h-rtitle.gif (7604 bytes)

Crime - Organised - Institutionalised - Corruption - Fraud - Protection Rackets, run and managed by judicial chair occupants, in a free-for-all state of abundance. Note below the arrangements between the administrative, the judiciary and the media; read of the all-embracing guarantee in place, in contempt of all law : the root shall be pointed to.

WHERE IS JUSTICE? Read below:-

"The court has inherent jurisdiction to stay an action which must fail; as, for instance an action brought in respect of an act of State"

*Link from here to founder's tribulations in 1972-75 and marvel at the creativity of allegedly honourable officers of Justice and the Law in the mother of all PSEUDOdemocracies

  • And by extension any act of any public servant who is appointed, retained and maintained by other public servants for all of whom, the state, as employer, is ultimately responsible, including abusers of judicial chair occupancy. Hence, the billions paid out as covered in the affidavit which visitors can link to directly from here [*Link].
  • Link also from here to the founder's conclusions as of 1972-75 when the great Metropolitan police were seen to be nothing but accessories to and abettors of the rampant fraud and corruption through the courts organised and processed to fruition while Members of Parliament were -as they still do- promoting the waffle that amounts to nothing short of:-

'independence of the judiciary to act in contempt of ALL LAW (national and international) in a pseudo-democracy.

*Link from here to proof of the parts the police play in promotion and expansion of the criminal activities instigated, processed and imposed on society by the legal circles. Read of assertions by a typical hypocrite, none other than the Commissioner of the Metropolitan Police, Sir Robert Mark QPM, when he spoke of FALSE RECORDS / FORGERIES by the legal circles while delivering his famous Dimbleby Lecture on BBC-TV in November 1973, 15 months after he received true copy of THE FORGERY advanced and promoted by the licensed criminals : solicitors and barristers for their evil ends in the case that opened Andrew Yiannides' mental eyes to the realities of life in the United Kingdom, a typical PSEUDOdemocracy. Can anyone enlighten Andrew and the millions of victims of the legal circles WHY NO PROSECUTION of the solicitors & the barristers in 1972 or thereafter?.

  • With such a facility in place (the words we point to above) and arrogant abuse of public office, can anyone assert, or argue, that Mr Andrew Yiannides, the founder of human-rights, was not right to determine that Justice has been abducted and that she is held captive in the dungeons maintained by her abductors who rape her daily in their courts? (>Hence the c reation of www.jusaticeraped.org <)
  • ALL Member States of the European Union are subject to the ruling which visitors, readers and researchers can access in the explicit page /yourrights.htm

*Link from here to the realities - in due course also a link to the warning (indirect but nonetheless very clear) for thinkers to recognise 

  • On 3rd March 2008 >someone's birthday< we released a House of Lords PRECEDENT CASE and reveal deliberations by their Lordships in respect of FRAUD - DECEPTION - CONSPIRACY & IMPLIED LIES BY KEEPING SILENT about any wrong imposed on any other.
  • >>> IN THE MEANTIME we have been naming and shaming a number who know of and engage in much more than just approve wrongs imposed on Mr & Mrs Average, the millions of taxpayers, in our allegedly civilised country / state / province / district of the European Union created by politicians, without reference to the taxed for fraud sucker-serfs, allegedly for the benefit of the citizens from FRAUD & CORRUPTION, among other promotions.

Needless to say the case entailed activities and practices by solicitors as Mr Andrew Yiannides was subjected to, decades later, by an old school friend, Mr Kypros Nichola of Nicholas & Co. in London. Mr K. Nichola bluntly abused the trust placed in him and indulged, in tandem with others, in criminal activities intended to cause the damages that were imposed on the targeted 'serf' by accredited - by the Law Society & Bar Council - allegedly Honourable Officers of the Supreme Court, the courts maintained by successive elected governments in the United Kingdom, one of many pseudodemocracies. In due course another revelation relevant to the arrogant 'inherent jurisdiction', through which to deny, obstruct justice & impose all manner of criminally created states on 'the serfs', who are taxed for the cost of maintaining criminals in public office, in pseudo-democracies.

RESPONSIBLE FOR THE STATE OF AFFAIRS, successive irresponsible Lord Chancellors and Home Secretaries who ignored and ignore all complaints and submissions by victims of the organised crimes we point to and expose in our pages, irrespective of the evidence and the law pointed to, by the victims of it all, the citizens who are called upon to pay taxes for the maintenance of criminals in public office.

[*Link from here to our exclusive page, covering confidential fraud as arranged THROUGH THE BEST KEPT OPEN SECRET in alleged democracies, European States. Elsewhere the foundations and corner stone upon which the operatives built the societies of their making using the bricks and mortar we cover in this and other pages. The visitor should not be under any illusion that the stars in the theatrical productions, covered in our pages were by any stretch of the imagination 'humans' who were / are gifted with any attributes that distinguish 'true humans' (>thinkers<) from animals.

Fraud in court  Council staff use Forgeries   Misconduct in Public Office. 2 cases relative to applicable law One Protocol says it ALL It betrays arrogant intentions Law Provides for THEFTS and it covers Judges too Judges' duties   TIME 4 CHANGE   & CHALLENGES Site CONTENTS - Table of Contents & ongoing work Your Rights & OBLIGATIONS to Society SITE SEARCH facility for any specific element / issue of concern to visitors / readers
COURTS : their Facilities Abused For ORGANISED CRIME : FRAUD Solicitor's Perjury & Victim Ignores it all Just like the Law Society always does Blackmailed or is it Just Conditioned & Subjugated Victims who join the club ? We name Lovers of blunt fraud through courts - Users of the facilities 4 illicit gains Local Authorities & FRAUD on 'serfs' the Taxpayers who are kept in the dark Police Party to & Endorsing Criminal Acts, Activities Arrogant Fraud FALSE Records & Contempt of Law by the legal Circles & Public Services The crafty ones & Vexatious Litigant PLOYS for the rewarded silent

* Information FOR victims who wish to co-operate by EXPOSING & CHALLENGING abusers of Public Office *

family.uk-human-rights justiceraped.org dssfraud.htm confraud.htm dadscare.htm contract.htm converts.htm MensAid
solicitorsfromhell.co.uk chancellor.htm theyknow.htm solfraud.htm sheknows.htm 4deceit.htm convicti.htm forward.htm


*Link from here to evidence. *Link also from here to a case when the abusers of the courts' facilities abandoned their plans for another targeted family

IMPORTANT INFORMATION for all victims of malpractice - misconduct - negligence, etc. TO NOTE

In the civil justice system in England and Wales, a judge presides over the proceedings that are argued by the opposing sides through the adversarial process. The process enables the court, judge, to reach a conclusion as to the truth of the facts in dispute. Thereat it is for the judge to apply the law to the facts proven, established at court.

The system as evolved is covered in the page 'English Legal System' and remains the same after the Woolf reforms.

An explicit Affidavit [*L] plus exhibits and
     letters to a Chief Inspector of Police
          one to solicitors
[*L] and another to the Lord Chancellor [*L] evince
               ORGANISED CRIMES
(Access and read the letter to the police in September 2006 [*L])

Access & read from one of a number of letters to the Prime Minister : * I believe that New Labour will deliver us from the wrongs we have been suffering for far too long. Use of our resources in terms of human potential and capabilities can and should be channelled through rights not wrongs, through positives not through negatives. It is our produce and ingenuity we can sell to others not the minefields of corrupt and bankrupt public services. * [*Link from here to the page, note the steps taken to ensure the Prime Minister forwarded / delegated submissions and evidence received at 10 Downing Street to the right Minister / Ministry because the submissions were in respect of ORGANISED CRIMES

3rd March 2011 added link [*L] to the BBC-TV Dimbleby Lecture in 1973 as the Metropolitan Police Commissioner, Sir Robert Mark prepared & presented to the sucker-serfs


Access the extract from Isocrates' * Aeropagiticos *[*L] -in our quotes page- among other more gems from dignitaries

forward.htm            KEY
PageChanges 24 Oct. 2003
The Way FORWARD (for thinkers - humans) *Page Created December 1999*

hrbnrsml.gif (1162 bytes) JOIN

others on Line. State Facts, Publish the Evidence In Your Case and work with others for THE 'Common Cause'. Access clearly stated facts and realities we settled & submitted to the European Court of Human Rights, for a member. Note and use* [*L] links from facts you state on line, similar ities in your own marathon runs through the theatres they dare refer to as Justice Halls and courts of law. (*Link, to the Community On Line victim's web-pages).

Euro Convention Rights
Article 6.1 Court Hearings
Article 6.2 Court Hearings
Article 6.3 Court Hearings
Article 8.1 Respect 4 Family
Article 8.2 Family Rights
Article 9  Free TO THINK +++
Article 10 Free to Share Info
Article 11 Free Join Assemble Article 14 No Discrimination

KEY to Page & Site
News ARTICLES - Page List
LAW  Convention Rights
LAW European Union Rights
This PAGE - QUOTES - List
This  SITE - PAGES - List
OTHER SITES - Short List

Page - ARTICLES - List
1. The Times 1997 4 Thinkers
2. The Sun - Met. Comm 2002
3. Law Society Guilty - Deceit
Site NEWS Articles - List
1. David Blunkett & Judges 
2. D. Mail Free For All 2001
3. Global Role For Britain
4. Blair-Brown Rift On TAX?
5. 12.3 Billion Compensation
6. Brave(!) Sir J Steven QPM
7. Ministers Police & FRAUD
8. EU - Institutionalised Fraud
9. part x
Page ITEMS Covered-List
1. No Rift Over Tax In Govern
2. Last Year & Now, CRIMES
3. Global Role 4 Britain - PM.
4. Norman Acts Deceitfully
5. The National Scandal 
6. OSS Acted- Solicitor Fined
7. Media IGNORE U-R Rights
8. Norman Records at CoA
9. Police Summons A VICTIM
10. Solicitor Admitted FRAUD
Site Letters TO - List
1. April 2003 Frank Field MP
2. Dec. 1998 Home Secretary
3. Dec. 1999 Prime Minister
4. May 2000 Hackney Council
5.Jun. 2001 Haringey Council
6. Feb. 2002 The Treasury
7. Feb. 2002 Home Secretary
8. Feb. 2002 Prime Minister
9. Mar. 2002 Lon. Ev Standard
10. Mar. 2003 Law Society++
11 Jul.2003 Work&Pens Minis
12 Jul. 2003 Hackney Council
13  August 2003 ECourtHR
14. Victim Suppressing Facts
Site Letters FROM - List
1. Part- SOLICITOR To Client
2. Prime Minister Nov. 1999
3. CEO Haringey Council 2001
4. Haringey Council Dreamer
5. Police Promoting Just LIES 
6. Norman Seeks Information
7. LCD Expose Police LIES
8. An Illiterate L.C. Dpt. Officer
9. ECourtHR September 2003
10. No D-Notices Do PUBLISH
11. Lord Irvine to G Brady MP
Page NEWS Articles - List
1. The Times - PLATO
Page & Site IMAGES - List
1. LES - D Blunkett & Judges 
2. OSS Flood of Complaints
3. Suppresser's 3page Letter
4. Fraud 4 Invisible Refugees
5. 4 Billion by Welfare Cheats
6. 60 Million Legal Aid Cheats
7. 800 Million Soc. Sec Fraud
8. Cowboy Lawyers & LCD
9.  DIY Havoc In The Courts
10.Pensioner Sues PM Blair 
11. Lord Paul On Family State
12. Corrupt Regime Defeated
13. Extra Funds For Haringey
14. Police Manufacture LIES
15. Case of Scandalising ?
16. No Stars For Haringey 
17. Lawyer Flees With 6 Million
18. Benefit Scam End In Jail
19. Hoffman Fiasco & 1 Million
20. Judges Condemn Minister Lilley
21. Lawyers Appalling Service
22. Loophole Rogue Lawyer
23. Letter to Prime Minister
24. MPs And 4 Billion FRAUD
25. Police Exposed As LIARS
26. Complains Again Soli Rise
27. Public 2 Help Choose Judges
Relevant Quotes In Page
1. part x
Page  ISSUES - List
1. Psychiatry or Philosophy ?
The PRESS RELEASE / news headline below suffices. The government was caused to release the realities covered in the article on 27/08/2002in270802.jpg (82095 bytes)
The above article MUST BE READ BY ALL law abiding and conscientious 'serfs'. All pay taxes FOR the organised FRAUD VIA THE COURTS & the legal system. CRIMES that ARE ORGANISED by Public(!) Servants(?) as covered we cover in our pages [*Link]
The Daily Telegraph on 2nd August 2002 came up with, "Scandals in Europe are in the Public Sector'. We know the government is acting as promised in 1995 and that many of the charlatans and FRAUDSTERS' club recruits who made it their business to interfere (because of the interests they wished to preserve) will also come to recognise that 'THE LAW IS NO ASS', as they indicated through their activities in the background.dt20802f.gif (155989 bytes)
The FRAUDSTERS CLUB recruits are covered in our exclusive page* [*L]. We publish some details from the case we had the opportunity to work on, after an alleged victim was introduced to us with other plans in mind for herself and for us. We recognised from the onset what she was up to. She had been introduced by the LIPS crowd/mob after all. WE HAD TO BE ALERT and kept casting our nets, while she thought she was a cat playing with a mouse. (*Link to the case introduction and look forward to exposures of her part in the DOUBLE Fraud on ALL tax paying 'serfs').



Andrew apologises to friends who joined him for the common cause at urrights.ning.com as concerned victims, for the developments after www.ning.com introduced NEW terms for the provision of the facility. Andrew was informed that the existing material on line could be downloaded BUT the facility WAS OBSTRUCTED by the very people ning.com NOTE PLEASE that URrights as a domain had evidently been  registered by 'unknown' as a DOT COM domain LET common sense determine as to who & above all WHY?


Andrew apologises to friends who joined him for the common cause at urrights.ning.com as concerned victims, for the developments after www.ning.com introduced NEW terms for the provision of the facility. Andrew was informed that the existing material on line could be downloaded BUT the facility WAS OBSTRUCTED by the very people ning.com NOTE PLEASE that URrights as a domain had evidently been  registered by 'unknown' as a DOT COM domain LET common sense determine as to who & above all WHY?




undercon.gif (286 bytes)

Page Revised: June 20, 2012
Site under reconstruction for better navigation and access to . 

VISITORS ARE URGED to access and READ THE IMPORTANT update and ADDENDA we were obliged to introduce in January 2002. We had no choice but to REPORT THE CRIMES TO THE TREASURY. Our observations and knowledge of the constructive frauds made us accessories if we kept quiet, like the alleged victims who worked towards the implementation of the schemes created and used by the abductors and rapists of Justice, the Goddess. You will find the addenda statement at the top of the Updated Pages File. We are sure that you will share with us our concerns and most profound disappointment at and with persons who adopt and promote activities which they know are nothing but downright crimes. We refer to our exclusive page where we expose (as conscientious law abiding citizens) the Confidentiality Between Fraudsters that exists care of the BEST OPEN SECRET we expose in the exclusive page.

We emphasise the fact that the scheme could not possibly be maintained without the readiness of maintenance engineers. We refer to persons whose attitude to the law is controlled by their greed and mentality as stooges who operate out of beehives such as the LIPS crowd/mob and their affiliates, associates who operate out of similar *fraudsters club recruits* centres and set-ups.


So declares a professor of philosophy in the USA, Dr. Louis Marinoff. We were not surprised to read of the re-discovery of the most basic of principles for serenity and tranquillity in human relations, as for purely personal aims and achievement. That principle entails the concept that for 'humans' (non sexist word) to progress and to achieve personal satisfaction, the human MUST think before acting, reacting and or promoting some other's idea or project. The afore-stated always within the other indivisible concept that stipulates 'one's actions and or words must not, in any way, infringe upon the peace of mind and the rights or freedoms of any other'.

Reading through the article for the first time back in 1997 we could not but wonder: "Why has it taken so long for anyone to consider 'the human element' before the biological, the animal"?

We reproduce the article below in hyper-text (HTML) for possible links to and from. We trust that it can assist our visitors to, and readers of, this page to recognise the soundness of the reasoning behind the promotions by Dr. Marinoff and his colleagues.

Guidelines on Navigating through the extensive material: access instructions.  The request of visitors who wish to acquaint themselves with the extensive material at the site, to use the SEARCH FOR facility. Just type in any word or combination of words / issues that are of concern / interest - and they need information and or our views about. Remember that our views rest on factual experiences and research with evidence in support. We urge visitors and in particular to genuine victims of the legal circles and the Law Enforcement Agencies to access the introduction page to the Community on Line (* Link).

As part of the reconstruction process our new pages and pages where changes and additions have been implemented, the improved / amended pages are endorsed with the link 'Page Changes and the date of the last changes. The link takes visitors to a List of the changes implemented in the page. These include new material and links from relevant paragraphs to other or new relevant

For further clarification email: webmaster@

Developments the conditioned and indoctrinated should awake to

The article in 'The TIMES' of 28th October 1997 spells out the most important element for anyone concerned  about the state of humanity in our days. The genuine, the concerned and those who do not wish to be just used as 'serfs' (we write about) or as the 'subjects' (to the whims of the corrupters, the corrupt and the corrupted) should take counsel from the article.

plato97f.jpg (101802 bytes)
Read below the text in HTML


The way forward is Plato, not Prozac.

Americans are abandoning psychiatrists and turning to philosophers to solve the problems of modern life.

Tunku Varadarajan reports

It is all too good to be true, right down to the last hair on his bushy philosopher's beard. Louis Marinoff even looks like a Socrates of the Upper West Side, the Ancient Greek sage come back to earth as a 'fin de siecle' New Yorker.

Dr Marinoff, a Professor of Philosophy at the City College of New York, has just tumbled out of a taxi and into my messy office on Manhattan's Sixth Avenue. He is bubbling with opinions, bursting with words, dying to tell me all about the things he does. "We're in the vanguard," he says, a touch immodestly.

I have before me a real, live "philosophical counsellor", one of a small (but growing) band of men and women who think that modern man, over-reliant on psychiatry, really needs philosophy to solve his deepest problems. Plato, not Prozac, is the way forward. Put Freud to one side for a moment, with all that stuff about castration complexes, and ponder awhile on Hobbes, Locke and Kierkegaard. Sprinkle your life, even, with some zesty ontology from Heidegger, and you will taste the difference.

Philosophical counselling is setting out to make psychiatrists obsolete. The movement is, as Dr Marinoff explains, "designed to address the predicaments of the average person through philosophical means, rather than psychological ones". It began with Gerd Achenbach, who opened the first philosophical counselling practice in Bergisch Gladbach near Cologne, in 1981. A year later Dr Achenbach founded the Association for Philosophical Practice, which he still heads.

Dr Marinoff is "one of Achenbach's boys". In 1994 to little attention in the press, he co-organised the first International Conference on Philosophical Counselling, in Vancouver, which proved to be the trampoline from which this audacious movement has since soared higher and higher.

So high in fact that psychiatrists, now a perturbed bunch, have begun to stick in the professional knife. In a public statement recently, philosophical counsellors were described as "harmful" by a former president of the American Psychological Association.

But Dr Marinoff is blithe, even cocky, about his movement's prospects. "Look, if there's a product you can sell and people want it, then there will be those who will sell it. Philosophical counselling is a bit like heroin in that sense. But it's neither costly, nor addictive. In fact, it's utterly beneficial."

What does a philosophical counsellor actually do? According to the introductory chapter of Essays on Philosophical Counselling, the movement's bible, the counsellor is a philosopher who receives clients and discusses with them their personal problems and predicaments".

These range from general feelings of meaninglessness and a desire for better self-understanding to specific problems such as divorce, suicidal tendencies and job dissatisfaction - in fact, most of the neo-pathological problems commonly treated by therapists.

Psychiatrists according to Dr Marinoff, "are increasingly writing prescriptions for people who really need discussion and debate. Much of today's therapy is 'nothing but neural pharmacology'. He says: "It is not necessarily the case that all symptoms patients show may be treated by drugs. If someone's struggling with a moral or ethical problem, then the root cause may be inaccessible to medicine.'

To illustrate this point Dr Marinoff cites the case of a man examined by his colleague Ben Mijuskovic, a Californian philosophical counsellor. Dr Mijuskovic saw a man who had become a monk when he was only 17. He was now 37, and was experiencing symptoms of major depression - fatigue, sleeping problems, feelings of hopelessness, helplessness and 'suicidal ideation'. During the course of philosophical counselling, it became increasingly clear that his problems were not the result of latent childhood or adolescent traumas - as therapists might have readily assumed - but rather the result of a painful awareness that he had spent two decades of his life committed to monastic ways.

These included helping strangers, but excluded sexual intimacy and the formation of a "biological family" to which he could belong. The sadness of his dilemma clearly troubled him deeply, but it would be wrong to say that this was a psychiatric issue, which could be addressed by medication and an endless replaying of his emotional past. It was not.

As the sessions progressed, it became clear that he had to make a decision reaffirming his original choice or "striking out freely and anxiously towards a new life". According to a philosophical counsellor the monk's crisis was religious and intellectual. It had nothing to do with a psychotherapists couch".

In any case, a philosophical Counsellor's time is cheaper. Unlike top psychiatrists who charge you "hundreds of dollars per session", Dr Marinoff charges $100 an hour to treat you with Kant, Wingerstein or the Epicureans.

I asked him for a concrete match of philosopher to problem, and he gave me the example of a man who came to see him recently. "An ordinary sort of Joe from Wall Street with money brains and confidence, but whose foundations were shaken when he discovered that his wife was having an affair.

"My wife has been seeing someone else", the man told Dr Marinoff. "I'm unhappy. I'm contemplating divorce. What should I do?" This is a "textbook case" of one who needs a philosopher's armchair, not a psychiatrist's expensive couch. Philosophical counsellors offer a "process of questioning, not of finding answers". Dr Marinoff helps such people "to walk their wit".

He explains: "When this man came to me and said "What should I do? I threw the question back at him: "What would you like to do? Presumably you don't want her to commit adultery any more. Do you want to preserve the marriage?" He did, so we worked with certain philosophers, like Kant, who talks about the principles of forgiveness and compassion, as well as the ethics of duty."

If the man does not want to save the marriage, and is looking for a way out of a rotten union, Dr Marinoff might mischievously, suggest a reading of Shakespeare. "There are a lot of things in his oeuvre that don't flatter the constancy of women. Or he could even read Ecclesiastics".

Philosophical counsellors, abhor "the sexual presupposition of psychotherapy". Dr Marinoff says: "Freud supposed that the roots of all our problems are sexual". This is patently false, which is why his disciples - Reich. Adler, Riviere. Jung - all broke away from him. None of them touches upon the fundamental human problem because there isn't one fundamental human problem. You can't take people, as Freud did, and shoehorn tern all into a condition. We don't do that".

Dr Marinoff says people will turn increasingly to philosophical counsellors as the realisation grows that psychiatric methods "have failed" and that they offer the wrong tools for the wrong job". "You could have the best collection of screwdrivers in the world, but what use are they if you have to hammer a nail"? I already have a number of refugees from psychiatry and psychotherapy. Philosophical counsellors are not like the couch brigade. Half of them invent syndromes, and the other half conduct experiments to affirm these imaginings. If you have a problem come to us first. Don't go to them."

© The Times - News International - UK

We dedicate the above article to: -

  • To the non-thinkers,
  • To the stooges,
  • To the charlatans,
  • To the sold souls,
  • To those who converted and convert to and adopt the New World Order Code of Ehics & Morals for the free-for-all society.
  • To the vile (anagram of evil) and maligned ways of their scheming tutors through and FOR purely selfish and 'personal fraudulent gains' at the expense of the taxpayers, as covered in the page* [*L] ALL BURIED IN THE SAND WITH THEIR DEVOID OF ETHICS & MORALS EMPTY SKULLS.
  • To the greedy 'for greens and power over the targeted', but always at the expense of 'many others' the taxpaying 'sucker-serfs'.
  • To those who so indulge, especially when they know that they do so at high cost to society at large - to the taxpayers with much more than simply financial gains for and by the criminally motivated and 'the selfish converts to the system as is'.
  • To those who suffer from self imposed mental blindness, self-imposed mental deafness, and self-imposed silence : as mentally dumb as they come morons and conditioned zombies.
  • To those who act as above either because of their love of and for the evil ways they adopted, as products of ther creators of the New World Order Code of Ethics & Morals or purely because they themselves never had any regard for any law and the rights of any other (especially those they treat as 'shitizens') when emulating those they were/are complaining about as lousy actors & poor specimens of alleged 'humans'.
  • To those who joined 'the fraudsters club', which we cover in a page where we relate the conniving ways of the Honorary Secretary of one such club, the LIPS crowd/mob* [*L]. In the page we cover the double fraud on the taxpayers as arranged by the managers, the organisers and the controllers of CIUKU (Crimes Incorporated United Kingdom Unlimited - Enterprises).
  • To those who embraced and embrace, the arrangements in place and simply act as the perpetual Hypocrites and Sycophants that abound everywhere in the modern societies created and nurtured by the criminals who are and have been in control of their creations, the pseudo-democracies we have been writing of and about.

For the root, the foundations and the corner stone upon which the societies we cover above you are requested to access and read the material at:

There you will be accessing material that has long been shoved under the carpets of the salons where the self styled wise ones* [*L], the 'self appointed and the self-promoted as alleged upstanding human' specimens* [*L] of  the communities they create, frequent.

Many the 'victims who shove it all in the dark corners of their minds, allege, assert and promote in private circles much about the abductors and rapists of Justice. The very 'hypocrites' also IGNORE THEIR DUTIES TO REPORT THE CRIMES THEY SPEAK OF INCESSANTLY, where it counts; especially so, after being ignored (as they love to promote) by the police, their Member of Parliament and even the stooges acting (in the full sense of the theatrical connotation) as reporters / journalists, but as retained Intellectual Prostitutes!

The very charlatans promoting also 'their personal views' about this, that and the other, expecting others to join in the promotion and support of 'their personal views'. The carft and wily, (with the exception of a few) failing to express and or promote 'their personal views' OPENLY. Such persons persistently fail to act, as invited & challenged, even after being offered assistance to PUBLISH 'their personal views' ON THE INTERNET, WITH ANY EVIDENCE OR LEGAL ARGUMENT founded and resting on events, activities or defaults and omission* [*L] that gave/give rise to their assertions / allegations inted for & used qualify their own conclusions. (*FXXXXXX)

The conclusions, as published at the above web-site, were arrived at, over four decades ago by the founder of the Non Governmental Organisation *human-rights*. Andrew, who is also the inspiration and creator of the Community On line had been given reasonable grounds to 'seek and find the truth behind inexplicable events', such as those recorded and maintained for thousands of years for 'humans' (thinkers?) to be reading of and about, as you will be assisted to 'grasp' at the above site. A short introduction to historical events can be accessed at this site in the page *Humanity Raped* /humraped.htm where historical events should prompt *thinkers8 into further action.

Many the charlatans and stooges who shoved and shove their empty heads in the sand as the proverbial ostriches. In so far as they are concerned the following pages, at this web-site, do not exist:

  • http://www.human-rights.demon.co.uk/confraud.htm (*Link changed to this site)
    There you will be reading of persons who embrace and adopt the arrangements in place, whereby public servants are free to indulge in constructive frauds. You will be reading of the compensation arrangements, UNDER THE TABLE, after public servants steal and plunder the assets of the 'serfs' (you, their masters), whom the public(!) servants(?) treat as 'subjects' (the older 'serfs' can recognise the implication) to their corrupt and fraudulent ways. You will be reading of how after the creators, whose assets the public servants plundered with others, at will, and with plenty of false instruments which public(!) servants(?) generate/create in the process, are invited to enter into secret deals with the criminals who abuse their positions and misconduct in public office. THUS THE 'serfs' consciously lend themselves to accessories and abettors of TWO SETS OF FRAUD on the budget, the taxpayers.
  • http://www.human-rights.demon.co.uk/blunket1.htm (*Link changed to this site)
    There you will be reading of how after we reported and made submissions to the government, in February 2002, about such a scenario as covered in the above page there followed a Press Release whereby the Home Secretary, the Chief Executive of the Serious Fraud Office, Senior city police officers and other Ministers were expressing concerns about the issue of White Collar Fraud. 
  • http://www.human-rights.demon.co.uk/theyknow.htm (*Link changed to this site)
    Where you can access the communications and submissions to government, called for, in January / February 2002, (after the last piece in the jigsaw puzzle fell in place) in the case of the stooge who was part and parcel to the TWO CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUDS that we cover in the first page above. The alleged victim was a very conscious participant to the very frauds. She ha been in a double mission for well over a year. The first appeared to have been, initially and from the onset when the 'alleged' victim was introduced to Andrew and human-rights by the LIPS crowd/mob; that mission / retainer recognised as one intended to test the knowledge and patience of Andrew, while securing support that would be 'putting pressure on the authorities' because of her implied intentions to publish it all on the Internet, as a member of the Community On Line. At the same time not to act so, for it would jeopardise the under the table settlement' that SHE WAS WORKING FOR, as a participant in the scheme. We were and are familiar with the scenario; what all stooges and charlatans overlook is that in law 'the pre-arranged participation on such conditions' in themselves constitutes BLACKMAIL BY THE CRIMINALS AND AN AGREED CONSPIRACY FOR BLUNT FRAUDS AND CORRUPTION THROUGH MISCONDUCT IN PUBLIC OFFICE AND MALADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE SYSTEM and the tax revenue..
  • http://www.human-rights.demon.co.uk/chaldep1.htm (*Link changed to the page at this site)
    At the page you will be reading of and accessing the first part of the challenges that expose both the alleged victim and 'a solicitor'. The solicitor was representing the solicitors who had set the ball rolling in and FOR THE FIRST PHASE OF THE CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUDS through abuse of the courts' processes, and facilities at the disposal of criminals. The alleged victim did her best to keep it all under wraps and in the dark corners of her own perverted mind and her attitude towards Parliament's law. Throughout the months that Andrew had been assisting her, she was actually indulging in many an activity bluntly intended to obstruct her own rights in law and at court, and on occasions also consciously and deliberately obstructing or agreeing to the obstructions by judicial chair occupants who objected to Andrew to assist and speak for her. It should be noted that whenever he had done so, on those occasions the bench (judicial chair occupants) had no choice but not to ignore her rights nor act in contempt of applicable law or the evidence before the court. Many the victims who speak of blunt denials of rights when a targeted victim appears before any abuser of judicial chair occupancy and many the charlatans who simply ignore their rights in law while behaving as the stooge on a mission as in the case at hand.
  • http://www.human-rights.demon.co.uk/sunmar07.htm (*Link changed to the page at this site)
    The page was created after an interesting article covering the outspoken views of the Metropolitan Police Commissioner, Sir Steven James, on the justice system was published in 'The Sun' newspaper on 7th March 2002. The article immediately after we delivered our views to the victim, in the above page, because of her attitude and promotion of stale excuses and crap for failing to work with us and for defaulting to publish the facts of life in her situation, on the Internet. That was, after all, the agreement from the onset. It was the only reason and purpose for affording assistance to the victim, as far as the agreement between the 'victim' and *human-rights* was concerned. Andrew, however, had other reasons for assisting and working with the 'victim' while she was indulging as a cat who was of opinion that she was playing with a mouse. Access the page and read of the fair comment that applied in the case of the courageous and 'brave, statement by the Met's top copper'.
  • http://www.human-rights.demon.co.uk/office.htm (*Link changed to the page at this site)
    The page is A MUST FOR EVERYONE WHETHER a victim of the TRIAD or not; also for all who are genuinely concerned with the state of affairs, the impositions and the fraudulent practices through the Law Enforcement Agencies : the police and the courts. You will be accessing an exclusive letter that was sent to the Rt. Hon. Frank Field MP, ex Minister in late April 2003. You should read it all and access the parts of the pages that the links, in the letter, pointed the Member of Parliament to. THEN & ONLY THEN you will be in a position to appreciate the full and true value of the article by the Home Secretary, David Blunkett that was published in the London Evening Standard, within a week, or so, of the letter reaching the MP. One only has to consider the heading under which the letter was submitted to the MP, in order to recognise why constitutional issues were raised by the Home Secretary in his article in reference to the position of ELECTED MEMBERS OF GOVERNMENT IN A DEMOCRATIC STATE and the position of the judges, as administrators of the law. The reader/visitor who recognises the aforesaid should access the fourth quote in the HomePage (*Link) at this site.

YET we have the very charlatans, stooges and 'fraudsters club recruits and hopefuls', wishing to play at law (like the expert who was being discussed by the two LIPS in conversation in the exclusive page below:

  • http://www.human-rights.demon.co.uk/2lipstalk.htm (*Link changed to the page at this site)
    Persons who wish to benefit from information on the elements and THE ACTIVITIES IN THE BACKGROUND, the realities that are suppressed and not spoken of or pointed to, by such persons as the two in recorded telephone exchanges (in te page linked to from here, NEED TO EXERCISE patience and   promoting should acces the above page and benefit from the subsists really interested in the background

Visitors / readers are requested to access and acquaint themselves with the material facts covered in the above pages and to further their grasp of the long ongoing constructive frauds through abuse of the courts facilities and public services to alleged he following pages, in the order listed below:

Link to:  Scriven Home Page   Scarth Records at CoA   Police Summons The Victim
Link to:  CAMILA Stephen Lawrence Inquiry submissions Acknowledged   No D-A Notices - confirmed - official
Link to:  The Police Complaints Authority  The MEDIA HYPOCRITES : the facts from the horse's mouth
Link to:  Housing Benefit   ARROGANT FRAUD:  the Facts deposed of in a succinct AFFIDAVIT  
Link to:  Housing Benefit Demands [*L] for alleged Overpayments Challenged as Fraud & Demands Withdrawn+
Link to:  Housing Benefit Scam & Constructive Frauds Through the Courts - EXPLICIT APPEAL

Revised: June 20, 2012.


Footnote eXtra: In October 2010, the coalition's Attorney General, in an interview published by 'COUNSEL' specifically spoke of the police distancing themselves from cases of (small-fry) fraud and asserted that he was making that element his department's priority. IT REMAINS TO BE SEEN, WHAT the coalition of the Con-LibDems, THE GOVERNMENT OF THE DAY, WILL IN FACT ATTEND TO THE RAMPANT FRAUD. IF IT WILL DEAL APPROPRIATELY with the criminals who abuse public office, especially when faced with appropriate submissions and claims that will be delivered in due course. Visitors/readers are urged to read the article published in the London Evening Standard, as settled by the Rt. Hon. David Blunkett, Home Secretary in 2003 [*Link from here to the article we reproduce in another webpage and consider "Why tolerate the arrogance of the legal circles who had and have the audacity to assert to the lawmakers that the lawmakers have nothing to do with the law"]. While there, above it, the explicit letter to ex-Minister, the Rt. Hon. Frank Field MP, delivered a few days earlier. ALL alleged victim-challengers who contacted Andrew Yiannides, by the time the letter was sent to the Minister, received copy of the letter just as they received copies of other letters submitted to government maintained Ministers and other official appointees to public office. Accessing the material pointed to from the letter (URLs) is of utmost importance. It should assist 'recognition of the citizen's rights at work', when called upon properly in truly democratic states. The above in 2003; there were other 'submissions' and among such civilised and, within the law, approaches by citizens that led to the right actions by governments, the explicit challenges when we set about exposing one of the most evil of alleged victims of the legal circles to have ever contacted us [*Link to our explicit submissions to (a)  the Prime Minister, (b) the Chancellor / Treasury, (c) the Home Secretary. WE acted so after we had secured more than enough evidence about the parts of an alleged victim whose only interests were (i) the rewards under the table FOR KEEPING QUIET about the ORGANISED FRAUD THROUGH ABUSE OF THE COURTS' FACILITIES and (ii) her parts in blunt attempts that were intended to discredit the person she was sent along to mess about with, Mr Andrew Yiannides]. Access please the letter to the Home Secretary, the Rt. Hon. Jack Straw, in December 1998 [*Link* [*L] from here to the letter] and note the results evinced in the newspaper article (Hornsey Journal) also within days of the letter reaching its destination. Many the charlatans and stooges -lovers and 'promoters of the system as is'- on the job for decades; one and all acting as sold souls always do [*Link [*L] from here to the evidence we point to relative to the parts of one of a number of sold to the system fraudsters who were sent along / introduced to Andrew Yiannides by the managers / organisers of the LIPS crowd / mob].
    1.   xxx
    2.   xxx
    3.   xxx
    4.   xxx
    5.   xxx



The creator of this website was inviting victims to access URrights & join him there with other victims to expose & challenge abusers of trust & public office until the providers of the facilities >ning.com< introduced new terms and conditions for the provision of the facilities. Access from here and read of the imposed states by the brains behind ning.com and consider only one element "WHY OBSTRUCT & HINDER THE DOWNLOAD of the existing material at URrights.ning.com >the intellectual properties of the creator of that presence on the Internet and those who joined him there? Read below of the unacceptable conduct and behaviour by the reckless abusers of trust, who set out to obstruct and blackmail the creator of URrights.ning

Persons who are genuinely concerned and object to the ways they were / are being treated by alleged servants of the publicand the law >in any PSEUDOdemocracy, or whatever states / conditions they are subjected to< by abusers of public facilities and public office >as we cover in our web-pages< should contact webmaster@human-rights.org for information relevant to the creation of similar facilities for INFOrmation on URrights, for facilities for URrights EUrope and for a NETwork of URrights activists.

  • APOLOGIES to friends and persons who could not access URrights following the recent changes by the providers of the facility (ning.com) Andrew Yiannides created and used the portal to create the presence on the Internet for the group of victims / challengers who joined with him to expose and challenge the arrogant and blunt abuse of public services in all allegedly civilised societies > PSEUDODEMOCRACIES <.

  • The changes related to the introduction of charges for the facilities, included the facility for ning.com to archive the material at URrights; also the facility to download the archived material to the creator's system (computer) while the creator and his group of friends considered which of the level of charges and service the group was to adopt.

  • HOWEVER the creator, Andrew Yiannides, WAS UNABLE TO DOWNLOAD THE ARCHIVED MATERIAL and all attempts to engage the providers and their staff in reasonable explanation as to WHY THE FAILURES TO CONNECT / DOWNLOAD from the ning.com servers THE ARCHIVED MATERIAL, were contemptuously ignored.

  • Emails to the Publicity, to the Promotion, to the Public Relations, also to the Chief Executive's Office merited no response whatsoever from anyone acting for ning.com

  • In the circumstances Andrew will appreciate any information related to the problems covered above. Andrew will also appreciate any information relative to exchanges with or email postings, from ning.com to existing members.

  • EXISTING URrights members, victims of the legal system, victims of solicitors and the courts should access the updated pages at .org/solicitors.htm and .org/solfraud.htm by using the links from the list below.

Below pages where we expose known lovers of it all, users and maintenance engineers of the system as is

.org/1999dfax.htm .org/1ofmany.htm .org/2lipstalk.htm .org/4deceit.htm .org/absolute.htm .org/abusers.htm
.org/account4.htm .org/actors.htm .org/actors2.htm .org/adoko.htm .org/bankers.htm .org/beware.htm
.org/blunket1.htm .org/chaldep1.htm .org/confraud.htm .org/contract.htm .org/convicti.htm .org/courts.htm
.org/corruptcourts.htm .org/crimesin.htm .org/dreamers.htm .org/evesused.htm .org/evilones.htm .org/famfraud.htm
.org/govolso.htm .org/guesswhy.htm .org/len.htm .org/mauricek.htm .org/media.htm .org/solfraud.htm
.org/solicitors.htm .org/someplan.htm .org/someploy.htm .org/thefacts.htm .org/theproof.htm .org/thenerve.htm
.org/twisted.htm .org/uaccount.htm .org/ukmm.htm .org/uwatchit.htm .org/watchit1.htm .org/yourtax.htm
  • Every single person we name and expose in the above pages elected to ignore THEIR OBLIGATIONS TO REPORT (to 'the serfs' = 'the taxpayers'), THE ABUSERS OF PUBLIC OFFICE & PUBLIC FACILITIES. All were/are relying on the Intellectual Prostitutes, from within the media, to keep it all in the family closet.
  • All, as typical twin-tongue hypocrites carry on complaining about the media for failing to report & for suppressing the facts and the realities they allegdely reported to the hard of hearing, to the otherwise committed angels blowing their silent trumpets for decades, all ready and gearing to welcome the expansion of the New World Order.
  • Of such parts the contributions from and failings of the persons we name and expose, AS IF THEIR OWN SILENCE, THEIR FAILURES  & THEIR BLUNT OBSTRUCTIONS to the work and other actions by the creator of this website, Andrew Yiannides, treated by one and all as if non-existent with the exception when the wily Norman Scarth, set off to abuse the trust he was allowed to benefit from, while his parts and questionable activities / performance were under scrutiny, specifically after HE FAILED to publish the full transcript of the Court of Appeal hearing HE WAS ALLOWED TO RECORD* [*Link from here to the food for thought page created by Andrew Yiannides, in the first instance].
  • Not one ever bothered to address the issues we expose in the explicit page, despite the fact that we have been pointing all of our contacts, since May 1992, to it all.
  • Visitors, readers and researchers are urged / invited to access and read the letter which the Hon. Secretary of the Litigants In Person Society, Mr. Norman Scarth sent to the founder of human-rights, Mr. Andrew Yiannides, reproduced in the page .org/4deceit.htm* [*L]
  • The author's statements, such as 'what for and why seek additional assistance', thereby spelling out his parts as a lover of it all.
  • Common sense dictates, that he should have directed his request to his partners in deceptions aplenty, one & all engaging in fraudulent misrepresentations AND NOTED TO HAVE, WILFULLY, BEEN SUPPRESSING, FROM THE TAXPAYERS, THE FACTS OF LIFE RELATIVE TO THE RAMPANT ABUSE OF THE COURTS FACILITIES as the failure of all to co-operate as covered and pointed to at:- [*L]. One and all fallen to the facilities for fraud aplenty on the taxpayers and the corruption of illiterates in law, the conditioned victims of the legal circles & courts who fall to the blackmail element attached to the REWARD for keeping the realities away from the taxpayers; just like the media and the Ministers responsible for the application of long existing law to the criminal activities we cover in our pages, do.
  • All the while one and all were / are engaging in the scenarios we cover in the exclusive page, which page the author of the letter which Mr Norman Scarth sent to Andrew Yiannides, afforded us the opportunity to address the issue of the contributions of his partners and affiliates in fraud aplenty on the taxpayers; despite the reminder one and all, named in the new page simply shoved it all in the dark corners of their devoid of grey matter skulls, their perverted / corrupted mind(s)

On Sunday morning, the 19th September 2010, the Deputy Prime Minister, leader of the Liberal-Democrats in the course of the BBC TV politics programme, spoke of the coalition government's commitment to address the element of waste and fraud through the public services sector. We trust and hope that the elements we expose in our pages and the parts adopted by the conditioned victims of the legal circles, the persons who engage in PROMOTING & EXPANDING THE ONGOING CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUD ON THE TAXPAYERS, THROUGH ABUSE OF THE COURTS' FACILITIES, will be on the top of the list of government priorities.
Visitors, readers & researchers are urged to access the letters to Minister Frank Field [*L] after he had been directed by the Prime Minister to think/do the unthinkable.
Link also from here [*L] to the explicit letter to the Home Secretary in December 1998 with submissions arising out of the RAMPANT HOUSING BENEFIT FRAUD
On Tuesday 23rd November 2010, 'the Guardian' in its Comment & Debate page carried an article by Nick Clegg, the Deputy Prime Minister. In the evening of the same day the Deputy Prime Minister addressed a large audience at Kings place in respect of the government's changes on university students fees / loans.
Access from here the page where we reproduce an image of 'the Guardian' article & consider the simple fact that we, alone, have been asserting and proclaiming our objections to the theft of funds from the national budget leading to the ever-increasing annual deficit in the state's balance of payments.

ACCESS:  http://www.justice-uk.human-rights.org/ (For an important message at this Community-on-Line web-site) & thereafter,
Access also http://www.law.society.complaints.and.human-rights.org/ (Judge instigates Fraud On Tax Payers - he knows not the difference between 'imposed' & 'no undue influence'). APOLOGIES FOR THE DISAPPEARANCE OF THIS WEBSITE.It appears that the beneficiary of the work, both for applications to the courts in the United Kingdom and the submissions to the European Court for Human Rights* [*Link from here to the Statement of Facts submitted to the ECoHR], arranged with the providers of the free web space to erase the Intellectual Property of Andrew Yiannides, the founder of the human-rights Community-on-Line, without any reference to the creator of the website and owner of the Intellectual Property!
鼯font> Copyright subsists on all material in our web-site, owned by the authors of same.
Visitors can refer to these pages in any non commercial activity, so long as attribution is given as to source. License to use, for commercial or other specific use of the material, shall have been secured in writing first, from the owners of any property and material from these pages. No material shall be reproduced in any form and by any means without prior agreement and or license in writing from the copyright owners. The Press are invited to contact us if they wish to publish material in the Public Interest, As We Do.
For any problems or questions regarding this web-site contact:  webmaster