 JOIN |
the
Community On Line and work with others for and in the necessary challenges and exposures
for the common good. Link to Information Page |
The
visitor's attention is drawn to the words of Jesus Christ, attributed to Him by the
editors / creators of The Gospel according to St. Luke. Access His words to the lawyers
some 2000 years ago. Many the dignitaries who shared His views over the two
millennia (*Link). |
Page PERSONS - List
1. Mr. Robert Hosking LCD.
2. Judges & their function 2.
3. Haringey Police Cmndr. 3. 4. Mr G. Ebert
PROMOTES 4.
<> |
'The
Times' article below in line with submissions made by our founder in
1995 in the course of the Festival of Rights.
The submissions to the debate 'Can We Trust The Judges'
covered precisely the very issue and were welcome by those present. [*Link to the submissions] |
Below
the covers from the Festival of Rights programme.
Our founder attended the event, in 1995. Notably the organisers promoted the adage,
from classical times, whereby the written word was and remains the most powerful weapon
that man ever devised. More powerful than plutonium the slogan on the back cover declares!
|
|
|
 |
Page revised: June 20, 2012 |
| Site reconstruction for better navigation. |
VISITORS ARE URGED to access and READ THE IMPORTANT update and ADDENDA we were obliged to introduce in January 2002. We had no
choice but to REPORT THE CRIMES TO THE TREASURY; our
observations and knowledge of the constructive frauds made us accessories if we kept
quiet, like the alleged victims who work towards the implementation of the schemes by the
abductors and rapists of Justice, the Goddess; it was such a person who had been wasting
our time and securing support through many a crocodile tear. You will find the
addenda statement at the top of the Updated Pages File. We are sure that you will share
with us our concerns and most profound disappointment at and with persons who adopt and
promote activities which they know are nothing but downright crimes.
We refer to our exclusive page where we expose (as
conscientious, law abiding citizens) the Confidentiality Between
Fraudsters that exists care of the BEST OPEN SECRET.
As part of the
reconstruction process our new pages (and pages where changes and additions have been
implemented, the improved / amended pages) are endorsed with the link 'Page Changes and
the date of the last changes, at the top of the left column/margin, below the file name
(*....xxxxx.htm *). The link takes visitors to a List of the changes implemented in the
page. These include new material and links from relevant paragraphs to other or new
relevant material in the page and or in other pages. For further clarification email: webmaster@ |
| The Principle of Independence of the Judiciary abused
& misrepresented, with intent, by one and all. Yet 'the serfs' never hear of arrogant
abuse of office & the FRAUD ORGANISED THROUGH ABUSE OF THE COURTS FACILITIES, such as
Mr. Andrew Yiannides was subjected to. |
- The much revered
independence of the judiciary.
- A Judiciary that is free to ignore
the Law and the evidence lodged / presented at court. [*Link from here
to blunt endorsement of criminal activities by solicitors & barristers, all acting in
contempt of the Law on FORGERIES]
- Marvel at the capabilities of
persons, from within the Lord Chancellor's department.
- They promote assumed rights, for
judicial chair occupants, the public's servants, to breach CRIMINAL LAW,
with impunity, as Andrew Yiannides was subjected to and experienced, when the legal
circles and the police targeted him for denial to rights assured in law, national and
international. [*Link from here to copy of a blunt FORGERY that was introduced
and promoted as acceptable evidence in support of a Defence settled and filed at court by
the legal team of fraudsters]
- All intending THEIR PRACTICES, to
lead to the compensation culture, syndrome. [*Link
from here to the exclusive page where we expose
the constructively engineered DOUBLE FRAUD on the taxpayers].
- Practices, activities organised and
arrangements developed by the administrators of CIUKU Enterprises, *linked to from here establish beyond any doubt the element of
FRAUD IMPOSED THROUGH ABUSE OF THE LEGAL SYSTEM & THE COURTS FACILITIES.
- All for and in their own interests,
through abuse of public office! [*Link from here to brief legal argument on
available Law that covers 'false instruments lacking accountability by the creators /
authors of such].
- One and all, from within the Law
Enforcement Agencies, simply co-operating with one another, or serving in and for the same cause:
- The conversion of the assets of the
citizens to the organisers of CIUKU Enterprises! We have released, in our pages, Particulars & EVIDENCE
covering the participation of 'alleged victims' who
were observed and noted to have been engaging in THE DOUBLE FRAUD ON THE TAXPAYERS
OPERATIONS, [*Link from here to a typical example].
- Victim citizens, treated as serfs
of the Middle Ages by the modern days, self-appointed, 'Masters & Lords' of 'centuries
gone by'.
-
|
TWENTY-FOUR years earlier the creator of these pages and founder of
the human-rights.org (NGO), Mr Andrew Yiannides, determined that justice was just a word
and that such a service DID NOT EXIST in the United Kingdom.
He had witnessed much in the course
of High Court Proceedings. Blunt, questionable, arrogant and criminal in intent
activities, by the legal circles, over six years at the Royal Courts of Justice, were more
than enough to conclude as above stated.
It was a case of solicitors, barristers and
judges acting IN BREACH OF CRIMINAL LAW. They secured, used and promoted false instruments
inclusive of A BLUNT FORGERY in order to corrupt and pervert justice, in association with
others. And the police acting in contempt of their public duties and the law they were
meant to serve as servants of it and the public, Mr & Mrs Average, in an allegedly
civilised state / country where the rule of law rules supreme.
It was immaterial, if because of invisible
services by the TRIAD (Legal
- Judicial - Police services) to the instigator of the
original fraud (for which the institution of court
proceedings) who was simply noted to be relying on the
best the managers and organisers of CIUKU Enterprises were offering and providing to and
for criminals to benefit from.
In the process the rights of the targeted
citizen treated with the same contempt as Parliament's Laws and as the controllers of the
Law Enforcement Agencies have been arranging for centuries and millennia. [*Link from here to words
attributed to Jesus Christ by the editors, creators of the New Testament in the 4th
Century in the Common Era (Anno Domini). The fact that the editors / creators included
such elements in the New Testament PROVES that they / the sons of men were and had been
victims of similar activities and organised crimes against Mr. & Mrs. Average way back
in those days and beyond].
The revelations / mental eye openers way
back in 1969 -1975. The activities did lead to the need to research and investigate the
states imposed on the citizens in an allegedly civilised Democracy, as the media and the
politicians relentlessly were, and to these days still assert and promote in contempt of
evidence establishing otherwise. |
Published
on the right image of the page where we point to the entry in respect
of the debate when delegates and representatives of organisations who attended took part
and raised issues on "CAN THE CITIZENS TRUST THE JUDGES?"
Need for the debate and submissions from the delegates, constituted
evidence on the element of the invisible services, by the Law Enforcement Agencies, to
criminals such as Mr Andrew Yiannides noted and had been the victim of, because the
persons who were Summonsed to Court, had been benefiting from such, as of the onset as
reference to (a couple of years after issue and
service) the Summons issued
established.
In fact the Barrister retained by the legal team (representing the fraudsters) endorsed an affidavit (drafted, most probably, by the
solicitors representing the fraudsters who were Summonsed to court in order to account for
the fraudulent activities they engaged in at the expense of Mr. Andrew Yiannides), whereby a High Court Judge, was invited to deny rights assured to
the defrauded citizen. |
|
 |
Mr A. Yiannides' submissions on the above occasion, were well
received by the chair & delegates who addressed the issue; also members in the
audience. The submissions were repeated in a letter to the Rt. Hon. Paul Boateng, the
Parliamentary Spokes-person on Legal Affairs for New Labour, in opposition at the time.
Years later the submissions were reflected through the headlines, above in the margin
pane. We had no doubt at the time that the government was to be attending to the very
issue, as a matter of priority, IF JUSTICE WAS TO BE SERVED AS THE GOVERNMENT INDICATED
& PROMISED to Mr A Yiannides, in 1995, when in opposition. |
|
