Site reconstruction for better navigation. - (file:../hoffice.htm)
Page First published, February 1997 -
Revised: August 25, 2012
The Home Office
and the Home
VISITORS ARE URGED
to access and READ THE IMPORTANT update and ADDENDA we were
obliged to introduce in January 2002. We had no choice but to REPORT THE CRIMES TO THE TREASURY; our observations and
knowledge of the constructive frauds made us accessories if we kept quiet, like the
alleged victims who work towards the implementation of the schemes by the abductors and
rapists of Justice, the Goddess. It was such a person who had been wasting our time and
securing support through many a crocodile tear, like others before her. You will
find the addenda statement at the top of the Updated Pages File. We are sure that you will
share with us our concerns and most profound disappointment at and with persons who adopt
and promote activities which they know are nothing but downright crimes.
We refer and pount you to our exclusive page where we
expose (as conscientious, law abiding citizens) the
Confidentiality Between Fraudsters that exists care of the BEST OPEN SECRET, the
cornerstone upon which Crimes Incorporated UK Unlimited Enterprises, as in other
pseudo-democracies, the enterprises, we cover, thrive.
Guidelines on Navigating through the extensive
material: access instructions.
As part of the reconstruction process our new
pages (and pages where changes and additions have been implemented, the improved &
amended pages) are endorsed with the link 'Page Changes and the date of the last changes,
at the top of the left column/margin, below the file name (*....xxxxx.htm *). The link
takes visitors to a List of the changes implemented in the page. These include new
material and links from relevant paragraphs to other or new relevant material in the
page and or in other pages. For further clarification email: webmaster@
- Responsible for the security of and the
implementation of the rights in law of ALL and each citizen.
- Rights secured through Acts of Parliament and Security Guaranteed
Under International Treaties and Accords.
- Rights and Security that should be applied to by Public Servants,
as their retainers command and not as they determine through defaults, omissions and as
operating executives of CIUKU Enterprises.
- Duties and obligations under the law to be adhered to by all
other citizens, on the basic tenet that no one shall violate the rights of any other.
The attempts by New Labour's first
Lord Chancellor, Lord Irving of Lairg, to create a supper ministry WAS A DANGER TO
DEMOCRACY, especially so, when one considers that the Lord Chancellor and his Departmnet
have always been in charge of persons who are of the opinion that they were appointed, by
'their God' to be the modern 'Lords and Masters' of the serfs, in this one's great nation.
We are in no doubt that such is the case in other
lands, too. So long as our judges are free and shall remain free to
indulge and practice their corrupted law, unsupervised, unchecked, uncontrolled and
acting, as they please, in breach of the laws of our Parliament and in violation of human
rights, Democracy is in mortal danger.
The days of public servants relying on the
BLIND DEAF AND DUMB MEDIA ARE OVER. The days when ALL relied on
BLIND DEAF AND DUMB officers within the law enforcement agencies are also over. This is
the age of FREE exchange of information and THE unadulterated FACTS OF LIFE within all
states, so long as their citizens are free to exercise AS WE DO, their basic human-rights
which ARE GUARANTEED under the European Convention
on Human Rights. (ECoHR)
Article 6.1. "In
the determination of his civil rights and or
of any criminal charges against him, EVERYONE is entitled to a fair and public hearing
within a reasonable time by an independent and impartial tribunal .... judgement shall be
pronounced publicly but the press and public may be excluded from all or part
of the trial (hearing) in the interest of morals, public order or national security in a
democratic society ...interests of juveniles... protection of the private life of the
parties... where publicity would prejudice the interests of justice." and under
Article 6.2. "EVERYONE
charged with a criminal offence shall be presumed innocent until proven guilty according
to law." and under
Article 6.3. "EVERYONE.....
has the following minimum rights (a)
to be informed promptly.... in
detail ... nature and cause of charges against him .... (b) adequate
time,... facilities.. to prepare his defence.... (c) to defend himself in person or through legal
assistance of his own choosing free legal assistance in the interests of justice if he has
not sufficient means to pay... (d) to examine of have examined witnesses against him ..to obtain
attendance and examination of witnesses on his behalf under the same conditions as
witnesses against him; and (e) to
have the free assistance of an interpreter if he cannot understand or speak the language
use in court."
Article 8.1. "EVERYONE has the right to respect for his private and family
life, his home and his correspondence.
"THERE SHALL BE NO interference by a public authority with the exercise of this
right ..except in accordance with the law .. necessary in a democratic society..
interests of national security... public safety... economic well being of the country...
the prevention of disorder or crime... the protection of health or morals or for the
protection of the rights and freedoms of others." This is the most abused and breached piece of legislation by the
organisers and managers of the CIUKU Enterprises:-
To the well known
quote by Abraham Lincoln we add, for the benefit of the abductors of Justice and
Democracy, our founder's 'addenda', the fourth, dimension below:
- Our Masters and Lords seek to, and impose
many a criminal act.
- They do so through breaches of national law.
- By relying upon, and using the 'subordinates
created by the state'.
- Those subordinates, as Public Servants,
are also independent of the law - criminals'.
- They are assured, by the controllers of it
all, that 'No prosecutions are ever likely to be instigated, against them'.
- Just AS IN THE NATIONAL SCANDAL
scenarios.Forgeries used for the theft of funds belonging to third parties with plenty of
FALSE INSTRUMENTS that lack accountability, as issued by persons in judicial office.
- Officers of Law bluntly endorsing and
promoting the criminal activities of public servants.
- Collectrively acting in contempt of the law
as authorised and licensed, by our representatives in government, to act so, for the
implementation of CRIMES INTENDED thus LEADING TO THE NEW CODE OF MORALS, hatched up in
secret sessions by the abductors of Democracy, attended
by the MEDIA barons and their editors.
- The theft and misappropriation of Housing
- Criminal activities in pursuit of organised
multiple frauds on the public at large.
- Forgeries used and no prosecutions because
of the plan to create a melting pot.
- All through arrogant interference in the
affairs of other countries.
- Criminals who steal from their masters (the
citizens / taxpayers).
- Public SERVANTS indulging in blunt crime at
the expense of their employers.
- And they dare determine how other countries
and nations should run their own societies and affairs.
- Our Lords and Masters wishing to play
Godfather to the world.
- They are not simply interfering in other
- As part of their master plan, THEY ARE
BREAKING UP FAMILIES THROUGH ORGANISED FRAUDULENT ACTIVITIES in their own countries.
- Plenty of breaches of national law and gross
violations of international treaties and accords.
- Criminal activities by the very guardians of
'the Law', OUR SERVANTS, who are retained by our 'elected, through frauds,'
representatives in government.
- OUR AGENTS acting and operating in
government and states, which they misrepresent as alleged Democracies that, allegedly,
rest and are founded on law and order, as ABSOLUTE DICTATORS in contempt of all law.
- They do it all through the media barons and
their stooges, with plenty of theatre.
- "You can fool all of the people for
some of the time".
- "You can fool some of the people
for all of the time".
- "You cannot fool all of the people,
all of the time".
- We add "AND there are some
people YOU can never fool at any time".
Article 9. "EVERYONE has the right to freedom of thought, conscience
Article 10. "EVERYONE has the right to FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION.... to HOLD
OPINIONS...TO RECEIVE AND IMPART INFORMATION AND IDEAS without interference by public
authority and regardless of frontiers..... (with provisions attached to ) maintaining the
authority AND IMPARTIALITY of the judiciary".
Article 11. "EVERYONE
has the right of freedom of peaceful assembly and to freedom of ASSOCIATION with
others.... rights to form and join ... for the protection of HIS INTERESTS".
Article 13. "EVERYONE
whose rights and freedoms as set forth in this Convention are violated SHALL have an
effective remedy before a national authority notwithstanding that the violation HAS BEEN
committed by persons acting in an OFFICIAL CAPACITY."
Article 13 is VERY CLEAR. WHERE IS THE NATIONAL AUTHORITY
THAT LOOKS INTO THE VIOLATIONS judges in the United Kingdom endorse, entertain AND
INSTIGATE of their own? The question is simple and the Lord Chancellor with
the Home Secretary should co-operate and produce the formula under which the citizens CAN
challenge activities that blatantly breach national law and VIOLATE Human Rights.
Converting the properties of others to alleged legal costs attached to fraudulent court
proceedings is the worst anathema the United Kingdom is plagued with. One could not expect
a clearer and more succinct a situation of abuses of court 'facilities' than in the
Geoffrey Harold Scriven cases. WE have other cases on file. Where is the authority to
investigate and prosecute the offenders?
Article 14. "The enjoyment of the rights and freedoms set
forth in this Convention shall be secured without discrimination on any grounds such as
sex, race, colour, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social
origin, association with a national minority, property, birth or other status."
Below in HTML for links to and from
THE FULL TEXT OF THE EXPLICIT LETTER to the Rt. Hon. Frank Field MP
29th April 2003
The Rt. Hon. Frank Field MP
House of Commons
London - SW1A 0AA
My Ref: A03EATTP
Your Ref: ‘Think /Do the unthinkable’ brief.
Re: Human Rights and the duties of Ministers / MPs in a Democratic State
I beg to refer you to:
- My letter of 18th December 1998, published originally in the public domain
The above letter was posted to the Rt. Hon. Jack Straw, Home Secretary
at the time. On that occasion it was noted that the government acted promptly.
- The stated facts of life, relative to our pseudo-democracy, as covered in our pages, are
clear. The realities and realisations to the point. Included, in the stated facts,
references to letters that I was caused to send, to you, in connection with the rampant
fraud and corruption covered in our pages. The Free-For-All organised, always, by
Public(!) Servants(?). Crimes seen to be endorsed and acquiesced, through blunt
defaults from and by other public(!) Servants(?). The latter retained and maintained by
other Public(!) Servants(?) to serve the citizens by applying their presumed knowledge of
law to the facts known or stated to them and or raised with / brought to the attention of
such Public(!) Servants(?).
The references to the letters that were sent to you can be accessed in
the same page/web-site file at:
I will appreciate an acknowledgement to this letter, by return post. A
response proper, as soon as possible, is deemed essential because of the serious issues
that my enquiries, now, and the matters that my communications, past and present, raised
and raise with you. Indeed, others in public office, during, before and after my original
submissions to you, personally, received substantial information and documented evidence
in support of my submissions.
Please note that as part of the preparations for the publication of the
facts of life, in the public domain, and the raising of the issues of ‘who are
responsible for the rampant fraud and corruption through contempt of all law, as Public(!)
Servants(?) indulge’, an explicit practice and ploy is pointed to by me, in the
pages published by and at *human-rights*.
In respect of other facts, realities and convenient arrangements
(pointed to by me at *human-rights*) I wish to enquire of you, if you are aware or
were informed of the fact that the victims of the ‘Arms to, and for, Iraq’ fiasco:
including the costly theatrical productions (court presentations), the torment and torture
(through the court proceedings / charges / allegations) imposed on the victims of
Public(!) Servants(?) received compensation, not long ago, running into millions of pounds
sterling? ALL AT THE REXPENSE OF THE PUBLIC PURSE – the taxpayer : Mr & Mrs Average!
The succinct and explicit realities covered in the page:
and the fundamental realities / practices covered in the other explicit
(URL points to new website)
led to the submissions last year to:
- The Treasury
- The Prime Minister
- The Home Secretary
And the submissions are covered at:
I am preparing for the release and publication, in the public domain,
of the acknowledgement by the government in waiting in 1995, relative to THE SERIOUS ISSUE
OF FRAUD IN THE LEGAL SYSTEM. I feel it my duty to draw your attention to the aforesaid
facts. You were acting for the government you represent, at the time of my submissions to
you. It is, therefore, incumbent upon me to enquire of you and to seek assistance, from a
Minister who was caused to resign, in order that I may present a clearer picture on the
issue of the melting pot. The criminal activities, by persons who ‘arrange world events’
through secret meetings and undeclared by government policies, lead to the citizens being
defrauded of their properties and their rights in law. The activities also lead to the
taxing of Mr & Mrs Average for the experiments in social restructuring by non-elected
‘criminally motivated / trained / tutored’ individuals, who abuse public office.
I need only remind you that the victims of such public(!) servants(?)
have families and offsprings to care for. The citizens also have the inalienable right to
plan for their futures and those of their children. The criminal activities that we cover
in our pages, endorsed and acquiesced, as these are through the courts, amount to nothing
short of ‘crimes against humanity’. When an elected government turns a blind eye and
or ears to the evidence that no one can shove in his/her private or family closets, nor
shove it all under the carpets of the salons that the offending public(!) servants(?)
frequent, the issue of:
WHEN WILL THE GOVERNMENT that made promises in 1995 put an end to
the abuse / use of the courts for the imposition of ‘the creeping dictatorship’,
that I recognised as long ago as 1972/1975? The background and the evidence to/for the
conclusions, then, is published at:
The false instrument published in the page, was made even falser after
the criminals ‘goofed’. It was created / procured years after the events that led to
the institution of court proceedings. The architects (legal circles) with the defaulting
public(!) servants(?), (the police and judicial chair abusers) established beyond any
doubt the rampant fraud and corruption through the courts. The Lords & Masters
mentalities towards the citizens (‘subjects’ to the whims of the corrupters of
societies) whom the offending public(!) servants(?) treat as serfs of the Middle Ages, was
also born out of those events. I draw your personal attention to the fact that Lord
Jeffrey Archer ended up behind bars while the architect and promoter of a false instrument
FOR THE PERVERSION & CORRUPTION OF JUSTICE was rewarded with silk and subsequently
appointed to ‘judicial chair occupancy’. With criminals in judicial chairs how can any
government that knows of or becomes aware of ‘the facilities at / through the courts for
RAMPANT FRAUD AND CRIMES ENDORSED BY THE LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES justify or assert ‘government
founded and resting on law and order’?
Your response proper on the issue of the submissions that were ignored
by your office / private staff (you?) are deemed essential. In the event that some
subordinate or junior may be presumed responsible for suppression of my letters to you, I
request that you access the page:
There, the questions (in red): "WHO
governs ? And How ?"
Also: Is the answer "Through Juniors and dereliction of Public
Founder / President
December 1998, Letter to the Home Secretary
18 December 1998
The Rt. Hon. Jack Straw
House of Commons Westminster London SW1 0AA
Our Ref. 18DTRPAP
Your Ref. The Influx of Refugees
Proof of Posting secured
Re: Press release Friday 18 December 1998
We attach hereto copies of letter delivered to:-
- The chief Executive at Haringey Council
- The MD at Diamond Lettings - managing agents for a property let to a refugee family
- Copy of a letter we sent to D Jones, reporter, whose explicit article was published by
the Daily Mail.
- THREE copies of the FORGERIES referred to in the copies of the communications we attach
- Copy of part of an appeal to a co-operating in the scams County Court evincing a
challenge of all in respect of the last tier (qualified below) in respect of the amount
(rent) allegedly received by way of Housing Benefit as was remitted (occasionally) to the
victim of all parties in the conspiracy to cause damages, the property owner. The
challenge is clear "IF the property owner was to receive only the amount the council
staff were aware of WHY WAS THE D.S.S not informed to remit only that amount for the
property ? IS OFFICIALLY APPROVED FRAUD on the D.S.S budget part of the scams ? We need
only add that copy of the serious issue (question-challenge was sent to Quary House -
D.S.S fraud investigation Dpt. Leeds. We did not merit an acknowledgement? WHY ?
You will duly note that in our letter to the MD at Diamond Lettings we
refer to various articles that appeared in the Daily Mail (in the meantime we had been
bombarding them with evidence as to HOW the refugees are USED by rogue lettings agents AND
COUNCIL staff and officers; presumably for personal reasons and or in accordance with
corrupt council policies (abuse of the facilities at their disposal) care of Central
Government without adequate checks and or TRULY independent supervision. 'Corrupt Britain'
trumpeted Paul Johnson, in the Daily Mail on 6th November 1998. That could well
be an understatement IF NO ACTION IS TAKEN NOW in respect of the Housing Benefit Social
Security frauds operated by councils such as Haringey if not through policy by their
staff, who abuse their public office and positions. The magnitude of the situation
commands a S.F.O and or Public Auditor's office investigation URGENTLY.
We submitted to the Rt. Hon. Frank Field our findings in respect of the
scams operated freely by council staff. Such at the expense of the private landlords who
suffer as stated in the two attached letter copies. An explicit and succinct resume of the
methods and the tactics used by all (council staff and letting agents with co-operating
tenants as in the present case) was submitted to Max Clifford and Associates for possible
use and investigative interest by any decent editor in the United Kingdom. However, as
Diogenes stated in ancient Greece when asked why he was walking about the streets of
Athens with a lit lantern in broad daylight, "I am Looking for a huMAN (?????p?),
implying that all were animals. OUR newspapers are only interested in and report on
multiple pregnancies AND the fact that an under age (14 year old girl) WAS IMPREGNATED by
a 12 year old boy. Interestingly HER PARENTS (on social security) announced THEY WOULD BE
HAPPY to raise their grandchild up, at the expense of the revenue providers, the decent
citizens who are being called upon to be more productive and competitive in industry in
order to maintain the amoral society all promote relentlessly from within the media. The
deceptions and malaise, such as the abused properties let to the refugees ALL USE for
their own ultimate goals; (how many and who else behind the scams and frauds on the
victims?). Millions fleeced from the D.S.S budget through the tier system we refer to.
Needless to say we have sent evidence of a three tier operating system
in respect of claims lodged with Social Security by benefits agencies (such as Haringey
Council - a local authority).
- One amount is claimed from the D.S.S. (as authorised / approved by the conveniently
independent Rent Officers who nevertheless ARE ON THE PAYROLL of the Local Authorities.
- Another amount is quoted to the co-operating in the scams letting agents and
- Another amount is then quoted to the owner of the property by the Letting agent who is
provided with computer printouts to that effect, as and when the need arises.
In the case of the THREE forgeries (attached) ALL evince the very same
photographic image of a signature. IT IS FOR YOUR OFFICE and those the Home Office
retains, approves and or appoints to hold the esteemed (and questioned of recent) office
of INVESTIGATING OFFICERS OF LAW to ORDER and conduct an investigation proper, set in
motion in order that the truth may be known.
- Who introduced the original and only FORGERY in existence for months, in order to
justify release of thousands of pounds worth of rents due and payable for and in respect
of occupation of the property of our member (a private landlord) to the tenants ?
- Who responsible for introducing another TWO forgeries months later? From within the
local authority's confines and delivered all three to the co-operating in the scam letting
agents who then sat on the FORGERIES and suppressed them from us and the property owner
for months !!!!
Sir, it is one thing to allege being an innocent, incapable and or
incompetent person to deal or handle such criminal activities and FAIL at the same time to
refer such criminal acts to the police. We need not point out that the use of forgeries in
order to secure release of funds which later may be alleged as 'misappropriated by a
'moved on and or disappeared tenant (trained/instructed and USED actor - REFUGEE) are the
basis of activities that generate CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUD on the victims.
We trust that your office will:
- Acknowledge this letter as a matter of courtesy. As an honourable member of the present
government, who kept his promises to the Lawrence family and did not wish for a blanket
over the news reports in respect of the mistake of your young son, we know that you WILL
ACT as announced in the press in order to cease the free for all many from within latch on
- Forward the attached documents to the Commissioner of the Metropolitan Police and or the
officer now investigating bribes and corruption in high places considering that abuse of
County Court facilities is fully documented and none has any defence in the operations of
the scam, especially when the encouraged, goaded and instructed actor/tenant refugee IS
PROMISED and was looking forward to the additional abuse of the Legal Aid facilities. SIR
we can do without such imports; we have to look after own first. The elderly and the sick,
those who offered their services and helped create through hard work and commitment. We
need no imported scroungers safe the genuinely distressed, not those who are promised milk
and honey and RIGHTS at our expense when the rights of the indigenous population and our
own citizens are VIOLATED by persons who ought to know of SUCH law as well as their
alleged obligations to provide for the poor refugees ABUSED for other ulterior goals and
Sir, we conclude by informing you that we have conceived of a system
that could cut down on the Housing Fraud scams using existing law without violating
anybody's rights. Such practices as we have uncovered and have come to recognise as
ILLEGAL and CRIMINAL ACTS can be minimised and or terminated quickly IF the Government so
wishes. That much was related to the Rt. Hon. Frank Field when he was charged by our Prime
Minister to think and do the unthinkable. OUR simple scheme and system WILL reduce the
Housing Benefit frauds, but only if the Government so wishes and public bodies are
instructed to co-operate; it is time for the monopoly that grants public servants
opportunities to act outside the LAW and corruptly is dealt with (quietly). The monopoly
of the corrupt/corruptible has to cease IF we are to recover as a strong economy and waste
(through FRAUD) IS no more (at least reduced from within one well known area. The DO it.
Don't worry we can also get you Legal Aid, THE constructive frauds on the Social Security
Andrew Yiannides NDD., ACFI. ATI.
Landlords Action Group
65 Abbott's Park Road
London E10 6HU
ENCL. As text
READ BELOW the article that was published within days in
the London Evening Standard.
- Consider our submissions above to the MP, Frank Field Esq. ex-Minister who had
been caused to resign years ago.
- The first letter we pointed to above should also be read by ALL who access this
- Every considerate human (thinking and feeling animal) should then consider WHERE
BE THE DELIVERY OF JUSTICE to the British people, the taxpayers as we have been demanding
- Can any housewife who does not keep a clean home, ever really assert or assume
the right 'to clean up another's home'?.
FOOD FOR THOUGHT, dear Members of Parliament. Cease all manifestation inherent
in puppets and act as the representatives of the citizens and not as the mainpulated
'slaves of the operators who organise and control CIUKU Enterprises.
Monday, 12 May 2003 Page 11
The Home Secretary
has irked the judiciary by seeking stricter sentences
for murder. Here he
insists that courts must take more notice of the public
By David Blunkett
MY announcement of new
sentences for murders – so that life means life – provoked the latest wave of media
coverage on my so-called war on the judges". I can see why. It is easy to caricature
any disagreement as the hot-tempered working-class Sheffield boy taking on an icy-cool
retired judge pontificating from his Surrey drawing room.
Yet I am not "at war" with judges, barristers or the
rest of the legal profession. I believe strongly in a politically independent judiciary,
the rule of law and due process. But I also believe in Parliament and a healthy democracy
where people vote in elections because their vote can make a difference to the world they
live in, through the politicians they elect. Surely it is possible to have a strong and
lively debate about how Parliament and the judiciary fit together without it always being
portrayed as a brawling slanging match?
This is not some dry debate in Westminster. Confidence in our
criminal justice system is at an all-time low. Public respect for judges, politicians and
lawyers alike is equally low. Up and down the country the experience of victims and
witnesses is too often a poor one where they are treated as bit-players in a system which
sees process as being more important than justice, where technicalities are more important
than the truth.
When politicians make these points we are not seeking to wind up
the legal profession for the sake of it. We are doing our job and speaking up for the
public we serve. There are no newspaper editors, columnists or opinion formers living in
my inner-city Sheffield constituency. If I don't speak about the experiences of my
constituents and millions like them, they have no voice at all in the public arena.
I WANT to improve this situation and to get reform in the
criminal justice system that brings the legal profession with us. To do this, we need a
long hard look at the constitutional relationship between Parliament and the judges and be
clear how it has changed.
This relationship has changed beyond all recognition over the
past 30 years, thanks to the use of judicial review - the process by which an individual
can ask the court to overturn the effect or implementation of a law on their individual
circumstance. Judges now routinely use judicial review to rewrite the effects of a law
that Parliament has passed.
This isn't just my view, it is endorsed by some of the most
distinguished legal minds in the country. Professor Sir William Wade - the author of
Administrative Law – has written: "The judges have established judicial review as
an almost boundless jurisdiction over almost every kind of governmental activity".
Lord Beloff QC has said that the activities of the judiciary have infringed the
sovereignty of Parliament".
Lord Beloff also points out that in the 1950s, judicial review
was confined to fewer than 100 cases a year relating to maladministration of government.
Now, there are thousands of cases every year in every field of
commerce; construction, aviation, and IT, all inviting lawyers and judges to find ever
more ingenious ways of getting what they want from the law Parliament has passed.
Added to this have been a rash of high-profile cases brought
under the 1998 Human Rights Act which incorporated the European Convention on Human Rights
into British law.
I believe most of these cases would have ended up in Strasbourg
anyway, if we had not taken the step of building the ECHR into our legal system. But it
has undoubtedly encouraged some in the legal profession to see a further way of rendering
ineffective laws they don't like.
In my area, the impact of judicial review has been most visible
in several high profile asylum cases on fast-track claims at the Oakington centre and cash
payments for late claimants.
In both cases, the Home Office eventually won the legal
arguments but not before a major tussle which resulted in plenty of premature headlines
about our reforms being squashed.
These perceptions are vital to the health of our democracy. If
people believe that Parliament has no power or influence and that whatever promises we
make will eventually fail, how can we persuade people to vote, stand for elections and be
involved in democracy?
People have to believe that Parliament genuinely speaks for them
if they are to vote, and this can't be done if large parts of the legal system believe
that it can seek to undo Acts of Parliament without any consequences for the health of our
This is not the same as saying that public opinion, however raw,
should become law which is the way some commentators have interpreted my murder sentencing
principles. Parliament's lawmaking process is usually a year of intense deliberation over
finely worded, complicated pieces of legislation. This is the job of work which MPs and
peers do, day in, day out.
We have to move away from a stand-off mentality in which parts
of the legal profession respond to politicians with a "what's it to do with
you?" attitude. I honestly believe that most lawyers and judges do want to see
justice, not just procedural Pyrrhic victories.
I want that, too, as well as a system where judges can interpret
the laws which have been clearly set out by a democratically elected Parliament.
AT the moment, we all too often have the worst of all worlds in
which Parliament deliberates for months over laws which are then systematically undermined
by overly aggressive judicial review decisions. There is a way forward here. The legal
profession must embrace reform of the criminal justice system, not carp from the
sidelines. Like most people, I respond better to an honest dialogue than to being shouted
A better relationship between the judges, barristers and
politicians has to recognise our mandate as public representatives and not treat public
opinion as something inherently disdainful which has no role in the formulation of law.
We all have to pause and draw breath at the scale and scope of
judicial review and interpretations of the Human Rights Act if we are not to have spat
after spat about the consequences.
A mature, clear legal system is one of the foundations of a democratic
society. We all have a responsibility not to destroy the ground all of us want to stand
We have to move away
from a stand-off mentality in which parts of the legal profession respond to
politicians with `What's it to do with you?'
Ó Associated Newspapers UK
London Evening Standard – May 2003
FOOTNOTE common to most
web-pages at this website
MOST IMPORTANT In October 2010, the coalition Government's
Attorney General, in an interview published by 'COUNSEL' the monthly legal banter
magazine, specifically spoke of the police distancing themselves from cases of (small-fry)
fraud and he asserted that he was making that element his
*Link from here
to the evidence, to the images of the published article.
IT REMAINS TO BE SEEN, WHAT the coalition of the
Con-LibDems, THE GOVERNMENT OF THE DAY WILL IN FACT ATTEND TO THE RAMPANT FRAUD, and IF
IT WILL DEAL with the criminals who abuse public office, especially when faced
with appropriate submissions and claims that will be delivered in due course.
Visitors/readers are urged to read the article published in the London Evening Standard,
as settled by the Rt. Hon. David Blunkett, Home Secretary in 2003
|*Link from here
to the article we reproduce in another webpage and consider "Why tolerate the arrogance of the legal circles who had
and have the audacity to assert to the lawmakers that they, the lawmakers have nothing to
do with the law"?
While there, above it, the explicit letter to
ex-Minister, the Rt. Hon. Frank Field MP, delivered a few days earlier. ALL alleged
victim-challengers who contacted Andrew Yiannides, by the time the letter was sent to the
Minister, received copy of the letter just as they received copies of other letters
submitted to government maintained Ministers and other official appointees to public
office. Accessing the material pointed to from the letter (URLs) is of utmost importance.
It should assist 'recognition of the citizen's rights at work', when called upon properly
in truly democratic states. The above in 2003; there were other 'submissions' and among
such civilised and, within the law, approaches by citizens that led to the right actions
by governments, the explicit challenges when we set about exposing one of the most evil of
alleged victims of the legal circles to have ever contacted us.
*Link to our explicit submissions to (a) the Prime Minister, (b) the Chancellor / Treasury, (c) the Home Secretary. We
acted so after we had secured more than enough evidence about the parts of an alleged
victim whose only interests were (i)
the rewards under the table FOR KEEPING QUIET about the ORGANISED FRAUD THROUGH ABUSE
OF THE COURTS' FACILITIES and (ii) her
parts in blunt attempts that were intended to discredit the person she was sent along to
mess about with, Mr Andrew Yiannides.
|Access please the letter to the Home Secretary, the Rt. Hon. Jack Straw,
in December 1998
*Link from here
to the letter
& note the results
evinced in the newspaper article (Hornsey Journal) also within days of the letter reaching
its destination. Many the charlatans and stooges -lovers and 'promoters of the system as is'- on the job for
decades; one and all acting as sold souls always do
*Link from here
to the evidence we point to relative to the parts of one of a number of sold to the system
fraudsters who were sent along / introduced to Andrew Yiannides by the managers /
organisers of the LIPS crowd / mob..
Links to: the Declaration Citizens Rights - Assured in Law OUR AIMS (Statement of Intent)
Links to: The
G H Screen HomePage Confidentiality
Between Fraudsters - FACTS
ACCESS: http://www.justice-uk.human-rights.org (For an important message at this Community on Line web-site)
(A judge instigates the Fraud On Tax Payers - he knows not the difference
between 'imposed' and 'no undue influence' by solicitor.)