h-rtitle.gif (7604 bytes)

Crime - Organised - Institutionalised - Corruption - Fraud - Protection Rackets, run and managed by judicial chair occupants, in a free-for-all state of abundance. Note below the arrangements between the administrative, the judiciary and the media; read of the all-embracing guarantee in place, in contempt of all law : the root shall be pointed to.

WHERE IS JUSTICE? Read below:-

"The court has inherent jurisdiction to stay an action which must fail; as, for instance an action brought in respect of an act of State"

*Link from here to founder's tribulations in 1972-75 and marvel at the creativity of allegedly honourable officers of Justice and the Law in the mother of all PSEUDOdemocracies

  • And by extension any act of any public servant who is appointed, retained and maintained by other public servants for all of whom, the state, as employer, is ultimately responsible, including abusers of judicial chair occupancy. Hence, the billions paid out as covered in the affidavit which visitors can link to directly from here [*Link].
  • Link also from here to the founder's conclusions as of 1972-75 when the great Metropolitan police were seen to be nothing but accessories to and abettors of the rampant fraud and corruption through the courts organised and processed to fruition while Members of Parliament were -as they still do- promoting the waffle that amounts to nothing short of:-

'independence of the judiciary to act in contempt of ALL LAW (national and international) in a pseudo-democracy.

*Link from here to proof of the parts the police play in promotion and expansion of the criminal activities instigated, processed and imposed on society by the legal circles. Read of assertions by a typical hypocrite, none other than the Commissioner of the Metropolitan Police, Sir Robert Mark QPM, when he spoke of FALSE RECORDS / FORGERIES by the legal circles while delivering his famous Dimbleby Lecture on BBC-TV in November 1973, 15 months after he received true copy of THE FORGERY advanced and promoted by the licensed criminals : solicitors and barristers for their evil ends in the case that opened Andrew Yiannides' mental eyes to the realities of life in the United Kingdom, a typical PSEUDOdemocracy. Can anyone enlighten Andrew and the millions of victims of the legal circles WHY NO PROSECUTION of the solicitors & the barristers in 1972 or thereafter?.

  • With such a facility in place (the words we point to above) and arrogant abuse of public office, can anyone assert, or argue, that Mr Andrew Yiannides, the founder of human-rights, was not right to determine that Justice has been abducted and that she is held captive in the dungeons maintained by her abductors who rape her daily in their courts? (>Hence the c reation of www.jusaticeraped.org <)
  • ALL Member States of the European Union are subject to the ruling which visitors, readers and researchers can access in the explicit page /yourrights.htm

*Link from here to the realities - in due course also a link to the warning (indirect but nonetheless very clear) for thinkers to recognise 

  • On 3rd March 2008 >someone's birthday< we released a House of Lords PRECEDENT CASE and reveal deliberations by their Lordships in respect of FRAUD - DECEPTION - CONSPIRACY & IMPLIED LIES BY KEEPING SILENT about any wrong imposed on any other.
  • >>> IN THE MEANTIME we have been naming and shaming a number who know of and engage in much more than just approve wrongs imposed on Mr & Mrs Average, the millions of taxpayers, in our allegedly civilised country / state / province / district of the European Union created by politicians, without reference to the taxed for fraud sucker-serfs, allegedly for the benefit of the citizens from FRAUD & CORRUPTION, among other promotions.

Needless to say the case entailed activities and practices by solicitors as Mr Andrew Yiannides was subjected to, decades later, by an old school friend, Mr Kypros Nichola of Nicholas & Co. in London. Mr K. Nichola bluntly abused the trust placed in him and indulged, in tandem with others, in criminal activities intended to cause the damages that were imposed on the targeted 'serf' by accredited - by the Law Society & Bar Council - allegedly Honourable Officers of the Supreme Court, the courts maintained by successive elected governments in the United Kingdom, one of many pseudodemocracies. In due course another revelation relevant to the arrogant 'inherent jurisdiction', through which to deny, obstruct justice & impose all manner of criminally created states on 'the serfs', who are taxed for the cost of maintaining criminals in public office, in pseudo-democracies.

RESPONSIBLE FOR THE STATE OF AFFAIRS, successive irresponsible Lord Chancellors and Home Secretaries who ignored and ignore all complaints and submissions by victims of the organised crimes we point to and expose in our pages, irrespective of the evidence and the law pointed to, by the victims of it all, the citizens who are called upon to pay taxes for the maintenance of criminals in public office.

[*Link from here to our exclusive page, covering confidential fraud as arranged THROUGH THE BEST KEPT OPEN SECRET in alleged democracies, European States. Elsewhere the foundations and corner stone upon which the operatives built the societies of their making using the bricks and mortar we cover in this and other pages. The visitor should not be under any illusion that the stars in the theatrical productions, covered in our pages were by any stretch of the imagination 'humans' who were / are gifted with any attributes that distinguish 'true humans' (>thinkers<) from animals.

Fraud in court  Council staff use Forgeries   Misconduct in Public Office. 2 cases relative to applicable law One Protocol says it ALL It betrays arrogant intentions Law Provides for THEFTS and it covers Judges too Judges' duties   TIME 4 CHANGE   & CHALLENGES Site CONTENTS - Table of Contents & ongoing work Your Rights & OBLIGATIONS to Society SITE SEARCH facility for any specific element / issue of concern to visitors / readers
COURTS : their Facilities Abused For ORGANISED CRIME : FRAUD Solicitor's Perjury & Victim Ignores it all Just like the Law Society always does Blackmailed or is it Just Conditioned & Subjugated Victims who join the club ? We name Lovers of blunt fraud through courts - Users of the facilities 4 illicit gains Local Authorities & FRAUD on 'serfs' the Taxpayers who are kept in the dark Police Party to & Endorsing Criminal Acts, Activities Arrogant Fraud FALSE Records & Contempt of Law by the legal Circles & Public Services The crafty ones & Vexatious Litigant PLOYS for the rewarded silent

* Information FOR victims who wish to co-operate by EXPOSING & CHALLENGING abusers of Public Office *

family.uk-human-rights justiceraped.org dssfraud.htm confraud.htm dadscare.htm contract.htm converts.htm MensAid
solicitorsfromhell.co.uk chancellor.htm theyknow.htm solfraud.htm sheknows.htm 4deceit.htm convicti.htm forward.htm


*Link from here to evidence. *Link also from here to a case when the abusers of the courts' facilities abandoned their plans for another targeted family

IMPORTANT INFORMATION for all victims of malpractice - misconduct - negligence, etc. TO NOTE

In the civil justice system in England and Wales, a judge presides over the proceedings that are argued by the opposing sides through the adversarial process. The process enables the court, judge, to reach a conclusion as to the truth of the facts in dispute. Thereat it is for the judge to apply the law to the facts proven, established at court.

The system as evolved is covered in the page 'English Legal System' and remains the same after the Woolf reforms.

An explicit Affidavit [*L] plus exhibits and
     letters to a Chief Inspector of Police
          one to solicitors
[*L] and another to the Lord Chancellor [*L] evince
               ORGANISED CRIMES
(Access and read the letter to the police in September 2006 [*L])

Access & read from one of a number of letters to the Prime Minister : * I believe that New Labour will deliver us from the wrongs we have been suffering for far too long. Use of our resources in terms of human potential and capabilities can and should be channelled through rights not wrongs, through positives not through negatives. It is our produce and ingenuity we can sell to others not the minefields of corrupt and bankrupt public services. * [*Link from here to the page, note the steps taken to ensure the Prime Minister forwarded / delegated submissions and evidence received at 10 Downing Street to the right Minister / Ministry because the submissions were in respect of ORGANISED CRIMES

3rd March 2011 added link [*L] to the BBC-TV Dimbleby Lecture in 1973 as the Metropolitan Police Commissioner, Sir Robert Mark prepared & presented to the sucker-serfs


Site reconstruction for better navigation. - (file:../hoffice.htm)

Page First published, February 1997 - Revised: August 25, 2012

The Home Office

and the Home Secretary

VISITORS ARE URGED to access and READ THE IMPORTANT update and ADDENDA we were obliged to introduce in January 2002. We had no choice but to REPORT THE CRIMES TO THE TREASURY; our observations and knowledge of the constructive frauds made us accessories if we kept quiet, like the alleged victims who work towards the implementation of the schemes by the abductors and rapists of Justice, the Goddess. It was such a person who had been wasting our time and securing support through many a crocodile tear, like others before her.  You will find the addenda statement at the top of the Updated Pages File. We are sure that you will share with us our concerns and most profound disappointment at and with persons who adopt and promote activities which they know are nothing but downright crimes. We refer and pount you to our exclusive page where we expose (as conscientious, law abiding citizens) the Confidentiality Between Fraudsters that exists care of the BEST OPEN SECRET, the cornerstone upon which Crimes Incorporated UK Unlimited Enterprises, as in other pseudo-democracies, the enterprises, we cover, thrive. 

Guidelines on Navigating through the extensive material: access instructions.  

As part of the reconstruction process our new pages (and pages where changes and additions have been implemented, the improved & amended pages) are endorsed with the link 'Page Changes and the date of the last changes, at the top of the left column/margin, below the file name (*....xxxxx.htm *). The link takes visitors to a List of the changes implemented in the page. These include new material and links from relevant paragraphs to other or new relevant material in the page and or in other pages. For further clarification email: webmaster@

  • Responsible for the security of and the implementation of the rights in law of ALL and each citizen.
  • Rights secured through Acts of Parliament and Security Guaranteed Under International Treaties and Accords.
  • Rights and Security that should be applied to by Public Servants, as their retainers command and not as they determine through defaults, omissions and as operating executives of CIUKU Enterprises.
  • Duties and obligations under the law to be adhered to by all other citizens, on the basic tenet that no one shall violate the rights of any other.

The attempts by New Labour's first Lord Chancellor, Lord Irving of Lairg, to create a supper ministry WAS A DANGER TO DEMOCRACY, especially so, when one considers that the Lord Chancellor and his Departmnet have always been in charge of persons who are of the opinion that they were appointed, by 'their God' to be the modern 'Lords and Masters' of the serfs, in this one's great nation.

We are in no doubt that such is the case in other lands, too. So long as our judges are free and shall remain free to indulge and practice their corrupted law, unsupervised, unchecked, uncontrolled and acting, as they please, in breach of the laws of our Parliament and in violation of human rights, Democracy is in mortal danger.

The days of public servants relying on the BLIND DEAF AND DUMB MEDIA ARE OVER. The days when ALL relied on BLIND DEAF AND DUMB officers within the law enforcement agencies are also over. This is the age of FREE exchange of information and THE unadulterated FACTS OF LIFE within all states, so long as their citizens are free to exercise AS WE DO, their basic human-rights which ARE GUARANTEED under the European Convention on Human Rights. (ECoHR

Article 6.1.  "In the determination of his civil rights and obligations or of any criminal charges against him, EVERYONE is entitled to a fair and public hearing within a reasonable time by an independent and impartial tribunal .... judgement shall be pronounced publicly but the press and public may be excluded from all or part of the trial (hearing) in the interest of morals, public order or national security in a democratic society ...interests of juveniles... protection of the private life of the parties... where publicity would prejudice the interests of justice." and under

Article 6.2.  "EVERYONE charged with a criminal offence shall be presumed innocent until proven guilty according to law." and under

Article 6.3. "EVERYONE..... has the following minimum rights (a) to be informed promptly.... in detail ... nature and cause of charges against him .... (b) adequate time,... facilities.. to prepare his defence.... (c) to defend himself in person or through legal assistance of his own choosing free legal assistance in the interests of justice if he has not sufficient means to pay... (d) to examine of have examined witnesses against him ..to obtain attendance and examination of witnesses on his behalf under the same conditions as witnesses against him;    and (e)  to have the free assistance of an interpreter if he cannot understand or speak the language use in court."

Article 8.1.  "EVERYONE has the right to respect for his private and family life, his home and his correspondence.

Article 8.2.  "THERE SHALL BE NO interference by a public authority with the exercise of this right ..except in accordance with the law .. necessary in a democratic society..  interests of national security... public safety... economic well being of the country... the prevention of disorder or crime... the protection of health or morals or for the protection of the rights and freedoms of others." This is the most abused and breached piece of legislation by the organisers and managers of the CIUKU Enterprises:-

  • Our Masters and Lords seek to, and impose many a criminal act.
  • They do so through breaches of national law.
  • By relying upon, and using the 'subordinates created by the state'.
  • Those subordinates, as Public Servants, are also independent of the law - criminals'.
  • They are assured, by the controllers of it all, that 'No prosecutions are ever likely to be instigated, against them'.
  • Just AS IN THE NATIONAL SCANDAL scenarios.Forgeries used for the theft of funds belonging to third parties with plenty of FALSE INSTRUMENTS that lack accountability, as issued by persons in judicial office.
  • Officers of Law bluntly endorsing and promoting the criminal activities of public servants.
  • Collectrively acting in contempt of the law as authorised and licensed, by our representatives in government, to act so, for the implementation of CRIMES INTENDED thus LEADING TO THE NEW CODE OF MORALS, hatched up in secret sessions by the abductors of Democracy, attended by the MEDIA barons and their editors.
  • The theft and misappropriation of Housing Benefit funds.
  • Criminal activities in pursuit of organised multiple frauds on the public at large.
  • Forgeries used and no prosecutions because of the plan to create a melting pot.
  • All through arrogant interference in the affairs of other countries.
  • Criminals who steal from their masters (the citizens / taxpayers).
  • Public SERVANTS indulging in blunt crime at the expense of their employers.
  • And they dare determine how other countries and nations should run their own societies and affairs.
  • Our Lords and Masters wishing to play Godfather to the world.
  • They are not simply interfering in other countries.
  • As part of their master plan, THEY ARE BREAKING UP FAMILIES THROUGH ORGANISED FRAUDULENT ACTIVITIES in their own countries.
  • Plenty of breaches of national law and gross violations of international treaties and accords.
  • Criminal activities by the very guardians of 'the Law', OUR SERVANTS, who are retained by our 'elected, through frauds,' representatives in government.
  • OUR AGENTS acting and operating in government and states, which they misrepresent as alleged Democracies that, allegedly, rest and are founded on law and order, as ABSOLUTE DICTATORS in contempt of all law.
  • They do it all through the media barons and their stooges, with plenty of theatre.

To the well known quote by Abraham Lincoln we add, for the benefit of the abductors of Justice and Democracy, our founder's 'addenda', the fourth, dimension below:

  • "You can fool all of the people for some of the time".
  • "You can fool some of the people for all of the time".
  • "You cannot fool all of the people, all of the time".
  • We add "AND there are some people YOU can never fool at any time".

Article 9.  "EVERYONE has the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion..."

Article 10.  "EVERYONE has the right to FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION.... to HOLD OPINIONS...TO RECEIVE AND IMPART INFORMATION AND IDEAS without interference by public authority and regardless of frontiers..... (with provisions attached to ) maintaining the authority AND IMPARTIALITY of the judiciary".

Article 11.  "EVERYONE has the right of freedom of peaceful assembly and to freedom of  ASSOCIATION with others.... rights to form and join ... for the protection of HIS INTERESTS".

Article 13.  "EVERYONE whose rights and freedoms as set forth in this Convention are violated SHALL have an effective remedy before a national authority notwithstanding that the violation HAS BEEN committed by persons acting in an OFFICIAL CAPACITY."

Article 13 is VERY CLEAR. WHERE IS THE NATIONAL AUTHORITY THAT LOOKS INTO THE VIOLATIONS judges in the United Kingdom endorse, entertain AND INSTIGATE of their own? The question is simple and the Lord Chancellor with the Home Secretary should co-operate and produce the formula under which the citizens CAN challenge activities that blatantly breach national law and VIOLATE Human Rights. Converting the properties of others to alleged legal costs attached to fraudulent court proceedings is the worst anathema the United Kingdom is plagued with. One could not expect a clearer and more succinct a situation of abuses of court 'facilities' than in the Geoffrey Harold Scriven cases. WE have other cases on file. Where is the authority to investigate and prosecute the offenders?

Article 14.  "The enjoyment of the rights and freedoms set forth in this Convention shall be secured without discrimination on any grounds such as sex, race, colour, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, association with a national minority, property, birth or other status."

Below in HTML for links to and from


29th April 2003

The Rt. Hon. Frank Field MP
House of Commons
London - SW1A 0AA

My Ref: A03EATTP
Your Ref: ‘Think /Do the unthinkable’ brief.



Dear Sir
Re: Human Rights and the duties of Ministers / MPs in a Democratic State

I beg to refer you to:

  1. My letter of 18th December 1998, published originally in the public domain at:
  2. http://www.human-rights.demon.co.uk/natinscan.htm#WHERE_THERE_IS_A_WILL,_THERE_IS_A_WAY

    The above letter was posted to the Rt. Hon. Jack Straw, Home Secretary at the time. On that occasion it was noted that the government acted promptly.

  3. The stated facts of life, relative to our pseudo-democracy, as covered in our pages, are clear. The realities and realisations to the point. Included, in the stated facts, references to letters that I was caused to send, to you, in connection with the rampant fraud and corruption covered in our pages. The Free-For-All organised, always, by Public(!) Servants(?). Crimes seen to be endorsed and acquiesced, through blunt defaults from and by other public(!) Servants(?). The latter retained and maintained by other Public(!) Servants(?) to serve the citizens by applying their presumed knowledge of law to the facts known or stated to them and or raised with / brought to the attention of such Public(!) Servants(?).

The references to the letters that were sent to you can be accessed in the same page/web-site file at:

(b) http://www.human-rights.demon.co.uk/thefacts.htm#Ostrich_acts

I will appreciate an acknowledgement to this letter, by return post. A response proper, as soon as possible, is deemed essential because of the serious issues that my enquiries, now, and the matters that my communications, past and present, raised and raise with you. Indeed, others in public office, during, before and after my original submissions to you, personally, received substantial information and documented evidence in support of my submissions.

Please note that as part of the preparations for the publication of the facts of life, in the public domain, and the raising of the issues of ‘who are responsible for the rampant fraud and corruption through contempt of all law, as Public(!) Servants(?) indulge’, an explicit practice and ploy is pointed to by me, in the pages published by and at *human-rights*.

In respect of other facts, realities and convenient arrangements (pointed to by me at *human-rights*) I wish to enquire of you, if you are aware or were informed of the fact that the victims of the ‘Arms to, and for, Iraq’ fiasco: including the costly theatrical productions (court presentations), the torment and torture (through the court proceedings / charges / allegations) imposed on the victims of Public(!) Servants(?) received compensation, not long ago, running into millions of pounds sterling? ALL AT THE REXPENSE OF THE PUBLIC PURSE – the taxpayer : Mr & Mrs Average!

The succinct and explicit realities covered in the page:

(c) http://www.human-rights.demon.co.uk/confraud.htm

and the fundamental realities / practices covered in the other explicit page:

(d) http://www.human-rights.demon.co.uk/chaldep1.htm (URL points to new website)

led to the submissions last year to:

  1. The Treasury
  2. The Prime Minister
  3. The Home Secretary

And the submissions are covered at:

(e) http://www.human-rights.demon.co.uk/theyknow.htm

I am preparing for the release and publication, in the public domain, of the acknowledgement by the government in waiting in 1995, relative to THE SERIOUS ISSUE OF FRAUD IN THE LEGAL SYSTEM. I feel it my duty to draw your attention to the aforesaid facts. You were acting for the government you represent, at the time of my submissions to you. It is, therefore, incumbent upon me to enquire of you and to seek assistance, from a Minister who was caused to resign, in order that I may present a clearer picture on the issue of the melting pot. The criminal activities, by persons who ‘arrange world events’ through secret meetings and undeclared by government policies, lead to the citizens being defrauded of their properties and their rights in law. The activities also lead to the taxing of Mr & Mrs Average for the experiments in social restructuring by non-elected ‘criminally motivated / trained / tutored’ individuals, who abuse public office.

I need only remind you that the victims of such public(!) servants(?) have families and offsprings to care for. The citizens also have the inalienable right to plan for their futures and those of their children. The criminal activities that we cover in our pages, endorsed and acquiesced, as these are through the courts, amount to nothing short of ‘crimes against humanity’. When an elected government turns a blind eye and or ears to the evidence that no one can shove in his/her private or family closets, nor shove it all under the carpets of the salons that the offending public(!) servants(?) frequent, the issue of:

WHEN WILL THE GOVERNMENT that made promises in 1995 put an end to the abuse / use of the courts for the imposition of ‘the creeping dictatorship’, that I recognised as long ago as 1972/1975? The background and the evidence to/for the conclusions, then, is published at:

(f) http://www.human-rights.demon.co.uk/courts.htm

The false instrument published in the page, was made even falser after the criminals ‘goofed’. It was created / procured years after the events that led to the institution of court proceedings. The architects (legal circles) with the defaulting public(!) servants(?), (the police and judicial chair abusers) established beyond any doubt the rampant fraud and corruption through the courts. The Lords & Masters mentalities towards the citizens (‘subjects’ to the whims of the corrupters of societies) whom the offending public(!) servants(?) treat as serfs of the Middle Ages, was also born out of those events. I draw your personal attention to the fact that Lord Jeffrey Archer ended up behind bars while the architect and promoter of a false instrument FOR THE PERVERSION & CORRUPTION OF JUSTICE was rewarded with silk and subsequently appointed to ‘judicial chair occupancy’. With criminals in judicial chairs how can any government that knows of or becomes aware of ‘the facilities at / through the courts for RAMPANT FRAUD AND CRIMES ENDORSED BY THE LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES justify or assert ‘government founded and resting on law and order’?

Your response proper on the issue of the submissions that were ignored by your office / private staff (you?) are deemed essential. In the event that some subordinate or junior may be presumed responsible for suppression of my letters to you, I request that you access the page:

(g) http://www.human-rights.demon.co.uk/background.htm

There, the questions (in red): "WHO governs ? And How ?"

Also: Is the answer "Through Juniors and dereliction of Public Duty ?"

Andrew Yiannides
Founder / President
human-rights.org (NGO)

December 1998,   Letter to the Home Secretary


18 December 1998

The Rt. Hon. Jack Straw
Home Secretary
House of Commons Westminster London SW1 0AA


Our Ref. 18DTRPAP

Your Ref. The Influx of Refugees

Proof of Posting secured



Honourable Sir

Re: Press release Friday 18 December 1998

We attach hereto copies of letter delivered to:-

  1. The chief Executive at Haringey Council
  2. The MD at Diamond Lettings - managing agents for a property let to a refugee family
  3. Copy of a letter we sent to D Jones, reporter, whose explicit article was published by the Daily Mail.
  4. THREE copies of the FORGERIES referred to in the copies of the communications we attach hereto.
  5. Copy of part of an appeal to a co-operating in the scams County Court evincing a challenge of all in respect of the last tier (qualified below) in respect of the amount (rent) allegedly received by way of Housing Benefit as was remitted (occasionally) to the victim of all parties in the conspiracy to cause damages, the property owner. The challenge is clear "IF the property owner was to receive only the amount the council staff were aware of WHY WAS THE D.S.S not informed to remit only that amount for the property ? IS OFFICIALLY APPROVED FRAUD on the D.S.S budget part of the scams ? We need only add that copy of the serious issue (question-challenge was sent to Quary House - D.S.S fraud investigation Dpt. Leeds. We did not merit an acknowledgement? WHY ?

You will duly note that in our letter to the MD at Diamond Lettings we refer to various articles that appeared in the Daily Mail (in the meantime we had been bombarding them with evidence as to HOW the refugees are USED by rogue lettings agents AND COUNCIL staff and officers; presumably for personal reasons and or in accordance with corrupt council policies (abuse of the facilities at their disposal) care of Central Government without adequate checks and or TRULY independent supervision. 'Corrupt Britain' trumpeted Paul Johnson, in the Daily Mail on 6th November 1998. That could well be an understatement IF NO ACTION IS TAKEN NOW in respect of the Housing Benefit Social Security frauds operated by councils such as Haringey if not through policy by their staff, who abuse their public office and positions. The magnitude of the situation commands a S.F.O and or Public Auditor's office investigation URGENTLY.

We submitted to the Rt. Hon. Frank Field our findings in respect of the scams operated freely by council staff. Such at the expense of the private landlords who suffer as stated in the two attached letter copies. An explicit and succinct resume of the methods and the tactics used by all (council staff and letting agents with co-operating tenants as in the present case) was submitted to Max Clifford and Associates for possible use and investigative interest by any decent editor in the United Kingdom. However, as Diogenes stated in ancient Greece when asked why he was walking about the streets of Athens with a lit lantern in broad daylight, "I am Looking for a huMAN (?????p?), implying that all were animals. OUR newspapers are only interested in and report on multiple pregnancies AND the fact that an under age (14 year old girl) WAS IMPREGNATED by a 12 year old boy. Interestingly HER PARENTS (on social security) announced THEY WOULD BE HAPPY to raise their grandchild up, at the expense of the revenue providers, the decent citizens who are being called upon to be more productive and competitive in industry in order to maintain the amoral society all promote relentlessly from within the media. The deceptions and malaise, such as the abused properties let to the refugees ALL USE for their own ultimate goals; (how many and who else behind the scams and frauds on the victims?). Millions fleeced from the D.S.S budget through the tier system we refer to.

Needless to say we have sent evidence of a three tier operating system in respect of claims lodged with Social Security by benefits agencies (such as Haringey Council - a local authority).

  1. One amount is claimed from the D.S.S. (as authorised / approved by the conveniently independent Rent Officers who nevertheless ARE ON THE PAYROLL of the Local Authorities.
  2. Another amount is quoted to the co-operating in the scams letting agents and
  3. Another amount is then quoted to the owner of the property by the Letting agent who is provided with computer printouts to that effect, as and when the need arises.

In the case of the THREE forgeries (attached) ALL evince the very same photographic image of a signature. IT IS FOR YOUR OFFICE and those the Home Office retains, approves and or appoints to hold the esteemed (and questioned of recent) office of INVESTIGATING OFFICERS OF LAW to ORDER and conduct an investigation proper, set in motion in order that the truth may be known.

  1. Who introduced the original and only FORGERY in existence for months, in order to justify release of thousands of pounds worth of rents due and payable for and in respect of occupation of the property of our member (a private landlord) to the tenants ?
  2. Who responsible for introducing another TWO forgeries months later? From within the local authority's confines and delivered all three to the co-operating in the scam letting agents who then sat on the FORGERIES and suppressed them from us and the property owner for months !!!!

Sir, it is one thing to allege being an innocent, incapable and or incompetent person to deal or handle such criminal activities and FAIL at the same time to refer such criminal acts to the police. We need not point out that the use of forgeries in order to secure release of funds which later may be alleged as 'misappropriated by a 'moved on and or disappeared tenant (trained/instructed and USED actor - REFUGEE) are the basis of activities that generate CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUD on the victims.

We trust that your office will:

  1. Acknowledge this letter as a matter of courtesy. As an honourable member of the present government, who kept his promises to the Lawrence family and did not wish for a blanket over the news reports in respect of the mistake of your young son, we know that you WILL ACT as announced in the press in order to cease the free for all many from within latch on and abuse.
  2. Forward the attached documents to the Commissioner of the Metropolitan Police and or the officer now investigating bribes and corruption in high places considering that abuse of County Court facilities is fully documented and none has any defence in the operations of the scam, especially when the encouraged, goaded and instructed actor/tenant refugee IS PROMISED and was looking forward to the additional abuse of the Legal Aid facilities. SIR we can do without such imports; we have to look after own first. The elderly and the sick, those who offered their services and helped create through hard work and commitment. We need no imported scroungers safe the genuinely distressed, not those who are promised milk and honey and RIGHTS at our expense when the rights of the indigenous population and our own citizens are VIOLATED by persons who ought to know of SUCH law as well as their alleged obligations to provide for the poor refugees ABUSED for other ulterior goals and motives.

Sir, we conclude by informing you that we have conceived of a system that could cut down on the Housing Fraud scams using existing law without violating anybody's rights. Such practices as we have uncovered and have come to recognise as ILLEGAL and CRIMINAL ACTS can be minimised and or terminated quickly IF the Government so wishes. That much was related to the Rt. Hon. Frank Field when he was charged by our Prime Minister to think and do the unthinkable. OUR simple scheme and system WILL reduce the Housing Benefit frauds, but only if the Government so wishes and public bodies are instructed to co-operate; it is time for the monopoly that grants public servants opportunities to act outside the LAW and corruptly is dealt with (quietly). The monopoly of the corrupt/corruptible has to cease IF we are to recover as a strong economy and waste (through FRAUD) IS no more (at least reduced from within one well known area. The DO it. Don't worry we can also get you Legal Aid, THE constructive frauds on the Social Security budget.



Andrew Yiannides NDD., ACFI. ATI.
Landlords Action Group
65 Abbott's Park Road
London E10 6HU

ENCL. As text

READ BELOW the article that was published within days in the London Evening Standard.

  • Consider our submissions above to the MP, Frank Field Esq. ex-Minister who had been caused to resign years ago.
  • The first letter we pointed to above should also be read by ALL who access this site.
  • Every considerate human (thinking and feeling animal) should then consider WHERE BE THE DELIVERY OF JUSTICE to the British people, the taxpayers as we have been demanding for decades?
  • Can any housewife who does not keep a clean home, ever really assert or assume the right 'to clean up another's home'?.

FOOD FOR THOUGHT, dear Members of Parliament. Cease all manifestation inherent in puppets and act as the representatives of the citizens and not as the mainpulated 'slaves of the operators who organise and control CIUKU Enterprises.  

Evening Standard Monday, 12 May 2003 Page 11

The Home Secretary has irked the judiciary by seeking stricter sentences

for murder. Here he insists that courts must take more notice of the public

I won't give in

to the judges 

By David Blunkett

Home Secretary

MY announcement of new sentences for murders – so that life means life – provoked the latest wave of media coverage on my so-called war on the judges". I can see why. It is easy to caricature any disagreement as the hot-tempered working-class Sheffield boy taking on an icy-cool retired judge pontificating from his Surrey drawing room.

Yet I am not "at war" with judges, barristers or the rest of the legal profession. I believe strongly in a politically independent judiciary, the rule of law and due process. But I also believe in Parliament and a healthy democracy where people vote in elections because their vote can make a difference to the world they live in, through the politicians they elect. Surely it is possible to have a strong and lively debate about how Parliament and the judiciary fit together without it always being portrayed as a brawling slanging match?

This is not some dry debate in Westminster. Confidence in our criminal justice system is at an all-time low. Public respect for judges, politicians and lawyers alike is equally low. Up and down the country the experience of victims and witnesses is too often a poor one where they are treated as bit-players in a system which sees process as being more important than justice, where technicalities are more important than the truth.

When politicians make these points we are not seeking to wind up the legal profession for the sake of it. We are doing our job and speaking up for the public we serve. There are no newspaper editors, columnists or opinion formers living in my inner-city Sheffield constituency. If I don't speak about the experiences of my constituents and millions like them, they have no voice at all in the public arena.

I WANT to improve this situation and to get reform in the criminal justice system that brings the legal profession with us. To do this, we need a long hard look at the constitutional relationship between Parliament and the judges and be clear how it has changed.

This relationship has changed beyond all recognition over the past 30 years, thanks to the use of judicial review - the process by which an individual can ask the court to overturn the effect or implementation of a law on their individual circumstance. Judges now routinely use judicial review to rewrite the effects of a law that Parliament has passed.

This isn't just my view, it is endorsed by some of the most distinguished legal minds in the country. Professor Sir William Wade - the author of Administrative Law – has written: "The judges have established judicial review as an almost boundless jurisdiction over almost every kind of governmental activity". Lord Beloff QC has said that the activities of the judiciary have infringed the sovereignty of Parliament".

Lord Beloff also points out that in the 1950s, judicial review was confined to fewer than 100 cases a year relating to maladministration of government.

Now, there are thousands of cases every year in every field of commerce; construction, aviation, and IT, all inviting lawyers and judges to find ever more ingenious ways of getting what they want from the law Parliament has passed.

Added to this have been a rash of high-profile cases brought under the 1998 Human Rights Act which incorporated the European Convention on Human Rights into British law.

I believe most of these cases would have ended up in Strasbourg anyway, if we had not taken the step of building the ECHR into our legal system. But it has undoubtedly encouraged some in the legal profession to see a further way of rendering ineffective laws they don't like.

In my area, the impact of judicial review has been most visible in several high profile asylum cases on fast-track claims at the Oakington centre and cash payments for late claimants.

In both cases, the Home Office eventually won the legal arguments but not before a major tussle which resulted in plenty of premature headlines about our reforms being squashed.

These perceptions are vital to the health of our democracy. If people believe that Parliament has no power or influence and that whatever promises we make will eventually fail, how can we persuade people to vote, stand for elections and be involved in democracy?

People have to believe that Parliament genuinely speaks for them if they are to vote, and this can't be done if large parts of the legal system believe that it can seek to undo Acts of Parliament without any consequences for the health of our democracy.

This is not the same as saying that public opinion, however raw, should become law which is the way some commentators have interpreted my murder sentencing principles. Parliament's lawmaking process is usually a year of intense deliberation over finely worded, complicated pieces of legislation. This is the job of work which MPs and peers do, day in, day out.

We have to move away from a stand-off mentality in which parts of the legal profession respond to politicians with a "what's it to do with you?" attitude. I honestly believe that most lawyers and judges do want to see justice, not just procedural Pyrrhic victories.

I want that, too, as well as a system where judges can interpret the laws which have been clearly set out by a democratically elected Parliament.

AT the moment, we all too often have the worst of all worlds in which Parliament deliberates for months over laws which are then systematically undermined by overly aggressive judicial review decisions. There is a way forward here. The legal profession must embrace reform of the criminal justice system, not carp from the sidelines. Like most people, I respond better to an honest dialogue than to being shouted at.

A better relationship between the judges, barristers and politicians has to recognise our mandate as public representatives and not treat public opinion as something inherently disdainful which has no role in the formulation of law.

We all have to pause and draw breath at the scale and scope of judicial review and interpretations of the Human Rights Act if we are not to have spat after spat about the consequences.

A mature, clear legal system is one of the foundations of a democratic society. We all have a responsibility not to destroy the ground all of us want to stand on.

We have to move away from a stand-off mentality in which parts of the legal profession respond to politicians with `What's it to do with you?'

Ó Associated Newspapers UK
London Evening Standard – May 2003

FOOTNOTE common to most web-pages at this website
MOST IMPORTANT In October 2010, the coalition Government's Attorney General, in an interview published by 'COUNSEL' the monthly legal banter magazine, specifically spoke of the police distancing themselves from cases of (small-fry) fraud and he asserted that he was making that element his department's priority*

*Link from here to the evidence, to the images of the published article.

IT REMAINS TO BE SEEN, WHAT the coalition of the Con-LibDems, THE GOVERNMENT OF THE DAY WILL IN FACT ATTEND TO THE RAMPANT FRAUD, and IF IT WILL DEAL with the criminals who abuse public office, especially when faced with appropriate submissions and claims that will be delivered in due course. Visitors/readers are urged to read the article published in the London Evening Standard, as settled by the Rt. Hon. David Blunkett, Home Secretary in 2003

*Link from here to the article we reproduce in another webpage and consider "Why tolerate the arrogance of the legal circles who had and have the audacity to assert to the lawmakers that they, the lawmakers have nothing to do with the law"?

While there, above it, the explicit letter to ex-Minister, the Rt. Hon. Frank Field MP, delivered a few days earlier. ALL alleged victim-challengers who contacted Andrew Yiannides, by the time the letter was sent to the Minister, received copy of the letter just as they received copies of other letters submitted to government maintained Ministers and other official appointees to public office. Accessing the material pointed to from the letter (URLs) is of utmost importance. It should assist 'recognition of the citizen's rights at work', when called upon properly in truly democratic states. The above in 2003; there were other 'submissions' and among such civilised and, within the law, approaches by citizens that led to the right actions by governments, the explicit challenges when we set about exposing one of the most evil of alleged victims of the legal circles to have ever contacted us.

*Link to our explicit submissions to (a) the Prime Minister, (b) the Chancellor / Treasury, (c) the Home Secretary. We acted so after we had secured more than enough evidence about the parts of an alleged victim whose only interests were (i) the rewards under the table FOR KEEPING QUIET about the ORGANISED FRAUD THROUGH ABUSE OF THE COURTS' FACILITIES and (ii) her parts in blunt attempts that were intended to discredit the person she was sent along to mess about with, Mr Andrew Yiannides.

Access please the letter to the Home Secretary, the Rt. Hon. Jack Straw, in December 1998

*Link from here to the letter

& note the results evinced in the newspaper article (Hornsey Journal) also within days of the letter reaching its destination. Many the charlatans and stooges -lovers and 'promoters of the system as is'- on the job for decades; one and all acting as sold souls always do

*Link from here to the evidence we point to relative to the parts of one of a number of sold to the system fraudsters who were sent along / introduced to Andrew Yiannides by the managers / organisers of the LIPS crowd / mob..





Links to:   the Declaration   Citizens Rights - Assured in Law  OUR AIMS (Statement of Intent)

Links to:  The G H Screen HomePage   Confidentiality Between Fraudsters - FACTS

ACCESS:  http://www.justice-uk.human-rights.org (For an important message at this Community on Line web-site)
http://www.law.society.complaints.and.human-rights.org   (A judge instigates the Fraud On Tax Payers -  he knows not the difference between 'imposed' and 'no undue influence' by solicitor.)



The creator of this website was inviting victims to access URrights & join him there with other victims to expose & challenge abusers of trust & public office until the providers of the facilities >ning.com< introduced new terms and conditions for the provision of the facilities. Access from here and read of the imposed states by the brains behind ning.com and consider only one element "WHY OBSTRUCT & HINDER THE DOWNLOAD of the existing material at URrights.ning.com >the intellectual properties of the creator of that presence on the Internet and those who joined him there? Read below of the unacceptable conduct and behaviour by the reckless abusers of trust, who set out to obstruct and blackmail the creator of URrights.ning

Persons who are genuinely concerned and object to the ways they were / are being treated by alleged servants of the publicand the law >in any PSEUDOdemocracy, or whatever states / conditions they are subjected to< by abusers of public facilities and public office >as we cover in our web-pages< should contact webmaster@human-rights.org for information relevant to the creation of similar facilities for INFOrmation on URrights, for facilities for URrights EUrope and for a NETwork of URrights activists.

  • APOLOGIES to friends and persons who could not access URrights following the recent changes by the providers of the facility (ning.com) Andrew Yiannides created and used the portal to create the presence on the Internet for the group of victims / challengers who joined with him to expose and challenge the arrogant and blunt abuse of public services in all allegedly civilised societies > PSEUDODEMOCRACIES <.

  • The changes related to the introduction of charges for the facilities, included the facility for ning.com to archive the material at URrights; also the facility to download the archived material to the creator's system (computer) while the creator and his group of friends considered which of the level of charges and service the group was to adopt.

  • HOWEVER the creator, Andrew Yiannides, WAS UNABLE TO DOWNLOAD THE ARCHIVED MATERIAL and all attempts to engage the providers and their staff in reasonable explanation as to WHY THE FAILURES TO CONNECT / DOWNLOAD from the ning.com servers THE ARCHIVED MATERIAL, were contemptuously ignored.

  • Emails to the Publicity, to the Promotion, to the Public Relations, also to the Chief Executive's Office merited no response whatsoever from anyone acting for ning.com

  • In the circumstances Andrew will appreciate any information related to the problems covered above. Andrew will also appreciate any information relative to exchanges with or email postings, from ning.com to existing members.

  • EXISTING URrights members, victims of the legal system, victims of solicitors and the courts should access the updated pages at .org/solicitors.htm and .org/solfraud.htm by using the links from the list below.

Below pages where we expose known lovers of it all, users and maintenance engineers of the system as is

.org/1999dfax.htm .org/1ofmany.htm .org/2lipstalk.htm .org/4deceit.htm .org/absolute.htm .org/abusers.htm
.org/account4.htm .org/actors.htm .org/actors2.htm .org/adoko.htm .org/bankers.htm .org/beware.htm
.org/blunket1.htm .org/chaldep1.htm .org/confraud.htm .org/contract.htm .org/convicti.htm .org/courts.htm
.org/corruptcourts.htm .org/crimesin.htm .org/dreamers.htm .org/evesused.htm .org/evilones.htm .org/famfraud.htm
.org/govolso.htm .org/guesswhy.htm .org/len.htm .org/mauricek.htm .org/media.htm .org/solfraud.htm
.org/solicitors.htm .org/someplan.htm .org/someploy.htm .org/thefacts.htm .org/theproof.htm .org/thenerve.htm
.org/twisted.htm .org/uaccount.htm .org/ukmm.htm .org/uwatchit.htm .org/watchit1.htm .org/yourtax.htm
  • Every single person we name and expose in the above pages elected to ignore THEIR OBLIGATIONS TO REPORT (to 'the serfs' = 'the taxpayers'), THE ABUSERS OF PUBLIC OFFICE & PUBLIC FACILITIES. All were/are relying on the Intellectual Prostitutes, from within the media, to keep it all in the family closet.
  • All, as typical twin-tongue hypocrites carry on complaining about the media for failing to report & for suppressing the facts and the realities they allegdely reported to the hard of hearing, to the otherwise committed angels blowing their silent trumpets for decades, all ready and gearing to welcome the expansion of the New World Order.
  • Of such parts the contributions from and failings of the persons we name and expose, AS IF THEIR OWN SILENCE, THEIR FAILURES  & THEIR BLUNT OBSTRUCTIONS to the work and other actions by the creator of this website, Andrew Yiannides, treated by one and all as if non-existent with the exception when the wily Norman Scarth, set off to abuse the trust he was allowed to benefit from, while his parts and questionable activities / performance were under scrutiny, specifically after HE FAILED to publish the full transcript of the Court of Appeal hearing HE WAS ALLOWED TO RECORD* [*Link from here to the food for thought page created by Andrew Yiannides, in the first instance].
  • Not one ever bothered to address the issues we expose in the explicit page, despite the fact that we have been pointing all of our contacts, since May 1992, to it all.
  • Visitors, readers and researchers are urged / invited to access and read the letter which the Hon. Secretary of the Litigants In Person Society, Mr. Norman Scarth sent to the founder of human-rights, Mr. Andrew Yiannides, reproduced in the page .org/4deceit.htm* [*L]
  • The author's statements, such as 'what for and why seek additional assistance', thereby spelling out his parts as a lover of it all.
  • Common sense dictates, that he should have directed his request to his partners in deceptions aplenty, one & all engaging in fraudulent misrepresentations AND NOTED TO HAVE, WILFULLY, BEEN SUPPRESSING, FROM THE TAXPAYERS, THE FACTS OF LIFE RELATIVE TO THE RAMPANT ABUSE OF THE COURTS FACILITIES as the failure of all to co-operate as covered and pointed to at:- [*L]. One and all fallen to the facilities for fraud aplenty on the taxpayers and the corruption of illiterates in law, the conditioned victims of the legal circles & courts who fall to the blackmail element attached to the REWARD for keeping the realities away from the taxpayers; just like the media and the Ministers responsible for the application of long existing law to the criminal activities we cover in our pages, do.
  • All the while one and all were / are engaging in the scenarios we cover in the exclusive page, which page the author of the letter which Mr Norman Scarth sent to Andrew Yiannides, afforded us the opportunity to address the issue of the contributions of his partners and affiliates in fraud aplenty on the taxpayers; despite the reminder one and all, named in the new page simply shoved it all in the dark corners of their devoid of grey matter skulls, their perverted / corrupted mind(s)

On Sunday morning, the 19th September 2010, the Deputy Prime Minister, leader of the Liberal-Democrats in the course of the BBC TV politics programme, spoke of the coalition government's commitment to address the element of waste and fraud through the public services sector. We trust and hope that the elements we expose in our pages and the parts adopted by the conditioned victims of the legal circles, the persons who engage in PROMOTING & EXPANDING THE ONGOING CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUD ON THE TAXPAYERS, THROUGH ABUSE OF THE COURTS' FACILITIES, will be on the top of the list of government priorities.
Visitors, readers & researchers are urged to access the letters to Minister Frank Field [*L] after he had been directed by the Prime Minister to think/do the unthinkable.
Link also from here [*L] to the explicit letter to the Home Secretary in December 1998 with submissions arising out of the RAMPANT HOUSING BENEFIT FRAUD
On Tuesday 23rd November 2010, 'the Guardian' in its Comment & Debate page carried an article by Nick Clegg, the Deputy Prime Minister. In the evening of the same day the Deputy Prime Minister addressed a large audience at Kings place in respect of the government's changes on university students fees / loans.
Access from here the page where we reproduce an image of 'the Guardian' article & consider the simple fact that we, alone, have been asserting and proclaiming our objections to the theft of funds from the national budget leading to the ever-increasing annual deficit in the state's balance of payments.

ACCESS:  http://www.justice-uk.human-rights.org/ (For an important message at this Community-on-Line web-site) & thereafter,
Access also http://www.law.society.complaints.and.human-rights.org/ (Judge instigates Fraud On Tax Payers - he knows not the difference between 'imposed' & 'no undue influence'). APOLOGIES FOR THE DISAPPEARANCE OF THIS WEBSITE.It appears that the beneficiary of the work, both for applications to the courts in the United Kingdom and the submissions to the European Court for Human Rights* [*Link from here to the Statement of Facts submitted to the ECoHR], arranged with the providers of the free web space to erase the Intellectual Property of Andrew Yiannides, the founder of the human-rights Community-on-Line, without any reference to the creator of the website and owner of the Intellectual Property!
鼯font> Copyright subsists on all material in our web-site, owned by the authors of same.
Visitors can refer to these pages in any non commercial activity, so long as attribution is given as to source. License to use, for commercial or other specific use of the material, shall have been secured in writing first, from the owners of any property and material from these pages. No material shall be reproduced in any form and by any means without prior agreement and or license in writing from the copyright owners. The Press are invited to contact us if they wish to publish material in the Public Interest, As We Do.
For any problems or questions regarding this web-site contact:  webmaster