KEY Page Changes 4 Feb. 2007
||O.S.S & O.L.S.O *Created
a Network / Community On Line and work with others for the
Common Good & a Better World.
Challenge & Expose
Fraud & Corruption
Publish your Statement of Facts and the Evidence you have. Use your rights in law
(link) and ACT
with others against the offenders. Join
in a class action.
Citizens complain and the Internal
Protection racket is set in motion. Deception, lies and false assertions amounting to
misrepresentation abound. Read the last paragraph in the article below and consider the
responses you received as a victim of both solicitors and the protection racketeers sold
as THE OFFICE for the Supervision of Solicitors.
Link to OCR text
in the main panel to the right.
More Paper Exercises and dust in your eyes?
Will the agents of citizens, the MPs and government in a 'democratic(?) state act as Thomas Jefferson and his government did? OR will
the government in waiting ACT as Promised in 1995, after acknowledging THE FRAUD IN (and
through) the LEGAL SYSTEM ?
The introduction from OLSO loud and clear...
government's expectations also loud and clear ... and in line with the
undertakings in 1995; the promises by
and from the government in waiting.
The OSS - grinds to a halt, the Law
Society in a mess and the complaints go on rising at the rate of 380 per week. The
latest statistics point to 1 complaint for every 2.4 solicitors, a mere 42% ! Could any
industry survive a 42% returns rate?
The OSS was called to investigate
the case we publish below. The 'Advertiser' is a local free paper and the scanned
image below is from the Haringey issue of 20th October 1999.
We will appreciate information if the news item made the national papers and in
particular the broad-sheets
|The legal circles
use a FORGERY in attempts to cause a victim of fraud to abandon his legal action against
the criminals who indulged.
|All were relying on
High Court judges to ignore the law applicable & to impose through FALSE INSTRUMENTS
of their own creation legal costs for the pleasure of being denied rights to protection
under the laws of Parliament. And the police / Law Society as indifferent to the
activities as any follower of the teachings by examples stated in the most vile of works
ever to have been arrogantly misrepresented to the naive and gullible who were/are sold
false states allegedly resting and founded on principles of law & Order
|Letters FROM - List
1. MP to Lord Chancellor 95
2. Lord Irvine to MP 1999
We add that one of the solicitors mentioned in the
article is to feature in explicit challenges of and to the Law Society, the licensee of
criminals who destroy families as covered in the page /internco.htm
letter below to the very solicitors who determined that the taxpayers
should reward their client for the evil activities of the legal circles and the courts.
[*Link to their
above letter points to improprieties by two firms of solicitors. We refer visitors,
readers & researchers to the letter from the Legal Aid Board we published in the
public domain years ago. In the meantime many the fraudsters club recruits who shoved
their heads in the sand & ignored the element of WHY the Legal Aid Board were caused to abandon their demands of
the victim whose rights in law and assets the solicitors targeted. All ignored the
fact that 'the serf' had issued a Default Summons and that it had been served in respect
of rents owing; the issues are covered in the above letter. It is dedicated to all abusers
of office at and within the Law Society and its clone, the OSS, also to staff and officers
of the Legal Aid Board, the skin of which changed and was renamed Legal Services
Fat Cats - Plunderers
Visitors, readers and researchers can link to the Lord
Chancellor's submissions to the Home Affairs Select Committee in November 1999.
||Page Revised: August 10, 2012 *Links 1. from 'Corrupt Courts' practices, 2.
To 'For Suckers To Awake' on principles of
relevant Law; 3. Added material to our
submissions in respect of news article - Laws Society activities & Press Releases - below
|Site under reconstruction for better navigation and incorporation
of additional material and updates
VISITORS ARE URGED to access and
READ THE IMPORTANT update and ADDENDA we were obliged to
introduce in January 2002. We had no choice but to REPORT
THE CRIMES TO THE TREASURY; our observations and knowledge of the constructive frauds
made us accessories if we kept quiet, like the alleged victims who work towards the
implementation of the schemes by the abductors and rapists of Justice, the Goddess.
You will find the addenda statement at the top of the Updated Pages File where it was
first published. We are sure that you will share with us our concerns and most profound
disappointment at and with persons who adopt and promote activities which they know are
nothing but downright crimes. We draw your attention to our
exclusive page where we expose (as conscientious law abiding citizens) the Confidentiality Between Fraudsters that
exists care of the BEST OPEN SECRET.
Guidelines on Navigating through
the extensive material: access instructions.
As part of the
reconstruction process our new pages and pages where changes and additions have been
implemented, the improved / amended pages are endorsed with the link 'Page Changes and the
date of the last changes. The link takes visitors to a List of the changes implemented in
the page. These include new material and links from relevant paragraphs to other or
new relevant material in other pages. For further clarification email: webmaster@
Office for the Supervision of Solicitors
of the Legal Services Ombudsman in its annual report for the year 1998/99 was
'encouraging'. We simply drew attention to the obvious which we publish below. No
further comment from the victims of the 'system' is warranted for the Ombudsman acted as
responsibly and as sensitively as the situation commanded. Drawing attention to the fact
that the OSS and the Law Society have not pulled their socks
up and that they failed to heed the warnings and advice from OLSO
In the previous year's report the 'advise'
from OLSO was "...in the absence of any significant and tangible results by
the end of 1998, the OSS' promises of to-day could become tomorrow's EMPTY rhetoric. I
also warned that, unless solicitors themselves shouldered the responsibility for
effective complaints handling, the OSS ran the risk of being overwhelmed by the SHEER
VOLUME OF COMPLAINTS with which it was dealing. It gives me no satisfaction to report that
my warning message has gone unheeded and my prediction has become reality".
Government has made it abundantly clear that it expects the legal
profession to operate its complaints - handling systems in the public interest and in a
way that inspires public confidence".
may well be too much for a bankrupt organisation. As we understand it the Solicitors
Indemnity Fund has been in the red for decades (*Link to letter from the DTI). Its members
should either guarantee its liabilities (if not trading under a guarantee) or cease
expecting public servants, in judicial chairs, to entertain the constructive frauds they indulge in systematically at
the expense of the public. The latter should bring the message home through instructions
from the government that 'fraud in the
legal system' will no longer be tolerated and that the police and home office WILL ACT
in matters that rest on and breach criminal code; any criminal activity must be
prosecuted; that should put an end to the tribulations of the much
tested public and the OSS will have less complaints. The government HAS TO BE SEEN TO
BE ACTING as promised to Mr. Andrew Yiannides in 1995, when in opposition. [*Link to the exclusive letter]
NO NEED TO COMMENT.
The pile up of the odd 25,000 complaints to which the 380 additions every week speaks
loudly. Any decent manager should be able to work out how many new members of staff
are needed. Naturally all staff must be ready willing AND ABLE TO DEAL WITH the
issues of each complaint AS OPPOSED TO looking for excuses through which to delay and
protract; solicitors themselves must be prepared to shoulder responsibility for mistakes
and deal with such. The inherent mentality of "...lets create more work for the
legal professions and the courts.." HAS TO CEASE if the public is ever likely
to have ANY confidence in the legal professions, let alone the court services. When
a solicitor admits the practice of ".... reward by paper weight, not quality
or service... "© as our founder wrote of in 1975, the system and public
servants who entertain the practices and even instigate such activities need proper
supervision by laymen who are familiar with 'the system' and are TRULY INDEPENDENT OF IT.
Intriguing news. The Law
Society and the OSS acted against an offending solicitor. Very
interesting is the fact that the persons who complained to the Law Society were solicitors
themselves. Solicitors, evidently, HAVE RIGHTS unlike ordinary citizens who complain about
much more serious issues than failures to appeal. The citizens are milked dry daily as the
proverbial cow; they are abandoned by the lawyers who deceive and cheat them through
criminal activities that are entertained and endorsed by our Law Enforcement Agencies, as
the cases we report and cover in our pages establish. Clear and indisputable criminal
activities indulged into in the Geoffrey Harold Scriven case. It is remarkable that
they do not treat complaints from the public as readily and in like manner as in the
reported instance above. We do have to consider the fact that the offending
solicitor did not just ignore the client's right to an appeal. Irrespective if the
solicitor was of opinion that the client stood no chance (for argument's sake) AS INDEED
HAPPENED on appeal. What was and is intriguing IS THE FACT THAT THE LEGAL
PROFESSIONS were obstructed from access to Legal Aid funds for the appeal. When
citizens, as PAYING clients, complain about much more serious issues, such as deliberate
suppression of material facts and documented evidence, systematically indulged into by
solicitous and barristers in their quest for extra work (appeals in corrupted cases
standing no chance in our courts) NO ONE CARES AND NO ONE ACTS. Blatant criminal
activities by the legal boffins as licensed criminals. The police are fully aware that
such activities are CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUDS on the clients (through abuse of the courts'
processes, as the 'proverbial milking of the cow cartoon depicts) the victims can
report the criminal activities INCLUDING FALSE DECLARATIONS
AND DOCUMENTS such as the blatant FORGERIES used in the Haringey Housing Benefit scams and
constructive frauds on the private landlords*,
the police simply ignore the FORGERIES and have as yet to prosecute the criminals. Very
simply the law does not apply to the legal circles and professions especially so IF THE
CRIMES ARE ENDORSED by persons sitting in judicial chairs, misconducting in public
office*. The practice certificates of the legal professionals guarantee them immunity
from prosecution for any misconduct and or criminal activity indulged into in the course
of theatrical productions in our courts.
|In 1998 the long
suffering public is informed of problems.....
complaints keep rolling in and all the Law Society & OSS can come up with was to shut
- Below the text of the article (using Optical
Character Recognition) from 'The Times' of 6th May 1998, image of which we reproduce
on the left margin window. In the left margin window another article, also on the same
issues, as published in a local free newspaper; we ask readers, researchers and victims of
the legal circles, specifically victims of malpractice by solicitors to consider our
observations on the issues we point to, especially as to WHY, WHAT FOR and HOW the Press
Release by the Law Society, when all that infamous institution had been doing for decades
(ever since Mr Andrew Yiannides was the victim of fraudulent abuse of the courts'
processes) was and had been to bury all complaints through ARROGANT CONTEMPT FOR THE LAW
merely because the police & judicial chair occupants are part of ORGANISED CRIME
THROUGH ABUSE OF THE LEGAL SYSTEM & THE COURTS' FACILITIES. [*Link from here to evidence - a FALSE instrument
that was even FORGED by the creators & promoters of such a document simply intended to
pervert & corrupt justice care of the protection rackets operated through abuse of the
courts' facilities; *Link also from here
to additional proof, stated realities when others relied on the very same promoter
of the Forgery (decades earlier) to assist them through his invisible services
FRAUDULENTLY SECURED (or so they all thought) PECUNIARY ADVANTAGE which in any event could
also lead to the creation of additional work & income for the criminals who abuse the
citizen's need to seek justice when wronged]
- We have underlined the last paragraph, of the text below,
for the enlightenment of our visitors and for victims to cross relate that text and the
content of the article in the Haringey Advertiser of 20th October 1999, reproduced in the
left below 'The Times' article. Victims could compare such 'news' with
the way they were treated as victims of "The Self-Perpetuating Cancerous Growth
Industry" (© AY) & as added in 1993 "...flourishing as part of the CIUKU
Enterprises in our country, care of the Rampant Corruption Jockeys who misconduct in
public office" (© AY).
TIMES' - Wednesday May 6, 1998
'Solicitors Watchdog Awash `With Complaints'
By FRANCES GIBB - LEGAL CORRESPONDENT
A WATCHDOG yesterday announced measures to
curb a 30 per cent rise in complaints about solicitors and to increase its efficiency.
The Office for the Supervision of Solicitors (OSS) will no longer look
at a complaint until it has gone through a firm's in-house procedures. Almost half the
complaints it gets about 19,000 a year go direct to the Office, despite a rule that all
solicitors in England and Wales should have their own complaints procedures.
The Office is also to set a time limit; those dissatisfied with the
in-house procedure must, in most cases, approach the Office within six months.
The OSS expects to be out of action for 12 weeks, some 2,000 files
having been damaged at its Leamington Spa base during the Good Friday floods. On top of
that, it is struggling with both the increased number of complaints and a big backlog of
inspection work at firms.
In cases of inadequate professional service or shoddy work, the OSS
has the power to order a solicitor to pay compensation of up to £1,000; reduce a
solicitor's bill in whole or part, and require a solicitor to correct a mistake at his or
her own expense.
|In 1999 a local paper reports action, how
& what for, (*Link to) our observations
|In 2003 a victim of the practices seeks help to
CHALLENGE it all
The letter below in
HTML (for Links To & From)
was settled by Andrew of
*human-rights* for submissions to the Chief Executives of the Law Society and the OSS. It
was Andrew's intention to submit such challenges for two family members:
- 1. For Andrew's mother,
who was tricked and defrauded of her rights in law by the very solicitor who, decades
earlier, engaged in the USE and promotion, OF THE FORGERY we publish in our pages which
was generally released in March 2002. A false instrument
was created for use in the course of high court proceedings BY THE LEGAL CIRCLES, in
order to pervert and corrupt justice.
- Nothing unusual by, for and in the course of court
proceedings from within an alleged democratic state, one that allegedly rests and is
founded on law and order. [*Link to list of lovers of it all, alleged victim -
- FOUR SOLICITORS were involved in
the constructive frauds through use of FALSE INSTRUMENTS [including court orders lacking
accountability by the criminals who issued blank
cheques to be cashed against the assets of their victim].
- All engaged in the scams, as protected species, and the masterminds of CIUKU
Enterprises....... with the blessings of the police. Nothing unusual!
- 2. For Andrew's sister, who suffered the usual of indignities and impositions by the
licensed criminals, who benefit from practice certificates [issued by the Law
Society] and invariably merit special concessions to indulge in the free-for-all
that our courts entertain and create through and care of the occupants of judicial chairs.
to explicit challenges WHEN the instigators and users-promoters of the fraudulent
application of the courts facilities were CAUSED TO ABANDON THEIR PLANS for a targeted
irrelevant man, father, discarded husband].
|The letter was SETTLED FOR and posted BY:
Mr Len Miskulin
130 Hanson Drive
24 March 2003
The Law Society
The Chief Executive for the:
Office for the Supervision of Solicitors
8 Dormer Place
Your Ref:. CRO/23230-2001/KP2/KS1
Dear Sir / Madam
Re: Miskulin, Len COMPLAINT against Devgun Spencer
I beg to refer you to the above complaint
and the exchanges between your subordinates and myself.
The file should contain enough documented
evidence by way of stated 'indisputable facts, supported by actual events and non-events'.
The aforesaid realities establish dishonesty, deception and reckless misrepresentations by
the member of the Law Society, who relied and carried on relying on the staff and officers
below you in/at the Office for the Supervision of Solicitors, or should I say the Overlords Securing the Solicitors future?
I hereby demand that you set yourself the
task of forwarding to me and to my associate at Live Beat Dads Organisation by email and a
follow-up by mail to:
Mr. Len Miskulin
130 Hanson Drive
Loughton - Essex
a list of all documents in the file created
and maintained by the OSS for the complaint your 'set-up' received and the staff and
officers below you treated in the usual manner with plenty of delays, defaults and
omissions from and by allegedly legally trained / experienced persons.
I attach, hereto, printout of a declaration that I downloaded from the 'human-rights' Non
Governmental Organisation web-site. I demand that you duly complete and sign it in the
presence of a witness and return / post it, forthwith, to the above address. A scanned
image of same, should be transmitted by email, IF IT BE YOUR INTENTION TO MAINTAIN THE
MENTALITIES OF YOUR SUBORDINATES. Acting in contempt of statute and
evidence, as tutored pawns and bishops in the castle of the protection racket that was set
up and is maintained by the Law Society appears to be the simple strategy of the Overlords
Securing the Solicitors future. Promoting and selling to the naïve and gullible, albeit
the helpless and the abandoned victims of and by the legal circles, an allegedly
'professional body, allegedly looks into serious complaints about the Law Society's
members, in the order of the day. Nothing but blunt, arrogance and dishonesty because of
and through reliance on one another, BUT unacceptable practices from within an allegedly
civilised society with law and order as its foundation stones.
I beg to refer and DRAW
YOUR ATTENTION to a revealing news item, an article in a free
London weekly newspaper. Printout of the article, downloaded from the 'human-rights'
web-site, is attached hereto. I wonder if the article ever made the national papers and in
particular the serious broad-sheets. I demand that you set yourself the task of providing
to me the same service and consideration, for the necessitated appeal. It is notable that
in that other situation it was not a case of violated human rights as the causes and
reasons commanding an appeal, in my case. Evidently it was a case that was used as a
showpiece for consumption by the gullible in the area where the firm of solicitors
were/are operating. Need I add that it was also A CASE FOR ABUSE OF THE LEGAL AID FUNDS
FACILITY for a doomed case, 'precisely as the offending solicitor had advocated and
opined' / given his reasons for not acting as the aggrieved client had requested /
instructed the solicitor? Need I point to the fact that the 'offending' solicitor's
employers, the firm WAS TO BENEFIT BOTH FINANCIALLY (through blunt abuse of the Legal Aid
facility) and by way of 'favourable publicity' in the local press? (*F1)
The case referred to above clearly evinces
'POSITIVE DISCRIMINATION FOR THE PROTECTION OF THE FIRM OF SOLICITORS that employed the
offending (!) solicitor. The case also evinces the ever-present SUPPORT FOR THE PLUNDERING OF THE LEGAL AID FUNDS that are secured from
Central Government and administered by 'the managers of the Legal Aid Board' (defunct) who
were/are all too eager to lend their support to the plunderers of public funds. Need I to
point to the fact that the same wolves, pretending to be lambs, are now managing the Legal
Services Commission funds? Tax revenue for showcases, as in the Pinochet / Hoffman fiasco.
Reckless defaults and omissions as in most complaint cases and SHOWCASES INTENDED AND USED
AS PUBLIC RELATIONS EXERCISES by and for the promotion / protection of any firm of
solicitors and the Overlords for Securing the Solicitors future.
Copy of this letter is forwarded to the
Chief Executive, Mrs Janet Paraskeva, who circulated through the national press, in July
2001, the Law Society's 'promises and plan of action'. Another Public Relations exercise
about the errors, the mistakes, the defaults, the omissions and downright dishonesty and
deceptions by members, for which your subordinates have done and do their very best to
suppress and frustrate, to pervert the truth and to corrupt eventual 'pronouncements /
outcome'. Activities by and from legally trained persons, fully intending to 'aid and abet
the Law Society's licensed proteges' for the procurement of ever present false
representations leading to pecuniary advantages through and for
the securing of funds under false pretences.
ENCL. As text
cc. To other interested parties & Publication on the
above letter points to the fact that legally trained professionals
ACT IN CONTEMPT OF THE LAW. Our views as to their activities and contempt of the law were
also stated in the work of, a book by Dr. A Adoko. He contacted Andrew in February 1999 in
respect of the very issues BUT within days he was changing colours and engaged in
questionable invitations. Details are now (as of March 2005) released in an explicit page. (*Link to a relevant
passage from Dr. A. Adoko's book whereby his conclusions and statements arising out of his
experiences with the Law Society and the OSS concur with those of Mr Andrew Yiannides, the
founder of Human-Rights.Org, views 25 years earlier).
*Link to the images of a letter Mr Miskulin received a year earlier from the OSS. Access from there the page you can link to from the
explicit submissions to the Family Registry. The very submissions did cause the abusers (as
other challenges published in the referred to page did) to send the case back
to the High Court. There Mr Justice Charles, for obvious reasons, did not seat on the case
to deal with the challenges BUT Mr. Justice Singer, who was involved in the pre-arranged
theatrical productions in the Foenander -v- Foenander case (for the
premeditated 'constructive frauds on the taxpayers' *Link
to stated facts) was all to happy to engage afresh in the usual denial of
rights to due process and fraud aplenty. (NOTE, please that Mr Miskulin
published at www.lbduk.org the events of the day when
Mr Justice Singer exhibited his usual attitude to the rule of law and 'due process' in
|By 2004 the family closet was bursting
and the Law Society was reporting...
July more news 2004
Below the article in HTML for links to & from.
Tuesday July 6, 2004
Law Society could lose power
as report condemns failures
The Law Society risks losing its powers to regulate solicitors as a
report out today reveals it has failed to meet all but one of six government targets for
dealing with complaints against the profession.
The Society's performance on key targets is worse than its record the
previous year, says the Legal Services Ombudsman, the watchdog overseeing its complaints
The Ombudsman, Zahida Manzoor, was satisfied with the Society's
handling of complaints in only 53.3% of the cases brought to her from April 2003 to March
2004, down from 67.2% the previous year and was well short of the 75% target set by the
Department of Constitutional Affairs.
The latest figures come despite an all-out effort by the professional
body for solicitors in England and Wales to fend off government threats to strip its power
to regulate the profession. Critics ask whether it can regulate and represent the
profession at the same time.
The public's complaints included protests about delays in making wills
and winding up estates, failure to keep them informed about the progress of conveyancing
and that their solicitors were acting at the same time for other clients with conflicting
interests. There were also criticisms that the solicitors were overcharging and failing to
spell out how much a case might cost from the start.
Those grievances were compounded by the society's failings once
complaints about its members had been brought.
The report cites Dr. B who sued the solicitor who represented him in a
personal injury claim for negligence. He won compensation but his complaint to the society
over the solicitor's poor service took three and a half years. Just as a decision loomed
the solicitor was struck off for professional misconduct in another case.
Today's report will make it more likely that Sir David Clementi, the
Prudential chairman chosen by the government to review the regulation of legal services,
will recommend an independent body to take over the role when he delivers his report at
the end of the year.
Against a goal of 60% of cases to be closed within three months, the
society achieved 46.7% compared with 52.9% the previous year. It closed only 67.5% of
cases within six months against a 75% target.
The only turnaround target met was to close 85% of cases in a year. It
Another indicator is a rise in ex-gratia payouts volunteered by the
society where it accepts its complaints handling has been faulty. In the first quarter of
2004 these totalled £165,864 compared with £28,414 in the first quarter of 2003.
Ms Manzoor has told Sir David she thinks the society should lose its
complaints role. She supports an overreaching independent regulator of legal services with
an independent complaints body reporting to it, leaving the society to deal with serious
Last year after several warnings the government activated the Access to
Justice Act 1999 to appoint a Legal Services Complaints Commission with power to set
targets and fine the society up to £5m, if it fails to meet them. Ms Manzoor, who
combines that post with her ombudsman role, expects to set new targets soon.
After reviewing more than 2,000 complaints personally she identified
the main failings of solicitors as excessive delays, excessive costs, poor responsiveness
to communication, failing to act in the clients best interest, failing to clarify the
implications of actions, bad communications.
The society's chief executive, Janet Paraskeva, said, "Over the
past 12 months the Law Society has resolved over 1,500 more cases than we have received,
Fifty per cent of cases are dealt with within three months and 70% within six
(C) The Guardian 2004 - UK
- We relate below the foundations upon which the arrogant abusers of public office
have been creating and expanding their type of societies in our allegedly civilised
democracy, one that allegedly rests and is founded on principles of law and order.
- A typical example of 'the reliable bricks and mortar they use can be recognised
in the activities and the performance of an alleged victim-challenger, Mr. Maurice Kellett
and his affiliates / associates. (*F3)
- His false assertions and proclamations, about his alleged expertise on the
Freemasons, amount to nothing short of PROMOTION OF THE POWERS THAT BE, as his postings in
newsgroups establish without any doubt.
- As part of a group of similarly engaging 'experts' on promoting the powers of
the Freemasons, they promote one another and the sum total of their contributions towards
their alleged challenges in newsgroups, also in permanent web-pages on the Internet,
simply amount to nothing short of: - "Do not do as I did,
for they will do to you what they did to me".
- The facts and the realities we point to, below, are but a typical example of the
type of person upon whom the criminals, who organise, manage and control the lives of 'the
serfs' = *the sons of men of planet earth*, rely to carry on as they have been for
centuries / millennia.
- The arrogant dreamer, Mr Maurice Kellett, had been pointed by Mr Andrew
Yiannides, to the extract in the 'Old Testament' to which we have been pointing our
visitors, since January 2000 (*new visitors
can link from here to the extract) and he was one of the first three craft-y ones to have
benefited from the information we imparted to them pointing to the connection of the
Freemasons to the most vile of fraudulent promotions to mankind for over 2300 years, the
Old Testament (*F4). Typical of all fraudsters who misrepresent themselves as
alleged victim-challengers WHILE OPERATING AS THE FRONT LINE SOLDIERS WHO ARE HOLDING THE
FORT FOR THE ABUSERS OF TRUST & PUBLIC OFFICE, Freemasons or not.
- We released on 3rd March 2008, a House of Lords ruling / precedent case dating
back to 1940 whereby their Lordships addressed and deliberated upon the very elements that
apply to the performance and behaviour of all the fraudsters-club recruits (*link from here to the page
where we qualify how we arrived at the term for such evil persons) we name and expose in our pages
[*Link from here to FOOTNOTE below] had been and was published, on the
Internet, by Mr Maurice Kellett, a victim(!) who also joined the
human-rights.org Community On Line, as subsequently transpired, for other purposes than 'OUR AIMS' qualify. Another web-site (jiwalu.demon.co.uk) which he set-up and had been
maintaining was in place long before he joined the Community On Line. His vociferous
proclamations and his failures to support his assertions / allegations (about the
Freemasons) with any evidence, most certainly amounted to childish 'scenarios intended
only for subliminal indoctrination of the readers of his output'. Indeed such was the
situation with a number of other allegedly concerned 'citizens' and products of The
Organised FRAUD IMPOSED ON THE SERFS & CORRUPTION OF MORONS OF HIS APTITUDE /
MENTALITY, through Public Servants & in particular the Law Enforcement Agencies. [*Link from here to
a blunt FORGERY that was created and introduced by solicitors & barristers
attached to and born of a Claim for Fraudulent Misrepresentations in commercial business.
The forgery was simply intended for use to cause the plaintiff, the victim of fraud, to
abandon his claim against the defendants, and, as transpired it was used / promoted to the
plaintiff, by the solicitor, Mr Kypros Nicola of Nicolas & Co. London N4. for arrogant
corruption and perversion of Justice. Needless to say, it was all entertained / ignored by
the police & judicial chair occupants, all the way to the Court of Appeal. Nothing
unusual, simply PART & PARCEL OF THE FACILITIES USED AT & BY THE COURTS in an
allegedly civilised state, one that is sold to the misinformed and ill-educated 'serfs' in
an allegedly civilised Democracy, one that allegedly is founded and rests on principles of
law and order].
He, Mr. Maurice Kellett, was asked on
numerous occasions, over the years, to place links (bookmarks / anchor
points) to the relevant part which we subsequently published
in our pages and this page. Conveniently and under various pretexts Mr Kellett had been
defaulting to act as requested for years. Visitors will be afforded opportunities to read
of arrogant falsehoods in respect of 'his alleged membership of the Community on Line' and
the liberties he indulged in without reference to the founder & without any
authorisation to act as he did WHILE ACTING IN CONTEMPT OF THE PRINCIPLES he endorsed when
he joined the Community. (*Link to OUR AIMS).
The non-existent co-operation from and by
'a victim'(?) must be compared with the arrangements covered in the text from the
published work, based on research by the late Stephen Knight, [*Link to FOOTNOTE below].
The CoL member had not been in touch for
well over two years when he contacted us with tongue in cheek arrogance for which he
received an appropriate reply; in due course it will be made public* [*Link from here
to the RELEASED material].
He appeared to have gone underground following 'eviction from his home', one of the
properties that 'conveniently' was converted to legal costs, through the usual abuse of
the legal system, care of the manipulators of it all. Conscious of the constructive
frauds, and participating in the 'enforcement of the theft of properties through abuse of
the courts' facilities', the police, as always. [*Link to another example when THREE
PROPERTIES WERE CONVERTED TO LEGAL COSTS and the victim, just happy to benefit from
assistance for the reward under the table to persons who cannot possibly claim to have
been, be blackmailed into acceptance of the parts pre-scripted for them to play as alleged
victims, which is what such persons engage in thereafter].
The criminal indulgences and activities
care of the Law Enforcement Agencies and the abusers of public office, are the main bone
of contention that we, and the citizens, ARE & WILL BE pointing to our representatives
in government, directly and through our and other on Line pages, published by victims and
members of the co-operating Community of CHALLENGERS WHO USE THEIR RIGHTS - AS ASSURED IN
A typical example of how we
addressed, in April 2003, a Member of Parliament (the Rt. Hon. Frank Field, ex Minister) can be accessed in our pages. [*Link to the material facts covered in the
letter that caused the Home Secretary to write of his position as an elected Member of
Access, also, a typical example of
how 'victims'(!) simply promote relentlessly the powers of the criminals who are in
control, WHILE DEFAULTING TO CO-OPERATE [*Link to another typical example] & WORK WITH OTHERS, TO ANY AGENDA, FOR A
COMMON GOAL (as the abusive Public(!)
SERVANTS(?) do). Link directly
to the page/part or copy the URL below for posting on to others who may have been victims
of the legal circles and Public(!) Servants(?).
- The text from 'The
Access the material in the
above page and consider all the implications that arise in and through the presentation of
the events we describe / cover in the left margin/pane where the link (from this page) takes you. Then consider the material facts
that are covered and pointed to through the EXPLICIT ADDENDA that can be accessed in our
updated pages file.
Who but the 'crafty'
and conniving 'fraudsters club recruits' responsible
FOR THE PERPETUATION OF THE SYSTEM OF OPERATIONS IN PLACE FOR MILLENNIA? Consider this and the question below with
the material both link to and THEN recognise the element of "Subliminal
Indoctrination Tactics & ploys through alleged victims and or 'sold to the system as
is idiots' who fail to recognise the issue of 'Accessories & Abettors to the
Constructive Frauds Through the Courts', that all visitors can read of and how, by using
the link from this paragraph to our exclusive page. (NOTE: Each and every one of the persons we list and name as 'fraudsters club
recruits', are persons who claim to be legal gurus and have been through the motions, all
the way to the reward under the table. Others whom we name and list as charlatans and
stooges are persons who work with the fraudsters club recruits (and the legal circles) in and FOR the promotion of the
system as is. All share a common factor: THEY ADAMANTLY REFUSED & FAILED TO ADDRESS
THE ISSUES COVERED IN THE EXCLUSIVE PAGE that visitors to our pages can access from here too)
Who but the very
'victims'(?) responsible for 'the subjugation of the masses through THEIR relentless
promotion of 'the powers(!) of THE CRIMINALS they know of and yet they simply indulge in
the perpetual promotions of the scenarios covered / stated in our pages? [*Link]
DO read the words
attributed to the great teacher Jesus Christ as stated by / covered in St. Luke's Gospel,
that we publish in our Quotes Page.
|The images below exhibit reckless records
by a solicitor accused for letting down his client; and the professional body licensing
such persons treating the deceived client with utter disregard.
- We were meant to receive copies of the replies from
the OSS & the Law Society.
- Mr Miskulin was to arrange for the friend who was
present when Ms Lee, the CAFCASS officer visited Mr Miskulin at his residence was to
attend to his mail but we never received the copies.
- Since Mr. Miskulin left for his country of origin
we received only an email simply informing us that he reached safe and was looking for a
- We later heard of friends visiting him in Croatia
but we never merited any other contact or information in respect of his 'new life' back in
the old country.
- We simply published thereafter the facts and the
realities in the page /len.htm and the facts attached to how contact
was made with us initially; also how certain developments spoke louder than assertions and
promotions as to intentions. [*Link to the stated early contact / developments]
|*Link from here to the page where we
published challenges submitted to & lodged with the court by Mr Miskulin, as settled
extract below is from 'The Brotherhood'
Researched work by Stephen Knight.
....."I asked how this action might be
`Solicitors are very good at it said Christopher. Get your man involved in
something legal - it need not be serious - and you have him'. Solicitors
I was told, are `past masters' at causing endless
delays, generating useless paperwork, ignoring instructions, running immense bills and
misleading clients into taking decisions damaging to themselves. Masonic police can harass, arrest on false charges, and plant evidence. 'A
businessman in a small community or person in public office arrested for dealing in child
pornography, for indecent exposure, or for trafficking in drugs, is at the end of the
line', said Christopher. `He will never work again. Some people have committed suicide
after experiences of that kind'. [*Link from here to a perfect example of the criminal
activities the Legal circles and the Police engage in, in an allegedly civilised democracy).
Masons can bring about the situation where
credit companies and banks withdraw credit facilities from individual clients and
tradesmen, said my informant. Banks can foreclose. People who rely on the telephone for
their work can be cut off for long periods. Masonic employees of local
authorities can arrange for a person's drains to be inspected, and extensive damage to be
reported, thus burdening the person with huge repair bills; workmen carrying out the job
can 'find' in reality cause - further damage. Again with regard to legal matters a fair
hearing is hard to get when a man in ordinary circumstances is in financial difficulties.
If he is trying to fight a group of unprincipled Freemasons skilled in using the 'network'
it will be impossible because Masonic Department of Health and Social Security and Law
Society officials can delay applications for Legal Aid endlessly. /end of extract. [For the root to it all we invite victims, readers
and researchers to access the page where we expose the biggest fraud on the sons of
men, ongoing as of the 3rd Century BC *Link]
NOTE: The above extract
(from 'The Brotherhood) is included in this page for the simple reason that many of the
victims who contacted us over the years 1995-2004 had been directed / pointed to us by the
great puke production machine, one James Todd, of VOMIT (Victims of Masonic Ill Treatment)
repute. His psychosis and relentless promotions without so much as an element of EVIDENCE
in support of his promotions were recognised as nothing but Subliminal Indoctrination of
those who accept his representations without any proof. Among the many we had contact
with, over the years, there were two we worked closely with and supported their work
towards exposure of the rampant fraud and corruption of society, *we emphasise
corruption of society* through the courts and the Law Enforcement Agencies,
in general. We hasten to add that the co-operation was a case of one way traffic only, as
happens when arrogantly selfish individuals OR EVIL PERSONS who are acting to an agenda of
their own or as lovers of that which they complain of and about is their spring board. The
two plus James Todd and one Nicholas Stamoulakatos, all four very vociferous Free Mason
bashers, received information and EVIDENCE that connects the brotherhood to the vilest
work ever to be presented to humans (thinkers) and ALL were pointed out to the issue of
intellectual property and the law on copyright. All were told not to use the information
without reference to source and credit to the work / research by the founder of
human-rights, Mr Andrew Yiannides. Needles to say they crawled back in the sand as perfect
specimens of the proverbial ostrich. Evidently what they decline to read or look at, does
not exist! Of such persons, the bricks and mortar the castles are built by the criminals
who are in control of pseudo-democracies. All arranged through the type of facilities that
convert 'conditioned illiterates in law' to lovers of the fraud on the taxpayers, as
covered in our exclusive page ALL TAXPAYERS should access and point others to its content
also. [*Link from here to the arrangements in
place that convert 'conditioned' victims of the legal circles and the courts to lovers of
the rampant fraud on and corruption of society]
1. The Press
Barons and the Intellectual Prostitutes they retain, sure know how to
serve and promote CIUKU Enterprises, as organised, managed and controlled through the
thoroughly corrupted Legal System and the courts. In the case stated above (letters to the
Chief Executive Officers of both the Law Society and its clone, the O.S.S = Office
Securing the Solicitors future) the Public(!) Servants(?) at and from within the Legal Aid
/ Legal Services Commission, party to the assaults on targeted assets and abuse of the
Legal Aid Certificates for legal assistance to used & created fraudsters. Public
office abused for constructive fraud on targeted assets and citizens as we cover in our
pages & as careful analysis of the SCENARIOS FOR PROMOTION of the legal system,
without so much as a hint about the plundering of the Budget funds, recklessly. [*Link from here to the foundations for the 'plundering of the
national budget' opinion. Concerned / interested citizens, should access from here & consider the simple fact that the root of it
all goes back to the times when the editors / creators of the New Testament recorded words
to the lawyers of those days, which words they attributed to Jesus Christ as of His days].
2. Visitors can *link from here to a web-site where they can read of arrogant denials of rights, and the
creation of the usual constructive frauds through abuse of the courts
facilities FOR BLUNT THEFT OF PROPERTIES. It goes without saying that
OBSTRUCTING JUSTICE (appeals warranted as a result of the arrogant abuse of judicial chair
occupation) WAS / IS BUT THE KISS OF DEATH
& constitutes a criminal offence [*Link to a challenge
made of European Court of Appeal staff who engage(d) in such activities]. Visitors,
readers, researchers are reminded that *rights assured in law*, are indeed treated as
properties under the law. Visitors will be reading of the tribulations of a family
that was targeted by abusers of public office who, not surprisingly, declined the
invitation to endorse and forward, to their victims, the explicit DECLARATION that
specifically covers the type of criminal, in intent, activities ongoing in the courts. Citizens
who are faced with such evil activities, when they seek justice (in UK courts and in
the courts in other pseudo-democracies, that we know of) can download and use the form
in order to challenge any public servant who fails to exercise his or her public
duties within the law and the terms of their appointment to public office. It should
be clear to all readers, who visit our pages, that public servants who fail to commit
themselves to the stipulated areas the form provides / covers, they elect to comply with
the request / demand and default because they recognise the simple fact that they were/are
not acting within the law. Their failures, therefore, point to an indirect admission
that they knew they were/are ACTING ILLEGALLY or IN CONTEMPT OF THE LAW and in contempt of
the rights of the citizens to benefit from true information, of which the citizens are
assured in law, yet obstructed and denied, to the citizens, by the administrators of the
law and public services.
3. We had to create a page where we
released email exchanges with Mr Maurice Kellet. We acted after he had established for the
umpteenth time, over a number of years and in the most obvious of evil ways, his position
as a convert-to and as a lover of the FACILITIES IN PLACE FOR CORRUPTION OF MORONS &
MALIGNED OF HIS MENTALITY. Our patience with such persons had been worn very thin and such
abusers HAD TO BE EXPOSED for their parts in promoting and expanding 'the method of
operations' which we cover in an exclusive page, which page NOT ONE OF THE FRAUDSTERS WE
NAME & EXPOSE, EVER BOTHERED TO CONCERN THEMSELVES WITH THE REALITIES WE COVER ^ POINT
TO IN THE PAGE. Readers and researchers need to take on board the fact that the only
objective of persons we name and expose, is to suck-in, to cause or to have victims of the
legal circles, of the courts, of the police and of public servants to be drawn or to be
sent to them (by the ill-informed and by other lovers & promoters of the system of
operation) IN ORDER TO USE & COERCE NEW VICTIMS TO GO FOR THE REWARDS AT THE END OF
THE LINE, AS STIPULATED (and we clarify in our pages) BY THE CREATORS & MANAGERS OF
THE ORGANISED CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY, THE TAXPAYERS, IN OUR PSEUDODEMOCRACY. *Link from here to the page where we released the email exchanges with
Mr. M. Kellett, the fraud of an alleged human (thinker); read and recognise why we
released in 2008 email exchanges -years earlier- with the same charlatan after challenging
his evil ways to which we pointed him in the email exchanges which we used in order to
create the specific page, in the first instance. Visitors must consider the challenges
to the dancing partners of Mr. Maurice Kellett, the Freemasons who published something
about him and our very page after visiting it, and misrepresenting it in their web-page as
part of his well-known diatribe..... indicating thus that persons (other Freemasons) who
read their contributions / comments about the page need not bother to access Mr. Kellett's
usual trash...... hence our challenge at the top of the page to the Freemasons to use any
grey-matter they may have gifted them with, by their creator, the alleged creator of all
4. *Link from here to the page where we publish the evidence
connecting the Freemasons to the plans of the creators of the alleged creator of all and
everything. In the page also we relate and publish evidence attached to a specific
scenario that exposes a group of organised Freemasons who acted in contempt of communities
they allegedly were representing as Christian Orthodox Hellenes (Greeks). Yet they abused
the trust placed in them and they indulged / acted as Freemasons and not as the other
states they allegedly were representing (those who sent them along for) as their
representatives and as delegates to the convention.