Page KEY Page Changes13 Aug. 2008
*Page First published, February 1997*
HELP US TO HELP YOU Please (*Link to plea). JOIN other Victims On Line. Publish your Statement of Facts and the
Evidence you have. Use your rights in law (link) and ACT with others against the offenders. Join in joint actions if you have been fobbed
off and have had your rights obstructed to and or denied by the abusers of the legal
system. ACCESS & READ the explicit submissions to the Chief Executives of the Law
Society and the Office for the Supervision of solicitors. Elect to ASSERT
YOUR RIGHTS to challenge collectively the criminals who have been in control for
millennia. READ the words attributed to Jesus Christ according to St. Luke. (Link to the quotes page).
Affiliated Sites For 'The CAMILA Project' DATA Collection
lbduk.org (*Link to update)
All SERIOUS offers from webmasters who are engaged in
publication of web-pages, web-sites will be welcome. We look forward to adding your site
to the above list and your readiness to co-operate in and for data collection.
LIST of leaders of groups and webmasters
who REFUSED/FAILED to co-operate. The same also arrogantly FAILED / DEFAULTED to address
the issue of Organised abuse of the courts FOR fraudulent conversion of private
(citizen's) assets and the fraudulent distribution of taxpayers contributions to the
national budget. Access the exclusive exposures where we point
to and publish the EVIDENCE of the facilities in place FOR the creation of societies of
1. LIPS (*Site References)
2. UKMM (*Site References) 3. ELC (*Site References)
4. Families Need Fathers
5. Fathers 4 Justice
7. Contempt of Court (*emails)
We dedicate the two images below to
all of the charlatans who came along, as stooges and lovers of the rampant fraud through
the courts. All indulged in many an act of fraudulent misrepresentation and EVIL
ACTIVITIES as part of their contribution towards the maintenance of the system in place.
We are to name every one of the idiots who were of opinion that they could make either the
law to appear to be an ass or the founder of human-rights, Mr Andrew Yiannides.
The above NOTICE was / is typical of the top cover sheets that
were / are attached to letters specifically addressed to Ministers. The notice was
intended for all senior Public Servants to consider. Our experiences over 21 years
by then, established that many have been and are followers of the EVIL TEACHINGS BY
EXAMPLE STATED in the most vile of works ever to have been presented to the sons of men.
(*Link to the most explicit and revealing lesson that no human = thinker,
could possibly overlook, or accept as promoted by the followers of such evil ways).
We dedicate the letter below to Mr Johan M.
R. Foenander an alleged Christian. He attempted to secure, from Andrew Yiannides, a
Statement with Half Truths with suppression of the core elements, relative to the
activities he was noted to have been a promoter user & an overzealous participating
fraudster in. He was working with others for the imposition of the constructive
fraud we point to and cover in explicit pages [*Page1]
[*Page2]) Others were noted to be co-operating
with him for and ONLY TOWARDS the IMPLEMENTATION of the blunt and arrogant constructive
frauds, on the taxpayers, through abuse of the courts, as covered in our pages. [*Link from here to the page where we cover his parts & point to
relative evidence. *Link from here to another
page where we cover his part in the creation of material he & his partner asserted was
intended for use at court, when in reality it was all but a smokescreen and blunt
misrepresentations & a case of 'Dust in your eyes, suckers', for the persons
targeted with such ploys'.
In 1996 the letter below was confirmed
received, after pointing out past failures by the Home Office / Secretary to concern
themselves with the issues raised. Read the letter and relate to events and activities
you, visitor / victim may have experienced personally.
Q: WHO responsible for the police?
A: The Home Secretary.
YET we have charlatans and mischief makers promoting whatever the managers &
controllers of CIUKU Enterprises pre-ordained for the serfs. [*Link from here to an example from and about an alleged victim,
how he acted / behaved towards us. The documented evidence ESTABLISHES that he was
more than just selfish, for IF HE WAS GENUINE he would have co-operated instead of running
around promoting the powers that be, the abuse of judicial chair occupation by the type of
judges he allegedly was complaining about. IN FACT HE WAS just PROMOTING THE EVIL
ACTIVITIES he had been subjected to, care of 'the ploy of subliminal indoctrination of
others he was targeting as a corrupted frausdsters club recruit [*L].
Clue? The dreamer / fraud of an alleged human, WAS NOT PREPARED, NOR WILLING TO EXPOSE
& CHALLENGE IN THE PUBLIC DOMAIN THE ABUSERS OF THE COURTS' FACILITIES, just like the
rest of the fraudsters he was rubbing shoulders with; one and all collectively promoting
the practices we are exposing and challenging in our pages).
KEY to page
Page CHANGES - List
Letters TO - List Page&Site Letters FROM List Page&Site
News ARTICLES - Page List
Page IMAGES - List
Human Rights Act Introduced
LAW Convention Rights
LAW European Union Rights
The page - ISSUES
This Page - QUOTES
The SITE - PAGES
Site QUOTES - page
VICTIM Let down by
OTHER SITES - Short List
REPORTING CRIMES - List
Article 6.1 Court Hearings
Article 6.2 Court Hearings
Article 6.3 Court Hearings
Article 8.1 Respect 4 Family
Article 8.2 Family Rights
Article 9 Free TO THINK +++
Article 10 Free to Share Info
Article 11 Free Join Assemble Article
13 About Officials
Article 14 No Discrimination
Article 38 Double FRAUD
Letters TO -
1. April 2003 Frank Field MP
2. Dec. 1999 Prime Minister
3. Dec. 1998 Home Secretary
4. Mar. 2003 Law Society ++
5. August 2003 ECourtHR
1. Part- SOLICITOR To Client 2. Prime Minister Nov. 1999
3. CEO Haringey
4. Haringey Council Dreamer
5. Police Promoting Just LIES
6. Scarth Seeks Information
7. LCD Expose Police LIES
8. An Illiterate LCDpt. Officer
9. ECourtHR September 2003
10. Lord Chancellor's Dpt.
Articles - List
1. L.E.S by David Blunkett
2. D. Mail Free For All 2001
3. CHANGES - List
Articles - List
1. L.E.S by David Blunkett
2. D. Mail Free For All 2001
3. D. Express Boys Records
4. PM. Global Role For Britain
5. No Need to Raise TAXES
1. LES by David Blunkett
2. CHANGES - List
3. House of Lords RULING
4. Letter to Prime Minister
5. PM Sends Submit. to H/O
Is In Mortal Danger, so long as...
2. Days of the Blind Deaf and Dumb
Media Are Over
3. Most abused & Breached piece of legislation by.....
4. The INTERNET is here and so is Freedom Of Information
& Exchange of Ideas.
1. Added Letter to MP
2. Added Law Reports
3. Edited Introduction
4. Added Ab. Lincoln's Quote
5. Importance of Publication
6. Added Articles 13 & 14
7.20 April 2005: IMPORTANT ANSWER to the question posed under Article 13.
8. Added letter to the Home Secretary, Michael Howard in 1993 relative to
abuse of the Court facilities & BREACH OF DUTY BY THE POLICE.
1. Implementing security and rights assured in law.
2. Members of Parliament and other Public(!)
Servants(?). Their retainers command other than the defaults and omissions they
3. Democracy IS in mortal danger.
4. Home Secretary Acted
5. HOW the dictatorship through the back door has been and is being imposed in all
pseudo-democracies : The ANSWER and ploys used.
CRIMINAL ACTIVITIES REPORTED TO :-
1. The Rt. Hon. Frank Field Minister
for Social Security [*Link to page where we
cover the reports]
2. Social Security Fraud officers / HQ
- Leeds. [*Link to the page and an explicit
letter covering the arrogant fraud]
3. The Prime Minister at his Private Office.
Minister acted in accordance with his duties to the citizens, to the law and to his own
However, some junior in
the post room at the Home Office assumed that he had higher authority than the elected. Established practices as organised by CIUKU Enterprises.
Public(!) Servants(?) So long as MP's the Media Barons and all who dangle on the
strings of the puppeteers ignore it all, it should be all right; so CIUKU rules provide.
After all, ALL LAW IS PUBLISHED IN invisible ink for the sighted & not in Braille for
the blind. No one, therefore can read ANY Act of Parliament or Articles that Government's
subscribe to under International Treaties & Accords. [*Link to the problems created by
Public Servants after judicial chair occupants 'ELECTED TO ACT IN CONTEMPT OF THE
LAW", specifically when the legal circles indulged in the use and promotion of a
FORGERY in the course of High Court proceedings].
BUT as can be deduced from
the letter below, a junior at the Home Office (post room) indulged. Noting but the usual
invisible services and waffle created by the lowest of the low of Public(!) Servants(?). A
person retained by CIUKU Enterprises, operating as an invisible services fraud of a public
servant APPARENTLY IS BETTER EQUIPPED THAN THE PRIME MINISTER and his personal
team/advisers at 10 Downing Street. Marvel at the waffle from a button pushing automaton:
Visitors are urged to access the background to it all [*Link]
and recognise WHY IN OUR LETTER to the Rt. Hon. Frank Field MP, ex-Minister, we did point
to 'the facility for gross dereliction of Public Office through DELEGATION TO UNSUPERVISED
JUNIORS. And along come fraudsters club recruits promoting such rubbish as the above
letter (*Link to a challenge that was warranted
after such a charlatan denied us the right to a copy of the rubbish he was promoting).
ABOVE EVIDENCE of
letters and exchanges with Central Government in respect of the arrogant abuse of Public
Office FOR the imposition of the RAMPANT FRAUD on the citizens through abuse of the courts
facilities. BELOW a list of sites and pages where references to the law and such reports
to government and public servants - From Police to Ministers / Members of Parliament. In
our pages a challenge to assertions and proposed illegal activities by the UK section at
the ECoHR when they were caused to abandon proposed activities.
CRIMES - List
1. This Page - a letter
2. Letter by a Fraudster
3. A Conscious Fraudster
4. A Conniving Dreamer
5. Dr A. Adoko of same
For scanned letters:
PLEASE go back and finish the rest of the text you were
reading. Very important elements are covered.
OF THE CRIMINAL ACTIVITIES Organised By Public Servants & THE LEGAL CIRCLES.
Everything is permissible when it leads to theft of Properties & Denial of Rights,
that the Courts impose on 'the serfs' (List)
1. FORGERIES AT COURT
2. Housing Benefit FRAUD
3. Ditto with False Instrument
4. Ditto with Blunt Forgeries
5. Ditto Using Refugees
6. Ditto Relying on Judges
7. Ditto Daily Mail Acted after repetitious reports
8. Using Asylum Seekers
Revised: August 25, 2012. ADDED
: New introduction & links to the other pages + at Footnote 2 - introduced copy of a letter to the Home Secretary in 1993.
under re-construction with ongoing additions from new pages and links to and from pages
also to other web-sites
VISITORS ARE URGED to access and READ THE IMPORTANT update and ADDENDA we were obliged to introduce in January 2002. We had no
choice but to REPORT THE CRIMES TO THE TREASURY; our
observations and knowledge of the constructive frauds made us accessories if we kept
quiet, like the alleged victims who work towards the implementation of the schemes by the
abductors and rapists of Justice, the Goddess. You will find the addenda statement
at the top of the Updated Pages File. We are sure that you will share with us our concerns
and most profound disappointment at and with persons who adopt and promote activities
which they know are nothing but downright crimes. We refer to
our exclusive page where we expose (as conscientious law abiding citizens) the Confidentiality Between Fraudsters that
exists care of the BEST OPEN SECRET.
on Navigating through the extensive material: access
instructions. In the alternative IF looking for any specific issue/issues USE the search facility.
As part of the reconstruction process our new pages and pages
where changes and additions have been implemented, the improved / amended pages are
endorsed with the link 'Page Changes
and the date of the last changes. The
link takes visitors to a List of the changes implemented in the page. These include new
material and links from relevant paragraphs to other or new relevant material in
other pages. For further clarification email: webmaster@
The Home Office
and the Home
- Responsible for the security of and for the implementation of the rights in law assured to
ALL and 'for each individual citizen'.
- Rights secured through
Acts of Parliament and Security Guaranteed Under International Treaties and Accords, when
reported breached or violated, responsible for investigations leading to prosecutions, the
police UNDER SUPERVISION & GUIDANCE by the Home Office, the Home Secretary, the
Minister responsible for the implementation of the state's DUTIES & OBLIGATIONS to the
citizens. Responsible for the protection of the citizens who are called upon to pay taxes
for the performance of the aforesaid services to the taxpayers / electorate in any
civilised and properly constituted Democratic State. [*Link from here to the
principles upon which Democratic governance proper should be resting]
- Rights and Security to
person should be applied to all citizens, by Public Servants; indeed their retainers and
the law command that they do so and not as they determine through defaults, omissions and
as operatives / executives of CIUKU (Crimes
Incorporated UK Unlimited) Enterprises. (*F8)
- Duties and obligations
under the law should be adhered to by all other citizens, on the basic tenet that no one
shall violate the rights of any other. (*F2 - )
- We are to release
more evidence in respect of complaints, used only as promotional material by fraudsters
club recruits [*Link
from here to the cause and foundation for the
persons who fell in love with the system of operations as organised and managed by the
controllers of CIUKU Enterprises.
- One and all named and shamed /
exposed, by us, for ever promoting their alleged complaints & producing copies of such
to victims they target. The copies promoted as alleged deliveries to public servants, to
Ministers, as documents and pleadings lodged at court, etc.
- One and ALL asserting and
promoting obstructions by the system's operators who fail to grant or hinder hearings
- YET ALL RECKLESSLY IGNORING WITH
CONTEMPT THE JURY AT LARGE, the citizens of the world while complaining in private circles
about the failures of reporters and the media editors to report their complaints without
- MOST OFFENSIVE, however, THEIR OWN
SUPPRESSION OF THE TRUTH OF THE MATTERS they allegedly have been complaining about, while
using their alleged complaints as bait in order to suck and draw into the operations of
CIUKU Enterprises new intended / targeted for conversion to the system of operations they
fell in love with, victims of the legal circles and public servants.
[*Link from here to the 3
images of the letter, and from there to the content in HTML format, lower down this page,
for links to and from the text]
In 1993 the
letter below to the Home Secretary, the Rt. Hon. Michael Howard, with compliments to the
maligned we name and expose in our pages.
The content should clarify, to all
'fraudsters club recruits', that submissions and challenges to Ministers and successive
Lord Chancellors had been ongoing, long before the submissions, in 1995, that caused the
Leader of the Opposition, the Rt. Hon. Tony Blair and New Labour's Spokes Person on Legal
Affairs, in the House of Commons, the Rt., Hon. Paul Boateng, to acknowledge the element
of FRAUD IN THE LEGAL SYSTEM.
Every one we name and expose, set
about interfering in the background either as stooges who were / are acting on
instructions from the agents of the BLUNTLY ORGANISED & EXECUTED (through abuse of the
courts facilities) FRAUD ON THE TAXPAYERS, INTENDED TO LEAD, ALSO, TO THE CORRUPTION OF
NON-HUMANS, NON-THINKERS, the ill-educated and the ill-informed who act as slaves to their
own greed for silver and evil power over others. As typical 'sons of men' THEY ADOPTED THE
DIFFERENT TONGUES SCENARIO which the illiterate 'serfs', of the latter part of the 4th
century B.C., were in no position to recognise, as the targeted who were subjected and
conditioned to ongoing 'doctrine from above'.
The very doctrine from the
merchants of folly, the creators of the alleged Holy Scriptures they were promoting in
order to subjugate the 'sons of men', through the creation they first delivered to mankind
as an alleged translation to Greek, from their original which original was not presented
to mankind in the language of the craft-y fraudsters.
We shall be disclosing the
reasons, best known to the peddlers who never ceased promoting and creating alternative
'langiages : tongues' and scenarios / scripts aplenty for distribution to the ill-educated
and the ill-informed targeted... 'sons of men', .
Above and below evidence
relative to challenges and submissions to the elected 'representatives of 'the serfs' who
pay taxes for the retainer and maintenance of lousy actors in public office. All the while
'the serfs' : taxpaying suckers, are milked of 'the assets they create through labour and
honourable creative enterprise / ingenuity', by the parasites appointed and maintained, as
alleged servants of the public and the law : Public Servants. Also, in the forefront
misrepresented Social Services Operators who engineer and promote the creation of the
states which the Media Barons and the Intellectual Prostitutes they retain and maintain,
arrogantly promote as civilised societies.
- On the right, a letter and succinct submissions to the Home
Secretary in 1996, part of ongoing challenges attached to and arising as of the first
experiences when Solicitors, Barristers & Judges indulged in the creation, promotion
and USE of a FORGERY through which the intended milking of the cow and THE ARROGANT
CORRUPTION & BLUNT PERVERSION OF JUSTICE, ,
from within the legal services & THE COURTS. (*F6)
- All the while the criminal element, in control of and
supervising the activities of the disgraced Metropolitan police, contemptuously ignoring
the damages caused and imposed on 'the targeted serf'; one and all acting in contempt
of the provisions in national and international law. [*Link to a news article and acknowledgement
of the corrupt within the high and mighty abusers of office & trust]
Following on from the above stated criminal
activities, the imposition of allegedly legitimate legal costs for the intended / targeted
serf in contempt of an existing Court of Appeal ruling that was upheld by the House of
Lords as of 1939/1940. [*Link from here to Footnote 3 for very important information].
And Counsel responsible for the use of the BLUNT
FORGERY, rewarded with silk, made a QC within a short period. Subsequently appointed as a
High Court Judge sitting in Commercial cases.
- In short, the SYSTEM OF OPERATIONS : 'the
practitioners at their very best'.
- The icing on the cake, the subsequent PARTICIPATION IN THE SCAMS of abusers of public
office and services operating out of: (*Link
to footnote *F4 below, for the bank's first offence)
(a) the Inland Revenue,
[*Link to an
explicit letter to an accountant and note the implications in the matter of INEXCUSABLE
& FRAUDULENT DEMANDS by the Inland Revenue]
(b) the Local Authority maintaining the local police
who defaulted to bring about prosecution of the criminals,
(c) the Bank
(d) the Land Registry (*Link to footnote *F5
below for its officers undisclosed parts)
- In effect, the network spoken of, by
Christopher, to the late Stephen Knight when the latter was researching 'The Brotherhood'.
- issues of denial of rights & obstructions to unadulterated Justice the core elements
as submitted to the Home Secretary - Conservative
References to the right to record proceedings in court without any hindrance or
obstruction in order that Justice be seen to be done as the principle of OPEN COURTS
STIPULATES. [*Link to
who abused trust for his evil ends and those of
his mates; also other groups of fraudsters club recruits who fell in love with the
arrangements in place FOR RAMPANT FRAUD ON THE TAXPAYERS though abuse of the courts
facilities -* Link]
The above realities are but the practices
and the activities many complain of in private and or speak of to 'victims of the system'
whom they are pointed to (by the legal circles and their agents) and they target in order
to use them / put them on track FOR THE BENEFITS awaiting those who keep it all in the
family closet..... SUPPRESS IT ALL FROM THE TAXPAYERS!!! Such was and remains the
situation with those we are exposing, naming and shaming. Such, also, has been the state
with a multitude of others who seek to play the field as arranged by the legal circles and
alleged 'servants of the law and the public'. [*Link from here to a list of specific
paragraphs in pages where we cover the state of affairs]
The days of public
servants relying on the BLIND DEAF AND DUMB MEDIA ARE OVER. The days when ALL relied on BLIND DEAF AND DUMB officers within the law
enforcement agencies are also over. This is the age of FREE exchange of information and
THE unadulterated FACTS OF LIFE within all states, so long as their citizens are free to
exercise AS WE DO, their basic human-rights which ARE GUARANTEED under the European Convention
Rights . (ECoHR) [Below the introduction of the Human Rights Act. From here *Link
to HOW and under what circumstances the government was caused to announce the
introduction of the Act in 1997. When there read ALL of the appeal and the explicit
affidavit in the page]
The Human Rights Act was announced in
1997, presented subsequently to the Houses, debated and was added to the Statute
books in 1998.
- The attempts by Lord Irvine, the ex Lord
Chancellor, to create a supper Ministry WAS A DANGER TO DEMOCRACY and especially so, when
he was in charge of persons who were/are of the opinion that they were appointed, by
'their God' to be the modern day 'Lords and Masters' of 'the serfs', in this one's great
nation. [*Link from here
to the root of it all]
- We are in no doubt that such is the case in other lands, too. So long as our judges are free and shall remain free to indulge and
practice their corrupted law, unsupervised, unchecked, uncontrolled and acting, as they
please, in breach of the laws of our Parliament and in violation of human rights, Democracy
[*Link from here to
definition] is in mortal danger.
When the Act was introduced the promotional
& information literature that the government made available to the public, the
two Ministers responsible for the application of the law did get their heads together. The
preface page from the leaflet HRG1 10/2000, above, set the scene. It implied that the
rights of the citizens took precedent and the infighting' between the two Ministries was
to be relegated.
|[*Link from here to the
introduction to this page where we applied ourselves to more than the infighting].
the provisions of the European Convention on Human Rights (1948) we point to:-
Article 6.1. "In the determination of his civil RIGHTS and
or of any criminal charges against him, EVERYONE is entitled to a fair and public
hearing within a reasonable time by an independent and impartial tribunal ....
judgement shall be pronounced publicly but the press and public may be excluded
from all or part of the trial (hearing) in the interest of morals, public order or
national security in a democratic society ...interests of juveniles... protection of the
private life of the parties... where publicity would prejudice the interests of
justice." and under
Article 6.2. "EVERYONE charged with a criminal offence shall be presumed innocent
until proven guilty according to law." and under
Article 6.3. "EVERYONE.....
has the following minimum rights (a)
to be informed promptly.... in
detail ... nature and cause of charges against him .... (b) adequate
time,... facilities.. to prepare his defence.... (c) to defend himself in person or through legal
assistance of his own choosing free legal assistance in the interests of justice if he has
not sufficient means to pay... (d) to examine of have examined witnesses against him ..to obtain
attendance and examination of witnesses on his behalf under the same conditions as
witnesses against him; and (e) to
have the free assistance of an interpreter if he cannot understand or speak the language
use in court."
Article 8.1. "EVERYONE has the right to respect for his private and family
life, his home and his correspondence.
"THERE SHALL BE NO interference by a public authority with the exercise of this
right ..except in accordance with the law .. necessary in a democratic society..
interests of national security... public safety... economic well being of the country...
the prevention of disorder or crime... the protection of health or morals or for the
protection of the rights and freedoms of others." This is the most abused and breached piece of legislation by the
organisers and managers of the CIUKU Enterprises:-
- Our Masters and Lords seek
to, and impose many a criminal act.
- They do so through breaches of national law.
- By relying upon, and using the 'subordinates
created by the state'.
- Those subordinates, as Public Servants,
are also independent of the law - criminals'.
- They are assured, by the controllers of it
all, that 'No prosecutions are ever likely to be instigated, against them'.
- Just AS IN THE NATIONAL SCANDAL scenarios.Forgeries used for the theft of funds belonging to third
parties with plenty of FALSE INSTRUMENTS that lack accountability, as issued by persons in
- Officers of Law bluntly endorsing and
promoting the criminal activities of public servants.
- Collectively acting in contempt of the law
as authorised and licensed, by our representatives in government, to act so, for the
implementation of CRIMES INTENDED thus LEADING TO THE NEW CODE OF MORALS, hatched up in
secret sessions by the abductors of Democracy, attended by
the MEDIA barons and their editors.
- The theft and misappropriation of Housing
- Criminal activities in pursuit of organised multiple frauds on the public at large.
- Forgeries used
and no prosecutions because of the plan and the funds needed in order to create a melting
- All through arrogant interference in the
affairs of other countries.
- Criminals who steal from their masters (the
citizens / taxpayers) in allegedly civilised states, resting and founded allegedly on
principles of law and order.
- Public SERVANTS indulging in blunt crime at
the expense of their employers, Mr & Mrs Average.
- And they dare determine how other countries
and nations should run their own societies and affairs.
- Our Lords and Masters wishing to play
Godfather to the world.
- They are not simply interfering in other
- As part of their master plan, THEY ARE
BREAKING UP FAMILIES THROUGH ORGANISED FRAUDULENT ACTIVITIES in their own countries.(*Link to site for connection to family issues).
- Plenty of breaches of national law and gross
violations of international treaties and accords. [*Link to PLEADED VIOLATIONS as lodged at the
European Court of Human Rights]
- Criminal activities by the very guardians of
'the Law', OUR SERVANTS, who are retained by our representatives in government, persons
who are 'elected, care of the media barons, 'through frauds'.
- OUR AGENTS acting and operating in
government and states, which they misrepresent as alleged Democracies that, allegedly,
rest and are founded on law and order. Public servants, acting, as ABSOLUTE DICTATORS, in
contempt of all law and the rights of the citizens.
- They do it all through the media barons and
their stooges, with plenty of theatre, from 'intellectual
To the well known quote by Abraham Lincoln
we add, for the benefit of the abductors of Justice and Democracy, our founder's
'addenda', the fourth, dimension below:
- "You can fool all of the
people for some of the time".
- "You can fool some of the
people for all of the time".
- "You cannot fool all of the
people, all of the time".
- We add "AND
there are some people YOU can
never fool at any time".
Article 9. "EVERYONE has the right to freedom of thought, conscience
Article 10. "EVERYONE
has the right to FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION.... to HOLD OPINIONS...TO RECEIVE AND IMPART
INFORMATION AND IDEAS without interference by public authority and regardless of
frontiers..... (with provisions attached to ) maintaining the authority AND IMPARTIALITY
of the judiciary".
Article 11. "EVERYONE has the right of freedom of peaceful
assembly and to freedom of ASSOCIATION with others.... rights to form and join ...
for the protection of HIS INTERESTS".
Article 13. "EVERYONE whose rights and freedoms as set
forth in this Convention are violated SHALL have an effective remedy before a national
authority notwithstanding that the violation HAS BEEN committed by persons acting in an
Article 13 is VERY CLEAR. WHERE
IS THE NATIONAL AUTHORITY THAT LOOKS INTO THE VIOLATIONS judges in the United Kingdom
endorse, entertain AND INSTIGATE of their own? The question is simple and the Lord Chancellor with the Home Secretary should co-operate
and produce the formula under which the citizens CAN challenge activities that blatantly
breach national law and VIOLATE Human Rights. Converting the properties of others to
alleged legal costs attached to fraudulent court proceedings is the worst anathema the
United Kingdom is plagued with. One could not expect a clearer and more succinct a
situation of abuses of court 'facilities' than in the Geoffrey Harold Scriven cases. WE
have other cases on file. Where is the authority to investigate and prosecute the
SUCCESSIVE GOVERNMENTS HAVE BEEN ACTING IN CONTEMPT of the provision, allegedly signed for
by OUR REPRESENTATIVES IN GOVERNMENT, as our agents on behalf of the Head of State, the
king / queen. We now ask you to READ OF THE, undisclosed &
unpublicised, ARRANGEMENTS IN PLACE, whereby judicial chair occupants ARE USED in order
to impose the state of dictatorships that the founder of
human-rights.org first spoke and wrote of, over 34 years ago. Such has been the case
in ALL pseudo-democracies where Intellectual Prostitutes* [*Link
to definition] are maintained by the invisible string pullers (of puppets) and
manipulators (of puppets) in order to misinform the ill-educated 'serfs' and 'shitizens',
NON-THINKERS who ARE SUBJECTED to permanent brain washing and subliminal indoctrination as
organised by the evil ones who have been in control of ALL pseudo-democracies for
centuries and NOW SEEK TOTAL CONTROL OF PLANET EARTH).
Article 14. "The
enjoyment of the rights and freedoms set forth in this Convention shall be secured without
discrimination on any grounds such as sex, race, colour, language, religion, political or
other opinion, national or social origin, association with a national minority, property,
birth or other status."
|Many the 'victims of the system' who complain of contempt to their complaints, by the authorities and officials, who
invariably express their attitude and mentality to it all, through 'failures to
acknowledge or respond to / deal with the complaints diligently and as the law provides. [*Link from here
to a list of absolute essential provisions, warranted in and for the proper management of
States that constitute true Democracies]
- On the right, print of an explicit
document Andrew attached / attaches ALWAYS at the top of any submissions intended for
officials, head of government department, Minister, posted to and or delivered by hand.
Victims can copy the document and use it as part of submissions & CHALLENGES
they direct to named (always individuals). We invite all to use such elements as their
first steps if, werv stress, IF THEY SEEK RECOVERY of any stolen rights and assets when
contempt of evidence and the law was part of the illegal activities they were / asre
victims of. (*F7)
- We request of visitors, readers and
researchers to access the page, the 'background' to it all. The *Link from here takes visitors to a statement founded and
resting on assertions and promotions that always are disseminated and promoted through the
media, to the taxpaying 'serfs', from the offices of politicians, in particular
persons who hold Ministerial office after some questionable activities surface or are
- We publish below, in the left margin
window, copy of a letter received from the Prime Minister's private office in December
1999. We publish also copy of a letter from Mr Andrew Yiannides, who thanked the Prime
Minister for forwarding the submissions and the evidence (received by the Prime Minister)
to the Home Secretary because the matters reported to the Prime Minister pertained to
criminal activities. [*Link
to the two images / letters in the left margin / window]
- Genuinely concerned citizens, serious
readers and researchers should use this next *link and
read of the steps taken in order to ensure that 'eventually, matters reported to the Prime
Minister were referred, by him and his private office at 10 Downing Street, to the right
Minister, the Home Secretary.
- We point to the fact that a junior public
servant, at the Home Office, DECIDED that the Prime Minister and his private office staff,
erred. Apparently the junior was better equipped in law than the Prime Minister and his
staff. The Home Office junior, therefore re-directed the submissions and the material to
the Lord Chancellor's Department.
- We telephoned the Prime Minister's office
and queried the action of the Home Office post room junior. We never heard from the Prime
Minister's office on the developments and in the circumstances we simply assumed that the
question in the background to it all page, had benefited from the correct reply /
conclusion 25 years earlier.
Combating the usual promotions and
arrangements for the protection of irresponsible Ministers, who always assert 'failures by
their subordinates to inform them (Ministers) of any and ALL serious issues reported to,
and intended FOR the attention of the Ministers, as was the case with Mr Yiannides'
submissions to the Rt. Hon. Frank Field when in Ministerial Office.
Above, we refer and point to the
practice of using and blaming juniors / subordinates for failing to inform (allegedly),
the irresponsible in high office. Through such inexcusable promotions they would have all
citizens believe (such be their intentions) that 'juniors are running the country. In the
letter we publish, below, references to such issues to the Rt. Hon. Frank Field MP. When,
Minister, his staff and office failed to acknowledge submissions posted for HIS PERSONAL
ATTENTION after he was instructed by the Prime Minister to 'think the unthinkable'. [*Link from here
to the page where we publish an explicit letter and relate the blunt fraudulent activities
instigated and taken to fruition by and through alleged servants of the public]
|Below in HTML (for links
to and from) the letter that CAUSED the government to act. Read it, access the facts and
the evidence pointed to the Member of Parliament (ex-Minister) and then read the article,
by the Home Secretary, we reproduce below.
FULL TEXT OF THE LETTER to the Rt. Hon. Frank Field MP
29th April 2003
The Rt. Hon. Frank Field MP
House of Commons
London - SW1A 0AA
My Ref.: A03EATTP
Your Ref.: ‘Think /Do the unthinkable’ brief.
Re: Human Rights and the duties of Ministers / MPs in a Democratic State
I beg to refer you to my letter of 18th December 1998,
published in the public domain at:
(URL changes as of March 2006 to http://www.uk-human-rights.org)
The above letter was posted to the Rt. Hon. Jack Straw, Home Secretary
at the time. On that occasion it was noted that the government acted promptly.
The stated facts of life, relative to our pseudo-democracy, as covered
in our pages, are clear. The realities and realisations to the point. Included, in the
stated facts, references to letters that I was caused to send, to you, in connection with
the rampant fraud and corruption covered in our pages. The Free-For-All organised,
always, by Public(!) Servants(?). Crimes seen to be endorsed and acquiesced,
through blunt defaults from and by other public(!) Servants(?). The latter retained and
maintained by other Public(!) Servants(?) to serve the citizens by applying their presumed
knowledge of law to the facts known or stated to them and or raised with / brought to the
attention of such Public(!) Servants(?).
The references to the letters that were sent to you can be accessed in
the same page/web-site file at:
acts (URL changes as of March 2006 to http://www.uk-human-rights.org)
I will appreciate an acknowledgement to this letter, by return post. A
response proper, as soon as possible, is deemed essential because of the serious issues
that my enquiries, now, and the matters that my communications, past and present, raised
and raise with you. Indeed, others in public office, during, before and after my original
submissions to you, personally, received substantial information and documented evidence
in support of my submissions.
Please note that as part of the preparations for the publication of the
facts of life, in the public domain, and the raising of the issues of ‘who are
responsible for the rampant fraud and corruption through contempt of all law, as Public(!)
Servants(?) indulge’, an explicit practice and ploy is pointed to by me, in the
pages published by and at *human-rights*.
In respect of other facts, realities and convenient arrangements
(pointed to by me at *human-rights*) I wish to enquire of you, if you are aware or
were informed of the fact that the victims of the ‘Arms to, and for, Iraq’ fiasco:
including the costly theatrical productions (court presentations), the torment and torture
(through the court proceedings / charges / allegations) imposed on the victims of
Public(!) Servants(?) received compensation, not long ago, running into millions of pounds
sterling? ALL AT THE EXPENSE OF THE PUBLIC PURSE – the taxpayer : Mr & Mrs Average!
The succinct and explicit realities covered in the page:
[URL changes as of March 2006 to http://www.uk-human-rights.org]
and the fundamental realities / practices covered in the other explicit
(URL changes as of March 2006 to http://www.uk-human-rights.org)
led to the submissions last year to:
- The Treasury
- The Prime Minister
- The Home Secretary
And the submissions are covered at:
(URL changes as of March 2006 to http://www.uk-human-rights.org)
I am preparing for the release and publication, in the public domain,
of the acknowledgement by the government in waiting in 1995, relative to THE SERIOUS ISSUE
OF FRAUD IN THE LEGAL SYSTEM. I feel it my duty to draw your attention to the aforesaid
facts. You were acting for the government you represent, at the time of my submissions to
you. It is, therefore, incumbent upon me to enquire of you and to seek assistance, from a
Minister who was caused to resign, in order that I may present a clearer picture on the
issue of the melting pot. The criminal activities, by persons who ‘arrange world events’
through secret meetings and undeclared by government policies, lead to the citizens being
defrauded of their properties and their rights in law. The activities also lead to the
taxing of Mr & Mrs Average for the experiments in social restructuring by non-elected
‘criminally motivated / trained / tutored’ individuals, who abuse public office.
I need only remind you that the victims of such public(!) servants(?)
have families and offspring to care for. The citizens also have the inalienable right to
plan for their futures and those of their children. The criminal activities that we cover
in our pages, endorsed and acquiesced, as these are through the courts, amount to nothing
short of ‘’. When an elected government turns a
blind eye and or ears to the evidence that no one can shove in his/her private or family
closets, nor shove it all under the carpets of the salons the offending public(!)
servants(?) frequent, the issue of:
'WHEN WILL THE GOVERNMENT that made promises
in 1995 [*Link] put an end to
the abuse / use of the courts for the imposition of ‘the creeping dictatorship’,
that I recognised as long ago as 1972/1975? The background and the evidence to/for
the conclusions, then, is published at:
(URL changes as of March 2006 to http://www.uk-human-rights.org)
instrument published in the page, was made even falser after the criminals ‘goofed’.
It was created / procured years after the events that led to the institution of court
proceedings. The architects (legal circles) with the defaulting public(!) servants(?),
(the police and judicial chair abusers) established beyond any doubt the rampant fraud and
corruption through the courts. The Lords & Masters mentalities towards the citizens (‘subjects’
to the whims of the corrupters of societies) whom the offending public(!) servants(?)
treat as serfs of the Middle Ages, was also born out of those events. I draw your personal
attention to the fact that Lord Jeffrey Archer ended up behind bars while the architect
and promoter of a false instrument FOR THE PERVERSION & CORRUPTION OF JUSTICE was
rewarded with silk and subsequently appointed to ‘judicial chair occupancy’. With
criminals in judicial chairs how can any government that knows of or becomes aware of ‘the
facilities at / through the courts for RAMPANT FRAUD AND CRIMES ENDORSED BY THE LAW
ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES justify or assert ‘government founded and resting on law and order’?
Your response proper on the issue of the submissions that were ignored by your office
/ private staff (you?) are deemed essential. In the event that some subordinate or junior
may be presumed responsible for suppression of my letters to you, I request that you
access the page:
(g) http://www.uk-human-rights.org/background.htm (URL changes as of
March 2006 to http://www.uk-human-rights.org)
There, the questions (in
red): "WHO governs ? And How ?"
Also: Is the answer
"Through Juniors and dereliction of Public Duty ?"
Founder / President
|READ BELOW the article that
was published within days in the London Evening Standard.
Consider our submissions above to the
MP, Frank Field Esq. ex-Minister who had been caused to resign years earlier.
The first letter we pointed to above should
also be read by ALL who access this site.
Every considerate human (thinking and
feeling animal) should then consider WHERE BE THE DELIVERY OF JUSTICE to the British
people, the taxpayers as we have been demanding for decades?
Can any housewife who does not keep a clean
home, ever really assert or assume the right 'to clean up another's home'?.
FOOD FOR THOUGHT, dear
Members of Parliament. Cease all manifestation inherent in puppets and act as the
representatives of the citizens and not as the manipulated 'slaves of the operators who
organise and control CIUKU Enterprises.
Evening Standard Monday, 12 May 2003
The Home Secretary
has irked the judiciary by seeking stricter sentences for murder. Here he insists that
courts must take more notice of the public
I won't give in
announcement of new sentences for murders – so that life means life – provoked the
latest wave of media coverage on my so-called war on the judges". I can see why. It
is easy to caricature any disagreement as the hot-tempered working-class Sheffield boy
taking on an icy-cool retired judge pontificating from his Surrey drawing room.
Yet I am
not "at war" with judges, barristers or the rest of the legal profession. I
believe strongly in a politically independent judiciary, the rule of law and due process.
But I also believe in Parliament and a healthy democracy where people vote in elections
because their vote can make a difference to the world they live in, through the
politicians they elect. Surely it is possible to have a strong and lively debate about how
Parliament and the judiciary fit together without it always being portrayed as a brawling
not some dry debate in Westminster. Confidence in our criminal justice system is at an
all-time low. Public respect for judges, politicians and lawyers alike is equally low. Up
and down the country the experience of victims and witnesses is too often a poor one where
they are treated as bit-players in a system which sees process as being more important
than justice, where technicalities are more important than the truth.
politicians make these points we are not seeking to wind up the legal profession for
the sake of it. We are doing our job and speaking up for the public we serve. There are no
newspaper editors, columnists or opinion formers living in my inner-city Sheffield
constituency. If I don't speak about the experiences of my constituents and millions like
them, they have no voice at all in the public arena.
WANT to improve this situation and to get reform in the criminal justice system
that brings the legal profession with us. To do this, we need a long hard look at the
constitutional relationship between Parliament and the judges and be clear how it has
relationship has changed beyond all recognition over the past 30 years, thanks to the
use of judicial review - the process by which an individual can ask the court to overturn
the effect or implementation of a law on their individual circumstance. Judges now
routinely use judicial review to rewrite the effects of a law that Parliament has passed.
isn't just my view, it is endorsed by some of the most distinguished legal minds in
the country. Professor Sir William Wade - the author of Administrative Law – has
written: "The judges have established judicial review as an almost boundless
jurisdiction over almost every kind of governmental activity". Lord Beloff QC has
said that the activities of the judiciary have infringed the sovereignty of
Beloff also points out that in the 1950s, judicial review was confined to fewer than
100 cases a year relating to maladministration of government.
there are thousands of cases every year in every field of commerce; construction,
aviation, and IT, all inviting lawyers and judges to find ever more ingenious ways of
getting what they want from the law Parliament has passed.
this have been a rash of high-profile cases brought under the 1998 Human Rights Act
which incorporated the European Convention on Human Rights into British law.
believe most of these cases would have ended up in Strasbourg anyway, if we had not
taken the step of building the ECHR into our legal system. But it has undoubtedly
encouraged some in the legal profession to see a further way of rendering ineffective laws
they don't like.
area, the impact of judicial review has been most visible in several high profile
asylum cases on fast-track claims at the Oakington centre and cash payments for late
cases, the Home Office eventually won the legal arguments but not before a major
tussle which resulted in plenty of premature headlines about our reforms being squashed.
perceptions are vital to the health of our democracy. If people believe that
Parliament has no power or influence and that whatever promises we make will eventually
fail, how can we persuade people to vote, stand for elections and be involved in
have to believe that Parliament genuinely speaks for them if they are to vote, and
this can't be done if large parts of the legal system believe that it can seek to undo
Acts of Parliament without any consequences for the health of our democracy.
not the same as saying that public opinion, however raw, should become law which is
the way some commentators have interpreted my murder sentencing principles. Parliament's
lawmaking process is usually a year of intense deliberation over finely worded,
complicated pieces of legislation. This is the job of work which MPs and peers do, day in,
to move away from a stand-off mentality in which parts of the legal profession respond
to politicians with a "what's it to do with you?" attitude. I honestly believe
that most lawyers and judges do want to see justice, not just procedural Pyrrhic
that, too, as well as a system where judges can interpret the laws which have been
clearly set out by a democratically elected Parliament.
moment, we all too often have the worst of all worlds in which
Parliament deliberates for months over laws which are then systematically undermined by
overly aggressive judicial review decisions. There is a way forward here. The legal
profession must embrace reform of the criminal justice system, not carp from the
sidelines. Like most people, I respond better to an honest dialogue than to being shouted
relationship between the judges, barristers and politicians has to recognise our
mandate as public representatives and not treat public opinion as something inherently
disdainful which has no role in the formulation of law.
have to pause and draw breath at the scale and scope of judicial review and
interpretations of the Human Rights Act if we are not to have spat after spat about the
mature, clear legal system* is one of the foundations of a democratic
society. We all have a responsibility not to destroy the ground all of us want to stand
We have to move away from a stand-off
in which parts of the legal profession
respond to politicians with
`What's it to do with you?' [*Link from here to Footnote - reality]
© Associated Newspapers UK
London Evening Standard – May 2003
point to the NOTICE* (*image above) and request of
thiunkers to consider as to HOW & WHY the article, above
|* We point visitors, readers and researchers to the extract
from Isocrates' Aeropagiticos* [*L] and we urge ALL
VICTIMS OF THE ABUSED PUBLIC SERVICES snd more specifically the reliance of all ('alleged
servants of ther public and ther law') on abusers of judicial chair occupation, to
ACCESS & READ the extracts we point to from the most vile of works ever to have been
misrepresented to mankind where one reads of who and what for the creation of judges seen
to be engaging in all manner of vile (anagram of evil) impositions on the
sucker-sersf who have taxes imposed on them for the maintenance of criminals in public
office* (*L1). Also who and what elements / powers behind the divide and manipulate
'the sucker-serfs' (the sons -NO daughters- of men -NO women-) as created
for and promoted through 'the scripts and scenarios : the teachings by examples stated for
the followers and implementers of the evil plans for mankind as created by the criminals
who concocted the vile work and delivered it to Ptolemy of Egypt some 2300 years ago under
specific circumstances which the criminals who sety out to become Lords & Masters of
all and everything through their succesors and followers have suppressed, buried in the
caves from whence they emerged as the assailants of a targeted civilisation.
Below a House of Lords ruling that
could not possibly have ignored the principles covered in domestic and in international
Law, Conventions, Treaties & Accords, which our representatives
in governments introduce and or subscribed to, ON BEHALF OF THE CITIZENS, from time
to time. Such
realisations from within an alleged Democracy. One that is sold to the world by the
abductors, of the very Goddess, the media barons with their stooges, the editors acting as
blind deaf and dumb monkeys or as the Intellectual Prostitutes
that an insider spoke of, when he was moving out of the firing line. The offenders attend
conspiratorial & secret meetings with self-appointed Gods who have no scruples or an
ounce of morals among them. All preach to others that which they, as sycophants and
hypocrites, do not adhere to. [*Link]
We refer and draw attention to the simple fact
that IN ESSENCE only the whole, of any publication, evinces THE PURPOSE & INTENT
OF the AUTHOR and CONTRIBUTORS TO the publication. That aside, the MORE IMPORTANT
ELEMENT (for victims of the free-for-all as practised in the courts and by the courts'
service) IS THE ISSUE OF CONTEMPT FOR STATUTORY LAW covering the criminal activities,
indulged into or entertained by judicial chair occupants. Reference to 'THE WHOLE' IS
COVERED in the Court of Appeal report in the lower part of the scan, of 'The Times' Law
Report. DO NOTE the words:- ".....in a reference by the Home Secretary
under.....". DO refer to the four letters (images) we publish in the exclusive page / file where
'promoters of the practices from within the Law Enforcement Agencies are exposed. The
promoters DO NOT CHALLENGE the criminal activities and they decline or FAIL to provide
copies of any letters they PROJECT & PROMOTE with arrogant affront & intent in
contempt of the law. THUS THEY ARE SEEN / ACT as PROMOTERS of WAFFLE & or FALSE
ASSERTIONS even letters by the POLICE, etc. They do so WITH INTENT in order that new
victims swallow such ill-directed and maligned promotions as a fait accompli situations.
They do so only as converts to and supporters of the rampant fraud through abuse of the
courts facilities. Such persons ACT ONLY FOR THE
OF THE VERY CANCEROUS GROWTH INDUSTRY they set off, as complaining victims of the
practices / criminal activities. When challenged they revert to crocodile tears and as
lousy actors they expose the plans they serve after joining THE
FRAUDSTERS' CLUB. We point you to the 4 letters you should read and we request that
you consider THE FACT that the PROMOTED, by alleged victims, of the ASSERTIONS from the
police, were denied by the Lord Chancellor's Office. *Link from here to the images of the letters we publish for your
benefit and read the introduction to the page and the letters. *Link from here to the page where we expose the
arrangements for organised fraud & corruption through the courts and recognise why we
maintain that the rampant fraud in and through the legal system / courts / Law Enforcement
Agencies, rests on such activities. Parties to the Constructive FRAUDS the POLICE, FOR
WHICH parties THE HOME SECRETARY / HOME OFFICE ARE RESPONSIBLE. Consider the validity
of the fourth quote, you can access from here, our Home Page,
in view of the arrangements in place by the judiciary (amounting to invisible services to
criminals and or resting on undeclared policy and plans for the taxpayers, in an alleged
democracy). The words are as clear and as blunt as can be, gracing most of our pages
because of the implications no one could possibly ignore. The arrogant and illegal, as far
as the law goes, assertions by the judiciary to deny and obstruct justice to the citizens
especially when public servants / government officials indulge, access from
here the illegal provision created by the judiciary and lodge complaints to your
representative (MP & EMP) in government.
|Submissions, to the Home Secretary in
1993, relevant to criminal activities, by alleged servants of the Law & the Public,
who acted in contempt of the law - National & International - as persons who are not
subject to the laws that apply to the rest of society in an allegedly civilised &
Democratic state / country.
Honourable Member of Parliament
Michael Howard Esq.
House of Commons
My Ref.: CJEGSO93
Your Ref.: Minorities/fact finding missions
25th October 1993
Your recent statements as regards tensions
and emotions which rest on attitudes and mentalities that produced East London marchers
and confrontations are admirable and indeed a step in the right direction
I would be failing myself, my family and my
neighbours if not other citizens, if I did not submit to you the attached extract from a
case history of true events which you should, and I implore you to, read without fail.
You will note, that in a simple matter of
breach of contract between two persons of different backgrounds and origins, elements
which subsequently entered into the arena were simply introduced, perpetrated, promoted
and even worse furtherance of such mentalities and attitudes were attempted to by none
other than those upon whom society at large seeks and relies for their rights in law, both
National and international.
Sir, at the County Court, where the
documents (Public Records) are filed, in the Defence and Counter Claim which was the only
avenue open to me (after I was denied and obstructed by a young policeman the address
proper of the offending building contractor) I clearly pleaded the fact that my family and
I happen to live in the same road as the brother in law of that offending building
contractor. And our relationship has been nothing else but that of good neighbours,
never marred even by the events arising out of Court proceedings and the mentality and
attitudes of the police, Court staff and Officers.
In letters, subsequently sent to my Member
of Parliament I raised the serious issues of denial of rights and the repeated attempts to
deny and obstruct Justice in furtherance of the young police constable’s blatant
favouritism and the introduction of racial discrimination. The acts and mentality of the
police constable were pleaded in my Defence and Counter Claim without making him party to
the proceedings and or any claim having been made in respect of those causes of action. It
was a deliberate and by necessity calculated act on my part, because of past failures by
the police to exercise their Public Duties without any hint of favouritism and or
discrimination. The sole purpose of my pleadings was meant to indicate and state to the
Court as to how a contract gone sour was turned into something of an abhorrent nature and
outside the law by none others but those who are meant to enforce the Law and protect the
citizens. Sir, you will not fail to note the obvious and blatant attempts, by those who
are meant to uphold and apply Parliament’s Laws and the State’s Commitments to the
International Community. They, in their turn, sought to promote the initial acts and
Breaches of Public Duty by a Public Servant in furtherance of their own in order to
create conditions upon which that young police constable might or could have been forgiven
and or absolved of any responsibility by his failures and his blatant abuse of
public office in furtherance of his personal own choices and in contravention of the
Sir, if public servants see fit to act as
the persons depicted in the submitted true and factual case history, and their
respective Superiors do themselves ignore the complaints raised and made of the respective
departments; and it is immaterial if there exist loopholes and or break-downs in the
line of commands but there subsists nothing but dereliction of Public Duty where
and how does the average citizen seek redress IF THOSE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE ADMINISTRATION
OF LAW AND ORDER ARE THEMSELVES GUILTY of such acts?
Sir, it was indeed remarkable that a
Parliamentary Secretary to the Lord Chancellor's Department, in a reply to my Member of
Parliament, sought to cover up the failures of County Court staff and officers with the
utterances that my complaints were allegedly investigated WHILST ELECTING TO IGNORE THE
EXISTENCE OF SOUND RECORDINGS; I was not informed that I was to be treated as I was; so
why should I fore-warn anybody?
I would like to add, that even though I
did reverse an improper1y entered judgement against me and eventually judgement was
entered for me, nonetheless the culprit and rogue contractor HAD AND DID THREATEN ME, MY
WIFE AND OUR CHILDREN. He did indulge in criminal acts AFTER HE HAD BEEN ENCOURAGED BY THE
YOUNG POLICEMAN. Only a fool would put his life, his family and his properties at risk
BECAUSE THE POLICE FAILED TO PROSECUTE THE PERSON THEY TOOK UNDER THEIR WING AND
ENCOURAGED THROUGHOUT. So what use is a judgement against a person who appears to had been
guided and motivated into criminal acts because of encouragement by those who ought to
OUR LAW ENFORCING AGENCIES!
May I add that in so far as there exist
reasons advanced and promoted by those in charge of our L.E.A’s that our Judiciary are
and should be Independent, that THAT INDEPENDENCE SHOULD BE NOTHING ELSE BUT INDEPENDENCE
TO ENTER AND MAKE JUDICIOUS DECISIONS founded and resting on the facts of each case and in
furtherance of Law Enforcement. NOT INDEPENDENCE TO INDULGE IN LAW BREAKING. In a letter
to my M.P years ago I stated, "Evidently if a judge be drunk, in charge of a
vehicle, going through red traffic lights, causing an accident with damages to properties
and loss of life, that judge CAN BE PROSECUTED. But if drunk with the powers of his
position HE CANNOT!". Also in a letter to the Lord Chancellor I stated, "Can
you imagine the state of British Industry if one and all were free to indulge and left to
their own devices, unsupervised and uncontrolled?" Is the only remedy open to
the public, Appeals Galore And By The Score all the way to Strasbourg, provided the
citizen aggrieved has funds and millions to spend with, on and in questionable Legal
Services, who after all appear to be nothing else but self perpetuating Law Breakers. AND
I HAVE EVIDENCE (all overseas) which the Police ignore whilst the Director of Public
Prosecutions and his department state that it is a matter for the police. PASS THE BUCK!
I look forward to your response to my
letter and your reactions to the facts related in The Breeding Grounds Case. Years ago,
after I was taken to the cleaners (so to speak) through corrupt and criminal abuses of our
Legal System, I decided that the only true remedy for the public at large was to expose
the practices and the systematic abuses by the legal circles through a book, hence the use
of the word case. (there are others) Of recent times two dear old ladies, Miss Mary Winch
and Miss Peggy Wood have had their tribulations, at the hands of our Legal System, aired
by the media. I do feel that it is time some Senior Officers and or Minister particularly
your office Sir, took the matters, which I and many others have been raising for many
years, to task.
As to the matters raised because of
failures and the conscious acts by those responsible for the welfare and well being
of all citizens irrespective of race, creed and or colour, may I now raise a
question with you and your office, Honourable Sir, If such persons sought to act in the
manners that they did (at least those in the stated case) towards me, a person of white
Christian European origins, what of their mentality and attitude towards the citizens of
other origins? And who and how, if not from your office, are we to stop the promotion if
not the escalation of the events in East London when there appears to exist no real desire
to stop at source since those upon whom society at large relies, do themselves fail
society and themselves indulge in law breaking?"
65 Abbot's Park Road
London E1O 6HU
Attach Copy of extracts from ‘The Breeding
In October 2010, the coalition's Attorney General, in an interview
published by 'COUNSEL' specifically spoke of the police distancing themselves
from cases of (small-fry) fraud and asserted that he was
making that element his department's priority. IT REMAINS TO BE SEEN, WHAT the
coalition of the Con-LibDems, THE GOVERNMENT OF THE DAY WILL IN FACT ATTEND TO THE RAMPANT
FRAUD, and IF IT WILL DEAL with the criminals who abuse public office, especially
when faced with appropriate submissions and claims that will be delivered in due course.
Visitors/readers are urged to read the article published in the London Evening Standard,
as settled by the Rt. Hon. David Blunkett, Home Secretary in 2003 [*Link from here
to the article we reproduce in another webpage and consider "Why tolerate the
arrogance of the legal circles who had and have the audacity to assert to the lawmakers
that the y, the lawmakers have nothing to do with the law"]. While there, above it, the explicit letter to
ex-Minister, the Rt. Hon. Frank Field MP, delivered a few days earlier. ALL alleged
victim-challengers who contacted Andrew Yiannides, by the time the letter was sent to the
Minister, received copy of the letter just as they received copies of other letters
submitted to government maintained Ministers and other official appointees to public
office. Accessing the material pointed to from the letter (URLs) is of utmost importance.
It should assist 'recognition of the citizen's rights at work', when called upon properly
in truly democratic states. The above in 2003; there were other 'submissions' and among
such civilised and, within the law, approaches by citizens that led to the right actions
by governments, the explicit challenges when we set about exposing one of the most evil of
alleged victims of the legal circles to have ever contacted us [*Link to our explicit submissions to (a) the Prime
Minister, (b) the Chancellor / Treasury, (c) the Home Secretary. WE acted so after we had
secured more than enough evidence about the parts of an alleged victim whose only
interests were (i) the rewards under the table FOR KEEPING QUIET about the ORGANISED FRAUD
THROUGH ABUSE OF THE COURTS' FACILITIES and (ii) her parts in blunt attempts that were
intended to discredit the person she was sent along to mess about with, Mr Andrew
Yiannides]. Access please the
letter to the Home Secretary, the Rt. Hon. Jack Straw, in December 1998 [*Link*
[*L] from here to the letter] and note the results
evinced in the newspaper article (Hornsey Journal) also within days of the letter reaching
its destination. Many the charlatans and stooges -lovers and 'promoters of the system as is'- on the
job for decades; one and all acting as sold souls always do [*Link [*L] from here to the evidence we
point to relative to the parts of one of a number of sold to the system fraudsters who
were sent along / introduced to Andrew Yiannides by the managers / organisers of the LIPS
crowd / mob].
It is imperative the reader /
visitor realises that the issues we cover and point to are very simple, in ALL GENUINE
DEMOCRATIC STATES. The citizens elect persons they wish to represent them in government.
The REPRESENTATIVES OF THE CITIZENS (do access the words of
Oliver Cromwell when he dismissed the deputies of the people) THEN CREATE LAW recorded as
Acts of Parliament. The very Acts and Statutory Instruments (the latter are issued by
Ministers) are intended TO PROTECT THE CITIZENS FROM CRIME & CRIMINALS and to assure /
guarantee to citizens THEIR RIGHTS (do access a simple compilation
of the most fundamental of rights for genuine democratic states). THE LEGAL PROFESSIONS
AND THE COURTS / JUDICIARY are meant TO SERVE THE CITIZENS BY APPLYING THEIR KNOWLEDGE OF
THE LAW, in accordance with the facts stated and proven
as true and relevant to any case and complaint raised in the first instance or before a
court of law. Visitors, readers and researchers are urged to access the words of the French
Jurist, Charles Louis Montesquieu in the quotes page.
When in the page all should scroll up and access the words attributed to Jesus Christ by
the creators / editors of the New Testament (circa early 4th Century Anno Domini). Mankind
benefited from wise counsel through the promotion of the realities attributed to Jesus
Christ some 1700 years ago. Such indeed was the case also in the 6th century BC; access
and READ of Justice as of then, by scrolling up to Aeschylus.
2. The principle from which visitors, readers &
researchers are directed here (from above), with our complements to the corrupted. To all
converts 'to the system as is'; to the lovers of the constructive frauds on the
taxpayers which realities we cover in the exclusive page we point to from here. Access and read of the realities we expose
and consider, as taxpayers, the arrogant fraud on the taxpayers; consider also, that NOT
ONE OF THE ALLEGED VICTIM-CHALLENGERS WE NAME IN OUR PAGES, ever addressed the organised
fraud on the taxpayers. Every one we name and expose in our pages, also MANY OTHER
ALLEGED CHALLENGER-VICTIMS, defaulted, not for fear of repercussions, but because NONE
WISHED OR DESIRED TO DRAW ATTENTION TO THE FACILITIES THEY FELL IN LOVE WITH, as converts
to it all and as maintenance engineers / users of 'the system as is'; precisely what has
been the case with the persons we name and expose.
3. The case referred to in the
introduction to the Home Office responsibilities (above) was used in pleadings at the High
Court (RCJ). The submissions were lodged for and in respect of the case of a targeted 'son
of some man', a discarded dildo. Find out how and under what circumstances we referred to
the 'stated case' in the course of Mr Len Miskulin's tribulations. He elected to vanish
into obscurity but somehow either he or some other has been maintaining the web-site he
set up in order to challenge and expose those who imposed on him their evil ways, the
torment and torture he was being subjected to, by the legal circles who always use
'gestation vessels' (motherhood) as their reasons for 'acting in contempt of THE PRINCIPLE
OF THE ASSURED, in International Law, EQUALITY OF THE SEXES. Access from here the explicit
challenges and submissions that were lodged at court. The PRECEDENT CASE AS STATED /
PLEADED and pointed to, to the court and to the abusers of the courts' processes should
assist victims of the rampant fraud through the courts to recognise WHY as long ago as
1981, Mr Andrew Yiannides was advocating the creation of the Citizens' Alternative
Precedent case records - data for use by the citizens who have had enough of the
theatrical productions from and by abusers of the courts facilities and indulge as we
expose in the exclusive page [*Link] where we address the element of the sold to the devil souls.
4. The bank's
participation in ORGANISED CRIMES AGAINST THE CITIZENS (pardon, just another 'serf'
in the instance at hand) was discovered decades later. The bank's officers were party to an undisclosed, unjustified and
inexcusable charge on a property by the fraudsters operating out of the Inland Revenue.
The undisclosed, by the bank, charge by the Inland Revenue was entered, by the IR, on top
of a fraudulent, in essence, and inexcusable demand by the Inland Revenue. Victims of
Inland Revenue malpractice, readers and researchers should *Link from here to a letter sent to an accountant many
decades later AFTER THE CHARGE WAS DISCLOSED by and uncovered in the course of a visit to
the Land Registry as deposed of on affidavit, the execution of which the deponent
delayed, with intent, for almost four years.
5. Reference above
(Footnote number 4) to an undisclosed charge on a property, relates to a charge which
officers of Lloyds Bank plc., as trusted holders of the Deeds to the property, allowed. No
'decent human' (thinker who is given the full facts and the background) can possibly
ignore the fact that the agents and officers of Lloyds Bank plc.CONVENIENTLY FAILED TO
DISCLOSE, to the victim-serf, THE CHARGE BY THE INLAND REVENUE. The Manager in charge of
the branch handling the accounts of the targeted victim-serf was fully aware of the
criminal activities the legal circles indulged in at the client's expense. The Bank,
through the Manager's records, were aware of the plans of the victim-serf, because he was
kept informed throughout of such matters. There existed substantive reasons why the
victim-serf did not proceed with the removal of the first charge by the bank after the
loan account that warranted the charge, by the bank, was paid off. The bank was in the
position of trust and the UNDISCLOSED CHARGE must have been behind other questionable acts
by other bank managers, almost two decades later. At the time of the questionable
activities by the staff and officers of Lloyds-TSB plc, new judicial chair occupants had
entered the scenarios through an orchestrated and organised assault, on the family the
victim-serf had created and maintained for years. All in good time, fellow victims of the
Organised FRAUD ON Mr & Mrs Average. THE CORRUPTION OF CITIZENS in our allegedly
civilised pseudo-democracy are soundly covered in our pages. In our pages EXPOSED SOME OF
THE CORRUPTED WHO FELL IN LOVE WITH THE ARRANGEMENTS IN PLACE FOR RAMPANT FRAUD THROUGH
THE COURTS. The named 'morons' we expose RECKLESSLY SUPPRESSED & CARRY ON SUPPRESSING
the realities of life within an allegedly democratic state. Many the victims of crime who
APPEAR TO HAVE CAPITULATED TO BLACKMAIL (those who simply go for the cash under the table) AND WITH INTENT FAIL TO REPORT
THE CRIMINAL ACTIVITIES THEY WERE SUBJECTED TO, SIMPLY BECAUSE THEY FELL IN LOVE WITH THE
ORGANISED FRAUD ON THE TAXPAYERS & JOIN IN THE ACTIVITIES AS PROMOTERS &
MAINTENANCE ENGINEERS WHO OBJECT TO ANY INDIVIDUAL OR GROUP OF VICTIMS WHO ACTIVELY ENGAGE
IN CHALLENGING & EXPOSING IT ALL TO THE TAXPAYERS.
6. *Link from here to elements from the past as promoted by the followers
of the peddlers who first conceived the system of dictatorships through judges, and
after reading of the recorded operations, recognise the extent of the work warranted after
an allegedly Honourable Officer of the Supreme Court -a solicitor- indulged in the
promotion of a blunt FORGERY THROUGH WHICH HE ATTEMPTED TO CAUSE HIS CLIENT, the creator
of these pages, an old school friend and victim of FRAUD, to abandon his legitimate and
open & shut case against the offending fraudsters the solicitor and the barrister he
retained / instructed instigated legal proceedings against.
7. *Access from here
the document we put together for use by the wronged and victims of persons who abuse
position of authority, such as public servants and or anyone who purportedly was / is
serving citizen / taxpayer who were / are wronged, defrauded of rights and properties.
*Access also from here xxx
8. *Access from here
the page where relative to a
police officer who defaulted / failed to execute his duties as an officer of Justice / of
the law. After he was pronounced guilty of misconduct in public office, he appealed
but failed to have the court's (jury's) decision reversed by the Court of Appeal, where
their Lordships deliberated on the issues that arose as a consequence of the police
officer's 'breaches of public duty'. We urge persons who visit the page & read the
precedent case, TO TAKE ON BOARD THE ELEMENTS USED, BY THE POLICE OFFICERS LEGAL TEAM,
when challenging the jury's decision, before their Lordships at the Court of Appeal. We
further urge visitors to *access from here the page
where we raise our objections to the very live elements attached to the
criminal activities used for the implementation of the RAMPANT FRAUD & CORRUTION
orgnaised and processed through abuse of the courts facilities, in our / all allegedly
civilised pseudodemocracies. *Access also from here a
House of Lords precedent case which Andrew kept up his sleeves from 1975 to March 2008.
Throughout the years, Andrew researching and investigating the criminal activities ongoing
IN THE COURTS with the blessings of the police, the judiciary and Ministers of Justice
-Lord Chancellors- of all political colorations. And worse with blunt participation in the
promotion of the practice by persons who discarded / dispense with any moral consciousness
they might have benefited from at some time in their existence among other alleged humans :
thinkers. We refer to purported / assumed users of any grey matter they may have been
gifted with, by the creator sold to the ill-educated and the ill-informed 'sons of men on
planet earth', as promoted and sold to the naive and gullible by the agents and followers
of the creator they adopted as their God. *Access from
here a typical examples of the Messages delivered and promoted, as Holy Scriptures, to the
naive and gullible by the followers of such evil examples taught, promoted and &
..To Home Page Back to Page KEY