h-rtitle.gif (7604 bytes)

Crime - Organised - Institutionalised - Corruption - Fraud - Protection Rackets, run and managed by judicial chair occupants, in a free-for-all state of abundance. Note below the arrangements between the administrative, the judiciary and the media; read of the all-embracing guarantee in place, in contempt of all law : the root shall be pointed to.

WHERE IS JUSTICE? Read below:-

"The court has inherent jurisdiction to stay an action which must fail; as, for instance an action brought in respect of an act of State"

*Link from here to founder's tribulations in 1972-75 and marvel at the creativity of allegedly honourable officers of Justice and the Law in the mother of all PSEUDOdemocracies

  • And by extension any act of any public servant who is appointed, retained and maintained by other public servants for all of whom, the state, as employer, is ultimately responsible, including abusers of judicial chair occupancy. Hence, the billions paid out as covered in the affidavit which visitors can link to directly from here [*Link].
  • Link also from here to the founder's conclusions as of 1972-75 when the great Metropolitan police were seen to be nothing but accessories to and abettors of the rampant fraud and corruption through the courts organised and processed to fruition while Members of Parliament were -as they still do- promoting the waffle that amounts to nothing short of:-

'independence of the judiciary to act in contempt of ALL LAW (national and international) in a pseudo-democracy.

*Link from here to proof of the parts the police play in promotion and expansion of the criminal activities instigated, processed and imposed on society by the legal circles. Read of assertions by a typical hypocrite, none other than the Commissioner of the Metropolitan Police, Sir Robert Mark QPM, when he spoke of FALSE RECORDS / FORGERIES by the legal circles while delivering his famous Dimbleby Lecture on BBC-TV in November 1973, 15 months after he received true copy of THE FORGERY advanced and promoted by the licensed criminals : solicitors and barristers for their evil ends in the case that opened Andrew Yiannides' mental eyes to the realities of life in the United Kingdom, a typical PSEUDOdemocracy. Can anyone enlighten Andrew and the millions of victims of the legal circles WHY NO PROSECUTION of the solicitors & the barristers in 1972 or thereafter?.

  • With such a facility in place (the words we point to above) and arrogant abuse of public office, can anyone assert, or argue, that Mr Andrew Yiannides, the founder of human-rights, was not right to determine that Justice has been abducted and that she is held captive in the dungeons maintained by her abductors who rape her daily in their courts? (>Hence the c reation of www.jusaticeraped.org <)
  • ALL Member States of the European Union are subject to the ruling which visitors, readers and researchers can access in the explicit page /yourrights.htm

*Link from here to the realities - in due course also a link to the warning (indirect but nonetheless very clear) for thinkers to recognise 

  • On 3rd March 2008 >someone's birthday< we released a House of Lords PRECEDENT CASE and reveal deliberations by their Lordships in respect of FRAUD - DECEPTION - CONSPIRACY & IMPLIED LIES BY KEEPING SILENT about any wrong imposed on any other.
  • >>> IN THE MEANTIME we have been naming and shaming a number who know of and engage in much more than just approve wrongs imposed on Mr & Mrs Average, the millions of taxpayers, in our allegedly civilised country / state / province / district of the European Union created by politicians, without reference to the taxed for fraud sucker-serfs, allegedly for the benefit of the citizens from FRAUD & CORRUPTION, among other promotions.

Needless to say the case entailed activities and practices by solicitors as Mr Andrew Yiannides was subjected to, decades later, by an old school friend, Mr Kypros Nichola of Nicholas & Co. in London. Mr K. Nichola bluntly abused the trust placed in him and indulged, in tandem with others, in criminal activities intended to cause the damages that were imposed on the targeted 'serf' by accredited - by the Law Society & Bar Council - allegedly Honourable Officers of the Supreme Court, the courts maintained by successive elected governments in the United Kingdom, one of many pseudodemocracies. In due course another revelation relevant to the arrogant 'inherent jurisdiction', through which to deny, obstruct justice & impose all manner of criminally created states on 'the serfs', who are taxed for the cost of maintaining criminals in public office, in pseudo-democracies.

RESPONSIBLE FOR THE STATE OF AFFAIRS, successive irresponsible Lord Chancellors and Home Secretaries who ignored and ignore all complaints and submissions by victims of the organised crimes we point to and expose in our pages, irrespective of the evidence and the law pointed to, by the victims of it all, the citizens who are called upon to pay taxes for the maintenance of criminals in public office.

[*Link from here to our exclusive page, covering confidential fraud as arranged THROUGH THE BEST KEPT OPEN SECRET in alleged democracies, European States. Elsewhere the foundations and corner stone upon which the operatives built the societies of their making using the bricks and mortar we cover in this and other pages. The visitor should not be under any illusion that the stars in the theatrical productions, covered in our pages were by any stretch of the imagination 'humans' who were / are gifted with any attributes that distinguish 'true humans' (>thinkers<) from animals.

Fraud in court  Council staff use Forgeries   Misconduct in Public Office. 2 cases relative to applicable law One Protocol says it ALL It betrays arrogant intentions Law Provides for THEFTS and it covers Judges too Judges' duties   TIME 4 CHANGE   & CHALLENGES Site CONTENTS - Table of Contents & ongoing work Your Rights & OBLIGATIONS to Society SITE SEARCH facility for any specific element / issue of concern to visitors / readers
COURTS : their Facilities Abused For ORGANISED CRIME : FRAUD Solicitor's Perjury & Victim Ignores it all Just like the Law Society always does Blackmailed or is it Just Conditioned & Subjugated Victims who join the club ? We name Lovers of blunt fraud through courts - Users of the facilities 4 illicit gains Local Authorities & FRAUD on 'serfs' the Taxpayers who are kept in the dark Police Party to & Endorsing Criminal Acts, Activities Arrogant Fraud FALSE Records & Contempt of Law by the legal Circles & Public Services The crafty ones & Vexatious Litigant PLOYS for the rewarded silent

* Information FOR victims who wish to co-operate by EXPOSING & CHALLENGING abusers of Public Office *

family.uk-human-rights justiceraped.org dssfraud.htm confraud.htm dadscare.htm contract.htm converts.htm MensAid
solicitorsfromhell.co.uk chancellor.htm theyknow.htm solfraud.htm sheknows.htm 4deceit.htm convicti.htm forward.htm

December 2006 - SUMMONS ISSUED & SERVED IN RESPECT OF FRAUDULENT & RECKLESSLY IRRESPONSIBLE ACTIVITIES & IMPOSITIONS THROUGH THE FAMILY COURTS

*Link from here to evidence. *Link also from here to a case when the abusers of the courts' facilities abandoned their plans for another targeted family

IMPORTANT INFORMATION for all victims of malpractice - misconduct - negligence, etc. TO NOTE

In the civil justice system in England and Wales, a judge presides over the proceedings that are argued by the opposing sides through the adversarial process. The process enables the court, judge, to reach a conclusion as to the truth of the facts in dispute. Thereat it is for the judge to apply the law to the facts proven, established at court.

The system as evolved is covered in the page 'English Legal System' and remains the same after the Woolf reforms.

An explicit Affidavit [*L] plus exhibits and
     letters to a Chief Inspector of Police
[*L],
          one to solicitors
[*L] and another to the Lord Chancellor [*L] evince
               ORGANISED CRIMES
(Access and read the letter to the police in September 2006 [*L])

Access & read from one of a number of letters to the Prime Minister : * I believe that New Labour will deliver us from the wrongs we have been suffering for far too long. Use of our resources in terms of human potential and capabilities can and should be channelled through rights not wrongs, through positives not through negatives. It is our produce and ingenuity we can sell to others not the minefields of corrupt and bankrupt public services. * [*Link from here to the page, note the steps taken to ensure the Prime Minister forwarded / delegated submissions and evidence received at 10 Downing Street to the right Minister / Ministry because the submissions were in respect of ORGANISED CRIMES

3rd March 2011 added link [*L] to the BBC-TV Dimbleby Lecture in 1973 as the Metropolitan Police Commissioner, Sir Robert Mark prepared & presented to the sucker-serfs

...

This web-site is dedicated to the memory of the the niece of our founder; a fine young lady who was caused to take her  own life because of her father's, and his clan's, cruel attitude to her needs. Read about the circumstances that lead to the tragic loss of that life. Consider that it was all because of GREED. Precisely what our legal system serves for the operatives through ILL legal services care of our legal experts and the modus operandi from within. (access ... /summons.html)

SIX months before taking her own life that fine young lady proclaimed to our founder :- "I can't understand it uncle everyone thinks of bricks mortar and money NO ONE CARES ABOUT PEOPLE".

Page Revised: June 20, 2012.

Note, please that all underlined text with an asterisk indicates a LINK at the bottom of the page


The Frank Cunningham - case (C.A.P)


We draw attention to another true case - reported in the Daily Mirror of May, 29 1997.  Let it be a lesson to all who criticise and ALL who adopt patronising and or 'know-all roles' when they wish to deny, obstruct and VIOLATE RIGHTS in law of the citizens because of other ulterior motives.  We invite those from within the Media, who elect to scorn the LIP (Litigant In Person - often branded Loonies In Person by licensed criminals) to browse this web-site and then let them justify WHY they elect to remain silent and or act as misinformed and prejudiced promoters of the wrongs and  '....the sometimes corrupt.... corrupted justice...'   as the Daily Mirror reasoned on 12 May 1992 when reporting 'the Judith Ward - case'*. Citizens abandoned as Mr Frank Cunningham; citizens denied their rights in law; Justice obstructed by and through the practices of the manipulators, those who abuser the legal system; a system tuned only to and for the greed of the legal 'experts'; the experts who target selected victims in pursuit of their very own ulterior motives and goals, as Mr Geoffrey Scriven deposes*.

The facts of life ARE inherent in the very real case of Frank Cunningham, the victim of the legal experts. He was DENIED LEGAL AID BECAUSE SOLICITORS REFUSED TO REPRESENT HIM.  Social Security fraudsters, securing representation on Legal Aid (refer as to how to Daily Mail issue of 30 June 1997*) because the abusers of our legal system target the owners of private properties as in our Local Authorities pages we expose; do access Housing Scams*; read of those facts of life the United Kingdom.

Legal experts determined that Mr Cunningham's case was hopeless. Mr Cunningham stated in 1997, " There were times when I nearly gave up.  But I carried on and have showed that, if you are not afraid, ordinary people can have a voice. Now I am thinking of doing a law degree".  We publish below the page, from the Daily Mirror, with the article by Paul Byrne. Let the title and the heading be a lighthouse to all battling LIPs whose rights have been denied and violated by the manipulators of a system gone haywire, through the much revered independence of the judiciary and persons who misconduct in public office; particularly those whose priorities are how best to generate income for the circles from within which they arose to judicial chairs; do access and read our fair comment in the injunction application case, 'The Downing Street Years*.

francunr.jpg (169577 bytes)

We have recently been contacted by another 'accident victim'; abandoned by the legal experts for no apparent reason, safe the denial of proper representation against an insurance company that had already admitted liability, as the victim alleged to us; we are presently awaiting for documented evidence to publish on this page.  The need for the public, and the world at large, to recognise the practices within the confines of our judicial theatres is very real.  Blind, deaf and dumb Justice needs help*; manipulated by the experts in the puppet theatres, Justice commands attention.  Another lady recently had her hands tied behind her, as Mr Scarth states in his case*. Forced to fight on his own through inequality of arms with his McKenzie friend gagged, unable to help.

We stated above that the media elect to scorn those who are caused to act as Frank Cunningham had to do.   And in the process evidence related and given to them is ignored; it is shoved in the family closets; no one cares that the closet is bursting open because it can hold no more. Others brush the documented evidence under the carpets and never mind the fact the carpet is ceiling high and no more can be brushed under.  We publish below two damning letters from two upright and honourable  victims of a legal system hell bent to serve only the greed of the legal professions. The two letters were prompted by the article DIY Rampoles.... by Sophie Goodchild published in the Independent on Sunday, as we publish below.  In the article references to G H Scriven and his case.  Mr Scriven has no right of access to the presses of the Independent on  Sunday or any of the other papers who received copies of his affidavits, his Statement of facts and COURT rulings and Orders; such documents must be suppressed by the Media serving the establishment; the citizens are still treated as serfs of the middle ages.  Invariably reporters, their editors and the media barons have only one aim in mind.... and it simply is HOW BEST to preserve the status quo through disinformation and misinformation.  All are attuned to the state of affairs and it suits their purposes, hence they wish not to stir the murky waters.

The latest damning report from the Legal Services Ombudsman* means and indicates nothing to the "Lets keep things as they are" brigade within.  When they ignore the damning evidence, what use supplying them with oil lanterns to go in search of the truth in broad daylight?  Knocking on a deaf person's door is but a wasted effort and exercise; one has to burst in especially if one has to save the very person from fire; like our Justice the person is also blind and cannot see or even feel the fire. OSTRICH ACTS and looking over the fences into the neighbours gardens as the references by Paul Johnson to other countries in the Daily Mail on 6th November 1998*.

Below the Independent on Sunday article on ignores articles the daily Mail published in 'YOU' magazine telling a different story about the citizens forced to act for themselves. For the time we simply point to the Frank Cunningham case above;  we let you, the world Jury to decide about the quality of the Media and the dis-service they provide to the citizens in our alleged Democracy.

diyrumpr.jpg (115113 bytes)

HAVOC Miss Goodchild ?   WHAT ABOUT THE CHANGES in our judicial halls because of their determination to fight all the  way to Strasbourg?  Always following the systematic violations of their rights by the manipulators of our legal system!  Why ignore their successes at Strasbourg against the state that is the second worst offender on Human Rights Violations in Europe?   All thanks to the endemic misconduct in public office by persons who should know 'The Law' but choose to serve other interests instead of Justice. WHY not refer to the FACTS of life as pleaded by Mr G H Scriven* and let the readers of the Independent on Sunday decide?  WHY treat your readers as persons who have  no right to determine for themselves in an alleged Democracy? Why not refer to the Scarth cases all the way to Strasbourg* and the changes in the law and the court practices thanks to his determination? 

Recognise the implications suggested in the title. The authoress knows not of explicit articles over the recent years in other publications. We do not propose to waste our efforts to 'educate the indoctrinated'.   We publish below TWO responses from citizens who were disillusioned by the legal experts and these suffice.  They know of the practices and that the 'milking the cow' is endemic in our legal system; it is the very cornerstone of the professional practices, entertained and instigated  within our judicial halls as of the 'Bleak House' days; we pointed to the practice in our fair comment following the |Court of Appeal ruling in the Downing Street Years Injunction application*, when their Lordships ignored the Copyright Law for the occasion.

We let you decide which of the two responses we publish below never made it to the press. The other was chopped and edited by the manipulators and the experts at misinformation and  dis-information. The media barons and editors serving pre-determined purposes in an alleged Democracy!

The letter below from Mr John R Jeffrey represents his views as a person who has been forced to act by and for himself against the giant Barclays Bank for the last eight years.

joreiosr.jpg (42252 bytes)

The two page letter below is from none other than Mr Norman Scarth. His tribulations have taken him all the way to Strasbourg. You read it;  you decide about the calibre of people scorned by the illiterate of the realities of life in our judicial halls. Miss Goodchild and her editor should consider the implications of the words of Mr Richard Branson after his experiences in the Camelot High Court action in a matter of the libel.  No sooner had he won the case and he proclaimed outside the High Court we believe,  "BEST THEATRE I HAVE BEEN TO". We say no more except that Miss Goodchild should perhaps request of Mr Scarth to send her a transcript or two* of his cases within our courts AFTER ACCESSING AND READING his letter which we publish below, for the benefit of those with open minds, those who wish to be informed of the facts of life in our courts..

page 1 of Mr Scarth's response to the article in the Independent on Sunday

screisr1.jpg (53635 bytes)

page  2 of Mr Scarth's letter in response

screisr2.jpg (43063 bytes)

Links to:  The Judith Ward - case    The Breeding grounds - case     Downing Street

Links to:  Scarth H-P   and cases  Scriven H-P and case   Police Summons the victim

Links to:  "Corrupt Britain" the Paul Johnson references   Social security scams

Link to:    The Legal Services Ombudsman's Report for 1998/99

Page Revised: June 20, 2012.

Copyright subsists on all material on our web-site, owned by the authors of same.

 

The creator of this website was inviting victims to access URrights & join him there with other victims to expose & challenge abusers of trust & public office until the providers of the facilities >ning.com< introduced new terms and conditions for the provision of the facilities. Access from here and read of the imposed states by the brains behind ning.com and consider only one element "WHY OBSTRUCT & HINDER THE DOWNLOAD of the existing material at URrights.ning.com >the intellectual properties of the creator of that presence on the Internet and those who joined him there? Read below of the unacceptable conduct and behaviour by the reckless abusers of trust, who set out to obstruct and blackmail the creator of URrights.ning

Persons who are genuinely concerned and object to the ways they were / are being treated by alleged servants of the publicand the law >in any PSEUDOdemocracy, or whatever states / conditions they are subjected to< by abusers of public facilities and public office >as we cover in our web-pages< should contact webmaster@human-rights.org for information relevant to the creation of similar facilities for INFOrmation on URrights, for facilities for URrights EUrope and for a NETwork of URrights activists.

  • APOLOGIES to friends and persons who could not access URrights following the recent changes by the providers of the facility (ning.com) Andrew Yiannides created and used the portal to create the presence on the Internet for the group of victims / challengers who joined with him to expose and challenge the arrogant and blunt abuse of public services in all allegedly civilised societies > PSEUDODEMOCRACIES <.

  • The changes related to the introduction of charges for the facilities, included the facility for ning.com to archive the material at URrights; also the facility to download the archived material to the creator's system (computer) while the creator and his group of friends considered which of the level of charges and service the group was to adopt.

  • HOWEVER the creator, Andrew Yiannides, WAS UNABLE TO DOWNLOAD THE ARCHIVED MATERIAL and all attempts to engage the providers and their staff in reasonable explanation as to WHY THE FAILURES TO CONNECT / DOWNLOAD from the ning.com servers THE ARCHIVED MATERIAL, were contemptuously ignored.

  • Emails to the Publicity, to the Promotion, to the Public Relations, also to the Chief Executive's Office merited no response whatsoever from anyone acting for ning.com

  • In the circumstances Andrew will appreciate any information related to the problems covered above. Andrew will also appreciate any information relative to exchanges with or email postings, from ning.com to existing members.

  • EXISTING URrights members, victims of the legal system, victims of solicitors and the courts should access the updated pages at .org/solicitors.htm and .org/solfraud.htm by using the links from the list below.

Below pages where we expose known lovers of it all, users and maintenance engineers of the system as is

.org/1999dfax.htm .org/1ofmany.htm .org/2lipstalk.htm .org/4deceit.htm .org/absolute.htm .org/abusers.htm
.org/account4.htm .org/actors.htm .org/actors2.htm .org/adoko.htm .org/bankers.htm .org/beware.htm
.org/blunket1.htm .org/chaldep1.htm .org/confraud.htm .org/contract.htm .org/convicti.htm .org/courts.htm
.org/corruptcourts.htm .org/crimesin.htm .org/dreamers.htm .org/evesused.htm .org/evilones.htm .org/famfraud.htm
.org/govolso.htm .org/guesswhy.htm .org/len.htm .org/mauricek.htm .org/media.htm .org/solfraud.htm
.org/solicitors.htm .org/someplan.htm .org/someploy.htm .org/thefacts.htm .org/theproof.htm .org/thenerve.htm
.org/twisted.htm .org/uaccount.htm .org/ukmm.htm .org/uwatchit.htm .org/watchit1.htm .org/yourtax.htm
  • Every single person we name and expose in the above pages elected to ignore THEIR OBLIGATIONS TO REPORT (to 'the serfs' = 'the taxpayers'), THE ABUSERS OF PUBLIC OFFICE & PUBLIC FACILITIES. All were/are relying on the Intellectual Prostitutes, from within the media, to keep it all in the family closet.
  • All, as typical twin-tongue hypocrites carry on complaining about the media for failing to report & for suppressing the facts and the realities they allegdely reported to the hard of hearing, to the otherwise committed angels blowing their silent trumpets for decades, all ready and gearing to welcome the expansion of the New World Order.
  • Of such parts the contributions from and failings of the persons we name and expose, AS IF THEIR OWN SILENCE, THEIR FAILURES  & THEIR BLUNT OBSTRUCTIONS to the work and other actions by the creator of this website, Andrew Yiannides, treated by one and all as if non-existent with the exception when the wily Norman Scarth, set off to abuse the trust he was allowed to benefit from, while his parts and questionable activities / performance were under scrutiny, specifically after HE FAILED to publish the full transcript of the Court of Appeal hearing HE WAS ALLOWED TO RECORD* [*Link from here to the food for thought page created by Andrew Yiannides, in the first instance].
  • Not one ever bothered to address the issues we expose in the explicit page, despite the fact that we have been pointing all of our contacts, since May 1992, to it all.
  • Visitors, readers and researchers are urged / invited to access and read the letter which the Hon. Secretary of the Litigants In Person Society, Mr. Norman Scarth sent to the founder of human-rights, Mr. Andrew Yiannides, reproduced in the page .org/4deceit.htm* [*L]
  • The author's statements, such as 'what for and why seek additional assistance', thereby spelling out his parts as a lover of it all.
  • Common sense dictates, that he should have directed his request to his partners in deceptions aplenty, one & all engaging in fraudulent misrepresentations AND NOTED TO HAVE, WILFULLY, BEEN SUPPRESSING, FROM THE TAXPAYERS, THE FACTS OF LIFE RELATIVE TO THE RAMPANT ABUSE OF THE COURTS FACILITIES as the failure of all to co-operate as covered and pointed to at:- [*L]. One and all fallen to the facilities for fraud aplenty on the taxpayers and the corruption of illiterates in law, the conditioned victims of the legal circles & courts who fall to the blackmail element attached to the REWARD for keeping the realities away from the taxpayers; just like the media and the Ministers responsible for the application of long existing law to the criminal activities we cover in our pages, do.
  • All the while one and all were / are engaging in the scenarios we cover in the exclusive page, which page the author of the letter which Mr Norman Scarth sent to Andrew Yiannides, afforded us the opportunity to address the issue of the contributions of his partners and affiliates in fraud aplenty on the taxpayers; despite the reminder one and all, named in the new page simply shoved it all in the dark corners of their devoid of grey matter skulls, their perverted / corrupted mind(s)

> MOST IMPORTANT <
On Sunday morning, the 19th September 2010, the Deputy Prime Minister, leader of the Liberal-Democrats in the course of the BBC TV politics programme, spoke of the coalition government's commitment to address the element of waste and fraud through the public services sector. We trust and hope that the elements we expose in our pages and the parts adopted by the conditioned victims of the legal circles, the persons who engage in PROMOTING & EXPANDING THE ONGOING CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUD ON THE TAXPAYERS, THROUGH ABUSE OF THE COURTS' FACILITIES, will be on the top of the list of government priorities.
Visitors, readers & researchers are urged to access the letters to Minister Frank Field [*L] after he had been directed by the Prime Minister to think/do the unthinkable.
Link also from here [*L] to the explicit letter to the Home Secretary in December 1998 with submissions arising out of the RAMPANT HOUSING BENEFIT FRAUD
On Tuesday 23rd November 2010, 'the Guardian' in its Comment & Debate page carried an article by Nick Clegg, the Deputy Prime Minister. In the evening of the same day the Deputy Prime Minister addressed a large audience at Kings place in respect of the government's changes on university students fees / loans.
Access from here the page where we reproduce an image of 'the Guardian' article & consider the simple fact that we, alone, have been asserting and proclaiming our objections to the theft of funds from the national budget leading to the ever-increasing annual deficit in the state's balance of payments.

ACCESS:  http://www.justice-uk.human-rights.org/ (For an important message at this Community-on-Line web-site) & thereafter,
Access also http://www.law.society.complaints.and.human-rights.org/ (Judge instigates Fraud On Tax Payers - he knows not the difference between 'imposed' & 'no undue influence'). APOLOGIES FOR THE DISAPPEARANCE OF THIS WEBSITE.It appears that the beneficiary of the work, both for applications to the courts in the United Kingdom and the submissions to the European Court for Human Rights* [*Link from here to the Statement of Facts submitted to the ECoHR], arranged with the providers of the free web space to erase the Intellectual Property of Andrew Yiannides, the founder of the human-rights Community-on-Line, without any reference to the creator of the website and owner of the Intellectual Property!
Copyright subsists on all material in our web-site, owned by the authors of same.
Visitors can refer to these pages in any non commercial activity, so long as attribution is given as to source. License to use, for commercial or other specific use of the material, shall have been secured in writing first, from the owners of any property and material from these pages. No material shall be reproduced in any form and by any means without prior agreement and or license in writing from the copyright owners. The Press are invited to contact us if they wish to publish material in the Public Interest, As We Do.
For any problems or questions regarding this web-site contact:  webmaster
...