Crime - Organised -Institutionalised - Corruption - Fraud - Protection Rackets,  run and managed by judicial chair occupants, in a free-for-all state of abundance. Note the all-embracing guarantee, in place but in contempt of all law.

This page is dedicated to the abandoned, to the used & abused by fraudsters club recruits victims for more of the same. The elements are covered in the exclusive page where we point to the foundations for the rampant fraudulent activities in allegedly civilised pseudo-democracies. We refer to the ORGANISED CRIME through abuse of the courts' facilities, intened to lead to the corruption of conditioned morons and idiots who fail to recognise the elements we have been pointing to since May 1992, when the managers, controllers and organisers of the LIPS crow/mob (Litigants In person Society) contacted Mr. Andrew Yiannides within days of lodging and filing an explicit Appeal at Bow County Court, because of blunt and arrogant criminal activities the police, the staff and officers at the Court engaged in, in contempt of the law and   a result of or over  (*Link)

"The court has inherent jurisdiction to stay an action which must fail; as, for instance an action brought in respect of an act of State". (And by extension any act of any public servant who is appointed, retained and maintained by other public servants for all of whom, the state, as employer, is ultimately responsible, including abusers of judicial chair occupancy and hence, the billions paid out as covered in the exclusive affidavit that visitors can link to directly from here - *Link also to the founder's conclusions as of 1972-75 when the great Metropolitan police were seen to be nothing but accessories and abettors of the rampant fraud and corruption through the courts while Members of Parliament were -as they still do- promoting the waffle that amounts to nothing short of 'independence of the judiciary to act in contempt of ALL of Parliament's Laws in a pseudo-democracy)Page Revised: June 20, 2012

RESPONSIBLE FOR THE STATE OF AFFAIRS, successive irresponsible Lord Chancellors and Home Secretaries who ignored all complaints and submissions irrespective of the evidence and the law pointed to, by the victims of it all, the citizens who are called upon to pay taxes for the maintenance of criminals in public office.(*Link to our exclusive page, covering confidential fraud as arranged THROUGH THE BEST KEPT OPEN SECRET in alleged democracies, European States. Elsewhere the foundations and corner stone upon which the operatives built the societies of their making using the bricks and mortar we cover in this and other pages. The visitor should not be under any illusion that the stars in the theatrical productions, covered in this and other pages were by any stretch of the imagination 'humans' who were / are gifted with any attributes that distinguish 'true humans' (thinkers) from animals).

Read of CORRUPT Detectives, Judges, Lawyers, Ministers - article in the London Evening Standard [*Link to image & text]

newsltrs.htm           KEY  PageChanges 1 Nov. 2004

hrbnrsml.gif (1162 bytes)JOIN the Community On Line and work with others for and in the necessary challenges and exposures for the common good. Link to Information Page

HELP US TO HELP YOU Please (*Link to plea).


The visitor's attention is drawn to the words of Jesus Christ, attributed to Him by the editors / creators of The Gospel according to St. Luke. Access His words to the lawyers some 2000 years ago. Many the dignitaries over the two millennia who shared His views (*Link).

 

 

 

 

NEWSLETTERS  *Page Revised: June 20, 2012*

undercon.gif (286 bytes) Site under reconstruction - ongoing additions and improvements

VISITORS ARE URGED to access and READ THE IMPORTANT update and ADDENDA we were obliged to introduce in January 2002. We had no choice but to REPORT THE CRIMES TO THE TREASURY. Our observations and knowledge of the constructive frauds made us accessories if we kept quiet, like the alleged victims who work towards the implementation of the schemes by the abductors and rapists of Justice, the Goddess. You will find the addenda statement at the top of the Updated Pages File. We are sure that you will share with us our concerns and most profound disappointment at and with persons who adopt and promote activities which they know are nothing but downright crimes. We refer to our exclusive page where we expose (as conscientious law abiding citizens) the Confidentiality Between Fraudsters that exists care of the BEST OPEN SECRET. 

Guidelines on Navigating through the extensive material: access instructions.  

As part of the reconstruction process our new pages and pages where changes and additions have been implemented, the improved / amended pages are endorsed with the link 'Page Changes and the date of the last changes. The link takes visitors to a List of the changes implemented in the page. These include new material and links from relevant paragraphs to other or new relevant material in other pages. For further clarification email: webmaster@

Attention is drawn to the statement, in red characters above. It is imperative that visitors to these pages and web-site, are made aware of the most important and crucial factor, upon which rests and is founded the perpetuation of the rampant fraud and corruption in our society / country. Most persons who have looked into the issues that victim-citizens relate to them (reporters and Members of Parliament, for instance) may well resolve to accept the problems as complex and not within their understanding or capabilities because of luck of knowledge of the legal issues that attach to the complaints. We urge that visitors should read the extract from a letter that a solicitor sent to a client (*Link) wherein the solicitor covered the arrangements between the administrators and the executive. References to the realities of life, as imposed on society by the creators and managers of CIUKU Enterprises, abound in our pages.(*Link to the founder's conclusion over 30 years ago).

However, the simple fact happens to be 'the attitudes of those who are seen to be nothing but the frontline soldiers who promote the existing practices through the dual roles they engage in:-

  • A.    On the one hand they simply relate the problems and difficulties they encountered/encounter with: -
    1.     Their legal representatives / solicitors by far the main culprits; also issues arising out of the manner with which barristers retained and presumably/allegedly instructed by their solicitors, acted in the course of hearings. (*F1).
    2.     Police officers (right up to area Commanders) who invariably come up with such inexcusable assertions as a 'victim', Mr G Ebert was running around promoting and 'selling' to all manner of victims and gullible 'serfs'. We refer to the letter from Charring Cross police Station in London, which you can access in our pages (*Link to left margin scans). There you can read also of the results when that promotional material was challenged as the situation commanded. Mr G. Ebert may have denied Andrew a copy of that disgraceful letter but the matter was taken up by Mr Norman Scarth, as Andrew discussed with him, because Norman Scarth who, as Secretary of the Litigants In Person Society, was provided with a copy.
    3.     Their member of Parliament and any Minister they apparently wrote or write to throws back at them. For the purposes of the submissions in this page it is most important that the reader / visitor does not loose sight of the fact that the vast majority of such 'fraudsters club recruits' (*Link to the facility in place for blackmail and 'buying consciousness'), charlatans and stooges. Such persons, those who were sent along or introduced to Andrew, the founder of *human-rights* knew of and had been informed of the fact that in 1992, Andrew successfully challenged fraudulent in intent practices and activities at a County Court (*F2). The very persons who were sending along their tutored stooges, contacted Andrew in the first instance and offered co-operation for the creation of data for / in 'The CAMILA Project'. The persons, Mr. Peter Hayward and Mrs. Philomena Cullen, NEVER acted as they allegedly were in a position to do. It should be noted that all were informed of the fact that in July 1995, Andrew benefited from an acknowledgement (*Link to main window) in respect of THE FRAUD IN THE LEGAL SYSTEM. No one ever bothered to enquire what preceded that event and as a result of what work or submissions to the Prime Minister in waiting, the Rt. Hon. Tony Blair, lead to the Spokes Person on Legal Affairs for the Opposition to concede / acknowledge the practices. Peter Hayward and others from within the LIPS crowd/mob (as we prefer to refer to the fraudsters) had only one goal in mind; to use the needs of the victims of the rampant fraud and corruption (through the courts) for personal gain and pecuniary advantage. MOST ALARMING WAS THEIR APPARENT APPROVAL OF THE ARRANGEMENTS IN PLACE for the double fraud (*F3)  on the 'serfs', the taxpayers.
  • B.    On the other hand as sold to the devil souls and 'fraudsters club recruits' they carry on ranting about the rampant fraud in and through the courts. They do so AS CONVERTS to the facility in place, for the double fraud on 'the serfs', 'the shitizens'. They just carry on 'promoting the practices by the system's operators' because they are serving those interests:
    1.     Their main objective is to ensure that victims they target are used, exactly as they were used, and for one goal only. The reward under the table for those who endorse the system as is. One such charlatan and 'fraudsters club recruit' / lover, Mr Norman Scarth even declared, in an email, that what he stumbled upon was 'legal'. It never occurred to him that what he had agreed to be party to was to keep quiet, take what was on offer under the table and 'be party to, accessory and abettor to the double fraud BY AGREEING TO KEEP QUIET ABOUT IT ALL". 
    2.     Such persons, thereafter, simply using / helping / guiding others to go for and down the same avenue. Norman did receive a copy of the explicit affidavit that we publish in our pages, AS A WARNING SHOT (*Link). Johan  attempted to but Norman succeeded in enticing an active member of the Community On Line to go down the same avenue and to 'remove all of her material (evidence) & to delete her personal web-site; just 'another sold to the devil soul'. Norman and others who were / had embarked on the same path, at the time, were not told of our plans for such fraudsters and the operators of the system. He and his like-minded mates (from within the LIPS crowd/mob and other groups / movements and organised fraudsters he and the others were rubbing shoulders with in private) ignored the fact that their intentions were known to Andrew. Andrew had been invited to be party to their schemes/plans 'to help victims of the legal circles' (persons they were/are targeting) as THE NEW GURUS who learned how to play the field. Most had been made aware of the fact that for years Andrew was looking into THE REASONS, such as WHO / WHAT were / ARE behind the perpetuation of the established practices, DESPITE the words of Jesus Christ to the lawyers almost 2000 years ago. Or at about 1700 years ago, when the editors/creators of 'The Gospel According to St. Luke' were putting together 'The New Testament' (*Link). Another charlatan, who had declared himself to be 'A Born Again Christian' was one of the recipients of copy of the same affidavit. Recipient of copy of the same affidavit was also the person who submitted his thoughts in the email we publish below, Mr. Paul Talbot-Jenkins a person who joined the Community on Line as an assumed endorser of the statement of intent "OUR AIMS". (*Link) . 
  •  

We refer, above, to persons who, like the second fraudster we list in this paragraph, after going for the carrot in place, decided that 'it was & is all within their expectations and understanding of the law' and, therefore, legal. That is precisely what the chum of Johan M Foenander, Mr. Norman Scarth, also determined, as one of the many who went for the carrot dangling on a string for persons who endorse the double fraud on the taxpayers'. Such persons, thereafter, acting as bought and sold souls, blackmailed into endorsement of it all, stooges, who make it their business to obstruct any other from challenging and exposing the arrangements in place and all because they set up business as legal advisors following in the footsteps of the Husseins and the Lou Foleys (*Link 1 - *Link 2). We request that visitors access and read the letter the fraudster Johan M. Foenander wrote to Mr Geoffrey Harold Scriven which we publish in support of our statement "Institutionally Organised Fraud and Corruption". The copy we reproduce (*Link) was given to Andrew (in order to impress him) while the fraudster was of the opinion that he was playing with a mouse. We request of visitors / readers to also access Andrew's response to an invitation (*Link) and the evidence relevant to Andrew's stance on the issue of 'no association with persons who rub shoulders with the criminals who are in control of the legal system, the courts'. (*Link also to another page with documented evidence in support of another invitation).

Community NEWSLETTERS
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

25th May 2004
===========
Human-Rights Organisation Community on Line
NEWSLETTER - 2004/My/006

=======================

Friends
I. Your attention is drawn to the new version of the page:
http://www.uk-human-rights.org/corruptcourts.htm

You will note that there is plenty of scope in the page for links to material and evidence published in our pages. We do not need to invite you to submit links to (bookmarks and anchor-points) in your pages. If you need advice on how to create bookmarks and or anchor points, in your pages, contact us or someone who can help you. Contact, also others who you know might wish to have links to their pages ON THE ISSUES WE COVER IN THE ABOVE PAGE. We remind one and all that we co-operate with ALL GENUINE challengers who are stating the facts of life and publishing the evidence upon which they rely to establish 'abuse of public office and misuse of the facilities available at, and through the courts'.

II. We copy-paste below a self-explanatory letter that member Simon Muller of lancashire.human-rights.org will be posting to the Rt. Hon. David Blunkett, Home Secretary.

We stress and emphasise the simple fact that Mr Muller had to resort to a court application FOR Judicial Review of a decision by the Home Office. We are sure that the Home Secretary was not and has not been kept informed of the activities by alleged public(!) servants(?), who indulged at the expense of the targeted and ignored victim, for over a decade now. Mr Muller, as webmaster for the Lancashire area, will be acting as all genuine victims and those who object to the practices should do; in other words he will be reporting and exposing the full sordid story of his life in the public domain.

A reporter from a national newspaper attended the hearing/presentation on 29th April 2004. At the time the reporter indicated that newspaper editors and reporters 'would rather report the issues taken to them in 'their own way'. We pointed to the victim and the reporter the 'clearly stated facts of life, as acknowledged by an insider:
1. http://www.uk-human-rights.org/media.htm#words

Present at the time was a victim, for whom the paper produced only a half-baked potato in his case. He, we are informed, has been preparing for his own exposures on the Internet. We look forward to his march and onslaught on the offending abusers of facilities through the public services and the courts.

III. We have published a simple statement of facts arising out of the disputed Protocols of the wise men of Zion. Common sense and realisations founded and resting on historical facts, also published and promoted religious teachings and works are but the solid ground upon which we rest our fair comments and sound views. The page we release can be accessed at:
2. http://www.uk-human-rights.org/protocol.htm

The page should be read in conjunction with the material and the introduction to 'the family of man' which can be access at:
3. http://www.family.uk-human-rights.org

For the above web-site Andrew needs to secure a copy of a video production, by Clive James (Watchmaker 1999) believed to be 'The Night Of A Thousand Years'. Use of an Old Master, a painting depicting the Garden of Eden expulsion event was part of the backdrop to a scene in the TV production. Andrew needs to study the Old Master's presentation / interpretation of that biblical event. We are sure that you will have noted the references to the biblical story, in the page we have now up-graded. We have done so in order to meet with our strategy and plans, as to, 'how best to expose and challenge abusers of public office and the trust placed in them by the naive and gullible'. Any assistance leading to securing a copy of the video production and or leads that could secure a good photographic reproduction of the Old Master, as used for the above Television production, will be greatly appreciated.

The draft of the letter, as settled for the member of the Community on Line, follows:

Mr Simon Muller
38 Houghton Close
St Anne's
Lancs
FY8 3NA

22 May 2004

The Rt. Hon. David Blunkett
The Home Secretary
Cabinet Office
Downing Street
London SW1A

OPEN LETTER - FOR PERSONAL ATTENTION

Your Ref: Elected to serve the people
My Ref: Obstructions to / Denial of Rights Assured in International Law

Honourable Sir
Re: Attached, self-explanatory, copies of communications.
As with this letter all are executed / transferred in Braille for your personal attention:
1. Letter to the Administration Court / office at the Royal Courts of Justice, London, dated...........
2. Letter to the Mechanical Records Department at the Royal Courts of Justice, London, dated........
3. Letter to the Civil Appeals office at the Royal Courts of Justice, London, dated.........
4. My letter of ............., to my Member of Parliament, the Rt. Hon. ........., who, I have been informed, has communicated his concerns, to you personally.

I beg to refer and draw your personal attention to the following material that is published on the Internet at:
A. http://www.uk-human-rights.org/office.htm
where an explicit letter to the Rt. Hon. Frank Field MP, ex-Minister, is published. The letter points to a number of very serious issues indeed.

In particular the material facts and the evidence pointed to in the pages/material, published at the site and other web-sites, leads one to conclude that the free-for-all, and fraud on the public, is systematically imposed through the legal circles. An abused legal system and the courts services, wherein THE ADMINISTRATORS ACT IN CONTEMPT OF THE EVIDENCE PRESENTED TO & BEFORE THEM and, alarmingly, IN CONTEMPT OF PARLIAMENT'S LAWS!
Democratic governance,
resting and founded on law
and
order?

B. http://www.uk-human-rights.org/chaldep1.htm
where the activities and participation of the alleged victim, in the rampant DOUBLE FRAUD ON THE TAXPAYERS, was and will be seen in all its magnificence when all the evidence will be released for the public and the world at large to access. I was given to understand that the alleged victim was ONLY INTERESTED IN THE CASH UNDER THE TABLE that is covered in the exclusive page:
C. http://www.uk-human-rights.org/confraud.htm
where THE FACILITY FOR THE RAMPANT DOUBLE FRAUD ON THE TAXPAYERS is exposed. Billions of taxpayer's funds distributed through organised crime via the courts and the legal system. In the meantime genuine victims of the abusers of public office shunned and relegated to a pittance of an existence. Forced labour imposed, because of the need to chase abducted and raped daily, (up and down the country) in our courts, Justice. Surviving on Social Security (because of the maligned abuse of position by public servants) while 'licensed criminals' silver-line their pockets through abuse of the legal system with the blessings of the police (the main culprits in the destruction of my family life and health).

D. http://www.uk-human-rights.org/camilahp.htm
where Parliament's provisions, under the Criminal Justice Act 1988 are pointed to. TORMENT & TORTURE THROUGH ACTS OR OMISSIONS, defined clearly.

Sir, I have no doubt that you meant every word in your article, which the London Evening Standard published, as reproduced at and by human-rights in the first page (URL) that I point to above. I am also sure that the Rt. Hon. Prime Minister and other members of the cabinet will duly consider the wrongs imposed on me through abuse of public office, just as I am sure that New Labour WILL DELIVER JUSTICE out of the dungeons of the much abused courts and legal services.

Thanking you, in anticipation of your considered approach and directions to your subordinates, and to the police, whose prime duty HAS ALWAYS BEEN, TO INVESTIGATE CRIME PROPERLY, before presenting inexcusable and unjustified 'cases for prosecutions' to the Crown Prosecutions Service.

There is no doubt in my mind that by far the worst of elements in all that I was subjected to was 'the gravy train facility' THROUGH WHICH THE LEGAL CIRCLES WERE SILVER LINING THEIR POCKETS through abuse of the Legal Aid funds while ruining and destroying my life.
Sincerely

Simon Muller

ENCL. As text.
/ends
+++++++++++

NOTE PLEASE that we will gladly incorporate a small image, the same size as the one we use at the top (left margin) of most of our pages. Provide us also with a link to your material and a few words by way of introduction (for inclusion in our FOOTNOTES) and we will incorporate it in the new version of the /corruptcourts.htm page.
Andrew Yiannides
*human-rights* (NGO)
London - UK
25th May 2004
/end of Newsletter to members of the Community On Line

From human-rights (NGO) - London - UK
Community NEWSLETTER - July 19th, 2004
===================================
Human-Rights Organisation Community on Line
NEWSLETTER - 2004/Jl/009

======================

Friends

For a number of reasons we delayed communicating the latest and we are sure you will understand as you read through this posting. Those of you who failed to access the submissions document that was published but not released – pointed to – prior to the hearing of 29th April 2004, should access the document now at:
1.http://www.lancashire.human-rights.org/submissions.htm

The document and pleadings were introduced in accordance with the rights of a party to ANY PROCEEDINGS under provisions of rules of Court we published in our pages, long ago. We are familiar with the practices that ‘fraudster club recruits’ promote as part of their subliminal indoctrination routines. Such persons relentlessly assert and promote the criminal activities THEY SPEAK OF IN PRIVATE but do nothing about reporting the blunt crimes they know of. As lovers of the arrangements, FOR the DOUBLE CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUDS (on the taxpayers, through abuse of the courts’ facilities) they shove their heads in the sand every time they are challenged to address the facts covered in our exclusive page:
2. http://www.uk-human-rights.org/confraud.htm

Sadly we have to admit that even members of the Community on Line act likewise, thereby raising the logical question: How genuine are the intentions of such persons? Conveniently organised defaults and omissions’ by persons who are not content to sell their soul to the devil for rewards arranged through the second fraud on the taxpayers. The very persons also indulge in fraudulent representations and plenty of false assertions attached to wilful activities in the background, in addition to the promotion of many an unchallenged criminal activity by the legal circles, court staff and officers, too. Reliance on the last, the cornerstone upon which defaulters and abusers of public office work in tandem for the promotion and creation of the society of their choice and making while ‘the serfs’ meet the cost.

A page, due for general release and access by all visitors to our pages should be the main springboard for promotion of the work of all pro-active members of the Community. We refer to members who publish more than just the stated facts, their experiences and the evidence in support of their allegations and claims. We refer to members who apply themselves to elements that arise out of the issues covered in their pages and the pages of other members. Among the issues covered in the page, the opinions of members (and the performance of some) in respect of their opinions as regards the free masons. The all important issue on the use of the word ‘judicial’ for decades, by the lovers of the system maintained and operated by abusers of public office and trust. Among the lovers and promoters of the system, as is, the intellectual prostitutes that John Swainton spoke of, when he was moving out of the firing line. Members who are or will be addressing questionable and blunt criminal activities by the legal circles and public servants should access the page:
3. http://www.ul-human-rights.org/archive.htm

We ask that you note the introductions published in the short paragraphs relative to elements raised in the page. We request that you consider the facilities for links to other pages and web-sites where the same elements are covered or expanded upon by members and or at the sites of other groups or individuals who wish to cross-link to our Home Pages and Community on Line sites. Members should contact us in the event that they wish to contribute either by providing us with bookmarks / anchor points to their pages, or to submit material for inclusion in the page.

We request that you access the letter we published in the page:
4. http://www.ik-human-rights.org/newsflash.html#pages

You should NOTE HOW Mr Johan M Foenander, who was introduced by the LIPS crowd/mob, addressed the issue of ‘the protected species’ when he was writing to Mr. Geoffrey Harold Scriven. We should clarify that the person he was writing of and about was in fact the specimen upon whom he and other chums of his from within the LIPS crowd/mob, have modelled themselves. Members and affiliates of the aforesaid front and set-up (for more of the same) were and have been behaving as expected of persons who endorsed and love it all, as is. Any wonder why persons of his calibre and mentality never applied or apply themselves to the issue of the rampant fraud and corruption through the courts? They write of the criminal activities in personal exchanges (as in the instance we point you to) and they speak of the activities, as promoters of it all, in the presence of and or targeted ‘serfs’. Serfs, naturally being the victims of the legal circles / system, who are ripe to be ‘subjected to the whims of the corrupters, the corrupt and the corrupted’. The corrupted, of course, are none other but ‘the fraudster club recruits’ we cover in the exclusive page, 2 above. As front line operatives of the subliminal indoctrination tactics and policy THEY ENSURE THAT THE PUBLIC AT LARGE IS NOT MADE AWARE OF THE ACTIVITIES THEY ENDORSED AND HAVE ADOPTED.

We refer to use of the facilities, in place, FOR MORE OF THE SAME à the double constructive frauds through theatrical productions in the ‘courts’. We cover such a ‘scenario’, the farce of a hearing in February 2000 at the RCJ. Thereat the facility for the creation‘ of an order of court for the silence of and by the sold souls’. We refer to those who capitulate to blackmail, settle under the terms of the facilities in place and thereafter indulge, exactly as the specimen / model citizen that Mr Johan Foenander was writing of to Mr. Geoffrey Harold Scriven. In the meantime the individuals and or their tutors / gurus (behind such scripts and scenarios) content with their handy-work and of opinion that they had sold, yet again, their promotional handiwork to one and all including us.

We publish below two FAX transmissions we were caused to send to the victim Mr Simon Muller, who joined the Community on Line three months ago. Members should apply a little common sense to the realities stated in the Fax transmissions. We were prepared for that which was to follow from and by the abusive of public office, court officers and court staff. A member of the press, from ‘The Guardian’, the prestigious, attended the hearing on 29th April. Mr Muller informed the reporter of the fact that the submissions document, copy of which had been handed to the reporter, was published on the Internet. The reporter was informed that the presence of the document, with the explicit submissions, was not announced or released to any other. It was explained, to the reporter, that there subsisted the need to point to readers (of the pleaded realities) to the anticipated contempt of all evidence and applicable law by any ‘judicial chair occupant’ who was to deal with the application before the court on the day (29th April). Indeed such proved to have been the case, just as the anticipated obstructions to justice followed, as covered in the two Fax communications that disclose much more and worse than what was expected, of public servants and the press.

+++++++++++++

1st Fax: MESSAGE

Dear Simon

I transmit two pages (versions) of the DRAFT; one, with the text boxes in black outline and the other changed to white ending without lines around the separate boxes, under each heading.

Each box at the top is headed as I TOLD YOU WELL OVER FIVE WEEKS AGO. It was after the abusers of public office FAILED to hand over the/your documents in order to re-constitute proper bundles and THE LIST of documents. I remind you, yet again, that the LIST SHOULD BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE SYSTEM I DEVISED OVER 29 years ago. YOU HAVE DONE ABSOLUTELY NOTHING in the area that should establish your case to the simplest of morons, let alone to your MP or the media girls and boys.

I ensured that you had a better and faster computer to work with and with the right programmes too. All the work so far was executed by and at my end, while you just keep yourself busy on the phone and in USELESS EXCHANGES with and for all sorts of matters but NOT the issues you should be dealing with.

I made it very clear that legal matters should be treated as a chess game. ONE MAKES THE NECESSARY & APPROPRIATE (as commanded under the circumstances) MOVES. To that effect you were told umpteen times WHAT YOU SHOULD BE DOING IN YOUR CASE---à YOUR CASE--à YOUR CASE.

What you transmitted as RECEIVED from Mrs Brown simply covered and covers what the opposition ARRANGED FOR YOU and not what you were told your moves should be. I ensured and WORKED in order to PREPARE MATTERS FOR YOU including the alternative computer, the right programmes, the web-site, etc. Everything so far was done and put in place FOR AND IN YOUR INTERESTS by human-rights, while you have been and are busying YOURSELF WITH THE MOVES OTHERS DABBLE WITH, while IGNORING YOURS, as pointed out to you weeks ago. In my letter to your Member of Parliament such issues will be raised BECAUSE, AS YOU WERE TOLD, I AM FAMILIAR WITH ALL OF THE ILLEGAL & EVIL PRACTICES that court staff and officers indulge in, in our pseudo-democracy FOR the free-for-all to rule supreme. I made it clear that you should not expect of me to play in accordance with their / your (adopted?) moves! I told you umpteen times that IF YOU WISH TO PLAY THEIR MOVES and by the conditions they impose on every other ill-informed 'serf / shitizen', you should do so WITHOUT EXPECTING OF ME TO BE TIED TO THEIR / YOUR PRE-DETERMINED CONDITIONS.

WHERE IS THE LIST that should be posted both to the Home Office and the Treasury legal advisers who should be asked to deal with the rules as placed on record in the CPR (rules) and at the same time to raise the issue of 'abused court processes' while relying on 'the two-liner' illegal arrangement which I pointed out to you, I have known of for well over 30 years, which issue you set about to abuse at the wrong time and in the wrong context? Also where is your letter to the editor of 'The Guardian'?

Sincerely

Andrew Yiannides NDD., ACFI., ATI., FNAAAS
Founder - *human-rights.org*
London - UK
+++++++++

2nd fax : MESSAGE

Dear Simon

Following transmission of the letter you received from the Civil Appeals Office and our telephone exchanges last night and this morning we should now challenge the attempt to railroad and hijack the case, in the usual manner that many victim-citizens speak of, the most vociferous ‘very conveniently’ do so only in private exchanges intended to impress 'new victims' they target.

As you know the Community on Line is changing the scenery and the tempo, however. You should challenge the attempt and demand of the author of the letter, and his colleagues, to act as public servants, who should be serving the citizens in accordance with the laws that parliament put in the statute books and various / successive governments endorsed through international treaties and accords and 'as signatories on behalf of the citizens' . Your letter should be as follows:

Dear Sir

Your letter of 6th instant is hereby, acknowledged.

Your attention is drawn to the application lodged with the court on………..(date) wherein explicit provisos were stipulated. I refer, to the issue of:

  1. The return (facilities for collection) of the bundles of documents lodged for the purpose of the hearing on 29th April 2004.
  2. Transcript of the hearing of 29th April 2004.
  3. Transcript of the judgement 'as delivered' by HH Mr Justice Richards at the end of the 'brief hearing' on 29th April 2004..

Reference to the court’s letter of ………….(copy attached) makes it abundantly clear that despite my letters of, (a) …………. & (b) ……………. the court , through the usual practices of staff retained to serve the public, simply failed and or defaulted with intent to comply with my legitimate requests. You will duly note that in that instance the court, through its staff, was extending time for the lodging of the essential bundles of documents that I rely upon to present my case to its officers, in view of the FACT that your colleagues and other 'public servants' had been AND TO THIS DAY ARE defaulting / failing to comply with my legitimate requests.

In consideration of the above facts and realities, and bearing in mind the existing state of affairs whereby public servants, staff of the courts have as yet to comply with my legitimate requests in compliance with my rights', and in view of the fact that I AM STILL WAITING for the return of all documents and the two transcripts that I applied for, some/over (choose which word applies and delete the other) two months ago, I now request that you refer this communication to the most senior member of staff in the department and or directly to whosoever has assumed the right to railroad and hijack my rights in law.

I object to reckless contempt of all law and to my rights to access to court unhindered (as it should be) and to the facilities warranted evidence in support of my application to the court, from the documents lodged for diligent reference to same by whosoever was to deal with the case on 29th April 2004, to the transcripts warranted and called for in order for the court to deal properly and as I SHOULD BE ABLE TO PROCEED without hindrance and or further obstacles through either recklessness, incompetence and or as directed from above by senior members of staff or even court officers.

In so far as I am aware, the United Kingdom was and has been, ever since, a signatory to the European Convention for Human Rights. The United Kingdom, also, happens to be a member state of the European Union, a fully fledged 'country/state' to democratic rule and governance. In the circumstances practices of old, such as the railroading and hijacking of any complaint before courts of law, should be abandoned.

I need only stress that the present situation (my having to challenge the proposition to impose the unacceptable straight jackets tactics) most certainly follows and or runs in tandem with reckless contempt of all law accompanied by wilful suppression and or shoving of evidence in family closets. Altogether 'practices' intended to obstruct and deny 'unadulterated access to justice and the law' to the 'citizens'. As seen and noted the failures, the defaults, and reckless contempt of 'the law', by and or through public servants collectively amount to nothing short of 'Justice is but an illusion sold to the naïve and gullible by illusionists and their partners in fraud on the public in what is stated to be a democratic state.

I hereby demand that you vacate the proposed attempt for a pseudo-hearing of my application and that you refer this communication to the persons I stipulate above. The court CAN & SHOULD MOVE ITSELF in order to cause junior staff within its buildings and area of administration, to comply and meet with MY RIGHTS THAT ARE ASSURED IN LAW - national and international.

Copies of this communication, and attached documents, are to be delivered to: (a) Lord Falconer, Minister for Constitutional Affairs & the Courts/Justice, (b) The Home Secretary and (c) My Member of Parliament.

Sincerely

S Muller
ENCL; 1. (their letter of…. Where extensions were mentioned

2. & 3 Your letters requesting transcripts & application for same at public expense.

The above should be sent by recorded delivery and you must ensure that the letters accompanying the copies to/for Lord Falconer and the Home Secretary are sent to 10 Downing Street, The Cabinet Office.

Sincerely

Andrew Yiannides NDD., ACFI., ATI., FNAAAS
Founder - *human-rights.org*
London - UK
/FAX /ends.
++++++++

We request that members who are familiar with the above practices should contact others who have fell victim to those who misconduct in public office. Abuse of the courts’ facilities, for theft of properties (through conversion of assets, via alleged legitimate legal costs) is being addressed through the only OPEN COURT on planet earth à THE INTERNET. Rights assured in law, are sold in pseudo-democracies by intellectual prostitutes who just blow their out of tune trumpets. Such rights are hijacked and stolen by public servants while ‘fraudster club recruits’ engage in ‘subliminal indoctrination tactics, arrogant promotion of the abusive of public office ‘power-mongers’ and they partake in more of the same à FOR the intended DOUBLE FRAUD on the taxpayers.

Andrew Yiannides
Founder *humans-rights* (NGO)
London – UK
20th July 2004

Human-Rights Organisation Community on Line
NEWSLETTER - 2004/Au/012

======================

Friends

We rushed out a short update yesterday which we trust prompted you to consider the wind of change – the fresh air from within the courts, after you accessed the footnote we added to the page:

  1. http://www.uk-human-rights.org/corruptcourts.htm#F1

We were contacted over the weekend by friends of a targeted victim of the Divorce Industry, hence our hasty posting yesterday. We copy below the main part of a letter that Andrew settled after discussing, at length with the targeted victim, the situation and the attempts to impose the usual on ‘the victim’, irrespective of the issues we point to in the above page.

NOTE: The ‘targeted’ will be joining the Community on Line (no facilities at the moment) hence the reason for no names and address, below. There is no need to pass on information in advance to the offenders, the abductors and rapists of Justice.

++++++++++++++++++++++++

Your Ref: JCS GF 3295/C

My Re: FDPAOCFC

OPEN LETTER

Dear Sir/Madam

Re: Xxxxxxxxx –v- Xxxxxxxxxxx

I beg to refer to your letter of 3rd June 2004 and the enclosed document dated 25th February 2004.

I would like to emphasise the fact that I am not Mr Bryan Hudson, nor Mr Johan Michael Foenander or Mr. Geoffrey Harold Scriven, of whose circumstances I was made aware recently by accessing material that is published on the Internet.

It was noted that exhibit ‘AC1’, as prepared for the deponent by ‘legal advisers / legally qualified team’, representing the deponent, discloses no income and in the circumstances I request that the deliberate discrepancy / suppression be attended to, forthwith.

I further demand that in attending to the above request that you also deal with the issue of ‘matrimonial assets’. A list of the matrimonial assets’ was and remains the first issue that the deponent should have submitted / come forward with as the applicant, whose first name, incidentally, should be / is Xxxxxxx (official records) and not Xxxxx as recorded in the documents you have posted to me.

I hereby confirm that my marriage to Mrs Xxxxxx Xxxxxxxx, who resides at ‘the matrimonial home’ at XX Xxxxx Xxxxx Ax, Xxxxxx Xxxx, Xxxts, XXX XXX is over. I emphasise that I recognise no one by the name of Xxxxx as used in the proceedings you appear to be in control of. I hereby request that, in order that we may ‘proceed appropriately’ in these matters, that you ensure, if you are representing Mrs Xxxxxx Xxxxxxx to attend to the relevant corrections of all records and that you meet the costs yourselves.

In view of the above, I submit that as I am not prepared to go down the paths that yourselves and others are seeking to place Mrs Xxxxxx Xxxxxxxx and myself are not acceptable to me, and that you deal with the following, forthwith:

  1. Attend to the preparation of a proper financial statement from / by Mrs. Xxxxxx Xxxxxxx. Ensure that all income from ‘the matrimonial assets’ that were transferred to ‘the sole name’ of Mrs Xxxxxx Xxxxxxx on or about 14th November 2002, be included.
  2. Attend to the issue and submission to me of a full Statement, by Mrs Xxxxxx Xxxxxxx, covering all matrimonial assets forthwith.
  3. Cease all attempts in furtherance of the usual practices, such as those that were at work in the three precedent cases that I accessed on the Internet.
  4. Proceed to arrangements (advise Mrs Xxxxxx Xxxxxxx of my right) to deal with the issues through mediation proper.

Sincerely
Xxxxxxxxx Xxxxxxx
Copies: To Whom It May Concern.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++

The above qualifies that we are referring to and relying on THE CITIZEN’S ALTERNATIVE PRECEDENT CASES. Cases that are recorded by us, as law-abiding citizens who are REPORTING CRIMES (to the world) and to persons of authority who are prepared to consider the criminal activities which others shoved in the dark corners of their minds and in the family closets. Those of you who have as yet to access the exclusive page where the most blunt and arrogant arrangement should hasten to do so now, without fail:
1. http://www.uk-human-rights.org/confraud.htm

The arrangements for the DOUBLE CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUDS on ‘the serfs’, were and remain offensive, constitute criminal in intent abuse of public office and, as such, are unacceptable to us. So it should be with and for ALL DECENT LAW-ABIDING CITIZENS. Not so for the fraudsters club recruits, who simply love the arrangements in place. Consider the fact that the fraudster who set about abusing and wasting Andrew’s time (as the plans of the fraudster and those who sent him to Andrew were) published and exposed to the world, nothing. His letter to G. H. Scriven makes it abundantly clear that he could not possibly plead ignorance of the laws that apply to the activities he and others embarked upon and indulged in.

At the above page, you MUST read the explicit affidavit that covers ‘the facility for blackmail’. Seen from another angle the arrangement can be seen as ‘the carrot at the end of the tunnel’, for asses to go for. Either way the ‘fraudsters club recruits’ ARE fully aware of the fact that by going for and ‘honouring the confidential stipulation / arrangements in place’, they consciously ENDORSE AND JOIN IN THE CONSPIRACY THAT DEFRAUDS the citizens, the taxpayers of billions pounds-sterling annually.

Such persons think of and consider the millions of victims of the legal circles and the courts as potential ‘clients’ and recruits to the system, just as the Hussein chap (and other agents / insiders of the system) did with the author of the letter you can read in the page:
http://www.uk-human-rights.org/newsflash.htm#pages

In the letter you will be reading of ‘the author’s grasp of the situation’ in the courts. That letter was written months after the author, and a firm of solicitors who were representing him turned down an offer from one of the solicitors who was party to the conversion of targeted assets through abuse of the courts' facilities and fraudulent court proceedings. The author was overlooking the simple fact that Andrew, the person he set out to impress, was aware of much more than just the parts that persons of his calibre, mentality and lack of morals play FOR THE PERPETUATION OF THE EXISTING STATE OF AFFAIRS. The fact was that Andrew was looking into the reasons, WHO & WHAT was/were responsible for the ongoing state of affairs as of the time (and beyond) when Jesus Christ addressed the lawyers of His days.

We point out to the fact that the managers/controllers of the LIPS crowd/mob contacted Andrew in 1992 AFTER the developments that followed the submission of copy of the appeal in ‘The Breeding Grounds – case’, to the Lord Chancellor. The LIPS crowd/mob NEVER co-operated as they had proclaimed when they contacted Andrew. Instead of working towards the creation of the CAP – data collection, through cases being stated FOR the Citizen’s Alternative Precedent data (cases). They simply carried on planning for the parts they were to play as ‘fraudsters club recruits’. They were more interested in obstructing The CAMILA Project which Peter Hayward, Philomena Cullen and others that ‘attracted their attention. For proof members should access the page:
2. http://www.uk-human-rights.org/2lipstalk.htm

Reading through the exchanges between the two in conversation (recorded by the instigator of the telephone call) one is made aware of the fact that Johan telephoned Norman with more than one issue on his mind. One recognises the fact that Johan was seeking to create a rift between Norman Scarth and Andrew, through his assertions about alleged libel and or the cessation of the co-operation that existed between Norman Scarth and Andrew, the founder of human-rights.

Andrew Yiannides
Founder *humans-rights* (NGO)
London – UK
11th August 2004

Human-Rights Organisation Community on Line
NEWSLETTER - 2004/Sept/013

===========================

Friends

We apologise for the length of this posting. We are sure, however, that you will find it most useful and we trust that all of you, genuine challengers, will be forwarding it to all whom you know to be or have been victims of the rampant fraud and corruption that is organised THROUGH the legal system.

You received the submissions to a firm of solicitors who indulged, with others, in the usual ‘antics’ used by the abductors and rapists of Justice when targeting ASSETS and properties FOR CONVERSION through abuse of the courts processes.

Over the last 12 years Andrew was simply looking into the causes and reasons WHY and what / who are responsible for the perpetuation of the rampant fraud and corruption despite the recognition of the part that lawyers (the legal circles) play in societies. The starting point was the Gospel according to St. Luke where one reads the words attributed to Christ according to the creators / editors of the New Testament some 1700 years ago. (Refer to the /quotes.htm page)

The three quotes from well-known dignitaries in our Home Pages were selected in order to point to the luck of scruples and morals and the need for such attributes in the leaders of societies, over the centuries. For over 12 years Andrew concentrated in one area of research, that of the existence of Sadomasochists who run around proclaiming much as alleged victims who ‘allegedly are challenging the wrongs imposed on ‘the serfs’ by the legal circles. In fact such persons are nothing but sold to the devil souls who embraced the arrangements in place and are USING and encouraging others (victims?) for the type of scenarios we cover in our exclusive page:

  1. http://www.human-rights.demon.co.uk/confraud.htm We are already naming a few of these persons, who we refer to, as ‘fraudsters club recruits’ for obvious reasons. Among them, sadly, even persons, who joined the Community on Line, with some of them interfering in the background, as we cover in the pages:
  2. http://www.uk-human-rights.org/actors2.htm
  3. http://www.uk-human-rights.org/actors.htm &
  4. http://www.uk-human-rights.org/thetruth.htm

Over the years we were contacted and we have had to deal with many attempts by such persons who even had the audacity to interfere in our work and sought to use our work for their own evil ends without permission or authority. Some even set out to obstruct our work and the Community’s aims in contempt of the simple fact that they were/are interfering with the rights of others, the rights of law abiding citizens.

To ‘fraudsters club recruits’, victims who joined/join the Community because they wished/wish to expose, to challenge and to set up proper claims against the offending authorities (by STATING THEIR FACTS & BY PUBLISHING EVIDENCE IN THE PUBLIC DOMAIN) should be stopped. The sold to the devil souls simply try to, and in some instances succeed, in encouraging victims to go for the carrot at the end of the tunnel (with no guarantees) as covered in our exclusive page No. 1 above. Fraudsters club recruits and converts, however, overlook the simple factor of ‘Balance of probability’ when indulging themselves and set off to promote excuses for their evil parts, and worst still for coming up with naïve justifications for their convenient and inexcusable defaults, while alleging to be law-abiding challenging (!) victims (?).

The main and initial objective of the sold souls is to cause victims, whom they target, to cease using or to abandon the facilities for ‘OUR AIMS’. Thus they block the victims from securing unadulterated compliance (by public servants) with and or the victims from making FULL USE of the principles: - ‘Justice to be seen to be done and JUSTICE TO BE SERVED in open courts. In the meantime, the two constructive frauds on the taxpayers are covered in our exclusive page which ALL failed and fail to address as silent endorsers of it all.

We publish below an exclusive letter that we settled for the divorce proceedings victim who was targeted with the usual antics, as covered in an earlier NEWSLETTER posting. We wish to inform members that while the victim was to receive a Court order that qualified the following:

  1. The Interim Third Party Order is discharged.
  2. The application for Third Party Debt order is discharged.
  3. The Hearing for 3rd November 2004 at 10am is vacated.

THE VERY offending abusers of facilities and users of created scenarios were indulging in new antics.

We copy below a communication that was warranted under the circumstances. We ask of members to duly consider the implications and to contact any persons they know of who have been the victims of ‘the divorce industry’ the flagship of CIUKU (Crimes Incorporated UK Unlimited) Enterprises.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Copy of the NEW submissions, follows
++++++

Dear Sir/Madam
Re: xxxxxxxxxxxx –v- xxxxxxxxxxxx

My letter of 9th August 2004 merited no acknowledgement and benefited from no response. In the afternoon of Friday 10th instant, my employer was handed some documents and as a consequence I am acting appropriately. I transmit this communication with 39 pages of material that I accessed and printed from the Internet. The material is transmitted in support of my challenges at the attempts to indulge or seek with others to use ‘created scenarios’ through which to impose the usual activities for conversion of targeted properties and assets, through abuse of the courts’ facilities.

Pages 2 to 39 the printouts from material that I accessed on the Internet and printed for reference to, I submit with only part of the file/folder and the elements covering law, practices and argument as to my rights at and in law. Other elements, than the ones I point to now, for and in each document/page ARE OF RELEVANCE but I contain myself to just one or two issues for the purposes of this communication. The documents transmitted are numbered in the top right hand corner and circled.

  1. Number 1 is copy of a short statement from my employer wherein he clarifies and qualifies precisely that which I stated in my earlier communication and re-iterate above.
  2. Page 18 (of 19 printed) from the file /corruptcourts.htm for reference to by you and any other interested or concerned party. I specifically draw your attention to the 1st paragraph of the FOOTNOTE.
  3. Page 1 (of 10 printed) from the file /yourrights.htm wherein clear references to rights that are assured under the European Convention and the Treaties of the European Union. Needless to say the element of ‘properties and due process of law’ as provided for under the ECoHR, the First Protocol is of the essence in respect of the attempts and improprieties such as my employer’s statement covers (copy document number 1 above).
  4. Page 5 (of 10 printed) from the file where the provisions of Article 29 of the Combined Treaties of the European Union are pointed to, among other relevant issues.
  5. Page 3 (of 6 printed) from the file /chancellor.htm where among other issues a letter to the Lord Chancellor (in 1998) and a facsimile transmission to the European Court of Human Rights are published. References to responses and to other consequential actions are published in the file. Among the issues ‘the right to life of one’s own planning and choice for one’s family and self, naturally.

6-7. Pages 4&5 (of 6 printed) from the file /chancellor.htm where pointed to are (a) the 2nd page of the letter to the Lord Chancellor, (b) the response and compliance to the citizens expectations from the court (ECoHR) because of the submitted legal arguments.

8-12. Pages 7, 8, 9, 11, 12 (of 19 printed) from the file /corruptcourts.htm wherein among the issues pointed to, the following: - (a) charlatans who are organising and leading groups of victims of the legal circles (as the issues covered in the appeal, the core element of/in the page). (b) A victim who had agreed to be party to the second fraud on the taxpayers, already, indulging in theatrics, fraudulent misrepresentations aplenty, in order to secure assistance including the appeal that is published in the page. The victim conveniently failing to proceed with the appeal for obvious reasons to persons who are familiar with the activities / practices. (NOTE: the second fraud on the taxpayers is covered in another page at the site). (c) Reference (in the first paragraph of the Appeal) to a used vehicle, such as the situation in the case at hand, which I set off to challenge in the first instance through my letter of 9th August 2004. In page 8 pointed to (among the other precedent cases) the Myers –v- Elman – case, that lead to the introduction of legislation about ‘wasted costs’ some 40 years after the House of Lords ruling in that case. Among other issues stated/covered (in the file) that of ‘misconduct in public office’, pre-arranged scenarios intended to lead to an appeal before one of the participants in the script for the original and consequential scenario, and much more.

13-15. Pages 13, 14 and 15 (scanned images) as printed from the file /newsflash.htm. The images are of the letter from ‘a person who was a very conscious party to the second fraud on the taxpayers’. The very person acting exactly as those he was complaining of and about; and the person recklessly suppressing material facts and evidence from the public through failures to report the criminal activities he was fully aware of.

  1. Page 16 is the scanned image of the letter from the solicitors who were acting for and representing the above participant in the constructive frauds on the taxpayers. The letter evinces the unsavoury parts of both solicitor and ‘client’, with the latter setting out to act and behave exactly as the fraudster he was writing of and about to Mr G. H. Scriven, to whom the letter was directed. Evidently the copy published on the Internet was handed to a person whom the author simply intended to impress with his excellent performance (that of the author, apparently a lousy actor).
  2. Page 17 is the scanned image of the letter from the Office of the Prime Minister. It evinces the fact that the Prime Minister directed material and submissions that were delivered to his private office to the Home Office, for attendance to by the Home Secretary, naturally.
  3. Page 18 is of the scanned image of a letter delivered by hand to 10 Downing Street. The author thanked the Prime Minister for recognising the simple fact that the activities covered by the submissions and the supporting evidence (as delivered to his office, earlier) were criminal activities.

19-26. Pages 1, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 (of 12 printed) from the file -/office.htm, where the submissions to the Rt. Hon. Frank Field MP (ex-Minister) are published along with the explicit article by the Home Secretary within days of the submissions reaching the Member of Parliament.

27-34. Pages 1, 4, 6, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17 (of 19 printed) from the file /corruptcourts.htm more of the pages where the explicit appeal is published that covers the activities at and in the courts, as arranged by the operatives. The imposed wrongs many, and the issues raised even more. The most offensive of the activities that of the second fraud on the taxpayers as arranged between the operatives and the corrupted ‘victims’.

35-39. Pages 7, 8, 9, 11, 12 (of 13 printed) from the file /newsflash.htm where the scanned images of the letters referred to above (13 through to 18). In the pages (file) facts and realisations covering the activities at, in and through the courts with the blessings of abusers of public office and many a charlatan working with and for the administrators / practitioners either as organised groups or as individuals who embraced ‘the arrangements in place’.

In view of the above and in conformity with the directions / preferred activities (refer to the FOOTNOTE at the copy numbered 2) that ANY divorced or divorcing couple SHOULD BE ENGAGED / ENGAGING IN, I expect of you to act honourably in the instance at hand. I will appreciate it if you were to consider the provisions for EQUALITY OF THE SEXES as provided for under Article 14 of the European Convention for Human Rights and advise your client, accordingly, instead of attempting to use her as the Biblical Eve.

Sincerely
Xxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxx
Copies: To Whom It May Concern.
ENCL: 39 pages x A4 as text.
/ends
+++++++++++++++++++++++

We received, not long ago, information from a voluntary group who are seeking to assist and help victims of authority. Evidently one such victim was pointed to a reliable person, an alleged partner in a firm of solicitors and how the family of the victim were defrauded of thousands of pounds.

The scenario brought to mind the fraudster club recruit who was introduced to us by the LIPS crowd/mob. We simply emphasise the simple fact that the alleged victim came along AFTER he and his solicitors made it clear that they were only interested in the carrot at the end of the tunnel, the compensation from THE TAX CONTRIBUTIONS.

The very scenario also brought to mind others such as Norman Scarth and his mates from within the LIPS crowd/mob; also the charlatans who have been guiding and USING the victims who joined/join the UKMM. We refer to the United Kingdom Men’s Movement), to its leaders, to those who have as yet to respond to or comply with Andrew’s demands for explanations for their part in Crimes Incorporated UK Unlimited, after their unsolicited invitation to Andrew in 1998. Such persons, ‘fraudsters club recruits’, even arranged to end in prison in order to act as the good inmates who then point the targeted victims (who end in prison because of the usual antics and activities by the legal circles and fraudulently conducted court proceedings) to their mates outside. The ‘fraudsters club recruits’ organise themselves into alleged ‘law centres’ that are run, allegedly by qualified experts at law. The main objective of such persons naturally ‘the carrot at the end of the tunnel’ the carrot they point to ‘dangling at the exit of the tunnel for asses to aim for, WITHOUT ANY GUARANTEE that it will be there. In the meantime years of frustration, torment and torture and to hell with all of Parliaments laws because judicial chair occupants have ‘THE inherent jurisdiction to stay proceedings that MUST fail, especially if claims are against the state’. The most offensive of frauds on the taxpayers, the undisclosed provision by the administrators (?) of the law as approved, apparently by the Executive, our representatives in government.

WAKE UP BRITAIN & VICTIMS OF AUTHORITY IN PSEUDO-DEMOCRACIES.

We leave members and recipients with the above closing statement to ponder upon. We inform you all (other recipients of this NEWSLETTER too) that we will be releasing information about other charlatans, fraudsters and abusers of our time whose only aims were to either cause us to co-operate with them and the fraudsters club they joined or were working with and for. All failed/fail to consider Andrew’s resolve after benefiting from the facts stated and the evidence pointed to as covered in the page:

  1. http://www.human-rights.demon.co.uk/thetruth.htm
  2. In the meantime, many, like the alleged victim whose parts are covered in the ‘Divorce Lawyer Admits Fraud’ page / case’, such persons carry on promoting the usual false assertions and fraudulent misrepresentations about their own attitude towards the criminals who abducted and are raping Justice routinely. Such persons fully aware of the fraudulent in intent activities in courts maintained by an allegedly democratic state. We have no choice but to remind one and all that the said state is run, allegedly, on principles of law and order, the state that the CHARLATANS & FRAUDSTERS’ CLUB RECRUITS fight tooth and nail to keep as is, because they act as maintenance engineers.

    The desert for this posting is as bitter as they come: Be advised, friends, that our judicial chair occupants have THE ‘inherent jurisdiction to stay proceedings in action that MUST fail especially an action against the state’.

    DEMOCRACY ?

    JUSTICE ?

    We suggest that you refer to the founder’s conclusions well over 30 years ago, which you will find at:

  3. http://www.human-rights.demon.co.uk/index.html#hasten

Refer to and consider the submissions, which the targeted victim forwarded to abusers of the courts’ processes, and look up the facilities, in place, for the inclusion of names of offending abusers of trust:

  1. Solicitors
  2. Barristers
  3. Police
  4. Members of Parliament
  5. Occupiers of judicial chairs
  6. Any other public servant

The activities that you know of should be uppermost in the minds of ‘genuine and challenging ‘victims’, now.

We point out yet again to the short update which we trust prompted you to consider the wind of change – the fresh air from within the courts, which is the first element we also point to the solicitors in the present submissions, the footnote that we added to the page:

  1. http://www.uk-human-rights.org/corruptcourts.htm#F1

Andrew Yiannides
Founder *humans-rights* (NGO)
London – UK
8th September 2004
--

webmaster
human-rights organisation
protecting and promoting Human Rights World Wide
Go to: http://www.members.human-rights.org and JOIN
the Community On Line - Help Rescue 'Justice & Democracy'
REMEMBER:
"The cost to the good citizens, Q: R U ?
for their indifference in public affairs, Q: Do U care ?
is to be ruled by evil men". Q: Do U approve ?
Wise counsel by PLATO, classical Greece (428 - 347 BC)

Link to:  The ORIGINAL CHALLENGES

Human-Rights Organisation Community on Line
NEWSLETTER - 2004/Oct/014

=======================
 
Friends

We leave the best news for the lower part of this newsletter. Please read these most important issues because it is the start of the CATHARSIS that victims of the TRIAD, the unholy trinity, have been waiting for, for far too long. WE NEED YOUR PARTICIPATION as much as you need the participation and support of others, Community members or not. Any genuine input and contribution is welcome.

We have been faced with numerous obstructions from various activists(?) who endorsed(!) ‘the arrangements in place, for asses’ who love the carrot at the end of the ‘dark’ tunnel. We have been and are being held pinned down as of February 2002. Even persons who were and have been assisted over the years, and in particular by Andrew Yiannides (the founder of *human-rights* (NGO)) do not care about and or forgot the situations they found themselves in, after they achieve their goals.

Such persons exhibiting thus their egocentric nature and fraudulent intentions when they contacted us or when they elected to join the fraudsters club, as Norman Scarth went for when he was invited by others to work ‘against us’ while he carried on benefiting from support and assistance for years. Presumably the persons have been acting so because, as far as they are concerned, they cannot be bothered with the rights of any other.

Paradoxically they DID expect others to be concerned and to assist them in their personal plights. One only has to assume that such persons look upon the situations and the circumstances under which they were assisted, as non-events. It could also be a case of looking upon positive results, as achievements for which they are proud because they reached their destinations via their deceitful and fraudulent intentions for which they are probably ecstatically proud.

We do not overlook or ignore the conditions that non-thinkers are faced with because of the arrangements in place. The means in place ‘for promotion of, and instilling in non-thinkers the element of GREED FOR GREENS ONLY. No matter how secured, the greens, the ladder to ‘the fraudsters club’ the only element in sight for such ‘recruits to the system of operations’ in all pseudo-democracies.

Odd, it is not that persons, who complain about fraud and abuse of public office end up as fraudsters, themselves. Whether they accept it or not, the fact is that they acted & are acting as perfect ABUSERS OF THE TRUST that others placed/place in them, as presumed ‘humans’. To new members, we clarify that by ‘humans’ we mean – ‘thinkers’. We mean persons who having experienced the evil activities they complained of, in the first instance, they are accepted by us as persons who are not likely to ‘desire’ that others should go through the same routines and activities at, in and through the courts and the legal system. As GREED FOR GREENS (albeit fraudulently created and secured) TAKES OVER, such persons make a conscious choice to join the system as ‘fraudsters club recruits’.

Sadly we had to point out to some such sold, to ‘the system as is’ souls, that their new selves could only be looked at as ‘perfect models of Sadomasochists. We explained to a few (and clarify here) that persons, who themselves were victims of the system, may have loved being tormented (as masochists) by the evil who are in control in pseudo-democracies. We warned that their promotion and participation in enlisting and USING others, for the double constructive frauds scenarios, was outright criminal in intent. Furthermore they were told that the new roles they adopted for themselves (use and abuse of the courts for the facility that converted them) indicated sadistic tendencies because they assumed the right to cause others to enjoy the torment they themselves loved and love.

The victims that others point them to, and they target (as we cover in our pages), used through arrogant reliance on, promotion of the arrangements in place. THEIR ACCEPTANCE of the double constructive frauds scenarios, as presumed legitimate activities, while ignoring the fact that the practices amount to FRAUDS ON THE TAXPAYERS, were and remain blunt criminal activities. One such person being the great actor Norman Scarth. He even declared, in an email, that he found a legal way of generating income, in his late years.

We recommend accessing the following pages:

  1. http://www.uk-human-rights.org/theproof.htm
  2. There, visitors can read of the threats from solicitors, and of their subsequent defaults. Such activities on top of the defaults and obvious participation in the attempts by alleged challengers, including a ‘victim’(!), member of the Community. Just naïve and childish attempts that were intended to cause us to afford an allegedly genuine challenger, grounds to institute proceedings against us IF we were to act as the toilet roll holding Privy Council material solicitors intended and had pulled off their idiotic attempt. Fat chance, as if we failed to recognise the mannerisms and signs from ‘a sold to the system as is’ vociferous promoter of ‘the powers that be’, just AN EXPERT at ‘the subliminal indoctrination routines’ that the other charlatans (named in the page) were / are engaging in. Anyone accessing the page can recognise whom they were instructed to threaten, to intimidate and to target, as sold evil-mongering stooges. Any ‘thinker’ can recognise what type of persons and to what levels they stooped as alleged victims / activists / challengers WHEN SIMPLY SOLD to the arrangements in place, FOR THE DOUBLE FRAUD on the taxpayers.

  3. http://www.uk-human-rights.org/breeding.htm

Persons who access the page should recognise why the page is dedicated to the two named fraudsters club recruits, Mr Johan Michael Foenander and Mr Norman Scarth; also to their mates in the LIPS crowd/mob as well as to the affiliates of that disgraceful bunch of fraudsters. From their manager, Mr Peter Hayward, his ‘guru’ Mr George Kay, and many others, all had been informed of the attempts by the abusers of the court’s facilities, in that case. All were informed HOW the abusers of public office were caused to review their foul and evil activities while indulging in fraud after fraud at the expense of the targeted ‘serf’. Every one was given the facts and Mr J M Foenander was shown the documented evidence in that case. just as he saw documents from the case Korytsas –v- Demetri that took place way back in 1975. Yet he had the audacity to puke up some foul assertions when he telephoned Mr Norman Scarth for the evil mongering behind the scenes as covered in the transcript of the telephone call, that is published at:
3. http://www.uk-human-rights.org/2lipstalk.htm

Additional profound material, covering the activities and evil ploys of the used / guided and or sold to the system as is, engaging fraudsters club recruits, can be accessed at:

4. http://www.uk-human-rights.org/actors.htm

5. http://www.uk-human-rights.org/actors2.htm

Members should access the material in the news-flash page:

6. http://www.uk-human-rights.org/newsflash.htm

There we point to the fact and publish the evidence that ‘the fraudsters club recruit, Mr Johan Michael Foenander’ had gone for the carrot, as a typical non-thinker, an ass. The fraudster was sent along by the manager of the LIPS crowd/mob, Mr Peter Hayward SOME TWO MONTHS AFTER SOLICITORS, WHO WERE ACTING FOR THE FRAUDSTER, HAD GIVEN THE 2-FINGER SIGN to one of the solicitors who had been involved in the usual constructive frauds through divorce proceedings. The aforesaid proceedings in County Courts, and the Family Registry, had been conducted in the usual manner. New members or members who failed to access the page:

7. http://www.uk-human-rights.org/corruptcourts.htm

Should do so and get to know of the facts in that specimen of a show by the legal circles and consider also the subsequent performance by the protagonist, the lousy actor Mr Johan M Foenander. We point to, and emphasise, the fact that the solicitor (who turned down the offer from the offending solicitor) DID QUALIFY, ALSO, THAT HIS CLIENT’S CASE WAS NEARING COMPLETION at the European Court of Human Rights (Strasbourg). The very solicitor had earlier been involved in the Housing Benefit scams we cover in our pages. We refer to the constructive frauds instigated by public servants, the staff and officers who were handling Housing Benefit funds at Haringey Council. Nothing unusual, because the same practices were / are part of the Institutionally Organised FRAUD & CORRUPTION as evidence about other Local Authorities, we publish, establishes. The abuse of the Housing Benefit funds and rents owing to property owners simply the tip of the iceberg as far as tax-revenue and public funds go.

Flagship and the pride of CIUKU Enterprises the theft of properties and rights through creative accounting and false instruments aplenty, as pointed to and argued in the introduction to the page:

8. http://www.uk-human-rights.org/lawcompi.htm

The implications and legal position are clear. On the basis that ALL CITIZENS ARE EQUAL UNDER THE LAW, and resting on the simplest of logical foundations, the following. "There can be no defence for judicial chair occupants who deliver perverse judgements by issuing allegedly legitimate court orders, because by the nature of their public appointments / retainers they are presumed to know of the provisions of the law. By acting in contempt of the evidence before them, or the truth of the matters argued before them, AND BY ACTING IN CONTEMPT OF THE LAW THAT APPLIES TO THE FACTS ESTABLISHED IN EACH CASE they are simply acting in contempt of the law. Judges are seen to FAIL TO ACT AS THE LAW STIPULATES, as the authorities of it. They are noted for failing to consider the simple fact that they are public servants. As presumed professionals they are retained and maintained (by other public servants) at the expense of the citizens, yet more often that not, THEY SIMPLY FAIL TO SERVE THE CITIZENS ‘WITHOUT PREJUDICE & OR ANY HINT OF DISCRIMINATION’. Thus they are seen to misconduct in public office.

BELOW THE DESERT you should be looking for if you plugged for the lower part of this NEWSLETTER:

Members should have received the two earlier NEWSLETTERS that covered events attached to attempts by the legal circles, and condescending abusers of public office, court facilities. Members could not possibly have missed the challenges, as of the first instance, when the targeted victim contacted human-rights. The victim was just another male, a man, and just an irrelevant father. No member could possibly have missed, or overlooked, the fact that the solicitors and the court itself withdrew the exorbitant and inexcusable financial demands made of the targeted victim, albeit founded on ‘false and inexcusable instruments’.

In our last (previous) NEWSLETTER we gave you the details from the Court’s Order after the first challenges. We also published the details of the second set of challenges and details as to which elements, from our pages, they were pointed. NOW we inform you that yesterday, the 14th October 2004, the targeted victim received a court Order in the following terms:

IT IS ORDERED THAT the application is struck out.

Dated: 6th October 2004

We simply inform members that the application referred to in the new Order was by the solicitors acting for, representing but in reality USING the woman to whom the victim has been married for many years. It goes without saying that the targeted victim will now be making arrangements to go on line. He will be publishing everything for and in the interest of mankind, and as his contribution to the challenges we are to release as made of and directed, by us, to alleged supporters and leaders of men, victims of the divorce industry.

Andrew Yiannides
Founder *humans-rights* NGO)
London – UK
15th October 2004

From human-rights (NGO) - London - UK
Community NEWSLETTER - November 3rd, 2004

==========================================
Human-Rights Organisation Community on Line
NEWSLETTER - 2004/Nov/015
=======================

Friends

In this issue the following:

  1. New page created from and around the challenges that caused the abusers of the courts' facilities to abandon their plans for 'the targeted male/man / irrelevant father. We look to members who have been in contact with or have heard of men / fathers being ruined by the legal system because of 'how the courts' facilities are used by the users/managers of the legal system' to inform such victims of this very important page. (/solfraud.htm from 'SOLicitors & FRAUD').
  2. Another New Release - page where NEWSLETTERS are published for access to by members of the public.
  3. Those of you who recently accessed the member's area (to make changes or build your human-rights web-sites) SHOULD HAVE NOTED A VERY IMPORTANT CHANGE. After recent submissions to the Community Architect, management team, you can now benefit from an email facility. You can use your human-rights Community on Line web-site for email purposes. Just create any name @your.web-site.human-rights.org as an email address. Then select from the facility to either collect email by connecting to the password protected membership area, or to have any email posted to 'your chosen name'@domain-name.human-rights.org forwarded / re-routed automatically to the email address you registered (or nominated / changed to since joining the Community on Line. The facility should enhance your status as pro-active human-rights activists. No member should contemplate using the human-rights.org on its own as his or her email address without reference to and UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES WITHOUT AUTHORITY (written agreement with us, because of any country, district, city, webmaster services to the Community the person is offering as a whole). Anyone breaching this pre-condition will have his or her web-site disabled. We are sure that you will accept that no one should seek to misrepresent himself or herself as a member of the human-rights organisation team.
  4. IMPORTANT CHANGES to the pages at the web-site that Andrew created for the victim of the legal circles, whose case Andrew took all the way to the European Court of Human Rights. You will find the changes and the information now at your fingertips most revealing. The changes cover VERY IMPORTANT ELEMENTS & ISSUES, in particular and specifically about persons who were/are of opinion that Andrew was a naïve mouse to be messed around with by any cat. It is recommended that you first visit the new 'Solicitors & Fraud' page (A) at uk-human-rights.org as an introduction to the build up towards FULL EXPOSURE OF THE BRICKS USED BY THE ARCHITECTS IN ORDER TO BUILD THEIR TYPE OF CORRUPT SOCIETIES. You might then recognise WHY reference to the words of Andrew's niece and the element of Greed in the HomePage dedication panel.
  5. In April you were informed of the only page published at the Lancashire Human-Rights HomePages for and by Mr Simon Muller. Presently Mr Muller with assistance from a friend is putting together his pages and the relevant submissions to the jury at large. Naturally the pages/material are challenges to and for Public Servants to attend to. Andrew had been shown evidence that prompted him to inform Mr Muller that we were to use and refer to the element that caused the founder of human-rights to conclude (over three decades ago) that the courts were being used to impose kid-glove DICTATORSHIPS, on the naïve and gullible. That was some nine months ago, and it is a pity Mr Muller could not have attended to that aspect for almost seven months.

A. We are moving on from the developments last month, in the targeted divorce victim's case. You received the two important challenges that were included in NEWSLETTERS. We have now created a new page where we address the situation at two levels. The first is the present invitation to the family members, which we publish in the page. THEREIN THE EYE-OPENERS for 'any 'serf' in our country to note. The very issue applies also in any other pseudo-democracy as sold to the naïve and gullible everywhere, by the Intellectual Prostitutes that John Swainton was speaking of some 130 years ago. The precedent cases briefly stated, in the page, could be the most useful facility now available to the public at large. The second level is for the page to be used as the focal point for our submissions to the Parliamentary Select Committee now looking into Family Courts & Family Law issues. It goes without saying that the links to other web-sites and web-pages are most crucial. Access the new page:
1. http://www.uk-human-rightsd.org/solfraud.htm

&
Note the elements covered. Any member of the Community who missed out the relevant submissions / challenges can now access the content in another new page:
2. http://www.uk-human-rights.org/newslters.htm &
There you can access some of the recent NEWSLETTERS you received, which we have released for access in the Public Domain. We have included rose-pink coloured link buttons near the top of the page for selection of Newsletter by month / reference number.

B. If you missed out on the challenges and the results in the targeted divorce victim's case, you can now access the relevant NEWSLETTERS. You can acquaint yourselves with facts and the realities. 'Fraudsters club recruits' and subliminal indoctrination stooges / operatives' can no longer ignore our work, especially with the names of some the stars up in the limelight. Any Community member wishing further particulars should send an email to andrew@human-rights.demon.co.uk

C. Anyone who desires additional information as regards setting up an email address using his or her registered and operating human-rights web-site (sub-domain) should send an email to andrew @human-rights.demon.co.uk.

D. Access first the explicit email sent to the member at:
3. http://www.law.society.complaints.and.human-rights.org/theemail.htm

&
acquaint yourselves with some of the evidence being put together by Andrew over the last 12 years about persons who even cause their children to take their own lives (Andrew's brother in law for example) because of personal greed for greens (money) or idiotic and egocentric mentalities. After reading the email access and read the letter the victim received (by registered mail). Then prepare yourselves for the affidavit she failed to execute for almost three years (next February) while the work for and in her interests was ongoing. Access and read the Current thought as presented by the creator of the web-site and the legal submissions, Pleadings & Legal arguments. Then consider the simple fact that the victim had been told Andrew was prepared for all eventualities (and the usual from the European Court. WE HAD TAKEN ALL NECESSARY STEPS to act accordingly later. It is immaterial if the victim just grabbed what was on offer because the elements leading up to the submissions to the ECoHR and the subsequent exchanges WERE TO BE CHALLENGED at two levels. One of them was to be the next challenge addressing false instruments intended to create 'cover for the confidentiality condition for settlements', the carrot that 'turns victims to lovers of the system as is'. WAKE UP ALL TAXPAYERS. Andrew was never a mouse, never accepted to be party to such evil activities and frauds on the taxpayers. Access and read the whole of the page:
4. http://www.uk-human-rights.org/theproof.htm

ALSO
5. http://www.uk-human-rights.org/breeding.htm#attending

&
Recognise HOW they all tried to entice Andrew in their world of evil and intrigue from the architects themselves, to 'undeclared agents'. Also persons like the chap who recommended Andrew's work to the Society of Lawyers in England & Wales. Not forgetting of course the charlatans and fraudsters who organised, tutored or 'introduced others who acted as tutors' to the carrot loving stooges, all managed and guided by the likes of persons we are naming in our pages. From the LIPS crowd/mob to the UKMM shysters / fraudsters and others who jump on the bandwagon as soon as anyone makes a bit of headway in the exposure and challenge areas. Such persons rush in and offer their expertise as alleged co-ordinators WHILE DOING THEIR DAMN BEST TO OBSTRUCT & HINDER ANY REAL BREAK THROUGH.

  1. Mr Muller was sent a banner for lancashire.human-rights.org and requested to use his opening statement lines as bulleted punch lines. Apparently the person who was/is assisting him (creating his pages for the web-site) was not in a position to copy and paste each short statement (start to full-stop). We trust that you will be accessing the site and contacting Mr Muller if anyone can help or assist him in any way. We expect the chap who worked WITH a victim in order to create the scenario in the page /theproof.htm to keep away.

Andrew Yiannides
Founder *humans-rights* (NGO)
London – UK
3 November 2004

From human-rights (NGO) - London - UK
Community NEWSLETTER - November 18th, 2004
=====================================
Human-Rights Organisation Community on Line
NEWSLETTER - 2004/Nov/016

===========================

Friends

In this issue the following:
We have now released documented evidence covering the activities of the fraudsters club Mrs Veronica Beryl Fodden of Plymouth (VBF for short). When accessing the page members should use the link from the top of the page and go straight to the List if the documented evidence released.

  1. We urge members to access the /courts.htm page where we published evidence that solicitors, barristers and judges indulged in the creation and use of a FORGERY in order to pervert and corrupt justice. Lord Jeffrey Archer was sent down for a lesser crime than the legal circles indulged in WITH THE BLESSINGS OF THE POLICE, naturally. Members will duly note that in the VBH case the scenarios created by the criminals who abused the courts facilities, the police similarly acted in contempt of Parliament's law. Thus the avenue to the DOUBLE CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUDS on the taxpayer open to abuse by the stooge who came along to abuse Andrew's goodwill and readiness to assist 'victims' of the LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES.
  2. In the page you will note that we included a scan of the article covering the Prime Minister's new plans for the citizens. We are promised, by the Rt. Hon Tony Blair and his government, that there will be a shift away from the welfare state dependency to a state of opportunities. With the billions that can be saved from the essential changes in attitude and practices in the courts and THE POLICE, we can see it all coming true. As the case will unfold the additional elements that we will be pointing to, will include EXPLICIT challenges to abusers of public office, in other cases. We refer to fraudsters who were / are operating within Local Authority offices who appear to be implementing Local Authority policies. The very elements are evinced in the case that called for the challenges and pleadings members should have accessed after we released the material that established HOW & WHY the introduction of the Bill of Rights in 1997.
  3. The page where we will be covering all of the parts the actress from Plymouth (VBF) took on as an accomplished fraudsters club recruit, is not linked to from any other page at the site or from any other site at the moment. We request of members to access it and to report any broken links. Members could also come forward with any links they may wish for us to introduce from the page to bookmarks in their pages. Note please that the links (either way) will best serve the Community's aims, if links from site to site are contained to similar elements / activities such as for each evidence and element, we have released, covers.

Contact Andrew if you need further information or assistance and guidance for the creation of bookmarks to specific paragraphs / part of a page in your pages.

A. The NEW material / pages to access:
1. http://www.uk-human-rights.org/convicti.htm
From there you can also access the original page we published in 2002, at the time when we reported to the Home Secretary / Office, to the Treasury and to the Prime Minister's private office our objections to the arrogant abuse of the courts' facilities for rampant constructive frauds.
2. http://www.uk-human-rights.org/chaldep1.htm
Access the most obvious of elements when the fraud of an alleged victim, Mrs. Veronica Beryl Fodden, miraculously defauled to challenge and report THE BLUNT PERJURY, by the solicitor who was representing the firm of solicitors she instituted proceedings against! We point to the obvious and publish the evidence the aspiring fraudsters club recruit convniently igonred while of opinion that we would also suppress and ignore the obvious : WHICH SIDE (OF THE FENCE SHE CAME FROM & SHE WAS PERCHING WITH THE REST OF THE FRAUDSTERS CLUB RECRUITS.
3. http://www.uk-human-rights.org/theyknow.htm
The page where we published the evidence - EMAIL & FACSIMILE tarnsmissions / reports to government relative to the blunt and arrogant parts of the pro-active Fraudsters Club Recruit Mr. Veronica Beryl Fodden./td>
4. http://www.uk-human-rights.org/courts.htm
There you can access the part of the transcript that evinces the parts played by abusers of judicial chair occupation FOR THEFT OF PROPERTIES including the right to unadulterated justice. The forgery used in that instance merited from the same mentality and contempt for Parliament's Laws by the discredited Metropolitan Police.
5. http://www.uk-human-rights.org/actors.htm
There you will not fail to note the explicit words we have released now. We refer to the arrangement / provision put in place, by the judiciary. It evinces their contempt FOR ALL LAW and their arrogance for their self created right to indulge as they stipulate through such ILLEGAL PROVISIONS, to all manner of criminals and criminal activities, as protection racket operators. Members are urged to access the page where we published the evidence that Andrew declined offers and refused to be drawn into the legal system, because of the criminal activities that were/are ongoing because of the attitude of judges to all law, so long as their contempt served other ulterior motives, objectives and or purpose.
http://www.uk-human-rights.org/theproof.htm
There we published an invitation and we cover the activities, ATTEMPTS by maligned stooges and charlatans whose love of the system as is was exhibited from the first moment THEY FAILED to access and address the issues covered in the exclusive page,
6. http://www.uk-human-rights.org/confraud.htm
Needless to say all known fraudsters club recruits were warned that they will be included in the list we have been preparing for release and publication in our pages.
. The most common and fundamental issue that nearly all cases we have been referred to or been informed of are subject to, happens to be denial of rights, at the very least. A visit to the pages that Mr Simon Muller has put together, as part of his challenges of the authorities will now be used as link-to material in letters. Letters and our submissions will be despatched to officials who failed to apply Parliament's Law to the documented evidence ha has now released for public access.
B. The NEW member's web-site, below:
7. http://www.lancashire.human-rights.org
Andrew Yiannides
Founder *humans-rights* NGO)
London – UK
18 November 2004
From human-rights (NGO) - London - UK
Community NEWSLETTER - November 25th, 2004

=====================================
Human-Rights Organisation Community on Line
NEWSLETTER - 2004/Nov/017

===========================
 
Friends

We would like to draw your attention to the content of the draft letter we settled for member Simon Muller of *lancashire* to complete by adding the essential URL's / links as requested /guided.

The draft had been prepared initially back in August, four weeks after our submissions to his MP, on 8th July 2004. We were waiting for Mr Muller to prepare / publish his pages / evidence before proceeding in the matter.

Below, the draft as received by Mr Muller by FAX, after an email with attachment (MS Word) failed to reach him.

NOTE that we will be adding this newsletter to the archives at:

http://www.uk-human-rights.org/newsltrs.htm where some of the recent and very pertinent NEWSLETTERS are published. As you got to know, 'the challenged divorce industry impositions, by the abusers of the courts' facilities' WERE ABANDONED.

MESSAGE

Dear Simon

The draft letter that I propose for you to write to your Member of Parliament is intended to best present your case / submissions to your MP in tandem with the submissions from human-rights. It should be adjusted to best cover / point to THE EVIDENCE the jury at large -the international community- can access. EACH HUMAN (thinker) WHO ACCESSES IT to determine, for himself, what forces are at work within our national boundaries, in an allegedly civilised state. That said, I will appreciate your own considerations and co-operation in how best to BRIEFLY introduce each element that the evidence you publish, and we are to point to, ESTABLISHES.

THE DRAFT:

Dear Mr Jack

Further to the representations made to you 'by public servants', in respect of the activities that I have been subjected to by 'state employees and representatives', I beg to draw your attention to Sections 134 and 135 of the Criminal Justice Act 1988. I am obliged to raise the issue that I am no member of the Stephen Lawrence family and that like them I AM A HUMAN BEING WITH FEELINGS, EMOTIONS & RIGHTS ASSURED IN LAW. The aforementioned extracts and Statutory Provisions can be accessed at human-rights with 'a link to the law' in the pages that I have now published on the Internet, as a member of the human-rights.org Community on Line. I feel duty bound to point to 'the very intentions of Parliament, and to successive governments, bearing in mind the fact that the sections have not been repealed'.

I understand that you are to receive additional submissions from Mr A Yiannides, the founder and creator of the human-rights.org Community on Line, in view of the fact that he has not benefited from an address proper in respect of the issues he pointed to in his communication, of 8th July 2004, to you..

The most disturbing issue that I first got to know of, after joining the h-r Community on Line, was/is that 'the judiciary, in our country, having granted themselves arbitrary powers, they apparently 'have "inherent jurisdiction to stay proceedings, that MUST FAIL", especially claims against the state'. In so far as I am aware none is above the law and each case rests and is founded on the FACTS PROVEN, with the judges 'simply applying the relevant law', for which 'service, to the citizens, they are retained AS PUBLIC SERVANTS', and not as absolute dictators.

I beg to refer you to reported cases, whereby INSIDERS, benefited and benefit from awards for trivial issues; one of the many cases is pointed to by and at human-rights. In another (to be released by human-rights) a police officer 'allegedly not fit to carry on with his duties, was rewarded with some £50,000.00 only to carry on 'providing services to the police in the town he served for years, but AS AN INDEPENDENT BUSINESS' after the 'reward'. Of such realities, evidently, the arrangements in place for 'the distribution of taxes that are imposed on the citizens, by the controllers of an alleged democracy.

Having pointed you to the fundamental issues upon which any Member of Parliament should be concerned with, I would like to point you to the INESCAPABLE FACTS & REALITIES which the evidence I have now published, in the Public Domain and released at my personal web-site as a member of the Community on Line, establishes:

1. The certificates establishing the SIMPLE FACT & REALISATION that I was prosecuted without due cause and or any sound evidence in respect of the allegations the police charged me: Access:

    1. http://www.lancashire.human-rights.org/

2. Attached to the above issues the element and inescapable facts that officers and staff of the Crown Prosecution Service were playing the field. In the process THOUSANDS OF POUNDS BEING SQUANDERED in respect of legal costs - rewards to the participating 'legal gurus', in scenarios that smack of the activities in the Judith Ward case. Access:

    1. http://www.uk-human-rights.org/jusblind.htm#Justice
    2. 2.2 http://www.lancashire.human-rights.org/xxxx (your father's statement about the solicitor AND THE MILEAGE, the loads-a-money to be made out of the Legal Aid Certificate)

    3. Link to ANY OTHER case you point to from the press, in the material you published OR CAN ADD.

3. Needless to say, the practices and activities are 'endorsed by one and all'. Such could not possibly have been ongoing without the blessings of the media, who occasionally 'stumble on the realisations (as the police and the courts, do) that 'citizens, like Miss Judith Ward, were/are wronged - albeit in her case WITH INTENT by 'the prosecuting legal boffins, out to secure A SUCCESSFUL PROSECUTION in order to bolster police records in respect of criminal activities by terrorists'. Access:

    1. http://www.lancashire.human-rights.org/xxxxx (your letter to 'The Guardian')
    2. http://www.uk-human-rights.org/media.htm#words (invisible services by the media to the criminals in control in pseudo-democracies)
    3. Link to ANY page you published in respect of your case that WAS IN THE PAPERS.

4. The SUBMISSIONS TO THE COURT in April 2004, were very clear and factual. Contempt to MY RIGHTS, as assured (allegedly) IN LAW also very clear. However, it would appear that precedent over FACTS ESTABLISHED WITHOUT A DOUBT & LAW APPLICABLE are of no concern to 'alleged' public servants, who granted themselves 'INHERENT JURISDICTION TO ACT IN CONTEMPT OF FACTS & LAW, which they impose as absolute dictators with or because of the apparent lack of comprehension of legal matters by the Deputies of the citizens in Parliament'. Access:

    1. http://www.uk-human-rights.org/solicitiors.htm#letter
    2. http:/www.lancasire.human-rights.org/submissions.htm
    3. Links to ALL OTHER letters / evidence covering THE OBSTRUCTIONS to your rights to UNHINDERED & NOT OBSTRUCTED RIGHTS TO JUSTICE
    4. DITTO
    5. DITTO
    6. DITTO …..THE MORE THE BETTER, Simon

5. I would like to re-iterate, and I emphasise, THE SIMPLE FACT that the Rt. Hon. David Blunkett DID ADDRESS correctly the issues that arose out of the letter that was received by the Rt. Hon. Frank Field last year. I beg also to point to the fact that the officer of the European Court of Human Rights, abandoned the assertions about destroying the evidence submitted to the court and complied with the law applicable under the circumstances. IF factual the proposals by the staff at the ECoHR, needless to say, the 'propositions were/are nothing else but the usual that indicate the cash under the table arrangement/practice, hence no need for further action / steps. Access:

    1. http://www.uk-human-rights.org/confraud.htm#(7)

6 I am re-working the final draft of MY LETTER to your Member of Parliament because of the present assertions and misrepresentations by Lord Filkin's office in the reply that was sent because of your 'relentless submissions. You simply granted them all the right to cast aside ALL CONSTITUTIONAL ISSUES that I raised and apply in ANY GENUINE democratic state.
Sincerely
Andrew Yiannides NDD., ACFI., ATI., FNAAAS
Founder - *human-rights.org*
London - UK
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
MATERIAL ADDED at:
The NEW page announced last BUT NOT LINKED TO from other pages, yet.

  1. http://www.uk-human-rights.org/convicti.htm
  2. From there you can also access the original page we published in 2002,

  3. http://www.uk-human-rights.org/chaldep1.htm
  4. When we reported to the Home Secretary/Office, the Treasury and the Prime Minister's private office our objections to the arrogant abuse of the courts' facilities for rampant constructive frauds.

  5. http://www.uk-human-rights.org/theyknow.htm
  6. NEW PAGE, not linked to from other pages, yet.

  7. http://www.uk-human-rights.oeg/4deceit.htm

The page was prepared last year following the last evil attempt by Norman Scarth AFTER HE TRIED for the third time to abuse Andrew's work as he and his chums sought to impose their evil practices as 'fraudsters club recruits'. You will find the letter from Mr Norman Scarth to be a good read AND you will most impressed with what he left behind, locked in the closet with the rest of 'the family skeletons'.

We will be forwarding copy this NEWSLETTER to a person who contacted us not long ago. We were informed: - A person, who is locked up (as a result of wrongs by the law enforcement agencies and the legal circles) is being assisted by our informant. Apparently an inmate provided the person with information ABOUT a 'solicitor' who could ably challenge it all. Apparently the 'solicitor' was a fraud and helped himself to some 9500 pounds sterling from the family of the prisoner. The 'solicitor' was/is not even holder of GCSE's, BUT he was working from within a solicitors office - JUST LIKE THE CHAP who contacted Mr Johan Michael Foenander and set him on the path to THE DOUBLE CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUDS ENTERPRISES through the courts.

All we can say us that we heard it all before and Andrew can very categorically state and emphasise that he does not need anybody to tell him where his nose is BECAUSE HE HAS LIVED WITH IT FOR A LIFETIME. In other words friends WE KNOW OF IT ALL and in particular of the 'maintenance engineers' who do a great job promoting the powers that be through the repetitious 'reports about the wrongs that even Jesus Christ spoke of 2000 years ago. WHAT 'THE SONS OF MEN' (clue) for those of you who have not accessed the new page /convicti.htm from the words CON of a VICTIm. There you should read the words attached to the Coat of Arms in the left margin/window panel. You should access BOTH Links from the words.

One takes you to the /protocol.htm page where you should read it all, NOTE THE IMAGE of Atlas and read the text attached to it. The other link from the Coat of Arms points / takes you to an extract AND REALISATIONS / REVELATIONS out of the words copied from the Old Testament.

Be prepared for surprises that might cause you to recognise WHY in our pages the words from Andrew, "A population starved of real education and sold to the page 3 mammary glands and bums, the gee-gees and 22 crazies running around kicking a leather ball. And in the meantime public servants (judicial char occupants) acting as absolute dictators as the words we have now released by publishing them at the top of a number of our pages PROVE = from their bibles.

We maintain, that so long as victims themselves ignore the rights of the citizens TO CHALLENGE BY EXPOSING THE ABDUCTORS & RAPISTS OF JUSTICE, cross over in order to join in the rampant fraud through the courts (as alleged legal gurus) AND keep it all in the family closet (the family of fraudsters they joined and join) THEY ARE PRIMARILY RESPONSIBLE FOR THE STATE OF AFFAIRS.

When GREED for greens and ego-trips are the priorities of persons who recognised and or lived through / experienced the criminal activities in the courts such persons have no right to run around professing trivia WHEN THEY SUPPRESS THE REALITIES FROM THE PUBLIC DOMAIN (just like the press they complain about) especially when they indulge in undisclosed conspiracies INTENDED TO DAMAGE OR HARM THE GENUINE CHALLENGERS, who expose it all as the draft letter covers and our pages evince.

No thank you Mr Scarth, Andrew could not even allow himself to think about teaming up with TRAITORS / RAPISTS OF JUSTICE.

Andrew Yiannides
Founder *humans-rights* NGO)
London – UK
24 November 2004

From the archives in 2001 - INTERESTING DEVELOPMENTS then and thereafter
An important Newsletter transferred in March 2008 for readers & researchers to consider
nlm01p1r.jpg (119315 bytes)

nlm01p2r.jpg (81723 bytes)

nlm01p3r.jpg (100749 bytes)

nlm01p4r.jpg (92239 bytes)

nlm01p5r.jpg (91996 bytes)

nlm01p6r.jpg (78859 bytes)

nlm01p7r.jpg (90671 bytes)

nlm01p8r.jpg (94214 bytes)

nlm01p9r.jpg (29914 bytes)

 

webmaster

Date:       Tue, 22 May 2001 13:21:13 -0600
To:            andrew@human-rights.demon.co.uk
From:       webmaster@human-rights.org
Subject:    human-rights.org Newsletter

human-rights.org
Community On Line Newsletter May 2001/1

FRIENDS
SOME DEVELOPMENTS? - SOME VIEWS
Newsletter May 2001/1

The *human-rights* Community On Line is now developing as we planned.

Victims of institutionalised Crime are coming forward from within the United Kingdom, our base. It is anticipated that even victims who were advised by friends not to publish any material on the Internet will be reviewing their own decisions NOT TO REPORT CRIMES and to suppress with intent evidence against the criminals who are in control of our society.

Visitors to the *human-rights* HomePage after visiting the National Scandal pages do not fail to recognise WHY FORGERIES WERE USED BY THE LOCAL AUTHORITIES IN ORDER TO STEAL AND MISAPPROPRIATE HOUSING BENEFIT FUNDS. No visitor can fail to grasp on the fact that the offenders were relying on other public servants - the police and the Local County Court judges - to ignore breaches of criminal Law.

The latest example of Legal / Judicial / police services from within the UK we draw attention to by publishing below the entire content of the submissions made by the victim Mr. William Spring.

Mr. Spring was not familiar with computers and the Internet, in particular. Within a short space of time he has been able to put together - the results of his first pages. His tenacity, vigor and the grasp of that which devastated his family and blighted the future of all from within it, command admiration and much more than simple understanding. His is the type of case that exposes the sycophants and hypocrites who are in control of our society, our lives and those of our children and generations to come.

WE ASK:

"Is this the society that our Prime Minister wishes to impose in other lands and counties

‘Has our Prime Minister set aside the promises that New Labour, his government in waiting, made to our founder in 1995? Have the promises been

Page 1

relegated to the trash can?"

We SAY:

Take on board the facts of the case that will he stated fully and comprehensibly by the victim at:
http://crookjudges.human-rights.org
as he develops and improves his website, we know that the victim will not flinch nor succumb to pressures from abusers of the corrupted legal and judicial services from within an allegedly "civilised democracy that, allegedly, is founded and rests on law and order".

Consider the submissions below, and visit the victim’s web-site. Feel free to distribute this Newsletter.

Andrew Yiannides
human-rights (NGO)
London - UK
22 May 2001

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

THE VICTIM'S

MEMBER’S SUBMISSIONS

Immediate Release - cana.london@ic24.net

http: /crookjudges.human-riqhts.orq/

From

William Spring 83 Black Boy Lane London N15 3AP

Tel : 2088022144 ( + fax)

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

UK GOVERNMENT JACK STRAW & METROPOLITAN POLICE C)MMISSIONER ACCUSED OF BEING ANTI-FAMILY SOFT ON CRIME & THE CAUSES OF CRIME, ONLY AS LONG AS THE CRIMES ARE COMMITTED BY LAWYERS.

- CALL FOR AN INDEPENDENT COMPLAINTS SYSTEM -

William Spring of the Community On Line the human-rights org comments:

"This morning 18th May I heard Jack Straw on the radio talking about crime. What he said has no relevance. In my area Tottenham I am not bothered about street crime. What has devastated our family are crimes committed by lawyers, crimes endorsed & concealed by the Police, judiciary, Lord Irvine & The Law Society. Anti crime measures should not be class based. As the lawyers can’t clean up their act up, let someone else do it for them. The Blair Government soft peddles on crime & has broken the promises made before the last election about combating this particular category of crime simply because Blair & Cheri are themselves lawyers. I paste below a letter sent yesterday to Law Society President Michael Napier."

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

In the letter William Spring calls for his complaint against Law Society solicitors

Page 2

Beachroft Wansbrouohs (BW) to be considered by an independent panel not connected to The Law Society. He slates the Government for "protecting judicial monsters who persecute families, who steal their assets, & who don’t give a dam about real people being set upon by real thugs, i.e. your Law Society members."

"Ac independent Complaints bureau v Lawyers was promised to us before the last election by the New Labour Government, as it also promised to eliminate fraud & waste from the legal system."

Noting "it hasn’t delivered," William Spring says: "while we are waiting to see what happens re their next lot of promises, I ask that this particular complaint, as it involves your own solicitors, be considered by an independent panel not directly connected to the OSS. This is in accord Article Six of the Convention."

His original complain re BW was that the firm is seeking to obstruct justice "by implementinq a costs award only when they were tipped off by The Metropolitan Police that I had decided to commence a private prosecution against the firm Williamson & Soden" (W&S).

He has told the Law Society President & the OSS that he has further complaints "specifically that SW chose to represent fraudsmen, & made no endeavour when they were given instructions by The Law Society insurance division to represent fraudsmen, to find out whether any of my allegations were true or not.’

William Sprinp acknowledges the difficulties of lodging such a complaint re BW: " if I have a legitimate criticism that BW were choosing to represent fraudsmen, & made no endeavour to find out whether my allegations had any substance, then as they took their instructions from the SIF, it would appear that the Law Society itself chose to represent fraudsmen."

He says he gets round that objection by conceding "although it is true that the Law Society does have a distinct policy of representing fraudsmen & solicitors against whom criminal charges can be made, this in itself does not extenuate BW, as they had their own liability to investigate my charqes.

William Spring says "how it is that The Law Society acquired this mandate, which it rejoices in, to represent fraudsmen & criminals, is one or the greater mysteries of our civilisation."

He points out that when he first made a complaint to the OSS he was told " it could be investigated as it raised issues of law & of conduct.
Page 3

" So I went to Court, as I was encouraged to do by the OSS.

"Then when I got into the Court up popped BW, with instructions from the SIF!

"When I queried the propriety of the SIF policy a Mr. Salt of the SIF wrote to me & said he had done an investigation & was convinced W&S were not fraudsmen.

William Spring says: " what sort of investigation was that? Mr. Salt did not sit with a tribunal, nor did he listen to my representations.

The Law Society is willing to do " anything in its power to stop the truth coming out," & adds notwithstanding the costs demand "nothing will stop me lodging these Informations."

The Law Society & BW by implementing the costs award, preoccupying me with these matters can thus attempt to delay the summonses, in the hope that they will be inadequately prepared, or lack sufficient evidence.

Such a stratagem in effect constitutes an attempt by BW (& The Law Society) to obstruct & deny justice, which is why I want BW investigated, as the integrity of this prosecution should be retained, whatever the status of the prosecutor. Most of these summonses with supporting evidence would have been prepared weeks ago were it not for BW.

William Spring tells the President that he is "outrage by the behaviour of The Law Society" more concerned with its costs than with the protection of the public from criminals.

"Equally Lord Williams of Mostyn (the Attorney General seems more concerned with cosyinq up to the judges than protecting families from their depredations.

Spring asks: "what do you expect us to do? These people have walked off with everything my father ever worked for. Do you think this was an accident?"

William Spring states he is preparing a private prosecution versus 2 partners of W&S in relation to (inter alia) contempt of Court & of the law, false accounting, non disclosure/falsification & suppression of accounts & documents, false statements, theft, obtaining pecuniary advantage by deception, obtaining property by deception, embezzlement, forgery, fraud, conspiracy to defraud, blackmail, obtaining services by deception, evading liability to make a payment, criminal negligence, extortion, conversion of assets, appropriation of assets, perjury + "

Page 4

various other contraventions of the criminal law in respect to trusteeship & law pf property & the production of false instruments."

He criticises the Police, (His web site

http://crookjudges,human-rights.org attacks Metropolitan Police Commissioner John Stevens QPM for refusing to order an investigation into his charges v W&S. "What a waster! 'This man's constantly on trips - ( soft on crime & the causes of crime!' - only as long as it is committed by his mates!)

He tells Michael Napier the lack of Police investigation means that he is disadvantaged "….(in that) there are some charges I would like to prefer relating to the theft of the entire contents of the family home, which I cannot pursue in the absence of a (Police) investigation."

He says the judges who have covered matters up & prevented him from bringing a civil suit of fraud - W&S have a "group solidarity & indifference to ethics" (which) "rivals that of the KGN", but believes such crook judges will be "thoroughly & comprehensively discredited at the end of the day".

On re-reading the letter he withdraws his comparison with the KGB, as a slur on a fine organisation. "The Soviet KGB had high standards of patriotism & moral purpose. UK judges have no such code of ethics ; they are nihillists aiming to destroy society. A better comparison would have been with the Gestapo. I have yet to encounter an honest judge. Well…. I did meet once, but that was in Zimbabwe, & there was a District judge I met here who seemed honest, which is why he remained a District Judge."

He closes his letter to Michael Napier by saying his eventual vindication will not bring back his wife (killed by the stress of the case) " nor will it give my children a new start in life, having been brought up in poverty, to the general gratification of Lord Williams of Mostyn, & this Labour Government, who choose to protect the rich & powerful & judicial monsters who persecute families, & steal their assets, and who don't give a dam about real people being set up by real thugs, i.e. your members."

ends.

Copy of letter follows:

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

To the Law Society

President Michael Napier

From

William Spring 83 Black Boy Lane London N15 3AP

Page 5

Tel: 02088022144

cana.london@ic24.net

Dear Mr Napier

    I have made a complaint to the Office for the Supervision of Solicitors (OSS) which "is an establishment of The Law Society".
    My complaint is against a firm of solicitors in Birminqham called Beachcroft Wansbrouqhs (BW). I made the complaint on May 11th 2001 & sent the complaint by fax.
    To that original complaint (that Beachcrofc Wansbroughs are seekinq to obstruct justice, by implementing a costs award only when they were tipped off by The Metropolitan Police that I had decided to commence a private prosecution against the firm Williamson & Soden W&S)      I have now further complaints to add; specifically that Beachcroft Wansbroughs chose to represent fraudsmen & made no endeavour when they were given instructions by The Law Society insurance division to represent these fraudsmen, to find out whether any of my allegations were true or not.
    There are however two problems about my complaint:
Problem One.
    If I have a legitimate criticism that BW were choosing to represent fraudsmen, & made no endeavour to find out whether my allegations had any substance, then - as they took their instructions from the SIF, it would appear that the Law Society itself chose to represent fraudsmen.
    I get round that objection by saying that, although it is true that the Law Society does have a distinct policy of representing fraudsmen & solicitors against whom criminal charges can be made, this in itself does not extenuate BW, as they had their own liability to investigate my charges.
    How it is that The Law Society acquired this mandate, which it rejoices in, to represent fraudsmen & criminals, is one of the greater mysteries of our civilisation.
    When I first made a complaint to the OSS I was told that it could not be investigated as it raised issues of law & not of conduct.
    So I went to Court, as I was encouraged to do by the OSS.
    Then when I got into the Court up popped BW, with instructions from the SIF!

Page 6

    When I queried the propriety of the SIF policy a Mr. Salt of the SIF wrote to me & said he had done an investigation & was convinced Williamson & Soden were not fraudsmen.
    What sort of investigation was that?
    The OSS says it will not investigate fraud, & then the insurance division does investigate it, or at least says it does.
    But in making this decision to indemnify them & to acquit them of fraud Mr. Salt did not sit with a tribunal, nor did he listen to ray representations.
    Anyway the point is, What sort of investigation was that?

A second problem
    re my complaint to the OSS is this: I want an investigation of solicitors, but the body I am asking to do the investigation is the body which gave these solicitors their instructions!
    Is this not absurd?
    I demand an independent complaints body.
    This was promised to us before the last election by the New Labour Government, and it also promised to eliminate fraud & waste from the legal system. But it hasn’t delivered.

    While we are waiting to see what happens regarding their next lot of promises, I ask that this particular complaint, as it involves your own solicitors, be considered by an independent panel not directly connected to the 0SS.
    This is in accord with Article Six of the Convention.
    I also ask that I be allowed to get on with working out my summonses.
    Replying to your costs demand is quite a procedure, & has necessarily distracted me from pursuing with the same concentration as before the summonses I am preparing against two partners of Williamson & Soden & which relate (inter alia) to contempt of Court & of the law, false accounting, non disclosure/falsification & suppression of accounts & documents, false statements, theft, obtaining pecuniary advantage by deception, obtaining property by deception, embezzlement, forgery, fraud, conspiracy to defraud, blackmail, obtaining services by deception, evading liability to make a payment, criminal negligence, extortion, conversion of assets, appropriation of assets, perjury + various other contraventions of the criminal law in respect to trusteeship & the law of property & the production of false instruments.

Page 7

    You realise too that I am disadvantaged in that the Police have flatly refused to begin an investigation, & there are some charges I would like to prefer relating to the theft of the entire contents of the family home, for example which I cannot pursue in the absence of such an investigation.
    Most of these summonses with supporting evidence would have been prepared weeks ago were it not for BW.
    I am outraged by the behaviour of The Law Society. You’ re more concerned with your costs then with the protection of the public from criminals. Equally Lord Williams seems more concerned with cosying up to the judges than protecting families from their depredations.
    Nothing will stop me lodging of these Informations. You can of course attack me through bankruptcy, and endeavour in this way by implication to discredit the charges I am bringing to Court.
    Such a stratagem in effect constitutes an attempt by BW & The Law Society to obstruct & deny justice, which is why I want BW investigated, as the integrity of this prosecution should be retained, whatever the status of the prosecutor.
    I emphasise I always sought an amicable settlement. It is the obtuse behaviour of the judges, who act as godfathers in a criminal conspiracy, which has caused you not to take my allegations seriously.
    But what do you expect us to do? These people have walked off with everything my father ever worked for. Do you think this was an accident?
    It seems to me that The Law Society will do anything in its power to stop the truth coming out but I can assure you that the argument has only just begun.
    Whatever happens I will not be deflected from my aim, & demand that my charges be considered by a jury.
    That Judge Buckley & LJ Buxton have frustrated me in this objective is regrettable, & has delayed things, but both judges, together with others on the bench, whose group solidarity & indifference to ethics rivals that of the KGB, will be thoroughly & comprehensively discredited at the end of the day.
    Such a vindication of course will not bring back my wife, (who W&S killed), nor will it give try children a new start in life, having been brought up in poverty, to the general gratification of Lord Williams of Mostyn, & this Labour Government, who choose to protect the rich &

Page 8

powerful & judicial monsters who persecute families & who steal their assets, & who don't give a dam about real people being set upon by real thugs, i.e. your members.

I am copyinq this letter to the OSS.

Yours sincerely

William Spring

========================================
Community on Line web-site
http://crookjudqes.human-rights.org

========================================

--

webmaster
human-rights organisation
protecting and promoting
Human Rights World Wide
 
Remember:

" Do with, by and for yourself that which pleases you,
as long as that which you do does not infringe upon
or violate the rights of any other."

 

FOOTNOTES
    1.     Evidently no one has ever bothered to consider the relevant factors that apply to such scenarios. No one has ever taken on board the simple fact that a solicitor, no more no less, acts as an agent for the client. There arise also the added elements of (a) a solicitor (as the professional in the relationship and contracted retainer) is responsible for all work executed and accountable to the principal, the client. (b) A solicitor is responsible for the brief and instructions passed on to a barrister. (c) A solicitor is responsible for the actions and defaults of an agent who acts for the solicitor in court proceedings. NO ONE HAS EVER RAISED THE ISSUE OF 'Fraudulently acting / indulging agents'. Visitors are urged to access the blunt forgery that a solicitor promoted to Andrew, the founder of *human-rights* over three decades ago (*Link). That professional who was / is licensed to practice law, by the criminals who issue practice certificates to solicitors in England & Wales, asserted to the founder of *human-rights* that in view of such evidence, his client's (Andrew's) case stood no chance at court. That fraud of a professional simply recommended to Andrew to abandon a case of commercial fraud. Thereafter no one, including the police, from the lowest to the highest ranks up to the Commissioner for the Metropolitan Police, Members of Parliament or Minister concerned themselves with the issue of a forgery created. promoted and used for the corruption and perversion of Justice. Visitors to this page and ALL OF THE CHARLATANS, STOOGES & FRAUDSTERS CLUB RECRUITS (named above) also others who are not included but nonetheless indulged in cat and mouse games are invited to access the blunt forgery that the legal circles used for arrogant Corruption of Justice. Those who acted, as instructed, and or as retained agents of the abductors and rapists of Justice (or their under cover agents, such as leaders of organised victims groups) and persons who were used as ego-tripping dreamers, those who were/are planning with others (such as the LIPS crowd/mob) to go about 'offering alleged legal services to targeted victims', persons who are acting as the Hussein and Malcolm Glynn chaps whom all LIPS (Litigants In Person Society) members knew of and associated with over the last 10-12 years, are urged to access the forgery and then to access and consider the rights of the victims of crime, THE RIGHTS OF THE CITIZENS WHO ARE ENTITLED TO THE PROTECTION OF THE LAW in accordance with the principles published in the exclusive page all can *Link to.
    2.    Visitors can link to a case of free-for-all and repetitious attempts at denials of rights to a targeted victim. Abuse of the courts facilities with 'blunt and arrogant racial discrimination'. Blatant defaults by police officers (all levels and ranks) who, like the county court staff and officers, also indulge in fraudulent misrepresentations and misconduct in public office. Everyone acting so, in order to achieve pre-determined goals for the targeted : to impose their terms and to create conditions that serve their plans for their victims. Police Officers, County Court staff and officers, Magistrates Court administrators and officers. Also the Lord Chancellor's Office and Department. ALL acting in concert, the cog-wheels of CIUKU Enterprises. Visitors can read HOW each vile attempt was challenged by the targeted victim who, nonetheless had to endure the invasion on and abduction of his life and the denial of rights to a life as planned by the targeted victim, for himself and his family. Access and read of the imposed 'forced labour' : the work necessitated to challenge the activities of THE CRIMINALS WHO HAVE BEEN IN CONTROL, for centuries, in pseudo-democracies; the false states which the media barons misrepresent as the genuine article to the naive and gullible. (*Link to the full story - briefly stated with more than enough to raise awareness and concerns for anyone who desires true and factual reporting about 'life in the mother of modern Democracy). XXX 
    3.    Visitors should access the exclusive page where 'the facility in place' for the double fraud, on the tax-payers, is exposed. Alleged 'victims', persons who run around ranting about their suffering, going for the carrot (facility) in place and THEN WORKING FOR AND FROM WITHIN THE SYSTEM as alleged legal experts with one goal in mind. To use victims they are pointed to FOR THE SAME ACTIVITIES & THE DOUBLE FRAUD THROUGH ABUSE OF THE COURTS' PROCESSES. Simply the best of fraudulent conversions arrangements that CIUKU Enterprises managers contrived. (*Link to the best kept 'open secret' founded and resting on facts (the practices) and the alleged legal avenue for fraud on the tax-payers, 'care of the fraudsters club recruits'; persons who go for the carrot, not as blackmailed victims, but, as 'sold to the devil souls'). XXX 
    4.    
Mr Paul Talbot-Jenkins, received proof, as some of his like-minded soul-mates; others who are similarly suffering from a psychosis and are simply promoting their opinions (without any evidence or proof) about the Free Masons.... the Free Masons. The proof was documented and it pointed to the root of all evil, as imposed on mankind for millennia. He treated it all in the same manner as he and his chums acted (shoved their heads in the sand) ON MANY INSTANCES EARLIER (and ever since). NOT ONE OF THEM EVER EXPRESSED ANY VIEWS OR OPINIONS ABOUT THE ARRANGEMENTS (in place) FOR THE DOUBLE FRAUD ON 'the serfs', 'the shitizens', THE TAXPAYERS. We confess that we were not expecting anything else from accomplished lovers of the confidential fraud arrangements in place. HE SHOVED HIS HEAD IN THE SAND ALONG WITH THOSE OTHERS who acted similarly ON THE ISSUE OF THE DOUBLE FRAUD (*Link to the exclusive exposures) and as far as we are aware it is still buried deep in the sand. In so far as we are aware they are all KEEPING THEIR HEADS BURIED DEEP IN THE SAND, for reasons that any idiot can understand. The Evidence they received will be released in due course; we are still collating evidence on the all important element / issues of "WHO & WHAT (persons and elements) ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PERPETUATION OF THE STATE OF AFFAIRS, irrespective of the words of many a dignitary? (*Link).   
    5.    XXX  
    6.    XXX 
    7.    XXX

 

...

 

 

To HomePage

The creator of this website was inviting victims to access URrights & join him there with other victims to expose & challenge abusers of trust & public office until the providers of the facilities >ning.com< introduced new terms and conditions for the provision of the facilities. Access from here and read of the imposed states by the brains behind ning.com and consider only one element "WHY OBSTRUCT & HINDER THE DOWNLOAD of the existing material at URrights.ning.com >the intellectual properties of the creator of that presence on the Internet and those who joined him there? Read below of the unacceptable conduct and behaviour by the reckless abusers of trust, who set out to obstruct and blackmail the creator of URrights.ning

Persons who are genuinely concerned and object to the ways they were / are being treated by alleged servants of the publicand the law >in any PSEUDOdemocracy, or whatever states / conditions they are subjected to< by abusers of public facilities and public office >as we cover in our web-pages< should contact webmaster@human-rights.org for information relevant to the creation of similar facilities for INFOrmation on URrights, for facilities for URrights EUrope and for a NETwork of URrights activists.

  • APOLOGIES to friends and persons who could not access URrights following the recent changes by the providers of the facility (ning.com) Andrew Yiannides created and used the portal to create the presence on the Internet for the group of victims / challengers who joined with him to expose and challenge the arrogant and blunt abuse of public services in all allegedly civilised societies > PSEUDODEMOCRACIES <.

  • The changes related to the introduction of charges for the facilities, included the facility for ning.com to archive the material at URrights; also the facility to download the archived material to the creator's system (computer) while the creator and his group of friends considered which of the level of charges and service the group was to adopt.

  • HOWEVER the creator, Andrew Yiannides, WAS UNABLE TO DOWNLOAD THE ARCHIVED MATERIAL and all attempts to engage the providers and their staff in reasonable explanation as to WHY THE FAILURES TO CONNECT / DOWNLOAD from the ning.com servers THE ARCHIVED MATERIAL, were contemptuously ignored.

  • Emails to the Publicity, to the Promotion, to the Public Relations, also to the Chief Executive's Office merited no response whatsoever from anyone acting for ning.com

  • In the circumstances Andrew will appreciate any information related to the problems covered above. Andrew will also appreciate any information relative to exchanges with or email postings, from ning.com to existing members.

  • EXISTING URrights members, victims of the legal system, victims of solicitors and the courts should access the updated pages at .org/solicitors.htm and .org/solfraud.htm by using the links from the list below.

Below pages where we expose known lovers of it all, users and maintenance engineers of the system as is

.org/1999dfax.htm .org/1ofmany.htm .org/2lipstalk.htm .org/4deceit.htm .org/absolute.htm .org/abusers.htm
.org/account4.htm .org/actors.htm .org/actors2.htm .org/adoko.htm .org/bankers.htm .org/beware.htm
.org/blunket1.htm .org/chaldep1.htm .org/confraud.htm .org/contract.htm .org/convicti.htm .org/courts.htm
.org/corruptcourts.htm .org/crimesin.htm .org/dreamers.htm .org/evesused.htm .org/evilones.htm .org/famfraud.htm
.org/govolso.htm .org/guesswhy.htm .org/len.htm .org/mauricek.htm .org/media.htm .org/solfraud.htm
.org/solicitors.htm .org/someplan.htm .org/someploy.htm .org/thefacts.htm .org/theproof.htm .org/thenerve.htm
.org/twisted.htm .org/uaccount.htm .org/ukmm.htm .org/uwatchit.htm .org/watchit1.htm .org/yourtax.htm
  • Every single person we name and expose in the above pages elected to ignore THEIR OBLIGATIONS TO REPORT (to 'the serfs' = 'the taxpayers'), THE ABUSERS OF PUBLIC OFFICE & PUBLIC FACILITIES. All were/are relying on the Intellectual Prostitutes, from within the media, to keep it all in the family closet.
  • All, as typical twin-tongue hypocrites carry on complaining about the media for failing to report & for suppressing the facts and the realities they allegdely reported to the hard of hearing, to the otherwise committed angels blowing their silent trumpets for decades, all ready and gearing to welcome the expansion of the New World Order.
  • Of such parts the contributions from and failings of the persons we name and expose, AS IF THEIR OWN SILENCE, THEIR FAILURES  & THEIR BLUNT OBSTRUCTIONS to the work and other actions by the creator of this website, Andrew Yiannides, treated by one and all as if non-existent with the exception when the wily Norman Scarth, set off to abuse the trust he was allowed to benefit from, while his parts and questionable activities / performance were under scrutiny, specifically after HE FAILED to publish the full transcript of the Court of Appeal hearing HE WAS ALLOWED TO RECORD* [*Link from here to the food for thought page created by Andrew Yiannides, in the first instance].
  • Not one ever bothered to address the issues we expose in the explicit page, despite the fact that we have been pointing all of our contacts, since May 1992, to it all.
  • Visitors, readers and researchers are urged / invited to access and read the letter which the Hon. Secretary of the Litigants In Person Society, Mr. Norman Scarth sent to the founder of human-rights, Mr. Andrew Yiannides, reproduced in the page .org/4deceit.htm* [*L]
  • The author's statements, such as 'what for and why seek additional assistance', thereby spelling out his parts as a lover of it all.
  • Common sense dictates, that he should have directed his request to his partners in deceptions aplenty, one & all engaging in fraudulent misrepresentations AND NOTED TO HAVE, WILFULLY, BEEN SUPPRESSING, FROM THE TAXPAYERS, THE FACTS OF LIFE RELATIVE TO THE RAMPANT ABUSE OF THE COURTS FACILITIES as the failure of all to co-operate as covered and pointed to at:- [*L]. One and all fallen to the facilities for fraud aplenty on the taxpayers and the corruption of illiterates in law, the conditioned victims of the legal circles & courts who fall to the blackmail element attached to the REWARD for keeping the realities away from the taxpayers; just like the media and the Ministers responsible for the application of long existing law to the criminal activities we cover in our pages, do.
  • All the while one and all were / are engaging in the scenarios we cover in the exclusive page, which page the author of the letter which Mr Norman Scarth sent to Andrew Yiannides, afforded us the opportunity to address the issue of the contributions of his partners and affiliates in fraud aplenty on the taxpayers; despite the reminder one and all, named in the new page simply shoved it all in the dark corners of their devoid of grey matter skulls, their perverted / corrupted mind(s)

> MOST IMPORTANT <
On Sunday morning, the 19th September 2010, the Deputy Prime Minister, leader of the Liberal-Democrats in the course of the BBC TV politics programme, spoke of the coalition government's commitment to address the element of waste and fraud through the public services sector. We trust and hope that the elements we expose in our pages and the parts adopted by the conditioned victims of the legal circles, the persons who engage in PROMOTING & EXPANDING THE ONGOING CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUD ON THE TAXPAYERS, THROUGH ABUSE OF THE COURTS' FACILITIES, will be on the top of the list of government priorities.
Visitors, readers & researchers are urged to access the letters to Minister Frank Field [*L] after he had been directed by the Prime Minister to think/do the unthinkable.
Link also from here [*L] to the explicit letter to the Home Secretary in December 1998 with submissions arising out of the RAMPANT HOUSING BENEFIT FRAUD
On Tuesday 23rd November 2010, 'the Guardian' in its Comment & Debate page carried an article by Nick Clegg, the Deputy Prime Minister. In the evening of the same day the Deputy Prime Minister addressed a large audience at Kings place in respect of the government's changes on university students fees / loans.
Access from here the page where we reproduce an image of 'the Guardian' article & consider the simple fact that we, alone, have been asserting and proclaiming our objections to the theft of funds from the national budget leading to the ever-increasing annual deficit in the state's balance of payments.

ACCESS:  http://www.justice-uk.human-rights.org/ (For an important message at this Community-on-Line web-site) & thereafter,
Access also http://www.law.society.complaints.and.human-rights.org/ (Judge instigates Fraud On Tax Payers - he knows not the difference between 'imposed' & 'no undue influence'). APOLOGIES FOR THE DISAPPEARANCE OF THIS WEBSITE.It appears that the beneficiary of the work, both for applications to the courts in the United Kingdom and the submissions to the European Court for Human Rights* [*Link from here to the Statement of Facts submitted to the ECoHR], arranged with the providers of the free web space to erase the Intellectual Property of Andrew Yiannides, the founder of the human-rights Community-on-Line, without any reference to the creator of the website and owner of the Intellectual Property!
鼯font> Copyright subsists on all material in our web-site, owned by the authors of same.
Visitors can refer to these pages in any non commercial activity, so long as attribution is given as to source. License to use, for commercial or other specific use of the material, shall have been secured in writing first, from the owners of any property and material from these pages. No material shall be reproduced in any form and by any means without prior agreement and or license in writing from the copyright owners. The Press are invited to contact us if they wish to publish material in the Public Interest, As We Do.
For any problems or questions regarding this web-site contact:  webmaster
...