dadscare.htm KEY Page
Changes 26 Oct. 2006
||Dads Care - Proof *Page created December 1998 &
Released late November 2005*
|Page is DEDICATED also
HELP US TO HELP YOU PLEASE (*Link to plea). JOIN
OTHERS FOR COMMON ACTIONS BORN AND RESTING ON COMMON
INDUSTRY VICTIMS can JOIN and CONTRIBUTE THEIR INPUT at:
(Coax the International Community - the JURY
to JUDGE the JUDGES *)
THE SERIOUS CAN APPLY TO JOIN URrights@yahoogroups
& New Material
JOIN Others On Line and publish your Statement of Facts with the Evidence
you have. (Community on Line member's case at the European
Court on Human Rights - paves the way TO PLEAD VIOLATIONS caused through abusive use of
the courts in allegedly civilised Democratic States) Use your rights in law (link) and ACT, with others, against the offenders. Chip in for the creation of the
mass of evidence against abusers of public office : the
abductors and rapists of Justice. You can then benefit from THE EVIDENCE, the DATA you
will help establish. It can all be used in any action, severally or jointly with others,
as the case may be . Crimes against humanity are not ruled out when a
large number of citizens can come up with evidence and as victims concur and or expand
upon on the FACTS STATED & The VIOLATIONS PLEADED as
LODGED at the ECoHR, already.
Andrew apologises to friends who joined him for the common cause at
concerned victims, for the developments after www.ning.com introduced NEW terms for the provision of the facility. Andrew
was informed that the existing material on line could be downloaded BUT the facility WAS
OBSTRUCTED by the very people ning.com NOTE PLEASE that URrights as a domain had
evidently been registered by 'unknown' as a DOT COM domain LET common sense
determine as to who & above all WHY?
INTRODUCTION to page
DUTY to REPORT CRIME
INVITATION to victim dads
FAX - challenging the C.S.A
Of SIMILAR DISPOSITION
Contempt to EVIDENCE
Contempt to LAW
Need to APPEAL - FRAUD
Processes Posted LATE
Principles of Citizens RIGHTS
PAGE CHANGES - ListLinks & Bookmarks to page
New Layout & Add Material
ElementContempt to Evidence
Haringey Police - H/B Fraud
V. B. Foden - Mortgage
V. B. Foden - Divorce
V. B. Foden-Solicitor Case
Contempt to Law
Enfield Council - C. Court
Hackney Council - C. Court
Haringey Council - C. Court
Haringey Police - H/B Fraud
Len Miskulin - Divorce
V. B. Foden - Mortgage
Len Miskulin - Divorce
P. Constantinou - Divorce
V. B. Foden - Financial
Haringey Council-H/B Fraud
PERJURY - Used
V. B. Foden-Solicitor Case
P. Constantinou - Divorce
Crown Prosecution Service
Court of Appeal - R.B.Del C
Helen Patey - Assertions
Divorce Frauds Challenged
V. B. Foden - Plymouth
A Barrister's tribulations with the Law
Society & the courts prompted him to write a book which he then shoved in the family
closet. (*Link to the explicit page where we expose the realities
suppressed by the victim and his chums. READ of their evil in essence activities).
|A letter to 'The Times'
*Link from here to the
content of the letter on the right in HTML text.
The editor's response
Mrs Average -all parents- should consider the realities & conclude accordingly, and IF
the revelations we point to in our page on the MEDIA any decent parent and tax
contributor could possibly ignore such arrangements by the fraudsters in control of a
|The email below should clarify the all important element of connecting &
co-operating for common causes as the content of the email discloses.
|An explicit web-page was
created based on 'The Sun'* article as commanded of any 'true human and thinker'
who bothers to 'consider such realities as the email relates to. [*Link]
last updated: June 20, 2012
reconstruction for better navigation
VISITORS ARE URGED to access and READ THE IMPORTANT
update and ADDENDA we were obliged to introduce in January 2002.
We had no choice but to REPORT THE CRIMES TO THE TREASURY.
Our observations and knowledge of the constructive frauds made us accessories if we kept
quiet, like the alleged victims who work towards the implementation of the schemes by the
abductors and rapists of Justice, the Goddess. You will find the addenda statement at
the top of the Updated Pages File. We are sure that you will share with us our concerns
and most profound disappointment at and with persons who adopt and promote activities
which they know are nothing but downright crimes. We refer to
our exclusive page where we expose (as conscientious law abiding citizens) the Confidentiality Between Fraudsters that
exists care of the BEST OPEN SECRET. Visitors, readers and researchers are urged to access
the additional material and evidence that proves ORGANISED FRAUD BY PERSONS IN AUTHORITY. (*Direct
link from here to the proof).
Guidelines for Navigating
through the extensive material: access
instructions. The first step for visitors to acquaint themselves with the
extensive material should be to use the SEARCH FOR facility. Just
type in any word or combination of words / issues that are of concern / interest - need
information and our views about. Remember that our views rest on factual experiences and
research with evidence in support. We urge visitors and in particular victims of the legal
circles and the Law Enforcement Agencies to access the introduction page to the Community
on Line concept and facilities should use [*Link].
For further clarification /
information email: webmaster@
EXTRACT FROM A LETTER (Dad
Read here of fatherly concerns
and below of advice to pupils of a Secondary Modern
Comprehensive in the London Borough of Islington.
'It is easy, for you to forget that mother had
been at home, unlike ALL the other ‘females’ within your known family circles. She was
looking after your brother and you, because I WANTED for you to benefit from that which I
NEVER HAD. I also gave you the best I could afford on top of all the love I never had. It
was dad who kept it all together, on his own, through hard work. I would even work
evenings and weekends when the occasion arose in order to improve the life of all and to
buy a house and do my best to ‘turn it into a real home for all’. Mum had other ideas
and documents establish the facts. It was dad who bought each of his children a computer
each and it was dad who spent time with both of them, after work and weekends, for a
while, in order to teach them how to use their computers. Mum who was at home with you all
day never bothered, however. Do you remember ‘The Naughty Boy" changed to "The
Naughty Girl" in a few seconds? I do!
My dearest Artemis, it was not dad who walked out on you, it was mother with and because of others who ‘guided
and USED her all the way’ as will be revealed. Others interfered because of their own
self-interests. They interfered first in my career and in OUR home and what was a family,
properly constituted and maintained by dad. It was mum with assistance from others who
walked out taking her lifeless (as she treated HER children) possessions with her. Easy to
forget that mum would drag you and your brother out of any other room I entered too,
whenever I entered her kingdom and paradise.
Easy to overlook
the fact that mum used your brother and you because in accordance with Western Civilised
Culture (which she experienced in the mid 1970’s, in the break up of one of my best
friend's home and family) children are nothing but a woman’s personal lifeless
jewels, the Social Workers so determine (*F2). You should read
Frank Schaeffer’s book "Dancing Alone" and you will then understand why he
refers to them as "The only glaziers in town going around smashing windows". To
that I add "For the benefit of the organisers of it all, the criminals in the legal
Easy to forget
that, I even had to call at your school in order to leave with the
office staff a birthday card to be passed on to you, by the staff. I had no choice because
mother, and you, arranged for me not to know of your whereabouts. On the occasion I was
told that mum, allegedly, had a court order for me not to get anywhere near her
possessions. I did ask you to borrow and read Terence Frimsby’s book "Outrageous
Fortune"; it is obvious that you did not bother. There exist letters my
dearest daughter about the assertions from the teachers and the school office staff. They
mocked and laughed at me. Whosoever advised mum to indulge in such scenarios, naively and
foolishly believed that I would be ‘stupid enough to waste my years in the legal system
like Terence Frimsby. They expected of me to give the criminals in the legal system
chances to DEFRAUD both your mother, with your brother and you suffering much more pain
than you have had to endure what was IMPOSED ON US ALL by others who were using mother.'
The above is dedicated
to the following dens of criminals:
- The Law Society
- The London Borough of Waltham Forest & its Social Services Department
- The Family Services Unit supported & recommended by the above - L.B.W.F
- The circles who finance the above Unit other than the budget rapists of the L.B.W.F
- The police as maintained and propped up by the L.B.W.F
- The Mediation Service
- The staff and officers at Bow County Court
- The Lord Chancellor's Department that maintains criminals as alleged Public Servants
- The Police Complaints Authority fraudsters who promote waffle & fail to look into
serious matters reported to them.
- The Treasury that meets the salaries of criminals
who indulge as covered in an exclusive page [*Linked
to from here]
Read below of SPECIFIC
RIGHTS FOR THE CITIZENS & OBLIGATIONS FOR THE STATES that signed up to the European
Convention on Human Rights, as the atrocities of the Second World War came to an end and
the causes of the European tragedy were taken to task.
ARTICLE 2 of the FIRST PROTOCOL TO THE
CONVENTION specifically provides: "No person shall be denied the
right to education. In the exercise of any functions which it assumes in relation to
education and to teachings, the State shall respect the right of the parents to
ensure such education and teaching in conformity with their own religious and
The above provisions relate and point to the fact that the most
offensive and horrendous of atrocities that were at the epicentre of the most destructive
of human interactions and relations, in recent history, 'The Holocaust', mankind has been
hearing of and reading about, for some 70 years. No decent 'human' could ever be asked to
ignore or overlook such well documented activities which the founder of human-rights has
been referring to as the folly of follies and the most blunt of 'man's inhumanity to man'
crimes. Many the hypocrites who excel in pointing to the very crimes, ever since, while in
arranged ignorance of past atrocities and crimes on a much bigger scale. The element
that we point to here, however, happens to be the fact that the Jews, as a people, were
targeted because of their Religious Beliefs and orientation, hence the above provision,
when drafting the European Convention for Human Rights, in 1948 and at the same time,
on parallel lines The Universal Declaration by the United Nations.
We request of and URGE OUR VISITORS / READERS to consider the very
elements related in the father's letter to his daughter [above] and WE BEG ONE AND
ALL CONCERNED PARENTS to read the letter from Mr Kadleigh of Bristol to the editor of 'The
Times'. The editor did oblige the readers of 'The Times', by printing Mr Kadleigh's
letter, pointing to 'the craft-y hypocrite', who decided to let the readers of the
newspaper read of the PRINCIPLES the Hellenes were rearing / raising their children by
adhering to such principles; principles which the very craft-y who have been
organising all PSEUDOdemocracies -for centuries- set out to bury well over a millennium
and a half ago, as any well informed 'researcher and student of past history', could not
possibly ignore or overlook, provided, naturally, the information was / is at hand. All
visitors access from here the quote from Isocrates'
'Aeropagiticos' in our quotes page.
Reference in Mr Kadleigh's letter to 'the birth of our
civilisation', when in fact the author of the letter and the hypocrite who
published Mr Kadleigh's letter, should and ought to have been aware of the fact that the
Hellenes and their civilisation had been targeted for burial and elimination, care of
ploys and the machinations of 'the craft-y who created the alleged creator of all and
everything through their vile scenarios and scripts, which the fraudsters attributed to
the alleged one and only who needed assistance from others IN ORDER TO PUT AN END to that
which the sons of men had been achieving, as related in the most clear of the examples
copied from their vile creation in one of our pages, linked to from
here; there the TRUE LIFE SCENARIOS we cover in the page, cross-relate and match
to a 't' the Old Testament vile scenario, simply because the participants in, the creators
of the scripts and the directors of 'the theatrical shows in the courts', in our days, are
followers of the teachings by examples stated in the Old Testament.
Reference to the father's letter, to the very editor in January
1996, linked to from here, should clarify a thing or two and
raise the question: "Why suppress the concerned father's input for the average reader
of 'The Times'?" Most must have been and be of above average aptitude and ethical
approach to the rest of society in states / societies where the craft-y and the wily with
malice aforethought suppress the truth of anything that could be beneficial and high on
the agenda of alleged beacons and of considerable influence in shaping the society the
craft-y recklessly and with fraudulent intentions have wilfully been pushing down and
deeper into the dark caves of chaos where the followers and promoters of the teachings, by
examples stated in the vile Old Testament- congregate.
References in the father's letter to the realities in our days, when
approaching the dawn of the 21st century and who; also from which quarters the
arrangements for 'the sons of men' to be the targeted non-entities who should be subjected
to such tribulations as the young teenager and many other boys were subjected to care of
such maligned and evil persons as the Headteacher, one Mr Freed, and a feminasty, one Ms
Darling blatantly discriminated against the boys and encouraged the 'young amazon' through
contempt of the law and blunt defaults in the exercise of their alleged public duties,
when endorsing and promoting 'the politically correct discrimination' the father covered
in the letter published below. Readers are directed from here to
the letter the father wrote to his son, on his 16th birthday and kept his promise that
the content of the letter to the Headteacher would not be released / made known to the son
before then. It is for the average reader to recognise why the father did not wish for the
young victim of blunt and arrogant discrimination on gender grounds NOT TO BE INFLUENCED
IN A NEGATIVE WAY >encourage the boy to adopt the wrong attitude towards his teachers.
ARTICLE 14 of THE
CONVENTION specifically provides: "The enjoyment of the rights
and freedoms set fourth in this convention shall be secured without
discrimination on any grounds such as sex, race, colour, language,
religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin,
association with a national minority, property, birth or other status".
The above cross relate to the atrocities and the crimes committed
against the Jews by the Nazi war-mongers. The most essential of provisions that emerges
here, however, is the simple factor that there shall not be 'any' positive discrimination
(pre planned or organised as was with the case for 'The Jewish Holocaust', crimes). The
extent and comprehensiveness of this Article was one of the gems that attracted the
attention of young Andrew when he first read the European Convention while a student at
'The English School', Nicosia, Cyprus.
Readers / visitors are requested to access the father's letter to Mr
H. Freed, the Headteacher at Leytonstone School, 1992. Leytostone School, just another
establishment churning out products of the New World Order of the days as arranged by the
London Borough of Waltham Forest, a typical PSEUDOdemocratic set-up; another beehive
churning out nymphets, amazons and encouraged >through teachings and convenient
failures to correct wrongs, such as the unacceptable activities 'girls were / are
encouraged to engage and indulge in such, as the young Alexandros Kimon was subjected to,
for far too long<. Subjected to 'arranged by example teachings', young Alexandros Kimon
was, that is, until the explicit letter was delivered by the father who did not approve of
such regimes as the Politcally Correct blind were / have been imposing on societies in all
Pointed to the arrogant Mr H. Freed, to 'the well-qualified' New
World Order farm animals creator, the realities at Leyton School churning out NOT HUMANS,
not thinkers. Everything care of the regime the Politically Correct have been imposing on
the targeted victims of such states as the 'Politically Correct generate and 'create
conditioned sheeple', the new generations of 'conditioned sheeple' and programmed
robots; 'the conditioned farm animals', most definitely NOT HUMANS. Most typical the
examples covered by the states young Alexandros Kimon was being subjected to at
Leytonstone School, care of the encouraged nymphet and the young amazon at the epicentre
of the realities the father HAD NO CHOICE BUT TO ADDRESS through his explicit letter to
the arrogant Mr. H Freed, the Headteacher.
In the explicit letter to Mr H Freed, clearly stated the realities
the teenager Alexandros Kimon was subjected to; clearly stated also, the recognition of
the fact that Mr H Freed and all under him, most definitely, were creating and using
'feminasties for the new World Order States', as organised and arranged by the followers
and the promoters of the Old Testament teachings, by the creators of all allegedly
civilised states, all PSEUDOdemocracies. Many the victims of organised and premeditated
(care of such school regimes as Mr H Freed was presiding over) arrangements / regimes for
the targeted 'sons of men'. Overseeing it all, well-qualified products of the New
World Order, such as the shyster who failed, elected
not to attend personally the scheduled meeting with the parents of the victim of the
policies the school was serving for the Politically Correct Hypocrites operating out of
and on directives from the London Waltham Forest. No 'human', NO GREY MATTER USER
>THINKER< could possibly fail to recognise that the shyster elected not to attend
the scheduled meeting after reading the letter which the concerned father settled and
delivered to the office at Leytonstone School, in the afternoon of the previous day. The
objective of the concerned father, was for Mr H Freed to read and take on board the loud
messages before attending the scheduled meeting with the father who used his rights to put
on record the realities born of and attached to the regime ongoing at Leytonstone School.
Creating the divorce industry products from children through
teenagers to 'immature stooges -non thinkers- of both sexes' was the most crucial of
thoughts in the father's mind. The father did encounter many 'typical stooges and
sucker-serfs', over the years he spent in researching and studying / observing the many
stooges who were sent along, or of their own contacted him, in order to abuse the trust
one and all benefited from, when acting as self-centred dreamers who were chasing simply
the cash under the table we point to in our pages. We cover more than enough about such
dreamers, some of whom were noted to be acting and operating as hooked to the bait 'of the
cash under the table' specifically covered the exclusive page and supplemented in a number
of other pages. We point also to the fact that one such person (others too) even came
along after accepting the TERMS FOR THE REWARDS TO VICTIMS OF THE LEGAL CIRCLES, as his
solicitors wrote to another solicitor; and the author of the said letter we point to from here, did, earlier, engage in the rampant Housing
Benefit Fraud we cover and expose in our pages also. Needless to say the targeted
victims of the organised fraud were rendered helpless care of alleged servants of the
public who engaged in the promotion and maintenance of the criminal activities through breaches
of public duty and contempt for the law as covered in the explicit affidavits published in
our pages, such as the page linked to from here.
The news item below with compliments to Mr
Len Miskulin who elected (?) to ignore the challenges lodged at court as
settled by Andrew Yiannides, for Mr. Miskulin. He departed to Croatia, however, never to
contact Andrew again while maintaining contact with many others as a typical abuser of
trust whose aims were to serve the plans of others, not what he agreed with Andrew
Yiannides to work for. Through such convenient defaults, the abused court facilities and
the powers that be flourish, as transpired in the course of the gathering at Mr Miskulin's
residence when another venue / event was on the cards than the one Mr Yiannides was
invited to attend for.
|*Link from here to the page where
we cover the aforesaid events and thereby qualify the aforesaid conclusion 'Another Venue
Was On The Cards', as subsequent activities and the convenient defaults by Shaun O'Connor,
who volunteered to keep the minutes established'
*Link also from here to the page where we published the
explicit challenges to the abusers of the courts facilities in the matter of the used
'gestation vessel' for the impositions on targeted Len Miskulin, whose rights to know if
he actually did father the two children the abusers of the 'family courts facilities had
embarked upon' in contempt of the law and in particular the 'assured equality of the
The above headline, on 28th November 2005, is the tip of the
Such records simply establish the
arrogant positive discrimination & the invisible services, the
reckless discrimination against 'targeted sucker-serfs'. We hasten to point to the case of
Mr. Len Miskulin who sought DNA tests but was messed about by abusers of public office,
judicial chair occupants. The explicit pleadings that were settled by Andrew Yiannides as
lodged at court by him -soon after he contacted us- were addressing the blunt positive
discrimination that is manifest through the courts. Sadly we have to point out that the
victim had other plans than the objectives he promoted to us. Readers must access the page where we state realities no one can overlook / ignore and wake
image below to all victims of the organised break-up of families
care of the abused Social Services and the multitude of ancillary facilities promoted by
abusers of trust and public office, as 'social services to the public' in all
allegedly civilised 'modern.... PSEUDOdemocracies'.
Yiannides got to know of the arrangements, in place, -for 'mankind'- in the early and mid
1970s. Abusers of 'the created amenities were noted to be most proactive in the
break-up of a targeted family, the family of one of his closest friends in London; the
family was benefiting from 'the convenient facilities' offered to 'the gestation vessel'
Andrew's friend had been married to, long enough to create five new lives', five
the victims. Of such background and a beneficiary, one Len Miskulin; Mr Miskulin*
was introduced to Andrew Yiannides by Mr Dave Ellison, after one Duncan*
'discovered' the material facts and >realities< published by Andrew in the
public domain, at the human-rights.demon.co.uk web-site.
from here to explicit material >revelations<, attached
to the victim, Len Miskulin's experiences
*Link also from here to another 'male' victim of the family break-up industry,
>to another discarded sperm-provider / dildo< and read what that victim discovered
as a long suffering 'OBSTRUCTED FATHER, a discarded dildo and WAKE UP SERFS.
*Link from here to the email from Duncan -in the left margin panel- received
after Duncan benefited from articles & submissions by Andrew, a contributor, to a
number of newsgroups; the submissions and the web-site material warranted and
called-for because of the absolute need to expose and challenge abusers of public office
|*Link from here to the background, as to 'WHY THE NEED to
create permanent material in the public domain, on the Internet'? The absolute need
arose after the creator of the website, Andrew Yiannides, recognised the validity of 'the
disputed protocols'. The criminal activities ongoing at and within the Royal Courts of
Justice -between 1972-1979- established beyond any doubt the fallacy of the fraudulently
misrepresented ''judges' independent of any other influences, in the mother of modern
Democracies >the UK PSEUDOdemocracy<. Most definitely the judiciary / judges within
the Royal Courts of Justice (RCJ) were following the teachings by examples stated in the
most vile of works ever to have been misrepresented to mankind, 'The Old Testament'. The
creator of the website material did discard 'The Old Testament scripts and scenarios' as
vile and evil before his teen years, before reaching his 11th birthday. The absolute need
to challenge and expose abusers of trust and public office arose, specifically after
considering the simple fact that the legal circles, allegedly Honourable officers of the
Supreme Court, were impostors who systematically 'imposed on the targeted suckers-serfs',
the long existing plans of the successors and followers of the teachings by examples
stated in the Old Testament and more specifically AS ARRANGED / ORGANISED by the creators
and followers of the plans on record as ''The Protocols'. Andrew naively accepted 'the
protocols' to be false as the fraudsters who have been suppressing many truths have been
asserting ever since Sergei Nilus published, in Russia at the turn of the 20th century,
'the very Protocols' which Andrew elected to refer as 'the plans of the wily and craft-y'.
*Link from here to the explicit words from 'the disputed
Protocols', and note what the creators of the disputed documents, put on record and
Nilus Sergei, on discovering 'the plans of the wily and craft-y', made public by
publishing the offensive ideas from criminal minds, whether accepted as plans to be
implemented or as the plans of dreamers. WHEN ONE PARALLELS REALITIES to the plans
depicted in 'the Protocols' one has no choice but to use grey matter and consider
'reviewing conditioned beliefs'.
'discarded dildos' fathers are targeted and subjected to the usual
'run of the mill operations' by the 'fraudulently misrepresented services, as dispensed
with and used by alleged servants of the public and the law', NOT FORGETTING THE
CONVERTS : the corrupted who join the fraudsters-club after signing on the dotted
line; refer to our exclusive page, linked to from here and wake up sucker-serfs. And the
media Barons as puppeteers who control the Intellectual Prostitutes dangling on their
strings, materialisation of the plans of the fraudsters behind it all; the herding the
sheeple straight to the New World Order plans for mankind, total control of 'the
conditioned, the ill-educated non-thinkers, >the created sucker-serfs and
|*Link from here to a page from explicit submissions to Bow County
Court when the gestation vessel in Andrew's life was being used by the abusers of
the courts facilities, as others arranged and prepared the gestation vessel for.
The others themselves obliging the creators of the states, the legal circles and other
public servants, who collectively abuse public facilities in order for the maligned, the
envious and the spiteful to use the created FALSE STATES, as informed and used tools TO
& FOR THE GOALS of all > the users and the used -the
last to benefit as assured tools, at the expense of the targeted sucker-serf, 'the
idiot, who dared to challenge and instigate legal proceedings against 'protected
'fathers' -discarded dildos and sperm providers- at some time have had the 'pleasure of
encounters with the administrators of long existing 'plans for the sons of men'; 'mankind'
would be a better word, but as the 'males only' (in the main) are the targeted sucker-serfs' we rather stick to the original script as
delivered to mankind over two millennia ago by wily fraudsters.
decades -as of the days when Andrew Yiannides was witnessing the break-up of the family of
his friend, Michael-, what the alleged servants of the public and the law -from the
police through to judicial chair occupants- engaged in, was altogether too obvious to
grey matter users, to >THINKERS<.
destruction was part of the agenda served by the organisers of 'the human family'; the
family, as conceived and executed by committed followers, administrators and executioners
of the plans of the creators of the New World Order communities, societies and all
PSEUDOdemocracies, promoted as the genuine article by the Media Barons and the
Intellectual Prostitutes they retain and maintain*
from here to acknowledgement of the imposed states on 'the
conditioned sheeple', on the victims of organised fraud aplenty through abuse of the
courts' facilities and as 'sucker-serfs' they have taxes imposed on them for such
of the New World Order for mankind, also, many misguided, ill-educated, misinformed and or
otherwise committed politicians who are sucked into the ways of the fraudsters who came
along 2300 years ago with the vile scripts and scenario -the alphabet- from which the
creation of the three languages, tongues pointed to at http://www.justiceraped.org/2011/06/334
as presented to mankind by Andrew Yiannides, the creator of these pages for thinkers to
consider and WAKE-UP.
creator of the human-rights material, in the public domain -on the Internet- after 39
years of research and investigations -1972-201- resting and founded on 'the blunt abuse
of the courts facilities', by licensed criminals -the legal circles- in the United
Kingdom*, it was time to point to the connection between the abusers of the courts
facilities and THE ROOT OF THE EVIL mankind has been and is being subjected to for
centuries / millennia.
|*Link from here to one of the
disputed Protocols attributed to the elders of Zion and wake-up sucker-serfs. The
material in the page points to suppressed realities which the fraudsters, the successors
of the creators of the Old Testament vile scripts and scenarios, also the followers of
such rubbish, through 'crimes against humanity aplenty', over the last two millennia, set
out to destroy and suppress, as if control of all and everything was ever possible, when
one deals with 'true humans and the human spirit'.
from here to an explicit quote form the New Testament.
In the page we point to, the material relates to study and research on the disputed
'protocols' and recorded realities no one can discard while promoting the Old Testament
vile scripts and scenarios as alleged Holy Scriptures.
*Link from here to another explicit quote form the New Testament and
thereat consider making time to 'study' our page / representations and submissions born of
research on the disputed 'Protocols of the Elders of Zion'.
very root has been and IS MOST CLEARLY POINTED TO IN OUR PAGES*
from here to an explicit extract / script from the
creation of criminals, promoted for centuries / millennia as alleged Holy Scriptures by
fraudsters and followers and promoters of such vile scripts
scenario, as copied, is from the most vile of works ever to have been misrepresented to
mankind -to the conveniently ill-educated and the misinformed 'sheeple : the
WHAT THE ABUSERS OF THE LEGAL SYSTEM & THE COURTS FACILITIES ENGAGED IN SUBSEQUENTLY.
The victim, thanks to her parts as a fraud of a human -one of many- who were sent along to
abuse Andrew Yiannides' time and the patience he allowed her -and all others- to benefit
from WHILE HER / THEIR PARTS IN THE RAMPANT FRAUD ON THE TAXPAYERS, were noted, because of
the warranted need to EXPOSE the maintenance engineers created.
||*Link from here to the page where we publish a transcript from a hearing
at Barnet County Court - London, when 'the venue was for the registration of an alleged
judgement proper at the Employment Tribunal FOR THE COSTS IMPOSED BY THE ABUSES OF THE
TRIBUNAL'S FACILITIES thereafter for the targeted victim 'family' to benefit from the
enforcement of the judgement 'costs'. ALL AND EVERYTHING INTENDED TO lead to the
application, as intended by all, to the European Court for Human Rights and the rewards
under the table care of the arrangements in place FOR RAMPANT FRAUD ON THE TAXPAYERS,
as we point out in our explicit page, linked to from here. We simply repeat and
emphasise the simple fact that NOT ONE OF THE ALLEGED victim-challengers we name in our
pages were and have been working for the benefits the system affords to the THE CORRUPTED,
the most dangerous of the alleged humans created by the organisers of all
PSEUDOdemocracies. After reading the transcript simply consider the one and gibe-away
element "WHY DID THE HUSBAND OF THE VICTIM OF THE ABUSED EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNAL, VISIT
Andrew Yiannides and in the presence of Andrew's octogenarian mother and his sister
THREATEN TO BEAT ANDREW TO DEATH, if he was not part of the constructive fraud on the
taxpayers, on hearing of Andrew's intention to publish the transcript on the Internet? Why
the objections to the warranted need to ensure the taxpayers should read OF THE REALITIES
WE COVER and point to for all to refer and point all other taxpayers to the facts of life
in the UK, a typical PSEUDOdemocarcy? NOTE that the person who introduced 'the victim
family', Mr William Spring was informed of the threats; Mr Spring as a typical convert to
and lover of the suppression of the realities, SIMPLY IGNORED IT ALL while engaging in
many an alleged production for the benefit of the suckers who are drawn into the
labyrinths of intrigue and more often that not to deception aplenty.
FOR DECADES, the breaches of trust and the abuse of the courts facilities. As of the
days when Andrew had been 'the targeted victim & sucker-serf', care of the criminal
activities the legal circles, engaged and indulged in within the confines of the Royal
Courts of Justice. All and everything with the blessings of the police and Ministers in
the United Kingdom : a typical PSEUDOdemocracy.
||*Link from here to the
loud and clear the implications -a hint, through the material as presented in the webpage
when one considers WHICH LEGAL CASE and what the background to the case had been. More to
the point, WHAT THE CORRUPTED VICTIM (the used sucker-serf, 'a woman' of the Divorce
Industry) SET OUT TO DO FOR HER PARENTS and how the case was and remains a perfect
specimen for a typical 'Tower of Babel' scenario as hinted by the creators of the vile old
Testament rubbish and the alleged creator of all and everything some wily and craft-y
fraudsters concocted some 2500 years ago, the one who engaged with others in the scenario
/ script for the Tower of Babel makes most clear.
The facts of life in the United Kingdom were related in graphic
detail to the mother of the children Ms Kyriaki / Koulla Demetriou Evangelou, when their
mother, as a refugee from Cyprus, following the Turkish invasion of the island, sought
refuge in the United Kingdom where she had family. Details of the circumstances under
which the meeting and introduction to Miss Kyriaki / Koulla Demetriou Evangelou will be
related in due course as part of the revelations attached to and born of the organised
betrayal of the trust of the ordinary citizens of the Republic of Cyprus.
Poster delivered to the office of the school of the children after
'their loving mother' took them away, as part of her vile blackmailing practices at every
opportunity others created and used her for their own evil ends, as shall be established.
* The poster on the left SAYS IT ALL.
* The gestation vessel, -an alleged human- indulged in use of the children in
conjunction with her other long ongoing vile activities.
* Blackmail was the gestation vessel's renewed 'evil ploy'. As a typical abuser of
children she engaged in what others were guiding and 'using her' for, as 'the others' were
while anticipating of the father to simply rush to some fraudsters licensed by the Law
Society and thereby / thereafter simply the usual abuse of the courts facilities 'by
* It goes without saying that the targeting of family assets and the attached
'elimination of the sperm provider', from the children's lives, WAS THE MAIN OBJECTIVE OF
ONE & ALL, especially those who were using the gestation vessel for their own evil
ends in anticipation of the usual activities by the legal circles.
* One and ALL WERE VERY FAMILIAR WITH THE CRIMINAL ACTIVITIES ONGOING WITHIN THE
COURTS, care of blunt contempt of the law by the legal circles, who indulged at the
expense of Andrew the targeted 'sperm-provider', with the blessings of the police between
1969 and 1978, hence the conclusion on 'reliance'.
|Time for all users of the encouraged gestation vessel, Kyriaki/Koulla
Demetriou Evangelou, after the maligned parasite Constantine/Costas Kyriacou Joannides
interfered in the career and the rights of Andrew Yiannides, to climb down from cloud
|Immaterial if the maligned parasite was a used & encouraged
stooge or simply a product of the conspiracy he entered into with his partners in the fish
and chips business, the Antoniades' couple.
|Everything had been arranged between the parasite and the fraud of a
father of five -one Kyriacos Petrou Joannides- and the other two fraudsters Maria Kyriacou
Joannides-Antoniades & Savvas Kyriacou Petrou Joannides.
|ONE & ALL HAD BEEN & CARRIED ON RELYING* on the type of
public and legal services* the sucker-serfs benefit from, in ALL PSEUDOdemocracies,
care of the arrangements Andrew Yiannides has been exposing and challenging in the public
domain for years. [*Link
from here to evidence establishing the criminal activities by
alleged Honourable officers of the Supreme Court and other officers of the Law, in the
|BUT with the added element, that one and all were made aware of
the fact that Andrew had secured evidence in support of his conclusions, decades before
the evidence was released in the public domain, on the Internet.
articles by 'Diogenis' at http://www.justiceraped.org
and benefit from the realities suppressed for centuries
page is dedicated to three self appointed Freemason bashers. The
three (1) Mr James Todd, (2) Mr Maurice Kellett and (3) Mr. Paul Talbot-Jerkins, most
vociferous and outspoken in their ranting. Craft-y and conniving as all three turned out
to have been, while serving other plans. At best all three were / are serving the imposed
states in pseudo-democracies through their subliminal indoctrination promotions. We
explain the logic behind the aforesaid opinion: Each one in his own way simply repeats the
same opinions and ideas relentlessly and accuses the Freemasons, as a body and
organisation known and practising everywhere the 'policies and the Brotherhood's plans for
mankind as a self-promoting group of 'philanthropists'. None of them ever came up with any
evidence or proof that their opinions rest and are founded on solid ground or legitimate
foundations. In fact the effect of their ranting has a basis: That basis rests on the
repetitious (indirect) promotions of their assertions (and from other Freemason bashers)
collectively amounting to: "Don't do what I did and do, because they will do
to you, as they did to me". All came along complaining of the relentless
suppression of material facts and the activities AS INDULGED INTO BY THE LEGAL CIRCLES
& ENTERTAINED, *IF NOT INSTIGATED*, BY JUDICIAL CHAIR OCCUPANTS, while the media
barons and the IP's they retain just twiddle their thumbs. All
three were/are complaining of events and activities, within the courts, while promoting
their personal VIEWS & OPINIONS. Odd it never was that the most referred to and quoted
by all, was the Great Puke Production Machine, Mr. James Todd of VOMIT
Treatment) repute, who failed & fails to
honour his own undertakings.(*Details on request / email)
right to reply and to justify behaviour in general towards the founder of human-rights and
the work all three had and have access, also to justify their activities and their
arrogant defaults to apply their alleged concerns to matters we cover in our pages, to
which all three were pointed repeatedly do warrant and command justification. Anything
they may care to submit to us, will be published in this page and pointed to from other
pages. We will also publish any Logical or Legal Argument that shall arise out of their
submissions, as the situations command.
Read, below explicit submissions to the
letters editor of 'The Times' in 1996.
|The need to communicate, at the time, in the context of the
letter, arose when Dr. Tate came up with a 'brilliant idea' for the Department of
Education, in the United Kingdom. The idea simply: 'The Department should 'introduce its
own code of conduct and morals'. He cited, at the time, the failures of the three
main religions in the UK and PARENTS who fail to instil in the upbringing of children
appropriate guidance in such matters; it goes without saying that in view of dwindling
church attendance the lack of moral education was wrongly and with intent wilfully blamed
on religious leaders as well, not just the parents. The 'joke' that the Education
Authorities should introduce some code for the schools to implement IGNORED THE EXISTING
FOUL CONTRIBUTION by the education authorities & system in operation for decades as
the submitted and suppressed letter, from the concerned father who clearly stated the
FACTS & the REALITIES, imposed on 'the serfs'. It is for the reader & researcher
to consider the realities and the forces at work, after accessing 'the plans for the sons
of men' to which we point to in three explicit pages 1.
org/protocol.htm 2. org/humraped.htm
Read the text on the right
The above to the letters editor of 'The
Times'. His indifference to the issues pointed and covered as gross as they come.
The proof is in the response, as received, below.
Readers / visitors who publish in the
public domain are invited to contact us to exchange links in order to inform the world
jury of the evil plans to impose Dictatorial States on mankind everywhere.
|Below, in HTML, the content of the
letter to the editor of 'The Times', in January 1996.
16th January 1996
Your Ref.: School Chiefs Set Out New Codes of values.
FAX to: 0171-782-5046
The change of direction by the politically
correct has been long overdue. Any code of values ought to, and must be based on true
democratic principles. For far too long our teachers (and those guiding and or instructing
them) have concentrated on the individual and thereby promoting selfishness without any
respect for any other but one's self, values that extended to one's own needs, leading to
utter disregard for all others. All others alas, to include parents.
I recollect my son, at the ripe old age of
six asserting to me: "You can't talk to me like that, I HAVE RIGHTS'. It was sadly,
as a result of my having to tell him off for upsetting his mother. I was informed that HE
WAS TAUGHT OF SUCH matters at school. I simply took him to his room, put some of his
clothing in a plastic bag and told him that I was to take him to school the following
morning in order to deliver him up to his brilliant teachers and tell them that they would
be welcome to have him in their homes where he could practice his rights at their expense
and peace of mind. He begged me no to do so, for he did not want to 'upset' his teachers.
Odd that our politically correct, some
years ago had been proclaiming the colonies were not fit to govern themselves, even though
thousands of such far away lands had indeed studied in our universities. The very same
'boffins' assumed the right to interfere in the families and homes of their own citizens,
thus creating the society they wished to build. Sadly to discover rather belatedly, THEY
were wrong. Democracy without consensus? The individual who has more rights than the
majority he or she is affecting through his/her indulgences has been the penultimate
anathema imposed on the rest of us by the 'politically correct'.
65 Abbot's Park Road
|* Visitors / readers and CONCERNED
PARENTS must access Isocrates' words from 'Aeropagiticos' in our quotes page from here and consider the fact that the father's letter -above-
was not considered suitable for the average reader of 'The Times', as the letter from
Mr Kadleigh evidently was. Mr Kadleigh wrote of 'our civilisation' (!) as the
Letters Editor or the editor in chief of 'The Times' considered such an assertion as
factual, when in fact the editor of 'The Times' IF correctly educated, ought to have
known that such was NOT the case. Mr Kadleigh was writing of the Hellenes
-the Greeks to the disrespectful and to the vulgar- as the father who knew and had
recognised the realities behind the ongoing plans for mankind > the New World Order
< decades earlier. The father, however, wrote of 'the Politically Correct'
who have been imposing their evil ways in our days as followers of the Abductors and
Rapists of DEMOCRACY & JUSTICE; the latter have been imposing their vile
-used here as the anagram of evil- plans for humanity, as of the days
when fraudsters, 2300 years ago delivered their alleged Holy Scriptures and their
creation, the alleged creator of all and everything, to Ptolemy of Egypt under specific
circumstances. We urge all serious readers / researchers to access 'Diogenis' articles
at www.justiceraped.org/2011/06/334 and grasp
the implications attached to the creation of different tongues / languages / religions
born out of the same alphabet >the Old Testament RUBBISH. Thereat it is expected, at
the very least, of some readers to consider *WHY ignore the obvious*, when armed
with the words of Isocrates some 2 centuries and well over 1000 years before the
fraudsters were caused to go along with their vile creation to Ptolemy of Egypt. Access
from here confirmation, an
article By Sir Frederic Kennyon in the mid-1950s and do NOTE the fact
that creators of the Old Testament RUBBISH, did NOT present to mankind their vile scripts
in their own language, until after the third language -religion- failed to conquer Europe,
the continent targeted by the very followers and promoters of the alleged Holy Scriptures
and the alleged creator of all and everything. Odd that 10 years later -2006- the letters
editor of 'The Times' published the revealing letter from Mr. Frank Ryder of Stafford, -below- qualifying the most important of aspects in so far as the
Hellenic language goes and the folly of suppressing such realities when promoting the
partners of the fraudsters who created the alleged creator of all and everything, the
Romans and the language created centuries after the Hellenic civilisation was targeted for
'elimination and burial deep in the dark caves where the followers and promoters of evil
have been congregating for well over 2 millennia, at the very least.
Needles to say the retained and
controlled, by invisible forces, Intellectual Prostitute was simply serving and
promoting 'undeclared agendas for the serfs'; hence the reasons for 'the convenient
failure' to publish the letter for consideration by the 'sheeple' the I.Ps serve as 'good
shepherds'. Of such activities and arrogant failures to put to the 'sheeple' the facts
and realities FOR CHOICE. Of such services, by the programmed I.P's who simply adhere
to the guidelines in place, by their controllers. They simply work for the creation and
development of pseudo-democracies which the very Intellectual Prostitutes promote to the
ill-informed 'electorate' as if, the genuine article.
from here to explicit plans (in place for centuries /
millennia) by the criminals who set out to take control of all and everything on planet
Interestingly, it mattered not that
the I.P, at 'The Times', elected to ignore the above letter. Whether it was because of the
truths and the realities the author, a concerned father (*F1), put forward or because of the origins of
the author who wrote of the Dominions and the standard of education that Her Majesty's
Colonial Subjects had been benefiting from, including graduation from universities in the
United Kingdom, made no difference. It could have been a case of the origins of the
author but amazingly the I.P did publish a letter from a gentleman, who pointed to THE
ORIGINS of our (?) civilisation (!). The last, miraculously wrote of elements from the
very civilisation and culture that produced the author of the rejected / ignored letter.
From such practices & with such 'brilliant' Intellectual Prostitutes in key places,
the information channels fool the electorate & play havoc with the lives of the
ill-educated, the naive, the gullible and the conditioned -as with the stooges and morons
we name and expose in our pages as non-humans, arrogant dreamers, non-thinkers and
fraudsters-club-recruits, such as the products of the fraudulent court productions &
|As long as the plans of the masters progress through the arrangements
hatched up in the course of meetings between the controllers, non-elected manipulators,
all is fine and moving in the direction of the pre-planned total and absolute control,
from here to the conclusions of the founder of the
human-rights organisation as of 1972-1975
from here to evidence attached to >THE IN SECRET HATCHED UP
ARRANGEMENTS FOR THE SERFS< by persons who misrepresent themselves as if acting for
'the serfs / the taxpayers, after securing representation as typical hypocrites; their
activities relate to their own collective plans for the suckers-serfs they allegedly
represent. Among the hypocrites who misrepresent themselves the solicitor Kypros
Nicholas (*F3), who engaged in criminal
activities with other abusers of the legal system and the courts, leading to
the imposed criminal states on Andrew Yiannides that commanded the research and the
investigations ongoing for almost four decades (as of March 1972), by the concerned
father who authored the letter to the editor of 'The Times'.
from here to the page where we publish the blunt FORGERY
created and promoted for and in respect of a concocted defence to a claim issued out
of the High Court founded and resting on COMMERCIAL FRAUD.
also from here to a House of Lords ruling and deliberations -in 1940- when their Lordships
applied their considered views on matters pertaining to the duties of solicitors (as
officers of the Supreme Court), to the Court & Justice itself; also in respect of
matters that relate and point to CONSPIRACY as well as to elements that relate to
suppression of facts & realities by electing to remain silent and through silence
conscious imposition of wrongs and damages to third parties.
The above letter on the same issue of 'morals &
teachings'. The letters editor apparently knows of the civilisation many have been
attempting to bury for over 1700 years. In the meantime simply promotions of all manner of
falsehoods while the original GNOSIS ignored by the mainstream as arranged by education
chiefs in allegedly true Democratic states.
Below, the content of the letter (image on the left) in HTML for links to & from.
role in moral education
From Sergei Kadleigh, Bristol
Sir, Perhaps maxims would
be more appropriate than commandments. For example, something like the last five of the
150 maxims enshrined at the Temple of Apollo at Delphi, defining
the virtue of an ideal Greek at the time of the birth of our
civilisation: "In childhood learn good manners; in youth learn to
control your passions; in middle age learn to be just, in old age learn to
be a wise council; die without regret".
12 Miles Road, Clifton, Bristol.
And in 2006, ten years on, more concerns and debates on the subject of
education. The letters editor at 'The Times', the prestigious, published a gem from an
octogenarian who expressed his views on the Hellenes / the Greek language.
Dedicated to the ill educated sheeple; to all serfs, victims' of
alleged servants of the public & the Law in allegedly civilised Democracies
|Below the content of the letter to the editor of 'The
Times', as published on 15th July 2006.
Recent letters about
Latin in Education raise a case of non omnia possumus omnes.
I took Latin at school
nearly 70 years ago, and its only use has been to establish snob status in conversations.
I could have done without Latin and without French - both are singularly useless to the
development of the mind.
Oh, that I had taken
Greek! I have been trying to learn it for the past 20 years, but my old brain simply will
not retain it. I struggle to read the Ancient writers in my original texts.
Greek opens doors on
matters of principle, not only in our European languages but in our Western heritage and
thinking; our arts, sciences, religions, politics and life attitudes. Greek humanism
proposes that "Man is the measure of all things". We forget it at our peril.
The purpose of education
is the rediscovery of such matters of principle. Education differs from training, which is
about conditioning. People can be trained to use a gun, or to worship fairies or to speak
French, but you cannot educate them to do so.
creator of these pages thanks Mr Ryder and the letters editor of 'The Times' for
recognition of the suppressed realities <<
NOTE: The messages from Mr Ryder, from
Andrew Yiannides to the wily Norman Scarth whose teachers taught him the K.I.S.S.
Need one to
point visitors to the wilful suppression of the views of a concerned father of Hellenic /
Greek origins, whose contribution on matters of education, 10 years earlier*, was
suppressed by 'The Times'? [*access
from here -above- the suppressed letter, released in our pages in
Below article, for the Highburian, by the concerned father who wrote to the editor of 'The
in 1996] relates
to teachings through examples and experiences from life. It is in HTML format, for links
to and from the text.
THE NEED FOR RULES
I have had the opportunity to work with some of you
recently. The big question at the school, as you probably know, made headlines in the
National Press. This remains an element which no one can overlook. The fact that the
matter is addressed and openly debated is a very healthy sign indeed and a most
encouraging element for all concerned.
Observing and talking
with some of you I felt that I should relate a personal experience which may well prove to
be food for thought for all you Highburians caught in the eternal ‘battle of the
Two years ago my own
young son pleaded for a video console system because most of his classmates had one. The
fact that for years he owned a computer which accepted its own video game cartridges was
irrelevant. He had to have the same console as the other boys at school so that he could
discuss with them the various ‘moves’ and ‘tricks’. Mother relented eventually and
after he spent hours on end trying out his ‘skills’ in front of the television at the
expense of the other more important matters, such as his lessons, ignoring also the
ensuing arguments with other family members because of the relentless and repetitive
noises produced with each success and failure.
Mother begun to get angry
at his failures to recognise he was infringing on the rights of others while I pretended
to go along with him and expressed interest in everything he was trying to do. I asked him
‘to educate me’ and to enlighten me as to what he was attempting to do and why.
Finally mother could no longer tolerate the relentless noises from the television set; she
made her views known in very clear terms. She was going to take away the console and
dispose of that intruder in our lives. Our son had to accept the inevitable; his right to
enjoy himself had been infringing on the rights of other family members. The bad side
effects of his right to enjoy himself did trespass on to the rights of the majority (which
included his younger sister). The situation could no longer be ignored.
It was the right time for
me to express my views and to ‘educate him’ using his own chosen medium; that infernal
video console. I pointed out to my son that: ‘Just Like The Rules He Had To Accept And
Go Along With, In order To Move From Level To Level In Each Video Game, So It Is In Life
At Home, And At School AND At Work. And In Every Other Area of Human Endeavour. I also
informed him that the other species besides the human animal, on our planet, developed
their own orderly and organised existence, which are governed by logical rules. As one
obeys the rules and makes the right moves in each video game, so one has to obey society’s
established rules and make the right moves at home, at school, at college, at university
and at work for an orderly progression to take effect.
It is through acceptance
and compliance with each game rule at each level hat one moves on to the next stage and
level. Consider these simple facts and resolve to move on in your lives. Do not get stuck
at entry level. Consider these rules and GO ON TO HIGHER AND BETTER LEVELS than you have
been stuck on. Just like the satisfaction you have when in reaching the top level in a
video game, resolve to be tomorrow’s business managers, inventors, millionaires and
whatever you wish to be in your lives ahead. Use NOW wisely the tools available to you
because time marches on and waits for no one. There can be no return to the school years.
There can be only problems ahead if you get stuck and remain at entry level.
GOOD LUCK with your
efforts. Work with those who are here to help you to break the codes so that YOU CAN MOVE
UP TO OTHER LEVELS, THOSE THAT WILL MAKE REACHING YOUR DESIRED GOALS POSSIBLE.
Andrew Yiannides NDD.,
here to the page where we publish a letter pointing to scenarios organised by abusers
of public office as they arranged through 'a used selfish, and naive gestation
vessel'. The original scenario and consequential scripts and scenarios were criminally
intended and used for the imposition of 'pre-organised and arranged plans for the targeted
sperm provider in the instance at hand'. Of such realities many the victims of the
organised break-up of families and the destruction of same through abuse of the courts'
facilities as arranged by the organisers in the course of alleged legitimate court
proceedings. Every one of the victims of the divorce industry who had been afforded the
information and pointed to the fact that evidence to be used in order to expose the
organised crimes against humans by and through alleged servants of the public].
Master Alexandros Y
30 June 1996
My Ref. 3OJCOLAP
Your Ref. Your Birthday
Alexandros"?µ?????? ?????? ?????????? ?????" and modern man through
Sigmund Freud twisted it around to "We are all the products of our childhood".
You are sixteen to-day. I attach copy (reprint) of the letter which I had cause to write
to your school on 25th September 1992. As I promised (at the time of the events stated in
the letter) I now afford you the opportunity to know of who and what I am made of. HOW I
cared and feared for YOUR future. The ancient Greeks coined
As you read through the letter I did not wish for you to know the
content of, you will recollect that I also did not allow you to attend the meeting your
mother and I alone had with the deputy head of the school. You will recollect that the
teacher, Ms Dear (I loved HER choice of Ms by your teacher, not Miss nor Mrs either; it
exposed more than enough) was asked to leave the room by the Deputy Head; he had read my
letter just as the head who did not wish to speak with me on the day of the events. The
causes and the subject matter of the letter may or may not help you to understand ‘the
idiot’ but you can rest assured that what you experienced in life so far it is nothing.
Let those events and what I did and tried to do for you help you now; you only have to
make the wrong choice ones and you take the downward slide; often enough it is others who
make the wrong decisions which affect you and you must learn to distinguish between the
naive and the deliberate. I made my own choices in life and allowed and used what I regarded
and regard to be the right guiding lights; unlike others I took no liberties with the
rights of others. I acted honestly and honourably throughout; I have hurt no one and
helped many. I have no regrets.
You have had the opportunities so far to get to know of the
"bricks mortar and money revellers; those who have no respect for others, as Ritou
told me (and Christina too) on Holy Thursday 1993 before we went to Ayios Eleftherios that
evening. You know of and may one day realise what, how and who "did not care about
people" (her words at the time). In that tragic case it was people who did not care
before and AFTER her tragic statement to all; and all who ignored her before ignored her
statement too; AND they have carried on in much the same way SINCE.
When you hear and know of those who care not about people and their
activities before, after and since, you might perhaps elect and choose for yourself the
path you will follow. The choice is yours; let no other make it for you; let no one else
‘impose’ on you their ways. You will get to know of man’s and God’s Laws as you go
along life’s way. You have already seen and lived through the effects of lies,
dishonesty, theft and malice; worse the effects for GREED, through such activities. You
have seen how such activities affect others, the victims; you yourself have been the
victim of greed, envy, spite and lies by those who ‘befriended’ you. The letter
declaration from ‘my mother(?)’ which I gave to Artemis on father’s day may well
have opened your eyes to the ways of others; the dishonest, the liars and the hypocrites.
I used to speak to you of "????? µ?? ????
??????? ??? ?? ??? ?? ????? ?????"; the
equivalent in English is "Birds of a feather FLOCK together’; I say no more.
Use the truth and the facts, blame others not for your own wrong choices and decisions.
Mr H Freed, BA(Hons), MA, PGCE
My Ref. PRA11992
Your Ref. MF411
25th September 1992
Dear Mr Freed
I refer to my visit yesterday afternoon, as soon as our son Alexandros
came home from school with cuts and scratches on both sides of his neck and face which he
had sustained through an unprovoked attack on his person by a girl.
In accordance with your statements, to me, no investigation whatsoever
had taken place even though three hours had lapsed since that vicious attack on him. And
although a victim with injuries which were bleeding, your staff simply elected to treat
him as the aggressor holding him in punishment without any attendance to his injuries,
I was told by you that Alexandros had, in the course of this week, been
involved in two fights with one other boy and that the previous day outside school hours
he had ‘beaten’ up a younger boy. You then proceeded to ask me if Alexandros had told
me of these events. You also stated that the distressed condition I was in, and my anger,
were not conducive to having a ‘normal’ conversation, dismissing thereby the day’s
events, and the purpose of my visit, with other issues.
As I stated before leaving your office, since Alexandros came to
Leytonstone School my wife and I have worked with teachers in order that their ‘work’
might not be undermined in any way; school records, if properly kept, will bear me out on
this. I also pointed out that school staff may encourage and or approve of girls at the
school to be assertive and aggressive; my wife and I do not. Last year Alexandros barely
started his school year when one particular girl persistently insisted to be his girl
friend; she even went as far as to deploy another young girl in order to force herself on
Alexandros. Nobody cared and nobody spoke to the girls; when he reacted by throwing one
girl’s school satchel in the dustbin and pushed the other away/down he was branded as
aggressive because of his momentary and impulsive reactions which were brought about as a
result of the girls’ unattended to by school staff persistence. And when I related this
issue to you yesterday, you dismissed it as of no consequence!! ! To this day we do not
know how the two girl’s persistent and aggressive impositions on Alexandros were treated
by the school staff. You dismissed the start of school records on a young boy in such
circumstances as of no relevance and of no consequence! I ! I ! I begged to disagree
stating that on this occasion I will not let the issue in the hands of school staff,
especially since they elected to react by prejudging and ignoring the day’s event
through other issues.
Before leaving your office I asked of you to furnish me with the name
and the address of the girl who had ‘been involved in a fight’ with Alexandros; you
defaulted to comply, even though I stated that I wished to see her parents and for myself
to check if she had sustained any injuries and or visible signs in the course of ‘the
fight’. After leaving your office I proceeded to go with Alexandros to the home of a boy
who had earlier, in accordance with what Alexandros told me, been attacked and kicked in
the groin by the very same girl who attacked Alexandros. At that boy’s home and in the
presence of his mother and sister he related the girl’s aggressive weight and height
throwing and bullying antics; this spontaneous statement by the boy I recorded. Satisfied
that the attack on Alexandros was an unjustified and unprovoked attack I attended the
police where the matter was reported as a crime because Alexandros had sustained injuries
which all at school ignored deliberately, the reason of my anger and the issue which
caused me to come to the school and seek a meeting with you.
I took Alexandros to our doctor this morning where he was examined and
the injuries he sustained were duly recorded. He was also administered a Tetanus booster
injection by the doctor, which the doctor considered essential in view of the cuts and the
conditions under which he had sustained them; this the doctor did of his own and without
any questions and or prompting from me.
Because I had asked the other boy, yesterday, to enquire of other
pupils at school about that specific girl’s aggressive mentality I received a telephone
call this evening from the mother of a boy who had also been attacked and kicked/kneed in
the groin by the girl. The mother invited me to her home in order that we might meet and
discuss the matter. To begin with she informed me that she had in fact recently written to
the school and had received/letter in response from Ms V J Dear wherein she was promising
to look into the complaint made about the girl’s attitude and mentality. I invited the
boy (Delgardo) to relate to me what happened, and in the presence of his mother and father
he begun to tell me how he had witnessed what happened to my son. Alexandros apparently
asked the girl in question if she had really kicked Demetri in the groin (Demetri had just
related such an event to Alexandros) and her reaction was "Yeah. Do you want to know
what it feels like?", at the same time moving in to attack Alexandros, who turned his
back to avoid being kicked/kneed in the groin; the girl then grubbed him by the neck ,
kneed him in the backside instead and pulled him to the ground where she viciously tried
to strangle him. Alexandros, according to this corroborated evidence, suffered an
unprovoked attack from a vicious girl who enjoys kicking and kneeing boys in their private
parts; she, according to the information furnished to me by the three boys, is apparently
taller and heavier than anyone else in her year and has even been known to attack persons
in the fourth year because of her physique; this factor alone brings into question any
attempt, by anybody, to suggest that boys invite trouble by tackling with her.
Worse still was the revelation from Delgardo that he had told Ms Dear
what happened and how that girl attacked Alexandros (without due cause or justifiable
reason, except perhaps an inherent mental attitude towards boys) right after the attack on
Alexandros which should make it shortly after one o’clock. Ms Dear apparently then chose
to remain indifferent, unconcerned and impassive to Alexandros’ injuries for the rest of
the day, even defaulted to report to you what she had been told, (according to your
statement to me) and to all intents and purposes other issues were of relevance but not
the issue at hand (the event outside the room where Ms Dear had asked Alexandros to remain
Even worse, when I invited Alexandros to relate to me what happened
yesterday, over the entire day, he begun by telling me why he attended the head of year
teacher and how she enquired of him if he had been involved in an incident the previous
day outside school hours. He was invited by Ms Dear to write down , on a piece of paper
she handed him, the event which was of ‘immediate interest to her" over which she
had elected to take prompt and unilateral action. Alexandros’ statement in response was
handed to her about an hour or so later (playtime) and therein he related (according to
his statement to me , which was confirmed last night by others who had witnessed the
events of his written statement) the event, how it arose, how he was set up through lies
(which the boy he hit did not deny to begin with) and HOW AFTER HE BECAME AWARE that
others had set him up he knew he had made a mistake and that he had to apologise to the
boy he hit (in line with his home upbringing, hence my wife’s and my interest in
discipline at school as well, which you and your staff may well have misinterpreted). And
as you were made aware yesterday, I knew nothing of the incident which you and your staff
may well had viewed from the wrong angle; the fact remains that Alexandros not only
admitted he was wrong BUT HE, OF HIS OWN VOLITION, APOLOGISED TO THE BOY FIRST THING IN
THE MORNING on the way to school in the presence of witnesses. He has been brought up to
recognise his mistakes, to seek to correct them and above all to accept punishment when
that is called for; and that is why my wife and I have supported your staff without ever,
to this day, any attempt to undermine them.
However, yesterday’s events have shed new light on your staffs
approach and attitude. What we have on the one hand is pre judgement of an event on
preconceived ideas and subsequently complete and utter indifference to injuries sustained
through an unprovoked, unjustified and vicious attack by a girl who may well be twice the
weight of Alexandros and apparently revels in such attacks on boys. Accordingly my
decision to report the matter to the police, particularly since your staff remained~
indifferent to Alexandros’ injuries all day; and this attitude from a member of your
staff who had received letters about the aggressive nature of the girl and her mentality.
Having examined Alexandros’ diary and duly noted the absence of any
entries from school in respect of what I can now refer to as "alleged two fights with
the same boy this week", I hereby request for an explanation from your office. I also
request and demand for a copy of the written statement that Alexandros gave to Ms Dear
yesterday in respect of the event outside school hours the day before.
In the circumstances I would respectfully submit that a teacher’s
prime duty is to recognise the positive aspects of his/her pupils and cultivate them, not
wily nilly to hinge on negatives (which they should work with co-operating parents to
eradicate) and even whether justified or not (the latter being evident in this instance)
seek to create conditions that are only conducive to character destruction and
assassination through complex creating prejudices.
A copy of this letter will now be forwarded to the chair of Governors
and the Chief Education Officer. It is our wish that the issues raised herein are fully
and properly addressed. At the expense of repeating myself, yet again, the indifference
displayed by Ms Dear to Alexandros’ injuries (which I have arranged to have
photographed) was the main reason I came to see you yesterday. That issue alone exhibits
and displays an approach which is way out of order and unacceptable from a teacher; in
itself the matter should be referred to a child psychologist who should then report back
to that teacher what she was actually achieving and or creating; furthermore the same
psychologist should be afforded a copy of Alexandros’ statement as to the incident of
the previous day so that he may form an informed opinion of the boy’s upbringing and
true character, which through her failings (whether she recognises it or not) may well
affect him and has given us the right to question her intentions.
Finally Mr Freed, what do you expect of children who are brushed aside
when they complain to teachers about the behaviour of other children and the teachers do
nothing ? Do you expect the children to remain passive victims? The issues must be
properly addressed by ALL, parents, teachers and the Education Authority. I for my part
will do what must be done to work with others. And to begin with it will be with the
parents of the other victims of the weight and height pushing girl aggressor at the centre
of the spade of events which appear not to have been addressed by the school despite
letters from parents. When we placed our son in a co-educational school we wished for him
to learn of co-existence with the opposite sex; we did not know of and or expect the
school to be actively breeding nymphets and or amazons, Mr Freed.
Mr. A Yiannides NDD., ACFI.
65 Abbott’s Park Road
Leyton London EI0 6HU
In October 2010, the coalition's Attorney General, in an interview
published by 'COUNSEL' specifically spoke of the police distancing themselves
from cases of (small-fry) fraud and asserted that he was
making that element his department's priority. IT REMAINS TO BE SEEN, WHAT the
coalition of the Con-LibDems, THE GOVERNMENT OF THE DAY, WILL IN FACT ATTEND TO THE
RAMPANT FRAUD. IF IT WILL DEAL APPROPRIATELY with the criminals who abuse public office,
especially when faced with appropriate submissions and claims that will be
delivered in due course. Visitors/readers are urged to read the article published
in the London Evening Standard, as settled by the Rt. Hon. David Blunkett, Home Secretary
in 2003 [*Link from here to the article we reproduce in another webpage
and consider "Why tolerate the
arrogance of the legal circles who had and have the audacity to assert to the lawmakers
that the lawmakers have nothing to do with the law"]. While there, above it, the explicit letter to
ex-Minister, the Rt. Hon. Frank Field MP, delivered a few days earlier. ALL alleged
victim-challengers who contacted Andrew Yiannides, by the time the letter was sent to the
Minister, received copy of the letter just as they received copies of other letters
submitted to government maintained Ministers and other official appointees to public
office. Accessing the material pointed to from the letter (URLs) is of utmost importance.
It should assist 'recognition of the citizen's rights at work', when called upon properly
in truly democratic states. The above in 2003; there were other 'submissions' and among
such civilised and, within the law, approaches by citizens that led to the right actions
by governments, the explicit challenges when we set about exposing one of the most evil of
alleged victims of the legal circles to have ever contacted us [*Link to our explicit submissions to (a) the Prime
Minister, (b) the Chancellor / Treasury, (c) the Home Secretary. WE acted so after we had
secured more than enough evidence about the parts of an alleged victim whose only
interests were (i) the rewards under the table FOR KEEPING QUIET about the ORGANISED FRAUD
THROUGH ABUSE OF THE COURTS' FACILITIES and (ii) her parts in blunt attempts that were
intended to discredit the person she was sent along to mess about with, Mr Andrew
Yiannides]. Access please the
letter to the Home Secretary, the Rt. Hon. Jack Straw, in December 1998 [*Link*
[*L] from here to the letter] and note the results
evinced in the newspaper article (Hornsey Journal) also within days of the letter reaching
its destination. Many the charlatans and stooges -lovers and 'promoters of the system as is'- on the
job for decades; one and all acting as sold souls always do [*Link [*L] from here to the evidence we
point to relative to the parts of one of a number of sold to the system fraudsters who
were sent along / introduced to Andrew Yiannides by the managers / organisers of the LIPS
crowd / mob].
The letter to 'The Times' (above) clarified and qualified the
father's concerns after the arrogant interference in the family's peace of mind and
well-being. Only idiots and non-thinkers can fail to catch on to the simple fact that the
father's concerns were founded and rested on inexcusable and unjustified 'teachings' by
some idiot who was acting on and following policies hatched up by others as directed by
'politically correct' morons who were / are acting on created states and situations as
arranged by the directors of most, if not all, of mankind's tribulations for centuries,
millennia. Realities such as the scenario covered in the letter to 'The Times', and the
reckless failure by the puppet dangling on the strings of the media Barons lead to the
state of ill-informed and conditioned serfs and slaves. Serfs enslaved to the rubbish
promoted by the media Barons, as planned and hatched up by the creators of most, if not
all, of mankind's tribulations for centuries / millennia. Refer to the words of an ex
Chief of Staff with 'The New York Times', John Swainton, linked to from here, and recognise why he spoke as he did only when he
was moving out of the firing line - retiring. The realities pointed to from here
should be of interest to 'humans', to persons who use information imparted & received
in the only way that 'alive grey-matter users, persons who are gifted with an alive mind
should and must. Many the allegedly concerned victim-challengers who failed to act as
expected of them.
researchers and victim / visitors should link from here
to the extracts we copied, in our quotes page, from the work of Frank Schaeffer 'Dancing
Alone'; therein, among other issues the author refers to the Social Workers,
in the USA operating as 'the only glaziers in town, going around smashing windows'.
The mother of the children, in the instance at hand, was fully aware of the fact that in
1974-1975 in letters to the Social Services maintained by the London Borough of Islington
(North Central London) the father of her lifeless properties had written in very similar
terms to the head of the Department at the LBI, when writing in respect of his best
friend's children and how those lifeless 'properties were being used by the mother who
brought them into the world. It suffices to point out that in that instance the mother was
guided and assisted by the Social Workers who were operating out of the London Borough of
Islington; always in accordance with the plans of the craft-y ones who set out to take
control of all and everything by organising the lives of 'the serfs', the sons of men on
planet earth. *Link from here to a reference from the
disputed plans for mankind attributed to, but disputed as genuine, by 'The Elders of Zion'.
researchers and the genuinely concerned victims of abused public services can and should *link
from here to the page where we point to and expose through
evidence (which no one can ever brush aside) the common roots & connection between the
organisers, the creators and the promoters of false representations to the sons of men on
planet earth. WE point to organised fraudsters who have been imposing (through
participation in the most vile & evil in concept) LONG ONGOING CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUD ON
MANKIND. The fraud we refer to has been ongoing for well over 2300 years, under
various forms and guises but always resting and founded on the original and grossly
misrepresented creation of and by criminals who set out to take control of all and
everything through fraud and deceptions aplenty.