side felt the urge and need for a change of partner. Thereafter ONE & ALL decided to use the innocent children as the vehicle for use in and for the conversion of assets industries, a division of CIUKU Enterprises!

We invite you to take part in DATA collection in the areas covered by The CAMILA Project. Your own contributions are and will be of value to all victims who are active now & to all others who, like you we hope, will be challenging the offenders by using the rights we point to, assured in law.

IMPORTANT Announcements
Announcement- July 2002

1. Court Proceedings ARE PUBLIC RECORDS.
2. Beware of Mischief Makers operating as and or for the Divide & Rule Brigade.
Do not be misled by self- appointed 'gurus' such as we cover in the  explicit pages /2lipstalk.htm & /chaldep1.htm who aim to serve the Fraudsters Club as in /confraud.htm (the page) either from within or as guided (by the abductors and rapists of Justice) mischief makers / recruits. Such persons come up with all sorts of poor excuses, as to why victims ought not to act as their rights in law provide. (Link)


KEY to Page & Site
Page CHANGES - List
Letters TO - List Page&Site Letters FROM List Page&Site
News ARTICLES - Page List
Page IMAGES - List
LAW Convention Rights
LAW European Union Rights
The page - ISSUES
This Page - QUOTES
The SITE - PAGES
Site QUOTES - page
OTHER SITES - Short List
Persons & Institutions- List 1.
The ISSUES Covered - List 2.
Page DOCUMENTS - List 3.
Page VENUES / Events List 5.
ARTICLES In the Press List 6.
HeadsU WinTailsTheyLose 7.
RECKLESS Public Servants8.
<>part<>.

Page CHANGES List
Page Created 23/10/2002
1. Links to New Material 
2. Added Press Articles 
3. Pointing to the EVIL Ones
4. Pointing to TANGENTS
5. Link to Organised CHEATS
6. Fraudsters Testing Us Link
7. A National FRAUD Squad
<>part 4.
<>part 4.

Persons / Institutions
1. Courts - Court Service   1.
2. Commissioner-Metropolis2.
3. The police - General       3.
4. fraudsters Club              4.
5. Haringey Police-events  5.
6. The Treasury                  6.
7. Home Office-Secretary 7.
8. PrimeMinister-Priv.Office 8.
9. Veronica Beryl Foden    9.
10. LIPS Crowd / Mob      10.
11. Evening Standard Ltr. 11. <>
12.

ARTICLES In The Press     1. N. London Weekly Post  1.
2. The DailyTelegraph 8/2002
3. The Independent Aug 2002
4. The TIMES - June 1997
part 5.

Page DOCUMENTS   - List
Letter To Prime Minister
Letter From Prime Minister
Response To Prime Minister
Submissions To Abuser
Submissions To TREASURY
Submissions To Pri. Minister
Submissions To Home Office
Fax To London Ev. Standard
<>part<>


The Prime Minister and his office acted in 1999. We were informed that our submissions were referred  to the Home Office.pmled99r.jpg (33033 bytes) It was a step in the right direction and our response, below, covered our concerns on issues that victims of the TRIAD, report to us.


Our letter below, to the Prime Minister covered the issues of most concern.
ltpmd98f.jpg (103179 bytes)
The Prime Minister/ his office informed us that our submissions as presented in our letter/fax of 17th November 1999, had been referred / forwarded to the Home Office / Secretary. We were happy with the steps taken, BUT post room juniors at the Home Office 'overruled the actions taken by Downing Street and they, allegedly forwarded our submissions to the Lord Chancellor's Office / Department. In other words to the den and centre of all fraud creation and or endorsement.


They know of the positive discrimination and the plans of the nonelected to keep on acting as absolute masters in an allegedly Democratic State. A state that allegedly rests and is founded on law and order YET the public SERVANTS (not our Lords or Masters) indulge in rampant theft of properties (including rights in law) and even interfere with the duties of the elected to manage and control our environment and to provide for our peace of mind. tlrjclr.jpg (199122 bytes) Blunt interference by judges AS PROMOTED by the media barons. IMPOSING a world of anything goes, no law and no duty to the citizens. In line with 'The 'serfs' are subject to our whims and the plans of others'. Plans hatched up in secret meetings and the Ministers treated as persons of non effect in an alleged Democracy (*Link to some thoughts on the issues)


THE TWO ARTICLES ABOVE & BELOW, COULD NOT BE CLEARER. RECOGNISE THE FACT THAT THE PRESS AND MEMBERS OF PARLIAMENT ARE TREATING CITIZENS IN PSEUDO-DEMOCRACIES AS NON-THINKERS. THEY RELY, OF COURSE, ON PRINCIPLES THAT REST ON THE ROTTEN FOUNDATIONS WE ARE TO EXPOSE AFTER POINTING TO SUCH FOR DECADES NOW. FOR OVER 12 YEARS WE HAVE BEEN LOOKING INTO THE REASONS, WHAT, WHO AND WHICH FACTORS ARE IN THE WAY OF PROGRESS ESPECIALLY SINCE THE WORDS TO THE LAWYERS ATTRIBUTED TO CHRIST BY THE EDITORS OF THE GOSPEL ACCORDING TO ST. LUKE

undercon.gif (286 bytes) Site reconstruction - Page Revised: August 17, 2012 : Introduced links to page from other relevant pages at the website 
Guidelines on Navigating through the extensive material: access* [*Link] instructions.  

This page relates to the case Mr Andrew Yiannides was working at and upon which THE IMPORTANT update and the ADDENDA* [*Link] we were obliged to introduce in January 2002, rests. Details can be found at the top of the Updated Pages file. We are sure that visitors, readers and researchers will share with us our concerns and most profound disappointment at and with persons like Mrs Veronica Beryl Foden, who adopt and promote activities which they know are criminal in concept and intent. Such persons engage and participate in downright organised crimes* [*Link] that rest and are founded on securing assistance through deceit, fraudulent misrepresentations and arrogant fraudulent gains through abuse of trust. We refer to our exclusive page* [*Link] where we expose -as conscientious law abiding* [*Link] citizens- the element of constructively engineered and created *Confidentiality Between Fraudsters*; the confidentiality that relies on the age-old principle of 'Honour Among Thieves'; the confidentiality that is founded on the BEST OPEN SECRET, in an allegedly civilised society; the foundations we point to in an exclusive page; a page which fraudsters of Mrs. Veronica Beryl Foden's mentality shoved in the dark corners of their corrupted minds, as another product of the society that reared her. Below our submissions to government in February 2002 and thereafter to the media over an extended period. Odd it was not that in the course of working with and for the lousy actress, Andrew discovered that the city she hailed / hails from, in its Coat of Arms emphasis was / is given to the creation of the creators of all that is evil and has been ongoing for millennia, that Mr Yiannides knows of and recognised as a young teenager. [*Link from here to the basis for the aforesaid & from there follow the link to the lesson by example stated in the creation of the fraudsters who delivered to mankind their plans for the sons of men on planet earth]    

As part of the reconstruction process our new pages and pages where changes and additions have been or are so to be improved / amended, are endorsed with the link 'Page Changes and the date of the last changes. The link takes visitors to a List of the changes implemented in the page. This includes new material and links from relevant paragraphs to other  / new relevant material in other pages. For further clarification email: webmaster@

We refer, and we cover in the addenda we point to above, to issues that have been of concern to us for years. We have known for even longer of the facilities in place, and 'how stooges and planted mischief makers engage in activities 'for, with, and within the established formula* [*Link] of Crimes Incorporated United Kingdom Unlimited (CIUKU) Enterprises, operations.

The facsimile communications and letter we publish in this page cover part of the developments that arose out of the activities and convenient defaults attached to breaches that such persons engaged in with intent while presenting themselves as 'the innocent victims of those they were co-operating with while aiming to cause embarrassment and damages to persons they attached themselves to. Such persons engage in the creation of false instruments (the favourite tool of the organisers and controllers of the self-perpetuating cancerous growth industry, the legal system and court services) and misrepresentations, the foundations and corner-stone of CIUKU Enterprises.

Our facsimile to the last of the LIPS mob/crowd introduction, which we publish now, covers* [*Link] some of the highlights 'the crocodile tears victim of them all' was engaging in for over fifteen months. All the while she was indulging, as others of her ilk and introductions from the same crowd/mob had been. Playing at cat and mouse games with plenty of excuses for her failures to act as she had agreed (in the first instance) to do simply established that she had come along as a new understudy of the very same role as other tutored and used stooges dabbled in before her. Blaming all others, the persons in control of 'the legal system and the courts, promoting and thriving in such promotions, is the trade mark of the planted mischief maker and the person who aspires, if not already a member, to join 'the fraudsters' club'. [*Link from here to proof that one such person had been negotiating the reward he was looking forward to as one who was to engage in furtherance of the system of operations & one who fully intended to keep it all under his hat in accordance with the stipulated conditions from the agents of the criminals in control]

Andrew's letter to the Prime Minister was very clear. Although we were informed by the Prime Minister's private office, that the activities we reported TO the Prime Minister, were referred to the Home Secretary / Home Office (in their letter dated 29th November 1999) some junior in the post room at the Home Office, apparently / allegedly HAS MORE AUTHORITY in governing these islands than our elected Prime Minister. At least that is the impression we are led to believe, accept and lump it, as serfs of the Middle Ages. Such activities and notions from within an allegedly civilised modern democratic state that allegedly, rests, is managed and it is also allegedly run on principles of law and order.

The developments after our submissions to:

  • The Treasury
  • The Prime Minister
  • The Home Office
  • With copies and submissions to editors [*Link] of selected press and media controllers >none responded<

Produced some 'miraculous and coincidental developments' as Official Press Releases were circulated and promoted by the media. These varied from the gutsy proclamations by the Commissioner of the Metropolitan Police, through the concerns of the Ministers and the propositions by the Home Office / Secretary to 'train the allegedly non-existent and or incompetents who are in control of ALL police Authorities, in Fraud Investigation.

  • We hand over to the police, FORGERIES that establish HOW thefts and misappropriation of funds belonging to third parties were 'otherwise planned for', by the staff and officers, alleged servants of the public, operating out of Haringey Council, as was / is the situation within other Local Authorities / Borough Councils.
  • We point out, to police officers who purportedly were investigating the arrogant fraud on targeted 'serfs', that an initial FORGERY was subsequently used to create another two clones, and we hand true copies of the forgeries and a Section 9 Statement duly signed by the targeted victim of the frauds.
  • We point out when and how the initial FORGERY, also HOW & WHY two clones were introduced, subsequently, by the staff and officers of Haringey Council.
  • We emphasise as to HOW the THREE FALSE  INSTRUMENTS were promoted, used and relied upon by the tutored in theft and misappropriation of Housing Benefit funds, staff and officers operating out of Haringey Council, as was the case with staff and officers operating out of Enfield Council. [*Link from here to the explicit appeal that caused the Lord Chancellor to announce the Bill of Rights in 1997 & NOTE that the very realities and developments did not and do not exist as far as each and every one of the *fraudsters club recruits* we are exposing in our pages are concerned].
  • We point out to the police, the creative accountancy schemes operated by Local Authority staff & officers. And we produce documented evidence ESTABLISHING INTENT & ORGANISED SYSTEMATIC FRAUD on .
  • We provide other documented evidence to the police, establishing that CREATION AND PROMOTION OF FALSE INSTRUMENTS is part and parcel of the training and the activities of staff and officers who operate out of Local Authorities, the staff of which are entrusted with funds belonging to others, NOT THEIR EMPLOYERS who train and tutor them in the creation and the promotion of CIUKU Enterprises, operations.
  • We point out that ALL RELY and even boasted of their reliance on abusers of public office who operate as alleged judicious persons by mere occupation of 'some judicial chair, at some bench in some local court'.
  • We point out that staff and officers at local courts indulge in the creation and posting of false instruments, such as 'allegedly legitimate court orders' that lack accountability by the alleged authors of the false instruments, as covered in an explicit affidavit the police has site of and we published in our pages (not linked for general access).
  • We point out to the police that such false instruments, as covered above, conveniently are posted late and or to collaborating in the scams local letting agents (persons - not lifeless limited liability legal entities that manage and run themselves by themselves in accordance with the logic -or lack of it- promoted by legal gurus trained in the CIUKU Enterprises mould.
  • We point out to the police that the postings of false instruments by the local courts, to the collaborating persons who manage and run local letting agencies are also posted late in order to lead to another favourite ploy by the criminals who manage the courts' business.
  • And we explain that the ploy is used solely and ONLY FOR THEFT OF PROPERTIES (including legal rights, such as the right to a fair hearing within the rules and regulations) and NOT THROUGH THE CREATED LEAVE TO APPEAL PLOY that the late posting of False Instruments (lacking accountability by the authors/creators) ARE INTENDED TO LEAD TO.
  • The above ploy, naturally, FOR, BY AND AND WITH MEMBERS OF THE LEGAL CIRCLES AND PROFESSIONS, who feel free to walk into any court of law (allegedly), to advance any fabricated falsehood in order that they be rewarded with 'the costs of their labours and ingenuity'. The rewards either through Legal Aid Funding or through imposed charges for which the targeted victims / citizens then suffer the usual carnage of the lambs by the wolves. 
  • We submit such facts and more and we deliver to the police documents and submissions they sign for. Conveniently among their number and their organisation no one knows how to handle the submissions and evidence and very conveniently they report and allege loss of or misplaced material. Replacement documents handed to a senior officer IGNORED AND NOT ACTED UPON, suffering from the very same 'invisible substance and state of non-existence.
  • We can only hope that the Home Secretary will be able to find and caused to be trained better calibre personnel for the proposed new NATIONAL FRAUD SQUAD intended to tackle 'white collar fraud'.
  • God, what else is there for 'mere mortals' to think of at such times. The 'miracles', in the areas we cover, are simply created FOR AND BY THE ADMINISTRATORS and CONTROLLERS OF LAW AND ORDER. They arrogantly INDULGE AND BENEFIT through abuse of and misconduct in public office. The criminal activities MANIFEST within the law enforcement agencies. Yet successive governments maintain the persons at THE EXPENSE OF THE BUDGET and ultimately the TAX-PAYERS, the VICTIMS OF THEM ALL.
  • For years we play daft and we put up with charlatans like Norman Scarth et all, from within the LIPS crowd/mob. All too eager and like other organised groups of fraudsters, gearing to work as legal gurus in preparation for the new ploy/channel, the Lord Chancellor's new baby, the Legal Services Commission (NOTE: The LSC is controlled and managed by the same wolves, as the Legal Aid Board was, 'FOR ORGANISED FRAUD on the taxpayers and targeted 'serfs' / 'shitizens'. The organised fraud is exclusively covered and exposed in our pages, specifically through through reference to the practices and the arrangements in place for the Double Constructive Fraud [*Link]).
  • Such persons are using the needs of the victims they are pointed to or target of their own as organised mobs. They simply WORK IN CONFORMITY with the arrangements in place'. They do so, because they approve of and endorse fraud, motivation (?) JUST THEIR LOVE FOR MORE OF THE SAME, the CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUDS ON THE BUDGET, through the courts. That was precisely the objective of the fraudster, Veronica Beryl Foden, who was introduced by the LIPS crowd/mob, as yet another fraudster, to be testing our knowledge of the system, and OUR RESILIENCE & TENACITY. Reporting her and those she was working with and for, all along [*Link from here to an explicit Fax to the fraudster], to the relevant government department / officers, was the least we could do. However, we made sure that at the same time THE WORLD JURY WAS / IS BEING INFORMED.
  • It now befalls all genuine challengers and victims and all leaders of organised groupings - The groups that are not guided and used by the type of charlatans and fraudsters who have been too busy suppressing facts and realities NOT TO MENTION THEIR EVIL ACTIVITIES BEHIND THE SCENES as agents of the creators and lovers of the system of operations in place. Another typical example of organised fraudsters, as the LIPS crowd/mob, being the UKMM (United Kingdom Men's Movement) who had the nerve to accept directions from persons who were in the know of 'what was in store for our founder) and wrote to Andrew with tongue in cheek to promote concocted scenarios WHILE EXPOSING THEIR PART IN INSTITUTIONALLY ORGANISED FRAUD & CORRUPTION.       

We publish below the documents in HTML for we shall be including links from and to the text attached to and arising out of the content of the documents and some of the evidence that clarifies, qualifies and establishes the truth of the matters stated and covered in the documents.

In the column on the left we shall be publishing scanned thumbnails of the documents as posted and or as transmitted to the recipients. We are including relevant newspaper articles, the results of  Press Releases that came to life after the submissions to the government. The issue of billions for compensation because of errors or mistakes is not the same as THE CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUDS WE COVER IN OUR PAGES and non-participating victims are subjected to. Enticing victims into the fold and THE FRAUDSTERS CLUB and rewards for keeping it all in the family closet as with the media barons and public servants makes for A STATE MANAGED BY CRIMINALS; persons whose main pre-occupation has been and is the torment and torture of citizens whose only mistake was to seek Justice in the theatres managed by fifth rate directors, the abductors and rapists of Justice.

On 17th November 1999, submissions / letter to the Prime Minister

17 November 1999

The Rt. Hon. Tony Blair - Prime Minister
10 Downing Street
Private Office
London

AX to: 0171-925-0918

OPEN LETTER

My Ref. 17NOLITA

 

Dear Prime Minister

Re: My concerns unheeded; irresponsibly handled by your office and public servants.

The Daily Telegraph on 20th August 2002 dt20802f.gif (155989 bytes)
An article in the press after the reports to the government in Feb.2002

I re-transmit my letters of 9th August and 18 September as OPEN LETTERS, now. Defaults by public servants are unacceptable. Your office stated [*Link from here to letter confirming] that my communications were referred to the Home Office. I expected of the Home Secretary to issue instructions and or the government to act as it did following my letter of 18th December 1998 [*Link to text in HTML for links to from the text]. I have no option but to withdraw confidential cover. My communications to you and the exchanges I had with the Rt. Hon. Paul Boateng in May/July 1995 were succinctly put. My submissions to debates, in the course of the Festival of Rights, were also clear. In June 1997 publicity for a specific adoption.[*Link from here to press release]

I transmit copy of the letter of 30 September 1999 to the police at Haringey. It is time for all to take stock of the situation; the police must abandon the usual trick of cards, diversions. They set themselves on course for the long established operations, exemplified in the Stephen Lawrence sham. Citizens look to the police for investigations proper and prosecutions, no matter who the criminals are. Housing Benefit funds misappropriated and Haringey council staff promote / use and rely on Forgeries to justify their dishonest handling of funds belonging to another. The tenant, to whom they allege the funds were released, in the meantime, denies knowledge of the forgeries the council staff secured and adduced for joint scenarios. [*Link from here to the letter from the CEO, Gurbux Singh at Haringey]

The police failed to investigate and or act upon the information given to them. To this day they deliberately default to take my statement. They appear simply ready to shove crimes and skeletons in the family closet; they seek avoidance of the facts and the evidence WITH INTENT. The evidence to secure convictions exists, and the police play musical chairs. No one adduces proof that ALL Housing Benefit funds were actually paid to the tenants and agents. Council staff, however, engaged another council department, through which to contemplate use of the funds they misappropriated through a FORGERY. [*Link to a statement to Stephen Knight when he was researching his work for 'The Brotherhood' at about the time when the founder of human rights was discovering how high the fraud and the corruption in the UK].

My concerns and observations succinctly put. The revenue providers pay taxes for specific services by the police. They do not pay for reports by the police about one another. I am left with no alternative but to prepare for publication on the Internet a succinctly pleaded affidavit. It covered all aspects and the evidence in support of the CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUDS. Crime through misconduct in public office by public servants. Other Affidavits/Statements will follow.

I expected of you to act personally and expeditiously as with the additional funding to Haringey, following my letter of 18 December to the Rt. Hon. Jack Straw, Home Secretary. Do note that Haringey council officers do not know how many properties the Council owns. Worse they do not know how many properties are empty! In the meantime one and all from within it were and have been busy defrauding the state through a two/three tier system of rent fixing. Pecuniary advantage and gain also at the expense of targeted private landlords. Blunt misconduct in public office. FORGERIES, deception, dishonest handling of funds, belonging to and intended for others as the Tenancy Agreements establish and secure. Fraudulent misrepresentations, theft and misappropriation of moneys belonging to targeted property owners and reliance on other public servants to promote and or ignore such CRIMINAL ACTIVITIES. The state, through the DSS remits funds for the occupation of the contracted / rented properties, not on other grounds. In the instance at hand the evidence establishes PREMEDITATED CRIMES.

I beg to refer you to a reported case of murder. The person driven to murder had been accused of theft; misappropriation of just £1.50 worth of postage stamps. YES one pound fifty pence, NOT THOUSANDS of pounds. He had been working for a solicitor; he vehemently denied stealing and or misappropriation. Nonetheless the police PROSECUTED him. Upon release from prison he called at his accuser's residence and knifed him to death. The DISCRIMINATION is as clear as it can come. An alleged theft is prosecuted merely because the accused could not remember if he used the stamps and failed to record for what postings. BUT, the important factor is, the accuser was a member of the protected species in our society, a solicitor. The law was applied to punish for an alleged theft a presumed criminal. In the instance at hand the CRIMINALS are public servants and they are apparently entitled to immunity from prosecutions because they had/have were/are stealing from targeted victims; from persons that were/are not entitled to protection under the law, as in Nazi occupied Europe.

I am disappointed but I am ready to act, unless the police in Haringey act diligently and within the law. They must assist with securing access to a specified property. The used and encouraged tools (tenants) have caused extensive damages to the property and they have been obstructing access to it; worse they have been THREATENING REPRESENTATIVES OF THE OWNERS WITH PHYSICAL VIOLENCE AND INDULGING IN VERBAL AND VULGAR ASSAULTS. All, care of condescending public servants, in the United Kingdom's Gulag; the disgrace of New Labour, Haringey.

The police must be instructed to take my statement and prosecute the villains and the criminals. The evidence will be published on the Internet if no action is taken forthwith. The LAW is the LAW and Discrimination on any grounds is a violation of human rights under Article 14 of the European Convention. WORST is the violation of Article 1 of the First Protocol. I hereby call upon you to refer to me any Act of our Parliament that violates the said provision. I hereby invite you to qualify the grounds upon which such an Act of Parliament, if in existence, is within the Convention, bearing in mind the fact that no contracting party could or should enact any law that violates any of the rights guaranteed. The Police MUST trace the whereabouts of the misappropriated funds; that is what they are retained to do; they are not paid to write never-ending reports about their defaults and omissions. Use of incompetent excuses by seasoned and instructed criminals who diverted funds to others and or other uses are unacceptable when the owner of such properties is denied/deprived constructively of his/her properties and rights in law.

We are fast approaching the new millennium. The United Kingdom deserves better than exposure of the reckless mentalities of public servants who abuse their positions for pecuniary advantage for themselves and others at the expense of targeted victims. The Internet now provides access and exposure to the world of the facts of life the seasoned criminals and the state can not evade.

Sincerely

 
Andrew Yiannides
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
London XXXXXXXXX

Attachments: 2 earlier letters and the Fax to the police dated 30 September 1999 as covered in the text.

October 2002, submissions to the 'London Evening Standard'.

http://www.human-rights.demon.co.uk   <<< web-site closed March 2006

To: Evening Standard - NEWSDESK Fax: (020) RL7937-2648 / ND-7938-7547
From: Andrew Yiannides - founder of h-r Date: 22nd October 2002
Re: Institutionalised CRIME/ FRAUD/CORRUPTION Pages: EIGHT including this cover
CC: Community On Line - Folder Reference: 22ORCFFD
¨ Urgent ¨ For Review ¨ Please Comment ¨ Please Reply ¨ Please Recycle

MESSAGE

To who it may concern - PRIORITY ISSUES

Dear Sir

Further to my call earlier today, when I spoke to a Mark Walden(?) I transmit the explicit two-page letter to the Prime Minister of 17 November 1999.

I transmit also the two-page FAX transmission to the Treasury on 22nd February 2002, after I caught an alleged victim of the legal system 'in cohoots with the persons she was accusing of the devastation of her life'. That alleged victim was working for 'the compensation rewards (not award) under the table that we cover in the exclusive page …co.uk/confraud.htm [*Link from here to page] at human-rights. Another, genuine victim, was being assisted to challenge 'the abuse of the facilities the legal system operators indulge in freely'. The latter's case was later registered at the ECoHR. The stated facts and the violations pleaded as argued by us are but the tip of the iceberg [*Link from here to submitted pleadings].

I transmit also three pages of a letter dated 18th April 2002. It was not sent to the Home Secretary, at the time, because of ongoing work for the challenges submitted to the ECoHR for the Community on Line member. Above all because we were made aware that the Home Secretary was to act (with others endorsing the propositions?) with steps intended to deal with 'white collar fraud'. The letter will be delivered to the Home Secretary in due course and as with other communications it will be published on the Internet, for obvious reasons.

The activities I have been looking into for over thirty years now, command that the promises by the Government in waiting in 1995, be implemented. I firmly believe that the intention is there. I can but correctly assume that to be the case, because of the move of the Rt. Hon. Paul Boateng to the Treasury, AFTER my succinct submissions to: (a) The Treasury, (b) The Prime Minister, (c) The Home Secretary in January / February 2002.

Andrew Yiannides NDD., ACFI., ATI., FNAAAS.
webmaster@uk-human-rights.org

Human-Rights Organisation
Non Governmental Organisation
Promoting and Protecting
Human Rights World Wide
Go To: http://members.human-rights.org 

JOIN the COMMUNITY ON LINE

NOTE: A USA corporation contracted with Mr Andrew Yiannides, the founder & creator of the Human-Rights Community on Line. Under the terms of the agreement the corporation was to provide free web-site (space of 20 megabyte per signed up member). Among the contracted facilities the USA corporation was to provide full provisions, from email accounts for each member under their signed up web-site domain name@xxx.human-rights.org, newsletter postings from the centre, a member's lobby area with facil8ty for a latest developments notice board and much more. From the onset the engineers of the USA corporation were blocking Newsletters from reaching members and were failing to release to Mr A Yiannides (owner of the domain name *human-rights.org*) information about new members joining.

Remember:-
"Do for, by and with yourself that which satisfies you, so long as that which
you do, does not infringe upon and or violate the rights of any other". (AY ©)

Below our submissions to the Treasury some two weeks earlier by email, and on 22nd February 2002, by FAX transmission, with the added introduction.
1http://www.human-rights.demon.co.uk <<< web-site closed March 2006
 
To: The Chancellor - TREASURY Dpt. Fax:     (020) 7270 - 4580
From: Andrew Yiannides - founder of h-r Date:     22nd February 2002
Re: Institutionalised CRIME / FRAUD Pages:     TWO including this cover
CC: Community On Line - Folder Reference:     22FETEFA
¨ Urgent ¨ For Review ¨ Please Comment ¨ Please Reply ¨ Please Recycle

An official Press Release informs the taxpayers that the government forked out £12.3 BILLION (pounds sterling) the previous year in compensation claims.
in270802.jpg (82095 bytes)
soon after our reports to Ministers and the media, a miracle?

WAKE UP

SUCKERS you pay taxes for such activities by YOUR servants and protectors

MESSAGE

To whom it may concern - PRIORITY ISSUES

Attached copy-paste of an email sent to the treasury covering the most unacceptable of institutionalised - organised FRAUD. The practices covered are unacceptable and most certainly cannot continue as non-events. No sooner had an explicit affidavit been lodged at a county court because of abuse of 'the court facilities' for fraudulent conversion of housing benefit funds (covered in the National Scandal pages) and the Bill of Rights was announced, in 1997.

We expect of the government that promised in 1995 to deal with the "Fraud In The Legal System" to attend to the issues raised in the posting and the facts covered in our pages. We expect justice to be delivered here, at home, to our own citizens in keeping with the well-known adage "Charity / JUSTICE begins at home".

We expect of the media to deal with the issues and to publish the facts and the realities. We expect editors to tell the truth and to cease covering the rampant fraud and corruption that is organised through and by public servants and bodies. We expect of all to note the assured arrogance of public servants who assert that 'their activities will and can be sanctioned through the relevant courts'. We cover such 'boasting' in our pages and any concerned civil servant or reporter is invited to seek any additional information after visiting our pages. [*Link to a letter from an abuser of public office, operating out of Haringey Council, providing invisible to a fraudster asserting reliance on judicial chair occupants to endorse the ILLEGAL ACTIVITIES and attempts to impose their evil ways]

Andrew Yiannides
* human-rights * NGO
London - UK
22 February 2002

The e-mail to the Treasury: -

"Further to my enquiry earlier today I wish to re-iterate that through abuse of public office billions of tax revenue is wasted through the scheme covered at:

http://www.human-rights.demon.co.uk/confraud.htm   <<<< New URL embedded in link

Through an ongoing case that I have been following very closely, for over 15 months now, I can furnish all necessary information to a senior officer. However I MUST EMPHASISE that most DEFINITELY I am not prepared to deal with any person attached to and or operating out of the Lord Chancellor's department and office, the den of it all. [*Link to the arrogance of a judicial chair occupant who was acting in contempt of the law by electing to IGNORE A BLUNT FORGERY. The forgery was used in the course of fraudulently engineered court proceedings INTENDED TO LEAD TO THE REWARDS UNDER THE TABLE using funds plundered from the national budget and in the processes the silver lining of the pockets of the legal circles AS ARRANGED & ORGANISED by judicial chair occupants, always, as the example this link takes one]. Access also:

http://www.human-rights.demon.co.uk/thefacts.htm#Exhibit_3  <<<< NOTE: the abused Legal Aid facility and the withdrawal after an attempt was challenged

There were other instances when solicitors and COUNTY COURT staff and OFFICERS, purportedly acting as public servants were doing so, WITHIN THE LAW. The latter, allegedly, as judicious persons and not just as judicial chair occupants. All, contemptuous of the law, indulging in rampant fraud with the police playing footsie when the crimes, INCLUDING FORGERIES, were reported to 'such public servants' who are operating, allegedly within our law and order founded, alleged, democracy'. [*Link to an article covering CORRUPTION IN HIGH PLACES, including police, legal circles, judges, Ministers]

I would appreciate confirmation upon receipt and beg to refer you to the NATIONAL SCANDAL pages at human-rights. There the free-for-all, through abuse of the Housing Benefit funds is covered. From 800 million to over 4.5 billion. Within 3 years the miraculous re-calculation and or re-appraisal of the blunt corruption at and through the local authorities and publicly funded organisations.

The explicit page / file covering the abuse of the courts' facilities by those who are meant to administer parliament's and other law, commands immediate attention. In the meantime consider carefully the four quotes in our HomePage. The conclusion in 1972/1975 was confirmed in 1984/1986 and better still through two high profile fraud cases that raise many questions as to the selective application of facilities at the disposal of the 'incompetent' (to put it mildly) in control of it all.

Sincerely

Andrew Yiannides
*human-rights* NGO
London - UK
21 February 2002

PS. I have been researching the corruption and fraudulent abuse of the courts' facilities for over 30 years, and in the circumstances treat this communication accordingly. In 1995, through submissions to the Prime Minister-in-waiting, I qualified from an appropriate response covering "The FRAUD IN THE LEGAL SYSTEM". At least three alleged victims who were co-operating in the *confraud.htm* scenarios (CONfidentiality Between FRAUDsters) targeted me and my work, and two others attempted to draw me in such vile scenarios.

Copy of the letter from the government in waiting with attached promises will be sent presently to the Prime Minister as a reminder and as an antecedent to publication of the succinct letter on the Internet.

When the National Health service and Education are crying out for funds the billions wasted through fraud and salaries on and for incompetent police forces, whose main pre-occupation is TO CREATE TANGENT EXERCISES as the Lawrence murder Inquiry (to and for which the author of this communication made explicit submissions) the state should ensure that ALL ABUSE AND FRAUD, when reported, by concerned citizens, is dealt with, expeditiously and DILIGENTLY. Access also:

http://www.human-rights.demon.co.uk/natinscan.htm#where_the_will_the_way <<<< New URL embedded in link
and consider carefully the succinct letter to the Home Secretary, at the time. More material can and will be published in due course for it is time to cease treating Mr and Mrs Average as the old age pensioner in the same page.
--

webmaster@human-rights.demon.co.uk   <<<< New email address embedded in link

Human-Rights Organisation
Non Governmental Organisation
Promoting and Protecting
Human Rights World Wide
Go To: http://members.human-rights.org 
JOIN the COMMUNITY ON LINE
NOTE: A USA corporation contracted with Mr Andrew Yiannides, the founder & creator of the Human-Rights Community on Line. Under the terms of the agreement the corporation was to provide free web-site (space of 20 megabyte per signed up member). Among the contracted facilities the USA corporation was to provide full provisions, from email accounts for each member under their signed up web-site domain name@xxx.human-rights.org, newsletter postings from the centre, a member's lobby area with facil8ty for a latest developments notice board and much more. From the onset the engineers of the USA corporation were blocking Newsletters from reaching members and were failing to release to Mr A Yiannides (owner of the domain name *human-rights.org*) information about new members joining.

Remember:
"Do for, by and with yourself that which satisfies you, so long as that which
you do, does  not infringe upon and or violate the rights of any other". (AY ©)

22nd February 2002, new submissions to the Prime Minister
http://human-rights.demon.co.uk/ <<< web-site closed March 2006
To: The Prime Minister Fax:   (020) 7295 - 0918
From: Andrew Yiannides - founder of h-r Date:   22nd February 2002
Re: Institutionalised CRIME / FRAUD Pages:   TWO including this cover
CC: Community On Line - Folder Reference:   22FETEFA
¨ Urgent ¨ For Review ¨ Please Comment ¨ Please Reply ¨ Please Recycle

MESSAGE

To who it may concern - PRIORITY ISSUES

Attached copy-paste of an email sent to the treasury covering the most unacceptable of institutionalised - organised FRAUD. The practices covered are unacceptable and most certainly cannot continue as non-events. No sooner had an explicit affidavit been lodged at a county court because of abuse of 'the court facilities' for fraudulent conversion of housing benefit funds (covered in the National Scandal pages) and the Bill of Rights was announced, in 1997.

We expect of the government that promised in 1995 to deal with the "Fraud In The Legal System" to attend to the issues raised in the posting and the facts covered in our pages. We expect justice to be delivered here, at home, to our own citizens in keeping with the well-known adage "Charity/JUSTICE begins at home".

We expect of the media to deal with the issues and to publish the facts and the realities. We expect editors to tell the truth and to cease covering the rampant fraud and corruption that is organised through and by public servants and bodies. We expect of all to note the assured arrogance of public servants who assert that 'their activities will and can be sanctioned through the relevant courts'. We cover such 'boasting' in our pages and any concerned civil servant or reporter is invited to seek any additional information after visiting our pages.

Andrew Yiannides
* human-rights * NGO
London - UK
22 February 2002

The e-mail to the Treasury: -

"Further to my enquiry earlier today I wish to re-iterate that through abuse of public office billions of tax revenue is wasted through the scheme covered at:

http://www.human-rights.demon.co.uk/confraud.htm <<<< New URL embedded in link

Through an ongoing case that I have been following very closely, for over 15 months now, I can furnish all necessary information to a senior officer. However I MUST EMPHASISE that most DEFINITELY I am not prepared to deal with any person attached to and or operating out of the Lord Chancellor's department and office, the den of it all. Access also:

http://www.human-rights.demon.co.uk/thefacts.htm#Exhibit_3 <<<< NEW URLembedded in link

There were other instances when solicitors and COUNTY COURT staff and OFFICERS, purportedly acting as public servants were doing so, WITHIN THE LAW. The latter, allegedly, as judicious persons and not just as judicial chair occupants. All, contemptuous of the law, indulging in rampant fraud with the police playing footsie when the crimes, INCLUDING FORGERIES, were reported to 'such public servants' who are operating, allegedly within our law and order founded, alleged, democracy'.

I would appreciate confirmation upon receipt and beg to refer you to the NATIONAL SCANDAL pages at human-rights. There the free-for-all, through abuse of the Housing Benefit funds is covered. From 800 million to over 4.5 billion. Within 3 years the miraculous re-calculation and or re-appraisal of the blunt corruption at and through the local authorities and publicly funded organisations.

The explicit page / file covering the abuse of the courts' facilities by those who are meant to administer parliament's and other law, commands immediate attention. In the meantime consider carefully the four quotes in our HomePage. The conclusion in 1972/1975 was confirmed in 1984/1986 and better still through two high profile fraud cases that raise many questions as to the selective application of facilities at the disposal of the 'incompetent' (to put it mildly) in control of it all.

Sincerely

Andrew Yiannides
*human-rights* NGO
London - UK
21 February 2002

PS. I have been researching the corruption and fraudulent abuse of the courts' facilities for over 30 years, and in the circumstances treat this communication accordingly. In 1995, through submissions to the Prime Minister-in-waiting, I qualified from an appropriate response covering "The FRAUD IN THE LEGAL SYSTEM". At least three alleged victims who were co-operating in the *confraud.htm* scenarios targeted me and my work and two others attempted to draw me in such vile scenarios.

Copy of the letter from the government in waiting with attached promises will be sent presently to the Prime Minister as a reminder and as an antecedent to publication of the succinct letter on the Internet.

When the National Health service and Education are crying out for funds the billions wasted through fraud and salaries on and for incompetent police forces, whose main pre-occupation is TO CREATE TANGENT EXERCISES as the Lawrence murder Inquiry (to and for which the author of this communication made explicit submissions) the state should ensure that ALL ABUSE AND FRAUD, when reported, by concerned citizens, is dealt with, expeditiously and DILIGENTLY. Access also:

http://www.human-rights.demon.co.uk/natinscan.htm#where_the_will_the_way

and consider carefully the succinct letter to the Home Secretary, at the time. More material can and will be published in due course for it is time to cease treating Mr and Mrs Average as the old age pensioner in the same page.

--

webmaster@human-rights.demon.co.uk (NOTE: change of email address as link creates)

Human-Rights Organisation
Non Governmental Organisation
Promoting and Protecting
Human Rights World Wide
Go To: http://members.human-rights.org 
JOIN the COMMUNITY ON LINE
NOTE: A USA corporation contracted with Mr Andrew Yiannides, the founder & creator of the Human-Rights Community on Line. Under the terms of the agreement the corporation was to provide free web-site (space of 20 megabyte per signed up member). Among the contracted facilities the USA corporation was to provide full provisions, from email accounts for each member under their signed up web-site domain name@xxx.human-rights.org, newsletter postings from the centre, a member's lobby area with facil8ty for a latest developments notice board and much more. From the onset the engineers of the USA corporation were blocking Newsletters from reaching members and were failing to release to Mr A Yiannides (owner of the domain name *human-rights.org*) information about new members joining.

Remember:
"Do for, by and with yourself that which satisfies you, so long as that which
you do, does  not infringe upon and or violate the rights of any other". (AY ©)

Submissions to the Home Secretary / Home Office, also, on 22nd February 2002
http://www.human-rights.demon.co.uk/ <<< web-site closed March 2006
To: The Home Secretary Fax: (020) 7219 - 5903
From: Andrew Yiannides - founder of h-r Date: 22nd February 2002
Re: Institutionalised CRIME / FRAUD Pages: TWO including this cover
CC: Community On Line - Folder Reference: 22FETEFA
¨ Urgent ¨ For Review ¨ Please Comment ¨ Please Reply ¨ Please Recycle
MESSAGE

To who it may concern - PRIORITY ISSUES

Attached copy-paste of an email sent to the treasury covering the most unacceptable of institutionalised - organised FRAUD. The practices covered are unacceptable and most certainly cannot continue as non-events. No sooner had an explicit affidavit been lodged at a county court because of abuse of 'the court facilities' for fraudulent conversion of housing benefit funds (covered in the National Scandal pages) and the Bill of Rights was announced, in 1997. (*F2)

We expect of the government that promised in 1995 to deal with the "Fraud In The Legal System" to attend to the issues raised in the posting and the facts covered in our pages. We expect justice to be delivered here, at home, to our own citizens in keeping with the well-known adage "Charity/JUSTICE begins at home".

We expect of the media to deal with the issues and to publish the facts and the realities. We expect editors to tell the truth and to cease covering the rampant fraud and corruption that is organised through and by public servants and bodies. We expect of all to note the assured arrogance of public servants who assert that 'their activities will and can be sanctioned through the relevant courts'. We cover such 'boasting' in our pages and any concerned civil servant or reporter is invited to seek any additional information after visiting our pages.

Andrew Yiannides
* human-rights * NGO
London - UK
22 February 2002

The e-mail to the Treasury: -

"Further to my enquiry earlier today I wish to re-iterate that through abuse of public office billions of tax revenue is wasted through the scheme covered at:

http://www.human-rights.demon.co.uk/confraud.htm <<<<< New URL embedded in Link

Through an ongoing case that I have been following very closely, for over 15 months now, I can furnish all necessary information to a senior officer. However I MUST EMPHASISE that most DEFINITELY I am not prepared to deal with any person attached to and or operating out of the Lord Chancellor's department and office, the den of it all. Access also:

http://www.human-rights.demon.uk.uk/thefacts.htm#Exhibit_3 <<<< New URL embedded in link

There were other instances when solicitors and COUNTY COURT staff and OFFICERS, purportedly acting as public servants were doing so, WITHIN THE LAW. The latter, allegedly, as judicious persons and not just as judicial chair occupants. All, contemptuous of the law, indulging in rampant fraud with the police playing footsie when the crimes, INCLUDING FORGERIES, were reported to 'such public servants' who are operating, allegedly within our law and order founded, alleged, democracy'.

I would appreciate confirmation upon receipt and beg to refer you to the NATIONAL SCANDAL pages at human-rights. There the free-for-all, through abuse of the Housing Benefit funds is covered. From 800 million to over 4.5 billion. Within 3 years the miraculous re-calculation and or re-appraisal of the blunt corruption at and through the local authorities and publicly funded organisations.

The explicit page / file covering the abuse of the courts' facilities by those who are meant to administer parliament's and other law, commands immediate attention. In the meantime consider carefully the four quotes in our HomePage. The conclusion in 1972/1975 was confirmed in 1984/1986 and better still through two high profile fraud cases that raise many questions as to the selective application of facilities at the disposal of the 'incompetent' (to put it mildly) in control of it all.

Sincerely

Andrew Yiannides
*human-rights* NGO
London - UK
21 February 2002

PS. I have been researching the corruption and fraudulent abuse of the courts' facilities for over 30 years, and in the circumstances treat this communication accordingly. In 1995, through submissions to the Prime Minister-in-waiting, I qualified from an appropriate response covering "The FRAUD IN THE LEGAL SYSTEM". At least three alleged victims who were co-operating in the *confraud.htm* scenarios targeted me and my work and two others attempted to draw me in such vile scenarios.

Copy of the letter from the government in waiting with attached promises will be sent presently to the Prime Minister as a reminder and as an antecedent to publication of the succinct letter on the Internet.

When the National Health service and Education are crying out for funds the billions wasted through fraud and salaries on and for incompetent police forces, whose main pre-occupation is TO CREATE TANGENT EXERCISES as the Lawrence murder Inquiry (to and for which the author of this communication made explicit submissions) the state should ensure that ALL ABUSE AND FRAUD, when reported, by concerned citizens, is dealt with, expeditiously and DILIGENTLY. Access also:

http://www.human-rights.demon.co.uk/natinscan.htm#where_the_will_the_way <<<< New URL embedded in link

and consider carefully the succinct letter to the Home Secretary, at the time. More material can and will be published in due course for it is time to cease treating Mr and Mrs Average as the old age pensioner in the same page.

--

webmaster@human-rights.demon.co.uk (NOTE: As of March 2007 change of email address / link creates new email address)

Human-Rights Organisation
Non Governmental Organisation
Promoting and Protecting
Human Rights World Wide
Go To: http://members.human-rights.org 
JOIN the COMMUNITY ON LINE
NOTE: A USA corporation contracted with Mr Andrew Yiannides, the founder & creator of the Human-Rights Community on Line. Under the terms of the agreement the corporation was to provide free web-site (space of 20 megabyte per signed up member). Among the contracted facilities the USA corporation was to provide full provisions, from email accounts for each member under their signed up web-site domain name@xxx.human-rights.org, newsletter postings from the centre, a member's lobby area with facilities for the latest developments, a notice board and much more. From the onset the engineers of the USA corporation were blocking Newsletters from reaching members and were failing to provide to Mr A Yiannides (owner of the domain name *human-rights.org*) full information about all members and new members joining the Community.

Remember:
"Do for, by and with yourself alone, that which satisfies and pleases you, so long
as you do not infringe upon and or violate the rights of any other".

Below, Mr Andrew Yiannides's submissions to the abuser of his time. Like others who were introduced by the LIPS crowd/mob she benefited from much which she secured under false pretences. Throughout she defaulted to act as had been agreed and warranted (*F1). She failed to respond to a number of communications that were called for, following her part in vile attempts to create and use / rely on a false instrument. She took part in the attempt and she was seen to have been willing and prepared to partake in such activities in addition to the numerous and 'convenient defaults & omissions' that she 'engaged in'. Some are covered in the document which she received but, like an ostrich, she ignored it all by shoving her head in the sand; typical of such arrogant fraudsters, 'who are relying on the criminals who use them for the institutionally organised fraud on the taxpayers, to ******* them' (*Hint - cryptic).

*Link from here to the exclusive page where we expose her parts and those she was co-operating with, as a typical fraudsters-club-recruit / hopeful and as a maintenance engineer of the system as is.

The explicit Fax from http://www.human-rights.demon.co.uk/ (NOTE: website at demon.co.uk closed March 2006)
To: Mrs V. B. Foden (Prop CoL) Fax: 01752-519-416
From: Andrew Yiannides Date: 29 May 2001
Re: Chasing instead of challenging! Pages: TEN with this cover
CC: Community On Line (File) File as: Ref: 29MCBFTA
¨ Urgent ¨ For Review ¨ Please Comment ¨ Please Reply ¨ Please Recycle
MESSAGE
 

Dear Beryl

From the onset I made very clear the way forward. Ever since it has been chasing, chasing, chasing and appeal, appeal, appeal, EXCEPT:

1. When I came to Plymouth and the court was caused to reinstate the struck out action against the initial solicitors who organised the CONSTRUCTIVE frauds, on you, when you went to them with your parents with the family plan and agreement for the care of your parents. AND THEN: -
a.

  b.
c.

As with the previous RCJ hearing I asked you to apply for, and SECURE a transcript of the hearing for the very same reasons that I stated earlier.
As with the RCJ hearing before (when solicitors came in at the last minute) you received no transcripts for months.

AND THEN, the solicitors acting FOR the bankrupt SIF, and defending the solicitors you took action against, begun to assert that you did not have the case restored, blah, blah. Nothing but the usual indulgences, BECAUSE There was no pressure by you to receive the requested TRANSCRIPTS. In other words the usual DOING IT THEIR WAY through denial of your rights.
2. AFTER they mess you about for months and fail to deliver the TRANSCRIPTS I PROVIDE YOU WITH the guns you need in order to cause the dreamers to land on Terra Firma and I dictate and check a letter YOU SHOULD SEND. And you did so, after I made some minor changes to the letter/fax you prepared from my submissions as faxed. [*Link to a page where we expose a victim working with the criminals in control]
a. HEY PRESTO, the dreamers after the explicit demand with the attached ‘LAND ON TERRA FIRMA DREAMERS’ the transcripts denied to you, for almost four months, DO materialise out of the blue with interestingly BACK DATED ORDERS!!!
3. Other transcripts do not reach you and we have more of the usual scenarios. The solicitors who were in charge of your affairs and for months negating and defaulting to act in any manner, TO CHALLENGE THE WRONGS you were subjected to, APPLY TO HAVE THEMSELVES removed from the record. Nothing unusual!!! You receive and inform me of their arrangements at the last minute. You are to attend the High Court for their PURPOSES AS YOU ALLOWED them to benefit from, care of defaults to challenge any of the offenders OPENLY!!!
a.

 


b.

 


c.

d.

And when I attend court with you, you do not have the affidavit they send you only a couple of days earlier IN SUPPORT OF THEIR APPLICATION to be removed from the records WHILE A HEARING WAS IMMINENT AND TO TAKE PLACE A WEEK LATER before the full court of Appeal and the head of the family division!!! Common sense makes it abundantly clear that there can be no RELATIONSHIP BY FORCE. And the solicitors, having indulged in theatre earlier, proved they also that they were READY, WILLING AND CAPABLE OF DUMPING YOU to act on your own!
I was able to speak for you (after the way I introduced myself to the court earlier on, and I picked up on the relevant issues and points when I ALSO POINTED OUT TO THE COURT that the failure to send to you their affidavit for over five weeks WAS IN ITSELF AN ACT OF OBSTRUCTING JUSTICE and lumbering you with another SEARCH FOR A SOLICITOR at the last second – and I pointed out to the court that their tactics were but the usual OBSTRUCTIONS TO JUSTICE by professionals who knew of the fact that such activities / defaults were CRIMINAL OFFENCES.
The dreamers and abusers, in the usual manner, came prepared to ask for something like £1700 costs – for more conversion of assts to alleged use of legitimate Legal Aid LOAN FACILITIES for constructive frauds through deceptions and defaults by the score.
THE OFFENDING SOLICITORS did not get their cost Order as you know and they were running mad to bring to court and to deliver to you your bundles of documents, that would be needed for the hearing the following week!!!
4. We then HAD the ‘invitation before the Court of Appeal that Lord Justice Thorpe was meant to be sitting on as part of the full bench. But as it turned out later he was not.. AGAIN I CAME PREPARED and I organised things from your end, MY WAY. I denied the actors and directors their usual scenarios.
a.


b.

c.

 

 

d.

‘No Admittance! PRIVATE!!’ Arrangements for a hearing pertaining to financial matters in divorce proceedings, to be treated as secret and behind closed doors in CONTRAVENTION OF ARTICLE 6 of the ECoHR. And I handled the usher MY WAY and the sign was removed with three LAW STUDENTS thereafter encouraged by me to feel free and to walk in to watch / follow the proceedings.
AND I LET YOU go into court on your own. I did, after all, pretend to have just been standing by, sorting papers when I met with you outside the court and challenged the ‘No Admittance’ sign on the door, indicating also an interest in the case.

AND YOU CAME OUT almost in tears because Mr Meek QC your husband’s barrister had been shouting at you for daring take out a recorder to record the proceedings. You know I stayed out a little longer BEFORE I WALKED IN to join you at the front bench AND TOOK OUT MY OWN CASSETTE RECORDER which caused you to tell me off because your opponent’s barrister was objecting to having a recording of the proceedings. I made sure that he could see certain printed material in my attaché case WHILE I was informing you that I would be giving you a couple of pages FROM THE INTERNET. I made sure that he heard that and that you would be referring the pages to the bench, should there be obstructions to you recording the hearing for the day.
And the bench WAS GIVEN the two succinct pages from the Internet. Lady Butler Sloss and Lord Parker conceding to your right to record.
5. In the course of the hearing / proceedings, for the day, the bench made it very clear that they were expecting your husband to transfer the half of the matrimonial property to you. They stipulated that THEY COULD NOT POSSIBLY ACCEPT that DJ Wigmore could possibly have MEANT, after all the other benefits your husband had apparently secured over the lengthy case, that he would also keep his share until he receives funds for it in order to transfer that interest to you. Mr Meek indicated that he had no instructions from his client (not the instructing solicitors, HIS WORDS) and even though he was told that the bench simply expected your husband to transfer his half to you WITHOUT ANY DEMANDS FOR MONEY (as ordered by DJ Wigmore). And, to come back to the court for their Lordships to look into the other issues you laboured with my assistance, at times stopping you from labouring on wrong issues, AS YOU SHOULD REMEMBER.
6. I SUCCINCTLY asked of you to transcribe the recording of the hearing. YOU DEFAULTED to do so. Instead we have had more scripts and scenarios as with the ‘no transcripts about the re-instated case against the original offenders in your long journey to Ithaca. (Ulysses sailing back HOME to his kingdom, to his family after the Trojan wars. And you, back to your rights in law and to YOUR PEACE OF MIND).
a.


b.

c.

 


d.

We have had the written promises AND CONDITIONS by Mr Meek, on behalf of your husband WHILE YOU SHOULD BE CHASING and preparing matters, issues and accounts AS I GUIDED YOU. You in the process arguing that there was no such Order by the court!!!
Why DO YOU THINK I ASKED FOR YOU TO proceed with a transcript IMMEDIATELY and to deal with the valuations and other essential issues attached to the matrimonial assets?
YOU DID proceed with the affidavit that would be needed for the hearing before the CoA about the financial issues,. You defaulted to refer it to me, read it yesterday when I telephoned you and indicated that we had until the 19th of July to deal with the issues arising. In other words NO PREPARATION whatsoever until the last minute, as usual. And thereafter repetitions of the type of activities by the other sides attached to defaults by the other side, obstructions to your rights and you defaulting to take any steps IN ADVANCE IN ORDER TO ENSURE THAT YOUR RIGHTS ARE PROTECTED!!!
I am transmitting copy of the Press Release by > http://crookjudges.human-rights.org < and I suggest that you consider the introduction by me, TO THAT CHALLENGER’S WORK, for and with others in mind too!!!
7. NOW CONSIDER the above facts and many other issues that I was called upon to witness and partake in.
a.


b.

 

Could I ever, to this day, submit to other members of the Community On Line anything in connection with the vile attempts you expect me to relish in when in fact you are frustrating my every effort and every RIGHT WAY TO PROCEED, simply because you wish to do things the way the offenders are used to and they have also trained you to accept, as a victim of their abuse of public office?
Just consider the letter from Louise Whatever from the CoA you quoted from today. WHERE IS THE TRANSCRIPT that I could have simply pointed to and in particular to the relevant parts for reference to the waffle YOU PROMOTED TO ME today? Relentless promotions and quotes from the theatrical scripts you receive and others create. THEIR activities as allowed by you and without any semblance to your rights in law and or to the events that gave and give rise to the never ending waffle I am caused to listen to! WHERE IS the waffle the script writers produced for you to promote after you send the succinct and clear message in the FAX that produced instead the TRANSCRIPT that made it very clear that YOUR CASE against the solicitors had been reinstated and was being allowed to proceed to hearing. And I was to assist you to transfer out of the jurisdiction of the offenders after you would secure your transcripts? The facts and the law were and are but inescapable. YET YOU PREFER TO allow others to be in command as IF IT IS THEIR CLAIMS AND APPLICATIONS the court is called upon to deal with, NOT YOURS!!!
Beryl YOU CANNOT EXPECT: -
I.
II.

 

III.


IV.

 

MIRACLES from the offenders who already stitched you up umpteen times.
Nor can you rely on any other public servant to do any act that is likely to restore your rights at and in any court unless YOU ACT IN AN APPROPRIATE MANNER. And the appropriate manner, I refer to, does not happen to be doing it their way, which may or may not include elements of ‘see a solicitor’ as the letter you received from one of the architects of the destruction of yours and every other citizen’s rights.
ME to be for ever chasing the rubbish you receive and promote to me which is not based on YOUR RIGHTS AT COURT, THE LAW and the DOCUMENTED EVIDENCE I should have been allowed to use against the offenders in order to move forward in and with your problems.
ME TO BE FOLLOWING IN YOUR FOOTSTEPS just because you so choose to do. The offenders have damaged and ruined MANY FAMILIES and I am most concerned with the thousand of others. YOU APPEAR NOT TO BE CONCERNED WITH such issues and other persons which includes my mother, my sister, my niece to whom I dedicated the *human-rights * web site not to mention the four innocent children of Mr William Spring and my own innocent children.

I do think that you must reflect and consider the fact that I have been obstructed from promoting the successes and the FORCING OF HANDS on the offenders!

WHY?

Why is it that other victims get on with challenging the offenders OPENLY?

WHY IS IT that in your case, as with the split personality Johan, I am simply caused to hear of and swallow nothing but waffle from public servants who do know that they are acting in breach of their public duties? WHY DO YOU THINK THEY RUSHED OUT the transcript after the explicit fax?

MUCH WORSE, why do you simply ignore the fact THAT THEY ARE ACTING IN CONTEMPT OF THE LAW and the EVIDENCE?

AND, IF YOU ACCEPT THE ABOVE, Why have I been obstructed from dealing with the issues through defaults and omissions that do not rest at my door?

IF you accept my frustration at bureaucracy’s door YOU WILL ACCEPT that I do not accept that I have to be tied to the chairs others, through you, seek to tie me. You either proceed with publication of the facts and the evidence or you go on wasting your years in the courts, DOING IT HEIR WAY until you are six foot under, like many others, or you waste the rest of your life in the theatres of ABDUCTED JUSTICE (the Goddess). They carry on feeling free, with your license, to rape her daily except when challenged appropriately as you already experience and know, MY WAY! The LETTER FAX finished with a promise!!! Almost two months later I cannot send out a Newsletter or Press Release as with Mr William Spring !!!

Sincerely

Andrew Yiannides
(human-rights.org - Registered In the USA)
Publishing the facts of life on the Internet
Victims ACTING & USING THEIR RIGHTS IN INTERNATIONAL LAW

FOOTNOTE common to most web-pages at this website
MOST IMPORTANT:- In October 2010, the coalition Government's Attorney General, in an interview published by 'COUNSEL' the mothly legal banter magazine, specifically spoke of the police distancing themselves from cases of (small-fry) fraud and he asserted that he was making that element his department's priority*

*Link from here to the evidence.

IT REMAINS TO BE SEEN, WHAT the coalition of the Con-LibDems, THE GOVERNMENT OF THE DAY WILL IN FACT ATTEND TO THE RAMPANT FRAUD, and IF IT WILL DEAL with the criminals who abuse public office, especially when faced with appropriate submissions and claims that will be delivered in due course. Visitors/readers are urged to read the article published in the London Evening Standard, as settled by the Rt. Hon. David Blunkett, Home Secretary in 2003
*Link from here to the article we reproduce in another webpage and consider "Why tolerate the arrogance of the legal circles who had and have the audacity to assert to the lawmakers that they, the lawmakers have nothing to do with the law"?
While there, above it, the explicit letter to ex-Minister, the Rt. Hon. Frank Field MP, delivered a few days earlier. ALL alleged victim-challengers who contacted Andrew Yiannides, by the time the letter was sent to the Minister, received copy of the letter just as they received copies of other letters submitted to government maintained Ministers and other official appointees to public office. Accessing the material pointed to from the letter (URLs) is of utmost importance. It should assist 'recognition of the citizen's rights at work', when called upon properly in truly democratic states. The above in 2003; there were other 'submissions' and among such civilised and, within the law, approaches by citizens that led to the right actions by governments, the explicit challenges when we set about exposing one of the most evil of alleged victims of the legal circles to have ever contacted us.

*Link from here to our explicit submissions to (a) the Prime Minister, (b) the Chancellor / Treasury, (c) and, the Home Secretary. We acted so after we had secured more than enough evidence about the parts of an alleged victim whose only interests were (i) the rewards under the table FOR KEEPING QUIET about the ORGANISED FRAUD THROUGH ABUSE OF THE COURTS' FACILITIES and (ii) her parts in blunt attempts that were intended to discredit the person she was sent along to mess about with, Mr Andrew Yiannides.

Access please the letter to the Home Secretary, the Rt. Hon. Jack Straw, in December 1998

*Link from here to the letter

& note the results evinced in the newspaper article (Hornsey Journal) also within days of the letter reaching its destination. Many the charlatans and stooges -lovers and 'promoters of the system as is'- on the job for decades; one and all acting as sold souls always do

*Link from here to the evidence we point to relative to the parts of one of a number of sold to the system fraudsters who were sent along / introduced to Andrew Yiannides by the managers / organisers of the LIPS crowd / mob..

PAGE FOOTNOTES:-

    1.    From the onset the actress stipulated and agreed with us that she needed to and 'she was going to put pressure on the abusive of public office', by going on line. She had been the victim of the usual constructive frauds and she was going, she asserted, to publish the evidence  against them all, from solicitors to police and the courts. SHE DID NOT ACT SO, while she carried on aiming for the carrot at the end of the tunnel [*Link to the arrangements in place intended to corrupt and entrap morons]. With the funds Andrew saved her, the cost the link points to, she was asked to buy a computer and to cease promoting the luck of funds as her excuse. YET SHE DID NOTHING FOR MONTHS while working with the criminals in control of the justice/legal system in futile attempts all intended to use against Mr Yiannides in order to discredit us. Their final act proved to have been the most naive of all; a court order was issued by Circuit Judge Ovenden at Plymouth County Court; reference was made in the order to the presence of Mr Andrew Yiannides at 'the theatrical production', when the actress interestingly failed to ask for and insist for permission to benefit from assistance by litigation friend, Mr Yiannides who was dragged to Plymouth for the umpteenth time in order to witness the actress' lousy performance, as usual. Apparently the reference, in the order to Mr Andrew Yiannides, was not for him to know the details of as the actress determined PROVING HER PARTS, IN FRAUDULENT SCHEMES, for the last time as Mr Yiannides on his part determined. [*Link from here to the challenges warranted, with exposures to follow. In a long telephone call from the Court Manager at Plymouth Combined Courts, the manger stated that NO Order (as received by the fraud of an alleged human - Mrs. Veronica Beryl Foden) was on record, such as I demanded copy of. Apparently the order was not on file in the court's records irrespective of the one the actress received and referred to me upon receipt through the post; better still irrespective of the fact the creation and existence of such a document was confirmed by the solicitor who was acting on instructions from the Solicitors Indemnity Fund, to defend the action against the solicitors who set the wheels in motion for the constructive frauds imposed on 'the actress' by the legal circles. The instigated constructive frauds naturally were intended to lead to an application to the European Court of Human Rights with the consequential rewards to 'fraudsters' who agree to act as alleged blackmailed victims IRRESPECTIVE OF THE FACT that they are fully aware that the rewards are from plundered (through such schemes) from taxpayers contributions to the national budget'].
    2.    Victims, visitors, readers and researchers who have not accessed the Appeal Lodged at Edmonton County Court, in 1997, should do so from here. The Appeal was in respect of blunt & unacceptable fraudulent abuse of the court's facilities, in a matter of an inexcusable attempt, by Enfield Council, to claw back £165 Housing Benefit from targeted private landlords; their property had been occupied by a person whose claim for Social Security assistance, with his rent, HAD BEEN APPROVED BY PUBLIC SERVANTS. The claim was simply another instance when judicial chair occupants were relied upon to go about INDULGING IN ARROGANT FRAUD on the citizens, hand in hand with the staff and officers of the Local Authority, Enfield Council. Needless to say the abusers of the court's facilities did act in contempt of the law, in contempt of the evidence and IN CONTEMPT OF THE RULES OF PROCEDURE AT COURT, too. Nothing unusual, as far as such activities and practices go. *All visitors who access the Appeal shall read of the challenges that caused the Government to announce the Bill of Rights AFTER the challenges of the court & Government, in the lodged Appeal.. *All visitors SHOULD ALSO *access from here the issues pointed to one Mike Rye, acting Mayor of Enfield Council in 2008, when he and the Local Authority he represented were pointed to the very convenient failures by successive UK governments to introduce any Act of Parliament enshrining the European Convention on Human Rights, until the challenges; in 1997, through the appeal we point to from this footnote. The failures to introduce any Act of Parliament for almost 50 years, despite the fact the United Kingdom was instrumental in drafting the Articles and one of the first States / Counties to sign up to the Convention. With such challenges and results, pointed to countless (alleged) victim-challengers Treating the Convention as non-existent with the judiciary foot loose and free to indulge in blunt denial of rights and fraud on the taxpayers was and remained one of the most offensive of FRAUDS ON THE CITIZENS & RESIDENTS OF THE UNITED KINGDOM, between 1948-1950 & 1998. And we have had to endure all manner of vile promotions by lovers of the blunt constructive fraud on the taxpayers, because the converts to the institutionally organised fraud on the taxpayers, have been objecting the disclosures / exposures by us, of such persons, details of which visitors to our pages can access from the list of pages below. Readers & researchers can access from here challenges and POINTERS TO PROVISIONS, which two other foul of the law Local Authorities were pointed after their staff and officers indulged in similar manner, both of which targeted the same private landlords. Of such realities, challenges and estopels to abusers of public office, and the courts facilities, were pointed to / reported to ALL OF THE DREAMERS we expose as lovers of the rampant fraud and corruption through the courts & ONE & ALL shoved such realities in the caves where they congregate to plan their parts in the plundering of the taxpayers contributions to the national fund / budget as we cover and expose in the exclusive page all treated and carry on treating an non existent or as if the facts stated constitute non-events.
    3.    xxx
    4.    xxx
    5.    xxx

...

READ the letter from an Old Age Pensioner below and  penltrf.jpg (64489 bytes)
think of others such as the targeted citizens who challenged appropriately the attempts of 'public servants to steal from them their rights to their legal properties' [*Link to]

3minvtef.jpg (108339 bytes) 60mlafr1.jpg (84384 bytes) 4bnfrbsf.jpg (91111 bytes)
The author of the aricle and the editor, both promoters of half-baked potatoes were offered evidence to the effect that the taxpayers were / are faced with arrogant abuse of trust & bluntly orgnaised FRAUD ON THE TAXPAYERS, in other words sucker-serfs

 

800mhbfr.jpg (48618 bytes)

Back to HomePage   Back To Top of Page- Key  

 

The creator of this website was inviting victims to access URrights & join him there with other victims to expose & challenge abusers of trust & public office until the providers of the facilities >ning.com< introduced new terms and conditions for the provision of the facilities. Access from here and read of the imposed states by the brains behind ning.com and consider only one element "WHY OBSTRUCT & HINDER THE DOWNLOAD of the existing material at URrights.ning.com >the intellectual properties of the creator of that presence on the Internet and those who joined him there? Read below of the unacceptable conduct and behaviour by the reckless abusers of trust, who set out to obstruct and blackmail the creator of URrights.ning

Persons who are genuinely concerned and object to the ways they were / are being treated by alleged servants of the publicand the law >in any PSEUDOdemocracy, or whatever states / conditions they are subjected to< by abusers of public facilities and public office >as we cover in our web-pages< should contact webmaster@human-rights.org for information relevant to the creation of similar facilities for INFOrmation on URrights, for facilities for URrights EUrope and for a NETwork of URrights activists.

  • APOLOGIES to friends and persons who could not access URrights following the recent changes by the providers of the facility (ning.com) Andrew Yiannides created and used the portal to create the presence on the Internet for the group of victims / challengers who joined with him to expose and challenge the arrogant and blunt abuse of public services in all allegedly civilised societies > PSEUDODEMOCRACIES <.

  • The changes related to the introduction of charges for the facilities, included the facility for ning.com to archive the material at URrights; also the facility to download the archived material to the creator's system (computer) while the creator and his group of friends considered which of the level of charges and service the group was to adopt.

  • HOWEVER the creator, Andrew Yiannides, WAS UNABLE TO DOWNLOAD THE ARCHIVED MATERIAL and all attempts to engage the providers and their staff in reasonable explanation as to WHY THE FAILURES TO CONNECT / DOWNLOAD from the ning.com servers THE ARCHIVED MATERIAL, were contemptuously ignored.

  • Emails to the Publicity, to the Promotion, to the Public Relations, also to the Chief Executive's Office merited no response whatsoever from anyone acting for ning.com

  • In the circumstances Andrew will appreciate any information related to the problems covered above. Andrew will also appreciate any information relative to exchanges with or email postings, from ning.com to existing members.

  • EXISTING URrights members, victims of the legal system, victims of solicitors and the courts should access the updated pages at .org/solicitors.htm and .org/solfraud.htm by using the links from the list below.

Below pages where we expose known lovers of it all, users and maintenance engineers of the system as is

.org/1999dfax.htm .org/1ofmany.htm .org/2lipstalk.htm .org/4deceit.htm .org/absolute.htm .org/abusers.htm
.org/account4.htm .org/actors.htm .org/actors2.htm .org/adoko.htm .org/bankers.htm .org/beware.htm
.org/blunket1.htm .org/chaldep1.htm .org/confraud.htm .org/contract.htm .org/convicti.htm .org/courts.htm
.org/corruptcourts.htm .org/crimesin.htm .org/dreamers.htm .org/evesused.htm .org/evilones.htm .org/famfraud.htm
.org/govolso.htm .org/guesswhy.htm .org/len.htm .org/mauricek.htm .org/media.htm .org/solfraud.htm
.org/solicitors.htm .org/someplan.htm .org/someploy.htm .org/thefacts.htm .org/theproof.htm .org/thenerve.htm
.org/twisted.htm .org/uaccount.htm .org/ukmm.htm .org/uwatchit.htm .org/watchit1.htm .org/yourtax.htm
  • Every single person we name and expose in the above pages elected to ignore THEIR OBLIGATIONS TO REPORT (to 'the serfs' = 'the taxpayers'), THE ABUSERS OF PUBLIC OFFICE & PUBLIC FACILITIES. All were/are relying on the Intellectual Prostitutes, from within the media, to keep it all in the family closet.
  • All, as typical twin-tongue hypocrites carry on complaining about the media for failing to report & for suppressing the facts and the realities they allegdely reported to the hard of hearing, to the otherwise committed angels blowing their silent trumpets for decades, all ready and gearing to welcome the expansion of the New World Order.
  • Of such parts the contributions from and failings of the persons we name and expose, AS IF THEIR OWN SILENCE, THEIR FAILURES  & THEIR BLUNT OBSTRUCTIONS to the work and other actions by the creator of this website, Andrew Yiannides, treated by one and all as if non-existent with the exception when the wily Norman Scarth, set off to abuse the trust he was allowed to benefit from, while his parts and questionable activities / performance were under scrutiny, specifically after HE FAILED to publish the full transcript of the Court of Appeal hearing HE WAS ALLOWED TO RECORD* [*Link from here to the food for thought page created by Andrew Yiannides, in the first instance].
  • Not one ever bothered to address the issues we expose in the explicit page, despite the fact that we have been pointing all of our contacts, since May 1992, to it all.
  • Visitors, readers and researchers are urged / invited to access and read the letter which the Hon. Secretary of the Litigants In Person Society, Mr. Norman Scarth sent to the founder of human-rights, Mr. Andrew Yiannides, reproduced in the page .org/4deceit.htm* [*L]
  • The author's statements, such as 'what for and why seek additional assistance', thereby spelling out his parts as a lover of it all.
  • Common sense dictates, that he should have directed his request to his partners in deceptions aplenty, one & all engaging in fraudulent misrepresentations AND NOTED TO HAVE, WILFULLY, BEEN SUPPRESSING, FROM THE TAXPAYERS, THE FACTS OF LIFE RELATIVE TO THE RAMPANT ABUSE OF THE COURTS FACILITIES as the failure of all to co-operate as covered and pointed to at:- [*L]. One and all fallen to the facilities for fraud aplenty on the taxpayers and the corruption of illiterates in law, the conditioned victims of the legal circles & courts who fall to the blackmail element attached to the REWARD for keeping the realities away from the taxpayers; just like the media and the Ministers responsible for the application of long existing law to the criminal activities we cover in our pages, do.
  • All the while one and all were / are engaging in the scenarios we cover in the exclusive page, which page the author of the letter which Mr Norman Scarth sent to Andrew Yiannides, afforded us the opportunity to address the issue of the contributions of his partners and affiliates in fraud aplenty on the taxpayers; despite the reminder one and all, named in the new page simply shoved it all in the dark corners of their devoid of grey matter skulls, their perverted / corrupted mind(s)

> MOST IMPORTANT <
On Sunday morning, the 19th September 2010, the Deputy Prime Minister, leader of the Liberal-Democrats in the course of the BBC TV politics programme, spoke of the coalition government's commitment to address the element of waste and fraud through the public services sector. We trust and hope that the elements we expose in our pages and the parts adopted by the conditioned victims of the legal circles, the persons who engage in PROMOTING & EXPANDING THE ONGOING CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUD ON THE TAXPAYERS, THROUGH ABUSE OF THE COURTS' FACILITIES, will be on the top of the list of government priorities.
Visitors, readers & researchers are urged to access the letters to Minister Frank Field [*L] after he had been directed by the Prime Minister to think/do the unthinkable.
Link also from here [*L] to the explicit letter to the Home Secretary in December 1998 with submissions arising out of the RAMPANT HOUSING BENEFIT FRAUD
On Tuesday 23rd November 2010, 'the Guardian' in its Comment & Debate page carried an article by Nick Clegg, the Deputy Prime Minister. In the evening of the same day the Deputy Prime Minister addressed a large audience at Kings place in respect of the government's changes on university students fees / loans.
Access from here the page where we reproduce an image of 'the Guardian' article & consider the simple fact that we, alone, have been asserting and proclaiming our objections to the theft of funds from the national budget leading to the ever-increasing annual deficit in the state's balance of payments.

ACCESS:  http://www.justice-uk.human-rights.org/ (For an important message at this Community-on-Line web-site) & thereafter,
Access also http://www.law.society.complaints.and.human-rights.org/ (Judge instigates Fraud On Tax Payers - he knows not the difference between 'imposed' & 'no undue influence'). APOLOGIES FOR THE DISAPPEARANCE OF THIS WEBSITE.It appears that the beneficiary of the work, both for applications to the courts in the United Kingdom and the submissions to the European Court for Human Rights* [*Link from here to the Statement of Facts submitted to the ECoHR], arranged with the providers of the free web space to erase the Intellectual Property of Andrew Yiannides, the founder of the human-rights Community-on-Line, without any reference to the creator of the website and owner of the Intellectual Property!
© Copyright subsists on all material in our web-site, owned by the authors of same.
Visitors can refer to these pages in any non commercial activity, so long as attribution is given as to source. License to use, for commercial or other specific use of the material, shall have been secured in writing first, from the owners of any property and material from these pages. No material shall be reproduced in any form and by any means without prior agreement and or license in writing from the copyright owners. The Press are invited to contact us if they wish to publish material in the Public Interest, As We Do.
For any problems or questions regarding this web-site contact:  webmaster
...