Crime - Organised - Institutionalised - Corruption - Fraud - Exposing Violations WorldWide
Page Revised: June 20, 2012.
All underlined text with an asterisk indicates a LINK at the bottom of the page
The much revered independence of the judiciary, free to ignore the Law and the evidence lodged at court. Marvel at the capabilities of persons, from within the Lord Chancellor's department, who promote assumed rights by judicial chair occupants to breach CRIMINAL LAW with impunity.
Read the above letter and the citizen's response below, Note the warranted comments and the citizen's OBSERVATIONS.
The above letter was sent to the victim of ALL in "The Breeding Grounds - case"*. Public servants (police and county court staff/officers*) decided the 'victim family of four' HAD NO RIGHTS in Law. The judiciary, the police and every other public servant felt duty bound, as always, to uphold not the law, but the decisions of the lowest of the low (a young constable, a District Judge etc.). The evidence against all we now cover in this web-site, exists. THE relevant pages speak of themselves. Judge for yourself as to the quality of service from within the Lord Chancellor's office and the Department. Recognise why the conclusion "Nothing but impositions through which the income generating practices for the circles from within which they arose to public office in JUDICIAL chairs to act as unwise Solomon's and injudiciously". We afford you the chance to read the letter (above) received from the Department of Civil Operations AND POLICY (a policy that directs public servants to uphold the rights of all judicial persons to act as they please and to serve other 'vested' interests, not justice). The Geoffrey Harold Scriven cases expose very vividly their practices*, their vested interests. The citizen responded to the author of the circular type letter, at the time. Attempts were made recently to contact the author of the letter without success. He might perhaps read these pages, consider that HE was called upon to deal with the issues attached to and arising out of 'The Breeding Grounds - case"* and probably he might now reconsider his 'contemptuous response' to the victims of all. He might now JUSTIFY the ATTEMPTS to obstruct and to DENY JUSTICE to the victim because of the well established and relied upon practices, as in the Scriven... Lawrence.... Scriven.... Lawrence.... Scriven.... Lawrence.... and countless other cases. The theatres..... the theatres....... the theatres.... The well rehearsed and promoted through the centuries SCENARIOS through misuse of and MISCONDUCT in public office.*
(Back to Lord Chancellor: routine responses
The victim-citizen's response and observations to the above letter:-
(a) "this" in the singular,
(b) "countries" in the plural
(c) the apostrophe in the plural goes after the 's' and not before the 's'. It was clear the author of the above letter needed to go back to school to learn English; the Lord Chancellor received such a suggestion from the victim - citizen. Odd that years later, a person sitting in a judicial capacity exhibited similar capabilities and knowledge of the queen's English, in the long drawn out Ebert 'bankruptcy through false instruments' saga.
Needless to say the author was patronising. Note: 'may I suggest'.... from an illiterate who probably got promoted for the brilliant way in which he treated a victim of corrupt practices in the courts the Lord Chancellor maintains with such brilliant assistants as the author of the above letter.
The citizen complains about serious issues such as corrupt practices (the abuse of office simply to generate income for the circles from within which judges in the United Kingdom arise to public office) and the citizen is treated with contempt and or as a moron by an illiterate.
Fail not to note the reference to the existence of an alleged constitution in the country that had NONE apart from the Magna Carta, and even that was abolished on joining the EEC. The citizen eight years on is still waiting to hear from the author of the letter where copy of this countries(?) written constitution can be secured.
FURTHER NOTE that the author, a presumed well versed in the available public services (the CAB in the instance covered in the letter) knows not that the service he was referring to is the ADVICE bureau and not an ADVANCE bureau. Perhaps in the author's mind all from within the Lord Chancellor's Department were as advanced in ENGLISH and LAW as in the 'ways to cover up corruption' as the author of the letter to the victim exhibited. It is clear that the author himself SIGNED the letter; one can further deduce that the author was as careful and DILIGENT when he was reading the citizen's DETAILED complaint as when the author was reading the letter he is presumed to have dictated to another within the Lord Chancellors Department. Furthermore that other person was/is as illiterate in English as the author of the letter. The author is also presumed to have been as DILIGENT and careful as the judge/judges he hastened to absolve of any wrong doing. Besides the unwritten Constitution of the United Kingdom could provide for THE JUDGES TO BE INDEPENDENT OF PARLIAMENT'S LAW.
Link to: Misconduct in Public Office