h-rtitle.gif (7604 bytes)

Crime - Organised - Institutionalised - Corruption - Fraud - Protection Rackets, run and managed by judicial chair occupants, in a free-for-all state of abundance. Note below the arrangements between the administrative, the judiciary and the media; read of the all-embracing guarantee in place, in contempt of all law : the root shall be pointed to.

WHERE IS JUSTICE? Read below:-

"The court has inherent jurisdiction to stay an action which must fail; as, for instance an action brought in respect of an act of State"

*Link from here to founder's tribulations in 1972-75 and marvel at the creativity of allegedly honourable officers of Justice and the Law in the mother of all PSEUDOdemocracies

  • And by extension any act of any public servant who is appointed, retained and maintained by other public servants for all of whom, the state, as employer, is ultimately responsible, including abusers of judicial chair occupancy. Hence, the billions paid out as covered in the affidavit which visitors can link to directly from here [*Link].
  • Link also from here to the founder's conclusions as of 1972-75 when the great Metropolitan police were seen to be nothing but accessories to and abettors of the rampant fraud and corruption through the courts organised and processed to fruition while Members of Parliament were -as they still do- promoting the waffle that amounts to nothing short of:-

'independence of the judiciary to act in contempt of ALL LAW (national and international) in a pseudo-democracy.

*Link from here to proof of the parts the police play in promotion and expansion of the criminal activities instigated, processed and imposed on society by the legal circles. Read of assertions by a typical hypocrite, none other than the Commissioner of the Metropolitan Police, Sir Robert Mark QPM, when he spoke of FALSE RECORDS / FORGERIES by the legal circles while delivering his famous Dimbleby Lecture on BBC-TV in November 1973, 15 months after he received true copy of THE FORGERY advanced and promoted by the licensed criminals : solicitors and barristers for their evil ends in the case that opened Andrew Yiannides' mental eyes to the realities of life in the United Kingdom, a typical PSEUDOdemocracy. Can anyone enlighten Andrew and the millions of victims of the legal circles WHY NO PROSECUTION of the solicitors & the barristers in 1972 or thereafter?.

  • With such a facility in place (the words we point to above) and arrogant abuse of public office, can anyone assert, or argue, that Mr Andrew Yiannides, the founder of human-rights, was not right to determine that Justice has been abducted and that she is held captive in the dungeons maintained by her abductors who rape her daily in their courts? (>Hence the c reation of www.jusaticeraped.org <)
  • ALL Member States of the European Union are subject to the ruling which visitors, readers and researchers can access in the explicit page /yourrights.htm

*Link from here to the realities - in due course also a link to the warning (indirect but nonetheless very clear) for thinkers to recognise 

  • On 3rd March 2008 >someone's birthday< we released a House of Lords PRECEDENT CASE and reveal deliberations by their Lordships in respect of FRAUD - DECEPTION - CONSPIRACY & IMPLIED LIES BY KEEPING SILENT about any wrong imposed on any other.
  • >>> IN THE MEANTIME we have been naming and shaming a number who know of and engage in much more than just approve wrongs imposed on Mr & Mrs Average, the millions of taxpayers, in our allegedly civilised country / state / province / district of the European Union created by politicians, without reference to the taxed for fraud sucker-serfs, allegedly for the benefit of the citizens from FRAUD & CORRUPTION, among other promotions.

Needless to say the case entailed activities and practices by solicitors as Mr Andrew Yiannides was subjected to, decades later, by an old school friend, Mr Kypros Nichola of Nicholas & Co. in London. Mr K. Nichola bluntly abused the trust placed in him and indulged, in tandem with others, in criminal activities intended to cause the damages that were imposed on the targeted 'serf' by accredited - by the Law Society & Bar Council - allegedly Honourable Officers of the Supreme Court, the courts maintained by successive elected governments in the United Kingdom, one of many pseudodemocracies. In due course another revelation relevant to the arrogant 'inherent jurisdiction', through which to deny, obstruct justice & impose all manner of criminally created states on 'the serfs', who are taxed for the cost of maintaining criminals in public office, in pseudo-democracies.

RESPONSIBLE FOR THE STATE OF AFFAIRS, successive irresponsible Lord Chancellors and Home Secretaries who ignored and ignore all complaints and submissions by victims of the organised crimes we point to and expose in our pages, irrespective of the evidence and the law pointed to, by the victims of it all, the citizens who are called upon to pay taxes for the maintenance of criminals in public office.

[*Link from here to our exclusive page, covering confidential fraud as arranged THROUGH THE BEST KEPT OPEN SECRET in alleged democracies, European States. Elsewhere the foundations and corner stone upon which the operatives built the societies of their making using the bricks and mortar we cover in this and other pages. The visitor should not be under any illusion that the stars in the theatrical productions, covered in our pages were by any stretch of the imagination 'humans' who were / are gifted with any attributes that distinguish 'true humans' (>thinkers<) from animals.

Fraud in court  Council staff use Forgeries   Misconduct in Public Office. 2 cases relative to applicable law One Protocol says it ALL It betrays arrogant intentions Law Provides for THEFTS and it covers Judges too Judges' duties   TIME 4 CHANGE   & CHALLENGES Site CONTENTS - Table of Contents & ongoing work Your Rights & OBLIGATIONS to Society SITE SEARCH facility for any specific element / issue of concern to visitors / readers
COURTS : their Facilities Abused For ORGANISED CRIME : FRAUD Solicitor's Perjury & Victim Ignores it all Just like the Law Society always does Blackmailed or is it Just Conditioned & Subjugated Victims who join the club ? We name Lovers of blunt fraud through courts - Users of the facilities 4 illicit gains Local Authorities & FRAUD on 'serfs' the Taxpayers who are kept in the dark Police Party to & Endorsing Criminal Acts, Activities Arrogant Fraud FALSE Records & Contempt of Law by the legal Circles & Public Services The crafty ones & Vexatious Litigant PLOYS for the rewarded silent

* Information FOR victims who wish to co-operate by EXPOSING & CHALLENGING abusers of Public Office *

family.uk-human-rights justiceraped.org dssfraud.htm confraud.htm dadscare.htm contract.htm converts.htm MensAid
solicitorsfromhell.co.uk chancellor.htm theyknow.htm solfraud.htm sheknows.htm 4deceit.htm convicti.htm forward.htm

December 2006 - SUMMONS ISSUED & SERVED IN RESPECT OF FRAUDULENT & RECKLESSLY IRRESPONSIBLE ACTIVITIES & IMPOSITIONS THROUGH THE FAMILY COURTS

*Link from here to evidence. *Link also from here to a case when the abusers of the courts' facilities abandoned their plans for another targeted family

IMPORTANT INFORMATION for all victims of malpractice - misconduct - negligence, etc. TO NOTE

In the civil justice system in England and Wales, a judge presides over the proceedings that are argued by the opposing sides through the adversarial process. The process enables the court, judge, to reach a conclusion as to the truth of the facts in dispute. Thereat it is for the judge to apply the law to the facts proven, established at court.

The system as evolved is covered in the page 'English Legal System' and remains the same after the Woolf reforms.

An explicit Affidavit [*L] plus exhibits and
     letters to a Chief Inspector of Police
[*L],
          one to solicitors
[*L] and another to the Lord Chancellor [*L] evince
               ORGANISED CRIMES
(Access and read the letter to the police in September 2006 [*L])

Access & read from one of a number of letters to the Prime Minister : * I believe that New Labour will deliver us from the wrongs we have been suffering for far too long. Use of our resources in terms of human potential and capabilities can and should be channelled through rights not wrongs, through positives not through negatives. It is our produce and ingenuity we can sell to others not the minefields of corrupt and bankrupt public services. * [*Link from here to the page, note the steps taken to ensure the Prime Minister forwarded / delegated submissions and evidence received at 10 Downing Street to the right Minister / Ministry because the submissions were in respect of ORGANISED CRIMES

3rd March 2011 added link [*L] to the BBC-TV Dimbleby Lecture in 1973 as the Metropolitan Police Commissioner, Sir Robert Mark prepared & presented to the sucker-serfs

...

To page List of Documented Evidence Released

This page is dedicated to some of the fraudsters who indulged as stooges who abused Mr Yiannides time and his readiness to assist ALL victims of the Institutionally Organised Fraud & Corruption Through Abuse of the Courts facilities. (*Link to List)

targeted.htm             KEY  PageChanges18 May2005

hrbnrsml.gif (1162 bytes)JOIN the Community On Line and work with others for and in the necessary challenges and exposures for the common good. Link to Information Page

Attention is drawn to the words of Jesus Christ, attributed to Him by the editors / creators of The Gospel according to St. Luke. Access His words to the lawyers some 2000 years ago. Many the dignitaries over the two millennia who shared His views (*Link).
Key to Page & Site - List
Lovers of the system as is
Maintenance ENGINEERS
Crocodile TEARS Fraudsters
Trojan Horses Peddlers
Page CHANGES - List
Page IMAGES - List
Page FOOTNOTE - List
Page Letter to CHARLATAN
Page QUOTES - List
OTHER Pages Quotes - List
What For&Who Else Involved
Site Letters TO - List
Site Letters FROM - List
Site IMAGES - List
<> 

Page IMAGES - List
Letter to a charlatan / agent  
Charlatan; he indulged Proof
& Posting Out Of The Blue an Account & Compliments... + Account Credited with funds
<>


The evidence below:

Out of the blue a posting
eafsmiif.jpg (21467 bytes)
Residential address of the targeted Andrew Yiannides, the founder of human-rights, was used by the dreamer who thus exposed himself as a person serving other agendas.

The obverse / back of the envelope evinces posting from the Isle of Man was via Liverpooliomabepf.jpg (18736 bytes)

The compliment slip
aiomcscf.jpg (24498 bytes)
evinces the fact that the Lloyds Bank in Douglas, Isle of Man created an account for a business that required a business registration too. It all indicated that others, such as Public Servants BESIDES THE BANK, were party to the  plans of the charlatan-stooge or agent of the Organisers of the Institutionalised Fraud & Corruption through the courts

The Deposit / Credit Slip
dsiomacf.jpg (25720 bytes)
Constitutes evidence that funds were transferred from another account. The matter was referred to the Inland Revenue. They were asked to look into the matter as a mater of intended fraud. (*Link to letter text received by the charlatan. He shoved it in the dark corners of his perverted / corrupt mind and he never apologised for such activities).  


Letters TO - List
1. April 2003 Frank Field MP
2. Dec. 1999 Prime Minister
3. Dec. 1998 Home Secretary
4. Mar. 2003 Law Society ++
5. August 2003 ECourtHR
6. ILfHRoUN Stamoulakatos N 7.'Open Minds' - Constanti, A

8. <>

Letters FROM - List
1. Part- SOLICITOR To Client 2. Prime Minister Nov. 1999
3. CEO
Haringey Council 2001
4. Haringey Council Dreamer
5. Police Promoting Just LIES 
6. Norman Seeks Information
7. LCD Expose Police LIES
8. An Illiterate LCDpt. Officer
9. ECourtHR September 2003
10. Lord Chancellor's Dpt.
<>

Page NEWS Articles - List
L.E.S by David Blunkett 2004 
Daily Mail Free For All 2001
METRO-Cowboy Lawyers Met Target Lawyers  - 1998
3Million For Invisible refugees
<>

Site NEWS Articles - List
British Justice BLIND, DEAF...
Europe - Public Sector Fraud
House of Lords RULING
Letter to Prime Minister
L.E.S by David Blunkett 
Haringey Investigate Fraud
D. Mail Free For All 2001

D. Express Boys Records
PM. Global Role For Britain
No Need to Raise TAXES

The Times-Plato Not Prozac
<>

Site IMAGES - List
Letter to Prime Minister
PM Sends Subm. to H-Office
H-Office Junior Ignores P.M.
WPC Awarded Half Million
£100,000 Chasing Justice
Letter to Minister May 1997
Two Important Law Reports  <>

Quotes -This  Page
1.Facilities intended to assist the Organisers of fraud and theft of rights ....
2.The judiciary treat citizens as of the citizens are serfs....
3.Public Servants steal from and defraud their masters the citizens who pay meet the cost of their salaries....
4.Judicial chair occupants as tools of the politicians, act in contempt of the law, impose..
<>
Other Pages Quotes
5.The Court Order is but a FORGERY if the most .....
<>


Three images of the letter to Mr. A Constantiaca03p1r.jpg (65171 bytes)
His priorities turned out to have been other than what he promoted when he made contact.

aca03p2r.jpg (112828 bytes)

aca03p3r.jpg (98268 bytes)
Access the text in HTML in the page below

He received also a FAX later and at no time did he ever challenged the truths sated in both. acfrhf4r.jpg (69159 bytes)

THE ABOVE WAS NOT JUST ANOTHER VICTIM-DREAMER. NOR WAS HE THE LAST OF AGENTS / TUTORED IDIOTS WHO CAME ALONG WITH VILE PLANS FOR ANDREW. (*Link to evidence & attempts through which to create false records). by  US. D   +++++

 

 

 

 

TARGETED by AGENTS - Lovers of it All 
undercon.gif (286 bytes) *Page Revised: June 20, 2012
Site under reconstruction - ongoing additions and improvements

Guidelines on Navigating through the extensive material: access instructions.  The first step for visitors to acquaint  themselves with the extensive material should be to use the SEARCH FOR facility. Just type in and word or combination of words / issues that are of concern / interest - need information and our views about. Remember that our views rest in factual experiences and research with evidence in support. We urge visitors and in particular victims of the legal circles and the Law Enforcement Agencies to access the introduction page to the Community on Line (*Link).

As part of the reconstruction process our new pages and pages where changes and additions have been implemented, the improved / amended pages are endorsed with the link 'Page Changes and the date of the last changes. The link takes visitors to a List of the changes implemented in the page. These include new material and links from relevant paragraphs to other or new relevant material in other pages. For further clarification email: webmaster@

  • The letter below covers the activities of a person who contacted Andrew for other purposes and plans than were promoted by the crafty subliminal indoctrination promoter. Just another arrogant user of the facilities in place; simply a dreamer who targets victims of the legal circles FOR MORE OF THE SAME.

  • And as if such activities were /are not enough, from the onset he set out to create FACILITIES that were intended to assist the ORGANISERS of the usual FRAUDULENT CONSTRUCTIVE THEFTS OF RIGHTS through creative use of false records.

  • Of such activities and facilities (false records) the criminals who are in control in pseudo-democracies did IMPOSE a fraudulent divorce and family break-down on the founder of human-rights.

  • Readers and researchers should *link to an affidavit which the deponent, although a person who benefited from the work and extensive assistance by Mr Andrew Yiannides, she recklessly failed to execute the warranted deposition in excess of three years. The deponent then delayed delivery of the affidavit to the intended victim of the legal circles and public servants who engage in organised crime through abuse of the courts' facilities.

  • And other victims, in the United Kingdom simply working towards the creation and the implementation of the intended alternative legal services, of which plans the Lord Chancellor spoke when he was addressing the Home Affairs Select Committee in November 1999.

  • The evidence pointed-to in this (and other affiliated pages) the visitor, the reader, the genuine researcher should take on board. OF SUCH ACTIVITIES the great CIUKU Enterprises have been flourishing for centuries, if not millennia. [*Link to the words attributed to Jesus Christ by the creators / editors of the New Testament. **Thereafter access the material facts and the realities pointed to in the page where one reads of the connection to the issues spoken of by Jesus Christ and the solicitor who engaged in the destruction of the business of an old school friend. ***Readers need simply note that the solicitor SET ABOUT USING A BLUNT FORGERY WHICH HE ENTERTAINED, as submitted by the solicitors who were acting for the defendants who indulged in ARROGANT FRAUD at the expense of his client].

  • All, naturally, is founded and rests on the plans of the abductors and rapists of Democracy & Justice. In the meantime their agents for ever busy promoting through SUBLIMINAL INDOCTRINATION RANTING the pre-scripted *plans for sons of men* as organised by the creators of the creator of 'creation'. [*Link to an explicit extract from the work of the creators and note what young Andrew considered at a young age].

Page1
jn03p1f.jpg (79572 bytes)
Link to top of page1 - text
Page2
jn03p2f.jpg (89485 bytes)
Link to top of page2 text
Page3
jn03p3f.jpg (95894 bytes)
Link to top of page3   text
Page4
jn03p4f.jpg (84109 bytes)
Link to top of page4   text
The images, above, are of the four pages of the explicit letter that was delivered to the dreamer of a stooge / directed / used / arrogant abuser and illustrious liberty taker.The letter in HTML format is in the window, below. Note please that use of HTML assists in the creation of kinks to and from. (*Link to the text, content of the letter)
The text below is in HTML format for links to and from page images, also to other material

M12 June 2003

ILFHR-UN

Mr Nicholas Stamoulakatos
Shelbourne Road
London - N17 9YH

My Ref: 12AJNNEI
Your Ref: Bulletins / Fears / Inexcusable Misrepresentations

 

Dear Mr. Stamoulakatos & Miss Tambor

Re: ‘Perpetual misrepresentations and attempts to IMPOSE

I enclose my letters of (see-attached list) and the relevant copy-attachments referred thereto. I forward these now that you are 'back to your normal working, environment'. In putting together my concerns and thoughts I bear in mind your suggestions / invitation / proposition that I should take an interest / over the case that caused me to write to you in no uncertain terms. I refer of course to the attempts to implicate me for the umpteenth time in matters that were and remain the creations of fertile imaginings and false account by the authors.

I refer you to my extensive communication of 12 April 2002. I was caused to settle (as briefly as was possible at the time) and to forward copies of that long communication to both of you personally (using the proof of posting facility) and to the ILFHR-UN using the Recorded Delivery facility. THE EVER PRESENT attempts to impose on and for me concocted fabrications about my person, since I was introduced to you, were and remain unacceptable. Mr Stamoulakatos ever since you sought contact, through suspect quarters (*F2), with someone who would be in a position to translate 'your books' from Greek to English, the machinations never ceased. The attempts to impose 'your plans for / on me', have been an endless tirade of wild schemes to which there appears to be no end.

MY LETTER LAST YEAR, to which I refer you, appears to have merited no consideration, by you. I made it very clear that I objected to the attempts to implicate me in a claim for alleged liabilities founded on fictitious work and allegedly, contracted retainers. MY OBJECTIONS TO THE FABRICATIONS WERE VERY CLEAR and your submissions to Edmonton County Court and in particular to DJ Silverman intriguingly clear (*F3). Nonetheless you carry on as if you were and have been addressing an illiterate in law and or a person who is prone to partake in fraudulent claims and or activities. Can you please write back and justify such activities? You should send also a copy of your explanations to your favourite court and judge, as you did last year. The judiciary, are of opinion that the citizens in the United Kingdom are serfs of the Middle Ages and many a promoter of such mentalities still dwell in that era, Mr Stamoulakatos. Such Public(!) Servants(?) who defraud their Masters of their properties (including their rights in law) are being exposed on the Internet for and because of the criminal indulgences the SERVANTS OF THE CITIZENS appear to relish in unchecked, unsupervised and uncontrolled by a non-elected Minister who is in charge of the 'free to act, as they please (and or as used by the state and politicians) judicial chair occupants, through contempt of all law; acting as dictators and the tools of politicians via the much revered 'independence of the judiciary' promotions, when in fact it is clear that the promoters know that they mean 'independent of the restraints of law' - licensed criminals', in a pseudo-democracy. You should refer to THE APPEAL that is published by *human-rights* on the Internet, covering aspects of how the manna providers steal with the help of such criminals from the citizens who pay taxes for the cost of retaining criminals as their servants at and in law. The copies of the letters that I enclose, to:

  1. The Chief Executive and to
  2. The Social Services Department at Haringey Council, with
  3. The other attached copies of communications

ARE NOT NEWSPAPER CUTTINGS but intellectual property covering facts, realities and the law applicable to factual scenarios from within the Borough of Haringey.

I refer you to your recent communications ALL FOUNDED AND RESTING ON YOUR FEARS, about
(End of Page 1 text - Link to image) - (Below start of Page 2)

what MIGHT BE DONE to you during medical examinations and tests at the North Middlesex Hospital. In one of your communications, you WRONGLY ASSERTED that I had been at the same hospital and that I had stayed in after the tests for three days. YOU, Mr. Stamoulakatos, had been told very clearly that I had to undergo similar tests at St. Bartholomew's Hospital in central London. I clarified that I had gone to the hospital (for the investigative tests) one late afternoon and stayed overnight. I qualified that the tests were carried out the following day and that I was awake, throughout, watching everything on a VDU (TV screen) because local anaesthetic was used. I further clarified that I stayed in hospital for that night as well (just over one day by then) and that I was released/allowed to go home, the following morning. THE SCENARIO that you elected to create and to misrepresent to the North Middlesex Hospital authorities / officials was just another figment of the type of theatrics and UNTRUTHS THAT EMANATE FROM YOUR QUARTERS RELENTLESSLY. Where on earth, and HOW did the North Middlesex Hospital feature in the events that I spoke of, to you, in respect of similar tests, to/for me at the BARTS, as the hospital is known for short?

I am obligated to address the melodramas and the fears you relentlessly promoted in your recent communications to the North Middlesex Hospital and to many others. I ELECTED NOT TO address the issues there and then, as I was perfectly entitled to do in view of the untruths that you promoted about my person, for the umpteenth time. I did so BECAUSE I DID NOT WISH TO ADD TO YOUR DISTRESS AND WORRIES / CONCERNS about the 'possibilities' you were alluding to.

HOWEVER, you must compare my considerate approach with your attitude towards the circumstances that you witnessed and got to KNOW OF in late 1996 and early 1997:

  1. With a contract on my life,
  2. With my mother's heart condition and her health in a deteriorating state and in hospital.
  3. WITH A BEREAVED SISTER, whose daughter was caused to take her own life, because of her father's mentality and his lack of consideration FOR HER NEEDS.
  4. With that very same 'male chauvinist Scrooge of a penny pinching animal' seeking to have my sister certified as mentally disturbed / unbalanced.
  5. And the very same Scrooge of a man behind the 'whatever it takes, get rid of him' ( Όσα, Όσα ) contract on my life. (Aiding advising and abetting him in all of these YVA : see AoAO)

ALL YOU COULD MANAGE / ARRANGE / COME UP WITH (as a Human Rights Activist and challenger of the evil mongering, that you speak of in private ONLY, including court appearances under the same guise) was for you TO MAKE FUN OF ME AND TO IGNORE IT ALL. (Human Rights?)

To the above lack of interest and or concerns by/from you and the organisation that you lead', I must add the fact that you were MOCKING ME, just like the police about THE VERY REAL CONTRACT ON MY LIFE. It was not a case of imaginary lethal injections or possible arranged accidents, as you were promoting recently about your person and YOUR FEARS, but a very real contract on my life, with a witness to it all, in existence. WITH THE POLICE LAUGHING AT AND MOCKING ME INSTEAD OF INVESTIGATING THE COMMISSION FOR A MURDER! ALL you contributed at the time was to make fun of me! And you did so, simply because of my fears and sentiments about the tragic loss of a life, that of my niece, and my concerns for my sister and what the penny-pinching chauvinist was planning for my sister.

Out of necessity, I have to remind you that it was WHEN I BECAME AWARE that the Scrooge of a man who had been boasting that he could buy any service (the police in his palm, etc.) was benefiting from 'Lack of any issued or served Summons'. Such assertions by the Magistrates Clerk, EVEN THOUGH A HEARING DATE HAD BEEN FIXED by the Criminals in Control of Haringey / Highgate Magistrates Courts! That my niece was caused to take her own life (by the generous buyer of services from and by criminals' was not enough for 'cold blooded and cool thinking you', naturally! All was noted, however.

TO CAP IT ALL UP, when a new hearing had been arranged, Wendy turned up late, WELL AFTER THE CONCLUSION OF THE ADJOURNED HEARING, with an excuse that you were held up in another case/hearing/court. So much for your interest in the serious issues you had witnessed!

  • No Summons ISSUED ?
  • No Summons SERVED ?
  • And the court HAD invited the victims, to their theatres !

You must have recognised that it was a case of 'further indulgence and to have fun at and with the victims. Just like you mocking me because of my fears for my life and what the male chauvinist man my sister married might proceed to do to her, had his contract on my life materialised. (Human Rights?)
(End of Page 2 text - Link to image) - (Below start of Page 3)

I never asked for any proof of 'the other hearing' because by then I had enough about your plans for me, especially with the never ending attempts to implicate me in other plans than the work for translation of non existent books which you had/have been talking of as work that has been ready for PUBLICATION (at least in Greek) ever since you sought contact with a person to translate(?) the works(!).

YOU caused me to get in touch with the Inland Revenue not long after I was introduced to you, Mr Stamoulakatos. I did so because of an indulgence you embarked upon WITHOUT ANY REFERENCE TO ME, even though it entailed use of my residential address. YOUR PLANS FOR THE TRANSLATOR TO BE TAKEN IN (and for a song / ride) FAILED. You should have recognised then and have known of it, ever since, that I am no fool or some 'mug' who can be made to fall in any trap because of 'financial gains' through fraudulent schemes and promotions, such as you have relentlessly been 'giving birth to via imaginary scenarios'.

  1. I never contacted you for the publication of any of your non-existent works / books.
  2. I simply contacted you for 'your asserted needs' for someone to translate from Greek to English, such books as I WOULD ENDORSE AND APPROVE OF, as I qualified at the time and in letters ever since.
  3. NO BOOKS - were ever referred to or handed over to me, to read, approve of and endorse 'for translation' with any possible input from me, SHOULD I HAVE AGREED to enter into such an agreement with you, as co-author'.

YOU KNOW WHY I ASKED FOR THE CONSTITUTION / Articles of Association of the ILFHR-UN. You know that it turned out that it was a joke of a laughable translation from Greek to English, as I read through it. You should or MUST HAVE RECOGNISED that I WAS NO SIMPLETON who would ever be likely to ENTERTAIN SUCH RIDICULOUS PLANS, AS YOU CONCOCTED FOR AND ATTEMPTED TO IMPLICATE ME IN. The simple fact that an alleged Human Rights Organisation IMPOSES, through its Constitution / Articles of Association, A DICTATORIAL REGIME, is an insult to humanity. IMPOSING on the naïve, the gullible AND THE VULNERABLE, who join such a set up and sign away THEIR 'RIGHT TO DISSENT', was and remains the most vile of insults to any intelligent person who knows of and values his rights from within any Democratic State. Your Socialist / Communist Ideals, and background, may have been of influence on you, when you first set about drafting such a constitution / Articles of Association. That factor alone was the only reason why I looked upon that vile and CONTEMPTUOUS OF HUMAN RIGHTS LAW and breaches / violation AS SHEER STUPIDITY. Yes, stupidity and I choose to I allow myself the same freedoms and liberties as you have been doing for years. ANYONE who approved the ILFHR-UN Articles of Association and Constitution AND ANYONE WHO ENDORSES SUCH PROCLIVITY has no rights to refer to himself or themselves as Human Rights activists and or promoters.

Your activities behind the scenes, as of the onset, disclosed and exposed much. Only a dreamer could have come up with the invitation and the contract that you concocted in the first instance, without any proofs of any works or books, in Greek, from and by you. Proof of such works, was and remained for years YOUR FIRST PRIORITY, if you genuinely sought contact with me for such translation. Producing, to me, such work was ALSO WARRANTED UNDER MY PRE-CONDITIONS to any agreement with you IF I WAS TO UNDERTAKE and contract for such work with you.

You even ATTEMPTED to 'engage me' in your plans TO IMPOSE ON ME, a contract which I rejected outright. YOU KNOW PERFECTLY WELL that I did so, because it was a case of YOU seeking to IMPOSE ON ME the role of a publisher and distributor, in contempt of the offer that I had agreed to call upon you and to discuss with you; simply TRANSLATION….. TRANSLATION…. TRANSLATION.

Following receipt of my letter of 12 April 2002 (to which I refer you) you wrote a letter to DJ Silverman at your favourite, local court about my person and the implications were obvious. I may have chosen to ignore the obvious, because of the questionable manner and the false assertions that were being put forward about my person in respect of the alleged claims for damages and alleged translation work. I suggest that you consider carefully the letters which I had no choice but to write to Mr Andy Constanti (dated 10th and 20th April 2003) and to the letter that I wrote to and for you in Greek. Both of my letters to Mr A. Constanti are very clear in what they are intended to convey to that charlatan and abuser of my time. I suggest that you consider very carefully ALL OF THE ISSUES RAISED through the letter in Greek to you Mr Stamoulakatos. Do not fail to note that I WAS ABLE TO WORK OUT where he came from and WHAT HIS PLANS (with those who directed him to me) WERE. (Human Rights?)

You should consider ALL OF THE CRIMINAL ACTIVITIES POINTED TO:
(End of Page 3 text - Link to image) - (Below start of Page 4)

  1. Through the two letters to Mr A Constanti, you should recognise that he simply 'set about to obstruct justice' and my rights and duties under the law! Such vile acts on top of all the abuse of my time and all of the other liberties he indulged in, while benefiting from much by way of guidance and assistance in the many problems he 'was facing' and had been referring to me. I need not remind you that he was NOT THE ONLY GREEK who sought to promote / sell a Trojan Horse to a person of Greek background. There was the introduction for and by the Loonies (that is how the legal professions refer to the Litigants) In Person Society, plans for victims of THE TRIAD: Legal / Judicial / Police (the unholy              TRIAD).
  2. By considering very carefully the clearly stated facts to the Chief Executive Officer at Haringey Council, in my letter of 1st November 1999. Gurbux Singh Esq. was responsible for 'THE BLUNTLY ORGANISED DISORGANISATION' and the fraudulent conversions of Housing Benefit funds. Nothing but sheer constructive frauds through pre-arranged 'CREATIVE ACCOUNTANCY SCAMS'. You MUST consider the fact that I exposed and I am exposing it all on the Internet. I caused the issues to be brought out into the open (local press) AFTER I WROTE TO THE HOME SECRETARY in December 1998.
  3. BY ARRANGING to visit an Internet café, where you SHOULD ACCESS the letter to the Home Secretary (in 1998) AND POSSIBLY RECOGNISE the big difference between the 21st century and the Middle Ages where you are still roaming and meandering.
  4. BY CONSIDERING the submissions to the criminals at Haringey Council who sunk their heads in the sand, like ostriches, after receiving the letter dated 8th June 2001. I SETTLED the legal arguments 'for the intended victims' and Mr. P. Nicolaou signed and ensured it was delivered to the dreamers / criminals. READ IT and CONSIDER THAT IT WAS INTENDED TO BE A LESSON IN LAW and that it was put on the table of the CRIMINALS IN CONTROL OF THE SOCIAL SERVICES and the LEGAL DEPARTMENT, at Haringey Council. Then consider my suggestions to you in the letter in Greek about 'the asylum creators and their partners in crime. I refer, of course, to those who welcome 'the created' asylum' seekers and THEN provide manna through thefts of the properties and the rights in law of targeted citizens, from within an alleged democratic state that allegedly rests and is founded on principles of law and order. (Human Rights?)

I hereby invite you to justify the alleged 'retained for and to remain as translator' in your letter to DJ Silverman. I am exposing the aforesaid judicial chair occupant, on the Internet. The stated facts, through the published appeal IN THE ONLY TRUE AND OPEN COURT IN THE WORLD are very clear. The legal arguments are founded and rest solidly on the stated facts, on the breached and violated rights in law, but most of all on documented evidence that many shoved in the dark corners of their perverted minds. (Human Rights?)

I hereby invite you to justify the implied assertion that the atrocious English used in the 'work' publication / yearbook / promotional work for the ILFHR-UN - come 'The Abduction of Abdullah Ocalan' was / is remotely connected to any alleged translation work by me.

I pointed you to the realities and the facts AS THESE ARE DEVELOPING NOW. I gave to you a copy of my letter to the Rt. Hon. Frank Field MP - ex Minister and you should consider attending / going to an Internet café for access to ALL OF THE MATERIAL POINTED TO the MP through the text of the letter. Then, I expect of any genuine challenger and exponent of the law on human rights to cease all ostrich acts and to act for and in the interest of the 'serfs'.

I conclude by pointing you to the words of Heraklitos which the creators/editors of the Gospel according to St. John set off with. The Greek, gentleman who was introduced by the Loonies In Person Society, when asked if he had any books in his collection about the work of Heraklitos, came up with a beauty of a 'mbourda', "I was never interested and have no interest in sculptors and sculpture". I would have expected such an answer from the charlatan A. Constanti who grew up in the United Kingdom, but not from somebody, who was born, grew up and was educated in Greece to, at least, College level.

Sincerely

Andrew Yiannides
ENCL. As text and attached list.

Back to letter images

...

The right to reply and to justify behaviour and activities covered in our pages, is assured to any one named. We will publish excuses & whatever submitted to us with any legal argument arising thereof.

This page is dedicated to all abusers of our time and in particular to evil-mongering fraudsters, such as Mr. Johan Michael Richard Foenander and his soul mates from within the LIPS crowd-mob. Also, to all other charlatans who allegedly care or are concerned about 'the serfs', they draw in their nets.... simply FOR MORE OF THE SAME. Agents of the UKMM, in 1998, wrote to Andrew, the founder of the Non Governmental Organisation *human-rights*, while of opinion that they were addressing an idiot, as others direct / cause them to believe. Their unsolicited invitation to Andrew, caused him to contact the leaders of the UKMM. They were asked to furnish specific information. They received letters to that effect later but typically, they failed to comply, like all other charlatans and ostriches, when confronted with legitimate demands or pointed to the realities. With such persons, allegedly leading / serving the victims of Institutionalised Fraud & Corruption, as a solicitor wrote of to a client who needs enemies? 

And in 2001 along came 2 other lovers of the system as is, Mr Patrick Culinnane of the IBRG & Ms Marisa Sarda, a 'crafty genius and product of the LIPS crowd/mob. With foul intentions the two set about to create FALSE RECORDS ABOUT & in respect of the work of Mr Andrew Yiannides; false promotions of their own making for use by abusers of public office, who, as transpired later, had indulged in much more than fraudulent demands from a targeted 'serf' who dared challenge the criminal activities of the protected and persons who could / can afford to secure the invisible services of the criminals who were / are in control of the legal system and the court services, part of Crimes Incorporated United Kingdom Unlimited (CIUKU) Enterprises.
Page1
pcmlm41r.jpg (120738 bytes)

Page2
pcmlm42r.jpg (119957 bytes)
Page3
pcmlm43r.jpg (57585 bytes)

Carbon Copy (cc) to Patrick stipulates the last entry.
  • The three pages, on the left are of a FAX / letter which Ms Marisa Sarda sent to Mr.Patrick Cullinane, a victim of the Inland Revenue.
  • Most interesting the fact that the authoress of an intended FALSE INSTRUMENT (created by agents / or tutored stooges who operate as lovers of the system as is) failed to send/deliver the same instrument to the person it was being addressed to.
  • Anyone who knows of the whereabouts of the authoress should contact her and ask her one SIMPLE QUESTION: "Why did she fail to fax her response to the person she allegedly was responding to?"
  • At the same time the maligned & crafty (both) should also state THEIR PERSONAL REASONS as to why they set about to create the false records they wilfully intended to suppress from the target of their fraudulent activities.

pcclbrr.jpg (33780 bytes)
Reference to the date of the above letter assists in recognising why the allegedly destroyed FAX  was resurrected in 2004 by Mr. P. Cullinane.

The date and time when transmission of the four images (3 above and one on the left) can be seen at the top of all pages. Mr Patrick Cullinane, received copy of the above 'response by Ms Marisa Sarda to Mr Yiannides within 48 hours of Mr Yiannides communicating, to her, his concerns relative to matters SHE INSTIGATED. She INSTRUCTED Mr. Patrick Cullinane to ask Mr. Yiannides 'how much he charges persons he assists in and with their cases at court'. Other priorities had been attended to (presence at Sheffield Crown Court for the last week of Mr. Norman Scarth's trial) Mr. Yiannides raised issue with her by repeating what Mr Patrick Cullinane had been instructed to seek information about. What she received had been read and approved as truly representative of the scenario from concept to the day the letter was written and transmitted to her. Upon receipt of the purported copy to Mr. P Cullinane, he visited Mr Yiannides 'to express his anger at being implicated in the very matters he HAD ACCEPTED instructions from her to deal with. His failure to permit Mr Yiannides to read and make a copy of that which angered him was most revealing. Denying to the 'intended' (as recorded) recipient copy of and access to the content was most offensive, especially when Mr P. Cullinane carried on denying to Mr. Yiannides a copy and access to the content because, he asserted, it was his property. Anyone who is in contact with Mr. Cullinane can simply ask "WHY the obstructions"? Access to the content of the letter FAX, by the intended recipient.could not be denied, for it was ongoing in contempt of the provisions of various Data Protection Acts. Essential PROTECTION FROM FALSE RECORDS (such were and remain the allegations recorded in the letter) IS PARAMOUNT IN RESPECT OF ANYTHING CREATED & MAINTAINED ABOUT THE CITIZENS of the United Kingdom.
07. 03 . 04 SUN 16:46 FAX 0208 428 8644 IBRG (CJC) f~001

FAX TO ANDREW YIANNIDES
FROM Marisa Sarda
Date 1O.May.2OOl

 

Dear Andrew:

I would like to clarify a few points, concerning the fax you have send me the other day. I should not have to be doing this but there is a 3rd party involved & for Patrick’s sake I am taking my valuable time to do this.

I do not know what you want me to apologise for, I shall put the record straight:
1) I have met you at the meeting with Lips, a meeting that nobody has seen anything like it by lack of professionalism.
2) On that day, you came to my house with Terry Ewing, you wanted to know about my case & I gave you a leaflet where my case is explained on a nut shell for everybody to understand, not just for victims. The leaflet has the objective to tell Mr & Mrs average what can happen to them.
3) Some time still in 1998 you contacted me several times asking me for my case. I have said that you have already got it. You said to me that you wanted to put my case on the Internet together with other cases similar. I have said what you have was enough because I firmly believe that the more that you put the less that people read it.
You went on to say & you have said several times that you wanted to have a website & that it cost money that everybody should chip in, I think that you have said EVERYBODY COULD PUT £ 80. You can cruc1fze me if you want, but that is the true. If at later date you have more victims & you thought you could bring down the cost. I do not remember you saying that, because if you remember every time you call, you talk & talk & talk & it is me who has to say " please say what you call for".
4. Up to the 3rd of May I did not know how other pressure groups organise themselves, but I am always very sceptical of people who need money to do things, because it puts them in a position of vulnerability that if they need money sooner or later the group is going to be infiltrated & rubbished by the opposition. I particularly have extremely powerful & rich enemies to whom money is not an object & to devalue my case by putting other cases not so serious in the same " wash it DEVALUES THE SERIOUSNESS & suffering that we are going through. This I thought before. I this I still think.

It is never my intention to upset anyone. It has been you who has been calling me & after I had my EDP1 ( which people of weight said I HAVE CHANNELLED MY CASE IN THE RIGHT PATHS ) you have tried to persuade me again this year to join another group of several victims like myself. To this I have said that if we were to organise something, I SHALL DO IT ON MY TERMS. You then called me "HITLER this is very hard to understand, that I want what you want. We both want to organise something & WE BOTH WANT TO HAVE CONTROL OF OUR CASES.

On the day when we spoke ion the phone when you were at Norman’s I have told you that I was at the H o C on the 4th I wanted people who have cases of serious grievances. I was in London, I have made several calls, I only managed to leave a message on Ebert’s machine & David Brown I have met personally & he said he was going to go with some evidence I could not get hold of Patrick, I have left a message with Richard O’Mahoney that if Patrick was engaged Richard could take to the H o C the cases published in the Guardian. 

On the 4th I was on my own. It did not matter because I had some cases on file from newspaper cuts similar to mine. I took that with me.

You were upset that I have not been in touch telling you the time of the meeting. One should think that if you really wanted to go, you could call the House, ask for Andy King’s secretary & ask at what time we were meeting.

If you remember, on the 8th of Dec 1999 we went to No 10 to serve Petitions. We went from all over the country, you did not bother to turn up. There was some people who commented (I am not going to tell you who) that since you were in London you could have made the effort.

THIS ARE THE FACTS, I WISH YOU HAVE CHOSEN A BETTER TIME TO TAKE MY TIME.

What we all have to do, is to establish what is a Campaign & what is a pressure group. A campaign could go on & on like Liberty for 10 years. A pressure group (like Fairshares) does not just say what is wrong, THEY ALSO TELL THE GOVERNMENT HOW T0 PUT IT RIGHT. We were organised, we wrote letters at the same time to have more impact, we lobby the H o C & the H o L & the law for splitting the pensions in divorce came about our efforts.

I remember it well, when I wrote to Andrew Dinsmore with the names of the judges who acted wrongly on my case. I spread news around that Dinsmore was collecting information. Nothing happened, his secretary told me that it was only 3 THREE OF US WHO WROTE. This is why they did not take it seriously. I checked with Norman & Geoffrey, they said they wrote, but if you remember you did not want to put the names of the judges who had done you wrong. You refuse to follow anybody’s ideas, but you expect everybody to say how high when you say jump".

1Solidarity must come from all sides, not just from others to you. If you think that what you are doing is best, good luck to you, but anybody who is a real victim, encourages others to try different angles & hope that one of these days somebody, ANYBODY SHALL OPEN THE FLOODGATES FOR OTHERS.

I do not expect to change you, you can not expect to change me. What I have said it is the true & if you still want to blackmail me that you are going to go on into a character assassination, well, that is your choice. Do not be surprised if at this time you devalue my efforts, you are also devaluing yourself.

If you were so eager to know the whole of my case, it is very simple NO DISCLOSURE. You can ask Roger Jones, Sheela Wootton, Eva Adshed, Patrick or others who have bothered to turn up that I had said to Justice Jacob 'SOME DISCLOSURE', I had said 'SOME' 6 tines in 1 hearing.

If you look at the internet, the LIPS in America are organised & they passed a law that FRAUDULENT BILLING ON THE PART OF THE LAWYERS IS FRAUD UNDER THE CONSUMER ACT. They put cases in a nut shell of some 200 words THAT PEOPLE READ. You must think back when we had a normal lift that we did not have the time to go through people’s problems if they needed 20 or 30 pages to say what is wrong.

As to anybody who is a real victim, I wish you well with your campaign & I trust you will get there.

Marisa

cc Patrick

Yet another crafty one, who had come along a couple of years earlier. He had other ideas, plans and schemes for Mr Yiannides and his work. He proved to have been just another dreamer who failed to consider the simple fact that by failing to use his rights (as a victim (?)), while promoting opinions and assertions about the media editors and barons, he was simply exposing his true colours through his convenient defaults and failures. Just another convert-to & lover of the system as is. He set about inviting & contemplating to suck Mr Andrew Yiannides into the world of the fraudsters-club-recruits.

Links from the text below to the images of the actual communications

10 April 2003

Mr Andy Constanti
Open Minds (Foundation?)
35 Helston Court
Tottenham
London - N15 5HF

My Ref. 10ACACDO

Your Ref. Convenient Defaults & Omissions

 

OPEN LETTER

Cc To Whom It May Concern

RECORDED DELIVERY plus 2nd posting using Proof of Posting Service

REMEMBER : 'Εν Αρχή Ην Ο Λόγος' – Ηράκλητος : 'One Begins With LOGIC' - Heraclitus

 

Dear Mr Constanti

Re: Your Convenient Defaults & Omissions attached to YOUR(?) personal agendas

I refer you to my communication of February 20th 2003. You initially asserted and alleged that it was not delivered by the postal services. You subsequently received the succinctly stated matters by fax. Your convenient defaults and omissions had been and were being noted, over a long period of time. Your elusive tactics, especially following the local Scrutiny Panel public meeting last September (2002) were and have been most intriguing.

I refer you to your call last Saturday, in order ‘to enlighten(?) me(!) and to show to me the article in the day’s Daily Mirror, about the use of mobile phones. The latest ‘pronouncements’, apparently, following research and studies on EMF radiation! The following should put things in perspective and cause any reasonable person to surmise accordingly, as to the realities you and others wish to shove under the carpets and or the family closets of the maligned and evil of the society we live in:

  1. I DO NOT NEED TO REMIND YOU that when you first sought introduction to me, and to my work, YOU WERE USING A MOBILE PHONE!
  2. DO I NEED TO REMIND YOU of the simple fact that, at the same time, IT WAS YOUR INTENTION to raise issue over alleged EMF radiation bombardments directed at your mother and you, allegedly, through the ceiling from the flat above your mother’s and your residence?
  3. DO I NEED TO REMIND you of the attempt, the night when you telephoned for me to call round in order to confirm, for myself, the noises ‘from the equipment in the flat above’ used for the creation of the alleged direct bombardment of EMF radiation?
  4. AND, WHAT OF the fact THAT AS I WAS MAKING MY WAY TO YOUR DOOR the neighbour who, allegedly, was responsible for the asserted bombardments, approached me (at that late hour) in order to point me to the empty / vacant flat adjoining your residence, in order to enlighten(!) me(?) by asserting that the noises (EMF Radiation bombardment equipment(?)) were emanating from THAT FLAT?
  5. DO I NEED TO REMIND YOU that I SIMPLY POINTED OUT TO THAT VOLUNTEER, (who just ‘conveniently happened to be there’ at the right time(!)) that the noise she was referring to was coming from a faulty / inoperative fluorescent light housing on the wall across the passage?
  6. DO I NEED TO REMIND YOU that I had to point you to the simple fact that ‘big shot YOU, was using the latest gadget? I refer of course to YOUR MOBILE TELEPHONE!
  7. DO I NEED TO REMIND YOU that I had to point out to you, on three occasions, that my sister, my mother and I were being bombarded with EMF radiation because of thousand-fold of transmissions FROM AND BY MOBILE PHONE MASTS? I referred of course to the proliferation of such masts, ALL OVER THE PLACE, because of YOUR CHOICE and use of the technology!
  8. DO I NEED TO REMIND YOU of the fact that, even though we were no admirers of OR USERS, LIKE YOU, of the latest technology and gadgets, you carried on ignoring my concerns? It was a simple case of ‘reckless use of the technology, by a person who was complaining about its use in direct bombardments! It was a case OF CONSCIOUS and voluntary APPLICATION of the very technology, straight into the ear drum and the skull of an alleged victim who ‘just conveniently ignored my observations’ as of no relevance to such a person, as YOU!
  9. DO I NEED TO REMIND YOU of the simple fact that my sister HAD TO point out to you that you had ignored my requests TO CEASE USING A MOBILE PHONE, while raising complaints about EMF radiation? It never occurred to you or you failed to realise that you were not dealing with some ‘naïve’, gullible moron! However, AFTER my sister pointed out to you the simple reality, YOU CEASED USING a mobile phone, at least, in our presence!

I do not propose to delve on any other of the numerous reasons and causes for concern as regards your perpetual duplicity of purpose and scenarios. Such matters I leave for some later date. Right now I AM MOST INTRIGUED by your persistent failures to act honourably and in a manner befitting your alleged concerns about rampant fraud within the financial sectors and the legal system. YOU WERE AFFORDED PLENTY OF OPPORTUNITIES to read of the results of the research and my work going back to well over three decades. You were afforded the opportunities to SEE SOME OF THE EVIDENCE that substantiates and qualifies that, what I state happens to be the truth.

Following on from the above realities, I remind you that while evidence exists, facilities have been put in place to support any allegations, from and by any GENUINE VICTIMS! ONLY A FOOL OR OTHERWISE MOTIVATED CHARLATAN carries on waffling and pretending WHILE RUBBING SHOULDERS with those he or she complains of. You were, in fact, pointed to a number of such ‘wily and crafty’ (tutored by others in the background) persons. LIKE SOME OF THE CHARLATANS & STOOGES, who crossed my path, over the years, you too, were made aware of the facilities that exist FOR PURE, UNADULTERATED JUSTICE & DEMOCRACY. You were given more than enough information and plenty of opportunities to either act as each occasion commanded, or to come clean. You failed, abysmally, to stand behind your words as an alleged victim / challenger.

I did not and I do not care to know as to who directed you to seek contact with me and or to search for ‘The CAMILA Project’ on the Internet. The simple fact is that the person who introduced you to me KNEW that what was being published on the Internet, by me, was under the Non Governmental Organisation banner Human-Rights.Org and NOT ‘under ‘The CAMILA Project’. Interesting that another who sought contact with me always refers to me and to my work as ‘The CAMILA Project’. Most intriguing that others who were directed to contact me and or to invite me to ‘join their movement’, they addressed their invitations to me as to ‘The CAMILA Project’!

Born of the above realities, THE FIRST CONCLUSION & COMMON FACTOR, Mr Constanti. The SECOND REALISATION IS MORE IMPORTANT, though. It happens to be the very simple factor of seeking to work, with, and from within the system. The crafty and wily NOT WISHING TO CHALLENGE OR EXPOSE OPENLY, provided of course that they are in possession of genuine case-history / evidence / material. We then come to the conclusion that such persons also prefer to work within the existing framework (as with others that I spoke of to you FROM THE ONSET and I produced evidence). The mentalities of such persons MOST PRONOUNCED THROUGH & BECAUSE OF THEIR ‘VERY CONVENIENT’ DEFAULTS & OMISSIONS. Such persons CONSCIOUSLY INDULGING THEMSELVES in contempt of the fact that they are pointed to such realisations. What we have are alleged victims, who simply exhibit signs of sheer Sadists and Masochists. SADISTS because, apparently, they love to know of the fact that thousands of victims, out there, are being defrauded or tormented by the abusers of public office. MASOCHISTS, naturally, because they themselves love being tormented by the very abusers they do not wish to challenge or expose openly! Heaven forbid, why should they act in any manner that is likely to lead to changes and deprivation of their right to relish in their masochistic pleasures?

With the above realities in mind, I turn to the alternative route, the approach you made, in terms of finances, budget, premises, staff etc. It was simply a case, of assuming that, like you, I was after power over others and or for funds that most are conditioned to use as a means of measure for success! It was simply a case of assuming that I could be treated as A NAÏVE AND SELFISH / EGOCENTRIC OR SOLD OUT SOUL AS ALL STOOGES sent along my path were and happen to be. I need not remind you of the fact that I downloaded and produced to you a printout of clearly defined ministerial duties and responsibilities that were published by the Home Office on the Internet. I attach copy as a reminder. I suggest that you consider the date when the material was downloaded. Consider the fact that you were shown a true copy of the letter from the Rt. Hon. Paul Boateng and consider the simple fact that ‘The CAMILA Project’ search/reference to, by you, was a give-away BECAUSE the *human-rights* (NGO) HomePages had been on line for well over two years!

homin99r.jpg (46663 bytes)

Besides the above copy (Home Office Ministerial duties) I attach a letter dated 1st November 1999 (some nine months after you made contact with me). I suggest that you read that letter to the Chief Executive (then) of / at Haringey Council. I do not have to point out, to you, the fact that MANY ISSUES / IRREGULARITIES AND CRIMINAL OFFENCES ARE COVERED, leading up to the complicity of the police and the staff and officers of / at the local County Court. READ IT ALL, DIGEST IT AND CONSIDER MY DEMANDS FOR YOU TO CLARIFY YOUR MENTALITY, below.

I HEREBY DEMAND that you either justify your most recent and offensive attitude (for over seven months, your convenient defaults now) in respect of your persistent failures to confirm the undertaking by and from Commander Stephen James, last September. The undertaking that the criminal matters, placed before his subordinates, over a long period of time, were to be acted upon has been ignored, apparently, both by the police and EVIDENTLY BY *Y*O*U* AN ALLEGED VICTIM OF THE PRACTICES!

We both know that Mr Singh, was rewarded and recommended for higher pastures after his ‘excellent performance as architect and or protector of the ‘organised disorganisation’ of the wing of CIUKU Enterprises known as Haringey Council, a Local Authority. We both know what followed after he showed his true spirit and colours in the course of a cricket match, later!

YOUR TRUE SPIRIT & COLOURS APPEAR TO HAVE BEEN EXPOSED, *a*g*a*i*n* because of your reckless and or wilful repetitious defaults and omissions. I need not remind you, yet again, that as such your attitude amounted and amounts to nothing short of obstructions to justice FOR THE CITIZENS! Such attitudes and mentalities by and from an allegedly ‘concerned for others’ alleged victim! An alleged victim who, nonetheless, has been and is seen to be ‘working towards the maintenance of the existing practices, while claiming to be ‘working as an insider who joined ‘the ruling party’ in order to bring about changes ‘on his own’, like others that I referred and pointed to.

As of your first defaults and omissions I qualified that human relationships (ανθρώπινες ανταλλαγές) is a two-way traffic and you have established through your repetitious and convenient defaults to be nothing but an egocentric and arrogantly motivated, for personal reasons and undeclared agendas, individual. If you do not wish to co-operate for and in respect of the work called for and warranted in order to cause the police to act AS PUBLIC SERVANTS, you should state so, *p*e*r*i*o*d*. You EITHER co-operate in causing the police and others, to cease behaving as the demigods they are of opinion that they are, OR you acknowledge that you have other and undeclared agendas to serve than the ones you declared, initially. ABANDONING your asserted goals, each time the opportunities arose, for you, to further your allegedly intended aims was noted, time after time.

The concluding words above leading to: "…. hence the maligned obstructions to and for others TO PROCEED AS THE LAW PROVIDES".

Sincerely

Andrew Yiannides

ENCL. 1. ONE A4 page / Internet Home Office Ministerial responsibilities, listing.

    1. THREE A4 pages / Copy letter to G Singh Esq. Haringey Council Nov. 1st, 1999
    2. TWO-page letter ref. 8JFCAOHB to Haringey Council Housing & Social Services 8th June 2001. (Work for a victim who acted as I (*human-rights*) required of him)

And in 2004, reminders as in the facsimile below the crafty one received.

Contact:
webmaster@human-rights.demon.co.uk
Fax: (for UK: 0044) From UK: 0870-0541301
(Not applicable after March 2006)

Non Governmental Organisation
Creators of the human-rights.org
www based Community on Line

http://www.uk-human-rights.org

To: Andy Constanti - OPEN MINDS London Fax: (020) 8800-3265
From: Andrew Yiannides - Human-Rights Org. London Date: Printed 22/11/05
Created:1st June2004
Re: Developments while the REAL CRIMINALS are covered up. Pages: THREE - including this cover page
CC: CoL Re: FRAUD & SOCIETY'S CORRUPTION Reference: 2JEJHBFH
¨ URGENT ¨ For Review ¨ Please ACT - COMMENT ¨ Please REPLY ¨ Please RECYCLE

MESSAGE

Dear Mr Constanti

I refer you to the news that made it to and was reported in all local FREE papers, covering the issue of a Haringey COUNCIL MANAGER who was convicted of FRAUD. There is NO DOUBT IN MY MIND that the news reached your ever so inquisitive person.

  1. The disturbing, to me, issue arising out of the reporting was and remain the words used by the Executive Councillor for Housing, Clr Isidoros Diakides. As you should recall, and must have recorded, the very Clr chaired the meeting in September 2002 when the police Commander UNDERTOOK & PROMISED to deal with the criminals who were engaging in the rampant conversion / theft of Housing Benefit funds. The Clr, the police and you, were fully aware of the facts / practices and SAW / RECEIVED documented evidence in respect of *THE FREE-FOR-ALL* as I COINED the practices. You know why I did so and that it was because of WHO WERE INVOLVED and who were benefiting from the rampant fraud and corrupt practices.
  2. The issue of 'WHY & WHO responsible FOR THE PERPETUATION OF THE STATE OF AFFAIRS' did not and does not rest with the Clr or the police as I explained to you on many instances. And as YOU KNOW from personal experiences, bearing in mind what you initially sought contact with me for, yet 'set-about to promote other interests', it is not what people say but what they do that counts.

I transmit with this FAX an explicit communication covering historical facts which the editor of the paper, to whom it was addressed, published but WITH two deliberate changes that indicate wilful actions intended to mislead the readers. The original has since been transmitted to a Hellenic organisation in the USA for the simple reason that second and third generations of Hellenes, even the present generations in HELLAS itself are not aware of and deliberately kept in the dark about. I am transmitting 'the article' only because of your regular references to Evagoras Pallikarides and his poem that you used so often in your exchanges with me and to politicians in the United Kingdom.

I have published a page at human-rights and THE CONTENT MIGHT INTEREST YOU and any genuine thinking and not indoctrinated (because of associations/teachings followed) or conditioned (like Pavlovian dogs) pseudo-humans.

http://www.uk-human-rights.org/protocol.htm

Sincerely

Andrew Yiannides NDD., ACFI., ATI. FNAAAS

FOOTNOTES
Footnote eXtra: Visitors/readers/researchers are urged to read first the article published in the London Evening Standard, as settled by the Rt. Hon. David Blunkett, Home Secretary in 2003
(*Link to article)
. While there, above it, the explicit letter that was delivered, just a few days earlier, to ex-Minister the Rt. Hon. Frank Field MP. Accessing the material pointed to from the URLs in the letter is of utmost importance. It will assist 'recognition of the citizen's rights at work', when the rights are called upon, appropriately, in truly democratic states. The above in 2003; there were other 'submissions' and among such civilised and, within the law, approaches by citizens that led to the right actions by governments the letters and submissions to the Prime Minister during August to November 1999 (*Link to the page where the explicit letters are published). Readers / researchers should also access the letter to the Home Secretary, the Rt. Hon. Jack Straw, in December 1999 and note the results as evinced in the newspaper article (Hornsey Journal) also within days of the letter reaching its destination (*Link to). Many the charlatans and stooges (lovers and 'promoters of the system as is', on the job for decades that Andrew knows of; all acting as sold souls always do (*Link to one of many that we know of).
   1.  Evidently no one has ever bothered to consider the relevant factors that apply to such scenarios. No one APPEARS TO CARE, irrespective of the words of many a dignitary (*Link).
   2.  The suspect quarters were from within the family of the youngest brother of Mr. Andrew Yiannides. The very person, Mr Savvas Kyriacou Joannides, had been involved in many deceitful activities and the fact that the very solicitor, Mr Kypros Nicolas, did engage in the promotion of the FORGERY (*Link to the forgery ) for perversion and corruption of justice made the solicitor an ideal partner for all intended frauds on any targeted persons, including relatives / family members. Hence the very reason why junior was using the very solicitor for both his own and the solicitors dishonest ends and goals.
    3.   Visitors/Readers/Researchers can link from here to an appeal that arose at the time when we were looking into the Housing Benefit CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUDS & CREATIVE ACCOUNTS BY LOCAL AUTHORITIES (Local Government / Councils in the United Kingdom). The very District Judge, DJ Silverman, we are exposing in our pages. In the past Mr Nicholas Stamoulakatos was complaining of and about the very DJ Silverman. Suddenly DJ Silverman merits a personal letter from the conniving Nicholas Stamoulakatos, an alleged human rights activist / promoter and an alleged defender of the screwed and stitched up victims of the legal system. The intentions of the author were and remain most clear. 'We failed to entice Mr. A Yiannides in the plan for fraud on the Insurers BUT WE WILL PROVIDE FALSE INSTRUMENTS, LATER, FOR ALLEGED TRANSLATION WORK. (We will introduce such in due course as evidence whereby the alleged retainers for alleged Internet Consultancy Services, by Mr Yiannides to the ILfHRoUN shall / can be used accordingly).
   4. XXXXXX ex school mate    the   XXXXX

...

Link to:   Lord Chancellor's Dpt. Link to:   Judges Schooled on racial issues
Link to:   The CAMILA Project   h-r Home Page Link to:   Judges independent of, FREE to ignore The LAW
Link to:   Typical Response from Lord Chancellor Link to:   The LAW   Frank Cunningham-case  

.

 

The creator of this website was inviting victims to access URrights & join him there with other victims to expose & challenge abusers of trust & public office until the providers of the facilities >ning.com< introduced new terms and conditions for the provision of the facilities. Access from here and read of the imposed states by the brains behind ning.com and consider only one element "WHY OBSTRUCT & HINDER THE DOWNLOAD of the existing material at URrights.ning.com >the intellectual properties of the creator of that presence on the Internet and those who joined him there? Read below of the unacceptable conduct and behaviour by the reckless abusers of trust, who set out to obstruct and blackmail the creator of URrights.ning

Persons who are genuinely concerned and object to the ways they were / are being treated by alleged servants of the publicand the law >in any PSEUDOdemocracy, or whatever states / conditions they are subjected to< by abusers of public facilities and public office >as we cover in our web-pages< should contact webmaster@human-rights.org for information relevant to the creation of similar facilities for INFOrmation on URrights, for facilities for URrights EUrope and for a NETwork of URrights activists.

  • APOLOGIES to friends and persons who could not access URrights following the recent changes by the providers of the facility (ning.com) Andrew Yiannides created and used the portal to create the presence on the Internet for the group of victims / challengers who joined with him to expose and challenge the arrogant and blunt abuse of public services in all allegedly civilised societies > PSEUDODEMOCRACIES <.

  • The changes related to the introduction of charges for the facilities, included the facility for ning.com to archive the material at URrights; also the facility to download the archived material to the creator's system (computer) while the creator and his group of friends considered which of the level of charges and service the group was to adopt.

  • HOWEVER the creator, Andrew Yiannides, WAS UNABLE TO DOWNLOAD THE ARCHIVED MATERIAL and all attempts to engage the providers and their staff in reasonable explanation as to WHY THE FAILURES TO CONNECT / DOWNLOAD from the ning.com servers THE ARCHIVED MATERIAL, were contemptuously ignored.

  • Emails to the Publicity, to the Promotion, to the Public Relations, also to the Chief Executive's Office merited no response whatsoever from anyone acting for ning.com

  • In the circumstances Andrew will appreciate any information related to the problems covered above. Andrew will also appreciate any information relative to exchanges with or email postings, from ning.com to existing members.

  • EXISTING URrights members, victims of the legal system, victims of solicitors and the courts should access the updated pages at .org/solicitors.htm and .org/solfraud.htm by using the links from the list below.

Below pages where we expose known lovers of it all, users and maintenance engineers of the system as is

.org/1999dfax.htm .org/1ofmany.htm .org/2lipstalk.htm .org/4deceit.htm .org/absolute.htm .org/abusers.htm
.org/account4.htm .org/actors.htm .org/actors2.htm .org/adoko.htm .org/bankers.htm .org/beware.htm
.org/blunket1.htm .org/chaldep1.htm .org/confraud.htm .org/contract.htm .org/convicti.htm .org/courts.htm
.org/corruptcourts.htm .org/crimesin.htm .org/dreamers.htm .org/evesused.htm .org/evilones.htm .org/famfraud.htm
.org/govolso.htm .org/guesswhy.htm .org/len.htm .org/mauricek.htm .org/media.htm .org/solfraud.htm
.org/solicitors.htm .org/someplan.htm .org/someploy.htm .org/thefacts.htm .org/theproof.htm .org/thenerve.htm
.org/twisted.htm .org/uaccount.htm .org/ukmm.htm .org/uwatchit.htm .org/watchit1.htm .org/yourtax.htm
  • Every single person we name and expose in the above pages elected to ignore THEIR OBLIGATIONS TO REPORT (to 'the serfs' = 'the taxpayers'), THE ABUSERS OF PUBLIC OFFICE & PUBLIC FACILITIES. All were/are relying on the Intellectual Prostitutes, from within the media, to keep it all in the family closet.
  • All, as typical twin-tongue hypocrites carry on complaining about the media for failing to report & for suppressing the facts and the realities they allegdely reported to the hard of hearing, to the otherwise committed angels blowing their silent trumpets for decades, all ready and gearing to welcome the expansion of the New World Order.
  • Of such parts the contributions from and failings of the persons we name and expose, AS IF THEIR OWN SILENCE, THEIR FAILURES  & THEIR BLUNT OBSTRUCTIONS to the work and other actions by the creator of this website, Andrew Yiannides, treated by one and all as if non-existent with the exception when the wily Norman Scarth, set off to abuse the trust he was allowed to benefit from, while his parts and questionable activities / performance were under scrutiny, specifically after HE FAILED to publish the full transcript of the Court of Appeal hearing HE WAS ALLOWED TO RECORD* [*Link from here to the food for thought page created by Andrew Yiannides, in the first instance].
  • Not one ever bothered to address the issues we expose in the explicit page, despite the fact that we have been pointing all of our contacts, since May 1992, to it all.
  • Visitors, readers and researchers are urged / invited to access and read the letter which the Hon. Secretary of the Litigants In Person Society, Mr. Norman Scarth sent to the founder of human-rights, Mr. Andrew Yiannides, reproduced in the page .org/4deceit.htm* [*L]
  • The author's statements, such as 'what for and why seek additional assistance', thereby spelling out his parts as a lover of it all.
  • Common sense dictates, that he should have directed his request to his partners in deceptions aplenty, one & all engaging in fraudulent misrepresentations AND NOTED TO HAVE, WILFULLY, BEEN SUPPRESSING, FROM THE TAXPAYERS, THE FACTS OF LIFE RELATIVE TO THE RAMPANT ABUSE OF THE COURTS FACILITIES as the failure of all to co-operate as covered and pointed to at:- [*L]. One and all fallen to the facilities for fraud aplenty on the taxpayers and the corruption of illiterates in law, the conditioned victims of the legal circles & courts who fall to the blackmail element attached to the REWARD for keeping the realities away from the taxpayers; just like the media and the Ministers responsible for the application of long existing law to the criminal activities we cover in our pages, do.
  • All the while one and all were / are engaging in the scenarios we cover in the exclusive page, which page the author of the letter which Mr Norman Scarth sent to Andrew Yiannides, afforded us the opportunity to address the issue of the contributions of his partners and affiliates in fraud aplenty on the taxpayers; despite the reminder one and all, named in the new page simply shoved it all in the dark corners of their devoid of grey matter skulls, their perverted / corrupted mind(s)

> MOST IMPORTANT <
On Sunday morning, the 19th September 2010, the Deputy Prime Minister, leader of the Liberal-Democrats in the course of the BBC TV politics programme, spoke of the coalition government's commitment to address the element of waste and fraud through the public services sector. We trust and hope that the elements we expose in our pages and the parts adopted by the conditioned victims of the legal circles, the persons who engage in PROMOTING & EXPANDING THE ONGOING CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUD ON THE TAXPAYERS, THROUGH ABUSE OF THE COURTS' FACILITIES, will be on the top of the list of government priorities.
Visitors, readers & researchers are urged to access the letters to Minister Frank Field [*L] after he had been directed by the Prime Minister to think/do the unthinkable.
Link also from here [*L] to the explicit letter to the Home Secretary in December 1998 with submissions arising out of the RAMPANT HOUSING BENEFIT FRAUD
On Tuesday 23rd November 2010, 'the Guardian' in its Comment & Debate page carried an article by Nick Clegg, the Deputy Prime Minister. In the evening of the same day the Deputy Prime Minister addressed a large audience at Kings place in respect of the government's changes on university students fees / loans.
Access from here the page where we reproduce an image of 'the Guardian' article & consider the simple fact that we, alone, have been asserting and proclaiming our objections to the theft of funds from the national budget leading to the ever-increasing annual deficit in the state's balance of payments.

ACCESS:  http://www.justice-uk.human-rights.org/ (For an important message at this Community-on-Line web-site) & thereafter,
Access also http://www.law.society.complaints.and.human-rights.org/ (Judge instigates Fraud On Tax Payers - he knows not the difference between 'imposed' & 'no undue influence'). APOLOGIES FOR THE DISAPPEARANCE OF THIS WEBSITE.It appears that the beneficiary of the work, both for applications to the courts in the United Kingdom and the submissions to the European Court for Human Rights* [*Link from here to the Statement of Facts submitted to the ECoHR], arranged with the providers of the free web space to erase the Intellectual Property of Andrew Yiannides, the founder of the human-rights Community-on-Line, without any reference to the creator of the website and owner of the Intellectual Property!
鼯font> Copyright subsists on all material in our web-site, owned by the authors of same.
Visitors can refer to these pages in any non commercial activity, so long as attribution is given as to source. License to use, for commercial or other specific use of the material, shall have been secured in writing first, from the owners of any property and material from these pages. No material shall be reproduced in any form and by any means without prior agreement and or license in writing from the copyright owners. The Press are invited to contact us if they wish to publish material in the Public Interest, As We Do.
For any problems or questions regarding this web-site contact:  webmaster
...