Crime - Organised
-Institutionalised - Corruption - Fraud - Protection Rackets, run and managed by judicial chair occupants, in a
free-for-all state of abundance. Note the all-embracing guarantee, in place but in
contempt of all law.
is dedicated to the abandoned, to the used & abused by fraudsters club recruits
victims for more of the same. The elements are covered in the exclusive page where we
point to the foundations for the rampant fraudulent activities in allegedly civilised
pseudo-democracies. We refer to the ORGANISED CRIME through abuse of the courts'
facilities, intened to lead to the corruption of conditioned morons and idiots who fail to
recognise the elements we have been pointing to since May 1992, when the managers,
controllers and organisers of the LIPS crow/mob (Litigants
In person Society) contacted Mr. Andrew Yiannides within days of lodging and
filing an explicit Appeal at Bow County Court, because of blunt and arrogant criminal
activities the police, the staff and officers at the Court engaged in, in contempt of the
law and a result of or over (*Link)
"The court has inherent jurisdiction to stay an action which must fail; as, for
instance an action brought in respect of an act of State". (And by
extension any act of any public servant who is appointed, retained and maintained by other
public servants for all of whom, the state, as employer, is ultimately responsible,
including abusers of judicial chair occupancy and hence, the billions paid out as covered
in the exclusive affidavit that visitors can link to
directly from here - *Link also to the founder's
conclusions as of 1972-75 when the great Metropolitan police were seen to be nothing
but accessories and abettors of the rampant fraud and corruption through the courts while
Members of Parliament were -as they still do- promoting the waffle that amounts to nothing
short of 'independence of the judiciary to act in contempt of ALL of Parliament's Laws in
a pseudo-democracy). Page Revised: June 20, 2012
RESPONSIBLE FOR THE STATE OF AFFAIRS,
successive irresponsible Lord Chancellors and Home Secretaries who ignored all complaints
and submissions irrespective of the evidence and the law pointed to, by the victims of it
all, the citizens who are called upon to pay taxes for the maintenance of criminals in
public office.(*Link to our
exclusive page, covering confidential fraud as arranged THROUGH THE BEST KEPT OPEN SECRET
in alleged democracies, European States. Elsewhere the foundations and corner stone upon
which the operatives built the societies of their making using the bricks and mortar we
cover in this and other pages. The visitor should not be under any illusion that the stars
in the theatrical productions, covered in this and other pages were by any stretch of the
imagination 'humans' who were / are gifted with any attributes that distinguish 'true
humans' (thinkers) from animals).
Read of [*Link to image & text]
PageChanges 1 Nov. 2004
JOIN the Community On
Line and work with others for and in the necessary challenges and exposures for the common
good. Link to Information Page
HELP US TO HELP YOU Please (*Link to plea).
The visitor's attention is drawn to the words
of Jesus Christ, attributed to Him by the editors / creators of The Gospel according to
St. Luke. Access His words to the lawyers some 2000 years ago. Many the dignitaries over
the two millennia who shared His views (*Link).
Revised: June 20, 2012*
under reconstruction - ongoing additions and improvements
VISITORS ARE URGED to
access and READ THE IMPORTANT update and ADDENDA we were obliged
to introduce in January 2002. We had no choice but to REPORT
THE CRIMES TO THE TREASURY. Our observations and knowledge of the constructive frauds
made us accessories if we kept quiet, like the alleged victims who work towards the
implementation of the schemes by the abductors and rapists of Justice, the
Goddess. You will find the addenda statement at the top of the Updated Pages File. We
are sure that you will share with us our concerns and most profound disappointment at and
with persons who adopt and promote activities which they know are nothing but downright crimes. We refer to our exclusive page where we expose (as conscientious law abiding citizens) the Confidentiality Between Fraudsters that
exists care of the BEST OPEN SECRET.
Guidelines on Navigating through the
extensive material: access instructions.
As part of the
reconstruction process our new pages and pages where changes and additions have been
implemented, the improved / amended pages are endorsed with the link 'Page Changes and the
date of the last changes. The link takes visitors to a List of the changes implemented in
the page. These include new material and links from relevant paragraphs to other or
new relevant material in other pages. For further clarification email: webmaster@
Attention is drawn to the statement, in
red characters above. It is imperative that visitors to these pages and web-site, are made
aware of the most important and crucial factor, upon which rests and is founded the
perpetuation of the rampant fraud and corruption in our society / country. Most persons
who have looked into the issues that victim-citizens relate to them (reporters and Members of Parliament, for instance) may well resolve to accept the problems as complex and not within
their understanding or capabilities because of luck of knowledge of the legal issues that
attach to the complaints. We urge that visitors should read the extract from a letter that
a solicitor sent to a client (*Link) wherein the
solicitor covered the arrangements between the administrators and the executive.
References to the realities of life, as imposed on society by the creators and managers of
CIUKU Enterprises, abound in our pages.(*Link to the founder's conclusion over 30 years ago).
However, the simple fact happens to be 'the attitudes of
those who are seen to be nothing but the frontline soldiers who promote the existing
practices through the dual roles they engage in:-
- A. On the one hand they simply relate the
problems and difficulties they encountered/encounter with: -
1. Their legal representatives /
solicitors by far the main culprits; also issues arising out of the manner with which
barristers retained and presumably/allegedly instructed by their solicitors, acted in the
course of hearings. (*F1).
2. Police officers (right up to area
Commanders) who invariably come up with such inexcusable assertions as a 'victim', Mr G
Ebert was running around promoting and 'selling' to all manner of victims and gullible
'serfs'. We refer to the letter from Charring Cross police Station in London, which you
can access in our pages (*Link to left margin scans).
There you can read also of the results when that promotional material was challenged as
the situation commanded. Mr G. Ebert may have denied Andrew a copy of that disgraceful
letter but the matter was taken up by Mr Norman Scarth, as Andrew discussed with him,
because Norman Scarth who, as Secretary of the Litigants In Person Society, was provided
with a copy.
3. Their member of Parliament and any
Minister they apparently wrote or write to throws back at them. For the purposes of the
submissions in this page it is most important that the reader / visitor does not loose
sight of the fact that the vast majority of such 'fraudsters club recruits' (*Link to the facility in place for blackmail and 'buying
consciousness'), charlatans and stooges. Such persons, those who were sent along or
introduced to Andrew, the founder of *human-rights* knew of and had been informed of the
fact that in 1992, Andrew successfully challenged fraudulent in intent practices and
activities at a County Court (*F2). The very persons who were sending
along their tutored stooges, contacted Andrew in the first instance and offered
co-operation for the creation of data for / in 'The CAMILA Project'. The persons, Mr.
Peter Hayward and Mrs. Philomena Cullen, NEVER acted as they allegedly were in a position
to do. It should be noted that all were informed of the fact that in July 1995, Andrew
benefited from an acknowledgement (*Link to main window)
in respect of THE FRAUD IN THE LEGAL SYSTEM. No one ever bothered to enquire what preceded
that event and as a result of what work or submissions to the Prime Minister in waiting,
the Rt. Hon. Tony Blair, lead to the Spokes Person on Legal Affairs for the Opposition to
concede / acknowledge the practices. Peter Hayward and others from within the LIPS
crowd/mob (as we prefer to refer to the fraudsters) had only one goal in mind; to use the
needs of the victims of the rampant fraud and corruption (through the courts) for personal
gain and pecuniary advantage. MOST ALARMING WAS THEIR APPARENT APPROVAL OF THE
ARRANGEMENTS IN PLACE for the double fraud (*F3) on the 'serfs',
- B. On the other hand as sold to the
devil souls and 'fraudsters club recruits' they carry on ranting about the rampant fraud
in and through the courts. They do so AS CONVERTS to the facility in place, for the double
fraud on 'the serfs', 'the shitizens'. They just carry on 'promoting the practices by the
system's operators' because they are serving those interests:
1. Their main objective is to
ensure that victims they target are used, exactly as they were used, and for one goal
only. The reward under the table for those who endorse the system as is. One such
charlatan and 'fraudsters club recruit' / lover, Mr Norman Scarth even declared, in an
email, that what he stumbled upon was 'legal'. It never occurred to him that what he had
agreed to be party to was to keep quiet, take what was on offer under the table and 'be
party to, accessory and abettor to the double fraud BY AGREEING TO KEEP QUIET ABOUT IT
2. Such persons, thereafter, simply using / helping / guiding
others to go for and down the same avenue. Norman did receive a copy of the explicit
affidavit that we publish in our pages, AS A WARNING SHOT (*Link).
Johan attempted to but Norman succeeded in enticing an active member of the
Community On Line to go down the same avenue and to 'remove all of her material (evidence)
& to delete her personal web-site; just 'another sold to the devil soul'. Norman and
others who were / had embarked on the same path, at the time, were not told of our plans
for such fraudsters and the operators of the system. He and his like-minded mates (from
within the LIPS crowd/mob and other groups / movements and organised fraudsters he and the
others were rubbing shoulders with in private) ignored the fact that their intentions were
known to Andrew. Andrew had been invited to be party to their schemes/plans 'to help
victims of the legal circles' (persons they were/are targeting) as THE NEW GURUS who
learned how to play the field. Most had been made aware of the fact that for years Andrew
was looking into THE REASONS, such as WHO / WHAT were / ARE behind the perpetuation of the
established practices, DESPITE the words of Jesus Christ to the lawyers almost 2000 years
ago. Or at about 1700 years ago, when the editors/creators of 'The Gospel According to St.
Luke' were putting together 'The New Testament' (*Link).
Another charlatan, who had declared himself to be 'A Born Again Christian' was one of the
recipients of copy of the same affidavit. Recipient of copy of the same affidavit was also
the person who submitted his thoughts in the email we publish below, Mr. Paul
Talbot-Jenkins a person who joined the Community on Line as an assumed endorser of the
statement of intent "OUR AIMS". (*Link) .
We refer, above, to persons who, like the
second fraudster we list in this paragraph, after going for the carrot in place, decided
that 'it was & is all within their expectations and understanding of the law' and,
therefore, legal. That is precisely what the chum of Johan M Foenander, Mr. Norman Scarth,
also determined, as one of the many who went for the carrot dangling on a string for
persons who endorse the double fraud on the taxpayers'. Such persons, thereafter, acting
as bought and sold souls, blackmailed into endorsement of it all, stooges, who make it
their business to obstruct any other from challenging and exposing the arrangements in
place and all because they set up business as legal advisors following in the footsteps of
the Husseins and the Lou Foleys (*Link 1 - *Link 2). We
request that visitors access and read the letter the fraudster Johan M. Foenander wrote to
Mr Geoffrey Harold Scriven which we publish in support of our statement
"Institutionally Organised Fraud and Corruption". The copy we reproduce (*Link) was given to Andrew (in order to impress him) while
the fraudster was of the opinion that he was playing with a mouse. We request of visitors
/ readers to also access Andrew's response to an invitation (*Link) and the evidence relevant to Andrew's stance on
the issue of 'no association with persons who rub shoulders with the criminals who are in
control of the legal system, the courts'. (*Link also to
another page with documented evidence in support of another invitation).
Human-Rights Organisation Community
NEWSLETTER - 2004/My/006
I. Your attention is drawn to the new version of the page:
You will note that there is plenty of scope
in the page for links to material and evidence published in our pages. We do not need to
invite you to submit links to (bookmarks and anchor-points) in your pages. If you need
advice on how to create bookmarks and or anchor points, in your pages, contact us or
someone who can help you. Contact, also others who you know might wish to have links to
their pages ON THE ISSUES WE COVER IN THE ABOVE PAGE. We remind one and all that we
co-operate with ALL GENUINE challengers who are stating the facts of life and publishing
the evidence upon which they rely to establish 'abuse of public office and misuse of the
facilities available at, and through the courts'.
II. We copy-paste below a self-explanatory
letter that member Simon Muller of lancashire.human-rights.org will be posting to the Rt.
Hon. David Blunkett, Home Secretary.
We stress and emphasise the simple fact
that Mr Muller had to resort to a court application FOR Judicial Review of a decision by
the Home Office. We are sure that the Home Secretary was not and has not been kept
informed of the activities by alleged public(!) servants(?), who indulged at the expense
of the targeted and ignored victim, for over a decade now. Mr Muller, as webmaster for the
Lancashire area, will be acting as all genuine victims and those who object to the
practices should do; in other words he will be reporting and exposing the full sordid
story of his life in the public domain.
A reporter from a national newspaper
attended the hearing/presentation on 29th April 2004. At the time the reporter indicated
that newspaper editors and reporters 'would rather report the issues taken to them in
'their own way'. We pointed to the victim and the reporter the 'clearly stated facts of
life, as acknowledged by an insider:
Present at the time was a victim, for whom
the paper produced only a half-baked potato in his case. He, we are informed, has been
preparing for his own exposures on the Internet. We look forward to his march and
onslaught on the offending abusers of facilities through the public services and the
III. We have published a simple statement
of facts arising out of the disputed Protocols of the wise men of Zion. Common sense and
realisations founded and resting on historical facts, also published and promoted
religious teachings and works are but the solid ground upon which we rest our fair
comments and sound views. The page we release can be accessed at:
The page should be read in conjunction with
the material and the introduction to 'the family of man' which can be access at:
For the above web-site Andrew needs to
secure a copy of a video production, by Clive James (Watchmaker 1999) believed to be 'The
Night Of A Thousand Years'. Use of an Old Master, a painting depicting the Garden of Eden
expulsion event was part of the backdrop to a scene in the TV production. Andrew needs to
study the Old Master's presentation / interpretation of that biblical event. We are sure
that you will have noted the references to the biblical story, in the page we have now
up-graded. We have done so in order to meet with our strategy and plans, as to, 'how best
to expose and challenge abusers of public office and the trust placed in them by the naive
and gullible'. Any assistance leading to securing a copy of the video production and or
leads that could secure a good photographic reproduction of the Old Master, as used for
the above Television production, will be greatly appreciated.
draft of the letter, as settled for the member of the Community on Line, follows:
38 Houghton Close
22 May 2004
The Rt. Hon. David Blunkett
The Home Secretary
OPEN LETTER - FOR PERSONAL
Your Ref: Elected to serve the
My Ref: Obstructions to / Denial of Rights Assured in International Law
Re: Attached, self-explanatory, copies of communications.
As with this letter all are executed / transferred in Braille for your personal attention:
1. Letter to the Administration Court / office at the Royal Courts of Justice, London,
2. Letter to the Mechanical Records Department at the Royal Courts of Justice, London,
3. Letter to the Civil Appeals office at the Royal Courts of Justice, London,
4. My letter of ............., to my Member of Parliament, the Rt. Hon. ........., who, I
have been informed, has communicated his concerns, to you personally.
I beg to refer and draw your
personal attention to the following material that is published on the Internet at:
where an explicit letter to the Rt. Hon. Frank Field MP, ex-Minister, is published. The
letter points to a number of very serious issues indeed.
In particular the material facts and the evidence pointed to in the pages/material, published at the
site and other web-sites, leads one to conclude that the free-for-all, and fraud on the
public, is systematically imposed through the legal circles. An abused legal system and
the courts services, wherein THE ADMINISTRATORS ACT IN CONTEMPT OF THE EVIDENCE PRESENTED
TO & BEFORE THEM and, alarmingly, IN CONTEMPT OF PARLIAMENT'S LAWS!
resting and founded on law
where the activities and participation of the alleged victim, in the rampant DOUBLE FRAUD
ON THE TAXPAYERS, was and will be seen in all its magnificence when all the evidence will
be released for the public and the world at large to access. I was given to understand
that the alleged victim was ONLY INTERESTED IN THE CASH UNDER THE TABLE that is covered in
the exclusive page:
where THE FACILITY FOR THE RAMPANT DOUBLE FRAUD ON THE TAXPAYERS is exposed. Billions of
taxpayer's funds distributed through organised crime via the courts and the legal system.
In the meantime genuine victims of the abusers of public office shunned and relegated to a
pittance of an existence. Forced labour imposed, because of the need to chase abducted and
raped daily, (up and down the country) in our courts, Justice. Surviving on Social
Security (because of the maligned abuse of position by public servants) while 'licensed
criminals' silver-line their pockets through abuse of the legal system with the blessings
of the police (the main culprits in the destruction of my family life and health).
where Parliament's provisions, under the Criminal Justice Act 1988 are pointed to. TORMENT
& TORTURE THROUGH ACTS OR OMISSIONS, defined clearly.
Sir, I have no doubt that you
meant every word in your article, which the London Evening Standard published, as
reproduced at and by human-rights in the first page (URL) that I point to above. I am also
sure that the Rt. Hon. Prime Minister and other members of the cabinet will duly consider
the wrongs imposed on me through abuse of public office, just as I am sure that New Labour
WILL DELIVER JUSTICE out of the dungeons of the much abused courts and legal services.
Thanking you, in anticipation of
your considered approach and directions to your subordinates, and to the police, whose
prime duty HAS ALWAYS BEEN, TO INVESTIGATE CRIME PROPERLY, before presenting inexcusable
and unjustified 'cases for prosecutions' to the Crown Prosecutions Service.
There is no doubt in my mind that
by far the worst of elements in all that I was subjected to was 'the gravy train facility'
THROUGH WHICH THE LEGAL CIRCLES WERE SILVER LINING THEIR POCKETS through abuse of the
Legal Aid funds while ruining and destroying my life.
ENCL. As text.
NOTE PLEASE that we will gladly incorporate
a small image, the same size as the one we use at the top (left margin) of most of our
pages. Provide us also with a link to your material and a few words by way of introduction
(for inclusion in our FOOTNOTES) and we will incorporate it in the new version of the
London - UK
25th May 2004
/end of Newsletter to members of the Community On Line
From human-rights (NGO) - London - UK
Community NEWSLETTER - July 19th, 2004
Human-Rights Organisation Community
NEWSLETTER - 2004/Jl/009
For a number of reasons we delayed communicating the latest and we are
sure you will understand as you read through this posting. Those of you who failed to
access the submissions document that was published but not released – pointed to –
prior to the hearing of 29th April 2004, should access the document now at:
The document and pleadings were introduced in accordance with the
rights of a party to ANY PROCEEDINGS under provisions of rules of Court we published in
our pages, long ago. We are familiar with the practices that ‘fraudster club recruits’
promote as part of their subliminal indoctrination routines. Such persons relentlessly
assert and promote the criminal activities THEY SPEAK OF IN PRIVATE but do nothing about
reporting the blunt crimes they know of. As lovers of the arrangements, FOR the DOUBLE
CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUDS (on the taxpayers, through abuse of the courts’ facilities) they
shove their heads in the sand every time they are challenged to address the facts covered
in our exclusive page:
Sadly we have to admit that even members of the Community on Line act
likewise, thereby raising the logical question: How genuine are the intentions of such
persons? Conveniently organised defaults and omissions’ by persons who are not content
to sell their soul to the devil for rewards arranged through the second fraud on the
taxpayers. The very persons also indulge in fraudulent representations and plenty of false
assertions attached to wilful activities in the background, in addition to the promotion
of many an unchallenged criminal activity by the legal circles, court staff and officers,
too. Reliance on the last, the cornerstone upon which defaulters and abusers of public
office work in tandem for the promotion and creation of the society of their choice and
making while ‘the serfs’ meet the cost.
A page, due for general release and access by all visitors to our pages
should be the main springboard for promotion of the work of all pro-active members of the
Community. We refer to members who publish more than just the stated facts, their
experiences and the evidence in support of their allegations and claims. We refer to
members who apply themselves to elements that arise out of the issues covered in their
pages and the pages of other members. Among the issues covered in the page, the opinions
of members (and the performance of some) in respect of their opinions as regards the free
masons. The all important issue on the use of the word ‘judicial’ for decades, by the
lovers of the system maintained and operated by abusers of public office and trust. Among
the lovers and promoters of the system, as is, the intellectual prostitutes that John
Swainton spoke of, when he was moving out of the firing line. Members who are or will be
addressing questionable and blunt criminal activities by the legal circles and public
servants should access the page:
We ask that you note the introductions published in the short
paragraphs relative to elements raised in the page. We request that you consider the
facilities for links to other pages and web-sites where the same elements are covered or
expanded upon by members and or at the sites of other groups or individuals who wish to
cross-link to our Home Pages and Community on Line sites. Members should contact us in the
event that they wish to contribute either by providing us with bookmarks / anchor points
to their pages, or to submit material for inclusion in the page.
We request that you access the letter we published in the page:
You should NOTE HOW Mr Johan M Foenander,
who was introduced by the LIPS crowd/mob, addressed the issue of ‘the protected species’
when he was writing to Mr. Geoffrey Harold Scriven. We should clarify that the person he
was writing of and about was in fact the specimen upon whom he and other chums of his from
within the LIPS crowd/mob, have modelled themselves. Members and affiliates of the
aforesaid front and set-up (for more of the same) were and have been behaving as expected
of persons who endorsed and love it all, as is. Any wonder why persons of his calibre and
mentality never applied or apply themselves to the issue of the rampant fraud and
corruption through the courts? They write of the criminal activities in personal exchanges
(as in the instance we point you to) and they speak of the activities, as promoters of it
all, in the presence of and or targeted ‘serfs’. Serfs, naturally being the victims of
the legal circles / system, who are ripe to be ‘subjected to the whims of the
corrupters, the corrupt and the corrupted’. The corrupted, of course, are none other but
‘the fraudster club recruits’ we cover in the exclusive page, 2 above. As front line
operatives of the subliminal indoctrination tactics and policy THEY ENSURE THAT THE PUBLIC
AT LARGE IS NOT MADE AWARE OF THE ACTIVITIES THEY ENDORSED AND HAVE ADOPTED.
We refer to use of the facilities, in
place, FOR MORE OF THE SAME à the double constructive
frauds through theatrical productions in the ‘courts’. We cover such a ‘scenario’,
the farce of a hearing in February 2000 at the RCJ. Thereat the facility for the creation‘
of an order of court for the silence of and by the sold souls’. We refer to those who
capitulate to blackmail, settle under the terms of the facilities in place and thereafter
indulge, exactly as the specimen / model citizen that Mr Johan Foenander was writing of to
Mr. Geoffrey Harold Scriven. In the meantime the individuals and or their tutors / gurus
(behind such scripts and scenarios) content with their handy-work and of opinion that they
had sold, yet again, their promotional handiwork to one and all including us.
We publish below two FAX transmissions we were caused to send to the
victim Mr Simon Muller, who joined the Community on Line three months ago. Members should
apply a little common sense to the realities stated in the Fax transmissions. We were
prepared for that which was to follow from and by the abusive of public office, court
officers and court staff. A member of the press, from ‘The Guardian’, the prestigious,
attended the hearing on 29th April. Mr Muller informed the reporter of the fact
that the submissions document, copy of which had been handed to the reporter, was
published on the Internet. The reporter was informed that the presence of the document,
with the explicit submissions, was not announced or released to any other. It was
explained, to the reporter, that there subsisted the need to point to readers (of the
pleaded realities) to the anticipated contempt of all evidence and applicable law by any
‘judicial chair occupant’ who was to deal with the application before the court on the
day (29th April). Indeed such proved to have been the case, just as the
anticipated obstructions to justice followed, as covered in the two Fax communications
that disclose much more and worse than what was expected, of public servants and the
1st Fax: MESSAGE
I transmit two pages (versions) of the DRAFT; one, with the text boxes
in black outline and the other changed to white ending without lines around the separate
boxes, under each heading.
Each box at the top is headed as I TOLD YOU WELL OVER FIVE WEEKS AGO.
It was after the abusers of public office FAILED to hand over the/your documents in order
to re-constitute proper bundles and THE LIST of documents. I remind you, yet again, that
the LIST SHOULD BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE SYSTEM I DEVISED OVER 29 years ago. YOU HAVE
DONE ABSOLUTELY NOTHING in the area that should establish your case to the simplest of
morons, let alone to your MP or the media girls and boys.
I ensured that you had a better and faster computer to work with and
with the right programmes too. All the work so far was executed by and at my end, while
you just keep yourself busy on the phone and in USELESS EXCHANGES with and for all sorts
of matters but NOT the issues you should be dealing with.
I made it very clear that legal matters should be treated as a chess
game. ONE MAKES THE NECESSARY & APPROPRIATE (as commanded under the circumstances)
MOVES. To that effect you were told umpteen times WHAT YOU SHOULD BE DOING IN YOUR
CASE---à YOUR CASE--à YOUR
What you transmitted as RECEIVED from Mrs Brown simply covered and
covers what the opposition ARRANGED FOR YOU and not what you were told your moves should
be. I ensured and WORKED in order to PREPARE MATTERS FOR YOU including the alternative
computer, the right programmes, the web-site, etc. Everything so far was done and put in
place FOR AND IN YOUR INTERESTS by human-rights, while you have been and are busying
YOURSELF WITH THE MOVES OTHERS DABBLE WITH, while IGNORING YOURS, as pointed out to you
weeks ago. In my letter to your Member of Parliament such issues will be raised BECAUSE,
AS YOU WERE TOLD, I AM FAMILIAR WITH ALL OF THE ILLEGAL & EVIL PRACTICES that court
staff and officers indulge in, in our pseudo-democracy FOR the free-for-all to rule
supreme. I made it clear that you should not expect of me to play in accordance with their
/ your (adopted?) moves! I told you umpteen times that IF YOU WISH TO PLAY THEIR MOVES and
by the conditions they impose on every other ill-informed 'serf / shitizen', you should do
so WITHOUT EXPECTING OF ME TO BE TIED TO THEIR / YOUR PRE-DETERMINED CONDITIONS.
WHERE IS THE LIST that should be posted both to the Home Office and the
Treasury legal advisers who should be asked to deal with the rules as placed on record in
the CPR (rules) and at the same time to raise the issue of 'abused court processes' while
relying on 'the two-liner' illegal arrangement which I pointed out to you, I have known of
for well over 30 years, which issue you set about to abuse at the wrong time and in the
wrong context? Also where is your letter to the editor of 'The Guardian'?
Andrew Yiannides NDD., ACFI., ATI., FNAAAS
Founder - *human-rights.org*
London - UK
2nd fax : MESSAGE
Following transmission of the letter you received from the Civil
Appeals Office and our telephone exchanges last night and this morning we should now
challenge the attempt to railroad and hijack the case, in the usual manner that many
victim-citizens speak of, the most vociferous ‘very conveniently’ do so only in
private exchanges intended to impress 'new victims' they target.
As you know the Community on Line is changing the scenery and the
tempo, however. You should challenge the attempt and demand of the author of the letter,
and his colleagues, to act as public servants, who should be serving the citizens in
accordance with the laws that parliament put in the statute books and various / successive
governments endorsed through international treaties and accords and 'as signatories on
behalf of the citizens' . Your letter should be as follows:
Your letter of 6th instant is hereby, acknowledged.
Your attention is drawn to the application lodged with the court on………..(date)
wherein explicit provisos were stipulated. I refer, to the issue of:
- The return (facilities for collection) of the bundles of documents lodged for the
purpose of the hearing on 29th April 2004.
- Transcript of the hearing of 29th April 2004.
- Transcript of the judgement 'as delivered' by HH Mr Justice Richards at the end of the
'brief hearing' on 29th April 2004..
Reference to the court’s letter of ………….(copy attached) makes
it abundantly clear that despite my letters of, (a) …………. & (b)
……………. the court , through the usual practices of staff retained to serve the
public, simply failed and or defaulted with intent to comply with my legitimate requests.
You will duly note that in that instance the court, through its staff, was extending time
for the lodging of the essential bundles of documents that I rely upon to present my case
to its officers, in view of the FACT that your colleagues and other 'public servants' had
been AND TO THIS DAY ARE defaulting / failing to comply with my legitimate requests.
In consideration of the above facts and realities, and bearing in mind
the existing state of affairs whereby public servants, staff of the courts have as yet to
comply with my legitimate requests in compliance with my rights', and in view of the fact
that I AM STILL WAITING for the return of all documents and the two transcripts that I
applied for, some/over (choose which word applies and delete the other) two months ago, I
now request that you refer this communication to the most senior member of staff in the
department and or directly to whosoever has assumed the right to railroad and hijack my
rights in law.
I object to reckless contempt of all
law and to my rights to access to court unhindered (as it should be) and to the
facilities warranted evidence in support of my application to the court, from the
documents lodged for diligent reference to same by whosoever was to deal with the case on
29th April 2004, to the transcripts warranted and called for in order for the
court to deal properly and as I SHOULD BE ABLE TO PROCEED without hindrance and or further
obstacles through either recklessness, incompetence and or as directed from above by
senior members of staff or even court officers.
In so far as I am aware, the United Kingdom was and has been, ever
since, a signatory to the European Convention for Human Rights. The United Kingdom, also,
happens to be a member state of the European Union, a fully fledged 'country/state' to
democratic rule and governance. In the circumstances practices of old, such as the
railroading and hijacking of any complaint before courts of law, should be abandoned.
I need only stress that the present situation (my having to challenge
the proposition to impose the unacceptable straight jackets tactics) most certainly
follows and or runs in tandem with reckless contempt of all law accompanied by wilful
suppression and or shoving of evidence in family closets. Altogether 'practices' intended
to obstruct and deny 'unadulterated access to justice and the law' to the 'citizens'. As
seen and noted the failures, the defaults, and reckless contempt of 'the law', by and or
through public servants collectively amount to nothing short of 'Justice is but an
illusion sold to the naïve and gullible by illusionists and their partners in fraud on
the public in what is stated to be a democratic state.
I hereby demand that you vacate the proposed attempt for a
pseudo-hearing of my application and that you refer this communication to the persons I
stipulate above. The court CAN & SHOULD MOVE ITSELF in order to cause junior staff
within its buildings and area of administration, to comply and meet with MY RIGHTS THAT
ARE ASSURED IN LAW - national and international.
Copies of this communication, and attached documents, are to be
delivered to: (a) Lord Falconer, Minister for Constitutional Affairs & the
Courts/Justice, (b) The Home Secretary and (c) My Member of Parliament.
ENCL; 1. (their letter of…. Where extensions were mentioned
2. & 3 Your letters requesting transcripts & application for same at public
The above should be sent by recorded delivery and you must ensure that
the letters accompanying the copies to/for Lord Falconer and the Home Secretary are sent
to 10 Downing Street, The Cabinet Office.
Andrew Yiannides NDD., ACFI., ATI., FNAAAS
Founder - *human-rights.org*
London - UK
We request that members who are familiar with the above practices
should contact others who have fell victim to those who misconduct in public office. Abuse
of the courts’ facilities, for theft of properties (through conversion of assets, via
alleged legitimate legal costs) is being addressed through the only OPEN COURT on planet
earth à THE INTERNET. Rights assured in law, are sold in
pseudo-democracies by intellectual prostitutes who just blow their out of tune trumpets.
Such rights are hijacked and stolen by public servants while ‘fraudster club recruits’
engage in ‘subliminal indoctrination tactics, arrogant promotion of the abusive of
public office ‘power-mongers’ and they partake in more of the same à FOR the intended DOUBLE FRAUD on the taxpayers.
Founder *humans-rights* (NGO)
London – UK
20th July 2004
|Human-Rights Organisation Community on Line
NEWSLETTER - 2004/Au/012
We rushed out a short update yesterday which we trust prompted you to
consider the wind of change – the fresh air from within the courts, after you accessed
the footnote we added to the page:
We were contacted over the weekend by friends of a targeted victim of the Divorce Industry, hence our hasty
posting yesterday. We copy below the main part of a letter that Andrew settled after
discussing, at length with the targeted victim, the situation and the attempts to impose
the usual on ‘the victim’, irrespective of the issues we point to in the above page.
NOTE: The ‘targeted’ will be joining the Community on Line (no
facilities at the moment) hence the reason for no names and address, below. There is no
need to pass on information in advance to the offenders, the abductors and rapists of
Your Ref: JCS GF 3295/C
My Re: FDPAOCFC
Re: Xxxxxxxxx –v- Xxxxxxxxxxx
I beg to refer to your letter of 3rd June 2004 and the
enclosed document dated 25th February 2004.
I would like to emphasise the fact that I am
not Mr Bryan Hudson, nor Mr Johan Michael Foenander or Mr. Geoffrey Harold Scriven, of
whose circumstances I was made aware recently by accessing material that is published on
It was noted that exhibit ‘AC1’, as prepared for the deponent by
‘legal advisers / legally qualified team’, representing the deponent, discloses no
income and in the circumstances I request that the deliberate discrepancy / suppression be
attended to, forthwith.
I further demand that in attending to the above request that you also
deal with the issue of ‘matrimonial assets’. A list of the matrimonial assets’ was
and remains the first issue that the deponent should have submitted / come forward with as
the applicant, whose first name, incidentally, should be / is Xxxxxxx (official records)
and not Xxxxx as recorded in the documents you have posted to me.
I hereby confirm that my marriage to Mrs Xxxxxx Xxxxxxxx, who resides
at ‘the matrimonial home’ at XX Xxxxx Xxxxx Ax, Xxxxxx Xxxx, Xxxts, XXX XXX is over. I
emphasise that I recognise no one by the name of Xxxxx as used in the proceedings you
appear to be in control of. I hereby request that, in order that we may ‘proceed
appropriately’ in these matters, that you ensure, if you are representing Mrs Xxxxxx
Xxxxxxx to attend to the relevant corrections of all records and that you meet the costs
In view of the above, I submit that as I am not prepared to go down the
paths that yourselves and others are seeking to place Mrs Xxxxxx Xxxxxxxx and myself are
not acceptable to me, and that you deal with the following, forthwith:
- Attend to the preparation of a proper financial statement from / by Mrs. Xxxxxx Xxxxxxx.
Ensure that all income from ‘the matrimonial assets’ that were transferred to ‘the
sole name’ of Mrs Xxxxxx Xxxxxxx on or about 14th November 2002, be included.
- Attend to the issue and submission to me of a full Statement, by Mrs Xxxxxx Xxxxxxx,
covering all matrimonial assets forthwith.
- Cease all attempts in furtherance of the usual practices, such as those that were at
work in the three precedent cases that I accessed on the Internet.
- Proceed to arrangements (advise Mrs Xxxxxx Xxxxxxx of my right) to deal with the issues
through mediation proper.
Copies: To Whom It May Concern.
The above qualifies that we are referring to and relying on THE CITIZEN’S
ALTERNATIVE PRECEDENT CASES. Cases that are recorded by us, as law-abiding citizens who
are REPORTING CRIMES (to the world) and to persons of authority who are prepared to
consider the criminal activities which others shoved in the dark corners of their minds
and in the family closets. Those of you who have as yet to access the exclusive page where
the most blunt and arrogant arrangement should hasten to do so now, without fail:
The arrangements for the DOUBLE CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUDS on ‘the serfs’,
were and remain offensive, constitute criminal in intent abuse of public office and, as
such, are unacceptable to us. So it should be with and for ALL DECENT LAW-ABIDING
CITIZENS. Not so for the fraudsters club recruits, who simply love the arrangements in
place. Consider the fact that the fraudster who set about abusing and wasting Andrew’s
time (as the plans of the fraudster and those who sent him to Andrew were) published and
exposed to the world, nothing. His letter to G. H. Scriven makes it abundantly clear that
he could not possibly plead ignorance of the laws that apply to the activities he and
others embarked upon and indulged in.
At the above page, you MUST read the explicit affidavit that covers ‘the
facility for blackmail’. Seen from another angle the arrangement can be seen as ‘the
carrot at the end of the tunnel’, for asses to go for. Either way the ‘fraudsters club
recruits’ ARE fully aware of the fact that by going for and ‘honouring the
confidential stipulation / arrangements in place’, they consciously ENDORSE AND JOIN IN
THE CONSPIRACY THAT DEFRAUDS the citizens, the taxpayers of billions pounds-sterling
Such persons think of and consider the millions of victims of the legal
circles and the courts as potential ‘clients’ and recruits to the system, just as the
Hussein chap (and other agents / insiders of the system) did with the author of the letter
you can read in the page:
In the letter you will be reading of ‘the author’s grasp of the
situation’ in the courts. That letter was written months after the author, and a firm of
solicitors who were representing him turned down an offer from one of the solicitors who
was party to the conversion of targeted assets through abuse of the courts' facilities and
fraudulent court proceedings. The author was overlooking the simple fact that Andrew, the
person he set out to impress, was aware of much more than just the parts that persons of
his calibre, mentality and lack of morals play FOR THE PERPETUATION OF THE EXISTING STATE
OF AFFAIRS. The fact was that Andrew was looking into the reasons, WHO & WHAT was/were
responsible for the ongoing state of affairs as of the time (and beyond) when Jesus Christ
addressed the lawyers of His days.
We point out to the fact that the managers/controllers of the LIPS
crowd/mob contacted Andrew in 1992 AFTER the developments that followed the submission of
copy of the appeal in ‘The Breeding Grounds – case’, to the Lord Chancellor. The
LIPS crowd/mob NEVER co-operated as they had proclaimed when they contacted Andrew.
Instead of working towards the creation of the CAP – data collection, through cases
being stated FOR the Citizen’s Alternative Precedent data (cases). They simply carried
on planning for the parts they were to play as ‘fraudsters club recruits’. They were
more interested in obstructing The CAMILA Project which Peter Hayward, Philomena Cullen
and others that ‘attracted their attention. For proof members should access the page:
Reading through the exchanges between the two in conversation (recorded
by the instigator of the telephone call) one is made aware of the fact that Johan
telephoned Norman with more than one issue on his mind. One recognises the fact that Johan
was seeking to create a rift between Norman Scarth and Andrew, through his assertions
about alleged libel and or the cessation of the co-operation that existed between Norman
Scarth and Andrew, the founder of human-rights.
Founder *humans-rights* (NGO)
London – UK
11th August 2004
|Human-Rights Organisation Community on
NEWSLETTER - 2004/Sept/013
We apologise for the length of this posting. We are sure,
however, that you will find it most useful and we trust that all of you, genuine
challengers, will be forwarding it to all whom you know to be or have been victims of the
rampant fraud and corruption that is organised THROUGH the legal system.
You received the submissions to a firm of
solicitors who indulged, with others, in the usual ‘antics’ used by the abductors and
rapists of Justice when targeting ASSETS and properties FOR CONVERSION through abuse of
the courts processes.
Over the last 12 years Andrew was simply
looking into the causes and reasons WHY and what / who are responsible for the
perpetuation of the rampant fraud and corruption despite the recognition of the part that
lawyers (the legal circles) play in societies. The starting point was the Gospel according
to St. Luke where one reads the words attributed to Christ according to the creators /
editors of the New Testament some 1700 years ago. (Refer to the /quotes.htm page)
The three quotes from well-known
dignitaries in our Home Pages were selected in order to point to the luck of scruples and
morals and the need for such attributes in the leaders of societies, over the centuries.
For over 12 years Andrew concentrated in one area of research, that of the existence of
Sadomasochists who run around proclaiming much as alleged victims who ‘allegedly are
challenging the wrongs imposed on ‘the serfs’ by the legal circles. In fact such
persons are nothing but sold to the devil souls who embraced the arrangements in place and
are USING and encouraging others (victims?) for the type of scenarios we cover in our
We are already naming a few of these persons, who we refer to, as ‘fraudsters club
recruits’ for obvious reasons. Among them, sadly, even persons, who joined the Community
on Line, with some of them interfering in the background, as we cover in the pages:
Over the years we were contacted and we
have had to deal with many attempts by such persons who even had the audacity to interfere
in our work and sought to use our work for their own evil ends without permission or
authority. Some even set out to obstruct our work and the Community’s aims in contempt
of the simple fact that they were/are interfering with the rights of others, the rights of
law abiding citizens.
To ‘fraudsters club recruits’, victims
who joined/join the Community because they wished/wish to expose, to challenge and to set
up proper claims against the offending authorities (by STATING THEIR FACTS & BY
PUBLISHING EVIDENCE IN THE PUBLIC DOMAIN) should be stopped. The sold to the devil souls
simply try to, and in some instances succeed, in encouraging victims to go for the carrot
at the end of the tunnel (with no guarantees) as covered in our exclusive page No. 1
above. Fraudsters club recruits and converts, however, overlook the simple factor of ‘Balance
of probability’ when indulging themselves and set off to promote excuses for their evil
parts, and worst still for coming up with naïve justifications for their convenient and
inexcusable defaults, while alleging to be law-abiding challenging (!) victims (?).
The main and initial objective of the sold
souls is to cause victims, whom they target, to cease using or to abandon the facilities
for ‘OUR AIMS’. Thus they block the victims from securing unadulterated compliance (by
public servants) with and or the victims from making FULL USE of the principles: - ‘Justice
to be seen to be done and JUSTICE TO BE SERVED in open courts. In the meantime, the two
constructive frauds on the taxpayers are covered in our exclusive page which ALL failed
and fail to address as silent endorsers of it all.
We publish below an exclusive letter that
we settled for the divorce proceedings victim who was targeted with the usual antics, as
covered in an earlier NEWSLETTER posting. We wish to inform members that while the victim
was to receive a Court order that qualified the following:
- The Interim Third Party Order is discharged.
- The application for Third Party Debt order is discharged.
- The Hearing for 3rd November 2004 at 10am is
THE VERY offending abusers of facilities
and users of created scenarios were indulging in new antics.
We copy below a communication that was
warranted under the circumstances. We ask of members to duly consider the implications and
to contact any persons they know of who have been the victims of ‘the divorce industry’
the flagship of CIUKU (Crimes Incorporated UK Unlimited) Enterprises.
Copy of the NEW submissions, follows
Re: xxxxxxxxxxxx –v- xxxxxxxxxxxx
My letter of 9th August 2004
merited no acknowledgement and benefited from no response. In the afternoon of Friday 10th
instant, my employer was handed some documents and as a consequence I am acting
appropriately. I transmit this communication with 39 pages of material that I accessed and
printed from the Internet. The material is transmitted in support of my challenges at the
attempts to indulge or seek with others to use ‘created scenarios’ through which to
impose the usual activities for conversion of targeted properties and assets, through
abuse of the courts’ facilities.
Pages 2 to 39 the printouts from material
that I accessed on the Internet and printed for reference to, I submit with only part of
the file/folder and the elements covering law, practices and argument as to my rights at
and in law. Other elements, than the ones I point to now, for and in each document/page
ARE OF RELEVANCE but I contain myself to just one or two issues for the purposes of this
communication. The documents transmitted are numbered in the top right hand corner and
- Number 1 is copy of a short statement from my employer
wherein he clarifies and qualifies precisely that which I stated in my earlier
communication and re-iterate above.
- Page 18 (of 19 printed) from the file /corruptcourts.htm
for reference to by you and any other interested or concerned party. I specifically draw
your attention to the 1st paragraph of the FOOTNOTE.
- Page 1 (of 10 printed) from the file /yourrights.htm
wherein clear references to rights that are assured under the European Convention and the
Treaties of the European Union. Needless to say the element of ‘properties and due
process of law’ as provided for under the ECoHR, the First Protocol is of the essence in
respect of the attempts and improprieties such as my employer’s statement covers (copy
document number 1 above).
- Page 5 (of 10 printed) from the file where the provisions of
Article 29 of the Combined Treaties of the European Union are pointed to, among other
- Page 3 (of 6 printed) from the file /chancellor.htm
where among other issues a letter to the Lord Chancellor (in 1998) and a facsimile
transmission to the European Court of Human Rights are published. References to responses
and to other consequential actions are published in the file. Among the issues ‘the
right to life of one’s own planning and choice for one’s family and self, naturally.
6-7. Pages 4&5 (of 6 printed) from the
file /chancellor.htm where pointed to are (a) the 2nd page of the letter
to the Lord Chancellor, (b) the response and compliance to the citizens expectations from
the court (ECoHR) because of the submitted legal arguments.
8-12. Pages 7, 8, 9, 11, 12 (of 19 printed)
from the file /corruptcourts.htm wherein among the issues pointed to, the
following: - (a) charlatans who are organising and leading groups of victims of the legal
circles (as the issues covered in the appeal, the core element of/in the page). (b) A
victim who had agreed to be party to the second fraud on the taxpayers, already, indulging
in theatrics, fraudulent misrepresentations aplenty, in order to secure assistance
including the appeal that is published in the page. The victim conveniently failing to
proceed with the appeal for obvious reasons to persons who are familiar with the
activities / practices. (NOTE: the second fraud on the taxpayers is covered in another
page at the site). (c) Reference (in the first paragraph of the Appeal) to a used vehicle,
such as the situation in the case at hand, which I set off to challenge in the first
instance through my letter of 9th August 2004. In page 8 pointed to (among the
other precedent cases) the Myers –v- Elman – case, that lead to the introduction of
legislation about ‘wasted costs’ some 40 years after the House of Lords ruling in that
case. Among other issues stated/covered (in the file) that of ‘misconduct in public
office’, pre-arranged scenarios intended to lead to an appeal before one of the
participants in the script for the original and consequential scenario, and much more.
13-15. Pages 13, 14 and 15 (scanned images)
as printed from the file /newsflash.htm. The images are of the letter from ‘a
person who was a very conscious party to the second fraud on the taxpayers’. The
very person acting exactly as those he was complaining of and about; and the person
recklessly suppressing material facts and evidence from the public through failures to
report the criminal activities he was fully aware of.
- Page 16 is the scanned image of the letter from the
solicitors who were acting for and representing the above participant in the constructive
frauds on the taxpayers. The letter evinces the unsavoury parts of both solicitor and ‘client’,
with the latter setting out to act and behave exactly as the fraudster he was writing of
and about to Mr G. H. Scriven, to whom the letter was directed. Evidently the copy
published on the Internet was handed to a person whom the author simply intended to
impress with his excellent performance (that of the author, apparently a lousy actor).
- Page 17 is the scanned image of the letter from the Office
of the Prime Minister. It evinces the fact that the Prime Minister directed material and
submissions that were delivered to his private office to the Home Office, for attendance
to by the Home Secretary, naturally.
- Page 18 is of the scanned image of a letter delivered by
hand to 10 Downing Street. The author thanked the Prime Minister for recognising the
simple fact that the activities covered by the submissions and the supporting evidence (as
delivered to his office, earlier) were criminal activities.
19-26. Pages 1, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 (of
12 printed) from the file -/office.htm, where the submissions to the Rt. Hon. Frank
Field MP (ex-Minister) are published along with the explicit article by the Home Secretary
within days of the submissions reaching the Member of Parliament.
27-34. Pages 1, 4, 6, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17
(of 19 printed) from the file /corruptcourts.htm more of the pages where the
explicit appeal is published that covers the activities at and in the courts, as arranged
by the operatives. The imposed wrongs many, and the issues raised even more. The most
offensive of the activities that of the second fraud on the taxpayers as arranged between
the operatives and the corrupted ‘victims’.
35-39. Pages 7, 8, 9, 11, 12 (of 13
printed) from the file /newsflash.htm where the scanned images of the letters
referred to above (13 through to 18). In the pages (file) facts and realisations covering
the activities at, in and through the courts with the blessings of abusers of public
office and many a charlatan working with and for the administrators / practitioners either
as organised groups or as individuals who embraced ‘the arrangements in place’.
In view of the above and in conformity with
the directions / preferred activities (refer to the FOOTNOTE at
the copy numbered 2) that ANY divorced or divorcing couple SHOULD BE ENGAGED / ENGAGING
IN, I expect of you to act honourably in the instance at hand. I will appreciate it if you
were to consider the provisions for EQUALITY OF THE SEXES as provided for under Article 14
of the European Convention for Human Rights and advise your client, accordingly, instead
of attempting to use her as the Biblical Eve.
Copies: To Whom It May Concern.
ENCL: 39 pages x A4 as text.
We received, not long ago, information from
a voluntary group who are seeking to assist and help victims of authority. Evidently one
such victim was pointed to a reliable person, an alleged partner in a firm of solicitors
and how the family of the victim were defrauded of thousands of pounds.
The scenario brought to mind the fraudster
club recruit who was introduced to us by the LIPS crowd/mob. We simply emphasise the
simple fact that the alleged victim came along AFTER he and his solicitors made it clear
that they were only interested in the carrot at the end of the tunnel, the compensation
from THE TAX CONTRIBUTIONS.
The very scenario also brought to mind
others such as Norman Scarth and his mates from within the LIPS crowd/mob; also the
charlatans who have been guiding and USING the victims who joined/join the UKMM. We refer
to the United Kingdom Men’s Movement), to its leaders, to those who have as yet to
respond to or comply with Andrew’s demands for explanations for their part in Crimes
Incorporated UK Unlimited, after their unsolicited invitation to Andrew in 1998. Such
persons, ‘fraudsters club recruits’, even arranged to end in prison in order to act as
the good inmates who then point the targeted victims (who end in prison because of the
usual antics and activities by the legal circles and fraudulently conducted court
proceedings) to their mates outside. The ‘fraudsters club recruits’ organise
themselves into alleged ‘law centres’ that are run, allegedly by qualified experts at
law. The main objective of such persons naturally ‘the carrot at the end of the tunnel’
the carrot they point to ‘dangling at the exit of the tunnel for asses to aim for,
WITHOUT ANY GUARANTEE that it will be there. In the meantime years of frustration, torment
and torture and to hell with all of Parliaments laws because judicial chair occupants have
‘THE inherent jurisdiction to stay proceedings that MUST fail, especially if claims are
against the state’. The most offensive of frauds on the taxpayers, the undisclosed
provision by the administrators (?) of the law as approved, apparently by the Executive,
our representatives in government.
WAKE UP BRITAIN & VICTIMS OF AUTHORITY
We leave members and recipients with the
above closing statement to ponder upon. We inform you all (other recipients of this
NEWSLETTER too) that we will be releasing information about other charlatans, fraudsters
and abusers of our time whose only aims were to either cause us to co-operate with them
and the fraudsters club they joined or were working with and for. All failed/fail to
consider Andrew’s resolve after benefiting from the facts stated and the evidence
pointed to as covered in the page:
In the meantime, many, like the alleged
victim whose parts are covered in the ‘Divorce Lawyer Admits Fraud’ page / case’,
such persons carry on promoting the usual false assertions and fraudulent
misrepresentations about their own attitude towards the criminals who abducted and are
raping Justice routinely. Such persons fully aware of the fraudulent in intent activities
in courts maintained by an allegedly democratic state. We have no choice but to remind one
and all that the said state is run, allegedly, on principles of law and order, the state
that the CHARLATANS & FRAUDSTERS’ CLUB RECRUITS fight tooth and nail to keep as is,
because they act as maintenance engineers.
The desert for this posting is as bitter as
they come: Be advised, friends, that our judicial chair occupants have THE ‘inherent
jurisdiction to stay proceedings in action that MUST fail especially an action against the
We suggest that you refer to the founder’s
conclusions well over 30 years ago, which you will find at:
Refer to and consider the submissions,
which the targeted victim forwarded to abusers of the courts’ processes, and look up the
facilities, in place, for the inclusion of names of offending abusers of trust:
- Members of Parliament
- Occupiers of judicial chairs
- Any other public servant
The activities that you know of should be
uppermost in the minds of ‘genuine and challenging ‘victims’, now.
We point out yet again to the short update
which we trust prompted you to consider the wind of change – the fresh air from within
the courts, which is the first element we also point to the solicitors in the present
submissions, the footnote that we added to the page:
Founder *humans-rights* (NGO)
London – UK
8th September 2004
protecting and promoting Human Rights World Wide
Go to: http://www.members.human-rights.org and JOIN
the Community On Line - Help Rescue 'Justice & Democracy'
"The cost to the good citizens, Q: R U ?
for their indifference in public affairs, Q: Do U care ?
is to be ruled by evil men". Q: Do U approve ?
Wise counsel by PLATO, classical Greece (428 - 347 BC)
Link to: The ORIGINAL CHALLENGES
|Human-Rights Organisation Community on Line
NEWSLETTER - 2004/Oct/014
We leave the best news for the lower part of this newsletter. Please
read these most important issues because it is the start of the CATHARSIS that victims of
the TRIAD, the unholy trinity, have been waiting for, for far too long. WE NEED YOUR
PARTICIPATION as much as you need the participation and support of others, Community
members or not. Any genuine input and contribution is welcome.
We have been faced with numerous obstructions from various activists(?)
who endorsed(!) ‘the arrangements in place, for asses’ who love the carrot at the end
of the ‘dark’ tunnel. We have been and are being held pinned down as of February 2002.
Even persons who were and have been assisted over the years, and in particular by Andrew
Yiannides (the founder of *human-rights* (NGO)) do not care about and or forgot the
situations they found themselves in, after they achieve their goals.
Such persons exhibiting thus their egocentric nature and fraudulent
intentions when they contacted us or when they elected to join the fraudsters club, as
Norman Scarth went for when he was invited by others to work ‘against us’ while he
carried on benefiting from support and assistance for years. Presumably the persons have
been acting so because, as far as they are concerned, they cannot be bothered with the
rights of any other.
Paradoxically they DID expect others to be concerned and to assist them
in their personal plights. One only has to assume that such persons look upon the
situations and the circumstances under which they were assisted, as non-events. It could
also be a case of looking upon positive results, as achievements for which they are proud
because they reached their destinations via their deceitful and fraudulent intentions for
which they are probably ecstatically proud.
We do not overlook or ignore the conditions that non-thinkers are faced
with because of the arrangements in place. The means in place ‘for promotion of, and
instilling in non-thinkers the element of GREED FOR GREENS ONLY. No matter how secured,
the greens, the ladder to ‘the fraudsters club’ the only element in sight for such ‘recruits
to the system of operations’ in all pseudo-democracies.
Odd, it is not that persons, who complain about fraud and abuse of
public office end up as fraudsters, themselves. Whether they accept it or not, the fact is
that they acted & are acting as perfect ABUSERS OF THE TRUST that others placed/place
in them, as presumed ‘humans’. To new members, we clarify that by ‘humans’ we mean
– ‘thinkers’. We mean persons who having experienced the evil activities they
complained of, in the first instance, they are accepted by us as persons who are not
likely to ‘desire’ that others should go through the same routines and activities at,
in and through the courts and the legal system. As GREED FOR GREENS (albeit fraudulently
created and secured) TAKES OVER, such persons make a conscious choice to join the system
as ‘fraudsters club recruits’.
Sadly we had to point out to some such sold, to ‘the system as is’
souls, that their new selves could only be looked at as ‘perfect models of
Sadomasochists. We explained to a few (and clarify here) that persons, who themselves were
victims of the system, may have loved being tormented (as masochists) by the evil who are
in control in pseudo-democracies. We warned that their promotion and participation in
enlisting and USING others, for the double constructive frauds scenarios, was outright
criminal in intent. Furthermore they were told that the new roles they adopted for
themselves (use and abuse of the courts for the facility that converted them) indicated
sadistic tendencies because they assumed the right to cause others to enjoy the torment
they themselves loved and love.
The victims that others point them to, and they target (as we cover in
our pages), used through arrogant reliance on, promotion of the arrangements in place.
THEIR ACCEPTANCE of the double constructive frauds scenarios, as presumed legitimate
activities, while ignoring the fact that the practices amount to FRAUDS ON THE TAXPAYERS,
were and remain blunt criminal activities. One such person being the great actor Norman
Scarth. He even declared, in an email, that he found a legal way of generating income, in
his late years.
We recommend accessing the following pages:
There, visitors can read of the threats
from solicitors, and of their subsequent defaults. Such activities on top of the defaults
and obvious participation in the attempts by alleged challengers, including a ‘victim’(!),
member of the Community. Just naïve and childish attempts that were intended to cause us
to afford an allegedly genuine challenger, grounds to institute proceedings against us IF
we were to act as the toilet roll holding Privy Council material solicitors intended and
had pulled off their idiotic attempt. Fat chance, as if we failed to recognise the
mannerisms and signs from ‘a sold to the system as is’ vociferous promoter of ‘the
powers that be’, just AN EXPERT at ‘the subliminal indoctrination routines’ that the
other charlatans (named in the page) were / are engaging in. Anyone accessing the page can
recognise whom they were instructed to threaten, to intimidate and to target, as sold
evil-mongering stooges. Any ‘thinker’ can recognise what type of persons and to what
levels they stooped as alleged victims / activists / challengers WHEN SIMPLY SOLD to the
arrangements in place, FOR THE DOUBLE FRAUD on the taxpayers.
Persons who access the page should
recognise why the page is dedicated to the two named fraudsters club recruits, Mr Johan
Michael Foenander and Mr Norman Scarth; also to their mates in the LIPS crowd/mob as well
as to the affiliates of that disgraceful bunch of fraudsters. From their manager, Mr Peter
Hayward, his ‘guru’ Mr George Kay, and many others, all had been informed of the
attempts by the abusers of the court’s facilities, in that case. All were informed HOW
the abusers of public office were caused to review their foul and evil activities while
indulging in fraud after fraud at the expense of the targeted ‘serf’. Every one was
given the facts and Mr J M Foenander was shown the documented evidence in that case. just
as he saw documents from the case Korytsas –v- Demetri that took place way back in 1975.
Yet he had the audacity to puke up some foul assertions when he telephoned Mr Norman
Scarth for the evil mongering behind the scenes as covered in the transcript of the
telephone call, that is published at:
Additional profound material, covering the activities and evil ploys of
the used / guided and or sold to the system as is, engaging fraudsters club recruits, can
be accessed at:
Members should access the material in the
There we point to the fact and publish the
evidence that ‘the fraudsters club recruit, Mr Johan Michael Foenander’ had gone for
the carrot, as a typical non-thinker, an ass. The fraudster was sent along by the manager
of the LIPS crowd/mob, Mr Peter Hayward SOME TWO MONTHS AFTER SOLICITORS, WHO WERE ACTING
FOR THE FRAUDSTER, HAD GIVEN THE 2-FINGER SIGN to one of the solicitors who had been
involved in the usual constructive frauds through divorce proceedings. The aforesaid
proceedings in County Courts, and the Family Registry, had been conducted in the usual
manner. New members or members who failed to access the page:
Should do so and get to know of the facts
in that specimen of a show by the legal circles and consider also the subsequent
performance by the protagonist, the lousy actor Mr Johan M Foenander. We point to, and
emphasise, the fact that the solicitor (who turned down the offer from the offending
solicitor) DID QUALIFY, ALSO, THAT HIS CLIENT’S CASE WAS NEARING COMPLETION at the
European Court of Human Rights (Strasbourg). The very solicitor had earlier been involved
in the Housing Benefit scams we cover in our pages. We refer to the constructive frauds
instigated by public servants, the staff and officers who were handling Housing Benefit
funds at Haringey Council. Nothing unusual, because the same practices were / are part of
the Institutionally Organised FRAUD & CORRUPTION as evidence about other Local
Authorities, we publish, establishes. The abuse of the Housing Benefit funds and rents
owing to property owners simply the tip of the iceberg as far as tax-revenue and public
Flagship and the pride of CIUKU Enterprises the theft of properties and
rights through creative accounting and false instruments aplenty, as pointed to and argued
in the introduction to the page:
The implications and legal position are
clear. On the basis that ALL CITIZENS ARE EQUAL UNDER THE LAW, and resting on the simplest
of logical foundations, the following. "There can be no defence for judicial chair
occupants who deliver perverse judgements by issuing allegedly legitimate court orders,
because by the nature of their public appointments / retainers they are presumed to know
of the provisions of the law. By acting in contempt of the evidence before them, or the
truth of the matters argued before them, AND BY ACTING IN CONTEMPT OF THE LAW THAT APPLIES
TO THE FACTS ESTABLISHED IN EACH CASE they are simply acting in contempt of the law.
Judges are seen to FAIL TO ACT AS THE LAW STIPULATES, as the authorities of it. They are
noted for failing to consider the simple fact that they are public servants. As presumed
professionals they are retained and maintained (by other public servants) at the expense
of the citizens, yet more often that not, THEY SIMPLY FAIL TO SERVE THE CITIZENS ‘WITHOUT
PREJUDICE & OR ANY HINT OF DISCRIMINATION’. Thus they are seen to misconduct in
BELOW THE DESERT you should be looking for if you plugged for the lower
part of this NEWSLETTER:
Members should have received the two earlier NEWSLETTERS that covered
events attached to attempts by the legal circles, and condescending abusers of public
office, court facilities. Members could not possibly have missed the challenges, as of the
first instance, when the targeted victim contacted human-rights. The victim was just
another male, a man, and just an irrelevant father. No member could possibly have missed,
or overlooked, the fact that the solicitors and the court itself withdrew the exorbitant
and inexcusable financial demands made of the targeted victim, albeit founded on ‘false
and inexcusable instruments’.
In our last (previous) NEWSLETTER we gave you the details from the
Court’s Order after the first challenges. We also published the details of the second
set of challenges and details as to which elements, from our pages, they were pointed. NOW
we inform you that yesterday, the 14th October 2004, the targeted victim
received a court Order in the following terms:
IT IS ORDERED THAT the application is
Dated: 6th October 2004
We simply inform members that the application referred to in the new
Order was by the solicitors acting for, representing but in reality USING the woman to
whom the victim has been married for many years. It goes without saying that the targeted
victim will now be making arrangements to go on line. He will be publishing everything for
and in the interest of mankind, and as his contribution to the challenges we are to
release as made of and directed, by us, to alleged supporters and leaders of men, victims
of the divorce industry.
Founder *humans-rights* NGO)
London – UK
15th October 2004
(NGO) - London - UK
Community NEWSLETTER - November 3rd, 2004
Human-Rights Organisation Community on Line
NEWSLETTER - 2004/Nov/015
In this issue the following:
- New page created from and around the challenges that caused the abusers of the courts'
facilities to abandon their plans for 'the targeted male/man / irrelevant father. We look
to members who have been in contact with or have heard of men / fathers being ruined by
the legal system because of 'how the courts' facilities are used by the users/managers of
the legal system' to inform such victims of this very important page. (/solfraud.htm from
'SOLicitors & FRAUD').
- Another New Release - page where NEWSLETTERS are published for access to by members of
- Those of you who recently accessed the member's area (to make changes or build your
human-rights web-sites) SHOULD HAVE NOTED A VERY IMPORTANT CHANGE. After recent
submissions to the Community Architect, management team, you can now benefit from an email
facility. You can use your human-rights Community on Line web-site for email purposes.
Just create any name @your.web-site.human-rights.org as an email address. Then select from
the facility to either collect email by connecting to the password protected membership
area, or to have any email posted to 'your chosen firstname.lastname@example.org
forwarded / re-routed automatically to the email address you registered (or nominated /
changed to since joining the Community on Line. The facility should enhance your status as
pro-active human-rights activists. No member should contemplate using the human-rights.org
on its own as his or her email address without reference to and UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES
WITHOUT AUTHORITY (written agreement with us, because of any country, district, city,
webmaster services to the Community the person is offering as a whole). Anyone breaching
this pre-condition will have his or her web-site disabled. We are sure that you will
accept that no one should seek to misrepresent himself or herself as a member of the
human-rights organisation team.
- IMPORTANT CHANGES to the pages at the web-site that Andrew created for the victim of the
legal circles, whose case Andrew took all the way to the European Court of Human Rights.
You will find the changes and the information now at your fingertips most revealing. The
changes cover VERY IMPORTANT ELEMENTS & ISSUES, in particular and specifically about
persons who were/are of opinion that Andrew was a naïve mouse to be messed around with by
any cat. It is recommended that you first visit the new 'Solicitors & Fraud' page (A)
at uk-human-rights.org as an introduction to the build up towards FULL EXPOSURE OF THE
BRICKS USED BY THE ARCHITECTS IN ORDER TO BUILD THEIR TYPE OF CORRUPT SOCIETIES. You might
then recognise WHY reference to the words of Andrew's niece and the element of Greed in
the HomePage dedication panel.
- In April you were informed of the only page published at the Lancashire Human-Rights
HomePages for and by Mr Simon Muller. Presently Mr Muller with assistance from a friend is
putting together his pages and the relevant submissions to the jury at large. Naturally
the pages/material are challenges to and for Public Servants to attend to. Andrew had been
shown evidence that prompted him to inform Mr Muller that we were to use and refer to the
element that caused the founder of human-rights to conclude (over three decades ago) that
the courts were being used to impose kid-glove DICTATORSHIPS, on the naïve and gullible.
That was some nine months ago, and it is a pity Mr Muller could not have attended to that
aspect for almost seven months.
A. We are moving on from the developments last month, in the targeted
divorce victim's case. You received the two important challenges that were included in
NEWSLETTERS. We have now created a new page where we address the situation at two levels.
The first is the present invitation to the family members, which we publish in the page.
THEREIN THE EYE-OPENERS for 'any 'serf' in our country to note. The very issue applies
also in any other pseudo-democracy as sold to the naïve and gullible everywhere, by the
Intellectual Prostitutes that John Swainton was speaking of some 130 years ago. The
precedent cases briefly stated, in the page, could be the most useful facility now
available to the public at large. The second level is for the page to be used as the focal
point for our submissions to the Parliamentary Select Committee now looking into Family
Courts & Family Law issues. It goes without saying that the links to other web-sites
and web-pages are most crucial. Access the new page:
Note the elements covered. Any member of the Community who missed out the relevant
submissions / challenges can now access the content in another new page:
There you can access some of the recent NEWSLETTERS you received, which we have released
for access in the Public Domain. We have included rose-pink coloured link buttons near the
top of the page for selection of Newsletter by month / reference number.
B. If you missed out on the challenges and the results in the targeted
divorce victim's case, you can now access the relevant NEWSLETTERS. You can acquaint
yourselves with facts and the realities. 'Fraudsters club recruits' and subliminal
indoctrination stooges / operatives' can no longer ignore our work, especially with the
names of some the stars up in the limelight. Any Community member wishing further
particulars should send an email to email@example.com
C. Anyone who desires additional information as regards setting up an
email address using his or her registered and operating human-rights web-site (sub-domain)
should send an email to andrew @human-rights.demon.co.uk.
D. Access first the explicit email sent to the member at:
acquaint yourselves with some of the evidence being put together by Andrew over the last
12 years about persons who even cause their children to take their own lives (Andrew's
brother in law for example) because of personal greed for greens (money) or idiotic and
egocentric mentalities. After reading the email access and read the letter the victim
received (by registered mail). Then prepare yourselves for the affidavit she failed to
execute for almost three years (next February) while the work for and in her interests was
ongoing. Access and read the Current thought as presented by the creator of the web-site
and the legal submissions, Pleadings & Legal arguments. Then consider the simple fact
that the victim had been told Andrew was prepared for all eventualities (and the usual
from the European Court. WE HAD TAKEN ALL NECESSARY STEPS to act accordingly later. It is
immaterial if the victim just grabbed what was on offer because the elements leading up to
the submissions to the ECoHR and the subsequent exchanges WERE TO BE CHALLENGED at two
levels. One of them was to be the next challenge addressing false instruments intended to
create 'cover for the confidentiality condition for settlements', the carrot that 'turns
victims to lovers of the system as is'. WAKE UP ALL TAXPAYERS. Andrew was never a mouse,
never accepted to be party to such evil activities and frauds on the taxpayers. Access and
read the whole of the page:
Recognise HOW they all tried to entice Andrew in their world of evil and intrigue from the
architects themselves, to 'undeclared agents'. Also persons like the chap who recommended
Andrew's work to the Society of Lawyers in England & Wales. Not forgetting of course
the charlatans and fraudsters who organised, tutored or 'introduced others who acted as
tutors' to the carrot loving stooges, all managed and guided by the likes of persons we
are naming in our pages. From the LIPS crowd/mob to the UKMM shysters / fraudsters and
others who jump on the bandwagon as soon as anyone makes a bit of headway in the exposure
and challenge areas. Such persons rush in and offer their expertise as alleged
co-ordinators WHILE DOING THEIR DAMN BEST TO OBSTRUCT & HINDER ANY REAL BREAK THROUGH.
- Mr Muller was sent a banner for lancashire.human-rights.org and requested to use his
opening statement lines as bulleted punch lines. Apparently the person who was/is
assisting him (creating his pages for the web-site) was not in a position to copy and
paste each short statement (start to full-stop). We trust that you will be accessing the
site and contacting Mr Muller if anyone can help or assist him in any way. We expect the
chap who worked WITH a victim in order to create the scenario in the page /theproof.htm to
Founder *humans-rights* (NGO)
London – UK
3 November 2004
|From human-rights (NGO) - London - UK
Community NEWSLETTER - November 18th, 2004
Human-Rights Organisation Community
NEWSLETTER - 2004/Nov/016
In this issue the following:
We have now released documented evidence covering the activities of the fraudsters club
Mrs Veronica Beryl Fodden of Plymouth (VBF for short). When accessing the page members
should use the link from the top of the page and go straight to the List if the documented
- We urge members to access the /courts.htm page where we published evidence that
solicitors, barristers and judges indulged in the creation and use of a FORGERY in order
to pervert and corrupt justice. Lord Jeffrey Archer was sent down for a lesser crime than
the legal circles indulged in WITH THE BLESSINGS OF THE POLICE, naturally. Members will
duly note that in the VBH case the scenarios created by the criminals who abused the
courts facilities, the police similarly acted in contempt of Parliament's law. Thus the
avenue to the DOUBLE CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUDS on the taxpayer open to abuse by the stooge who
came along to abuse Andrew's goodwill and readiness to assist 'victims' of the LAW
- In the page you will note that we included a scan of the article covering the Prime
Minister's new plans for the citizens. We are promised, by the Rt. Hon Tony Blair and his
government, that there will be a shift away from the welfare state dependency to a state
of opportunities. With the billions that can be saved from the essential changes in
attitude and practices in the courts and THE POLICE, we can see it all coming true. As the
case will unfold the additional elements that we will be pointing to, will include
EXPLICIT challenges to abusers of public office, in other cases. We refer to fraudsters
who were / are operating within Local Authority offices who appear to be implementing
Local Authority policies. The very elements are evinced in the case that called for the
challenges and pleadings members should have accessed after we released the material that
established HOW & WHY the introduction of the Bill of Rights in 1997.
- The page where we will be covering all of the parts the actress from Plymouth (VBF) took
on as an accomplished fraudsters club recruit, is not linked to from any other page at the
site or from any other site at the moment. We request of members to access it and to
report any broken links. Members could also come forward with any links they may wish for
us to introduce from the page to bookmarks in their pages. Note please that the links
(either way) will best serve the Community's aims, if links from site to site are
contained to similar elements / activities such as for each evidence and element, we have
Contact Andrew if you need further information or assistance and
guidance for the creation of bookmarks to specific paragraphs / part of a page in your
||The NEW material / pages to access:
From there you can also access the original page we published in 2002, at the time when we
reported to the Home Secretary / Office, to the Treasury and to the Prime Minister's
private office our objections to the arrogant abuse of the courts' facilities for rampant
Access the most obvious of elements when the fraud of an alleged victim, Mrs. Veronica
Beryl Fodden, miraculously defauled to challenge and report THE BLUNT PERJURY, by the
solicitor who was representing the firm of solicitors she instituted proceedings against!
We point to the obvious and publish the evidence the aspiring fraudsters club recruit
convniently igonred while of opinion that we would also suppress and ignore the obvious :
WHICH SIDE (OF THE FENCE SHE CAME FROM & SHE WAS PERCHING WITH THE REST OF THE
FRAUDSTERS CLUB RECRUITS.
The page where we published the evidence - EMAIL & FACSIMILE tarnsmissions / reports
to government relative to the blunt and arrogant parts of the pro-active Fraudsters Club
Recruit Mr. Veronica Beryl Fodden./td>
There you can access the part of the transcript that evinces the parts played by abusers
of judicial chair occupation FOR THEFT OF PROPERTIES including the right to unadulterated
justice. The forgery used in that instance merited from the same mentality and contempt
for Parliament's Laws by the discredited Metropolitan Police.
There you will not fail to note the explicit words we have released now. We refer to the
arrangement / provision put in place, by the judiciary. It evinces their contempt FOR ALL
LAW and their arrogance for their self created right to indulge as they stipulate through
such ILLEGAL PROVISIONS, to all manner of criminals and criminal activities, as protection
racket operators. Members are urged to access the page where we published the evidence
that Andrew declined offers and refused to be drawn into the legal system, because of the
criminal activities that were/are ongoing because of the attitude of judges to all law, so
long as their contempt served other ulterior motives, objectives and or purpose.
There we published an invitation and we cover the activities, ATTEMPTS by maligned stooges
and charlatans whose love of the system as is was exhibited from the first moment THEY
FAILED to access and address the issues covered in the exclusive page,
Needless to say all known fraudsters club recruits were warned that they will be included
in the list we have been preparing for release and publication in our pages.
||The most common and fundamental issue that
nearly all cases we have been referred to or been informed of are subject to, happens to
be denial of rights, at the very least. A visit to the pages that Mr Simon Muller has put
together, as part of his challenges of the authorities will now be used as link-to
material in letters. Letters and our submissions will be despatched to officials who
failed to apply Parliament's Law to the documented evidence ha has now released for public
||The NEW member's web-site, below:
Founder *humans-rights* NGO)
London – UK
18 November 2004
|From human-rights (NGO) - London - UK
Community NEWSLETTER - November 25th, 2004
Human-Rights Organisation Community on Line
NEWSLETTER - 2004/Nov/017
We would like to draw your attention
to the content of the draft letter we settled for member Simon Muller of *lancashire* to
complete by adding the essential URL's / links as requested /guided.
The draft had been prepared initially back in August, four weeks after
our submissions to his MP, on 8th July 2004. We were waiting for Mr Muller to
prepare / publish his pages / evidence before proceeding in the matter.
Below, the draft as received by Mr Muller by FAX, after an email with
attachment (MS Word) failed to reach him.
NOTE that we will be adding this newsletter to the archives at:
where some of the recent and very pertinent NEWSLETTERS are published. As you got to know,
'the challenged divorce industry impositions, by the abusers of the courts' facilities'
The draft letter that I propose for you to write to your Member of
Parliament is intended to best present your case / submissions to your MP in tandem with
the submissions from human-rights. It should be adjusted to best cover / point to THE
EVIDENCE the jury at large -the international community- can access. EACH HUMAN (thinker)
WHO ACCESSES IT to determine, for himself, what forces are at work within our national
boundaries, in an allegedly civilised state. That said, I will appreciate your own
considerations and co-operation in how best to BRIEFLY introduce each element that the
evidence you publish, and we are to point to, ESTABLISHES.
Dear Mr Jack
Further to the representations made to you 'by public servants', in
respect of the activities that I have been subjected to by 'state employees and
representatives', I beg to draw your attention to Sections 134 and 135 of the Criminal
Justice Act 1988. I am obliged to raise the issue that I am no member of the Stephen
Lawrence family and that like them I AM A HUMAN BEING WITH FEELINGS, EMOTIONS & RIGHTS
ASSURED IN LAW. The aforementioned extracts and Statutory Provisions can be accessed at
human-rights with 'a link to the law' in the pages that I have now published on the
Internet, as a member of the human-rights.org Community on Line. I feel duty bound to
point to 'the very intentions of Parliament, and to successive governments, bearing in
mind the fact that the sections have not been repealed'.
I understand that you are to receive additional submissions from Mr A
Yiannides, the founder and creator of the human-rights.org Community on Line, in view of
the fact that he has not benefited from an address proper in respect of the issues he
pointed to in his communication, of 8th July 2004, to you..
The most disturbing issue that I first got to know of, after joining
the h-r Community on Line, was/is that 'the judiciary, in our country, having granted
themselves arbitrary powers, they apparently 'have "inherent jurisdiction to stay
proceedings, that MUST FAIL", especially claims against the state'. In so far as I am
aware none is above the law and each case rests and is founded on the FACTS PROVEN, with
the judges 'simply applying the relevant law', for which 'service, to the citizens, they
are retained AS PUBLIC SERVANTS', and not as absolute dictators.
I beg to refer you to reported cases, whereby INSIDERS, benefited and
benefit from awards for trivial issues; one of the many cases is pointed to by and at
human-rights. In another (to be released by human-rights) a police officer 'allegedly not
fit to carry on with his duties, was rewarded with some £50,000.00 only to carry on
'providing services to the police in the town he served for years, but AS AN INDEPENDENT
BUSINESS' after the 'reward'. Of such realities, evidently, the arrangements in place for
'the distribution of taxes that are imposed on the citizens, by the controllers of an
Having pointed you to the fundamental issues upon which any Member of
Parliament should be concerned with, I would like to point you to the INESCAPABLE FACTS
& REALITIES which the evidence I have now published, in the Public Domain and released
at my personal web-site as a member of the Community on Line, establishes:
1. The certificates establishing the SIMPLE FACT & REALISATION that
I was prosecuted without due cause and or any sound evidence in respect of the allegations
the police charged me: Access:
2. Attached to the above issues the element
and inescapable facts that officers and staff of the Crown Prosecution Service were
playing the field. In the process THOUSANDS OF POUNDS BEING SQUANDERED in respect of legal
costs - rewards to the participating 'legal gurus', in scenarios that smack of the
activities in the Judith Ward case. Access:
(your father's statement about the solicitor AND THE MILEAGE, the loads-a-money to be made
out of the Legal Aid Certificate)
Link to ANY OTHER case you point to from the press, in the material you published OR CAN
3. Needless to say, the practices and activities are 'endorsed by one
and all'. Such could not possibly have been ongoing without the blessings of the media,
who occasionally 'stumble on the realisations (as the police and the courts, do) that
'citizens, like Miss Judith Ward, were/are wronged - albeit in her case WITH INTENT by
'the prosecuting legal boffins, out to secure A SUCCESSFUL PROSECUTION in order to bolster
police records in respect of criminal activities by terrorists'. Access:
(your letter to 'The Guardian')
(invisible services by the media to the criminals in control in pseudo-democracies)
Link to ANY page you published in respect of your case that WAS IN THE PAPERS.
4. The SUBMISSIONS TO THE COURT in April 2004, were very clear and
factual. Contempt to MY RIGHTS, as assured (allegedly) IN LAW also very clear. However, it
would appear that precedent over FACTS ESTABLISHED WITHOUT A DOUBT & LAW APPLICABLE
are of no concern to 'alleged' public servants, who granted themselves 'INHERENT
JURISDICTION TO ACT IN CONTEMPT OF FACTS & LAW, which they impose as absolute
dictators with or because of the apparent lack of comprehension of legal matters by the
Deputies of the citizens in Parliament'. Access:
Links to ALL OTHER letters / evidence covering THE OBSTRUCTIONS to your rights to
UNHINDERED & NOT OBSTRUCTED RIGHTS TO JUSTICE
DITTO …..THE MORE THE BETTER, Simon
5. I would like to re-iterate, and I emphasise, THE SIMPLE FACT that the Rt. Hon. David
Blunkett DID ADDRESS correctly the issues that arose out of the letter that was received
by the Rt. Hon. Frank Field last year. I beg also to point to the fact that the officer of
the European Court of Human Rights, abandoned the assertions about destroying the evidence
submitted to the court and complied with the law applicable under the circumstances. IF
factual the proposals by the staff at the ECoHR, needless to say, the 'propositions
were/are nothing else but the usual that indicate the cash under the table
arrangement/practice, hence no need for further action / steps. Access:
6 I am re-working the final draft of MY
LETTER to your Member of Parliament because of the present assertions and
misrepresentations by Lord Filkin's office in the reply that was sent because of your
'relentless submissions. You simply granted them all the right to cast aside ALL
CONSTITUTIONAL ISSUES that I raised and apply in ANY GENUINE democratic state.
Andrew Yiannides NDD., ACFI., ATI., FNAAAS
Founder - *human-rights.org*
London - UK
MATERIAL ADDED at:
The NEW page announced last BUT NOT LINKED TO from other pages, yet.
From there you can also access the original
page we published in 2002,
When we reported to the Home
Secretary/Office, the Treasury and the Prime Minister's private office our objections to
the arrogant abuse of the courts' facilities for rampant constructive frauds.
NEW PAGE, not linked to from other pages,
The page was prepared last year following
the last evil attempt by Norman Scarth AFTER HE TRIED for the third time to abuse Andrew's
work as he and his chums sought to impose their evil practices as 'fraudsters club
recruits'. You will find the letter from Mr Norman Scarth to be a good read AND you will
most impressed with what he left behind, locked in the closet with the rest of 'the family
We will be forwarding copy this NEWSLETTER to a person who contacted us
not long ago. We were informed: - A person, who is locked up (as a result of wrongs by the
law enforcement agencies and the legal circles) is being assisted by our informant.
Apparently an inmate provided the person with information ABOUT a 'solicitor' who could
ably challenge it all. Apparently the 'solicitor' was a fraud and helped himself to some
9500 pounds sterling from the family of the prisoner. The 'solicitor' was/is not even
holder of GCSE's, BUT he was working from within a solicitors office - JUST LIKE THE CHAP
who contacted Mr Johan Michael Foenander and set him on the path to THE DOUBLE
CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUDS ENTERPRISES through the courts.
All we can say us that we heard it all before and Andrew can very
categorically state and emphasise that he does not need anybody to tell him where his nose
is BECAUSE HE HAS LIVED WITH IT FOR A LIFETIME. In other words friends WE KNOW OF IT ALL
and in particular of the 'maintenance engineers' who do a great job promoting the powers
that be through the repetitious 'reports about the wrongs that even Jesus Christ spoke of
2000 years ago. WHAT 'THE SONS OF MEN' (clue) for those of you who have not accessed the
new page /convicti.htm from the words CON of a VICTIm. There you should read the words
attached to the Coat of Arms in the left margin/window panel. You should access BOTH Links
from the words.
One takes you to the /protocol.htm page where you should read it all,
NOTE THE IMAGE of Atlas and read the text attached to it. The other link from the Coat of
Arms points / takes you to an extract AND REALISATIONS / REVELATIONS out of the words
copied from the Old Testament.
Be prepared for surprises that might cause you to recognise WHY in our
pages the words from Andrew, "A population starved of real education and sold to the
page 3 mammary glands and bums, the gee-gees and 22 crazies running around kicking a
leather ball. And in the meantime public servants (judicial char occupants) acting as
absolute dictators as the words we have now released by publishing them at the top of a
number of our pages PROVE = from their bibles.
We maintain, that so long as victims themselves ignore the rights of
the citizens TO CHALLENGE BY EXPOSING THE ABDUCTORS & RAPISTS OF JUSTICE, cross over
in order to join in the rampant fraud through the courts (as alleged legal gurus) AND keep
it all in the family closet (the family of fraudsters they joined and join) THEY ARE
PRIMARILY RESPONSIBLE FOR THE STATE OF AFFAIRS.
When GREED for greens and ego-trips are the priorities of persons who
recognised and or lived through / experienced the criminal activities in the courts such
persons have no right to run around professing trivia WHEN THEY SUPPRESS THE REALITIES
FROM THE PUBLIC DOMAIN (just like the press they complain about) especially when they
indulge in undisclosed conspiracies INTENDED TO DAMAGE OR HARM THE GENUINE CHALLENGERS,
who expose it all as the draft letter covers and our pages evince.
No thank you Mr Scarth, Andrew could not even allow himself to think
about teaming up with TRAITORS / RAPISTS OF JUSTICE.
Founder *humans-rights* NGO)
London – UK
24 November 2004
|From the archives in 2001 - INTERESTING DEVELOPMENTS then and thereafter
An important Newsletter transferred in March 2008 for readers & researchers to
Date: Tue, 22 May 2001 13:21:13 -0600
Subject: human-rights.org Newsletter
Community On Line Newsletter May 2001/1
SOME DEVELOPMENTS? - SOME VIEWS
Newsletter May 2001/1
The *human-rights* Community On Line is now developing as we planned.
Victims of institutionalised Crime are coming forward from within the
United Kingdom, our base. It is anticipated that even victims who were advised by friends
not to publish any material on the Internet will be reviewing their own decisions NOT TO
REPORT CRIMES and to suppress with intent evidence against the criminals who are in
control of our society.
Visitors to the *human-rights* HomePage after visiting the
National Scandal pages do not fail to recognise WHY FORGERIES WERE USED BY THE LOCAL
AUTHORITIES IN ORDER TO STEAL AND MISAPPROPRIATE HOUSING BENEFIT FUNDS. No visitor can
fail to grasp on the fact that the offenders were relying on other public servants - the
police and the Local County Court judges - to ignore breaches of criminal Law.
The latest example of Legal / Judicial / police services
from within the UK we draw attention to by publishing below the entire content of the
submissions made by the victim Mr. William Spring.
Mr. Spring was not familiar with computers and the Internet, in
particular. Within a short space of time he has been able to put together - the results of
his first pages. His tenacity, vigor and the grasp of that which devastated his family and
blighted the future of all from within it, command admiration and much more than simple
understanding. His is the type of case that exposes the sycophants and hypocrites who are
in control of our society, our lives and those of our children and generations to come.
"Is this the society that our Prime Minister wishes to impose in
other lands and counties
‘Has our Prime Minister set aside the promises that New Labour, his
government in waiting, made to our founder in 1995? Have the promises been
relegated to the trash can?"
Take on board the facts of the case that will he stated fully and comprehensibly by the
as he develops and improves his website, we know that the victim will not flinch nor
succumb to pressures from abusers of the corrupted legal and judicial services from within
an allegedly "civilised democracy that, allegedly, is founded and rests on law and
Consider the submissions below, and visit the victim’s web-site. Feel
free to distribute this Newsletter.
London - UK
22 May 2001
Immediate Release - firstname.lastname@example.org
William Spring 83 Black Boy Lane London N15 3AP
Tel : 2088022144 ( + fax)
UK GOVERNMENT JACK STRAW & METROPOLITAN POLICE C)MMISSIONER ACCUSED
OF BEING ANTI-FAMILY SOFT ON CRIME & THE CAUSES OF CRIME, ONLY AS LONG AS THE CRIMES
ARE COMMITTED BY LAWYERS.
- CALL FOR AN INDEPENDENT COMPLAINTS SYSTEM -
William Spring of the Community On Line the human-rights org comments:
"This morning 18th May I heard Jack Straw on the radio talking
about crime. What he said has no relevance. In my area Tottenham I am not bothered about
street crime. What has devastated our family are crimes committed by lawyers, crimes
endorsed & concealed by the Police, judiciary, Lord Irvine & The Law Society. Anti
crime measures should not be class based. As the lawyers can’t clean up their act up,
let someone else do it for them. The Blair Government soft peddles on crime & has
broken the promises made before the last election about combating this particular category
of crime simply because Blair & Cheri are themselves lawyers. I paste below a letter
sent yesterday to Law Society President Michael Napier."
In the letter William Spring calls for his complaint against Law
Beachroft Wansbrouohs (BW) to be considered by an independent panel not
connected to The Law Society. He slates the Government for "protecting judicial
monsters who persecute families, who steal their assets, & who don’t give a dam
about real people being set upon by real thugs, i.e. your Law Society members."
"Ac independent Complaints bureau v Lawyers was promised to us
before the last election by the New Labour Government, as it also promised to eliminate
fraud & waste from the legal system."
Noting "it hasn’t delivered," William Spring says:
"while we are waiting to see what happens re their next lot of promises, I ask that
this particular complaint, as it involves your own solicitors, be considered by an
independent panel not directly connected to the OSS. This is in accord Article Six of the
His original complain re BW was that the firm is seeking to
obstruct justice "by implementinq a costs award only when they were tipped off by The
Metropolitan Police that I had decided to commence a private prosecution against the firm
Williamson & Soden" (W&S).
He has told the Law Society President & the OSS that he has further
complaints "specifically that SW chose to represent fraudsmen, & made no
endeavour when they were given instructions by The Law Society insurance division to
represent fraudsmen, to find out whether any of my allegations were true or not.’
William Sprinp acknowledges the difficulties of lodging such a
complaint re BW: " if I have a legitimate criticism that BW were choosing to
represent fraudsmen, & made no endeavour to find out whether my allegations had any
substance, then as they took their instructions from the SIF, it would appear that the Law
Society itself chose to represent fraudsmen."
He says he gets round that objection by conceding "although it is
true that the Law Society does have a distinct policy of representing fraudsmen &
solicitors against whom criminal charges can be made, this in itself does not extenuate
BW, as they had their own liability to investigate my charqes.
William Spring says "how it is that The Law Society acquired this
mandate, which it rejoices in, to represent fraudsmen & criminals, is one or the
greater mysteries of our civilisation."
He points out that when he first made a complaint to the OSS he was
told " it could be investigated as it raised issues of law & of conduct.
" So I went to Court, as I
was encouraged to do by the OSS.
"Then when I got into the Court up popped BW, with instructions
from the SIF!
"When I queried the propriety of the SIF policy a Mr. Salt of the
SIF wrote to me & said he had done an investigation & was convinced W&S were
William Spring says: " what sort of investigation was that? Mr.
Salt did not sit with a tribunal, nor did he listen to my representations.
The Law Society is willing to do " anything in its power to stop
the truth coming out," & adds notwithstanding the costs demand "nothing will
stop me lodging these Informations."
The Law Society & BW by implementing the costs award, preoccupying
me with these matters can thus attempt to delay the summonses, in the hope that they will
be inadequately prepared, or lack sufficient evidence.
Such a stratagem in effect constitutes an attempt by BW (& The Law
Society) to obstruct & deny justice, which is why I want BW investigated, as the
integrity of this prosecution should be retained, whatever the status of the prosecutor.
Most of these summonses with supporting evidence would have been prepared weeks ago were
it not for BW.
William Spring tells the President that he is "outrage by the
behaviour of The Law Society" more concerned with its costs than with the protection
of the public from criminals.
"Equally Lord Williams of Mostyn (the Attorney General seems more
concerned with cosyinq up to the judges than protecting families from their depredations.
Spring asks: "what do you expect us to do? These people have
walked off with everything my father ever worked for. Do you think this was an
William Spring states he is preparing a private prosecution versus 2
partners of W&S in relation to (inter alia) contempt of Court & of the law, false
accounting, non disclosure/falsification & suppression of accounts & documents,
false statements, theft, obtaining pecuniary advantage by deception, obtaining property by
deception, embezzlement, forgery, fraud, conspiracy to defraud, blackmail, obtaining
services by deception, evading liability to make a payment, criminal negligence,
extortion, conversion of assets, appropriation of assets, perjury + "
various other contraventions of the criminal law in respect to
trusteeship & law pf property & the production of false instruments."
He criticises the Police, (His web site
http://crookjudges,human-rights.org attacks Metropolitan Police
Commissioner John Stevens QPM for refusing to order an investigation into his charges v
W&S. "What a waster! 'This man's constantly on trips - ( soft on crime & the
causes of crime!' - only as long as it is committed by his mates!)
He tells Michael Napier the lack of Police investigation means that he
is disadvantaged "….(in that) there are some charges I would like to prefer
relating to the theft of the entire contents of the family home, which I cannot pursue in
the absence of a (Police) investigation."
He says the judges who have covered matters up & prevented him from
bringing a civil suit of fraud - W&S have a "group solidarity & indifference
to ethics" (which) "rivals that of the KGN", but believes such crook judges
will be "thoroughly & comprehensively discredited at the end of the day".
On re-reading the letter he withdraws his comparison with the KGB, as a
slur on a fine organisation. "The Soviet KGB had high standards of patriotism &
moral purpose. UK judges have no such code of ethics ; they are nihillists aiming to
destroy society. A better comparison would have been with the Gestapo. I have yet to
encounter an honest judge. Well…. I did meet once, but that was in Zimbabwe, & there
was a District judge I met here who seemed honest, which is why he remained a District
He closes his letter to Michael Napier by saying his eventual
vindication will not bring back his wife (killed by the stress of the case) " nor
will it give my children a new start in life, having been brought up in poverty, to the
general gratification of Lord Williams of Mostyn, & this Labour Government, who choose
to protect the rich & powerful & judicial monsters who persecute families, &
steal their assets, and who don't give a dam about real people being set up by real thugs,
i.e. your members."
Copy of letter follows:
To the Law Society
President Michael Napier
William Spring 83 Black Boy Lane London N15 3AP
Dear Mr Napier
I have made a
complaint to the Office for the Supervision of Solicitors (OSS) which "is an
establishment of The Law Society".
My complaint is against a firm of solicitors in Birminqham called
Beachcroft Wansbrouqhs (BW). I made the complaint on May 11th 2001 & sent the
complaint by fax.
To that original complaint (that Beachcrofc Wansbroughs are seekinq to
obstruct justice, by implementing a costs award only when they were tipped off by The
Metropolitan Police that I had decided to commence a private prosecution against the firm
Williamson & Soden W&S) I have now further
complaints to add; specifically that Beachcroft Wansbroughs chose to represent fraudsmen
& made no endeavour when they were given instructions by The Law Society insurance
division to represent these fraudsmen, to find out whether any of my allegations were true
There are however two problems about my complaint:
If I have a legitimate criticism that BW were choosing to represent
fraudsmen, & made no endeavour to find out whether my allegations had any substance,
then - as they took their instructions from the SIF, it would appear that the Law Society
itself chose to represent fraudsmen.
I get round that objection by saying that, although it is true that the
Law Society does have a distinct policy of representing fraudsmen & solicitors against
whom criminal charges can be made, this in itself does not extenuate BW, as they had their
own liability to investigate my charges.
How it is that The Law Society acquired this mandate, which it rejoices
in, to represent fraudsmen & criminals, is one of the greater mysteries of our
When I first made a complaint to the OSS I was told that it could not
be investigated as it raised issues of law & not of conduct.
So I went to Court, as I was encouraged to do by the OSS.
Then when I got into the Court up popped BW, with instructions from the
When I queried the
propriety of the SIF policy a Mr. Salt of the SIF wrote to me & said he had done an
investigation & was convinced Williamson & Soden were not fraudsmen.
What sort of investigation was that?
The OSS says it will not investigate fraud, & then the insurance
division does investigate it, or at least says it does.
But in making this decision to indemnify them & to acquit them of
fraud Mr. Salt did not sit with a tribunal, nor did he listen to ray representations.
Anyway the point is, What sort of investigation was that?
A second problem
re my complaint to the OSS is this: I want an investigation of
solicitors, but the body I am asking to do the investigation is the body which gave these
solicitors their instructions!
Is this not absurd?
I demand an independent complaints body.
This was promised to us before the last election by the New Labour
Government, and it also promised to eliminate fraud & waste from the legal system. But
it hasn’t delivered.
While we are waiting to see what happens regarding
their next lot of promises, I ask that this particular complaint, as it involves your own
solicitors, be considered by an independent panel not directly connected to the 0SS.
This is in accord with Article Six of the Convention.
I also ask that I be allowed to get on with working out my summonses.
Replying to your costs demand is quite a procedure, & has
necessarily distracted me from pursuing with the same concentration as before the
summonses I am preparing against two partners of Williamson & Soden & which relate
(inter alia) to contempt of Court & of the law, false accounting, non
disclosure/falsification & suppression of accounts & documents, false statements,
theft, obtaining pecuniary advantage by deception, obtaining property by deception,
embezzlement, forgery, fraud, conspiracy to defraud, blackmail, obtaining services by
deception, evading liability to make a payment, criminal negligence, extortion, conversion
of assets, appropriation of assets, perjury + various other contraventions of the criminal
law in respect to trusteeship & the law of property & the production of false
too that I am disadvantaged in that the Police have flatly refused to begin an
investigation, & there are some charges I would like to prefer relating to the theft
of the entire contents of the family home, for example which I cannot pursue in the
absence of such an investigation.
Most of these summonses with supporting evidence would have been
prepared weeks ago were it not for BW.
I am outraged by the behaviour of The Law Society. You’ re more
concerned with your costs then with the protection of the public from criminals. Equally
Lord Williams seems more concerned with cosying up to the judges than protecting families
from their depredations.
Nothing will stop me lodging of these Informations. You can of course
attack me through bankruptcy, and endeavour in this way by implication to discredit the
charges I am bringing to Court.
Such a stratagem in effect constitutes an attempt by BW & The Law
Society to obstruct & deny justice, which is why I want BW investigated, as the
integrity of this prosecution should be retained, whatever the status of the prosecutor.
I emphasise I always sought an amicable settlement. It is the obtuse
behaviour of the judges, who act as godfathers in a criminal conspiracy, which has caused
you not to take my allegations seriously.
But what do you expect us to do? These people have walked off with
everything my father ever worked for. Do you think this was an accident?
It seems to me that The Law Society will do anything in its power to
stop the truth coming out but I can assure you that the argument has only just begun.
Whatever happens I will not be deflected from my aim, & demand that
my charges be considered by a jury.
That Judge Buckley & LJ Buxton have frustrated me in this objective
is regrettable, & has delayed things, but both judges, together with others on the
bench, whose group solidarity & indifference to ethics rivals that of the KGB, will be
thoroughly & comprehensively discredited at the end of the day.
Such a vindication of course will not bring back my wife, (who W&S
killed), nor will it give try children a new start in life, having been brought up in
poverty, to the general gratification of Lord Williams of Mostyn, & this Labour
Government, who choose to protect the rich &
powerful & judicial monsters who
persecute families & who steal their assets, & who don't give a dam about real
people being set upon by real thugs, i.e. your members.
I am copyinq this letter to the OSS.
Community on Line web-site
protecting and promoting
Human Rights World Wide
" Do with, by and for yourself that which pleases you,
as long as that which you do does not infringe upon
or violate the rights of any other."
Evidently no one has ever bothered to consider the relevant
factors that apply to such scenarios. No one has ever taken on board the simple fact that
a solicitor, no more no less, acts as an agent for the client. There arise also the added
elements of (a) a solicitor (as the professional in the relationship and contracted
retainer) is responsible for all work executed and accountable to the principal, the
client. (b) A solicitor is responsible for the brief and instructions passed on to a
barrister. (c) A solicitor is responsible for the actions and defaults of an agent who
acts for the solicitor in court proceedings. NO ONE HAS EVER RAISED THE ISSUE OF
'Fraudulently acting / indulging agents'. Visitors are urged to access the blunt
forgery that a solicitor promoted to Andrew, the founder of *human-rights* over three
decades ago (*Link). That professional who was / is
licensed to practice law, by the criminals who issue practice certificates to solicitors
in England & Wales, asserted to the founder of *human-rights* that in view of such
evidence, his client's (Andrew's) case stood no chance at court. That fraud of a
professional simply recommended to Andrew to abandon a case of commercial fraud.
Thereafter no one, including the police, from the lowest to the highest ranks up to the
Commissioner for the Metropolitan Police, Members of Parliament or Minister concerned
themselves with the issue of a forgery created. promoted and used for the corruption
and perversion of Justice. Visitors to this page and ALL OF THE CHARLATANS, STOOGES
& FRAUDSTERS CLUB RECRUITS (named above) also others who are not included but
nonetheless indulged in cat and mouse games are invited to access the blunt forgery that
the legal circles used for arrogant Corruption of Justice. Those who acted, as instructed,
and or as retained agents of the abductors and rapists of Justice (or their under cover
agents, such as leaders of organised victims groups) and persons who were used as
ego-tripping dreamers, those who were/are planning with others (such as the LIPS
crowd/mob) to go about 'offering alleged legal services to targeted victims', persons who
are acting as the Hussein and Malcolm Glynn chaps whom all LIPS (Litigants In Person
Society) members knew of and associated with over the last 10-12 years, are urged to
access the forgery and then to access and consider the rights of the victims of crime, THE
RIGHTS OF THE CITIZENS WHO ARE ENTITLED TO THE PROTECTION OF THE LAW in accordance with
the principles published in the exclusive page all can *Link
2. Visitors can link to a case of free-for-all and repetitious
attempts at denials of rights to a targeted victim. Abuse of the courts facilities with
'blunt and arrogant racial discrimination'. Blatant defaults by police officers (all
levels and ranks) who, like the county court staff and officers, also indulge in
fraudulent misrepresentations and misconduct in public office. Everyone acting so, in
order to achieve pre-determined goals for the targeted : to impose their terms and to
create conditions that serve their plans for their victims. Police Officers, County Court
staff and officers, Magistrates Court administrators and officers. Also the Lord
Chancellor's Office and Department. ALL acting in concert, the cog-wheels of CIUKU Enterprises. Visitors can read HOW each vile attempt was
challenged by the targeted victim who, nonetheless had to endure the invasion on and
abduction of his life and the denial of rights to a life as planned by the targeted
victim, for himself and his family. Access and read of the imposed 'forced labour' : the
work necessitated to challenge the activities of THE CRIMINALS WHO HAVE BEEN IN CONTROL,
for centuries, in pseudo-democracies; the false states which the media barons misrepresent
as the genuine article to the naive and gullible. (*Link to the
full story - briefly stated with more than enough to raise awareness and concerns for
anyone who desires true and factual reporting about 'life in the mother of modern
should access the exclusive page where 'the facility in place' for the double fraud, on the tax-payers, is exposed. Alleged
'victims', persons who run around ranting about their suffering, going for the carrot
(facility) in place and THEN WORKING FOR AND FROM WITHIN THE SYSTEM as alleged legal
experts with one goal in mind. To use victims they are pointed to FOR THE SAME ACTIVITIES
& THE DOUBLE FRAUD THROUGH ABUSE OF THE COURTS' PROCESSES. Simply the best of
fraudulent conversions arrangements that CIUKU Enterprises managers contrived. (*Link to the best kept 'open secret' founded and resting on
facts (the practices) and the alleged legal avenue for fraud on the tax-payers, 'care of
the fraudsters club recruits'; persons who go for the carrot, not as blackmailed victims,
but, as 'sold to the devil souls'). XXX
4. Mr Paul Talbot-Jenkins, received proof, as some of
his like-minded soul-mates; others who are similarly suffering from a psychosis and are
simply promoting their opinions (without any evidence or proof) about the Free Masons....
the Free Masons. The proof was documented and it pointed to the root of all evil, as
imposed on mankind for millennia. He treated it all in the same manner as he and his chums
acted (shoved their heads in the sand) ON MANY INSTANCES EARLIER (and ever since). NOT ONE
OF THEM EVER EXPRESSED ANY VIEWS OR OPINIONS ABOUT THE ARRANGEMENTS (in place) FOR THE
DOUBLE FRAUD ON 'the serfs', 'the shitizens', THE TAXPAYERS. We confess that we were not
expecting anything else from accomplished lovers of the confidential fraud arrangements in
place. HE SHOVED HIS HEAD IN THE SAND ALONG WITH THOSE OTHERS who acted similarly ON THE
ISSUE OF THE DOUBLE FRAUD (*Link to the exclusive exposures)
and as far as we are aware it is still buried deep in the sand. In so far as we are aware
they are all KEEPING THEIR HEADS BURIED DEEP IN THE SAND, for reasons that any idiot can
understand. The Evidence they received will be released in due course; we are still
collating evidence on the all important element / issues of "WHO & WHAT (persons
and elements) ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PERPETUATION OF THE STATE OF AFFAIRS, irrespective
of the words of many a dignitary? (*Link).