h-rtitle.gif (7604 bytes)

Crime - Organised - Institutionalised - Corruption - Fraud - Protection Rackets, run and managed by judicial chair occupants, in a free-for-all state of abundance. Note below the arrangements between the administrative, the judiciary and the media; read of the all-embracing guarantee in place, in contempt of all law : the root shall be pointed to.

WHERE IS JUSTICE? Read below:-

"The court has inherent jurisdiction to stay an action which must fail; as, for instance an action brought in respect of an act of State"

*Link from here to founder's tribulations in 1972-75 and marvel at the creativity of allegedly honourable officers of Justice and the Law in the mother of all PSEUDOdemocracies

  • And by extension any act of any public servant who is appointed, retained and maintained by other public servants for all of whom, the state, as employer, is ultimately responsible, including abusers of judicial chair occupancy. Hence, the billions paid out as covered in the affidavit which visitors can link to directly from here [*Link].
  • Link also from here to the founder's conclusions as of 1972-75 when the great Metropolitan police were seen to be nothing but accessories to and abettors of the rampant fraud and corruption through the courts organised and processed to fruition while Members of Parliament were -as they still do- promoting the waffle that amounts to nothing short of:-

'independence of the judiciary to act in contempt of ALL LAW (national and international) in a pseudo-democracy.

*Link from here to proof of the parts the police play in promotion and expansion of the criminal activities instigated, processed and imposed on society by the legal circles. Read of assertions by a typical hypocrite, none other than the Commissioner of the Metropolitan Police, Sir Robert Mark QPM, when he spoke of FALSE RECORDS / FORGERIES by the legal circles while delivering his famous Dimbleby Lecture on BBC-TV in November 1973, 15 months after he received true copy of THE FORGERY advanced and promoted by the licensed criminals : solicitors and barristers for their evil ends in the case that opened Andrew Yiannides' mental eyes to the realities of life in the United Kingdom, a typical PSEUDOdemocracy. Can anyone enlighten Andrew and the millions of victims of the legal circles WHY NO PROSECUTION of the solicitors & the barristers in 1972 or thereafter?.

  • With such a facility in place (the words we point to above) and arrogant abuse of public office, can anyone assert, or argue, that Mr Andrew Yiannides, the founder of human-rights, was not right to determine that Justice has been abducted and that she is held captive in the dungeons maintained by her abductors who rape her daily in their courts? (>Hence the c reation of www.jusaticeraped.org <)
  • ALL Member States of the European Union are subject to the ruling which visitors, readers and researchers can access in the explicit page /yourrights.htm

*Link from here to the realities - in due course also a link to the warning (indirect but nonetheless very clear) for thinkers to recognise 

  • On 3rd March 2008 >someone's birthday< we released a House of Lords PRECEDENT CASE and reveal deliberations by their Lordships in respect of FRAUD - DECEPTION - CONSPIRACY & IMPLIED LIES BY KEEPING SILENT about any wrong imposed on any other.
  • >>> IN THE MEANTIME we have been naming and shaming a number who know of and engage in much more than just approve wrongs imposed on Mr & Mrs Average, the millions of taxpayers, in our allegedly civilised country / state / province / district of the European Union created by politicians, without reference to the taxed for fraud sucker-serfs, allegedly for the benefit of the citizens from FRAUD & CORRUPTION, among other promotions.

Needless to say the case entailed activities and practices by solicitors as Mr Andrew Yiannides was subjected to, decades later, by an old school friend, Mr Kypros Nichola of Nicholas & Co. in London. Mr K. Nichola bluntly abused the trust placed in him and indulged, in tandem with others, in criminal activities intended to cause the damages that were imposed on the targeted 'serf' by accredited - by the Law Society & Bar Council - allegedly Honourable Officers of the Supreme Court, the courts maintained by successive elected governments in the United Kingdom, one of many pseudodemocracies. In due course another revelation relevant to the arrogant 'inherent jurisdiction', through which to deny, obstruct justice & impose all manner of criminally created states on 'the serfs', who are taxed for the cost of maintaining criminals in public office, in pseudo-democracies.

RESPONSIBLE FOR THE STATE OF AFFAIRS, successive irresponsible Lord Chancellors and Home Secretaries who ignored and ignore all complaints and submissions by victims of the organised crimes we point to and expose in our pages, irrespective of the evidence and the law pointed to, by the victims of it all, the citizens who are called upon to pay taxes for the maintenance of criminals in public office.

[*Link from here to our exclusive page, covering confidential fraud as arranged THROUGH THE BEST KEPT OPEN SECRET in alleged democracies, European States. Elsewhere the foundations and corner stone upon which the operatives built the societies of their making using the bricks and mortar we cover in this and other pages. The visitor should not be under any illusion that the stars in the theatrical productions, covered in our pages were by any stretch of the imagination 'humans' who were / are gifted with any attributes that distinguish 'true humans' (>thinkers<) from animals.

Fraud in court  Council staff use Forgeries   Misconduct in Public Office. 2 cases relative to applicable law One Protocol says it ALL It betrays arrogant intentions Law Provides for THEFTS and it covers Judges too Judges' duties   TIME 4 CHANGE   & CHALLENGES Site CONTENTS - Table of Contents & ongoing work Your Rights & OBLIGATIONS to Society SITE SEARCH facility for any specific element / issue of concern to visitors / readers
COURTS : their Facilities Abused For ORGANISED CRIME : FRAUD Solicitor's Perjury & Victim Ignores it all Just like the Law Society always does Blackmailed or is it Just Conditioned & Subjugated Victims who join the club ? We name Lovers of blunt fraud through courts - Users of the facilities 4 illicit gains Local Authorities & FRAUD on 'serfs' the Taxpayers who are kept in the dark Police Party to & Endorsing Criminal Acts, Activities Arrogant Fraud FALSE Records & Contempt of Law by the legal Circles & Public Services The crafty ones & Vexatious Litigant PLOYS for the rewarded silent

* Information FOR victims who wish to co-operate by EXPOSING & CHALLENGING abusers of Public Office *

family.uk-human-rights justiceraped.org dssfraud.htm confraud.htm dadscare.htm contract.htm converts.htm MensAid
solicitorsfromhell.co.uk chancellor.htm theyknow.htm solfraud.htm sheknows.htm 4deceit.htm convicti.htm forward.htm


*Link from here to evidence. *Link also from here to a case when the abusers of the courts' facilities abandoned their plans for another targeted family

IMPORTANT INFORMATION for all victims of malpractice - misconduct - negligence, etc. TO NOTE

In the civil justice system in England and Wales, a judge presides over the proceedings that are argued by the opposing sides through the adversarial process. The process enables the court, judge, to reach a conclusion as to the truth of the facts in dispute. Thereat it is for the judge to apply the law to the facts proven, established at court.

The system as evolved is covered in the page 'English Legal System' and remains the same after the Woolf reforms.

An explicit Affidavit [*L] plus exhibits and
     letters to a Chief Inspector of Police
          one to solicitors
[*L] and another to the Lord Chancellor [*L] evince
               ORGANISED CRIMES
(Access and read the letter to the police in September 2006 [*L])

Access & read from one of a number of letters to the Prime Minister : * I believe that New Labour will deliver us from the wrongs we have been suffering for far too long. Use of our resources in terms of human potential and capabilities can and should be channelled through rights not wrongs, through positives not through negatives. It is our produce and ingenuity we can sell to others not the minefields of corrupt and bankrupt public services. * [*Link from here to the page, note the steps taken to ensure the Prime Minister forwarded / delegated submissions and evidence received at 10 Downing Street to the right Minister / Ministry because the submissions were in respect of ORGANISED CRIMES

3rd March 2011 added link [*L] to the BBC-TV Dimbleby Lecture in 1973 as the Metropolitan Police Commissioner, Sir Robert Mark prepared & presented to the sucker-serfs


Crime - Organised -Institutionalised - Corruption - Fraud - Protection Rackets,  run and managed by judicial chair occupants, in a free-for-all state of abundance. Note the all-embracing guarantee, in place but in contempt of all law:
"The court has inherent jurisdiction to stay an action which must fail; as, for instance an action brought in respect of an act of State". (And by extension any act of any public servant who is appointed, retained and maintained by other public servants for all of whom, the state, as employer, is ultimately responsible, including abusers of judicial chair occupancy and hence, the billions paid out as covered in the exclusive affidavit that visitors can link to directly from here - *Link also to the founder's conclusions as of 1972-75 when the great Metropolitan police were seen to be nothing but accessories and abettors of the rampant fraud and corruption through the courts while Members of Parliament were -as they still do- promoting the waffle that amounts to nothing short of 'independence of the judiciary to act in contempt of ALL of Parliament's Laws in a pseudo-democracy).

ACCOUNTABLE FOR THE STATE OF AFFAIRS, successive irresponsible Lord Chancellors and Home Secretaries who ignored (Fx) all complaints and submissions irrespective of the evidence and the law pointed to, by the victims of it all, the citizens who are called upon to pay taxes for the maintenance of criminals in public office.(*Link to our exclusive page, covering confidential fraud as arranged THROUGH THE BEST KEPT OPEN SECRET in alleged democracies, European States). Page Revised: June 20, 2012

locauthor.htm          KEY Page Changes 3 June 2005

Local Authorities * Reconstructed: June 20, 2012 *
hrbnrsml.gif (1162 bytes) JOIN the Community On Line and publish facts and evidence. Use your rights in law. Invite the offenders to sign and return to you  the explicit DECLARATION you can print from our pages and if they fail to do so EXPOSE them as offenders by relying on the same principles as our judges promoted and used when Garry Glitter & Lord Archer declined to take the stand and give evidence, submit to cross examination.

KEY to Page / Site          The PERSONS page - List The ISSUES - page - List The VENUES - List      Your Rights - ECoHR & EU DEDICATION  of web-site LETTERS TO - List LETTERS FROM - List    SITE PAGES List       OTHER SITES - List      PAGE QUOTES - List        SITE QUOTES - Page List UPDATED PAGES - List
part 1
part 2
part 3
part 4
part 5
part 6
part 1
part 2
part 3
part 4
part 5
part 6     

Arrogant council staff recognise no law and they all rely on other public servants to misconduct in public office - Local Courts heviar1r.jpg (55554 bytes) Read this letter and access:-   Cowboy lawyers  and the  Facts on affidavit

The Court of Appeal ruling to the point. Yet they all dreamt they could proceed to conversions of rents, owing, to alleged legal costs via theatrical productions in the relevant county court. nodamer1.gif (37873 bytes)  Note NO damages, even for  'Wrongful eviction based on Shorthold Tenancy Agreements. Access:- Letter from Council Dreamer  National Scandal (page)

We publish below a 1997 REPORT from a local newspaper. It covers the very issues as the report above. The FACTS OF LIFE within Haringey Council. An enterprising member of staff doing for himself that which he was doing with and for others; as he learned of in the course of his training. How to treat moneys belonging to others. Who could blame him?  Suppression of the facts. Misinformation for the gullible, in both local and  National newspapers !hobenjar.jpg (90509 bytes) The Enterprising member of staff at Haringey Council  swindles £100,000 !!!!!

We publish below the REPORT in the Hornsey and Crouch End Journal of 31st December 1998.  It covers the fact that the Council was to benefit from extra cash from central government after an explicit letter,  dated 18 December 1998,  was sent to the Rt. Hon. Jack Straw, the Home Secretary.fun4harf.jpg (65627 bytes) Barely 12 days after the explicit letter reached  its destination and through the article proof that positive Action was taken.

In February 1998, we noted also, in a local NEWSPAPER REPORT,  that  the rampant frauds were featured.  WE CAUSED the scams to be EXPOSED in the local papers after years of frustrating obstructions and volumes of paper work imposed on us  by the corrupt and the corrupted.  Many had been closing their ears and their eyes. They had nothing to say on the serious issues presented to them. ALL ignored the evidence and the facts, safe that certain actions taken were pre-emptive activities. The documented evidence, masses  of letters etc., can never be erased and or ignored by any decent citizen, now.scambenr.jpg (50660 bytes) In our letter,  of 18th Dec. 1998,  to the Home Secretary we urged SFO and Public Auditors Investigations.

In 'The Times' of 17th November 1997, the news that a Rights Bill was on the horizon. The miracle  bilorigf.jpg (128165 bytes) occurred because in an overpayments case Enfield Council were challenged appropriately and blunt violations of stated ECoHR articles were pleaded by the targeted victim. A Defence and Counterclaim was filed and served. Link To a relevant paragraph for  brief details.

In the Daily Mail, of 8th April 1998, reference to alleged complacency by Council staff in the matter of Fraudulent Social Security claims.  Housing Benefit Funds  Distributed as organised by Public Servants who misconduct in public office and such activities are nowhere mentioned, in the article!800mhbfr.jpg (48618 bytes) Go to the free for all page as proclaimed on 30th July 2001 by the government when some of the truths, we have been exposing, were 'admitted' officially. And from 800 million the sucker citizens who pay taxes FOR RAMPANT FRAUDULENT ACTIVITIES were informed of 2.8 billion as the 'stolen funds'.

The Persons
1.  Letting Agents, Crooks
2.  Tenants, Used Crooks
3.  Council Staff, Crooks
4.  Council Officers 
5.  Councillors, dishonest 
6.  Chief Executive, crook
7.  Police Officers, Default  8.  Rent Officer 
9.  Magistrates Court  
10. Our Public Servants 
11. County Court Officers  12. C.I.C.A Officers, staff  13. Solicitors, dishonest
14. Barristers, abettors 
15. Newspapers, default
16. Modern Robin Hoods
part 1
part 2
part 3
part 4
part 5

The Issues
1. Fraud by Public Servants
2. Creative Accountancy
3. False Instruments
5. Misappropriated Benefit
6. Fraudulent Demands  
7. Police-Invisible Services
8. Abuse Public Facilities
9. Abuse Legal Aid Facility 10. Government Invited to
11. Abuse-Court Facilities
12. Fraud Through Courts  13. Constructive FRAUDS  14. Torment And Torture 
15. Police Ignore Witness 
16. The Judge's Duty
18. Police Promote CRIME
19. Institutionalised Crime
part 4
part 5
part 6

C. The Evidence
1. C.o.A Law Report
2. Letter Evincing Reliance
4. Letter Withdrawing A Fraudulent Demand
part 1
part 2
part 3

Page Quotes
European Union Law provides for the citizens to be protected from FRAUD and CORRUPTION
2. FRAUD Challenged.
Officially created fraud on unsuspecting citizens who then have to  rely on the 'merchants of misery' © in order  to challenge the creative accountancy practices by officially appointed and retained in office criminals.
4. Let Barrabas go & crucify Christ their motto
part 5
part 6

The Venues
Haringey Council
2. Haringey Magistrates
3. Haringey Police
4. Edmonton County Court
part 6

undercon.gif (286 bytes) Page Created Feb. 1997- Site under reconstruction

Staff - VIOLATIONS -  in law

The days when public servants relied on the BLIND DEAF AND DUMB MEDIA BARONS AND THEIR STOOGES ARE OVER.  The days when ALL relied on BLIND DEAF AND DUMB officers within the law enforcement agencies, are also over. This is the age of FREE exchange of information and THE unadulterated FACTS OF LIFE within all states, so long as their citizens are free to exercise, AS WE DO, their basic human-rights that ARE GUARANTEED under the European Convention on Human Rights.(ECoHR) (*Link to other Articles   of the European Convention and site)

Article 13.(repeated here) "EVERYONE whose rights and freedoms as set forth in this Convention are violated SHALL have an effective remedy before a national authority notwithstanding that the violation HAS BEEN committed by persons acting in an OFFICIAL CAPACITY."

Article 13 is VERY CLEAR. WHERE IS THE NATIONAL AUTHORITY THAT LOOKS INTO THE VIOLATIONS judges in the United Kingdom endorse, entertain AND INSTIGATE of their own?  The question is simple and the Lord Chancellor with the Home Secretary should co-operate and produce the formula under which the citizens CAN challenge activities that blatantly breach national law and VIOLATE Human Rights.   NOTE PLEASE:  We have on record a high court case where the Judge made an issue of the serious ERROR of judgements (practices in our view) by the Ombudsman. All is not as the public is told and as the multitude of facts we publish PROVE BEYOND ANY REASONABLE DOUBT TO THE average citizen. The citizens demand that they be treated no more as illiterate serfs of  the middle ages and or as subjects to the whims and or the abusive dishonesty of so called 'public servants'; the 'alleged servants of the public' who serve other ulterior motives* which they fail to declare.*

The European Union Treaties succinctly provide that the citizens shall be protected from FRAUD and CORRUPTION. It is time for all quangos and public servants, inclusive of all retained within the Law Enforcement Agencies, to abandon the free for all they have been and some are indulging in as the Appeals and affidavits we publish evince and ESTABLISH beyond any doubt.

FRAUD CHALLENGED: THE OVERPAYMENTS FALLACY. Blunt FRAUD founded, resting and created by the administrating middle men - the Local Authorities through their well tutored and trained staff and officers. They make demands, from targeted landlords, for the return of funds, allegedly paid in error, etc. They label such demands as alleged overpayments and hey... presto.... officially created fraud on the unsuspecting citizens who would normally rely on the 'merchants of misery' © to challenge the creative accountancy practices by officially appointed and retained in office criminals. The letter below, from Haringey Council, makes clear the fact that staff and officers HAD DETERMINED they had the right to seek and demand recovery of much needed funds in the usual fashion. They had been insisting on that course of action irrespective of clear statements in lengthy communications from the targeted victim. The name of the person assisting the targeted victim was spelled wrongly in the letter for inexplicable reasons, safe the fact that the very person was being denied a hearing proper in matters arising out of and in another, similar case and scenario.

The issues raised by and in the other case are partly (note please) stated in the explicit appeal we publish in our pages. In that instance transfer, misappropriation and otherwise distribution and dissemination of Housing Benefit funds was indulged into through use of a forgery. Later two subsequent clones were introduced by the criminals employed and tutored by the council's gurus. In that case Haringey Council staff and officers were relying on their partners in deception and dishonest handling of the properties of others, the managers and controllers of the Letting Agency. Between them relying on the relevant county court and its officers to impose/perpetrate/cause and endorse the intended constructive frauds and criminal damages on the targeted landlords. The managing agents, were relied upon to block the demanded Review Board hearing in that case, AS THEY HAD ARRANGED WITH THE COUNCIL STAFF AND OFFICERS.  Letters proving the arrangements between the conspirators can be published and the targeted private landlord will be caused to review his own part and mistakes in the matters attached to the constructive frauds.

ovewit1r.jpg (78510 bytes) Page 1.

"Council notified by the DSS that the claimant had been excluded as of March from receiving Housing Benefit"! A typical assertion based on convenient mistakes, oversight and or errors if not arrangements between public servants, who are engaged and trained in the promotion of the CIUKU enterprises. Reliance on such impossibilities in the days of Information Technology at the touch of a button. Inexcusable improprieties and attempts through which to generate and create work for the "Merchants of Misery ©", solicitors who service the "Self Perpetuating Cancerous Growth Industry ©" through the practices we expose and challenge in our pages.

ovewit2r.jpg (73004 bytes) Page 2.

".... landlord had not materially contributed to the omission by the officers of the Department of Social Security to notify the Council..." The enterprising wasters of the time of the targeted citizens KNEW ALL ALONG that such was the situation. They get paid to mess around with the rights to life, as the citizens plan for themselves and their families. Public servants acting in contempt of and in breach of Parliament's and International Law. We refer our visitors to the sections of the Criminal Justice Act 1988 to which we drew the attention of the Attorney General, as we published in the Stephen Lawrence pages. (Back to Haringey: Review Board changed directions , assisted HONEST persons)

OUR INVITATION TO GOVERNMENT:- Should the government wish to set up an inquiry and or investigation proper, we shall be happy to provide full particulars and other instances where Council staff and officers, county court staff and officers and police officers, all the way to the office of the Commissioner for the Metropolitan Police all actively engaged in the promotion of the CIUKU enterprises. In the event that the police and Central Government carry on defaulting to take steps to correct the errors of the ways of public servants and to ensure that the citizens rights are restored with provisions for dealing with damages caused through such activities we shall not hesitate to publish full particulars and ALL letters evincing the ostrich acts of many in public office. 

The CoA law report ( link ) covers aspects attached to Shorthold Tenancy Agreements. No sooner had the judgement been pronounced and a member of staff from Haringey Council, was writing to the landlady and her agent to promote assertions that were contrary to the legal position; the author, we understand, is no longer employed at Haringey Council. We have on record other issues that we may be forced to publish if public servants carry on ignoring Parliament's Law. The questionable activities of Public Servants within Local Authorities, such as Haringey Council in North London, have been the subject matter of well documented highly questionable acts in breach of The Law* and the principles of law. Irrespective of the law, as it was at the time of the CoA Law report we publish in this page, Public Servants and two firms of solicitors were indulging themselves. They were relying on Legal Aid Certificates to fleece the targeted victim, as with and by others arranged.

The Court of Appeal Law Report qualifies that both lawyers were ignoring the very ruling. From within the local court they were being assisted by Public Servants to seek conversion of the rents due and payable to the targeted landlord. Through Misappropriation, by local authority staff, Housing Benefit funds earmarked for the creation of alleged legitimate legal costs through attempted theatrical productions at court. All via abuse of Legal Aid Facilities, care of public servants.

The letter ( link ) of 26th March 1996, from the member of staff from Haringey Council in North London went further and exposed reliance on 'the relevant county court' the officers of which ignored 'The LAW' and bend the rules.

The arrogant author was quoting an Act of Parliament, years out of date, and without any reference to the Act under which the Shorthold Tenancy Agreement had been entered into between landlord and tenant.  The audacity of the author extended to assertions irrespective of the fact that the tenant HAD already MOVED out most of her belongings after giving notice that she was moving out with substantial rent arrears.

WORSE was the insolence of the author who exposed Council reliance on the 'relevant county court'. The officers, and even the clerical staff, of that court' assuming authorities above the jurisdiction and ruling of the Court of Appeal

At least four cases were referred to the Lord Chancellor personally. His Lordship was requested to call in the files of all the cases from the court. He was called upon to justify the activities and the defaults of the officers of 'the relevant county court'. We simply add that in all cases the officers of 'the very court' failed and defaulted, with intent, to issue and grant Judgements resting on Default Summonses arising out of failures by the tenants to remit RENTS to their landlords. We add that the tenants, in two of the cases, HAD BEEN RECEIVING HOUSING BENEFIT while the council staff were asserting and alleging the tenants had either not furnished the Council with the essential information and or documents thus hindering the processing of the respective claims. As alternative 'reasons' the Council staff, had been asserting inability to process the applications because they lost and or misplaced the relevant files, and if not, that excuse they would allege the Council computer system had failed, crashed, etc., etc. The rule for interim payments, within 14 days, ALWAYS ignored by Council staff, whenever targeting specific victims of the scams and their constructive fraud activities, in tandem with others.

EVEN WORSE, in one instance, the tenant allegedly was given a substantial amount of funds through use of a FORGERY. He failed to remit the contracted rents to the landlord. The Council Staff and the Letting Agents, contemptuously, defaulted to submit the FORGERY TO THE POLICE even though they were invited to do so. ALL RELIED UPON AND USED IT, kept it IN THEIR FILES for almost a year and relied on the police to default in the execution of their Public Duties. You, the citizens of the world, the Jury, are called upon to refer to The LAW* document we publish in our web-site pages. The LAW is succinct and clear:-  INDICTABLE OFFENCES for aiding a person to evade / default to meet EXISTING LIABILITIES.

HARINGEY COUNCIL STAFF KNEW NO BOUNDARIES. They recognised no law, yet asserted many a fraudulent misrepresentation through and because of reliance on 'the relevant court' ( link ) and the author of the letter dared refer to an Act of Parliament, irrespective of the explicit terms of the Shorthold Tenancy Agreement in their files.

DO NOTE that the £10 difference between the 'average 2 bedroom flat' (£190) and the rent the local letting agency 'negotiated with the tenants and or the local authority staff, on behalf of their principals' (£180) was not enough for the participating in the scams dishonest partners in constructive frauds. To all intents and purposes the property owner was meant to receive officially £165 per week. The £165 per week, purportedly, was the rent approved for the property by a rent officer benefiting from an explicit relationship with the Local Authority; arrangements that make 'impartiality' a joke and 'material for distribution to the naive and morons'. Rent officers, conveniently, are on the pay roll of local authorities.

Rent for the very property had been negotiated, earlier, at £220 per week through another co-operating letting agent / agency. It was not enough to negotiate(?) and to 'arrange for a new contracted rent' below market value for the property as declared in official documents. Council staff and Letting Agents considered, also, prudent and honourable to assert and declare to the landlord, that the property merited even less. Through their silence they allowed and encouraged, the tenant to proclaim even less. The tenants asserted, to the landlords, that the new approved rent was only in the sum of £145 per week. Council officers and their legal boffins could and did rely on amenable, to the scams, 'court staff and officers within 'the relevant county court'.

The tenants, encouraged as they were, remitted to the landlord, only OCCASIONALLY, rent for the property. The tenants thus built up under various pretexts, with assistance from the local authority staff, a substantial debt. The staff of the local authority then CHOSE TO IGNORE the maximum 8 weeks rent/debt rule and regulations. Worse they allegedly ignored the letting/managing agents who  were participating in the constructive frauds. EVEN worse, IN CONTEMPT of  'The LAW' all who took and take part, in such schemes, acted and carried in acting in breach of the provisions of the THEFT AND COUNTERFEIT ACTS. Parliament purportedly enacts Law to protect the citizens. OUR elected politicians and government appoint, to such 'prestigious' and 'privileged positions', Law Enforcement Agents, who are meant to serve us, the citizens, as PUBLIC SERVANTS, impartially and without discrimination on any grounds as Article 14 of the ECoHR, provides.

The Council staff and officers after remitting funds to the indebted tenant, in contravention of the aforementioned rule and in breach of ACTS OF PARLIAMENT, they advanced, promoted and relied on USE OF A FORGERY in futile attempts to justify their failures to remit ANY rents to the landlord and or to the co-operating in the scams letting/managing agents. THE EVIDENCE is too clear and the police indulged and carry on in their usual games for months and years and only ready to suggest 'their usual tangent exercises'. Proposing an inquiry and investigation, not of the crimes but one based on the failings of their colleagues! Another Lawrence fiasco scenario the area in which the Metropolitan Police excels. Failure to take proper statements from a material witness attached to their unwillingness to bring about prosecutions of  the criminals who steal to secure funds for their salaries. The FORGERIES treated as incidental and immaterial instruments for the acts of deception, dishonest handling, and fraudulent distribution and THEFT of funds belonging to others! To the discredit Metropolitan Police the Theft Acts were/are published in invisible ink and apparently not in Braille, for the blind among their circles to know of.

The police, as the Stephen Lawrence Saga*;and inquiry established, have other agendas to serve.* Positive discrimination against targeted landlords and their priorities servicing the needs of criminals and the parasites among them. Blunt omissions, and defaults by the police who failed to take any statements from the person who submitted copies of the initial and the two subsequent forgeries to them, are matters NOW, for the Home Secretary and the persons who determine that by an Act of God they have the right to act as modern day Robin Hoods and to steal (robbing) under cover of shady acts (hoods), not from their rich friends and mates down the road, but from the frugal and creative, Mr and Mrs Average. And our modern day Robin ('robbing) Hoods (under the 'hoods' disguising their true undeclared aims) busy distributing the spoils of their God given rights to act outside Parliament's Laws, to their chosen circles, to their imported tools and proteges that their mates in other lands, in tandem, created for and through other gains from spoils for and from warmongering activities at the expense of Mr and Mrs Average, world-wide. And the scriptwriters of such scenarios treating today's world citizens as yesteryear serfs and as illiterate peasants of the Middle Ages.

The police electing throughout to ignore the person who has full knowledge of the facts they have chosen to disregard for over four years, for obvious reasons to any person who is gifted with a slight hint of common sense and logic. They simply do not wish for the facts and the evidence to be officially recorded, as in many other instances they 'systematically' indulge. Reckless indifference for no good cause safe the promotion of CRIME through endorsement, if not contempt for the rights in law of the victims. Yet again the "Let Barrabas live; crucify Christ" policy!

MANY the submissions to all; especially to the police who were called in to conduct an investigation proper BECAUSE OF THE FORGERY that gave birth to the other two FORGERIES at a very crucial point in time. They were meant to charge the OFFENDERS, those who indulged in THEFTS through deception, dishonesty and misappropriation of funds (moneys belonging to others).  The main offenders sitting,  for well over a year, on a Section 9 Statement signed by the victim of all, the landlord. The offenders did make USE OF AND RELIED ON BLATANT FORGERIES to justify misappropriation attempts and THEFTS (plural intended) yet the police simply drag their feet for their own reasons. The 'relevant county court and its officers' aware of the scams and the frauds on the private landlords and THE STATE, on the Social Security FUNDS. Nothing but misconduct in public office* and endorsement of CRIME. Refer to the Appeal we published because of wilful failures by all to act, safe to give extra funds to the promoters of the free for and the land of milk and honey reputation they built on thefts and INSTITUTIONALISED CRIME, through their CORRUPT PRACTICES that our pages cover.

We publish (*Link in the left panel) A NEWSPAPER REPORT covering the scams they were caused to deal with.  WE CAUSED the scams to be EXPOSED in the local papers following years of frustrating work and volumes of paper work imposed by the corrupt and the corrupted.  Many had been closing their ears and their eyes. They had nothing to say on the serious issues presented to them. ALL ignored the evidence and the facts, safe that certain actions taken were pre-emptive activities. The documented evidence, masses  of letters etc., can never be erased and or ignored by any decent citizen, now.

Back to National Scandal: Council Staff Scams , Haringey: they didn't know , forgeries to the police

We first became aware of the facts of life at Haringey in March/April 1996. For months lies and fabrications (recorded, audio tapes) attached to inexcusable falsehoods (fully covered by The LAW* we publish on our web-site) were advanced, promoted and relied upon by the criminals in the confines of the local authority. As we put these pages together, now, we are waiting for 'The LAW' to be applied in the very serious case of the FORGERIES used and relied upon by the criminals. Through the FORGERIES diverting and denying access to funds, the properties of the targeted victims.  Private landlords seen and treated as easy prey by the dishonest who relied and still appear to be relying on 'public servants to default'; to misconduct in public office.  We will not hesitate to publish ALL of the documented evidence at our disposal IF THE INTENDED VICTIMS are not fully recompensed in every respect. The victims must receive forthwith the rents they ARE OWED and have been denied access to for far too long through THE SCAMS AND THE CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUDS ONE AND ALL INDULGED IN.       

In another case we caused the government to rush and announce the 'Bill of Rights'. The report above/left, in 'The Times' of December 17th, 1997 qualifies: "THE BILL WILL MAKE MORALITY PART OF THE LAW"! ( link ) The events that led to the announcement arose out of the organised deceptions, the dishonest handling and distribution of Housing Benefit Funds, entrusted to and at the disposal of Local Authority staff and officers. It was but a typical attempt by public servants to defraud targeted victims through misconduct in public office and ABUSE OF THE FACILITIES, as arranged through the CIUKU enterprises. From within the confines of another Local Authority, staff and officers instituted county court proceedings for and in respect of alleged 'Housing Benefit Overpayments'. As usual, they had ignored all correspondence on the matter and the issues arising out of their 'adamant demands'. CONVENIENTLY, and in the usual fashion, they proceeded to issue the Summons out of 'the relevant county court'.  A Defence and COUNTERCLAIM was settled, lodged at court and served. Without any notification and or hearing at court, an amenable court officer, proceeded to issue a court Order simply striking out the counterclaim.  An appropriate APPEAL was settled, lodged at court and served on the offending 'public servants'. Copy of the Appeal was also sent to the Lord Chancellor's office. Thereafter the 'dictators' who had issued 'false instruments' were caused to re-instate the Counterclaim. The Lord Chancellor and his officer HAD BEEN INFORMED that as the Defendants had pleaded violations of fundamental human rights the case could not be dealt with in our theatres of justice.  It would be transferred to the Court at Strasbourg because our judges had no jurisdiction on the matter, care of OUR PARLIAMENT in an alleged Democracy founded and resting on the rule of Law and Order. The Lord Chancellor's office was informed that because of the issues AND LAW PLEADED the move would be but a formality. The Defendants would not be agreeable to wasting years in the theatres of justice as maintained and run by successive Governments some forty years after drafting (copying and amending parts of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights) and signing up to the European Convention on Human Rights and other international treaties and accords. The offenders were caused to re-instate the Counterclaim. A number of other 'improprieties, false statements and assertions had been indulged at court. The court in re-instating had issued also directions in the matter. There followed attempts by the court staff and the legal team of Enfield Council to 'railroad the case into other avenues'. These were appropriately challenged and the court 'eventually' was caused to invite the offending Local Authority, and its legal team, to withdraw Enfield Council's ill-founded claim and to enter a 'non suite' plea. (Back to Haringey: relying on the officers .. )

The article from 'The Times' categorical BUT it establishes the issue covered in our founder's conclusion. The news item we looked upon as the Lord Chancellor's way of stating that our citizen's rights in law would be kept in the hands of administrators who have no time for justice and contempt for Parliament's Laws. (Back to Haringey: The FACTS , )

The above facts and our statements are fully documented. We publish below an explicit letter covering another attempt by staff and officers at Haringey Council to defraud another private landlord as they targeted.  They had been demanding from the victim alleged "recoverable Housing Benefit Overpayments"; the Council's avenue in creative accountancy practices, through which to reduce its liabilities.

Back to, National Scandal: Complacency Local Scam: Haringey Council

The fact remains that for over three years we had been drawing attention to the unacceptable behaviour of far too many members of staff at Haringey Council.  Our submissions and letters were ignored by one and all.  ALL asserting, in much the same arrogance, their reliance on others to misconduct in public office* and to  ignore The Law* as we were pointing out and the Daily Mail promoted in their article / investigation in June 1997.  Our submissions and the evidence we were referring to all, including the Daily Mail, predate the article; our letters to many also predate the said report. The £800 million is a very low estimate when  one considers the knock on effect, the waste of resources and the ABUSE of the Legal Aid facilities by rogue lawyers* as the lord chancellor's department referred to members of the profession 'using' refugees in scams such as we have had to challenge for over 30 months on behalf of targeted victims in one instance. One couple, private landlords, invested for their retirement in a pension earning property; the landlords wishing NOT to be a burden on society. HOWEVER OTHERS had their plans for their properties; building and rents/funds due and payable under the terms of SHORTHOLD TENANCY agreements.

We refer to unacceptable behaviour by far too many members of staff. The letter from Haringey Council, that we publish below covers the creative accountancy practices through the organised arrangements in the execution of the CIUKU enterprises. Alleged rights to recover, even through downright deductions from other rents due and payable, allegedly because X claimant was not entitled to the Housing Benefit we (as alleged complacent public servants) claimed for and on behalf of X claimant from Central Government.  We did use the contract you signed and even though we know the tenant claimant WAS GENUINE and in occupation of your property, now that he has gone we are making this claim for claw backs because we need to bolster our income and to reduce our debts. The letter from the council clarifies 'withdrawal' of the persistent and adamant demands for refunds without proper and sound foundation in fact or law, by the greedy and needy. The 'targeted victim' as an HONEST person did not rely on members of the organised TRIADS operating in our country but was assisted, for the purposes of the Housing Benefit Review Board 'hearing'. We have covered the names of the parties involved, dates etc. because we wish to protect the innocent from the dishonest and the maligned activities of persons who misconduct in public office.

(Back to: National Scandal:  well organised , Haringey: dishonesty and lies  )



Page Revised: June 20, 2012.

Link to:   The LAW    ECoHR(more rights)    Other Priorities to serve
Link to:   Complaints against Local Authorities    The Police    Fraud Vitiates Judgements    GREED
Back to HomePage


The creator of this website was inviting victims to access URrights & join him there with other victims to expose & challenge abusers of trust & public office until the providers of the facilities >ning.com< introduced new terms and conditions for the provision of the facilities. Access from here and read of the imposed states by the brains behind ning.com and consider only one element "WHY OBSTRUCT & HINDER THE DOWNLOAD of the existing material at URrights.ning.com >the intellectual properties of the creator of that presence on the Internet and those who joined him there? Read below of the unacceptable conduct and behaviour by the reckless abusers of trust, who set out to obstruct and blackmail the creator of URrights.ning

Persons who are genuinely concerned and object to the ways they were / are being treated by alleged servants of the publicand the law >in any PSEUDOdemocracy, or whatever states / conditions they are subjected to< by abusers of public facilities and public office >as we cover in our web-pages< should contact webmaster@human-rights.org for information relevant to the creation of similar facilities for INFOrmation on URrights, for facilities for URrights EUrope and for a NETwork of URrights activists.

  • APOLOGIES to friends and persons who could not access URrights following the recent changes by the providers of the facility (ning.com) Andrew Yiannides created and used the portal to create the presence on the Internet for the group of victims / challengers who joined with him to expose and challenge the arrogant and blunt abuse of public services in all allegedly civilised societies > PSEUDODEMOCRACIES <.

  • The changes related to the introduction of charges for the facilities, included the facility for ning.com to archive the material at URrights; also the facility to download the archived material to the creator's system (computer) while the creator and his group of friends considered which of the level of charges and service the group was to adopt.

  • HOWEVER the creator, Andrew Yiannides, WAS UNABLE TO DOWNLOAD THE ARCHIVED MATERIAL and all attempts to engage the providers and their staff in reasonable explanation as to WHY THE FAILURES TO CONNECT / DOWNLOAD from the ning.com servers THE ARCHIVED MATERIAL, were contemptuously ignored.

  • Emails to the Publicity, to the Promotion, to the Public Relations, also to the Chief Executive's Office merited no response whatsoever from anyone acting for ning.com

  • In the circumstances Andrew will appreciate any information related to the problems covered above. Andrew will also appreciate any information relative to exchanges with or email postings, from ning.com to existing members.

  • EXISTING URrights members, victims of the legal system, victims of solicitors and the courts should access the updated pages at .org/solicitors.htm and .org/solfraud.htm by using the links from the list below.

Below pages where we expose known lovers of it all, users and maintenance engineers of the system as is

.org/1999dfax.htm .org/1ofmany.htm .org/2lipstalk.htm .org/4deceit.htm .org/absolute.htm .org/abusers.htm
.org/account4.htm .org/actors.htm .org/actors2.htm .org/adoko.htm .org/bankers.htm .org/beware.htm
.org/blunket1.htm .org/chaldep1.htm .org/confraud.htm .org/contract.htm .org/convicti.htm .org/courts.htm
.org/corruptcourts.htm .org/crimesin.htm .org/dreamers.htm .org/evesused.htm .org/evilones.htm .org/famfraud.htm
.org/govolso.htm .org/guesswhy.htm .org/len.htm .org/mauricek.htm .org/media.htm .org/solfraud.htm
.org/solicitors.htm .org/someplan.htm .org/someploy.htm .org/thefacts.htm .org/theproof.htm .org/thenerve.htm
.org/twisted.htm .org/uaccount.htm .org/ukmm.htm .org/uwatchit.htm .org/watchit1.htm .org/yourtax.htm
  • Every single person we name and expose in the above pages elected to ignore THEIR OBLIGATIONS TO REPORT (to 'the serfs' = 'the taxpayers'), THE ABUSERS OF PUBLIC OFFICE & PUBLIC FACILITIES. All were/are relying on the Intellectual Prostitutes, from within the media, to keep it all in the family closet.
  • All, as typical twin-tongue hypocrites carry on complaining about the media for failing to report & for suppressing the facts and the realities they allegdely reported to the hard of hearing, to the otherwise committed angels blowing their silent trumpets for decades, all ready and gearing to welcome the expansion of the New World Order.
  • Of such parts the contributions from and failings of the persons we name and expose, AS IF THEIR OWN SILENCE, THEIR FAILURES  & THEIR BLUNT OBSTRUCTIONS to the work and other actions by the creator of this website, Andrew Yiannides, treated by one and all as if non-existent with the exception when the wily Norman Scarth, set off to abuse the trust he was allowed to benefit from, while his parts and questionable activities / performance were under scrutiny, specifically after HE FAILED to publish the full transcript of the Court of Appeal hearing HE WAS ALLOWED TO RECORD* [*Link from here to the food for thought page created by Andrew Yiannides, in the first instance].
  • Not one ever bothered to address the issues we expose in the explicit page, despite the fact that we have been pointing all of our contacts, since May 1992, to it all.
  • Visitors, readers and researchers are urged / invited to access and read the letter which the Hon. Secretary of the Litigants In Person Society, Mr. Norman Scarth sent to the founder of human-rights, Mr. Andrew Yiannides, reproduced in the page .org/4deceit.htm* [*L]
  • The author's statements, such as 'what for and why seek additional assistance', thereby spelling out his parts as a lover of it all.
  • Common sense dictates, that he should have directed his request to his partners in deceptions aplenty, one & all engaging in fraudulent misrepresentations AND NOTED TO HAVE, WILFULLY, BEEN SUPPRESSING, FROM THE TAXPAYERS, THE FACTS OF LIFE RELATIVE TO THE RAMPANT ABUSE OF THE COURTS FACILITIES as the failure of all to co-operate as covered and pointed to at:- [*L]. One and all fallen to the facilities for fraud aplenty on the taxpayers and the corruption of illiterates in law, the conditioned victims of the legal circles & courts who fall to the blackmail element attached to the REWARD for keeping the realities away from the taxpayers; just like the media and the Ministers responsible for the application of long existing law to the criminal activities we cover in our pages, do.
  • All the while one and all were / are engaging in the scenarios we cover in the exclusive page, which page the author of the letter which Mr Norman Scarth sent to Andrew Yiannides, afforded us the opportunity to address the issue of the contributions of his partners and affiliates in fraud aplenty on the taxpayers; despite the reminder one and all, named in the new page simply shoved it all in the dark corners of their devoid of grey matter skulls, their perverted / corrupted mind(s)

On Sunday morning, the 19th September 2010, the Deputy Prime Minister, leader of the Liberal-Democrats in the course of the BBC TV politics programme, spoke of the coalition government's commitment to address the element of waste and fraud through the public services sector. We trust and hope that the elements we expose in our pages and the parts adopted by the conditioned victims of the legal circles, the persons who engage in PROMOTING & EXPANDING THE ONGOING CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUD ON THE TAXPAYERS, THROUGH ABUSE OF THE COURTS' FACILITIES, will be on the top of the list of government priorities.
Visitors, readers & researchers are urged to access the letters to Minister Frank Field [*L] after he had been directed by the Prime Minister to think/do the unthinkable.
Link also from here [*L] to the explicit letter to the Home Secretary in December 1998 with submissions arising out of the RAMPANT HOUSING BENEFIT FRAUD
On Tuesday 23rd November 2010, 'the Guardian' in its Comment & Debate page carried an article by Nick Clegg, the Deputy Prime Minister. In the evening of the same day the Deputy Prime Minister addressed a large audience at Kings place in respect of the government's changes on university students fees / loans.
Access from here the page where we reproduce an image of 'the Guardian' article & consider the simple fact that we, alone, have been asserting and proclaiming our objections to the theft of funds from the national budget leading to the ever-increasing annual deficit in the state's balance of payments.

ACCESS:  http://www.justice-uk.human-rights.org/ (For an important message at this Community-on-Line web-site) & thereafter,
Access also http://www.law.society.complaints.and.human-rights.org/ (Judge instigates Fraud On Tax Payers - he knows not the difference between 'imposed' & 'no undue influence'). APOLOGIES FOR THE DISAPPEARANCE OF THIS WEBSITE.It appears that the beneficiary of the work, both for applications to the courts in the United Kingdom and the submissions to the European Court for Human Rights* [*Link from here to the Statement of Facts submitted to the ECoHR], arranged with the providers of the free web space to erase the Intellectual Property of Andrew Yiannides, the founder of the human-rights Community-on-Line, without any reference to the creator of the website and owner of the Intellectual Property!
鼯font> Copyright subsists on all material in our web-site, owned by the authors of same.
Visitors can refer to these pages in any non commercial activity, so long as attribution is given as to source. License to use, for commercial or other specific use of the material, shall have been secured in writing first, from the owners of any property and material from these pages. No material shall be reproduced in any form and by any means without prior agreement and or license in writing from the copyright owners. The Press are invited to contact us if they wish to publish material in the Public Interest, As We Do.
For any problems or questions regarding this web-site contact:  webmaster