h-rtitle.gif (7604 bytes)

Crime - Organised - Institutionalised - Corruption - Fraud - Protection Rackets, run and managed by judicial chair occupants, in a free-for-all state of abundance. Note below the arrangements between the administrative, the judiciary and the media; read of the all-embracing guarantee in place, in contempt of all law : the root shall be pointed to.

WHERE IS JUSTICE? Read below:-

"The court has inherent jurisdiction to stay an action which must fail; as, for instance an action brought in respect of an act of State"

*Link from here to founder's tribulations in 1972-75 and marvel at the creativity of allegedly honourable officers of Justice and the Law in the mother of all PSEUDOdemocracies

  • And by extension any act of any public servant who is appointed, retained and maintained by other public servants for all of whom, the state, as employer, is ultimately responsible, including abusers of judicial chair occupancy. Hence, the billions paid out as covered in the affidavit which visitors can link to directly from here [*Link].
  • Link also from here to the founder's conclusions as of 1972-75 when the great Metropolitan police were seen to be nothing but accessories to and abettors of the rampant fraud and corruption through the courts organised and processed to fruition while Members of Parliament were -as they still do- promoting the waffle that amounts to nothing short of:-

'independence of the judiciary to act in contempt of ALL LAW (national and international) in a pseudo-democracy.

*Link from here to proof of the parts the police play in promotion and expansion of the criminal activities instigated, processed and imposed on society by the legal circles. Read of assertions by a typical hypocrite, none other than the Commissioner of the Metropolitan Police, Sir Robert Mark QPM, when he spoke of FALSE RECORDS / FORGERIES by the legal circles while delivering his famous Dimbleby Lecture on BBC-TV in November 1973, 15 months after he received true copy of THE FORGERY advanced and promoted by the licensed criminals : solicitors and barristers for their evil ends in the case that opened Andrew Yiannides' mental eyes to the realities of life in the United Kingdom, a typical PSEUDOdemocracy. Can anyone enlighten Andrew and the millions of victims of the legal circles WHY NO PROSECUTION of the solicitors & the barristers in 1972 or thereafter?.

  • With such a facility in place (the words we point to above) and arrogant abuse of public office, can anyone assert, or argue, that Mr Andrew Yiannides, the founder of human-rights, was not right to determine that Justice has been abducted and that she is held captive in the dungeons maintained by her abductors who rape her daily in their courts? (>Hence the c reation of www.jusaticeraped.org <)
  • ALL Member States of the European Union are subject to the ruling which visitors, readers and researchers can access in the explicit page /yourrights.htm

*Link from here to the realities - in due course also a link to the warning (indirect but nonetheless very clear) for thinkers to recognise 

  • On 3rd March 2008 >someone's birthday< we released a House of Lords PRECEDENT CASE and reveal deliberations by their Lordships in respect of FRAUD - DECEPTION - CONSPIRACY & IMPLIED LIES BY KEEPING SILENT about any wrong imposed on any other.
  • >>> IN THE MEANTIME we have been naming and shaming a number who know of and engage in much more than just approve wrongs imposed on Mr & Mrs Average, the millions of taxpayers, in our allegedly civilised country / state / province / district of the European Union created by politicians, without reference to the taxed for fraud sucker-serfs, allegedly for the benefit of the citizens from FRAUD & CORRUPTION, among other promotions.

Needless to say the case entailed activities and practices by solicitors as Mr Andrew Yiannides was subjected to, decades later, by an old school friend, Mr Kypros Nichola of Nicholas & Co. in London. Mr K. Nichola bluntly abused the trust placed in him and indulged, in tandem with others, in criminal activities intended to cause the damages that were imposed on the targeted 'serf' by accredited - by the Law Society & Bar Council - allegedly Honourable Officers of the Supreme Court, the courts maintained by successive elected governments in the United Kingdom, one of many pseudodemocracies. In due course another revelation relevant to the arrogant 'inherent jurisdiction', through which to deny, obstruct justice & impose all manner of criminally created states on 'the serfs', who are taxed for the cost of maintaining criminals in public office, in pseudo-democracies.

RESPONSIBLE FOR THE STATE OF AFFAIRS, successive irresponsible Lord Chancellors and Home Secretaries who ignored and ignore all complaints and submissions by victims of the organised crimes we point to and expose in our pages, irrespective of the evidence and the law pointed to, by the victims of it all, the citizens who are called upon to pay taxes for the maintenance of criminals in public office.

[*Link from here to our exclusive page, covering confidential fraud as arranged THROUGH THE BEST KEPT OPEN SECRET in alleged democracies, European States. Elsewhere the foundations and corner stone upon which the operatives built the societies of their making using the bricks and mortar we cover in this and other pages. The visitor should not be under any illusion that the stars in the theatrical productions, covered in our pages were by any stretch of the imagination 'humans' who were / are gifted with any attributes that distinguish 'true humans' (>thinkers<) from animals.

Fraud in court  Council staff use Forgeries   Misconduct in Public Office. 2 cases relative to applicable law One Protocol says it ALL It betrays arrogant intentions Law Provides for THEFTS and it covers Judges too Judges' duties   TIME 4 CHANGE   & CHALLENGES Site CONTENTS - Table of Contents & ongoing work Your Rights & OBLIGATIONS to Society SITE SEARCH facility for any specific element / issue of concern to visitors / readers
COURTS : their Facilities Abused For ORGANISED CRIME : FRAUD Solicitor's Perjury & Victim Ignores it all Just like the Law Society always does Blackmailed or is it Just Conditioned & Subjugated Victims who join the club ? We name Lovers of blunt fraud through courts - Users of the facilities 4 illicit gains Local Authorities & FRAUD on 'serfs' the Taxpayers who are kept in the dark Police Party to & Endorsing Criminal Acts, Activities Arrogant Fraud FALSE Records & Contempt of Law by the legal Circles & Public Services The crafty ones & Vexatious Litigant PLOYS for the rewarded silent

* Information FOR victims who wish to co-operate by EXPOSING & CHALLENGING abusers of Public Office *

family.uk-human-rights justiceraped.org dssfraud.htm confraud.htm dadscare.htm contract.htm converts.htm MensAid
solicitorsfromhell.co.uk chancellor.htm theyknow.htm solfraud.htm sheknows.htm 4deceit.htm convicti.htm forward.htm


*Link from here to evidence. *Link also from here to a case when the abusers of the courts' facilities abandoned their plans for another targeted family

IMPORTANT INFORMATION for all victims of malpractice - misconduct - negligence, etc. TO NOTE

In the civil justice system in England and Wales, a judge presides over the proceedings that are argued by the opposing sides through the adversarial process. The process enables the court, judge, to reach a conclusion as to the truth of the facts in dispute. Thereat it is for the judge to apply the law to the facts proven, established at court.

The system as evolved is covered in the page 'English Legal System' and remains the same after the Woolf reforms.

An explicit Affidavit [*L] plus exhibits and
     letters to a Chief Inspector of Police
          one to solicitors
[*L] and another to the Lord Chancellor [*L] evince
               ORGANISED CRIMES
(Access and read the letter to the police in September 2006 [*L])

Access & read from one of a number of letters to the Prime Minister : * I believe that New Labour will deliver us from the wrongs we have been suffering for far too long. Use of our resources in terms of human potential and capabilities can and should be channelled through rights not wrongs, through positives not through negatives. It is our produce and ingenuity we can sell to others not the minefields of corrupt and bankrupt public services. * [*Link from here to the page, note the steps taken to ensure the Prime Minister forwarded / delegated submissions and evidence received at 10 Downing Street to the right Minister / Ministry because the submissions were in respect of ORGANISED CRIMES

3rd March 2011 added link [*L] to the BBC-TV Dimbleby Lecture in 1973 as the Metropolitan Police Commissioner, Sir Robert Mark prepared & presented to the sucker-serfs


oss.htm                    KEY Page Changes 4 Feb. 2007

O.S.S & O.L.S.O *Created February 1997*
hrbnrsml.gif (1162 bytes)JOIN

a Network / Community On Line and work with others for the Common Good & a Better World.
Challenge & Expose
Fraud & Corruption

Publish your Statement of Facts and the Evidence you have. Use your rights in law (link) and ACT with others against the offenders. Join in a class action.

Affiliated Sites For The Above Projected Action   lbduk.org (read page first)
Must Sites - List

Citizens complain and the Internal Protection racket is set in motion. Deception, lies and false assertions amounting to misrepresentation abound. Read the last paragraph in the article below and consider the responses you received as a victim of both solicitors and the protection racketeers sold as THE OFFICE for the Supervision of Solicitors.
ossfraud.jpg (38555 bytes)
Link to OCR text in the main panel to the right.

More Paper Exercises and dust in your eyes? Will the agents of citizens, the MPs and government in a 'democratic(?) state act as Thomas Jefferson and his government did? OR will the government in waiting ACT as Promised in 1995, after acknowledging THE FRAUD IN (and through) the LEGAL SYSTEM ?

The introduction from OLSO loud and clear... olsop1s.jpg (55993 bytes)
The government's expectations also loud and clear ... and in line with the  undertakings in 1995; the promises by and from the government in waiting. 
olsop2s.jpg (47642 bytes)

The OSS - grinds to a halt, the Law Society in a mess and the complaints go on rising at the rate of 380 per week.   The latest statistics point to 1 complaint for every 2.4 solicitors, a mere 42% ! Could any industry survive a 42% returns rate?
ossclosr.jpg (76273 bytes)

The OSS was called to investigate the case we publish below.  The 'Advertiser' is a local free paper and the scanned image below is from the Haringey issue of 20th October 1999.
solfiner.jpg (67159 bytes)
We will appreciate information if the news item made the national papers and in particular the broad-sheets

The legal circles use a FORGERY in attempts to cause a victim of fraud to abandon his legal action against the criminals who indulged.
forgeryr.jpg (67076 bytes)
All were relying on High Court judges to ignore the law applicable & to impose through FALSE INSTRUMENTS of their own creation legal costs for the pleasure of being denied rights to protection under the laws of Parliament. And the police / Law Society as indifferent to the activities as any follower of the teachings by examples stated in the most vile of works ever to have been arrogantly misrepresented to the naive and gullible who were/are sold false states allegedly resting and founded on principles of law & Order 
KEY to Page and Site
2. Letters TO
3. Letters FROM
1. OLSO Report 1999 P1
2. OLSO Report 1999 P2
3. Complaints PILE-UP/Ignored?
4. Solicitor FINED? WOW but..
Page CHANGES/Additions
1. Added Letter to OSS & LS
2. Links >letter< To  OSS
3. Text from The Brotherhood
Letters TO - List
1. Law Society & OSS C.E.O.
Rt. Hon. Frank Field MP
3. The Prime Minister Dec.99
Letters FROM - List
1. MP to Lord Chancellor 95
2. Lord Irvine to MP 1999
Papers Other ARTICLES
1. Complaints Inundate OSS
Solicitor FINED but read of.
3. The Times May 6th 1998
60mlafr1.jpg (84384 bytes)
alaf4agf.jpg (404661 bytes)

We add that one of the solicitors mentioned in the article is to feature in explicit challenges of and to the Law Society, the licensee of criminals who destroy families as covered in the page /internco.htm


The letter below to the very solicitors who determined that the taxpayers should reward their client for the evil activities of the legal circles and the courts. [*Link to their letter]

antsolcr.jpg (63401 bytes)

The above letter points to improprieties by two firms of solicitors. We refer visitors, readers & researchers to the letter from the Legal Aid Board we published in the public domain years ago. In the meantime many the fraudsters club recruits who shoved their heads in the sand & ignored the element of WHY the Legal Aid Board were caused to abandon their demands of the victim whose rights in law and assets the solicitors targeted. All ignored the fact that 'the serf' had issued a Default Summons and that it had been served in respect of rents owing; the issues are covered in the above letter. It is dedicated to all abusers of office at and within the Law Society and its clone, the OSS, also to staff and officers of the Legal Aid Board, the skin of which changed and was renamed Legal Services Commission.


Fat Cats - Plunderers lafatcat.jpg (64750 bytes)
Visitors, readers and researchers can link to the Lord Chancellor's submissions to the Home Affairs Select Committee in November 1999.


undercon.gif (286 bytes) Page Revised: August 10, 2012  *Links 1. from 'Corrupt Courts' practices, 2. To 'For Suckers To Awake' on principles of relevant Law3. Added material to our submissions in respect of news article - Laws Society activities & Press Releases - below
Site under reconstruction for better navigation and incorporation of additional material and updates

VISITORS ARE URGED to access and READ THE IMPORTANT update and ADDENDA we were obliged to introduce in January 2002. We had no choice but to REPORT THE CRIMES TO THE TREASURY; our observations and knowledge of the constructive frauds made us accessories if we kept quiet, like the alleged victims who work towards the implementation of the schemes by the abductors and rapists of Justice, the Goddess.  You will find the addenda statement at the top of the Updated Pages File where it was first published. We are sure that you will share with us our concerns and most profound disappointment at and with persons who adopt and promote activities which they know are nothing but downright crimes. We draw your attention to our exclusive page where we expose (as conscientious law abiding citizens) the Confidentiality Between Fraudsters that exists care of the BEST OPEN SECRET. 

Guidelines on Navigating through the extensive material: access instructions.  

As part of the reconstruction process our new pages and pages where changes and additions have been implemented, the improved / amended pages are endorsed with the link 'Page Changes and the date of the last changes. The link takes visitors to a List of the changes implemented in the page. These include new material and links from relevant paragraphs to other or new relevant material in other pages. For further clarification email: webmaster@

Office for the Supervision of Solicitors

The Office of the Legal Services Ombudsman in its annual report for the year 1998/99 was 'encouraging'.  We simply drew attention to the obvious which we publish below. No further comment from the victims of the 'system' is warranted for the Ombudsman acted as responsibly and as sensitively as the situation commanded. Drawing attention to the fact that the OSS and the Law Society have not pulled their socks up and that they failed to heed the warnings and advice from OLSO suffice.

In the previous year's report the 'advise' from OLSO was  "...in the absence of any significant and tangible results by the end of 1998, the OSS' promises of to-day could become tomorrow's EMPTY rhetoric. I also warned that, unless solicitors themselves shouldered the responsibility for effective complaints handling, the OSS ran the risk of being overwhelmed by the SHEER VOLUME OF COMPLAINTS with which it was dealing. It gives me no satisfaction to report that my warning message has gone unheeded and my prediction has become reality".

"The Government has made it abundantly clear that it expects the legal profession to operate its complaints - handling systems in the public interest and in a way that inspires public confidence".

The expectations may well be too much for a bankrupt organisation. As we understand it the Solicitors Indemnity Fund has been in the red for decades (*Link to letter from the DTI). Its members should either guarantee its liabilities (if not trading under a guarantee) or cease expecting public servants, in judicial chairs, to entertain the constructive frauds they indulge in systematically at the expense of the public. The latter should bring the message home through instructions from the government that 'fraud in the legal system' will no longer be tolerated and that the police and home office WILL ACT in matters that rest on and breach criminal code; any criminal activity must be prosecuted; that should put an end to the tribulations of the much tested public and the OSS will have less complaints. The government HAS TO BE SEEN TO BE ACTING as  promised to Mr. Andrew Yiannides in 1995, when in opposition. [*Link to the exclusive letter]

NO NEED TO COMMENT. The pile up of the odd 25,000 complaints to which the 380 additions every week speaks loudly. Any decent manager should be able to work  out how many new members of staff are needed.  Naturally all staff must be ready willing AND ABLE TO DEAL WITH the issues of each complaint AS OPPOSED TO looking for excuses through which to delay and protract; solicitors themselves must be prepared to shoulder responsibility for mistakes and deal with such. The inherent mentality of "...lets create more work  for the legal professions and the courts.."  HAS TO CEASE if the public is ever likely to have ANY confidence in the legal professions, let alone the court services.  When a solicitor admits the practice of  ".... reward by paper weight, not quality or service... "© as our founder wrote of in 1975,  the system and public servants who entertain the practices and even instigate such activities need proper supervision by laymen who are familiar with 'the system' and are TRULY INDEPENDENT OF IT.

Intriguing news. The Law Society and the OSS acted against an offending solicitor. Very interesting is the fact that the persons who complained to the Law Society were solicitors themselves. Solicitors, evidently, HAVE RIGHTS unlike ordinary citizens who complain about much more serious issues than failures to appeal. The citizens are milked dry daily as the proverbial cow; they are abandoned by the lawyers who deceive and cheat them through criminal activities that are entertained and endorsed by our Law Enforcement Agencies, as the cases we report and cover in our pages establish. Clear and indisputable criminal activities indulged into in the Geoffrey Harold Scriven case.  It is remarkable that they do not treat complaints from the public as readily and in like manner as in the reported instance above.  We do have to consider the fact that the offending solicitor did not just ignore the client's right to an appeal. Irrespective if the solicitor was of opinion that the client stood no chance (for argument's sake) AS INDEED HAPPENED on appeal.  What was and is intriguing IS THE FACT THAT THE LEGAL PROFESSIONS were obstructed from access to Legal Aid funds for the appeal.  When citizens, as PAYING clients, complain about much more serious issues, such as deliberate suppression of material facts and documented evidence, systematically indulged into by solicitous and barristers in their quest for extra work (appeals in corrupted cases standing no chance in our courts) NO ONE CARES AND NO ONE ACTS.   Blatant criminal activities by the legal boffins as licensed criminals. The police are fully aware that such activities are CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUDS on the clients (through abuse of the courts' processes,  as the 'proverbial milking of the cow cartoon depicts) the victims can report the criminal activities INCLUDING FALSE DECLARATIONS AND DOCUMENTS such as the blatant FORGERIES used in the Haringey Housing Benefit scams and constructive frauds on the private landlords*, the police simply ignore the FORGERIES and have as yet to prosecute the criminals. Very simply the law does not apply to the legal circles and professions especially so IF THE CRIMES ARE ENDORSED by persons sitting in judicial chairs, misconducting in public office*. The practice certificates of the legal professionals guarantee them immunity from prosecution for any misconduct and or criminal activity indulged into in the course of theatrical productions in our courts.

In 1998 the long suffering public is informed of  problems.....

The complaints keep rolling in and all the Law Society & OSS can come up with was to shut shop.ossclosr.jpg (110097 bytes)

  • Below the text of the article (using Optical Character Recognition) from 'The Times' of  6th May 1998, image of which we reproduce on the left margin window. In the left margin window another article, also on the same issues, as published in a local free newspaper; we ask readers, researchers and victims of the legal circles, specifically victims of malpractice by solicitors to consider our observations on the issues we point to, especially as to WHY, WHAT FOR and HOW the Press Release by the Law Society, when all that infamous institution had been doing for decades (ever since Mr Andrew Yiannides was the victim of fraudulent abuse of the courts' processes) was and had been to bury all complaints through ARROGANT CONTEMPT FOR THE LAW merely because the police & judicial chair occupants are part of ORGANISED CRIME THROUGH ABUSE OF THE LEGAL SYSTEM & THE COURTS' FACILITIES. [*Link from here to evidence - a FALSE instrument that was even FORGED by the creators & promoters of such a document simply intended to pervert & corrupt justice care of the protection rackets operated through abuse of the courts' facilities; *Link also from here to additional proof, stated   realities when others relied on the very same promoter of the Forgery (decades earlier) to assist them through his invisible services FRAUDULENTLY SECURED (or so they all thought) PECUNIARY ADVANTAGE which in any event could also lead to the creation of additional work & income for the criminals who abuse the citizen's need to seek justice when wronged]
  • We have underlined the last paragraph, of the text below, for the enlightenment of our visitors and for victims to cross relate that text and the content of the article in the Haringey Advertiser of 20th October 1999, reproduced in the left  below 'The Times' article. Victims could compare such 'news' with the way they were treated as victims of "The Self-Perpetuating Cancerous Growth Industry" (© AY) & as added in 1993 "...flourishing as part of the CIUKU Enterprises in our country, care of the Rampant Corruption Jockeys who misconduct in public office" (© AY).
'THE TIMES'  -  Wednesday May 6, 1998
'Solicitors Watchdog Awash `With Complaints'
    A WATCHDOG yesterday announced measures to curb a 30 per cent rise in complaints about solicitors and to increase its efficiency.
    The Office for the Supervision of Solicitors (OSS) will no longer look at a complaint until it has gone through a firm's in-house procedures. Almost half the complaints it gets about 19,000 a year go direct to the Office, despite a rule that all solicitors in England and Wales should have their own complaints procedures.
    The Office is also to set a time limit; those dissatisfied with the in-house procedure must, in most cases, approach the Office within six months.
    The OSS expects to be out of action for 12 weeks, some 2,000 files having been damaged at its Leamington Spa base during the Good Friday floods. On top of that, it is struggling with both the increased number of complaints and a big backlog of inspection work at firms.
    In cases of inadequate professional service or shoddy work, the OSS has the power to order a solicitor to pay compensation of up to £1,000; reduce a solicitor's bill in whole or part, and require a solicitor to correct a mistake at his or her own expense.
In 1999 a local paper reports action, how & what for, (*Link to) our observations
In 2003 a victim of the practices seeks help to CHALLENGE it all

The letter below in HTML (for Links To & From) was settled by Andrew of *human-rights* for submissions to the Chief Executives of the Law Society and the OSS. It was Andrew's intention to submit such challenges for two family members:

  • 1. For Andrew's mother, who was tricked and defrauded of her rights in law by the very solicitor who, decades earlier, engaged in the USE and promotion, OF THE FORGERY we publish in our pages which was generally released in March 2002. A false instrument was created for use in the course of high court proceedings BY THE LEGAL CIRCLES, in order to pervert and corrupt justice.
  • Nothing unusual by, for and in the course of court proceedings from within an alleged democratic state, one that allegedly rests and is founded on law and order. [*Link to list of lovers of it all, alleged victim - challengers]
  • FOUR SOLICITORS were involved in the constructive frauds through use of FALSE INSTRUMENTS [including court orders lacking accountability by the criminals who issued blank cheques to be cashed against the assets of their victim].
  • All engaged in the scams, as protected species, and the masterminds of CIUKU Enterprises....... with the blessings of the police. Nothing unusual!
  • 2. For Andrew's sister, who suffered the usual of indignities and impositions by the licensed criminals, who benefit from practice certificates [issued by the Law Society] and invariably merit special concessions to indulge in the free-for-all that our courts entertain and create through and care of the occupants of judicial chairs. [*Link to explicit challenges WHEN the instigators and users-promoters of the fraudulent application of the courts facilities were CAUSED TO ABANDON THEIR PLANS for a targeted irrelevant man, father, discarded husband].
The letter was SETTLED FOR and posted BY:

Mr Len Miskulin
130 Hanson Drive
IG10 2EA

24 March 2003

The Law Society
The Chief Executive for the:
Office for the Supervision of Solicitors
8 Dormer Place
Leamington Spa
CV32 5AE

Your Ref:. CRO/23230-2001/KP2/KS1

Recorded Delivery:


Dear Sir / Madam

Re: Miskulin, Len COMPLAINT against Devgun Spencer Solicitors

I beg to refer you to the above complaint and the exchanges between your subordinates and myself.

The file should contain enough documented evidence by way of stated 'indisputable facts, supported by actual events and non-events'. The aforesaid realities establish dishonesty, deception and reckless misrepresentations by the member of the Law Society, who relied and carried on relying on the staff and officers below you in/at the Office for the Supervision of Solicitors, or should I say the Overlords Securing the Solicitors future?

I hereby demand that you set yourself the task of forwarding to me and to my associate at Live Beat Dads Organisation by email and a follow-up by mail to:

Mr. Len Miskulin
130 Hanson Drive
Loughton - Essex
IG10 2EA

a list of all documents in the file created and maintained by the OSS for the complaint your 'set-up' received and the staff and officers below you treated in the usual manner with plenty of delays, defaults and omissions from and by allegedly legally trained / experienced persons.

I attach, hereto, printout of a declaration that I downloaded from the 'human-rights' Non Governmental Organisation web-site. I demand that you duly complete and sign it in the presence of a witness and return / post it, forthwith, to the above address. A scanned image of same, should be transmitted by email, IF IT BE YOUR INTENTION TO MAINTAIN THE MENTALITIES OF YOUR SUBORDINATES. Acting in contempt of statute and evidence, as tutored pawns and bishops in the castle of the protection racket that was set up and is maintained by the Law Society appears to be the simple strategy of the Overlords Securing the Solicitors future. Promoting and selling to the naïve and gullible, albeit the helpless and the abandoned victims of and by the legal circles, an allegedly 'professional body, allegedly looks into serious complaints about the Law Society's members, in the order of the day. Nothing but blunt, arrogance and dishonesty because of and through reliance on one another, BUT unacceptable practices from within an allegedly civilised society with law and order as its foundation stones.

I beg to refer and DRAW YOUR ATTENTION to a revealing news item, an article in a free London weekly newspaper. Printout of the article, downloaded from the 'human-rights' web-site, is attached hereto. I wonder if the article ever made the national papers and in particular the serious broad-sheets. I demand that you set yourself the task of providing to me the same service and consideration, for the necessitated appeal. It is notable that in that other situation it was not a case of violated human rights as the causes and reasons commanding an appeal, in my case. Evidently it was a case that was used as a showpiece for consumption by the gullible in the area where the firm of solicitors were/are operating. Need I add that it was also A CASE FOR ABUSE OF THE LEGAL AID FUNDS FACILITY for a doomed case, 'precisely as the offending solicitor had advocated and opined' / given his reasons for not acting as the aggrieved client had requested / instructed the solicitor? Need I point to the fact that the 'offending' solicitor's employers, the firm WAS TO BENEFIT BOTH FINANCIALLY (through blunt abuse of the Legal Aid facility) and by way of 'favourable publicity' in the local press? (*F1)

The case referred to above clearly evinces 'POSITIVE DISCRIMINATION FOR THE PROTECTION OF THE FIRM OF SOLICITORS that employed the offending (!) solicitor. The case also evinces the ever-present SUPPORT FOR THE PLUNDERING OF THE LEGAL AID FUNDS that are secured from Central Government and administered by 'the managers of the Legal Aid Board' (defunct) who were/are all too eager to lend their support to the plunderers of public funds. Need I to point to the fact that the same wolves, pretending to be lambs, are now managing the Legal Services Commission funds? Tax revenue for showcases, as in the Pinochet / Hoffman fiasco. Reckless defaults and omissions as in most complaint cases and SHOWCASES INTENDED AND USED AS PUBLIC RELATIONS EXERCISES by and for the promotion / protection of any firm of solicitors and the Overlords for Securing the Solicitors future.

Copy of this letter is forwarded to the Chief Executive, Mrs Janet Paraskeva, who circulated through the national press, in July 2001, the Law Society's 'promises and plan of action'. Another Public Relations exercise about the errors, the mistakes, the defaults, the omissions and downright dishonesty and deceptions by members, for which your subordinates have done and do their very best to suppress and frustrate, to pervert the truth and to corrupt eventual 'pronouncements / outcome'. Activities by and from legally trained persons, fully intending to 'aid and abet the Law Society's licensed proteges' for the procurement of ever present false representations leading to pecuniary advantages through and for the securing of funds under false pretences.


Len Miskulin

ENCL. As text

cc. To other interested parties & Publication on the Internet

The above letter points to the fact that legally trained professionals ACT IN CONTEMPT OF THE LAW. Our views as to their activities and contempt of the law were also stated in the work of, a book by Dr. A Adoko. He contacted Andrew in February 1999 in respect of the very issues BUT within days he was changing colours and engaged in questionable invitations. Details are now (as of March 2005) released in an explicit page. (*Link to a relevant passage from Dr. A. Adoko's book whereby his conclusions and statements arising out of his experiences with the Law Society and the OSS concur with those of Mr Andrew Yiannides, the founder of Human-Rights.Org, views 25 years earlier).

*Link to the images of a letter Mr Miskulin received a year earlier from the OSS. Access from there the page you can link to from the explicit submissions to the Family Registry. The very submissions did cause the abusers (as other challenges published in the referred to page did) to send the case back to the High Court. There Mr Justice Charles, for obvious reasons, did not seat on the case to deal with the challenges BUT Mr. Justice Singer, who was involved in the pre-arranged theatrical productions in the Foenander -v- Foenander case (for the premeditated 'constructive frauds on the taxpayers' *Link to stated facts) was all to happy to engage afresh in the usual denial of rights to due process and fraud aplenty. (NOTE, please that Mr Miskulin published at www.lbduk.org the events of the day when Mr Justice Singer exhibited his usual attitude to the rule of law and 'due process' in court proceedings)

By 2004 the family closet was bursting and the Law Society was reporting...
In July more news 2004
glsconfr.jpg (58607 bytes)
Below the article in HTML for links to & from.

'The Guardian'
Tuesday July 6, 2004

Law Society could lose power over solicitors
as report condemns failures

Clare Dyer
Legal Correspondent

The Law Society risks losing its powers to regulate solicitors as a report out today reveals it has failed to meet all but one of six government targets for dealing with complaints against the profession.

The Society's performance on key targets is worse than its record the previous year, says the Legal Services Ombudsman, the watchdog overseeing its complaints handling process.

The Ombudsman, Zahida Manzoor, was satisfied with the Society's handling of complaints in only 53.3% of the cases brought to her from April 2003 to March 2004, down from 67.2% the previous year and was well short of the 75% target set by the Department of Constitutional Affairs.

The latest figures come despite an all-out effort by the professional body for solicitors in England and Wales to fend off government threats to strip its power to regulate the profession. Critics ask whether it can regulate and represent the profession at the same time.

The public's complaints included protests about delays in making wills and winding up estates, failure to keep them informed about the progress of conveyancing and that their solicitors were acting at the same time for other clients with conflicting interests. There were also criticisms that the solicitors were overcharging and failing to spell out how much a case might cost from the start.

Those grievances were compounded by the society's failings once complaints about its members had been brought.

The report cites Dr. B who sued the solicitor who represented him in a personal injury claim for negligence. He won compensation but his complaint to the society over the solicitor's poor service took three and a half years. Just as a decision loomed the solicitor was struck off for professional misconduct in another case.

Today's report will make it more likely that Sir David Clementi, the Prudential chairman chosen by the government to review the regulation of legal services, will recommend an independent body to take over the role when he delivers his report at the end of the year.

Against a goal of 60% of cases to be closed within three months, the society achieved 46.7% compared with 52.9% the previous year. It closed only 67.5% of cases within six months against a 75% target.

The only turnaround target met was to close 85% of cases in a year. It closed 88.4%.

Another indicator is a rise in ex-gratia payouts volunteered by the society where it accepts its complaints handling has been faulty. In the first quarter of 2004 these totalled £165,864 compared with £28,414 in the first quarter of 2003.

Ms Manzoor has told Sir David she thinks the society should lose its complaints role. She supports an overreaching independent regulator of legal services with an independent complaints body reporting to it, leaving the society to deal with serious disciplinary offences.

Last year after several warnings the government activated the Access to Justice Act 1999 to appoint a Legal Services Complaints Commission with power to set targets and fine the society up to £5m, if it fails to meet them. Ms Manzoor, who combines that post with her ombudsman role, expects to set new targets soon.

After reviewing more than 2,000 complaints personally she identified the main failings of solicitors as excessive delays, excessive costs, poor responsiveness to communication, failing to act in the clients best interest, failing to clarify the implications of actions, bad communications.

The society's chief executive, Janet Paraskeva, said, "Over the past 12 months the Law Society has resolved over 1,500 more cases than we have received, Fifty per cent of cases are dealt with within three months and 70% within six months".

(C) The Guardian 2004 - UK

  • We relate below the foundations upon which the arrogant abusers of public office have been creating and expanding their type of societies in our allegedly civilised democracy, one that allegedly rests and is founded on principles of law and order.
  • A typical example of 'the reliable bricks and mortar they use can be recognised in the activities and the performance of an alleged victim-challenger, Mr. Maurice Kellett and his affiliates / associates. (*F3)
  • His false assertions and proclamations, about his alleged expertise on the Freemasons, amount to nothing short of PROMOTION OF THE POWERS THAT BE, as his postings in newsgroups establish without any doubt.
  • As part of a group of similarly engaging 'experts' on promoting the powers of the Freemasons, they promote one another and the sum total of their contributions towards their alleged challenges in newsgroups, also in permanent web-pages on the Internet, simply amount to nothing short of: - "Do not do as I did, for they will do to you what they did to me".
  • The facts and the realities we point to, below, are but a typical example of the type of person upon whom the criminals, who organise, manage and control the lives of 'the serfs' = *the sons of men of planet earth*, rely to carry on as they have been for centuries / millennia.
  • The arrogant dreamer, Mr Maurice Kellett, had been pointed by Mr Andrew Yiannides, to the extract in the 'Old Testament' to which we have been pointing our visitors, since January 2000 (*new visitors can link from here to the extract) and he was one of the first three craft-y ones to have benefited from the information we imparted to them pointing to the connection of the Freemasons to the most vile of fraudulent promotions to mankind for over 2300 years, the Old Testament (*F4). Typical of all fraudsters who misrepresent themselves as alleged victim-challengers WHILE OPERATING AS THE FRONT LINE SOLDIERS WHO ARE HOLDING THE FORT FOR THE ABUSERS OF TRUST & PUBLIC OFFICE, Freemasons or not.
  • We released on 3rd March 2008, a House of Lords ruling / precedent case dating back to 1940 whereby their Lordships addressed and deliberated upon the very elements that apply to the performance and behaviour of all the fraudsters-club recruits (*link from here to the page where we qualify how we arrived at the term for such evil persons) we name and expose in our pages   
  • The text from 'The Brotherhood' [*Link from here to FOOTNOTE below] had been and was published, on the Internet, by Mr Maurice Kellett, a victim(!) who also joined the human-rights.org Community On Line, as subsequently transpired, for other purposes than 'OUR AIMS' qualify. Another web-site (jiwalu.demon.co.uk) which he set-up and had been maintaining was in place long before he joined the Community On Line. His vociferous proclamations and his failures to support his assertions / allegations (about the Freemasons) with any evidence, most certainly amounted to childish 'scenarios intended only for subliminal indoctrination of the readers of his output'. Indeed such was the situation with a number of other allegedly concerned 'citizens' and products of The Organised FRAUD IMPOSED ON THE SERFS & CORRUPTION OF MORONS OF HIS APTITUDE / MENTALITY, through Public Servants & in particular the Law Enforcement Agencies. [*Link from here to a blunt FORGERY that was created and introduced by solicitors & barristers attached to and born of a Claim for Fraudulent Misrepresentations in commercial business. The forgery was simply intended for use to cause the plaintiff, the victim of fraud, to abandon his claim against the defendants, and, as transpired it was used / promoted to the plaintiff, by the solicitor, Mr Kypros Nicola of Nicolas & Co. London N4. for arrogant corruption and perversion of Justice. Needless to say, it was all entertained / ignored by the police & judicial chair occupants, all the way to the Court of Appeal. Nothing unusual, simply PART & PARCEL OF THE FACILITIES USED AT & BY THE COURTS in an allegedly civilised state, one that is sold to the misinformed and ill-educated 'serfs' in an allegedly civilised Democracy, one that allegedly is founded and rests on principles of law and order].  
  • He, Mr. Maurice Kellett, was asked on numerous occasions, over the years, to place links (bookmarks / anchor points) to the relevant part which we subsequently published in our pages and this page. Conveniently and under various pretexts Mr Kellett had been defaulting to act as requested for years. Visitors will be afforded opportunities to read of arrogant falsehoods in respect of 'his alleged membership of the Community on Line' and the liberties he indulged in without reference to the founder & without any authorisation to act as he did WHILE ACTING IN CONTEMPT OF THE PRINCIPLES he endorsed when he joined the Community. (*Link to OUR AIMS).
  • The non-existent co-operation from and by 'a victim'(?) must be compared with the arrangements covered in the text from the published work, based on research by the late Stephen Knight, [*Link to FOOTNOTE below].
  • The CoL member had not been in touch for well over two years when he contacted us with tongue in cheek arrogance for which he received an appropriate reply; in due course it will be made public* [*Link from here to the RELEASED material]. He appeared to have gone underground following 'eviction from his home', one of the properties that 'conveniently' was converted to legal costs, through the usual abuse of the legal system, care of the manipulators of it all. Conscious of the constructive frauds, and participating in the 'enforcement of the theft of properties through abuse of the courts' facilities', the police, as always. [*Link to another example when THREE PROPERTIES WERE CONVERTED TO LEGAL COSTS and the victim, just happy to benefit from assistance for the reward under the table to persons who cannot possibly claim to have been, be blackmailed into acceptance of the parts pre-scripted for them to play as alleged victims, which is what such persons engage in thereafter].
  • The criminal indulgences and activities care of the Law Enforcement Agencies and the abusers of public office, are the main bone of contention that we, and the citizens, ARE & WILL BE pointing to our representatives in government, directly and through our and other on Line pages, published by victims and members of the co-operating Community of CHALLENGERS WHO USE THEIR RIGHTS - AS ASSURED IN LAW.
  • A typical example of how we addressed, in April 2003, a Member of Parliament (the Rt. Hon. Frank Field, ex Minister) can be accessed in our pages. [*Link to the material facts covered in the letter that caused the Home Secretary to write of his position as an elected Member of Parliament].
  • Access, also, a typical example of how 'victims'(!) simply promote relentlessly the powers of the criminals who are in control, WHILE DEFAULTING TO CO-OPERATE [*Link to another typical example] & WORK WITH OTHERS, TO ANY AGENDA, FOR A COMMON GOAL (as the abusive Public(!) SERVANTS(?) do). Link directly to the page/part or copy the URL below for posting on to others who may have been victims of the legal circles and Public(!) Servants(?).
  • http://www.uk-human-rights.org/2lipstalk.htm#clear

Access the material in the above page and consider all the implications that arise in and through the presentation of the events we describe / cover in the left margin/pane where the link (from this page) takes you. Then consider the material facts that are covered and pointed to through the EXPLICIT ADDENDA that can be accessed in our updated pages file.

Who but the 'crafty' and conniving 'fraudsters club recruits' responsible FOR THE PERPETUATION OF THE SYSTEM OF OPERATIONS IN PLACE FOR MILLENNIA? Consider this and the question below with the material both link to and THEN recognise the element of "Subliminal Indoctrination Tactics & ploys through alleged victims and or 'sold to the system as is idiots' who fail to recognise the issue of 'Accessories & Abettors to the Constructive Frauds Through the Courts', that all visitors can read of and how, by using the link from this paragraph to our exclusive page. (NOTE: Each and every one of the persons we list and name as 'fraudsters club recruits', are persons who claim to be legal gurus and have been through the motions, all the way to the reward under the table. Others whom we name and list as charlatans and stooges are persons who work with the fraudsters club recruits (and the legal circles) in and FOR the promotion of the system as is. All share a common factor: THEY ADAMANTLY REFUSED & FAILED TO ADDRESS THE ISSUES COVERED IN THE EXCLUSIVE PAGE that visitors to our pages can access from here too)

Who but the very 'victims'(?) responsible for 'the subjugation of the masses through THEIR relentless promotion of 'the powers(!) of THE CRIMINALS they know of and yet they simply indulge in the perpetual promotions of the scenarios covered / stated in our pages? [*Link]

DO read the words attributed to the great teacher Jesus Christ as stated by / covered in St. Luke's Gospel, that we publish in our Quotes Page.


The images below exhibit reckless records by a solicitor accused for letting down his client; and the professional body licensing such persons treating the deceived client with utter disregard.
lslm103r.jpg (160257 bytes) lslm203r.jpg (189175 bytes) lslm303r.jpg (148421 bytes)
  • We were meant to receive copies of the replies from the OSS & the Law Society.
  • Mr Miskulin was to arrange for the friend who was present when Ms Lee, the CAFCASS officer visited Mr Miskulin at his residence was to attend to his mail but we never received the copies.
  • Since Mr. Miskulin left for his country of origin we received only an email simply informing us that he reached safe and was looking for a suitable abode.
  • We later heard of friends visiting him in Croatia but we never merited any other contact or information in respect of his 'new life' back in the old country.
  • We simply published thereafter the facts and the realities in the page /len.htm and the facts attached to how contact was made with us initially; also how certain developments spoke louder than assertions and promotions as to intentions. [*Link to the stated early contact / developments]
*Link from here to the page where we published challenges submitted to & lodged with the court by Mr Miskulin, as settled by us.

The extract below is from 'The Brotherhood'
Researched work by Stephen Knight.

....."I asked how this action might be taken.

`Solicitors are very good at it said Christopher. Get your man involved in something legal - it need not be serious - and you have him'. Solicitors I was told, are `past masters' at causing endless delays, generating useless paperwork, ignoring instructions, running immense bills and misleading clients into taking decisions damaging to themselves. Masonic police can harass, arrest on false charges, and plant evidence. 'A businessman in a small community or person in public office arrested for dealing in child pornography, for indecent exposure, or for trafficking in drugs, is at the end of the line', said Christopher. `He will never work again. Some people have committed suicide after experiences of that kind'. [*Link from here to a perfect example of the criminal activities the Legal circles and the Police engage in, in an allegedly civilised democracy).

Masons can bring about the situation where credit companies and banks withdraw credit facilities from individual clients and tradesmen, said my informant. Banks can foreclose. People who rely on the telephone for their work can be cut off for long periods. Masonic employees of local authorities can arrange for a person's drains to be inspected, and extensive damage to be reported, thus burdening the person with huge repair bills; workmen carrying out the job can 'find' in reality cause - further damage. Again with regard to legal matters a fair hearing is hard to get when a man in ordinary circumstances is in financial difficulties. If he is trying to fight a group of unprincipled Freemasons skilled in using the 'network' it will be impossible because Masonic Department of Health and Social Security and Law Society officials can delay applications for Legal Aid endlessly. /end of extract. [For the root to it all we invite victims, readers and researchers to access the page where we expose the biggest fraud on the sons of men, ongoing as of the 3rd Century BC *Link]

NOTE: The above extract (from 'The Brotherhood) is included in this page for the simple reason that many of the victims who contacted us over the years 1995-2004 had been directed / pointed to us by the great puke production machine, one James Todd, of VOMIT (Victims of Masonic Ill Treatment) repute. His psychosis and relentless promotions without so much as an element of EVIDENCE in support of his promotions were recognised as nothing but Subliminal Indoctrination of those who accept his representations without any proof. Among the many we had contact with, over the years,  there were two we worked closely with and supported their work towards exposure of the rampant fraud and corruption of society, *we emphasise corruption of society* through the courts and the Law Enforcement Agencies, in general. We hasten to add that the co-operation was a case of one way traffic only, as happens when arrogantly selfish individuals OR EVIL PERSONS who are acting to an agenda of their own or as lovers of that which they complain of and about is their spring board. The two plus James Todd and one Nicholas Stamoulakatos, all four very vociferous Free Mason bashers, received information and EVIDENCE that connects the brotherhood to the vilest work ever to be presented to humans (thinkers) and ALL were pointed out to the issue of intellectual property and the law on copyright. All were told not to use the information without reference to source and credit to the work / research by the founder of human-rights, Mr Andrew Yiannides. Needles to say they crawled back in the sand as perfect specimens of the proverbial ostrich. Evidently what they decline to read or look at, does not exist! Of such persons, the bricks and mortar the castles are built by the criminals who are in control of pseudo-democracies. All arranged through the type of facilities that convert 'conditioned illiterates in law' to lovers of the fraud on the taxpayers, as covered in our exclusive page ALL TAXPAYERS should access and point others to its content also. [*Link from here to the arrangements in place that convert 'conditioned' victims of the legal circles and the courts to lovers of the rampant fraud on and corruption of society]
  1.  The Press Barons and the Intellectual Prostitutes they retain, sure know how to serve and promote CIUKU Enterprises, as organised, managed and controlled through the thoroughly corrupted Legal System and the courts. In the case stated above (letters to the Chief Executive Officers of both the Law Society and its clone, the O.S.S = Office Securing the Solicitors future) the Public(!) Servants(?) at and from within the Legal Aid / Legal Services Commission, party to the assaults on targeted assets and abuse of the Legal Aid Certificates for legal assistance to used & created fraudsters. Public office abused for constructive fraud on targeted assets and citizens as we cover in our pages & as careful analysis of the SCENARIOS FOR PROMOTION of the legal system, without so much as a hint about the plundering of the Budget funds, recklessly. [*Link from here to the foundations for the 'plundering of the national budget' opinion. Concerned / interested citizens, should access from here & consider the simple fact that the root of it all goes back to the times when the editors / creators of the New Testament recorded words to the lawyers of those days, which words they attributed to Jesus Christ as of His days].
   2.  Visitors can *link from here to a web-site where they can read of arrogant denials of rights, and the creation of the usual constructive frauds through abuse of the courts facilities FOR BLUNT THEFT OF PROPERTIES. It goes without saying that OBSTRUCTING JUSTICE (appeals warranted as a result of the arrogant abuse of judicial chair occupation) WAS / IS BUT THE KISS OF DEATH & constitutes a criminal offence [*Link to a challenge made of European Court of Appeal staff who engage(d) in such activities]. Visitors, readers, researchers are reminded that *rights assured in law*, are indeed treated as properties under the law. Visitors will be reading of the tribulations of a family that was targeted by abusers of public office who, not surprisingly, declined the invitation to endorse and forward, to their victims, the explicit DECLARATION that specifically covers the type of criminal, in intent, activities ongoing in the courts. Citizens who are faced with such evil activities, when they seek justice (in UK courts and in the courts in other pseudo-democracies, that we know of) can download and use the form in order to challenge any public servant who fails to exercise his or her public duties within the law and the terms of their appointment to public office. It should be clear to all readers, who visit our pages, that public servants who fail to commit themselves to the stipulated areas the form provides / covers, they elect to comply with the request / demand and default because they recognise the simple fact that they were/are not acting within the law. Their failures, therefore, point to an indirect admission that they knew they were/are ACTING ILLEGALLY or IN CONTEMPT OF THE LAW and in contempt of the rights of the citizens to benefit from true information, of which the citizens are assured in law, yet obstructed and denied, to the citizens, by the administrators of the law and public services. 
   3.  We had to create a page where we released email exchanges with Mr Maurice Kellet. We acted after he had established for the umpteenth time, over a number of years and in the most obvious of evil ways, his position as a convert-to and as a lover of the FACILITIES IN PLACE FOR CORRUPTION OF MORONS & MALIGNED OF HIS MENTALITY. Our patience with such persons had been worn very thin and such abusers HAD TO BE EXPOSED for their parts in promoting and expanding 'the method of operations' which we cover in an exclusive page, which page NOT ONE OF THE FRAUDSTERS WE NAME & EXPOSE, EVER BOTHERED TO CONCERN THEMSELVES WITH THE REALITIES WE COVER ^ POINT TO IN THE PAGE. Readers and researchers need to take on board the fact that the only objective of persons we name and expose, is to suck-in, to cause or to have victims of the legal circles, of the courts, of the police and of public servants to be drawn or to be sent to them (by the ill-informed and by other lovers & promoters of the system of operation) IN ORDER TO USE & COERCE NEW VICTIMS TO GO FOR THE REWARDS AT THE END OF THE LINE, AS STIPULATED (and we clarify in our pages) BY THE CREATORS & MANAGERS OF THE ORGANISED CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY, THE TAXPAYERS, IN OUR PSEUDODEMOCRACY. *Link from here to the page where we released the email exchanges with Mr. M. Kellett, the fraud of an alleged human (thinker); read and recognise why we released in 2008 email exchanges -years earlier- with the same charlatan after challenging his evil ways to which we pointed him in the email exchanges which we used in order to create the specific page, in the first instance. Visitors must consider the challenges to the dancing partners of Mr. Maurice Kellett, the Freemasons who published something about him and our very page after visiting it, and misrepresenting it in their web-page as part of his well-known diatribe..... indicating thus that persons (other Freemasons) who read their contributions / comments about the page need not bother to access Mr. Kellett's usual trash...... hence our challenge at the top of the page to the Freemasons to use any grey-matter they may have gifted them with, by their creator, the alleged creator of all and everything.    
   4.  *Link from here to the page where we publish the evidence connecting the Freemasons to the plans of the creators of the alleged creator of all and everything. In the page also we relate and publish evidence attached to a specific scenario that exposes a group of organised Freemasons who acted in contempt of communities they allegedly were representing as Christian Orthodox Hellenes (Greeks). Yet they abused the trust placed in them and they indulged / acted as Freemasons and not as the other states they allegedly were representing (those who sent them along for) as their representatives and as delegates to the convention. 
   5.  xxx
   6.  xxx
   7.  xxx
   8.  xxx
   9.  xxx
  10. xxx


Link to:  Home Office    Link to: Citizens Alternative Precedents     Link to: Violations Pleaded    Link to: Updated Pages       Link to: Solicitors    
Link to: The Law PROVIDES for theft of properties through False Instruments that luck accountability by their creators Most IMPORTANT Legal Argument for ALL VICTIMS TO TAKE ON BOARD
Link to:   Solicitors     Link to:  Corrupt Britain     Link to Yard Investigates the untouchables      
Link to:  Misconduct in Public Office An important Court of Appeal Precedent case relative to officers of the law
Link to: Constructive Frauds on Private Landlords as instigated and processed BY PUBLIC SERVANTS and officers of the law


To HomePage 

The creator of this website was inviting victims to access URrights & join him there with other victims to expose & challenge abusers of trust & public office until the providers of the facilities >ning.com< introduced new terms and conditions for the provision of the facilities. Access from here and read of the imposed states by the brains behind ning.com and consider only one element "WHY OBSTRUCT & HINDER THE DOWNLOAD of the existing material at URrights.ning.com >the intellectual properties of the creator of that presence on the Internet and those who joined him there? Read below of the unacceptable conduct and behaviour by the reckless abusers of trust, who set out to obstruct and blackmail the creator of URrights.ning

Persons who are genuinely concerned and object to the ways they were / are being treated by alleged servants of the publicand the law >in any PSEUDOdemocracy, or whatever states / conditions they are subjected to< by abusers of public facilities and public office >as we cover in our web-pages< should contact webmaster@human-rights.org for information relevant to the creation of similar facilities for INFOrmation on URrights, for facilities for URrights EUrope and for a NETwork of URrights activists.

  • APOLOGIES to friends and persons who could not access URrights following the recent changes by the providers of the facility (ning.com) Andrew Yiannides created and used the portal to create the presence on the Internet for the group of victims / challengers who joined with him to expose and challenge the arrogant and blunt abuse of public services in all allegedly civilised societies > PSEUDODEMOCRACIES <.

  • The changes related to the introduction of charges for the facilities, included the facility for ning.com to archive the material at URrights; also the facility to download the archived material to the creator's system (computer) while the creator and his group of friends considered which of the level of charges and service the group was to adopt.

  • HOWEVER the creator, Andrew Yiannides, WAS UNABLE TO DOWNLOAD THE ARCHIVED MATERIAL and all attempts to engage the providers and their staff in reasonable explanation as to WHY THE FAILURES TO CONNECT / DOWNLOAD from the ning.com servers THE ARCHIVED MATERIAL, were contemptuously ignored.

  • Emails to the Publicity, to the Promotion, to the Public Relations, also to the Chief Executive's Office merited no response whatsoever from anyone acting for ning.com

  • In the circumstances Andrew will appreciate any information related to the problems covered above. Andrew will also appreciate any information relative to exchanges with or email postings, from ning.com to existing members.

  • EXISTING URrights members, victims of the legal system, victims of solicitors and the courts should access the updated pages at .org/solicitors.htm and .org/solfraud.htm by using the links from the list below.

Below pages where we expose known lovers of it all, users and maintenance engineers of the system as is

.org/1999dfax.htm .org/1ofmany.htm .org/2lipstalk.htm .org/4deceit.htm .org/absolute.htm .org/abusers.htm
.org/account4.htm .org/actors.htm .org/actors2.htm .org/adoko.htm .org/bankers.htm .org/beware.htm
.org/blunket1.htm .org/chaldep1.htm .org/confraud.htm .org/contract.htm .org/convicti.htm .org/courts.htm
.org/corruptcourts.htm .org/crimesin.htm .org/dreamers.htm .org/evesused.htm .org/evilones.htm .org/famfraud.htm
.org/govolso.htm .org/guesswhy.htm .org/len.htm .org/mauricek.htm .org/media.htm .org/solfraud.htm
.org/solicitors.htm .org/someplan.htm .org/someploy.htm .org/thefacts.htm .org/theproof.htm .org/thenerve.htm
.org/twisted.htm .org/uaccount.htm .org/ukmm.htm .org/uwatchit.htm .org/watchit1.htm .org/yourtax.htm
  • Every single person we name and expose in the above pages elected to ignore THEIR OBLIGATIONS TO REPORT (to 'the serfs' = 'the taxpayers'), THE ABUSERS OF PUBLIC OFFICE & PUBLIC FACILITIES. All were/are relying on the Intellectual Prostitutes, from within the media, to keep it all in the family closet.
  • All, as typical twin-tongue hypocrites carry on complaining about the media for failing to report & for suppressing the facts and the realities they allegdely reported to the hard of hearing, to the otherwise committed angels blowing their silent trumpets for decades, all ready and gearing to welcome the expansion of the New World Order.
  • Of such parts the contributions from and failings of the persons we name and expose, AS IF THEIR OWN SILENCE, THEIR FAILURES  & THEIR BLUNT OBSTRUCTIONS to the work and other actions by the creator of this website, Andrew Yiannides, treated by one and all as if non-existent with the exception when the wily Norman Scarth, set off to abuse the trust he was allowed to benefit from, while his parts and questionable activities / performance were under scrutiny, specifically after HE FAILED to publish the full transcript of the Court of Appeal hearing HE WAS ALLOWED TO RECORD* [*Link from here to the food for thought page created by Andrew Yiannides, in the first instance].
  • Not one ever bothered to address the issues we expose in the explicit page, despite the fact that we have been pointing all of our contacts, since May 1992, to it all.
  • Visitors, readers and researchers are urged / invited to access and read the letter which the Hon. Secretary of the Litigants In Person Society, Mr. Norman Scarth sent to the founder of human-rights, Mr. Andrew Yiannides, reproduced in the page .org/4deceit.htm* [*L]
  • The author's statements, such as 'what for and why seek additional assistance', thereby spelling out his parts as a lover of it all.
  • Common sense dictates, that he should have directed his request to his partners in deceptions aplenty, one & all engaging in fraudulent misrepresentations AND NOTED TO HAVE, WILFULLY, BEEN SUPPRESSING, FROM THE TAXPAYERS, THE FACTS OF LIFE RELATIVE TO THE RAMPANT ABUSE OF THE COURTS FACILITIES as the failure of all to co-operate as covered and pointed to at:- [*L]. One and all fallen to the facilities for fraud aplenty on the taxpayers and the corruption of illiterates in law, the conditioned victims of the legal circles & courts who fall to the blackmail element attached to the REWARD for keeping the realities away from the taxpayers; just like the media and the Ministers responsible for the application of long existing law to the criminal activities we cover in our pages, do.
  • All the while one and all were / are engaging in the scenarios we cover in the exclusive page, which page the author of the letter which Mr Norman Scarth sent to Andrew Yiannides, afforded us the opportunity to address the issue of the contributions of his partners and affiliates in fraud aplenty on the taxpayers; despite the reminder one and all, named in the new page simply shoved it all in the dark corners of their devoid of grey matter skulls, their perverted / corrupted mind(s)

On Sunday morning, the 19th September 2010, the Deputy Prime Minister, leader of the Liberal-Democrats in the course of the BBC TV politics programme, spoke of the coalition government's commitment to address the element of waste and fraud through the public services sector. We trust and hope that the elements we expose in our pages and the parts adopted by the conditioned victims of the legal circles, the persons who engage in PROMOTING & EXPANDING THE ONGOING CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUD ON THE TAXPAYERS, THROUGH ABUSE OF THE COURTS' FACILITIES, will be on the top of the list of government priorities.
Visitors, readers & researchers are urged to access the letters to Minister Frank Field [*L] after he had been directed by the Prime Minister to think/do the unthinkable.
Link also from here [*L] to the explicit letter to the Home Secretary in December 1998 with submissions arising out of the RAMPANT HOUSING BENEFIT FRAUD
On Tuesday 23rd November 2010, 'the Guardian' in its Comment & Debate page carried an article by Nick Clegg, the Deputy Prime Minister. In the evening of the same day the Deputy Prime Minister addressed a large audience at Kings place in respect of the government's changes on university students fees / loans.
Access from here the page where we reproduce an image of 'the Guardian' article & consider the simple fact that we, alone, have been asserting and proclaiming our objections to the theft of funds from the national budget leading to the ever-increasing annual deficit in the state's balance of payments.

ACCESS:  http://www.justice-uk.human-rights.org/ (For an important message at this Community-on-Line web-site) & thereafter,
Access also http://www.law.society.complaints.and.human-rights.org/ (Judge instigates Fraud On Tax Payers - he knows not the difference between 'imposed' & 'no undue influence'). APOLOGIES FOR THE DISAPPEARANCE OF THIS WEBSITE.It appears that the beneficiary of the work, both for applications to the courts in the United Kingdom and the submissions to the European Court for Human Rights* [*Link from here to the Statement of Facts submitted to the ECoHR], arranged with the providers of the free web space to erase the Intellectual Property of Andrew Yiannides, the founder of the human-rights Community-on-Line, without any reference to the creator of the website and owner of the Intellectual Property!
鼯font> Copyright subsists on all material in our web-site, owned by the authors of same.
Visitors can refer to these pages in any non commercial activity, so long as attribution is given as to source. License to use, for commercial or other specific use of the material, shall have been secured in writing first, from the owners of any property and material from these pages. No material shall be reproduced in any form and by any means without prior agreement and or license in writing from the copyright owners. The Press are invited to contact us if they wish to publish material in the Public Interest, As We Do.
For any problems or questions regarding this web-site contact:  webmaster