ljl99p1r.jpg (168651 bytes)  ljl99p2r.jpg (264186 bytes) ljl99p3r.jpg (266253 bytes) ljl99p4r.jpg (254437 bytes) ljl99p5r.jpg (218447 bytes)


Page Revised: June 20, 2012.    hrbnrsml.gif (1162 bytes) Click JOIN the Community On Line

Home-Page for The Lord Chancellor

and his office

These pages are dedicated to matters arising out of practices that violate the rights of citizens in the course of court proceedings by the legal professions.  Entertained and or freely aided and abetted by the staff of the courts; also in many an instance by persons who purportedly act in a JUDICIOUS (do note the word your Lordship) capacity and not merely through the much revered, and relied upon, independence of judicial office in pursuit of other goals and or other ulterior motives. Such 'mentalities' were exposed in the Downing Street Years* when their Lordships determined that copyright law existed not and that the threatened infringement of copyright ought to be allowed in order to generate, thereafter, more work for the legal boffins and the circles from within which our judiciary rise to public office, allegedly as independent, unbiased and impartial 'judicial persons' who ought not to ignore the principles of the laws they are meant to uphold and apply in all instances before them.

Consider the advise below to French judges. Cross refer the issues raised through Mr Geoffrey Harold Scriven's affidavit* covering the activities of the Legal/Judicial Cabals that operate freely in the United Kingdom.  Consider the responses citizens get from the Lord Chancellor's department and or office. The rights in law of the citizens ARE violated systematically in UK courtrooms, and fair comment IS called for*, such as we make through our pages in respect of the 'routine - responses' from the Lord Chancellor's department.*

We publish below an article from The Times of 18th April 1996; it covers MORALS

morals95.jpg (184955 bytes) Submissions covering Legal Aid Facilities added to the 'page'.

NOTE the closing three lines above and OUR SUGGESTION (left hand box).  For over FOUR years we have been presenting facts and realities to many in public office. TO THE MEDIA. NO ONE CARED about the facts of life within Local Authorities where the staff had been operating their own Housing Benefit scams and organised frauds on the helpless private landlords. NO ONE CARED. Now we are told the Lord Chancellor is acting  AT   LAST, as in the marquee below qualified.  The police, promised to bring about prosecutions against persons who worked with and WERE USING others for their own distribution schemes for the Housing Benefit Funds. The funds were/are ENTRUSTED TO LOCAL AUTHORITIES by Central Government to meet the costs for the occupation of properties, belonging to private landlords, by claimants. WE await to see how other public servants are to behave now and how they are treated by the participating in and benefiting from the scams, defaulting police authorities.

WE made submissions to the Legal Aid Board and documented evidence, with copies of the FORGERIES USED BY THE CRIMINALS WERE DELIVERED in support of and as proof of the scams operated at a much higher level within the Local Authorities. Other evidence exists.*

newsflash on 19 May 1999 the Lord Chancellor announced steps were being taken against cowboy lawyers who USE refugees and abuse the Legal Aid facilities........

(Back to National Scandal: Publicly funded )

And below another article from The Times of 27th May 1997

pubchojr.gif (41125 bytes)

'Public to help in choosing judges' qualifies the article. 

In the course of the Festival of Rights (1995) our founder submitted that:-  "The public needs a right by law, whereby any citizen can object to the appointment of any person to judicial office by stating the grounds upon which the person should not be appointed. When such a 'safety valve is in place' persons aspiring to judicial office will know that the public is looking over their shoulders and in the course of their legal services career will think twice before acting improperly when representing members of the public".  The submissions were made in the course of the debate 'Can We Trust Our Judges?' and were  repeated in a letter to the Rt. Hon. Paul Boateng who received also the abridged copy of  "The Breeding Grounds - case"* published on our pages. It was also later submitted to the Stephen Lawrence* Inquiry.  The Rt. Hon. Paul Boateng responded in the context of the letter we publish below.

paboackr.jpg (24375 bytes)

We state elsewhere that following proclamations in 1994-1995, by the leader of the opposition, the Rt. Hon. Tony Blair that,  "A future Labour Government would be tackling issues arising out of... " matters we raise in our web pages, our founder submitted material to the Prime Minister in waiting worth considering. The submissions qualified that the public was/is fast waking up to the realities and the free for all the legal circles have been benefiting from for God knows how long. Our founder had in mind the works and words of Charles Dickens; the observer of his times was explicit in "Bleak House" and as to his famous "...The Law Is A Ass..." ('Pickwick Papers') everyone heard of. The material and submissions were referred by the Rt. Hon. Tony Blair to the Rt. Hon. Paul Boateng who, as Labour's  Legal Affairs Spokesperson wrote of  and acknowledged the simple fact of   "Fraud in the Legal System'. In his letter he also assured our founder of sweeping reforms and 'wide ranging measures'.  We have been waiting for genuine reforms and in particular for the essential provisions that would enable citizens to make a case to the Lord Chancellor and the government of the day cases that the police should prosecute because no one from within the legal circles, INCLUDING JUDGES, can rely on lack of knowledge of 'The LAWS of Parliament'. After all they keep reminding the citizens that ignorance of 'The LAW' is no defence and they are presumed to be the experts, the 'licensed authorities'.

WE have been noting developments and observing the tribulations of many a tormented victim of the free for all that individuals from within the legal services and the lower courts 'still indulge in as independent of the Laws of Parliament' as judicial chair appointees determine relentlessly. The 'appointees' are meant to be impartial and free of any other influences and or 'human frailties and weaknesses'. They are the persons entrusted with the 'welfare of the nation' and as upholders and guardians of Parliament's Laws and ALL commitments our representative governments have made to the International Community on our behalf through International Treaties, accords and participation in International bodies such as the United Nations Organisation, etc.

We refer you to 'The LAW' compilation we publish in our pages. We draw your attention, to references to documents that lack material facts and or accountability by the authors. Court Orders lacking reference to the evidence lodged and or filed at Court with affidavits and or as presented to the Court in the course of presumed 'court hearings in open courts, allegedly' and before alleged 'impartial judicial chair occupants' whose orders lack fundamental facts, such as references to LAW applicable and documented evidence presented and lodged at court. Do refer to the Geoffrey Harold Scriven pages and note the wording on one of the two Orders we publish; the words "UPON READING THE EVIDENCE" clearly highlighted. An honourable judge executing his public duties conscientiously and as the occasion COMMANDED.

Consider the statutory provisions in respect of false instruments 'lacking material facts, such as ORDERS WITHOUT ANY REFERENCE TO THE EVIDENCE BEFORE THE COURT.  As a 'simple' member of the Jury at large inform us if Court Orders lacking any reference to the evidence before the Court can be acceptable to you as 'an instruments accounting for the facts and the evidence before the court'. If like us you determine that such instruments are part and parcel of "The Constructive Frauds Industry that evolved within the corrupted legal services for the benefits of "The Self Perpetuating Cancerous Growth Industry" our governments ignore contact your Member of Parliament and the media and make your views known also to us. We need to know that you care and that you wish for Democracy and Justice to be released by their captors; the politicians who ignore the principles of TRUE DEMOCRACY and the legal circles who are of opinion that they are above and outside the scope of 'The Law' applicable to their practices and methods of operations

When you consider that Court Orders that are lacking in material facts (discarding / ignoring evidence) consider also the response from the Rt. Honourable Tony Blair, as Prime Minister now consequential to presentations arising out of the National Scandal; the practices arising out of and founded in the handling of funds secured fir and belonging to others. WE refer to the Housing Benefit funds, conveniently at the disposal of criminals operating out of Local Authorities. In the letter we publish below, dated 29th November 1999, recognition of the fact that we were/are dealing with CRIMES. We responded accordingly because the Prime Minister's directions made it clear he too, recognised the matters we raised were attached to CRIMES, and as the Rt. Hon Prime Minister, as a legally trained person knows: "No one is above 'The LAW' (Link).

pmled99r.jpg (33033 bytes) Matters referred to the Home Office  link to letter of 18th December 1998

(Back to Police: letter from Tony Blair  National Scandal: Letter from Prime Minister

Our submissions to the Home Secretary in December 1998, produced results from the government. Haringey Council received extra funds to cope with the blatant invitations to 'refugees and asylum seekers to the land of milk and honey*. The promoted influx to the land of the  free for all; dishonesty and deception as practised by public servants and within our Law Enforcement Agencies. We expose some of the facts in our Local Authority pages and we publish the evidence, FORGERIES used and relied upon in order to steal and misappropriate Housing Benefit funds. The relevant county court officers were aware of the practices by Council staff and officers; they ignored, statements and evidence attached to other affidavits besides the one we now publish with the attached exhibits. The letter from the Legal Aid Board, exhibit arose out of abuses in the case that we referred to in the Criminal Injuries Compensation Authority pages.

The Chief Superintendent of the police, within Haringey division, and Sir John Stephens QPM will presently be challenged to account for the performance of the officers under their command, and for other public servants  who misconduct in public office. The police seen to be 'ignoring 'The LAW' and the evidence, particularly after other public servants imposed also criminal damages to the properties of targeted citizens. Such activities (and convenient defaults in the performance of their public duties) in the promotion of their choice of society.

We refer to the society founded and resting on dishonesty, deceptions, fraudulent misrepresentations and BLUNT FORGERIES.  Forgeries and false instruments lacking material facts and accountability by the authors. Of such facts and documented evidence the practices 'in the free for all areas we cover in our web-site'. All care of 'the relevant county court services' in the fraudulent distribution arrangements of the Housing Benefit funds belonging to others. And reliance on such services by and from the 'relevant county court' referred to in a letter from a member of staff at Haringey Council who wrote with impunity in March 1996*. 

Following exchanges with the Prime minister and his private office we wrote on 25th January 2000 to the Lord Chancellor and demanded of his 'dedicated team' (which the Lord Chancellor set up in his department) to call in to their office the county court file pertaining to the Housing Benefit Funds, constructive fraud attempts and the indulgences of all participants in the National Scandal within Haringey, in North London. We demanded that the dedicated team lists all documents the architects of 'their kind of services' provide to the unsuspecting; to the public who fall victims to ILL legal services as we quote in the dedication panel at the top of most pages of our web-site.  GREED* and no respect for the rights in law of others. No respect to LIFE, as the targeted victims AE ENTITLED TO without impositions by criminals, let alone public servants who misconduct in public office and operate as 'automatons in states founded on BLUNT DICTATORIAL and feudal practices by self appointed Lords and Masters operating from within alleged democracies.

Right to a life of ones choice recklessly STOLEN and abducted by the dishonest and deceitful who misconduct in public office* in contempt of the evidence and 'The LAW'* thereby forcing the citizens (not serfs) into a life wasted in front of the very offenders who steal/abducted their rights in law and their lives away, just as the very same circles abducted the Goddess Justice in order to rape her daily in their theatres of 'No Recordings - No Cameras' because they need to protect themselves from the facts and the realities of THEIR VILE PRACTICES.  

Link to:  Cowboy Lawyers     the Routine response    h-rHome Page   Evidence exists
Link to:  The CAMILA Project home-page    Downing Street    Scriven Affidavit 
Link to:  Solicitor Admits Fraud    The LAW    The Breeding Grounds - case
Link to:  Stephen Lawrence -challenge    asylum seekers to the land of..
Link to:  Misconduct in Public Office    GREED    Corrupt Britain
Link to:  Member of Haringey Council wrote with impunity
Link to:  The National Scandal - institutionalised fraud and corruption  

Revised: June 20, 2012.

Copyright subsists on all material on our web-site, owned by the authors of same.




The creator of this website was inviting victims to access URrights & join him there with other victims to expose & challenge abusers of trust & public office until the providers of the facilities >ning.com< introduced new terms and conditions for the provision of the facilities. Access from here and read of the imposed states by the brains behind ning.com and consider only one element "WHY OBSTRUCT & HINDER THE DOWNLOAD of the existing material at URrights.ning.com >the intellectual properties of the creator of that presence on the Internet and those who joined him there? Read below of the unacceptable conduct and behaviour by the reckless abusers of trust, who set out to obstruct and blackmail the creator of URrights.ning

Persons who are genuinely concerned and object to the ways they were / are being treated by alleged servants of the publicand the law >in any PSEUDOdemocracy, or whatever states / conditions they are subjected to< by abusers of public facilities and public office >as we cover in our web-pages< should contact webmaster@human-rights.org for information relevant to the creation of similar facilities for INFOrmation on URrights, for facilities for URrights EUrope and for a NETwork of URrights activists.

  • APOLOGIES to friends and persons who could not access URrights following the recent changes by the providers of the facility (ning.com) Andrew Yiannides created and used the portal to create the presence on the Internet for the group of victims / challengers who joined with him to expose and challenge the arrogant and blunt abuse of public services in all allegedly civilised societies > PSEUDODEMOCRACIES <.

  • The changes related to the introduction of charges for the facilities, included the facility for ning.com to archive the material at URrights; also the facility to download the archived material to the creator's system (computer) while the creator and his group of friends considered which of the level of charges and service the group was to adopt.

  • HOWEVER the creator, Andrew Yiannides, WAS UNABLE TO DOWNLOAD THE ARCHIVED MATERIAL and all attempts to engage the providers and their staff in reasonable explanation as to WHY THE FAILURES TO CONNECT / DOWNLOAD from the ning.com servers THE ARCHIVED MATERIAL, were contemptuously ignored.

  • Emails to the Publicity, to the Promotion, to the Public Relations, also to the Chief Executive's Office merited no response whatsoever from anyone acting for ning.com

  • In the circumstances Andrew will appreciate any information related to the problems covered above. Andrew will also appreciate any information relative to exchanges with or email postings, from ning.com to existing members.

  • EXISTING URrights members, victims of the legal system, victims of solicitors and the courts should access the updated pages at .org/solicitors.htm and .org/solfraud.htm by using the links from the list below.

Below pages where we expose known lovers of it all, users and maintenance engineers of the system as is

.org/1999dfax.htm .org/1ofmany.htm .org/2lipstalk.htm .org/4deceit.htm .org/absolute.htm .org/abusers.htm
.org/account4.htm .org/actors.htm .org/actors2.htm .org/adoko.htm .org/bankers.htm .org/beware.htm
.org/blunket1.htm .org/chaldep1.htm .org/confraud.htm .org/contract.htm .org/convicti.htm .org/courts.htm
.org/corruptcourts.htm .org/crimesin.htm .org/dreamers.htm .org/evesused.htm .org/evilones.htm .org/famfraud.htm
.org/govolso.htm .org/guesswhy.htm .org/len.htm .org/mauricek.htm .org/media.htm .org/solfraud.htm
.org/solicitors.htm .org/someplan.htm .org/someploy.htm .org/thefacts.htm .org/theproof.htm .org/thenerve.htm
.org/twisted.htm .org/uaccount.htm .org/ukmm.htm .org/uwatchit.htm .org/watchit1.htm .org/yourtax.htm
  • Every single person we name and expose in the above pages elected to ignore THEIR OBLIGATIONS TO REPORT (to 'the serfs' = 'the taxpayers'), THE ABUSERS OF PUBLIC OFFICE & PUBLIC FACILITIES. All were/are relying on the Intellectual Prostitutes, from within the media, to keep it all in the family closet.
  • All, as typical twin-tongue hypocrites carry on complaining about the media for failing to report & for suppressing the facts and the realities they allegdely reported to the hard of hearing, to the otherwise committed angels blowing their silent trumpets for decades, all ready and gearing to welcome the expansion of the New World Order.
  • Of such parts the contributions from and failings of the persons we name and expose, AS IF THEIR OWN SILENCE, THEIR FAILURES  & THEIR BLUNT OBSTRUCTIONS to the work and other actions by the creator of this website, Andrew Yiannides, treated by one and all as if non-existent with the exception when the wily Norman Scarth, set off to abuse the trust he was allowed to benefit from, while his parts and questionable activities / performance were under scrutiny, specifically after HE FAILED to publish the full transcript of the Court of Appeal hearing HE WAS ALLOWED TO RECORD* [*Link from here to the food for thought page created by Andrew Yiannides, in the first instance].
  • Not one ever bothered to address the issues we expose in the explicit page, despite the fact that we have been pointing all of our contacts, since May 1992, to it all.
  • Visitors, readers and researchers are urged / invited to access and read the letter which the Hon. Secretary of the Litigants In Person Society, Mr. Norman Scarth sent to the founder of human-rights, Mr. Andrew Yiannides, reproduced in the page .org/4deceit.htm* [*L]
  • The author's statements, such as 'what for and why seek additional assistance', thereby spelling out his parts as a lover of it all.
  • Common sense dictates, that he should have directed his request to his partners in deceptions aplenty, one & all engaging in fraudulent misrepresentations AND NOTED TO HAVE, WILFULLY, BEEN SUPPRESSING, FROM THE TAXPAYERS, THE FACTS OF LIFE RELATIVE TO THE RAMPANT ABUSE OF THE COURTS FACILITIES as the failure of all to co-operate as covered and pointed to at:- [*L]. One and all fallen to the facilities for fraud aplenty on the taxpayers and the corruption of illiterates in law, the conditioned victims of the legal circles & courts who fall to the blackmail element attached to the REWARD for keeping the realities away from the taxpayers; just like the media and the Ministers responsible for the application of long existing law to the criminal activities we cover in our pages, do.
  • All the while one and all were / are engaging in the scenarios we cover in the exclusive page, which page the author of the letter which Mr Norman Scarth sent to Andrew Yiannides, afforded us the opportunity to address the issue of the contributions of his partners and affiliates in fraud aplenty on the taxpayers; despite the reminder one and all, named in the new page simply shoved it all in the dark corners of their devoid of grey matter skulls, their perverted / corrupted mind(s)

On Sunday morning, the 19th September 2010, the Deputy Prime Minister, leader of the Liberal-Democrats in the course of the BBC TV politics programme, spoke of the coalition government's commitment to address the element of waste and fraud through the public services sector. We trust and hope that the elements we expose in our pages and the parts adopted by the conditioned victims of the legal circles, the persons who engage in PROMOTING & EXPANDING THE ONGOING CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUD ON THE TAXPAYERS, THROUGH ABUSE OF THE COURTS' FACILITIES, will be on the top of the list of government priorities.
Visitors, readers & researchers are urged to access the letters to Minister Frank Field [*L] after he had been directed by the Prime Minister to think/do the unthinkable.
Link also from here [*L] to the explicit letter to the Home Secretary in December 1998 with submissions arising out of the RAMPANT HOUSING BENEFIT FRAUD
On Tuesday 23rd November 2010, 'the Guardian' in its Comment & Debate page carried an article by Nick Clegg, the Deputy Prime Minister. In the evening of the same day the Deputy Prime Minister addressed a large audience at Kings place in respect of the government's changes on university students fees / loans.
Access from here the page where we reproduce an image of 'the Guardian' article & consider the simple fact that we, alone, have been asserting and proclaiming our objections to the theft of funds from the national budget leading to the ever-increasing annual deficit in the state's balance of payments.

ACCESS:  http://www.justice-uk.human-rights.org/ (For an important message at this Community-on-Line web-site) & thereafter,
Access also http://www.law.society.complaints.and.human-rights.org/ (Judge instigates Fraud On Tax Payers - he knows not the difference between 'imposed' & 'no undue influence'). APOLOGIES FOR THE DISAPPEARANCE OF THIS WEBSITE.It appears that the beneficiary of the work, both for applications to the courts in the United Kingdom and the submissions to the European Court for Human Rights* [*Link from here to the Statement of Facts submitted to the ECoHR], arranged with the providers of the free web space to erase the Intellectual Property of Andrew Yiannides, the founder of the human-rights Community-on-Line, without any reference to the creator of the website and owner of the Intellectual Property!
Ú╝»font> Copyright subsists on all material in our web-site, owned by the authors of same.
Visitors can refer to these pages in any non commercial activity, so long as attribution is given as to source. License to use, for commercial or other specific use of the material, shall have been secured in writing first, from the owners of any property and material from these pages. No material shall be reproduced in any form and by any means without prior agreement and or license in writing from the copyright owners. The Press are invited to contact us if they wish to publish material in the Public Interest, As We Do.
For any problems or questions regarding this web-site contact:  webmaster