h-rtitle.gif (7604 bytes)

Crime - Organised - Institutionalised - Corruption - Fraud - Protection Rackets, run and managed by judicial chair occupants, in a free-for-all state of abundance. Note below the arrangements between the administrative, the judiciary and the media; read of the all-embracing guarantee in place, in contempt of all law : the root shall be pointed to.

WHERE IS JUSTICE? Read below:-

"The court has inherent jurisdiction to stay an action which must fail; as, for instance an action brought in respect of an act of State"

*Link from here to founder's tribulations in 1972-75 and marvel at the creativity of allegedly honourable officers of Justice and the Law in the mother of all PSEUDOdemocracies

  • And by extension any act of any public servant who is appointed, retained and maintained by other public servants for all of whom, the state, as employer, is ultimately responsible, including abusers of judicial chair occupancy. Hence, the billions paid out as covered in the affidavit which visitors can link to directly from here [*Link].
  • Link also from here to the founder's conclusions as of 1972-75 when the great Metropolitan police were seen to be nothing but accessories to and abettors of the rampant fraud and corruption through the courts organised and processed to fruition while Members of Parliament were -as they still do- promoting the waffle that amounts to nothing short of:-

'independence of the judiciary to act in contempt of ALL LAW (national and international) in a pseudo-democracy.

*Link from here to proof of the parts the police play in promotion and expansion of the criminal activities instigated, processed and imposed on society by the legal circles. Read of assertions by a typical hypocrite, none other than the Commissioner of the Metropolitan Police, Sir Robert Mark QPM, when he spoke of FALSE RECORDS / FORGERIES by the legal circles while delivering his famous Dimbleby Lecture on BBC-TV in November 1973, 15 months after he received true copy of THE FORGERY advanced and promoted by the licensed criminals : solicitors and barristers for their evil ends in the case that opened Andrew Yiannides' mental eyes to the realities of life in the United Kingdom, a typical PSEUDOdemocracy. Can anyone enlighten Andrew and the millions of victims of the legal circles WHY NO PROSECUTION of the solicitors & the barristers in 1972 or thereafter?.

  • With such a facility in place (the words we point to above) and arrogant abuse of public office, can anyone assert, or argue, that Mr Andrew Yiannides, the founder of human-rights, was not right to determine that Justice has been abducted and that she is held captive in the dungeons maintained by her abductors who rape her daily in their courts? (>Hence the c reation of www.jusaticeraped.org <)
  • ALL Member States of the European Union are subject to the ruling which visitors, readers and researchers can access in the explicit page /yourrights.htm

*Link from here to the realities - in due course also a link to the warning (indirect but nonetheless very clear) for thinkers to recognise 

  • On 3rd March 2008 >someone's birthday< we released a House of Lords PRECEDENT CASE and reveal deliberations by their Lordships in respect of FRAUD - DECEPTION - CONSPIRACY & IMPLIED LIES BY KEEPING SILENT about any wrong imposed on any other.
  • >>> IN THE MEANTIME we have been naming and shaming a number who know of and engage in much more than just approve wrongs imposed on Mr & Mrs Average, the millions of taxpayers, in our allegedly civilised country / state / province / district of the European Union created by politicians, without reference to the taxed for fraud sucker-serfs, allegedly for the benefit of the citizens from FRAUD & CORRUPTION, among other promotions.

Needless to say the case entailed activities and practices by solicitors as Mr Andrew Yiannides was subjected to, decades later, by an old school friend, Mr Kypros Nichola of Nicholas & Co. in London. Mr K. Nichola bluntly abused the trust placed in him and indulged, in tandem with others, in criminal activities intended to cause the damages that were imposed on the targeted 'serf' by accredited - by the Law Society & Bar Council - allegedly Honourable Officers of the Supreme Court, the courts maintained by successive elected governments in the United Kingdom, one of many pseudodemocracies. In due course another revelation relevant to the arrogant 'inherent jurisdiction', through which to deny, obstruct justice & impose all manner of criminally created states on 'the serfs', who are taxed for the cost of maintaining criminals in public office, in pseudo-democracies.

RESPONSIBLE FOR THE STATE OF AFFAIRS, successive irresponsible Lord Chancellors and Home Secretaries who ignored and ignore all complaints and submissions by victims of the organised crimes we point to and expose in our pages, irrespective of the evidence and the law pointed to, by the victims of it all, the citizens who are called upon to pay taxes for the maintenance of criminals in public office.

[*Link from here to our exclusive page, covering confidential fraud as arranged THROUGH THE BEST KEPT OPEN SECRET in alleged democracies, European States. Elsewhere the foundations and corner stone upon which the operatives built the societies of their making using the bricks and mortar we cover in this and other pages. The visitor should not be under any illusion that the stars in the theatrical productions, covered in our pages were by any stretch of the imagination 'humans' who were / are gifted with any attributes that distinguish 'true humans' (>thinkers<) from animals.

Fraud in court  Council staff use Forgeries   Misconduct in Public Office. 2 cases relative to applicable law One Protocol says it ALL It betrays arrogant intentions Law Provides for THEFTS and it covers Judges too Judges' duties   TIME 4 CHANGE   & CHALLENGES Site CONTENTS - Table of Contents & ongoing work Your Rights & OBLIGATIONS to Society SITE SEARCH facility for any specific element / issue of concern to visitors / readers
COURTS : their Facilities Abused For ORGANISED CRIME : FRAUD Solicitor's Perjury & Victim Ignores it all Just like the Law Society always does Blackmailed or is it Just Conditioned & Subjugated Victims who join the club ? We name Lovers of blunt fraud through courts - Users of the facilities 4 illicit gains Local Authorities & FRAUD on 'serfs' the Taxpayers who are kept in the dark Police Party to & Endorsing Criminal Acts, Activities Arrogant Fraud FALSE Records & Contempt of Law by the legal Circles & Public Services The crafty ones & Vexatious Litigant PLOYS for the rewarded silent

* Information FOR victims who wish to co-operate by EXPOSING & CHALLENGING abusers of Public Office *

family.uk-human-rights justiceraped.org dssfraud.htm confraud.htm dadscare.htm contract.htm converts.htm MensAid
solicitorsfromhell.co.uk chancellor.htm theyknow.htm solfraud.htm sheknows.htm 4deceit.htm convicti.htm forward.htm

December 2006 - SUMMONS ISSUED & SERVED IN RESPECT OF FRAUDULENT & RECKLESSLY IRRESPONSIBLE ACTIVITIES & IMPOSITIONS THROUGH THE FAMILY COURTS

*Link from here to evidence. *Link also from here to a case when the abusers of the courts' facilities abandoned their plans for another targeted family

IMPORTANT INFORMATION for all victims of malpractice - misconduct - negligence, etc. TO NOTE

In the civil justice system in England and Wales, a judge presides over the proceedings that are argued by the opposing sides through the adversarial process. The process enables the court, judge, to reach a conclusion as to the truth of the facts in dispute. Thereat it is for the judge to apply the law to the facts proven, established at court.

The system as evolved is covered in the page 'English Legal System' and remains the same after the Woolf reforms.

An explicit Affidavit [*L] plus exhibits and
     letters to a Chief Inspector of Police
[*L],
          one to solicitors
[*L] and another to the Lord Chancellor [*L] evince
               ORGANISED CRIMES
(Access and read the letter to the police in September 2006 [*L])

Access & read from one of a number of letters to the Prime Minister : * I believe that New Labour will deliver us from the wrongs we have been suffering for far too long. Use of our resources in terms of human potential and capabilities can and should be channelled through rights not wrongs, through positives not through negatives. It is our produce and ingenuity we can sell to others not the minefields of corrupt and bankrupt public services. * [*Link from here to the page, note the steps taken to ensure the Prime Minister forwarded / delegated submissions and evidence received at 10 Downing Street to the right Minister / Ministry because the submissions were in respect of ORGANISED CRIMES

3rd March 2011 added link [*L] to the BBC-TV Dimbleby Lecture in 1973 as the Metropolitan Police Commissioner, Sir Robert Mark prepared & presented to the sucker-serfs

...

downingstreet.htm   KEY PageChanges  10 Jan. 2003

Downing Street *Page created February 1999*       
hrbnrsml.gif (1162 bytes) JOIN the Community On Line and publish your Statement of Facts and the Evidence you have. Use your rights in law (link) and ACT with others against the offenders. Join in a class action.

Affiliated Sites For The Above Projected Action   lbduk.org (group)

Go to HomePage

KEY to page / site
1. Page ISSUES - List
2. Blank Cheques Industry
3. Undertaking by Labour
4. Citizens to be Served
5. Challenging Corruption
6. Yard Targets Lawyers
part 4

 

HEADLINES of the Daily Mail on 30 July 1998 - clear. Was it just a case of promises-promises? YOU be the judges. Read our comments by accessing the page we created after 'The SUN' published an interesting article on 7th March 2002. *Link To our explicit page
yardin4g.jpg (81503 bytes)
The headlines above say it all. However, untouchables at the time were meant to be the legal circles not just rogue police officers, as later the public was being 'fed' through the media and alleged servants of the public. 

To Corrupt Britain

The ISSUES - List
1. Copyright Law
2. Grinding the poor...
3. Judicious = mental state
<>
<>

SECTION 3
<>
<>

SECTION 4
<>
<>

SECTION 5
<>
<>

 

 

IN THIS PANEL WE PROPOSE TO ADD LINKS POINTING TO OTHER SITES  THAT LINK TO THIS WEB-SITE

 

IN THIS PANEL WE PROPOSE TO ADD LINKS POINTING TO OTHER SITES  THAT LINK TO THIS WEB-SITE

 

IN THIS PANEL WE PROPOSE TO ADD LINKS POINTING TO OTHER SITES  THAT LINK TO THIS WEB-SITE
undercon.gif (286 bytes) Page Revised: June 20, 2012.  
Site reconstruction for better navigation. Ongoing additions to pages + links to new pages

As part of the re-construction process our new pages and pages where changes and additions have been or are so to be improved - amended are endorsed with the link 'Page Changes and the date of the last changes. The link takes visitors to a List of the changes implemented in the page. This includes new material and links from relevant paragraphs to other  / new relevant material in other pages. For further clarification email: webmaster@

VISITORS ARE URGED to access and READ THE IMPORTANT update and ADDENDA we were obliged to introduce in January 2002. We had no choice but to REPORT THE CRIMES TO THE TREASURY; our observations and knowledge of the constructive frauds made us accessories if we kept quiet, like the alleged victims who work towards the implementation of the schemes by the abductors and rapists of Justice, the Goddess.  You will find the addenda statement at the top of the Updated Pages File. We are sure that you will share with us our concerns and most profound disappointment at and with persons who adopt and promote activities which they know are nothing but downright crimes. We refer to our exclusive page where we expose (as conscientious law abiding citizens) the Confidentiality Between Fraudsters that exists care of the BEST OPEN SECRET. 

Guidelines on Navigating through the extensive material: access instructions.  

As part of the reconstruction process our new pages and pages where changes and additions have been implemented, the improved / amended pages are endorsed with the link 'Page Changes and the date of the last changes. The link takes visitors to a List of the changes implemented in the page. These include new material and links from relevant paragraphs to other or new relevant material in other pages. For further clarification email: webmaster@

OUR observations and comment to the Lord Chancellor's office in respect of 

"The Downing Street Years - case" (the Court of Appeal ruling)The a

The above relates to the title of the work/book memoirs of Lady Margaret Thatcher, Conservative Leader and the Prime Minister who projected the United Kingdom into the 21st century through the policies and the initiatives she pursued while in office.

'The Sunday Times' contracted with the copyright owners to serialise extracts from the book and the 'Daily Mirror' announced its intention to publish extracts, without license or the agreement of the copyright owners. As it was natural the owners applied to court for an appropriate order. We simply assert and assume that professionals and experts in the area of applicable law were retained and instructed accordingly.

In its ruling the CoA directed that the application before it was wrong and that the remedy for the copyright owner(s) lay in an action to be founded after the Daily Mirror was to publish extracts, and then to claim damages. We simply pointed out to the cost and method of seeking to establish damages in such a scenario.....HOW MUCH THE PROFESSIONS WOULD MAKE through the suggested / proposed scenario. In a nutshell copyright law did not exist for the occasion but it would exist after the 'Daily Mirror' published !!!!  

 

IT WAS like the parents (copyright owners) of a child (book) held at knife point by a criminal (Daily Mirror) threatening to cut the child to pieces (print extracts) and the parents (copyright owners) calling upon the police (applying to Court/Judges) to stop that crime. AND the police turning round to say "Let him cut the child to pieces WE CAN THEN HAVE A TRIAL FOR MURDER" (Fair comment / holding opinions IS guaranteed to all citizens under the European Convention on Human Rights (ECoHR)* supported and ratified by the United Kingdom). (Back to: barristers  copyright infringement   )

The CAMILA project*,  pointed out in 1991 " We are no longer in 'Bleak House' Era and or times. The citizens are mostly educated and better informed;  at the touch of a button they benefit from and impart, receive information to and from around the globe. We are reaching for the stars. IT IS TIME FOR OUR LEGAL EXPERTS(!)* to reach for their consciousness and so must our governing elite, the quangos and the rest of the bureaucrats in government institutions.

Our LEA's are relying on one another and they partake in the  income generating conditions and practices from within the present framework that our Law Enforcement Agencies operate and control. Citizens systematically and habitually ARE being denied Fundamental HUMAN RIGHTS and equal treatment through financial impositions, by 'grinding the poor to a halt' (a well known adage on our 'Law and our Courts'). We need to bring about changes both in Law and attitudes to LAW. The High and Mighty are of the opinion that we are still in "Bleak House" Era. The much revered independence of our Judiciary appears to be used to impose on the citizens undeclared Government Policies; with the Government of the day washing its hands (as in the N.U.M and other cases).  Similarly in every other case, every victim and citizen’s tribulations and complaints are brushed aside on the very SAME grounds but with the usual:- "they are the experts, what do you know of the law?  " YOU Refer them to The CAMILA Project* and the proposed C.A.P’s in the future; for now refer them to "The Breeding Grounds-case" * and "The Stephen Lawrence" * ongoing saga and the overdrawn tribulations of his suffering parents. (Back to: CICA page  The Criminal Injuries Compensation Authority Most Definitely is PART OF THE INSTITUTIONALISED & ORGANISED CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY)

  • The CAMILA Project *  needs you as much as you need and will be needing its resources which YOU MUST HELP PUT TOGETHER. The proposed DATA BANK (of THE Citizens’ Alternative Precedents) will seek to and, WILL ESTABLISH the seriousness of and the extent of the situation. 20,000 cases a year to the Law Society (whatever the true figure be well over double by the late 1998 we are given to understand). AND the average citizen is none the wiser. Individually citizens have nothing to support their complaints and are unable to present their individual cases alone.
  • Consider JOINing the Community On Line and
  • Publish your sufferings - Statements of Facts
  • WITH THE EVIDENCE needed
  • To cut down to size the fraudsters
  • All, who parade themselves as 'judicious' (mental state) persons
  • When in fact they are simply abusers of occupation of 'judicial' chairs (physical state).
  • Use Your Rights In International Law to Fair Comment and
  • YOUR DUTY TO REPORT CRIME
  • Read the explicit page Confidentiality Between Fraudsters and
  • Recognise that You pay taxes
  • For judges to IGNORE law and evidence thus endorsing crime
  • They consciously defraud you of your rights in and at law and
  • YOU PAY for some who go to the European Court of Human Rights
  • To Benefit from the Institutionalised Organised Compensation Industry
  • JOIN and challenge, with others, the CIUKU Enterprises
NOTE PLEASE. New Labour, in 1995, announced its intention :
"......when in government it would maintain a register of judges whose performance was/is questioned".

Following the announcement our founder wrote to the leader, the Rt. Hon Tony Blair. Exchanges followed with his private office. A meeting with the Parliamentary spokes-person on LEGAL AFFAIRS, for the opposition, exchanges with and submissions by our founder (in the course of a debate, at Westminster Hall, in the course of  "THE FESTIVAL OF RIGHTS") that very year took place. Days later our founder received a letter written by the Rt. Hon. Paul Boateng, who was writing on behalf of the Prime Minister in waiting (in opposition at the time) acknowledging the element of FRAUD IN THE LEGAL SYSTEM. Through that letter New Labour assured us (the citizens of the UK) and PROMISED :-

"This document, ... promises radical and wide-ranging measures to ensure that the legal system as a whole, including the Legal Aid Scheme, the Legal Professions, the courts and the judiciary, is focussed explicitly on the interests of the individual citizen and consumer of legal services". 

In other words the courts will ensure the CITIZENS ARE SERVED; not simply the persons operating from within the legal circles; benefit from services by the courts and the Judiciary to be focussed 'correctly' and not blinkered. The letter went on:-

"We propose to put an end to waste, excessive costs, and fraud within the legal system and to refer every aspect of the operations of the legal profession to the Monopolies and Mergers Commission". 

THE IMPORTANT WORDS are "...fraud within the legal system...".

We have noted many changes since New Labour came into power. The present government must not succumb to the pressures and the oppositions raised from within the Legal System. It is time for EQUALITY and equal treatment as provided and assured under the law, national and international to which the United Kingdom subscribed and subscribes.

The unions were hammered to the ground and made to realise that the WHOLE, the other citizens HAVE RIGHTS. So should the 'almighty be made to recognise that they are not above the law. The so called 'untouchables' must be caused to realise that their personal interests (dishonest at that*) are not above the interests of the citizens as a whole and or to the country en masse. Our reputation as a nation of and with ideals AS WITH THE MUCH PROCLAIMED respect to democratic principles has been and is being tarnished and violated.

The situation is so because the very circles who were/are retained by successive governments (on behalf of the citizens, the taxpayers) have been let loose on society and they all indulge as they please, IN CONTEMPT OF THE LAW. For centuries, and for far too long, they have been free to act as they please; outside the LAWS of Parliament. With contempt, and impunity.

Unchecked and uncontrolled !

Unmanageable ?

In contempt of the law ? [*Link from here to judge challenged - authorised TRANSCRIPT]

The Law exists not for them ?

WHY blunt discrimination & FRAUDS IMPOSED on the taxpayers ?

The following challenge was put to a past Lord Chancellor: 

"Can YOU IMAGINE the state of British Industry IF one and all from within it were let loose to act as they pleased, unchecked, unsupervised and UNCONTROLLED?

The CAMILA Project and the citizens of the United Kingdom, look forward to being INFORMED of the progress in the investigations, announcement on 30 July 1998 because the matters amount to an investigation in corrupt practices*. The issues arising from and attached to those serious matters must be looked at with true adherence to the law; the authorities are reminded that a  wise old saying does qualify "There can be no smoke without a fire" and another "the fish begins to rot in the head". The high profile investigation should not and must not be treated as the John Stalker investigation was; such practices and 'policies' serious as they were/are, eventually were the subject of a ruling AGAINST the United Kingdom. ALL condemnations at Strasbourg should serve as reminders to all, that we are no longer insulated as an island from invasion and EVEN less from fair comment by others.  A fair and incorruptible judicial system is the first priority of any, alleged, democratic state and government. When the Government (any) fails to consider the views OF and deal WITH the tribulations imposed on its own citizens from within and 'BY STATE RUN AND MAINTAINED INSTITUTIONS' that government ceases to have the right to refer to itself as a democratic government. DEMOCRACY means the state (KRATOS) in the hands of (DEMOS) the public; not in the hands of any single person and or group which is under any pressure and or controlled by the vested interests of others, let alone subject to 'secret briefings' and or undeclared policies and or practices. Ultimately it is the state that suffers the consequences on behalf of its own tested and 'abused' citizens; those who are caused to suffer the consequences of an 'amoral society'; the society created and promoted as and by those who Sir Peter Michael Ibden (ex Commissioner of the Metropolitan Police) spoke of in an explicit interview he granted to Valerie Grove (refer to "The Times" in October 1992).

Link to: -

CAP's: Misconduct in Public Office A police officer FAILS TO ACT AS HIS RETAINER COMMANDED - found GUILTY, appeals only to fail with implications 'the serfs' are no longer subject to because the rule of law, logic, common sense and MORALS , PRINCIPLES OF LAW & JUSTICE NO LONGER APPLY in a member state of the European Union.....

Link to: -

CAP's: Fraud Vitiates Judgement A court of appeal ruling that QUALIFIED & CLARIFIED that at some recent point in time, the rule of law applied, as the citizens (yet serfs) who were / are 'subjected' ('subjects of the realm', remember?)  to the whims of the corrupters, the corrupt and the corrupted. The last being the most dangerous and devious of the lot, mainly alleged EX victims of the legal circles, the courts and the police. 

Link to: -

CAP's: No D-Notice Assurances and promotion of the principle all are fed with from junior school years, whereby THE FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION, THE RIGHT TO EXCHANGE & DISTRIBUTE IDEAS RESTING & FOUNDED ON THE TRUTH OF THE MATTER was / is not interfered with. Readers should USE THE PROMOTION & ASSURANCES and at the same time ensure that they are well read in the realities and the root of the evil forces behind their personal experiences. Not everything rests on that which is promoted and projected by public servants who simply act as lap-dogs trained by Pavlov. [*Link to media page for the realities disclosed by an insider when he was moving out of the firing line : retiring].

Link to: -

CAP's: "The Breeding Grounds-case" A targeted serf is faced with problems created by rogue builder and from the police, through to the courts, civil (County Court) and criminal (Magistrates Courts) is subjected to fraud after fraud after fraud with defaults and failures aplenty. FALSE INSTRUMENTS part of the tools of all. Criminal damages to property and threats to life, irrelevant and immaterial because the victim family are targeted as a family that merits no protection under the law, the law as practised, naturally by the CRIMINALS WHO ARE & HAVE BEEN IN CONTROL for far too long. Read the explicit appeal where the link takes the reader and recognise the forces at work before you read the briefly stated facts of the case. (*Link to the words to the lawyers of the days, attributed to Jesus Christ by the editors of the New Testament way back in the 4th Century AD).

Link to: -

CAP's: Police Summons the Victim of crimes An inebriated (drunk) driver of one of a few continental saloon cars registered in the United Kingdom causes an accident and extensive damages to another vehicle. The drunk just drives off and all the police engaged in was to summons (5 Summonses) the victim who was not in breach of any statute or wrong act. A short and funny story covering also the reckless and vile parts of solicitors who treat victims of the police as non-entities and simply 'serfs' who work to create in order that the Masters & Lords in our society / country can just take, grub and steal through contempt of the law. Readers should access the case and use it as a precedent case when confronted / faced with any of the elements covered in the case WHICH CASE ONE & ALL WERE CAUSED TO ABANDON after they had all abuse public facilities at cost to the taxpayers, merely because in their books the victim of the hit and run was not entitled to protection of the law. 

Link to: -

CAP's: Stephen Lawrence - case & our submissions + challenge to the authorities. Access the page and read of Parliament's provisions in the United Kingdom in matters of default and omissions by public servants WHO TORMENT & TORTURE ANY CITIZEN (irrelevant of nationality) in the United Kingdom. Just a case of more law subject to the contempt for it all, by alleged servants of the public. Nothing unusual when one considers the Court of Appeal & House of Lords ruling way back in 1939 & 1940 (respectively) in respect of costs attributed to inexcusable pleadings and presentations at court by legal representatives without justified grounds for such abuse of court time and trust of / reliance by clients. Another, and most offensive example, the failures of successive governments to put on the Statute Books the provisions and undertakings, purportedly subscribed to by the United Kingdom, way back in 1948-1951 to the European Convention on Human Rights.   

Link to: -

CAP's: Corrupt Practices

Link to: -

CAP's: Norman Scarth Records Court of Appeal hearing Readers, visiting victims, as advised to access the page, print the very short statements introducing the two pages from a transcript of the hearing. Victims of misconducted court hearing in the UK should USE SUCH EVIDENCE in order to demand they too, be allowed to record their appearances before any court in order that they be allowed to benefit FROM UNADULTERATED & TRUE RECORDS OF THEIR ARGUMENTS & REPRESENTATIONS in any judicial or public hearings relative to their rights, as assured in law. [*Link to the page where we cover and expose persons who proclaim and declare concerns about the denial of rights to unadulterated records, and be prepared for the shock of shocks].

Link to: -

CAP's: The Frank Cuningham - case

Link to: -

CAP's: Scriven H-P

Link to: -

CAP's: District Judge engaged in constructive frauds in TYPICAL DIVORCE PROCEEDINGS and the victim proves to have been an engaging and enterprising fraudsters club recruit. As with the rest of the group he joined forces with, his priorities were to work in tandem with the abusers of the courts facilities, SIMPLY FOR MORE OF THE SAME IMPOSITIONS ON THE TAXPAYERS. Use of the victims they are pointed to by the legal circles or they target as accomplished maintenance engineers of the rampant fraud and corruption through the courts.

Link to: -

CAP's: European Convention on Human Rights (ECoHR) Link points to a BBC internet page that was removed after the television series on human rights finished. The BBC page covered the fact that the UK was, the worst offender on violations for decades. Readers / visitors can link to the page where we publish challenges to the European Court of Human Rights when the propositions put to a victim were way out..... while all were of opinion that we are not familiar with the law AND WHY THE PROPOSITIONS.... and smoke screen after the criminals who abuse the courts facilities in national / state / courts milk their victims of their assets in order to be rewarded AS ARRANGED (practice changed) FOLLOWING THE NEED (for Parliament in the United Kingdom) TO INTRODUCE an Act that placed in the Statue Books a defective Act of Parliament pursuant to the undertakings and commitment of the UK over 50, yes FIFTY YEARS EARLIER.

Link to: -

CAP's: Divorce / Family proceedings WHEN fraudulent court impositions were ABANDONED by the abusers of the courts facilities in their long established ways through CONTEMPT OF ALL LAW.

Link to: - CAP's: The MEDIA
Link to: - The CAMILA project 
Link to: - Challenging Legal Experts link to USA Web-site 

...

Back to Fraud at Court

 

The creator of this website was inviting victims to access URrights & join him there with other victims to expose & challenge abusers of trust & public office until the providers of the facilities >ning.com< introduced new terms and conditions for the provision of the facilities. Access from here and read of the imposed states by the brains behind ning.com and consider only one element "WHY OBSTRUCT & HINDER THE DOWNLOAD of the existing material at URrights.ning.com >the intellectual properties of the creator of that presence on the Internet and those who joined him there? Read below of the unacceptable conduct and behaviour by the reckless abusers of trust, who set out to obstruct and blackmail the creator of URrights.ning

Persons who are genuinely concerned and object to the ways they were / are being treated by alleged servants of the publicand the law >in any PSEUDOdemocracy, or whatever states / conditions they are subjected to< by abusers of public facilities and public office >as we cover in our web-pages< should contact webmaster@human-rights.org for information relevant to the creation of similar facilities for INFOrmation on URrights, for facilities for URrights EUrope and for a NETwork of URrights activists.

  • APOLOGIES to friends and persons who could not access URrights following the recent changes by the providers of the facility (ning.com) Andrew Yiannides created and used the portal to create the presence on the Internet for the group of victims / challengers who joined with him to expose and challenge the arrogant and blunt abuse of public services in all allegedly civilised societies > PSEUDODEMOCRACIES <.

  • The changes related to the introduction of charges for the facilities, included the facility for ning.com to archive the material at URrights; also the facility to download the archived material to the creator's system (computer) while the creator and his group of friends considered which of the level of charges and service the group was to adopt.

  • HOWEVER the creator, Andrew Yiannides, WAS UNABLE TO DOWNLOAD THE ARCHIVED MATERIAL and all attempts to engage the providers and their staff in reasonable explanation as to WHY THE FAILURES TO CONNECT / DOWNLOAD from the ning.com servers THE ARCHIVED MATERIAL, were contemptuously ignored.

  • Emails to the Publicity, to the Promotion, to the Public Relations, also to the Chief Executive's Office merited no response whatsoever from anyone acting for ning.com

  • In the circumstances Andrew will appreciate any information related to the problems covered above. Andrew will also appreciate any information relative to exchanges with or email postings, from ning.com to existing members.

  • EXISTING URrights members, victims of the legal system, victims of solicitors and the courts should access the updated pages at .org/solicitors.htm and .org/solfraud.htm by using the links from the list below.

Below pages where we expose known lovers of it all, users and maintenance engineers of the system as is

.org/1999dfax.htm .org/1ofmany.htm .org/2lipstalk.htm .org/4deceit.htm .org/absolute.htm .org/abusers.htm
.org/account4.htm .org/actors.htm .org/actors2.htm .org/adoko.htm .org/bankers.htm .org/beware.htm
.org/blunket1.htm .org/chaldep1.htm .org/confraud.htm .org/contract.htm .org/convicti.htm .org/courts.htm
.org/corruptcourts.htm .org/crimesin.htm .org/dreamers.htm .org/evesused.htm .org/evilones.htm .org/famfraud.htm
.org/govolso.htm .org/guesswhy.htm .org/len.htm .org/mauricek.htm .org/media.htm .org/solfraud.htm
.org/solicitors.htm .org/someplan.htm .org/someploy.htm .org/thefacts.htm .org/theproof.htm .org/thenerve.htm
.org/twisted.htm .org/uaccount.htm .org/ukmm.htm .org/uwatchit.htm .org/watchit1.htm .org/yourtax.htm
  • Every single person we name and expose in the above pages elected to ignore THEIR OBLIGATIONS TO REPORT (to 'the serfs' = 'the taxpayers'), THE ABUSERS OF PUBLIC OFFICE & PUBLIC FACILITIES. All were/are relying on the Intellectual Prostitutes, from within the media, to keep it all in the family closet.
  • All, as typical twin-tongue hypocrites carry on complaining about the media for failing to report & for suppressing the facts and the realities they allegdely reported to the hard of hearing, to the otherwise committed angels blowing their silent trumpets for decades, all ready and gearing to welcome the expansion of the New World Order.
  • Of such parts the contributions from and failings of the persons we name and expose, AS IF THEIR OWN SILENCE, THEIR FAILURES  & THEIR BLUNT OBSTRUCTIONS to the work and other actions by the creator of this website, Andrew Yiannides, treated by one and all as if non-existent with the exception when the wily Norman Scarth, set off to abuse the trust he was allowed to benefit from, while his parts and questionable activities / performance were under scrutiny, specifically after HE FAILED to publish the full transcript of the Court of Appeal hearing HE WAS ALLOWED TO RECORD* [*Link from here to the food for thought page created by Andrew Yiannides, in the first instance].
  • Not one ever bothered to address the issues we expose in the explicit page, despite the fact that we have been pointing all of our contacts, since May 1992, to it all.
  • Visitors, readers and researchers are urged / invited to access and read the letter which the Hon. Secretary of the Litigants In Person Society, Mr. Norman Scarth sent to the founder of human-rights, Mr. Andrew Yiannides, reproduced in the page .org/4deceit.htm* [*L]
  • The author's statements, such as 'what for and why seek additional assistance', thereby spelling out his parts as a lover of it all.
  • Common sense dictates, that he should have directed his request to his partners in deceptions aplenty, one & all engaging in fraudulent misrepresentations AND NOTED TO HAVE, WILFULLY, BEEN SUPPRESSING, FROM THE TAXPAYERS, THE FACTS OF LIFE RELATIVE TO THE RAMPANT ABUSE OF THE COURTS FACILITIES as the failure of all to co-operate as covered and pointed to at:- [*L]. One and all fallen to the facilities for fraud aplenty on the taxpayers and the corruption of illiterates in law, the conditioned victims of the legal circles & courts who fall to the blackmail element attached to the REWARD for keeping the realities away from the taxpayers; just like the media and the Ministers responsible for the application of long existing law to the criminal activities we cover in our pages, do.
  • All the while one and all were / are engaging in the scenarios we cover in the exclusive page, which page the author of the letter which Mr Norman Scarth sent to Andrew Yiannides, afforded us the opportunity to address the issue of the contributions of his partners and affiliates in fraud aplenty on the taxpayers; despite the reminder one and all, named in the new page simply shoved it all in the dark corners of their devoid of grey matter skulls, their perverted / corrupted mind(s)

> MOST IMPORTANT <
On Sunday morning, the 19th September 2010, the Deputy Prime Minister, leader of the Liberal-Democrats in the course of the BBC TV politics programme, spoke of the coalition government's commitment to address the element of waste and fraud through the public services sector. We trust and hope that the elements we expose in our pages and the parts adopted by the conditioned victims of the legal circles, the persons who engage in PROMOTING & EXPANDING THE ONGOING CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUD ON THE TAXPAYERS, THROUGH ABUSE OF THE COURTS' FACILITIES, will be on the top of the list of government priorities.
Visitors, readers & researchers are urged to access the letters to Minister Frank Field [*L] after he had been directed by the Prime Minister to think/do the unthinkable.
Link also from here [*L] to the explicit letter to the Home Secretary in December 1998 with submissions arising out of the RAMPANT HOUSING BENEFIT FRAUD
On Tuesday 23rd November 2010, 'the Guardian' in its Comment & Debate page carried an article by Nick Clegg, the Deputy Prime Minister. In the evening of the same day the Deputy Prime Minister addressed a large audience at Kings place in respect of the government's changes on university students fees / loans.
Access from here the page where we reproduce an image of 'the Guardian' article & consider the simple fact that we, alone, have been asserting and proclaiming our objections to the theft of funds from the national budget leading to the ever-increasing annual deficit in the state's balance of payments.

ACCESS:  http://www.justice-uk.human-rights.org/ (For an important message at this Community-on-Line web-site) & thereafter,
Access also http://www.law.society.complaints.and.human-rights.org/ (Judge instigates Fraud On Tax Payers - he knows not the difference between 'imposed' & 'no undue influence'). APOLOGIES FOR THE DISAPPEARANCE OF THIS WEBSITE.It appears that the beneficiary of the work, both for applications to the courts in the United Kingdom and the submissions to the European Court for Human Rights* [*Link from here to the Statement of Facts submitted to the ECoHR], arranged with the providers of the free web space to erase the Intellectual Property of Andrew Yiannides, the founder of the human-rights Community-on-Line, without any reference to the creator of the website and owner of the Intellectual Property!
鼯font> Copyright subsists on all material in our web-site, owned by the authors of same.
Visitors can refer to these pages in any non commercial activity, so long as attribution is given as to source. License to use, for commercial or other specific use of the material, shall have been secured in writing first, from the owners of any property and material from these pages. No material shall be reproduced in any form and by any means without prior agreement and or license in writing from the copyright owners. The Press are invited to contact us if they wish to publish material in the Public Interest, As We Do.
For any problems or questions regarding this web-site contact:  webmaster
...