3rd March 2011 added link [**L] to the BBC-TV Dimbleby Lecture in 1976 as the Metropolitan Police Commissioner, Sir Robert Mark prepared & presented to the sucker-serfs

This web-site is dedicated to the memory of the niece of our founder, Rita Englezakis; a fine young lady who was caused to take her own life because of her father's, and his clan's, cruel attitude to her needs. Read about the circumstances that lead to the tragic loss of that life. Consider that it was all because of GREED. Precisely what our legal system serves for the operatives through ILL legal services care of our legal experts and the modus operandi from within. (access her mother's site)

SIX months before taking her own life that fine young lady proclaimed to our founder :-
"I can't understand it uncle everyone thinks of bricks mortar and money

fraudvitiates.htm           KEY Page Changes 1 April 2011

Fraud Vitiates Judgements * Page created February 1997 *

hrbnrsml.gif (1162 bytes) NGO

..... so held the Court of Appeal .....

  NEWS & New Material
* Web-site Dedication *
*Fraud In The Legal System*

Solicitors PROMOTE BLUNT FORGERY. All part of the services the Law Enforcement Agencies, including judges and the police, provide to criminals who seek & can pay for services under the counter.*Link from here to the evidence & from the page access also deliberations by their Lordships when in 1939/1940 the House of Lords was called upon to consider a less offensive scenario attached to the failures & reckless activities by solicitors. Note the elements their Lordships addressed in respect of conspiracy, fraud, deception, lies and the implications arising when persons elect to keep quiet and suppress knowledge of wrongdoing / criminal activities.

HELP US TO HELP YOU Please (*Link to plea).

Affiliated sites for
The CAMILA Project
data collection:


OUR AIMS : Link to the statement of intent & to the Declaration with which to challenge all offenders, especially public servants. Access Your Rights page and consider co-operating with other victims. Your stance and position our invitation for  serious consideration if public servants breached 'The Law & Violated Your Rights giving you cause to complain or to ACT at / in law.

Some Convention Rights
Article 6.1 Court Hearings
Article 6.2 Court Hearings
Article 6.3 Court Hearings
Article 8.1 Respect 4 Family
Article 8.2 Family Rights
Article 9  Free TO THINK +++
Article 10 Free to Share Info
Article 11 Free JoinAssemble Article 1 of Protocol One
Article 2 of Protocol One
Article 14 No Discrimination
Article 34 Persons can Apply
Convention In LEGAL TERMS
MORE RIGHTS for citizens
European Union Provisions

To Site Pages - List  *SPECIAL PAGES* please access Updated Pages

FRAUD and a Disturbing Quote: "You must not disclose this. You must keep quiet about this settlement. The taxed contributors to the funds we are using, the suckers, must not get to know of this facility. Remember WE have just BOUGHT YOUR SILENCE. Welcome to THE FRAUDSTERS CLUB. [*Link from here to the page where we expose the scheme used to defraud citizens of their rights in law and thereafter to corrupt the conditioned / defrauded victims, of the legal circles, to lovers of the abused court facilities]

To Site Pages List

July 20, 2000, 'The Guardian' Headlines  clear.
		(77513 bytes)
"United Kingdom Scorned  by the United Nations on its Human Rights Record". Our comments clear and so is The Law.  Access the explicit page where we cover YOUR RIGHTS,  *linked to from here and recognise HOW & WHY the situation. READ of THE  LAW intended to protect you from Fraud & Corruption and  ACT with and as other victims for the common cause and benefit.

The Guardian Headlines on 9 July 1999 very clear.  FRAUD and deception NOT a criminal offence? Concealment? And what of CONTEMPT FOR THE EVIDENCE AGAINST PINOCHET not to mention THE LAW ?hofparr.jpg (89547 bytes)
Our observations and fair comment stated. Access and read in our pages  the tactics used and the practices of the professionals.
*We act in the public interest and we invite victims of malpractice and denials of rights to join the human-rights Community On Line.
OUR AIMS should be every victim's first consideration. We intend to cause abusers of the legal system and the courts' facilities to cease the free for all at the expense of the citizens they target.
It is for the visitors to our pages to express their own views on the constructive FRAUDS on the budget, on Mr & Mrs Average. We draw your attention to the explicit page where we cover the arrangements in place. Get to know how and why the free for all entices the greedy and the seedy into the folds of 'The Fraudsters Club' (*Link).

Page CHANGES - List
1. Link to Confidential Fraud
2. Persons Referred To - List

undercon.gif (286 bytes) Page Revised June 20, 2012 Added links to and from the page
Site reconstruction for better navigation; ongoing improvements & additions to pages

-http://www.SolicitorsFromHell.co.uk  Have you BEEN LET DOWN, MESSED ABOUT BY SOLICITORS? Just go to the site and check the register created and maintained FOR YOU, THE VICTIMS, to refer to and use in order to check if a solicitor recommended to you is 'clean'. IF ONE HAS LET YOU DOWN, acted questionably or even downright dishonestly simply use your rights and register your reasons for complaining. Include the offending solicitor and the firm if both let you down. If the solicitor moved on just register the details of your complain against the name of the solicitor and include the firm if you raised complaints while the solicitor was with the firm. USE YOUR RIGHTS and above all CONSIDER YOUR OBLIGATIONS TO OTHER CITIZENS who could be the next and future victims of the same solicitor or firm.

- http://www.justiceraped.org The web-site aims to address the issues of false judgements, hence the sub-title Judging The Judges. REFER to our founder's Legal Arguments on the issue of accountability by judicial chair occupants at http://www.uk-human-rights.org/lawcompi.htm#brief (this web-site). Recognise that the type of failings / defaults our founder points to, happen to be INDICTABLE OFFENCES under various Acts of Parliament none more clear than the THEFT ACTS of 1968 & 1978. Any Order issued by any judge who failed / fails to take into account solid evidence (as the fraudsters who were abusing judicial chair occupation, perverting justice and imposing legal costs charges on the victim of the legal circles in contempt of the evidence and applicable law) is null and void and a FALSE INSTRUMENT BECAUSE OF SUCH FAILURES. Remember that the most promoted adage relative to The LAW, stipulates that IGNORANCE OF THE LAW IS NO DEFENCE. In the instance of the legally trained, the professionals none can even claim 'ignorance of the law', because after all they are licensed by the Law Society, The Bar and permitted by the state to practise law in our thoroughly corrupted legal ad court services, in much the same way as in most pseudo-democracies. When at the site access the articles submitted by the founder of Mr Andrew Yiannides, the founder of human-rights.org and webmaster of the affiliated web-site http://www.uk-human-rights.org/ (this web-site) affiliated   .

-http://www. justice-uk.human-rights.org A Community On Line web-site. Introducing visitors, who join the Community, to recognise why we invite the citizens of the world to join in the exposures that are called for. We, the citizens CAN put an end to breaches in public office by persons in authority, everywhere, because they abducted Justice and Democracy. They are raping them both daily, while our media and politicians are promoting assertions that our pseudo-democracies are founded and rest on law and order. A typical case of how our courts and legal services operate, in the United Kingdom, can be found there. Access "The Builder's- case" and note how a solicitor and court staff, with the court service 'gurus' playing footsie,  indulged and attempted to convert an agreed settlement (consent order following mediation) to alleged legal costs through an attempted scenario that was to be created for proposed hearings etc. Read of the fair comment, in a letter to the solicitor:-   "Typical of a solicitor you honour nothing".

-http://www.law.society.complaints.and.human-rights.org   A Community On Line web-site with plenty of precedent cases stated covering your rights under the provisions of the Limitations Acts when material facts are kept secret and concealed from you. A cheated woman, was intimidated, blackmailed and caused to enter into a divorce settlement by her own solicitors. Her solicitors indulged in much behind the scenes and the settlement, as imposed on her, has even been misrepresented as a court order per se, whereas the court had no input in the 'consent agreement'! The client had been told by one and all that the settlement agreement as a 'consent order' (proper) could not be challenged, as if a judicious decision proper! After requesting for the file from the solicitors who imposed the settlement, through intimidation and much more, she came across much that had never been referred to her. Those activities having been concealed from her introduced elements covered by law. She acted after she failed to get 'any other member of the law society to act against their brothers' who deceived and cheated her.  Read an explicit transcript establishing that a high court judge was of two minds. Although he determined that the consent agreement / settlement was imposed on the client by the solicitors nonetheless he endorsed an order drafted by the solicitors defending their client(brother-in-arms) whereby, the  judge entered judgement asserting there was 'no undue influence by the solicitor on the client'! Visit the site for an education on how the dishonest and deceitful can be challenged. We, and the victim, invite you to inform us if you can tell the difference between IMPOSED & No undue influence. Read the affidavit and evidence attached to it and contact the victim with your views and or support. Together, all  CAN BRING DEMOCRACY BACK ON KEEL.

-http://www.natwestfraud.com/   All about how a bank defrauding a client who has been caused to  publish all relevant material and expose the high and mighty that always rely on others, within the law enforcement agencies  to get away with anything and everything. Recommended to anyone who has been faced with similar activities.

-http://www.fame97.human-rights.org A Community On Line web-site where much more than just fraud and deception by the bank was part of the scheming manipulations by the dishonest and deceitful that abound in the high strata of our society, within the legal circles and the courts. From banks through to solicitors, the courts and much more. Sadly the 'victim' engaged in other areas that exposed him as an abuser of trust and we request visitors to access explicit email exchanges with the owner of the site / work. In the same page exchanges with another abuser of trust and our time, an obvious fraudsters club recruit who engaged in a bizarre scenario with the site owner. (*Link to the page and consider accessing thereafter the exclusive page where we expose fraudsters club recruits and lovers of the double constructive frauds on the tax payers THROUGH ABUSE OF THE COURTS FACILITIES. The owner of the work and site also features in another explicit scenario when Andrew, the founder of human-rights (NGO) was threatened with legal action because of the work at the site *Link to the aforesaid page).  

-http://www.dorsetpolice.com   The site Dorset Police sought to block. Mr Gerry Colder, for years now, has been challenging much from within Dorset police. He successfully challenged the attempts to silence him. A must for victims of any police breaches.

-http://www.caught.net   A site where much the same material about the legal / judicial services in the USA.  Worth a visit and recommended for the information and because of its educational value.

-http://www.opengroup.com/babooks/095/095322080X.shtml    All about a divorce, an "Outrageous Fortune" (the title of the full story as published in a well reviewed book). AND ALL ABOUT & HOW THE LEGAL CIRCLES AND SYSTEM had the author tied up in the courts for 14 years - hence the title of the book. Access also the explicit appeal ( LAF1 ) we publish in our pages and recognise why THE Divorce Industry. (We refer you to the Explicit Appeal in the Corrupt Courts page (links) where the machinations of the legal circles, in a typical divorce 'enterprise' in the United Kingdom, are covered.

-http://www.british-columbia.ca.human-rights.org   More of the same in Canada too. Mr David Hunter-Thompson who has been publishing under the aptly named www.ourcourtscuck.com joined the human-rights.org Community On Line. The web-site will be the main and central platform from where he will exercise his rights to freedom of expression. Serious critique, arising out of the activities of the abusers of the legal system in the part of the world where he resides, can be accessed there. He has been the victim of the rampant fraud and corruption, through ' the courts service' as William Shakespeare and Charles Dickens wrote of and as Thomas Jefferson qualified and acted upon when in government. Our present government, when in opposition in 1995,  promised to act. We look forward to OUR AGENTS IN GOVERNMENT to make good their promises.

-http://www.pafe.human-rights.org A site dedicated to assisting father's, the victims of the divorce industry. Many the victims whose rights are breached and violated contemptuously in the course of divorce proceedings. The issues covered in the book of Genesis, and the use of Eves for the loss of man's peace of mind, very close to the hearts of the creators and administrators of the site.

-http://www.mk-family.human-rights.org At the site an abundance of links to many other sites.   An excellent point of reference, and a must for victims of the courts and the legal circles, particularly family and the suffering of the children, when officials follow their set patterns without any reference to the individual, the person.

-http://www.52.human-rights.org And in the new 'amoral(!) democratic(!) Slovenia too, where officials have learnt to act in the very same way as our very own. There, too, the citizens treated as serfs by their authoritarian Lords and Masters, in control of the state and the 'future of the serfs'. There, too, the citizens slave away for their Lords and Masters to plunder and benefit, from the serfs toil, through misuse and abuse of public office!  Another democratic(?) state resting and founded on law(?) and order(!) as promoted and put in place by the controllers of it all.

-http://www.scottish.lbduk.org/ New contacts with a group challenging positive discrimination in family matters at court.

-http://www.bigglesguy.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/scot.html A member of the above group challenging positive discrimination. The group is introducing links to human-rights and linking up with and to Community On Line members' sites. Promoting the common cause and challenging the violations of human-rights through and by the legal circles is the focal point.

-http://www.lbduk.org The main web-site and the HomePages of the Live Beat Dads UK movement. Links to other sites within the world-wide group. All exposing and challenging the 'milk you dry practices' by the legal circles/system the controllers operate in alleged democracies. The practices are covered in the appeal (*link) we publish in our pages. The site is a must for both sexes, all who have been caught in the web of intrigue and constructive frauds of and by the legal-circles, the scavenging parasites. Citizens OWE it to themselves to visit the site. They should do so in their own interest and for their children's sake. 

-http://www.mkfamily.human-rights.org A web-site covering more of the vile impositions on families by the criminals who are in control. The site has plenty of links to other sites that cover family issues. The web-master is to be congratulated for the growing data base of links to groups of pro-active challengers. 

-http://www.SolicitorsFromHell.org The site is all geared up to maintain records and data about solicitors it receives information about. An open to the web user data bank. We congratulate the creator Mr Rick Kordowski for using his rights and affording victims of the solicitors fraternity the opportunity to name and shame solicitors who act in breach of trust and cheat more often than not deceitfully, always with the blessings of the infamous Office for the Supervision of Solicitors. (*Link to our alternative name for the set-up)

-http://www.nhs-horror.org.uk NEW. Another site challenging and exposing incompetence, waste and much more within our National Health Service. Ones the envy of the world now subject to the whims of non medical executives.

Page Revised: June 20, 2012.

..... so held the Court of Appeal .....

We publish the following extract from:   'Lazarus Estates Ltd. -v- Beasley'

"....I cannot accede to this argument for a moment.  No court in this land will allow a person to keep an advantage which he has obtained by fraud.  No judgement of a court, no order of a Minister, can be allowed to stand if it has been obtained by fraud.  Fraud unravels everything.  The court is careful not to find fraud unless it is distinctly pleaded and proved; but ones it is proved it vitiates judgements, contracts and all transactions whatsoever; see as to deeds....... So, here, I am of opinion that if this declaration is proved to have been false and fraudulent, it is a nullity and void......"  ( Denning LJ).

There it is in a nutshell. We shall be publishing through our pages, documents that in law were at the time they were first used, and to this day remain and ARE, NOTHING BUT FORGERIES*. And a FORGERY used in order to gain a pecuniary advantage leads to FRAUD.  Fraud is fraud and NO ONE IS ABOVE THE LAW, so our legal experts have been professing for centuries. The citizens are no longer illiterate serfs of the middle ages to be used as subjects to the whims of the dishonest.... and or in the manners we are and shall be exposing through this web-site and the explicit TAP pages.

Section 1 of the Counterfeiting Act 1981, qualifies:-"A person is guilty of forgery if he makes a false instrument with the intention that he or another shall use it .......   

and  in law "..the 'actus reus' of forgery is the making of a false instrument. This obviously includes the original production of an instrument which is false as soon as it is produced". [*Link from here to a page where we publish evidence that TWO Lord Justices at the Court of Appeal were conscioius accessories, abettors and arrogantly acting in contempt of the law as they delivered their judgment pursuant to an application by the creators, users and promoters of a FORGERY (original instrument) which the conspirators subsequently FORGED TOO, and were looking to / relying on abusers of judicial chair occupation to DENY JUSTICE TO THE VICTIM BECAUSE OF.....   ]

and     ".....a person is to be treated for the purposes of this part of... as making a false instrument if he alters an instrument so as to make it false in any respect whether or not it is false in some other respect apart from the alteration; in other words making includes :-

    1.     Making an instrument which is false

    2.     Making a genuine instrument false

    3.     Making a false instrument even falser.

and   "It must also be proved that the person procuring or making the false instrument intended the false instrument to be used so as to induce the person accepting it, to or not to do some act to his own or someone else's prejudice".     

and     ".... An act or omission intended to be induced, is to a person's prejudice if and only if it is one if it occurs  (a) will result  (1) in his temporary or permanent loss of property or (2) in his being deprived of an opportunity to earn greater remuneration, or (3) in his being deprived of an opportunity to gain a financial advantage otherwise than by way of remuneration".

and   " or will result in somebody being given an opportunity (1) to earn remuneration or greater remuneration from him, or (2)  to gain a financial advantage from him otherwise than by way of remuneration, or  (3) will be the result of his having accepted a false instrument as genuine in connection with his performance of any duty".

and     "..  the concept of an intent to cause prejudice is very similar to that of intent to defraud in the old law. It is sufficient if the maker of the instrument intents some other person to suffer financial loss or somebody else to gain a financial advantage at that person's expense".

and    "..  the law on FORGERY is supplemented by two offences under section 20 of The Theft Act 1968: -  (1) The offence of procuring the execution of a valuable security by deception contrary to section 20.2 is considered ..... together with the other offences of deceptions. It may be a useful alternative to FORGERY where the instrument is not made by the offender/user himself but by a person whom he has deceived into making it.

and    ".. a person who dishonestly with a view to gain for himself or another with intent to cause loss to another destroys, defaces or conceals any valuable security any Will or other testamentary document or any original document of or belonging to filed or deposited in any court of Justice or any government department shall on indictment be liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 10 years".

It is for the average decent citizens within the UK and the world at large,  as jurors, to consider the law and the various false instruments, FORGERIES, used as intended by the offenders in each relevant case, in order to defraud their victims. Those who will be submitting the 'instruments' through these pages for all the world to marvel at, the ingenuity the capabilities and the defaults / omissions of and within the Law Enforcement Agencies. The cases of Geoffrey Harold Scriven brought to the surface the facts of life and the capabilities of the operators of 'the system'. It suffices to point out that in Mr Scriven's case the court was satisfied for a change, the court did not ignore the evidence. The many cases and the hearings, the victims of which will be submitting through these pages their own case histories; the evidence in support in each instance will be published too in order to challenge the offenders; those who ignored the Law and the Evidence presented to them.  It shall then be up to the authorities, the investigative branch of the Law Enforcement Agencies, the police*, to act as the law* provides and to investigate properly, alongside the present high profile investigations into the activities of the 'untouchables'.

Link to:   h-r Home Page  Violations  Lord Chancellor  Nothing but FORGERIES

Link to:  Misconduct in Public Office  Justice Blind Deaf Dumb  The LAW   Police

Link to:  Home Office  Scarth cases  Scriven cases 

Revised: June 20, 2012.


Footnote eXtra: In October 2010, the coalition's Attorney General, in an interview published by 'COUNSEL' specifically spoke of the police distancing themselves from cases of (small-fry) fraud and asserted that he was making that element his department's priority. IT REMAINS TO BE SEEN, WHAT the coalition of the Con-LibDems, THE GOVERNMENT OF THE DAY, WILL IN FACT ATTEND TO THE RAMPANT FRAUD. IF IT WILL DEAL APPROPRIATELY with the criminals who abuse public office, especially when faced with appropriate submissions and claims that will be delivered in due course. Visitors/readers are urged to read the article published in the London Evening Standard, as settled by the Rt. Hon. David Blunkett, Home Secretary in 2003 [*Link from here to the article we reproduce in another webpage and consider "Why tolerate the arrogance of the legal circles who had and have the audacity to assert to the lawmakers that the lawmakers have nothing to do with the law"]. While there, above it, the explicit letter to ex-Minister, the Rt. Hon. Frank Field MP, delivered a few days earlier. ALL alleged victim-challengers who contacted Andrew Yiannides, by the time the letter was sent to the Minister, received copy of the letter just as they received copies of other letters submitted to government maintained Ministers and other official appointees to public office. Accessing the material pointed to from the letter (URLs) is of utmost importance. It should assist 'recognition of the citizen's rights at work', when called upon properly in truly democratic states. The above in 2003; there were other 'submissions' and among such civilised and, within the law, approaches by citizens that led to the right actions by governments, the explicit challenges when we set about exposing one of the most evil of alleged victims of the legal circles to have ever contacted us [*Link to our explicit submissions to (a)  the Prime Minister, (b) the Chancellor / Treasury, (c) the Home Secretary. WE acted so after we had secured more than enough evidence about the parts of an alleged victim whose only interests were (i) the rewards under the table FOR KEEPING QUIET about the ORGANISED FRAUD THROUGH ABUSE OF THE COURTS' FACILITIES and (ii) her parts in blunt attempts that were intended to discredit the person she was sent along to mess about with, Mr Andrew Yiannides]. Access please the letter to the Home Secretary, the Rt. Hon. Jack Straw, in December 1998 [*Link* [*L] from here to the letter] and note the results evinced in the newspaper article (Hornsey Journal) also within days of the letter reaching its destination. Many the charlatans and stooges -lovers and 'promoters of the system as is'- on the job for decades; one and all acting as sold souls always do [*Link [*L] from here to the evidence we point to relative to the parts of one of a number of sold to the system fraudsters who were sent along / introduced to Andrew Yiannides by the managers / organisers of the LIPS crowd / mob].




The creator of this website was inviting victims to access URrights & join him there with other victims to expose & challenge abusers of trust & public office until the providers of the facilities >ning.com< introduced new terms and conditions for the provision of the facilities. Access from here and read of the imposed states by the brains behind ning.com and consider only one element "WHY OBSTRUCT & HINDER THE DOWNLOAD of the existing material at URrights.ning.com >the intellectual properties of the creator of that presence on the Internet and those who joined him there? Read below of the unacceptable conduct and behaviour by the reckless abusers of trust, who set out to obstruct and blackmail the creator of URrights.ning

Persons who are genuinely concerned and object to the ways they were / are being treated by alleged servants of the publicand the law >in any PSEUDOdemocracy, or whatever states / conditions they are subjected to< by abusers of public facilities and public office >as we cover in our web-pages< should contact webmaster@human-rights.org for information relevant to the creation of similar facilities for INFOrmation on URrights, for facilities for URrights EUrope and for a NETwork of URrights activists.

  • APOLOGIES to friends and persons who could not access URrights following the recent changes by the providers of the facility (ning.com) Andrew Yiannides created and used the portal to create the presence on the Internet for the group of victims / challengers who joined with him to expose and challenge the arrogant and blunt abuse of public services in all allegedly civilised societies > PSEUDODEMOCRACIES <.

  • The changes related to the introduction of charges for the facilities, included the facility for ning.com to archive the material at URrights; also the facility to download the archived material to the creator's system (computer) while the creator and his group of friends considered which of the level of charges and service the group was to adopt.

  • HOWEVER the creator, Andrew Yiannides, WAS UNABLE TO DOWNLOAD THE ARCHIVED MATERIAL and all attempts to engage the providers and their staff in reasonable explanation as to WHY THE FAILURES TO CONNECT / DOWNLOAD from the ning.com servers THE ARCHIVED MATERIAL, were contemptuously ignored.

  • Emails to the Publicity, to the Promotion, to the Public Relations, also to the Chief Executive's Office merited no response whatsoever from anyone acting for ning.com

  • In the circumstances Andrew will appreciate any information related to the problems covered above. Andrew will also appreciate any information relative to exchanges with or email postings, from ning.com to existing members.

  • EXISTING URrights members, victims of the legal system, victims of solicitors and the courts should access the updated pages at .org/solicitors.htm and .org/solfraud.htm by using the links from the list below.

Below pages where we expose known lovers of it all, users and maintenance engineers of the system as is

.org/1999dfax.htm .org/1ofmany.htm .org/2lipstalk.htm .org/4deceit.htm .org/absolute.htm .org/abusers.htm
.org/account4.htm .org/actors.htm .org/actors2.htm .org/adoko.htm .org/bankers.htm .org/beware.htm
.org/blunket1.htm .org/chaldep1.htm .org/confraud.htm .org/contract.htm .org/convicti.htm .org/courts.htm
.org/corruptcourts.htm .org/crimesin.htm .org/dreamers.htm .org/evesused.htm .org/evilones.htm .org/famfraud.htm
.org/govolso.htm .org/guesswhy.htm .org/len.htm .org/mauricek.htm .org/media.htm .org/solfraud.htm
.org/solicitors.htm .org/someplan.htm .org/someploy.htm .org/thefacts.htm .org/theproof.htm .org/thenerve.htm
.org/twisted.htm .org/uaccount.htm .org/ukmm.htm .org/uwatchit.htm .org/watchit1.htm .org/yourtax.htm
  • Every single person we name and expose in the above pages elected to ignore THEIR OBLIGATIONS TO REPORT (to 'the serfs' = 'the taxpayers'), THE ABUSERS OF PUBLIC OFFICE & PUBLIC FACILITIES. All were/are relying on the Intellectual Prostitutes, from within the media, to keep it all in the family closet.
  • All, as typical twin-tongue hypocrites carry on complaining about the media for failing to report & for suppressing the facts and the realities they allegdely reported to the hard of hearing, to the otherwise committed angels blowing their silent trumpets for decades, all ready and gearing to welcome the expansion of the New World Order.
  • Of such parts the contributions from and failings of the persons we name and expose, AS IF THEIR OWN SILENCE, THEIR FAILURES  & THEIR BLUNT OBSTRUCTIONS to the work and other actions by the creator of this website, Andrew Yiannides, treated by one and all as if non-existent with the exception when the wily Norman Scarth, set off to abuse the trust he was allowed to benefit from, while his parts and questionable activities / performance were under scrutiny, specifically after HE FAILED to publish the full transcript of the Court of Appeal hearing HE WAS ALLOWED TO RECORD* [*Link from here to the food for thought page created by Andrew Yiannides, in the first instance].
  • Not one ever bothered to address the issues we expose in the explicit page, despite the fact that we have been pointing all of our contacts, since May 1992, to it all.
  • Visitors, readers and researchers are urged / invited to access and read the letter which the Hon. Secretary of the Litigants In Person Society, Mr. Norman Scarth sent to the founder of human-rights, Mr. Andrew Yiannides, reproduced in the page .org/4deceit.htm* [*L]
  • The author's statements, such as 'what for and why seek additional assistance', thereby spelling out his parts as a lover of it all.
  • Common sense dictates, that he should have directed his request to his partners in deceptions aplenty, one & all engaging in fraudulent misrepresentations AND NOTED TO HAVE, WILFULLY, BEEN SUPPRESSING, FROM THE TAXPAYERS, THE FACTS OF LIFE RELATIVE TO THE RAMPANT ABUSE OF THE COURTS FACILITIES as the failure of all to co-operate as covered and pointed to at:- [*L]. One and all fallen to the facilities for fraud aplenty on the taxpayers and the corruption of illiterates in law, the conditioned victims of the legal circles & courts who fall to the blackmail element attached to the REWARD for keeping the realities away from the taxpayers; just like the media and the Ministers responsible for the application of long existing law to the criminal activities we cover in our pages, do.
  • All the while one and all were / are engaging in the scenarios we cover in the exclusive page, which page the author of the letter which Mr Norman Scarth sent to Andrew Yiannides, afforded us the opportunity to address the issue of the contributions of his partners and affiliates in fraud aplenty on the taxpayers; despite the reminder one and all, named in the new page simply shoved it all in the dark corners of their devoid of grey matter skulls, their perverted / corrupted mind(s)

On Sunday morning, the 19th September 2010, the Deputy Prime Minister, leader of the Liberal-Democrats in the course of the BBC TV politics programme, spoke of the coalition government's commitment to address the element of waste and fraud through the public services sector. We trust and hope that the elements we expose in our pages and the parts adopted by the conditioned victims of the legal circles, the persons who engage in PROMOTING & EXPANDING THE ONGOING CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUD ON THE TAXPAYERS, THROUGH ABUSE OF THE COURTS' FACILITIES, will be on the top of the list of government priorities.
Visitors, readers & researchers are urged to access the letters to Minister Frank Field [*L] after he had been directed by the Prime Minister to think/do the unthinkable.
Link also from here [*L] to the explicit letter to the Home Secretary in December 1998 with submissions arising out of the RAMPANT HOUSING BENEFIT FRAUD
On Tuesday 23rd November 2010, 'the Guardian' in its Comment & Debate page carried an article by Nick Clegg, the Deputy Prime Minister. In the evening of the same day the Deputy Prime Minister addressed a large audience at Kings place in respect of the government's changes on university students fees / loans.
Access from here the page where we reproduce an image of 'the Guardian' article & consider the simple fact that we, alone, have been asserting and proclaiming our objections to the theft of funds from the national budget leading to the ever-increasing annual deficit in the state's balance of payments.

ACCESS:  http://www.justice-uk.human-rights.org/ (For an important message at this Community-on-Line web-site) & thereafter,
Access also http://www.law.society.complaints.and.human-rights.org/ (Judge instigates Fraud On Tax Payers - he knows not the difference between 'imposed' & 'no undue influence'). APOLOGIES FOR THE DISAPPEARANCE OF THIS WEBSITE.It appears that the beneficiary of the work, both for applications to the courts in the United Kingdom and the submissions to the European Court for Human Rights* [*Link from here to the Statement of Facts submitted to the ECoHR], arranged with the providers of the free web space to erase the Intellectual Property of Andrew Yiannides, the founder of the human-rights Community-on-Line, without any reference to the creator of the website and owner of the Intellectual Property!
Ú╝»font> Copyright subsists on all material in our web-site, owned by the authors of same.
Visitors can refer to these pages in any non commercial activity, so long as attribution is given as to source. License to use, for commercial or other specific use of the material, shall have been secured in writing first, from the owners of any property and material from these pages. No material shall be reproduced in any form and by any means without prior agreement and or license in writing from the copyright owners. The Press are invited to contact us if they wish to publish material in the Public Interest, As We Do.
For any problems or questions regarding this web-site contact:  webmaster