Changes18 May 2005
JOIN the Community On Line and work with others for and in the necessary challenges
and exposures for the common good. Link to Information Page
The visitor's attention is drawn to the words
of Jesus Christ, attributed to Him by the editors / creators of The Gospel according to
St. Luke. Access His words to the lawyers some 2000 years ago. Many the dignitaries over
the two millennia who shared His views (*Link).
|Misconduct in Public Office *Page created April 1998*
||Page Revised: June 20, 2012. Introduction
to page NOW points to Fundamental DUTIES of the Home Secretary as policing Supremo
under reconstruction - ongoing additions and improvements in material and links From and
to other pages / web-sites
VISITORS ARE URGED to access and READ THE IMPORTANT
update and ADDENDA we were obliged to introduce in January 2002.
We had no choice but to REPORT THE CRIMES TO THE TREASURY.
Our observations and knowledge of the constructive frauds made us accessories if we kept
quiet, like the alleged victims who work towards the implementation of the schemes by the
abductors and rapists of Justice, the Goddess. You will find the addenda statement at
the top of the Updated Pages File. We are sure that you will share with us our concerns
and most profound disappointment at and with persons who adopt and promote activities
which they know are nothing but downright crimes. We refer to
our exclusive page where we expose (as conscientious law abiding citizens) the Confidentiality Between Fraudsters that
exists care of the BEST OPEN SECRET.
Guidelines on Navigating through the
extensive material: access instructions.
As part of the reconstruction process our
new pages and pages where changes and additions have been implemented, the improved /
amended pages are endorsed with the link 'Page Changes and the date of the last changes.
The link takes visitors to a List of the changes implemented in the page. These include
new material and links from relevant paragraphs to other or new relevant material in
other pages. For further clarification email: webmaster@
Court of Appeal
The Common Law Offence of 'Misconduct in Public Office'
access the sections of the Criminal Justice Act 1988 after reading the facts and rights
covered in this page. Parts of the CJA1988 specifically cover the indictable offences that
ARE REGARDED AS COMMITTED 'through an act or an omission'. Readers, researchers, victims
on acquainting themselves with the brief elements of the cases stated below can use this [*Link] for direct connection to the specific provisions.
appellant...... was on duty...... took no steps to..... HE WAS CHARGED in an indictment
with misconduct whilst acting as an officer of justice in that he deliberately failed to
carry out his duty...... by wilfully omitting to take any steps to........ bring to
justice....... At the trial he objected to the indictment on the grounds that it did not
disclose an offence known to the law. The trial judge ruled against the objection and the
trial proceeded. The jury returned a verdict of guilty and the appellant was convicted. He
appealed against the conviction on the ground that the trial judge erred in ruling that
the indictment disclosed an offence known to law. The appellant conceded that at common
law there existed an offence of misconduct in public office, but contended that mere
nonfeasance by a person in the discharge of his duty as the holder of a public office was
insufficient to constitute the offence and there had to be a malfeasance or, at least, a
misfeasance involving corruption or fraud."
Court of Appeal HELD:
public officer who wilfully and without reasonable excuse or justification neglected to
perform any duty he was bound to perform by common law or statute was indictable for the
common law offence of misconduct in public office. The
element of culpability required was not restricted to corruption or dishonesty, although
it had to be such that the conduct impugned was calculated to injure the public
interest and called for punishment. Whether there was
such conduct was a matter for the jury on the evidence. Since the indictment alleged
deliberate and wilful neglect by the appellant to perform his duty...... it disclosed
an offence of misconduct in public office. It followed that the judge's ruling had
been correct and that the appeal would be dismissed".
The above scenario should be close to the
hearts of many a victim of the legal circles, judicial chair occupants, the police also
irresponsible Members of Parliament and Ministers. All should look to themselves however,
as a first port of call and all should ask themselves: "What steps did
I ever take in order to ensure that the citizens of these lands, the taxpayers, are
made aware of the false states sold to the citizens by alleged servants of the public?"
We need only point to the material in our pages where we cover the realities
pointing to the fact that the citizens are systematically fed with misinformation by the
Intellectual Prostitutes who are retained and maintained by the media barons simply to act
so. We hasten to add also, that the media relentlessly promote all manner of irrelevant,
to the well being of society, activities and issues; worse, however are the ever-present
detractions to created and misrepresented pseudo-concerns and data that in no way
represent realities and the truth of the matter DUE TO THE FACT that all elements of
essence to the data ARE IGNORED & SUPPRESSED. [*Link from here to list of sold to
the system as is defaulters who failed and fail, with intent, to act in any manner that
could put on record, in the public domain their alleged complaints. They act so, simply
because they were/are after the spoils created through the abused court facilities, the
organised fraud and corruption we expose in the exclusive page linked-to from here]
The ruling we point to, below, is very clear. It makes
more than just common sense, when one reads it in conjunction with the obvious, which the
case stated above covers.
deceit was practised by an intentional wrongdoer he was liable for the actual damage which
directly flowed from the fraudulent inducement without reference to the transaction date
or any other date, and foresee-ability of such damage was irrelevant".
In a nutshell the wrongdoer who indulges in deceit /
dishonesty / crime meets the costs of the original and all accrued damages whether or not
the wrongdoer could foresee that damages would flow from the original wrongdoing. Consider
the Court of Appeal ruling above and bear in mind the following factors:
- The assertion and reliance, by an officer of law, that only if there
had been evidence of any involvement or engagement in fraud or corrupt practices (for that
matter) could there have been grounds leading to the indictment and the prosecution that
secured a conviction under common law. Their Lordships, at the time, did not need to refer
to any Act of Parliament to determine that an officer of law did act wrongly and in
contempt of his duties to serve the law and the citizens.
- The ruling, above, makes it abundantly clear that, when a
person indulges in any act leading to pecuniary advantage and thefts of properties
(including rights in law, do note) as covered by Acts of Parliament to which we point in our pages [*Link from here to an element
covered by law, no one relates to] the person is
liable for the original damages and the accrued consequential losses and damages.
- In the first case the offender merely negated in his duties to
protect a member of the public from the consequences of criminal acts. In the second case
what we have is an offender who indulged in wrongdoing for pecuniary advantage - for which
you must refer to the page you can link to from the above paragraph.
- Consider, now all of the above issues and the most relevant issue of
all. Citizens, pardon, the 'serfs', are constantly bombarded with : "Ignorance of the law is no defence". The officer of the law in the first case, above, could not even
have been considered as an ignorant of the law 'serf'. However, how about the criminals
who indulged in the procurement and the promotion of a false instrument, which they also
made even falser by forging the date after they discovered that they had goofed? [*Link to the page where we relate
briefly the criminal activities by the legal circles INCLUDING JUDICIAL CHAIR OCCUPANTS
ALL THE WAY TO THE COURT OF APPEAL].
- EVEN BETTER for the 'serfs' to consider. How could any judicial chair
occupant or police officer, who handled the false and forged instrument, EVER rely on
ignorance of the law, when in fact they get their fat salaries, from our taxes, just to
apply their knowledge of the law to the facts stated by the victims of crime and covered
also in the theatres which they dare to promote as alleged courts of justice?
- Look up the word 'jockey' in any decent etymological dictionary. No
one can possibly fail to recognise the implications that arise out of the crass arrogance
of police officers and judicial chair occupants. They indulge in the most vile of crimes,
because of and through their contempt of the law which they are retained to serve, as
- Can anyone not agree with us that what we are faced with are nothing
but Rampant Corruption Jockeys?
(*F1 a most
important element below)
Over to you, your Lordship, and to your dedicated
team who allegedly is looking into complaints about judicial conduct. The citizens, your
Lordship, look to the Home Office and to the Home Secretary for protection (*Link) and
for the police, under the command of the Home Office, to cease their vile activities, such
as we point to in our pages. We publish evidence that they rely on stooges and
planted mischief makers who promote nothing but inexcusable and unjustified lies (*Link) created
and promoted by the scam in the police forces in every corner of these islands, as in
other parts of the world, that can be accessed in and through our pages.
WE, the pro-active citizens, do not rely on the
stooges and the lap-dogs who serve their masters (*Link) from within the media. We are
using our rights as provided under THE LAW. Your Lordship, neither you nor the persons
that YOU MAINTAIN IN OFFICE, as servants of the law and justice, and as alleged judicious
persons, can go on ignoring the victims of the rampant fraud, at and through the courts.
We shall not be silenced.
We look to the elected, our representatives in
government, to ensure that all bad apples are made to account, personally THROUGH YOUR
OFFICE and the department that meets their fat salaries, for the wrongs they imposed on
the 'serfs' whom they targeted and target in collaboration with the legal circles.
We look to the present government and its leader,
also all others who are legally qualified, to ensure that the undertaking, in 1995, to
deal with the FRAUD IN THE LEGAL SYSTEM, is dealt with appropriately by the House of
Commons, the elected representatives of the 'citizens'. The citizens object to being
treated as 'serfs' of the Middle Ages. The days of 'you create and we take', supposedly,
were laid by the wayside when democracy was introduced to these islands.
We look to their Lordships including the Law Lords
to come to terms with the fact that true Democracy is from the roots up and not from the
leaves down (*Link). The other way round implies and amounts to dictatorship by abusers of the
power of office, any office. Public servants should be seen to be serving the citizens in
accordance with the remit of their retainers and ALWAYS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LAW.
Our founder wonders, if by any
chance the French jurist Charles Louis Montesquieu was referring
to these islands and the arrangements by the predecessors of the managers / organisers /
planners of the lives of 'the subjects' when he coined:
"When I go to a country, I do not
look to see whether there are good laws, but whether those there are enforced, for good
laws are everywhere".
In October 2010, the coalition's Attorney General, in an interview
published by 'COUNSEL' specifically spoke of the police distancing themselves
from cases of (small-fry) fraud and asserted that he was
making that element his department's priority. IT REMAINS TO BE SEEN, WHAT the
coalition of the Con-LibDems, THE GOVERNMENT OF THE DAY WILL IN FACT ATTEND TO THE RAMPANT
FRAUD, and IF IT WILL DEAL with the criminals who abuse public office, especially
when faced with appropriate submissions and claims that will be delivered in due course.
Visitors/readers are urged to read the article published in the London Evening Standard,
as settled by the Rt. Hon. David Blunkett, Home Secretary in 2003 [*Link from here
to the article we reproduce in another webpage and consider "Why tolerate the
arrogance of the legal circles who had and have the audacity to assert to the lawmakers
that the y, the lawmakers have nothing to do with the law"].
While there, above it, the explicit letter to
ex-Minister, the Rt. Hon. Frank Field MP, delivered a few days earlier. ALL alleged
victim-challengers who contacted Andrew Yiannides, by the time the letter was sent to the
Minister, received copy of the letter just as they received copies of other letters
submitted to government maintained Ministers and other official appointees to public
office. Accessing the material pointed to from the letter (URLs) is of utmost importance.
It should assist 'recognition of the citizen's rights at work', when called upon properly
in truly democratic states. The above in 2003; there were other 'submissions' and among
such civilised and, within the law, approaches by citizens that led to the right actions
by governments, the explicit challenges when we set about exposing one of the most evil of
alleged victims of the legal circles to have ever contacted us [*Link to our explicit submissions to (a) the Prime
Minister, (b) the Chancellor / Treasury, (c) the Home Secretary. WE acted so after we had
secured more than enough evidence about the parts of an alleged victim whose only
interests were (i) the rewards under the table FOR KEEPING QUIET about the ORGANISED FRAUD
THROUGH ABUSE OF THE COURTS' FACILITIES and (ii) her parts in blunt attempts that were
intended to discredit the person she was sent along to mess about with, Mr Andrew
Yiannides]. Access please the
letter to the Home Secretary, the Rt. Hon. Jack Straw, in December 1998 [*Link*
[*L] from here to the letter] and note the results
evinced in the newspaper article (Hornsey Journal) also within days of the letter reaching
its destination. Many the charlatans and stooges -lovers and 'promoters of the system as is'- on the
job for decades; one and all acting as sold souls always do [*Link [*L] from here to the evidence we
point to relative to the parts of one of a number of sold to the system fraudsters who
were sent along / introduced to Andrew Yiannides by the managers / organisers of the LIPS
crowd / mob].