h-rtitle.gif (7604 bytes)

Crime - Organised - Institutionalised - Corruption - Fraud - Protection Rackets, run and managed by judicial chair occupants, in a free-for-all state of abundance. Note below the arrangements between the administrative, the judiciary and the media; read of the all-embracing guarantee in place, in contempt of all law : the root shall be pointed to.

WHERE IS JUSTICE? Read below:-

"The court has inherent jurisdiction to stay an action which must fail; as, for instance an action brought in respect of an act of State"

*Link from here to founder's tribulations in 1972-75 and marvel at the creativity of allegedly honourable officers of Justice and the Law in the mother of all PSEUDOdemocracies

  • And by extension any act of any public servant who is appointed, retained and maintained by other public servants for all of whom, the state, as employer, is ultimately responsible, including abusers of judicial chair occupancy. Hence, the billions paid out as covered in the affidavit which visitors can link to directly from here [*Link].
  • Link also from here to the founder's conclusions as of 1972-75 when the great Metropolitan police were seen to be nothing but accessories to and abettors of the rampant fraud and corruption through the courts organised and processed to fruition while Members of Parliament were -as they still do- promoting the waffle that amounts to nothing short of:-

'independence of the judiciary to act in contempt of ALL LAW (national and international) in a pseudo-democracy.

*Link from here to proof of the parts the police play in promotion and expansion of the criminal activities instigated, processed and imposed on society by the legal circles. Read of assertions by a typical hypocrite, none other than the Commissioner of the Metropolitan Police, Sir Robert Mark QPM, when he spoke of FALSE RECORDS / FORGERIES by the legal circles while delivering his famous Dimbleby Lecture on BBC-TV in November 1973, 15 months after he received true copy of THE FORGERY advanced and promoted by the licensed criminals : solicitors and barristers for their evil ends in the case that opened Andrew Yiannides' mental eyes to the realities of life in the United Kingdom, a typical PSEUDOdemocracy. Can anyone enlighten Andrew and the millions of victims of the legal circles WHY NO PROSECUTION of the solicitors & the barristers in 1972 or thereafter?.

  • With such a facility in place (the words we point to above) and arrogant abuse of public office, can anyone assert, or argue, that Mr Andrew Yiannides, the founder of human-rights, was not right to determine that Justice has been abducted and that she is held captive in the dungeons maintained by her abductors who rape her daily in their courts? (>Hence the c reation of www.jusaticeraped.org <)
  • ALL Member States of the European Union are subject to the ruling which visitors, readers and researchers can access in the explicit page /yourrights.htm

*Link from here to the realities - in due course also a link to the warning (indirect but nonetheless very clear) for thinkers to recognise 

  • On 3rd March 2008 >someone's birthday< we released a House of Lords PRECEDENT CASE and reveal deliberations by their Lordships in respect of FRAUD - DECEPTION - CONSPIRACY & IMPLIED LIES BY KEEPING SILENT about any wrong imposed on any other.
  • >>> IN THE MEANTIME we have been naming and shaming a number who know of and engage in much more than just approve wrongs imposed on Mr & Mrs Average, the millions of taxpayers, in our allegedly civilised country / state / province / district of the European Union created by politicians, without reference to the taxed for fraud sucker-serfs, allegedly for the benefit of the citizens from FRAUD & CORRUPTION, among other promotions.

Needless to say the case entailed activities and practices by solicitors as Mr Andrew Yiannides was subjected to, decades later, by an old school friend, Mr Kypros Nichola of Nicholas & Co. in London. Mr K. Nichola bluntly abused the trust placed in him and indulged, in tandem with others, in criminal activities intended to cause the damages that were imposed on the targeted 'serf' by accredited - by the Law Society & Bar Council - allegedly Honourable Officers of the Supreme Court, the courts maintained by successive elected governments in the United Kingdom, one of many pseudodemocracies. In due course another revelation relevant to the arrogant 'inherent jurisdiction', through which to deny, obstruct justice & impose all manner of criminally created states on 'the serfs', who are taxed for the cost of maintaining criminals in public office, in pseudo-democracies.

RESPONSIBLE FOR THE STATE OF AFFAIRS, successive irresponsible Lord Chancellors and Home Secretaries who ignored and ignore all complaints and submissions by victims of the organised crimes we point to and expose in our pages, irrespective of the evidence and the law pointed to, by the victims of it all, the citizens who are called upon to pay taxes for the maintenance of criminals in public office.

[*Link from here to our exclusive page, covering confidential fraud as arranged THROUGH THE BEST KEPT OPEN SECRET in alleged democracies, European States. Elsewhere the foundations and corner stone upon which the operatives built the societies of their making using the bricks and mortar we cover in this and other pages. The visitor should not be under any illusion that the stars in the theatrical productions, covered in our pages were by any stretch of the imagination 'humans' who were / are gifted with any attributes that distinguish 'true humans' (>thinkers<) from animals.

Fraud in court  Council staff use Forgeries   Misconduct in Public Office. 2 cases relative to applicable law One Protocol says it ALL It betrays arrogant intentions Law Provides for THEFTS and it covers Judges too Judges' duties   TIME 4 CHANGE   & CHALLENGES Site CONTENTS - Table of Contents & ongoing work Your Rights & OBLIGATIONS to Society SITE SEARCH facility for any specific element / issue of concern to visitors / readers
COURTS : their Facilities Abused For ORGANISED CRIME : FRAUD Solicitor's Perjury & Victim Ignores it all Just like the Law Society always does Blackmailed or is it Just Conditioned & Subjugated Victims who join the club ? We name Lovers of blunt fraud through courts - Users of the facilities 4 illicit gains Local Authorities & FRAUD on 'serfs' the Taxpayers who are kept in the dark Police Party to & Endorsing Criminal Acts, Activities Arrogant Fraud FALSE Records & Contempt of Law by the legal Circles & Public Services The crafty ones & Vexatious Litigant PLOYS for the rewarded silent

* Information FOR victims who wish to co-operate by EXPOSING & CHALLENGING abusers of Public Office *

family.uk-human-rights justiceraped.org dssfraud.htm confraud.htm dadscare.htm contract.htm converts.htm MensAid
solicitorsfromhell.co.uk chancellor.htm theyknow.htm solfraud.htm sheknows.htm 4deceit.htm convicti.htm forward.htm

December 2006 - SUMMONS ISSUED & SERVED IN RESPECT OF FRAUDULENT & RECKLESSLY IRRESPONSIBLE ACTIVITIES & IMPOSITIONS THROUGH THE FAMILY COURTS

*Link from here to evidence. *Link also from here to a case when the abusers of the courts' facilities abandoned their plans for another targeted family

IMPORTANT INFORMATION for all victims of malpractice - misconduct - negligence, etc. TO NOTE

In the civil justice system in England and Wales, a judge presides over the proceedings that are argued by the opposing sides through the adversarial process. The process enables the court, judge, to reach a conclusion as to the truth of the facts in dispute. Thereat it is for the judge to apply the law to the facts proven, established at court.

The system as evolved is covered in the page 'English Legal System' and remains the same after the Woolf reforms.

An explicit Affidavit [*L] plus exhibits and
     letters to a Chief Inspector of Police
[*L],
          one to solicitors
[*L] and another to the Lord Chancellor [*L] evince
               ORGANISED CRIMES
(Access and read the letter to the police in September 2006 [*L])

Access & read from one of a number of letters to the Prime Minister : * I believe that New Labour will deliver us from the wrongs we have been suffering for far too long. Use of our resources in terms of human potential and capabilities can and should be channelled through rights not wrongs, through positives not through negatives. It is our produce and ingenuity we can sell to others not the minefields of corrupt and bankrupt public services. * [*Link from here to the page, note the steps taken to ensure the Prime Minister forwarded / delegated submissions and evidence received at 10 Downing Street to the right Minister / Ministry because the submissions were in respect of ORGANISED CRIMES

3rd March 2011 added link [*L] to the BBC-TV Dimbleby Lecture in 1973 as the Metropolitan Police Commissioner, Sir Robert Mark prepared & presented to the sucker-serfs

...

Read of CORRUPT Detectives, Judges, Lawyers, Ministers - article in the London Evening Standard [*Link to image & text]

solicitors.htm      KEY Changes 12 August   2012

Solicitors  *Page Created February 1997*

hrbnrsml.gif (1162 bytes)

JOIN the Community On Line and publish your Statement of Facts. Member's case at the European Court on Human Rights, paves the way relative to the facts of life and the imposed states through abuse of the courts facilities [*Link]. The evidence you have can and should be used in order to establish the rampant contempt for the evidence and the law by abusers of trust and the courts facilities. have. Use your rights in law (link) and ACT, as / or with others, against the offenders. Join them and chip in for the creation of the mass of evidence against the abductors and rapists of Justice. You can then benefit from THE FACTS and the evidence that you will help establish. It can all be used in any action, severally or jointly with others, as the case may be . Crimes against humanity are not ruled out when a large number of citizens can come up with evidence and as victims concur and or expand upon and on the FACTS STATED & The VIOLATIONS PLEADED as LODGED at the ECoHR, already. YOUR Rights ought not to have been ignored and it is for you, the citizens and victims of the TRIAD (Link) to take stock f the situation and to act as the law provides.

Chip in and help create a Register of Solicitors & Barristers names On Line
Solicitors From Hell
REPORT THE OFFENDERS
Affiliated Sites For The Above Project / Activities   lbduk.org (group)
Read the Statement of facts / Legal Argument by and for the Chairman of Live Beat Dads UK (www.lbduk.org). Do not fail to note the rights pleaded  (paragraphs 5.a & 5.b) in the case of the relationship gone astray, merely because the other side felt the urge and need for a change of partner. Thereafter ONE & ALL just using the innocent children as the vehicle for use in and for the conversion of assets industries, a division of CIUKU Enterprises! Just another "Outrageous Fortune" scenario and opportunity for the "Merchants of Misery"©.

We invite you to take part in DATA collection in the areas covered by The CAMILA Project. Your own contributions are and will be of value to all victims who are active now & to all others who, like you we hope, will be challenging the offenders by using the rights we point to,   assured in law.

IMPORTANT Announcements
Announcement- July 2002

1. Court Proceedings ARE PUBLIC RECORDS FOR ACCESS TO BY THE PUBLIC. Justice to be seen to be done. NO SECRET SCAMS and theatrics behind closed doors. See OUR AIMS
2. Beware of Mischief Makers operating as and or for the Divide & Rule Brigade.
Do not be misled by self- appointed 'gurus' such as we cover in the pages /2lipstalk.htm & /chaldep1.htm who aim to serve the Fraudsters Club as in /confraud.htm (the page) either from within or as guided (by the abductors and rapists of Justice) mischief making  recruits to and for  the 'fraudsters club'. Such persons come up with all sorts of poor excuses, as to why victims should not publish their statements of facts and their evidence in personal web-sites and use their rights as provided by Law. Such persons advise victims to ignore the only facility that provides TRULY OPEN COURTS FOR ALL TO NOTE / RECOGNISE. Facilities no one can obstruct as the abductors and rapists of Justice and their stooges seek to maintain for ever and in   perpetuity to carry on treating that citizens as serfs through their established practices. (Link)
3. READ the affidavit we publish in our pages, as was submitted some years ago in the course of challenging the fraudulent activities at and through the Local County Court, FOR & IN the Housing Benefit THEFTS and conversion to legal costs through similar indulgences and practices as covered in this page/file. 

Essential reading for all victims of the Legal / Judicial system and the Courts Service 
tbcoverr.jpg (35741 bytes)
ISBN 0-586-05983-0
Published in 1983 [*Link to the Chapter on Solicitors]

KEY to page & Site
Definition- roots of solicitor
Page ISSUES - List
SITE Issues - List
Page CHANGES - List
Letters TO  -  List
Letters FROM  - List
Page ARTICLES -  List
Page IMAGES - List
<>

Page ISSUES - List
Solicitors Cheat Legal Aid
Solicitors' Wrong Advice
Solicitors Face Penalties
Solicitor Fined by Law Society
Solicitors USE FORGERIES
<>

Page CHANGES - List
20 June 2004 Created List
'The Guardian' Article - Fraud
<>

Letters TO - List
C.E.O. at Law Society & OSS
Frank Field MP 4 Democracy Prime Minister - Re: CRIME
TREASURY- Rampant Fraud  Solicitors Face Penalties
The TIMES - Re: EDUCATION Haringey Council-Fraudsters
part 2

Letters FROM  - List
Solicitor's Letter EXTRACT
Haringey Council - C.E.O.
Prime Minister Re: CRIMES
Solicitors Face Penalties

Page ARTICLES - List
Fraud Via  Legal Aid Board
Solicitors' Wrong Advice
Solicitors Face Penalties
part 3

Page IMAGES - List
Solicitors Cheat Legal Aid
Solicitors' Wrong Advice
Solicitors Face Penalties
Legal Aid FRAUD June 2004
<>

Site ISSUES - List
1. Rampant FRAUD / CRIME
2. Police Defaults/Omissions
3. Solicitors Parts In FRAUD
4. Court Staff/Officers&Crime
5.
False Instruments-FORGERIES
6. Local Authorities & FRAUD 7. Housing Benefit FRAUD
8. Police ENDORSE Forgeries 9. Court Officers & Forgeries 10.
Office Supervising Solicitors
11. Solicitor Admits FRAUD
12. O.S.S Penalises Solicitor
13. Confidential FRAUD
14. The Fraudsters' Club
15. Accessories to FRAUD
16.
Police In Contempt of Law
17. Judges in Contempt of Law
18.
Judges Accessories to Fraud
19.
Police Accessories to Fraud
20. Police Harass Victims
21. Police Summons Victim
22. A Judge Of Two Minds
23.
Child Support Agency FRAUD
24. BANKING FRAUD - Part+
25.
Family Break Up For FRAUD
<>

Pages Covering Reasons for not approving the LIPS propositions / plans
1. Confidential Fraud - page
2. Challenging Solicitors Lies
3. Two Lips Talking - page
4. Failures to Publish Suspect 5. Just Promoting Negatives
<>

Below proof relative to blunt SUPPRESSION of material facts which the author of the report was made very much aware of in the course of the hearing. Miss Henrietta Steinberg, the junior Barrister reported for the benefit of readers of 'The Solicitors Journal'.
soj75p1r.jpg (431830 bytes)
Above the first art of the article from Vol 119, page 711, circulated on 17th October 1975. In the course of the Court of Appeal hearing, the Affidavit was handled and referred to. It had been forced on the court *by registered mail* after the clerk of the court refused to sign for it and place it on file. No mention of the Affidavit in the report 'created' by Miss Steinberg, who, as a junior, was learning the ropes at the time. The suppressed Affidavit had been settled by the victim of the abductors and rapists of Justice, who took steps to put on record the criminal activities of the legal circles, which activities, the clerk of the Court of Appeal bluntly endorsed through his adamant refusal to sign for the affidavit & the attached exhibits. Of such acts & wilful failures the service of Justice in an allegedly civilised state, a country arrogantly promoted as a civilised democracy resting and founded on principles of Law and Order.  
Part 2 of the offending article by the recklessly irresponsible Officer of the Supreme Court and Justice, Miss Steinberg
sol75p2r.jpg (459202 bytes)
Notable indeed the lack of any reference to the affidavit and exhibits the victim had forced on the court / the abductors & rapists of Justice. Both Buckley LJ and Orr LJ contemptuous of the Law simply indulged at the expense of the targeted serf who, in accordance with 'the inherent [*Link] jurisdiction the judiciary created for themselves, as a serfs should have  no rights to Justice; all care of the elected who represent the suckers who have taxes levied and imposed on them for the maintenance of criminals in public office.

 

 

 

 

 

undercon.gif (286 bytes) Page Revised: August 14, 2012.   Added evidence relative to suppression of the facts and evidence [*Link] & others links to & from
Site reconstruction for better navigation. 

VISITORS ARE URGED to access and READ THE IMPORTANT update and ADDENDA we were obliged to introduce in January 2002. We had no choice but to REPORT THE CRIMES TO THE TREASURY; our observations and knowledge of the constructive frauds made us accessories if we kept quiet, like the alleged victims who work towards the implementation of the schemes by the abductors and rapists of Justice, the Goddess.  You will find the addenda statement at the top of the Updated Pages File. We are sure that you will share with us our concerns and most profound disappointment at and with persons who adopt and promote activities which they know are nothing but downright crimes. We refer to our exclusive page where we expose (as conscientious law abiding citizens) the Confidentiality Between Fraudsters that exists care of the BEST OPEN SECRET. 

Guidelines on Navigating through the extensive material: access instructions.  

As part of the reconstruction process our new pages and pages where changes and additions have been implemented, the improved / amended pages are endorsed with the link 'Page Changes and the date of the last changes. The link takes visitors to a List of the changes implemented in the page. These include new material and links from relevant paragraphs to other or new relevant material in other pages. For further clarification email: webmaster@

"THE MERCHANTS OF MISERY" ©. The traders who run 'the self perpetuating cancerous growth industry'© at the behest of those who rise to public office from within their circles. And, to make it official, they do so with the blessing of the police forces maintained by successive Governments for decades / centuries, when one considers the words of William Shakespeare and Charles Dickens. Altogether the managers of CIUKU Enterprises leading the corrupt and the corrupted, as the corrupters of it all.

Above, our founder's observations in 1975. For over three years the Metropolitan Police were ignoring FORGERIES (*Link); false instruments the solicitors had introduced in High Court Proceedings through which to pervert justice and to generate fraudulent income for themselves and for all others who actively engaged in such criminal acts. All relying on judicial chair occupants to endorse and condone, probably even congratulate, in private, the instigators for the 'brilliant stroke of contempt for the law, as trained' enterprising creations. CRIME endorsed by public servants behaving as if licensed by Parliament to act above and outside the law.

  • The aforementioned persons, from within the Law Enforcement Agencies, whom tax payers maintain at high cost, in office, are appointed by other public servants in order 'to serve the citizens'.
  • Care of persons of such calibre and mentalities the law is not served but criminals and crime are promoted through the convenient defaults routines, their victims are very familiar with. (*See footnote).
  • The aforementioned breach the terms of 'the oath of allegiance and their undertakings to serve the citizens'.
  • Such persons ought not to be free to indulge in crime, as they do.
  • Our judiciary entertain, with their eyes and ears open, such activities within the confines of their theatres while Justice is shackled to the walls in the dungeons of the R.C.J. (*See footnote).
  • Our Law Enforcement Agencies were/are set free to ignore Parliament's Laws; precisely as the police behaved in the Stephen Lawrence murder case (*See footnote). Many other cases 'evincing such facilities and arrangements' too. All the while such persons secure illicit rewards care of the blank cheques industry they have been maintaining for decades / centuries.
  • All of the above from within an alleged modern parliamentary (representative of the people?) democracy. A state that is sold to the world as one that, allegedly, rests and is founded on principles of law and order!
  • THEIR corrupted law; (*Link to the capabilities of the Law Enforcement Agencies maintained by the state). And their 'perversion of justice for pecuniary advantage Orders for the benefit of the dishonest handlers of the properties of others, nowhere mentioned by the state or the media.(*Link to acknowledgement of the media contribution for the lies.... lies..... lies.)  Starting with 'the rights in law' and 'recourse to law in order to regain rights and properties STOLEN by criminals.
  •  

HOWEVER, DO NOTE that

On 30th July 1998 the headlines in the 'Daily Mail' were clear. An investigation was announced, intended to cover the serious issue of bribes and corrupt practices in high places. The words used qualified that THE UNTOUCHABLES* [*Link] were, and as far as we know to this day they ARE, being investigated along with senior police officers. The untouchables, naturally, was but a reference to the legal professions, etc.

Pending a response from the solicitor who was engaged to the young lady who took her own life (and in whose memory our founder has dedicated the *human-rights* web-site) we shall publish an explicit letter that was sent to the aforesaid solicitor. He treated the letter, at the time when it was sent to him, in the usual manner of his profession. He chose to ignore it. HE HAD BEEN RETAINED TO LOOK AFTER THE INTERESTS OF THE BEREAVED MOTHER of the girl. It suffices, to state that he was dismissed by the mother on substantive grounds. The young lady was so right  GREED(*F) RULES SUPREME* [*Link]; service does not come into the equation of the legal profession, no matter who the client is. TOP of the agenda, always, how best to protract, RAILROAD and HIJACK any court action in order to generate income through abuse of the Courts' processes with the blessings of those who rise to public office, as independent of the law 'judicial persons' who then act injudiciously and in contempt of the law and all evidence. Misconduct In Public Office - their pre-occupation.

The Home Office and the Lord Chancellor's Office should get together on the above issue and consider Mr Geoffrey Harold Scriven's affidavits and the Statement's of fact he submitted to us and we published because of the Public Interest elements. We know thousands of victims of the TRIAD that is in control of CIUKU Enterprises, need to acquaint themselves with their rights, as assured in law, and to challenge in offenders accordingly.

The news headlines on 13 January, 1997 most welcome (Link). The fact is that the media and the authorities were being bombarded with regular complaints on the issues by victims of the legal circles. That the authorities were releasing 'such material was a start. Even without the attached element of fraudulent abuse of the facilities, as we cover in our pages, the realities were being addressed, somehow. The fact is that dishonesty and fraud are crimes, and crime without punishments just flourishes and blossoms.

We shall be bringing to the forefront other cases, in the near future, as victims of the TRIAD come forward and publish their experiences through the  ***human-rights*** Non Governmental  Organisation and the COMMUNITY ON LINE facility, provided for free. A typical example of published facts and evidence can be accessed (Link) and the scenarios and activities we cover in the above paragraph can be recognised by the most simple of persons who can read the facts:-

  • The victim submitted and lodged the STATED FACTS (Link) and the VIOLATIONS (Link) of human rights by and from within the Legal circles and the courts, as settled / argued and developed, in law, by Andrew, the founder of the *human-rights.org.* and creator of the Community On Line.
  • The victim's application to the European Court of Human Rights is published at the victim's Community On Line web-site (Link to the actual page/file).
  • In another page, clearly stated, the reliance on solicitors, on barristers and expensive precedent cases were/are covered; all facts and established law BY HIGHER AUTHORITIES, were contemptuously ignored by a judicial chair occupant, who acted not judiciously but simply used the opportunity for the creation of more of the same, income generation facilities for the legal circles, by locking the targeted citizen/victim to appeals and more litigation.
  • In the above page too, 'THE DUTIES OF A JUDGE, IN CIVIL PROCEEDINGS are covered (Link).
  •  

In February 1997 the long suffering citizens were informed of propositions and plans to penalise abusers of the Legal Aid facilities (press release). We knew of such practices, and in fact challenges were instigated in 1975 when two firms of solicitors were using the facility for and with the usual 'creative scenarios' for an attempted conversion of a property to legal costs through charges for the theatrical productions. Details will be released at http://www.uk-human-rights.org and we expect of the sycophant and hypocrite who instigated a telephone call, solely intending to promote the usual 'divide and rule' scripts from and by tutored mischief makers, to apologise for the vile assertions to the person he telephoned, sometime in October/November 1999. He had seen and read an affidavit and an appeal that arose in the aforesaid attempts by the solicitors we refer to. In the premises the undisclosed attempts at mischief-making (the telephone call) behind the scenes, with all subsequent abuse of our time and facilities plus his attempts to secure a defaulting, in material facts statement, from Andrew will be published in our pages as part of our contribution to 'the need for provisions that judicial chair occupants be made accountable, as Andrew submitted in 1995 in the course of the Festival Of Rights and in particular in the course of the debate, "Can We Trust The Judges?"

THE MINISTERS AND THE MEDIA EDITORS SHOULD KEEP THE PUBLIC INFORMED as to the position since the article 'of news' we refer to above appeared in the Daily Mail on February 5 1997.  Promises...., promises.... IF ANY ACTIONS are taken by the authorities, more news releases please, and on a regular basis. Not just whenever we and other citizens challenge them all, we pleaded then.

In November 1999, the Lord Chancellor His Lordship, Lord Irvine appeared before the Home Affairs Select Committee to inform them of the exciting (Link) new developments. We had our reservations because of ongoing theatrical scenarios and productions / presentations in which members of the LIPS crowd were involved. We simply waited for developments because of propositions by and the aims of the leaders of the group/crowd. We were aware that a number of the crowd/group appeared to have adopted the propositions from the leaders as their own, and preferred, way forward. We publish in other pages material that clarifies our founder's position (Links - list). Our concerns and observations in 1997 were well founded:-

  • We reported abuse of the facility  to the Legal Aid Board and to the authorities as of August 1996
  • The abusers of public office, from within the Local Authorities, the Local Courts (Link) and, in particular, the police were very much aware and conscious of the constructively engineered fraudulent activities we reported to the authorities.
  • A challenge and the result is published in our pages.
  • We expect of the sycophant and hypocrite, who was introduced by the LIPS crowd/mob to Andrew and to *human-rights* to re-acquaint himself with the facts and the evidence he knew of and perused, in the course of the months he had been in contact with, and secured co-operation from Andrew.
  • Assistance and facilities were secured because of agreed causes and actions to be taken. It was not for other purposes but as agreed and it was not as he chose to act consequential to securing assistance under false pretences and through fraudulent misrepresentations and by suppressing his activities behind the scenes with other misrepresentations, false assertions and plenty of suppressed material facts.
  • The above person, like the solicitors he was for ever complaining about, expected of, and in fact wanted Andrew to suppress material facts and evidence, in a statement / affidavit he asked of Andrew to provide him with. Andrew did settle an Affidavit and included the most fundamental of issues, relevant in the circumstances that applied 'to the activities and defaults by 'the victim' with other plans throughout his contacts with *human-rights* and Andrew.
  • The 'victim' had been issued with a copy of the letter, from the Legal Aid Board, just like other members of the LIPS Crowd/mob, asserting 'victims of the TRIAD status'. The letter qualified the fact that the dreamers at the Legal Aid Board did not succeed with the fraudulent demands solicitors expected 'to impose through their mates at the Legal Aid Board (Link).
  • He had been told, also, that the solicitors who failed him (when he benefited from a custodial sentence UNJUSTIFIABLY) were one of the firms of solicitors that we reported to the Legal Aid Board, for abuse of the Legal Aid facilities.
  • Such realities and evidence were of no interest and or of concern to a person who later established where he had stood on the issue of 'constructive frauds through the courts and in particular on the issue of abuse of the courts' processes for and by the fraudsters club, that we cover in our exclusive page.
  • legal  and sentenced  / ) , and the m. Through defaults and omissions to exercise their public duties diligently and as the evidence established/establishes  the most lucrative area of business for the managers of CIUKU Enterprises. We were not surprised to read of the press release in January 1997. Odd that we never heard of any prosecutions, though. Somehow the press release was/is an empty tin just making some noise that must have been dampened by the authorities or the media barons who have their page 3 mammary glands priorities and the 22 leather kicking 'heroes' to cover, along with the news of who bedded whom, sleaze. Great staff for the education of the nation and the creation of the society to suit and serve their long standing plans. 
The HEADLINE below suffices.
  • The news cover the core element in legal services.
  • More to the point is the issue of 'doing it with intent in order to tie their clients to endless theatrical productions.
They have to make a living, somehow. 
  • One way is to generate work for one another; also as others organise, determine and direct*. [*Link]
  • Read "The Breeding Grounds - case"* [*Link] and note the systematic directions, from the young constable through to the Court staff, the Lord Chancellor's Department, and court officers ("...it will cost you.....").  QUITE A SET UP. Constructive frauds on 'the sucker-serfs', as organised and operated for centuries (refer to 'Bleak House' by Charles Dickens) in the bastion of MODERN(!) Democracy(?).
  • The report, on the right, from 'The Times' consequential to an investigation by WHICH?  the Consumers Association to the point, indeed very clear.
  • Readers & Researchers should access the extract from the work of Stephen Knight which we reproduced in our pages. We did so AFTER we put to the test one of the most vociferous and alleged victim/challengers, a noted lover of the systems as is, one Mr. Maurice Kellett. His ranting about the Free Masons ranks second only to the relentless promotions by the puke production machine, Mr. James Todd of VOMIT repute. Both, as with others who engage in similar activities, have simply been acting as 'subliminal indoctrination operatives'. Recipients and readers of their output are simply bombarded with the one message, in essence: "Read and listen to what they did to me.... look at what they did to me.... there is nothing you can do..... look what they did to me". 

lawyers1.jpg (100089 bytes)
The extract we point to, on the left, covered also, among other activities, the element, stated in the above headline. The work was published in the mid 1970's following comprehensive research and investigations into the issues the author set out to look into. (*Link to the explicit extract)

Back to: Yard INVESTIGATES the  untouchables (Legal Circles)
MOST IMPORTANT: - Link from here to a House of Lords precedent case and WAKE UP MISGUIDED SERFS. Consider the issues their Lordships deliberated upon as long ago as 1939 - 1940 and THEN ASK ALL OF THE PROMOTERS OF ALL MANNER OF DIVERSIONARY TACTICS, including the ever-present jargon & waffle that amounts to SUBLIMINAL INDOCTRINATION THROUGH THE STATED & IMPLIED: -   "Do NOT challenge them; DO NOT DO AS I DID FOR THEY WILL DESTROY YOU, LIKE ME....." and in the background their aims to suck in victims of the system IN ORDER TO COERCE & USE THEM WITH CONVERTS TO THE SYSTEM OF OPERATIONS who are operating as FRAUDSTERS-CLUB- RECRUITS; the only interest of all : 'to use new victims, they are pointed to -as one Hussein was pointed / sent along to a recognised CONVERT-TO & LOVER-PROMOTER, AN OPERATIVE OF THE SYSTEM AS IS : NOTHING BUT CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUD THROUGH THE COURTS & REWARDS TO THE CONDITIONED / INDOCTRINATED / COERCED suckers who overlook the fact that the taxpayers, including their children, grandchildren and generations to come WILL BE PAYING TAXES TOWARDS THE NATIONAL DEBT CREATED BY ABUSERS OF THE COURTS' FACILITIES as endorsed and acquiesced by alleged servants of the public - THE ELECTED REPRESENTATIVES OF THE TAXPAYING CITIZENS IN PSEUDODEMOCRACIES.
[*Link from here to Mr Andrew Yiannides' definition of a true Democracy, and consider that the reference to 'autumn', relates to election times. However, no election can be said to be truly democratic when the truth and the realities ARE SUPPRESSED WITH INTENT, by abusers of trust and by persons who secure the trust of the citizens -and the targeted- through FRAUDULENT MISREPRESENTATIONS, at the heart of approaches and promotions by persons who simply seek personal pecuniary advantage and gains -financial or otherwise- as the many fraudsters -we name and expose- who were sent along by managers & organisers of 'the system as is', the system created by followers of the teachings, by examples stated, in the most vile of works ever to have been presented (misrepresented in reality) by the creators of it and their 'apostles' ever since inception of the vile ploy and its subsidiaries]
The headlines on 13 January 1997, below, most welcome.

Link to 'The Facts':

1.  Arrogant attempts to abuse the courts' facilities* [*Link] in 1997 and earlier. We publish solicitors letters & exchanges, also exchanges with an arrogant Court Manager whose mentality to the citizens' rights and to the law (assuring citizens protection from crime and criminals) matched the arrogance and contempt for the evidence and the law, that judicial chair occupants engaged and engage in, systematically.

Released through the media the all important recognition of the fact that the Legal Aid facility was / is abused by sharp operators, mainly the licensed fraudsters who benefit from annual Practice Certificates issued by the Law Society.
60mlafr1.jpg (84384 bytes)
THE FIGURE RELEASED WAS CHANGED ON A NUMBER OF INSTANCES, as more of the fraudulent activities of the licensed criminals were reported / recognised.

*Link from here to the case that opened Andrew Yiannides' eyes to the criminal activities ongoing in the courts in the United Kingdom, when, in 1972, solicitors engaged in the promotion of a blunt forgery in a High Court case, resting and founded on 'documented' commercial fraud.

2.  Activities ONGOING in 2004*   Access, read and note that one of the solicitors mentioned in 'the Guardian' newspaper article did expose himself to have been a typical fraudster who, most definitely, was offering invisible services to the other side in matrimonial / divorce proceedings >just as other solicitors engaged in<.
*Link from here to 'The Guardian' article, by Clare Dyer below, and consider the simple fact that we pointed to the police the improprieties solicitors were indulging and engaging in. Abuse of the courts facilities >FOR ORGANISED FRAUD< on targeted citizens and specific funds was / has been in the order of the day >for decades that we know of<.More specifically the Housing Benefit funds owing and payable to the targeted >providers of accommodation< the accommodation needed for the imposed / imported refugees and asylum seekers rushing to the United Kingdom, to the land of milk of honey, as to other European Economic Community countries / states. The influx as arranged and imposed by the unelected European Commissioners 'busy and pro-active in creating / imposing the New World Order, as planned for decades / centuries ago.

Worse, in the very same case and client, referred to above >2.< other solicitors and the Law Society itself, finally, seen to be party to the constructive frauds >plural intended< on the targeted 'serf'. Arrogant obstructions to rights >most definitely assured in law< (for which the retainer of solicitors), YET ONE & ALL noted to be operating / acting / indulging in contempt of the restraints of Parliament's Law, engaging also in THEFT OF FUNDS FROM THE CLIENT'S BANK ACCOUNT, as the Law Society has been and is recorded in bank statement / records. The article pointed to above related>with the evidence submitted to the President of the Law Society< in explicit / succinct submissions to the Intellectual Prostitutes that John Swainton spoke of when he delivered his retirement farewell to his colleagues.

3.  The very solicitor referred to above, years later, reported in 'The Guardian' article as one of the many who were engaging in abuse of the courts facilities by using refugees(?) and asylum seekers(?) in organised abuse of the courts facilities and fraud on the facilities for Legal Aid funding.

*Link from here to an article at www.justiceraped.org/2012/08/a_dedication/ and note the facts related to the media Intellectual Prostitutes, noted and observed to be promoting half-baked potatoes while suppressing the realities and the evidence they are pointed to and receive.


In February 1997, the lawyers and their activities under scrutiny
The press release by the Lord Chancellor's Department, the news, also, that lawyers were to face penalties over Legal Aid work as published by the Daily Mail, on 5th February 1997, was welcome by us.

We suggest, however, that our visitors access the next 'announcement by the Lord Chancellor (*Link) and from there to follow up to the next announcement by the government ON THE VERY ISSUE   return to main text]

lawyr3r.jpg (35260 bytes)

THE HEADLINE BELOW SAYS IT ALL.

TIED BY LAW?

Not convenient arrangements?

loinsolr.gif (110962 bytes)
2004, the Law Society discovers (?) what the public have been SHOUTING MOST LOUDLY in the blocked ears of those who issue annual Practice Certificates to arrogant abusers of trust, fraudsters of the most offensive kind.
  • JUNE 2004 'The Guardian', its roaming ambassadors failing the citizens for decades, has learned, we are informed, of the activities being reported to it for over three decades, by victims of the legal circles. (*F8)
  • The 'serfs' are informed that its reporters learned (from the Law Society presumably) what we have been pointing to the very newspaper (among other high profile shapers of the New World Order) for over three decades.
  • Hooray! We now await for the other eye to open and for the editors to CEASE RELYING ON ALLEGED LEGAL GURUS to guide them on how best to serve the citizens, whom they have been taking to the cleaners for far too long.
  • Time for 'the media Intellectual Prostitutes to USE INTELLECT and common sense; to cease acting as lap-dogs to their masters, the controllers of the media.
  • Time for the editors to cease using Press Releases and to start using material, such as EVIDENCE with the STATEMENTS OF FACTS, the victims provided and furnish to them IF they are to be seen to be serving the citizens instead of the organisers of crimes against humanity as spoken and written of for far too long. (*F7)

We will be pointing the legal correspondent and the editor of 'The Guardian' to material where we cover the rampant constructive frauds and the activities of 'The Fraudsters Club Recruits'. They have  been promoting , for far too long 'such services', in an allegedly civilised and democratic society. In the meantime the 'serfs' ARE KEPT IN THE DARK and treated as 'morons of no consequence', but good for taxes to meet the cost of THE DOUBLE FRAUD we cover in the exclusive pages 'The Guardian' and other papers have been asked to access and 'deal with the billions of stolen 'tax revenue' [*Link]. It is now a matter of conscious and or moral duty: "To fully inform the citizens, of the facts of life within the legal circles and the THE SYSTEM"

alaf4agf.jpg (404661 bytes)Among the solicitors named in the article one who indulged at the client's expense and in offering invisible services to the opposition, by failing to act as the client instructed and procedure commanded.
We can't help feeling that thanks to our vigilance in the matter of the Housing Benefit scams at Haringey Council in North London, that our contributions through submissions and pressures on the Legal Aid Board between July 1998 and December 1998, were instrumental in the press release. Also we feel that our submissions to the Home Secretary [*Link from here to our explicit letter] and to the Prime Minister over the very issues did contribute to the news item on 19 May 1999. The announcement, from the Lord Chancellor's Department, that cowboy lawyers* are to loose access to Legal Aid funds and facilities, was most welcome. It was/is about time that the Lord Chancellor, and the government, considered appointing 'genuine laymen' on panels looking into complaints about the activities of lawyers, and in complaints submitted to the Legal Aid Board, too. We shall be publishing material and evidence attached to issues raised in our pages. In particular the instances when there were blatant abuses of Legal Aid certificates that wrongly were authorised by public servants for the benefit of 'the merchants of misery' © in contempt of facts, evidence and 'The LAW'.
THE DEFINITION
Solicitor from 'solicit' :
[15th century via French solicitor from Anlatin sollicitare 'to disturb', from sollicitus, literally 'completely moved', from sollus 'whole' + citus, past participle of ciere 'to move' (source of English excite). PLEAD FOR SOMETHING to try to get something by making insistent requests or pleas. ASK SOMEBODY to plead with or petition a person or group for something. GET SOMEBODY TO DO SOMETHING WRONG to attempt to draw somebody into participating in illegal or immoral acts.
In a nutshell the root of it all, clear : 'TO DO SOMETHING WRONG'

Extract from a letter written by a solicitor to his client in March 2003

The recipient was authorised, by the author, to extent to us permission to use the extract we publish below. We know that it will merit the essential consideration by Members of Parliament and other PUBLIC SERVANTS. We look forward to the day when all cease being party to the usual gross misrepresentations to the citizens. Above all we look to PUBLIC SERVANTS to cease all co-operation / and or reliance on the criminals who abducted and are raping Justice, the Goddess, daily. AFTER ALL we are supposed to be a civilised state that rests & is founded, allegedly, on principles of law and order. [*Link from here to a precedent case, to a House of Lords rulings in respect of failures and WRONGS IMPOSED ON CITIZENS / LITIGANTS, BY SOLICITORS, dating back to 1939-1940]. We released details in March 2008, after keeping it on the shelf (up Andrew's sleeves) since 1975. Read of their Lordships' deliberations on CONSPIRACY, LIES & FALSEHOODS, MISREPRESENTATIONS, FRAUD and above all of the element of ELECTING TO ADOPT SILENCE & KEEP QUIET ABOUT WRONGS THROUGH WHICH THE IMPOSITION OF DAMAGES on third parties. *Link from here to the page where we point and cover realities, which 'alleged victim-challengers' of the practice & the fraudulent activities in the courts have been ignoring for years. We need only add that the persons we name and expose in our pages, simply elected to endorse it all and to promote / expand the activities as converts to and lovers of fraudulently created benefits, as covered in the page]

...... "I was frankly astounded to read your second paragraph. This is the first I have heard of `risk assessment', i.e., assessment of divorcing fathers to determine suitability for fatherhood in the future. How anybody can have come up with this idea is absolutely beyond me. They are not suggesting doing the same for divorcing mothers or divorcing female non-mothers! I should have thought that having had fifty years experience of "Government agents" in all their forms, judicial, Court Welfare Service, Probation Service and Social Workers, nobody would have wanted to go within a mile of Government agents". This is apart from the utter absurdity of the idea. You say it remained on the xxxxxxxxxxxx website for nearly a year. Who put it on there in the first place? I am unaware of what I assume is some kind of internal battle - I assume this from your reference to stopping xxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxx and to xxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx being wrongly thought to favour it. I would be interested to know how it got on and what its supposed purpose was to be and who are the promoters. I suggest you e-mail my 24th March letter on to xxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxx at the e-mail address you give.

As to your further analysis, you are absolutely right that the conceptual infrastructure does not exist or has been subverted. I have seen, for more than twenty years, members of various organisations who seem to think that if only Parliament ordained more clearly or the judges got a lecture on where they were going wrong, the situation would be put right. Most of the judiciary are well aware of what they are doing and perfectly satisfied with the consequences [*see F6]. You would actually have to begin again and you will only be able to begin again when sufficient MPs have been educated into what has been happening. This was a close thing in 1983 when 315 MPs put down an early day motion for investigation into this. The Government fobbed them off with a 1984 Act which only made things worse with the wholehearted co-operation of the controlling element in Campaign for Justice in Divorce virtually all of whom disappeared from activity shortly afterwards. Other organisations have tended to get going for a while and then fade out. I agree that Court secrecy and gagging of dissident opinion does prevent MPs to a considerable extent from having information on what the Courts are doing, until they are involved themselves, and often not then if they have gone to establishment law firms.

With kind regards

++++++++++++++
NOTE from Mr. Yiannides who released the above extract, from the letter, for the benefit of all: - Many the converts to the system of operations, and many the dreamers who entertained notions that all 'citizens' are as naive as they were / are. One has to consider the simple fact that one is faced with tutored & used stooges, persons who promoted and promote alleged interest by Members of Parliament who set up Early Day Motions, which the victims / constituents promote, in respect of the wrongs attached to and arising out of impositions on the citizens through contempt of Parliament's Law and the rules of procedure at court, by abusers of judicial chair occupation. ONE & ALL were pointed to the fact that Mr. Andrew Yiannides, first got to know of the criminal activities instigated, set in motion, processed and executed through abuse of the courts facilities and in contempt of all law. All were informed of the fact and realisation that the criminal activities ongoing in and through the courts were of no interest to the police & to Ministers who received complaints of and about such activities, from Mr Andrew Yiannides, for the first time, way back in 1972. All, alleged victim-challengers were made aware of the arrangements, in place, by the Administrators of Parliament's Law (judiciary) which we released, eventually, in our pages. *Link from here to the most obvious of arrogant abuse of public office and fraud -suppressed reality- from the taxpayers as the Executive in Government, Parliament -successive elected representatives of 'the sucker-serfs' in a pseudodemocracy.-; the media barons and the Intellectual Prostitutes they retain and maintain simply promote all manner of false states and wilfully / recklessly suppress the realities (such as the facilities and practices we point to in this very page and other pages).  AND WORSE STILL, the organised constructive FRAUDS (plural intended) are suppressed by alleged victim-challengers who failed and fail to point to the material facts we relate to and cover in our pages AND with vile (anagram of evil) intentions (with the exception of a few and some lousy actors) they failed to make public, themselves, the criminal activities ongoing in and through the courts, notwitstanding the fact that facilities were on offer as of the last year of the old millennium -1999 TO ERXPOSE & CHALLNGE THE ARROGANT ABUSERS OF THE COURTS FACILITIES..

From ‘The Brotherhood
Chapter 21
SOLICITORS

    Masonry is very powerful among solicitors in England and Wales. According to a survey in which I questioned all the solicitors in twenty selected towns, and a cross-section of London solicitors, it is less prevalent in the capital than it is in the provinces. This assessment of the situation from a Cambridgeshire lawyer who, although not a Mason, knows a great many Freemasons and receives regular unofficial briefings from members of the Brotherhood, rings true:
    In London there are plenty of other things to do. Life is much more impersonal and Freemasonry is not necessarily going to do a solicitor a great deal of good. What is more, good solicitors are so thin on the ground that if you are really good, you don’t need to be a Freemason to et your clients. And if you're not any good, being a Freemason is not going to impress your client.
    Solicitors, specially those outside London, have a particular incentive for becoming Freemasons. By the rules of their profession they are forbidden to advertise. They are therefore reliant upon passing trade, which is often sparse, and recommendation, which is hard to get. I have interviewed countless solicitors who joined Freemasonry purely to get on close terms with the businessmen and the worthies of their community, and to gain personal contact with police, JPs, magistrate’s clerks and any local or visiting members of the judiciary – men they could rely upon either to put business their way or whose good offices would be professionally valuable.
    One young ex-home Counties solicitor told me that after he began to practice in his own town he was regularly advised by local Freemasons to join the Brotherhood. He resisted because of his religious convictions – he was a practising Christian – and because he was repelled by the idea of being unable to succeed on his own merits alone. But business was so bad that he eventually relented to the continuing pressure of his colleagues in the firm and to their promises that by becoming a Mason he would get all the clients he needed. He said: ‘I was initiated and within days clients began to contact me out of the blue. Within a few weeks I had more that I could cope with. That went on for some months, but it troubled me, and I left Masonry before being made up to the second degree. Most of my clients melted away as fast as they had appeared. They were all Masons. So I moved to London. You don’t need Masonry or advertising if you’re good here – there’s more litigation than all the London solicitors can deal with.’ (*F4)
    The governing body of the 40,735 solicitors in England and Wales (in the mid 1970's : our italics) is the Law Society, which has its headquarters at 113 Chancery Lane, London WC2. The Society controls the admission of solicitors and the education trainee solicitors. Although no solicitor may practice without Certification by the Law Society, membership of the Society is not compulsory. At the end of March 1982 33,226 practising solicitors were members of the Society and 7,509 were not.
    The Law Society is one of the most Masonic institutions in the world. This has proved an almost insurmountable obstacle to certain ‘profane’ individuals involved either willingly or unwillingly in litigation with Masons, because it is the Law Society whose job it is – with Department of Health and Social Security – to decide who will be awarded legal aid and who will not. It also dictates the conditions on which legal aid is granted in each separate case. The difficulty is compounded if the subject of any proposed action by an applicant for legal aid is not only a Mason but a solicitor as well. There are cases where the decision whether or not an individual should be granted financial aid in order to pursue his case or defend himself against a case brought against him has been in the hands of close colleagues of the applicant’s counsel.
    A great many of the sixty-odd members of the Law Society as well as a high proportion of the Society’s staff and committees – one estimate puts it as high as ninety per cent of all male staff above the age of thirty – are Freemasons.
    I have thousands of papers on one case alone, a case so well documented it can be followed in minute detail. It involves one of the many Masonic members of the Law Society Council, who had personally committed an act of gross negligence which caused one of his clients to lose £100,000 inheritance. Deliberate action on the part of several other firms of Masonic solicitors – some of the biggest names in the legal profession – acting in collusion with the original solicitor and with each other to cover up the negligence, brought the client to the edge of financial ruin. Having mortgaged his home, spent £15,000 in legal fees to lawyers who deliberately ignored his instructions, wasted valuable time and generated hundreds and hundreds of expensive, unnecessary documents, he was forced to apply to the Law Society, of which his chief opponent was an influential member, for legal aid. Finally, in 1982, after a direct appeal to a senior and non-masonic official in the Department of Health and Social Security, which works in tandem with the Law Society on legal aid applications, he was granted a legal aid certificate – but on extremely onerous conditions. As this case is still not closed, and far from lost following recent unexpected developments in the client’s favour, no further details can be disclosed as yet.
    The term ‘masonic firm’ is used more often in the law than in any other profession. This is because there is a greater preponderance of companies which are exclusively run by members of the Brotherhood in this area of society than elsewhere. It refers to those firms of solicitors whose senior partners are, without exception and as part of a deliberate policy, Freemasons. In such firms, and this is equally true in London as in the provinces, most of the junior partners will also be ‘on the Square’. Some Masonic firms will not allow the possibility of a non-masonic partner. In these cases only existing brethren will be taken on. In some larger Masonic firms there will be one, perhaps two, of the junior partners who are not Masons. These non-Masons generally never even suspect the secret allegiance of their fellow partners. At a certain stage in their career they might receive an approach from one of the Brothers within the firm – not a blunt invitation to join, but a subtle implantation of an idea, a curtain twitched gently aside. Usually if this is passed over nothing further will occur. If it is recognised and rebuffed , the non-Mason will probably be looking for a partnership elsewhere shortly afterwards. As work becomes unaccountably more demanding and as he finds he no longer seems to measure up to the standard expected of him. Most will not realise that it is the standard which has moved in relation to them rather than vice versa. This does not often occur as the senior men in Masonic firms ‘have been taught to be cautious’, and do not make overtures to outsiders without having first established that the odds are in favour of a sympathetic response.
    Many of the largest and most prestigious firms of solicitors in London are Masonic firms. During my research for my book Jack the Ripper – The Final Solution, I was introduced to Ben K-------, an elderly Royal Arch Freemason who had been a partner of one of these firms for more than thirty years. An avid and jocular Mason, Ben told me often how appalled he was by the frequent misuse of masonic influence, especially in his own profession. He gave me a lot of help in my researches in the early seventies and we have kept in touch since. In 1980, the year before I was commissioned to write The Brotherhood, he mentioned a case which had been brought to his attention by one of his fiends at another top London (masonic) firm. This friend was likewise infuriated by the corruption of Masonry’s precepts. The case involved blatant misuse of Freemasonry to conceal criminal conduct on the part of a senior partner in another, even more prestigious, masonic firm. At that time I was in the middle of my second novel and was convalescing from a major operation, so I did not follow it up.
    In June 1981 I saw Ben again, and I asked if he could get further details. Meanwhile, I went to see the main casualty of the alleged Masonic conspiracy. He was visibly shocked at how much I knew of his case. He was also a very frightened man, and told me that he was thinking of joining the Brotherhood himself for his own protection. As a result of harrowing personal experiences, he had come to hate the power of Freemasonry, but believed that becoming part of it was his only hope of survival in the highly masonic world of the law. Whether or not he was right in this, it does indicate the tremendous power certain cliques of Masons can exert. It was clear that he wanted very much to speak about his experiences, that his conscience told him he should. But in the end his own sense of self-preservation triumphed and he told me regrettably that he could not help me to publicise the evils which had nearly ruined him.
    All was not lost. Ben, my Royal Arch companion, phoned me late in July and said he had ‘a little something’ for me. We met in the Freemasons Arms in Long Acre that evening. His ‘little something’ was a bundle of photocopies tied up in red tape: the complete file on the case.
    The story begins in 1980 at the offices of one of the most celebrated firms of solicitors in London. A fashionable yet long established company, it counts several members of the nobility among its clients. Only one partner of this firm whom I shall call Gamma Delta LLB, was not a Freemason. Delta, who had been with the company for seven years, handled general litigation.
    One of his senior colleagues had to take an unexpected period of leave. Delta was asked to handle the Mason’s work during his absence. As he worked through the documents, familiarising himself with the various cases, Delta became increasingly puzzled. Finally, to his horror, it dawned on him that his absent partner was engaged in corruption on a large scale. The papers made it clear that the solicitor, acting in case after case on behalf of clients seeking compensation from insurance companies, was in fact in league with the insurance companies. He would settled out of court for sums much lower than he and the insurers knew could be obtained, and he would then receive a rake-off from the insurance companies. Delta at first found it impossible to believe. ‘I had no idea such things could happen,’ he told another of my informants, a client of his colleague and a victim of his deliberate malpractice.
    Stunned by what he had found, Delta at first did not know what he should do. At last, having checked and rechecked the papers to make certain there was no other explanation, he approached the senior partner of the firm and showed him what he had found. The senior partner immediately called a partners’ meeting – and Delta was sacked on the spot. There was no explanation given, merely that his services had been dispensed with, and within two days he was on the street. Why the partners had not been as horrified as he by the conduct of his criminal colleague he could not imagine. It was only then, when he approached a barrister friend who was Mason, that he learned that the company he had worked for had, without giving it a moment’s consideration, been a Masonic firm. He had had the temerity to attempt to expose not a crooked and negligent lawyer, but a crooked and negligent Freemason lawyer. Having been found out, that Freemason was in distress. And his colleagues were all of the mould of Mason which takes it as read that, no matter what qualifying clauses appear in Masonic ritual, a fellow Mason must be extricated from distress at all costs. There was also, of course, the consideration that if the case came into the open, the inevitable publicity would harm the whole company.
    The manner in which Delta was dismissed was designed to give him no credence should he talk about the documents he found. When an instant dismissal of that kind occurs in the legal profession, there is usually only one inference: the person sacked has had his hand in the till.
    Delta’s first move was to approach another of the leading firms in London, another ‘big name’ company much involved in the world of international finance. The company agreed to act for Delta in his claim against his erstwhile employers for compensation for termination of partnership. But according to an informant within this second company, which also turned out to be a Masonic firm (this is also documented) dropped Delta like a hot potato. Not only did they drop him after they had agreed to act, they actually then agreed to defend the first firm in any case brought against them by Delta.
    Eventually, though, Delta found a solicitor who was not a Mason and, evidently fearing adverse publicity, the original firm settled out of court, paying Delta £50,000 compensation.
    But even after he got his money, and set himself up in his own practice elsewhere in the country, Delta was still aware of the potential power of Masonry to ruin him, and decided that the only safe place was within.
    This ‘if you can’t beat ‘em…. ‘ attitude is prevalent, especially among tradesmen and the proprietors of small business in all parts of the country.
…….

FOOTNOTE
Footnote eXtra: In October 2010, the coalition's Attorney General, in an interview published by 'COUNSEL' specifically spoke of the police distancing themselves from cases of (small-fry) fraud and asserted that he was making that element his department's priority. IT REMAINS TO BE SEEN, WHAT the coalition of the Con-LibDems, THE GOVERNMENT OF THE DAY, WILL IN FACT ATTEND TO THE RAMPANT FRAUD. IF IT WILL DEAL APPROPRIATELY with the criminals who abuse public office, especially when faced with appropriate submissions and claims that will be delivered in due course. Visitors/readers are urged to read the article published in the London Evening Standard, as settled by the Rt. Hon. David Blunkett, Home Secretary in 2003 [*Link from here to the article we reproduce in another webpage and consider "Why tolerate the arrogance of the legal circles who had and have the audacity to assert to the lawmakers that the lawmakers have nothing to do with the law"]. While there, above it, the explicit letter to ex-Minister, the Rt. Hon. Frank Field MP, delivered a few days earlier. ALL alleged victim-challengers who contacted Andrew Yiannides, by the time the letter was sent to the Minister, received copy of the letter just as they received copies of other letters submitted to government maintained Ministers and other official appointees to public office. Accessing the material pointed to from the letter (URLs) is of utmost importance. It should assist 'recognition of the citizen's rights at work', when called upon properly in truly democratic states. The above in 2003; there were other 'submissions' and among such civilised and, within the law, approaches by citizens that led to the right actions by governments, the explicit challenges when we set about exposing one of the most evil of alleged victims of the legal circles to have ever contacted us [*Link to our explicit submissions to (a)  the Prime Minister, (b) the Chancellor / Treasury, (c) the Home Secretary. WE acted so after we had secured more than enough evidence about the parts of an alleged victim whose only interests were (i) the rewards under the table FOR KEEPING QUIET about the ORGANISED FRAUD THROUGH ABUSE OF THE COURTS' FACILITIES and (ii) her parts in blunt attempts that were intended to discredit the person she was sent along to mess about with, Mr Andrew Yiannides]. Access please the letter to the Home Secretary, the Rt. Hon. Jack Straw, in December 1998 [*Link* [*L] from here to the letter] and note the results evinced in the newspaper article (Hornsey Journal) also within days of the letter reaching its destination. Many the charlatans and stooges -lovers and 'promoters of the system as is'- on the job for decades; one and all acting as sold souls always do [*Link [*L] from here to the evidence we point to relative to the parts of one of a number of sold to the system fraudsters who were sent along / introduced to Andrew Yiannides by the managers / organisers of the LIPS crowd / mob].
   1.  Defaults by the legal circles: The most circulated / known statement about the convenient defaults and omissions, failures to take steps / ACT for the client-suckers, are the words / statement to Stephen Knight when he was researching 'The Brotherhood'. A member of the human-rights.org Community on Line, one Maurice Kellett., had been pointing to the words (from SK's research / work) which words, he (MK) copied in a web-site (not the Community on Line site he created). He was asked to introduce bookmarks to the words for persons who had been contacting us with complaints about 'the established practices', in order for other members to link to the words and thus create a mosaic through inter-linked STATEMENTS OF TRUTH & THE COMMON PRACTICES. The fact that the link was to introduce additional traffic to his other web-site was 'immaterial' to a promoter of the system as is. It was obvious that the member was not co-operating because he was simply engaging in what we have known to be 'The SUBLIMINAL INDOCTRINATION PROMOTIONS', just like the puke production machine James Todd of VOMIT repute. Through his incessant repetitions of "Look at what they did to me", the point made as he was busy stating indirectly: "Do not challenge the operators of the system if you do not want to end up like me"
[*Link above to a case detailed in 'The Brotherhood']. You can also link from here to another 'convenient failure by a solicitor'. A case with A DIFFERENT TWIST. Access it and note how the abusers of the Legal Aid facilities, capitalise in the distribution and transfer of your taxes to themselves. You only need to refer to the present headlines and consider the simple fact that 'The Guardian', in 2004, only 29 years after ignoring the blunt criminal activities, the legal circles were indulging in at, in and through the courts, all of a sudden came out of the lethargic slumber its successive editors have been in.
   2.  For RCJ read Rampant Corruption Jockeys and look up the word jockey in a good etymological dictionary. When you have grasped it just consider the fact that our judiciary wear wisdom caps (wigs) and that for the original, genuine articles horse hair was/is the material.
   3.  In our pages we publish and point to THE LAW IN PLACE. Torment & Torture through acts and or OMISSIONS is covered by the law. The police did not just fail to act but they ensured that the torment and torture of the family of the murder victim (Stephen Lawrence) continued. AND THE FAMILY'S LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES made plenty of dosh out of their own defaults and failures to ever refer to or USE THE LAW
[*Link from here to an authority's most clear of conclusions / findings]. Any wonder WHY the UK is the member of the European Union that squanders (unchecked) the highest of Tax Revenue Income to the Legal Circles through the abused Legal Aid facility? Partaking in theatrical productions through contempt of statutory provisions in place [*Link from here to our challenge of the Attorney General] is but the cement that binds together, ex-solicitors & barristers with the new generations of abusers of the courts facilities (judges). The Attorney General's team, drag victims of the legal circles in the courts in contempt of existing provisions / precedent cases about the activities of the legal circles while defaulting public servants just carry on indulging in the art of tormenting and torturing victims of crime [*Link from here  to revelations when WE COULD HAVE INTERVENED to challenge fraudsters operating out of an alleged pro-active victims group, the LIPS crowd/mob, when we knew of and recognised that arrogant abuse of the courts facilities were to be the objective of ongoing theatrics and constructive frauds through the courts for more plundering of taxpayers contributions to the budget]. In a lighter vein you could access the page where we relate how and under what circumstances "The Police Summonsed A Victim of HIT & RUN Crimes to court. *Access from here the briefly stated facts, and have fun at the offending public servants as their victim did. No doubt victims of similar practices will recognise that it was all part of the ADDITIONAL contribution to the evil impositions on a targeted law abiding citizen, a victim of a FORGERY and plenty of false instruments by the legal circles, INCLUDING ABUSERS OF JUDICIAL CHAIR OCCUPATION all the way to the Court of Appeal [*Link from here to the evidence when 2 two Lord Justices were ignoring the element of WHY the introduction and promotion / use of the Forgery? Worse why impose financial demands of the victim, in contempt of an existing House of Lords ruling, 36 YEARS EARLIER relative to the activities by the solicitors the two Lord Justices could not possibly ever justify, as the police and Ministers did, by asserting that the judge's duties under the non-existent Constitution of the United Kingdom was / is sacrosanct and no one can interfere or be seen to interfere with the judges' INDEPENDENCE in the execution of their public duties.  *Link from here to the case when the House of Lords dealt with the issue of costs attached to fraudulent court proceedings].
   4.  Readers, researchers and in particular VICTIMS OF THE LEGAL CIRCLES, the POLICE and the COURTS should access from here*
[*Link] the Application for Judgment in respect of the Default Summons founded and resting on rents not paid by the fraudster Nihal Wijemuni and his partner / wife. It was released in the public domain after the police failed to prosecute him and the brother of his partner / wife, Mr Nono Concalves, for the criminal damages to the vehicle of the brother and agent of the landlady who was targeted, as arranged with / by alleged servants of the public operating out of Haringey Council and Haringey Police, ALSO FOR THE CRIMINAL ASSAULT ON THEIR VICTIM, Mr Andrew Yiannides, who ended in hospital with a punctured vein and was attending physiotherapy for months because of the damages to ligaments and muscles. In the same page where the URL (above) links to, an affidavit settled by the solicitor, Antons of Haringey, Green Lanes, London N4, as retained and instructed by a third party, for a concocted and inexcusable claim by the fraudster / criminal Nihal Wijemuni. The affidavit evinces the fact that a police officer, one P.c. Holder had lent himself to more than the invisible services by the abusers of public office who were & still operate out of Haringey police as licensed criminals. XXX
   5.   Link from here to an explicit page* where we publish submissions to a County Court when solicitors, using an Eve, indulged in the usual manifestations. It is for the average visitor / reader / researcher ALL tax-payers / ALL sucker-serfs / ALL victims of the legal circles and the abused court facilities to take on baord the realities pointed to. It is for THE INDIVIDUAL TO RECOGNISE WHY THE ABUSERS OF THE COURTS FACILITIES backed off. Most offensive of the VILE (angram of evil) USE OF THE COURTS FACILITIES was the Court Order / directive (from an abuser of judicial chair occupation) whereby the targeted male WAS TO HAVE NO RIGHTS TO QUESTION / CROSS-EXAMINE THE EVE on the issues the fraudsters incorporated in what was, allegedly HER Statement of facts.
   6.  Reference to 'consequences' in the letter from the solicitor to the client is BUT A SICK JOKE. The question arises " WHAT CONSEQUENCES?" Was the solicitor writing of and about anything real and factual or was the solicitor just waffling? One simply has to consider the realities we POINT TO IN THIS VERY PAGE, whereby a junior Barrister, Miss Henrietta Steinberg
[*Link] reported a Court of Appeal hearing, when REFERENCES TO A BLUNT FORGERY WAS ELATED &  RAISED BY THE VERY VICTIM, who lodged (forced affidavits and exhibits on the court). It hap[pened to have been A CASE OF COMMERCIAL FRAUD that was issued out of the High Court, and that fraud of an officer (qualified or aspiring, immaterial) of the Supreme Court, recklessly misreported (as usual) the case hearing. >>>NOTHING UNUSUAL, when it comes to criminal activities by the very same circles, the licensed and allowed by the state to indulge in the free-for-all state of abundance, CRIMINALS. Of such services the victim of the original Commercial Fraud, a beneficiary. Of such 'the services to Justice', by the type / kind / of judges the solicitor was asserting in his letter -decades larer- 'the judges know what they are doing (as authorised by the controllers / managers of the starte / country .a PSEUDOdemocracy allegedly fouded and resting on priciples of law and Order) and they are aware of the consuequeneces...' <<< WHERE BE THE CONSEQUENCES??? In due course the creator of these pages, the victim of the MISREPORTED CASE, by Miss Henrietta Steinberg who was a witness to the ORGANISED CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUDS ONGOING at and through the abused High Court facilities WILL ACT AS THE EVIDENCE PUT TOGETHER OVER THE LONG YEARS OF RESEARCH, COMMANDS. The cheated, deceived and defrauded of much more than the original CASE FOR THE COMMERCIAL FRAUD CLAIM, the 'sucker-serf', Mr Andrew Yiannides (Re: case Yiannides -v- Radley Gowns Ltd) will release evidence whereby some 20 years later two High ranking politicians, both BARRISTERS THEMSELVES > Mr Tony Blair QC and Mr Paul Boateng < acknowledged to Andrew Yiannides and wrote in an official letter (House of Commons) of the element of "FRAUD IN THE LEGAL SYSTEM" at which time demands will be made of the government of the day TO ADDRESS THE VERY ISSUE & ELEMENT of CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUDS INSTIGATED & IMPOSED THROUGH ABUSE OF THE COURTS FACILITIES. 
   7.   *Link from here to the page where we publish THE FORGERY the police elected to ignose in breach of their public duities and as part of their services to the very element we were and we have have been pointing to for well over three decades. MARVEL AT THE VERY FORGERY the two Lord Justices Orr & Buckley elcted to shove in te dark cormners of their corrupted midsets as followers and promoters of the teachings by examples stated in the most fraudulently misrepresent of works ever, the Old Testament.    years   XXX 
   8.   XXX 
   9.   XXX 
  10.  XXX
Link to:-   h-r Home Page    Link to:  To Lawyers Page 1   Link to:   FORGERIES   Link to:   Breeding Grounds-case    Link to:    Frank Cunningham-case    Link to:   Police Summons the Victim  

Link to:-   Making it official   Link to:   Scriven H-P  Link to:   Link to:   Scarth-cases    Link to:   The Blank Cheques Industry    Link to:   The CAMILA Project   Link to:    The LAW    

Link to:-   Cowboy Lawyers   Link to:   Fraud Vitiates Judgements  Link to:    Scriven - cases  Link to:     Lord Chancellor's Dpt.    Link to:  Corrupt Britain  Typical victim case & Behaviours
Link to:-   Lawyer Admits Fraud   Link to:   Office for the Supervision of Solicitors   Link to: House of Lords RULINGS in 1940   Link to:  Misconduct in Public Office  
...

Back to HomePage 

The creator of this website was inviting victims to access URrights & join him there with other victims to expose & challenge abusers of trust & public office until the providers of the facilities >ning.com< introduced new terms and conditions for the provision of the facilities. Access from here and read of the imposed states by the brains behind ning.com and consider only one element "WHY OBSTRUCT & HINDER THE DOWNLOAD of the existing material at URrights.ning.com >the intellectual properties of the creator of that presence on the Internet and those who joined him there? Read below of the unacceptable conduct and behaviour by the reckless abusers of trust, who set out to obstruct and blackmail the creator of URrights.ning

Persons who are genuinely concerned and object to the ways they were / are being treated by alleged servants of the publicand the law >in any PSEUDOdemocracy, or whatever states / conditions they are subjected to< by abusers of public facilities and public office >as we cover in our web-pages< should contact webmaster@human-rights.org for information relevant to the creation of similar facilities for INFOrmation on URrights, for facilities for URrights EUrope and for a NETwork of URrights activists.

  • APOLOGIES to friends and persons who could not access URrights following the recent changes by the providers of the facility (ning.com) Andrew Yiannides created and used the portal to create the presence on the Internet for the group of victims / challengers who joined with him to expose and challenge the arrogant and blunt abuse of public services in all allegedly civilised societies > PSEUDODEMOCRACIES <.

  • The changes related to the introduction of charges for the facilities, included the facility for ning.com to archive the material at URrights; also the facility to download the archived material to the creator's system (computer) while the creator and his group of friends considered which of the level of charges and service the group was to adopt.

  • HOWEVER the creator, Andrew Yiannides, WAS UNABLE TO DOWNLOAD THE ARCHIVED MATERIAL and all attempts to engage the providers and their staff in reasonable explanation as to WHY THE FAILURES TO CONNECT / DOWNLOAD from the ning.com servers THE ARCHIVED MATERIAL, were contemptuously ignored.

  • Emails to the Publicity, to the Promotion, to the Public Relations, also to the Chief Executive's Office merited no response whatsoever from anyone acting for ning.com

  • In the circumstances Andrew will appreciate any information related to the problems covered above. Andrew will also appreciate any information relative to exchanges with or email postings, from ning.com to existing members.

  • EXISTING URrights members, victims of the legal system, victims of solicitors and the courts should access the updated pages at .org/solicitors.htm and .org/solfraud.htm by using the links from the list below.

Below pages where we expose known lovers of it all, users and maintenance engineers of the system as is

.org/1999dfax.htm .org/1ofmany.htm .org/2lipstalk.htm .org/4deceit.htm .org/absolute.htm .org/abusers.htm
.org/account4.htm .org/actors.htm .org/actors2.htm .org/adoko.htm .org/bankers.htm .org/beware.htm
.org/blunket1.htm .org/chaldep1.htm .org/confraud.htm .org/contract.htm .org/convicti.htm .org/courts.htm
.org/corruptcourts.htm .org/crimesin.htm .org/dreamers.htm .org/evesused.htm .org/evilones.htm .org/famfraud.htm
.org/govolso.htm .org/guesswhy.htm .org/len.htm .org/mauricek.htm .org/media.htm .org/solfraud.htm
.org/solicitors.htm .org/someplan.htm .org/someploy.htm .org/thefacts.htm .org/theproof.htm .org/thenerve.htm
.org/twisted.htm .org/uaccount.htm .org/ukmm.htm .org/uwatchit.htm .org/watchit1.htm .org/yourtax.htm
  • Every single person we name and expose in the above pages elected to ignore THEIR OBLIGATIONS TO REPORT (to 'the serfs' = 'the taxpayers'), THE ABUSERS OF PUBLIC OFFICE & PUBLIC FACILITIES. All were/are relying on the Intellectual Prostitutes, from within the media, to keep it all in the family closet.
  • All, as typical twin-tongue hypocrites carry on complaining about the media for failing to report & for suppressing the facts and the realities they allegdely reported to the hard of hearing, to the otherwise committed angels blowing their silent trumpets for decades, all ready and gearing to welcome the expansion of the New World Order.
  • Of such parts the contributions from and failings of the persons we name and expose, AS IF THEIR OWN SILENCE, THEIR FAILURES  & THEIR BLUNT OBSTRUCTIONS to the work and other actions by the creator of this website, Andrew Yiannides, treated by one and all as if non-existent with the exception when the wily Norman Scarth, set off to abuse the trust he was allowed to benefit from, while his parts and questionable activities / performance were under scrutiny, specifically after HE FAILED to publish the full transcript of the Court of Appeal hearing HE WAS ALLOWED TO RECORD* [*Link from here to the food for thought page created by Andrew Yiannides, in the first instance].
  • Not one ever bothered to address the issues we expose in the explicit page, despite the fact that we have been pointing all of our contacts, since May 1992, to it all.
  • Visitors, readers and researchers are urged / invited to access and read the letter which the Hon. Secretary of the Litigants In Person Society, Mr. Norman Scarth sent to the founder of human-rights, Mr. Andrew Yiannides, reproduced in the page .org/4deceit.htm* [*L]
  • The author's statements, such as 'what for and why seek additional assistance', thereby spelling out his parts as a lover of it all.
  • Common sense dictates, that he should have directed his request to his partners in deceptions aplenty, one & all engaging in fraudulent misrepresentations AND NOTED TO HAVE, WILFULLY, BEEN SUPPRESSING, FROM THE TAXPAYERS, THE FACTS OF LIFE RELATIVE TO THE RAMPANT ABUSE OF THE COURTS FACILITIES as the failure of all to co-operate as covered and pointed to at:- [*L]. One and all fallen to the facilities for fraud aplenty on the taxpayers and the corruption of illiterates in law, the conditioned victims of the legal circles & courts who fall to the blackmail element attached to the REWARD for keeping the realities away from the taxpayers; just like the media and the Ministers responsible for the application of long existing law to the criminal activities we cover in our pages, do.
  • All the while one and all were / are engaging in the scenarios we cover in the exclusive page, which page the author of the letter which Mr Norman Scarth sent to Andrew Yiannides, afforded us the opportunity to address the issue of the contributions of his partners and affiliates in fraud aplenty on the taxpayers; despite the reminder one and all, named in the new page simply shoved it all in the dark corners of their devoid of grey matter skulls, their perverted / corrupted mind(s)

> MOST IMPORTANT <
On Sunday morning, the 19th September 2010, the Deputy Prime Minister, leader of the Liberal-Democrats in the course of the BBC TV politics programme, spoke of the coalition government's commitment to address the element of waste and fraud through the public services sector. We trust and hope that the elements we expose in our pages and the parts adopted by the conditioned victims of the legal circles, the persons who engage in PROMOTING & EXPANDING THE ONGOING CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUD ON THE TAXPAYERS, THROUGH ABUSE OF THE COURTS' FACILITIES, will be on the top of the list of government priorities.
Visitors, readers & researchers are urged to access the letters to Minister Frank Field [*L] after he had been directed by the Prime Minister to think/do the unthinkable.
Link also from here [*L] to the explicit letter to the Home Secretary in December 1998 with submissions arising out of the RAMPANT HOUSING BENEFIT FRAUD
On Tuesday 23rd November 2010, 'the Guardian' in its Comment & Debate page carried an article by Nick Clegg, the Deputy Prime Minister. In the evening of the same day the Deputy Prime Minister addressed a large audience at Kings place in respect of the government's changes on university students fees / loans.
Access from here the page where we reproduce an image of 'the Guardian' article & consider the simple fact that we, alone, have been asserting and proclaiming our objections to the theft of funds from the national budget leading to the ever-increasing annual deficit in the state's balance of payments.

ACCESS:  http://www.justice-uk.human-rights.org/ (For an important message at this Community-on-Line web-site) & thereafter,
Access also http://www.law.society.complaints.and.human-rights.org/ (Judge instigates Fraud On Tax Payers - he knows not the difference between 'imposed' & 'no undue influence'). APOLOGIES FOR THE DISAPPEARANCE OF THIS WEBSITE.It appears that the beneficiary of the work, both for applications to the courts in the United Kingdom and the submissions to the European Court for Human Rights* [*Link from here to the Statement of Facts submitted to the ECoHR], arranged with the providers of the free web space to erase the Intellectual Property of Andrew Yiannides, the founder of the human-rights Community-on-Line, without any reference to the creator of the website and owner of the Intellectual Property!
鼯font> Copyright subsists on all material in our web-site, owned by the authors of same.
Visitors can refer to these pages in any non commercial activity, so long as attribution is given as to source. License to use, for commercial or other specific use of the material, shall have been secured in writing first, from the owners of any property and material from these pages. No material shall be reproduced in any form and by any means without prior agreement and or license in writing from the copyright owners. The Press are invited to contact us if they wish to publish material in the Public Interest, As We Do.
For any problems or questions regarding this web-site contact:  webmaster
...