h-rtitle.gif (7604 bytes)

Crime - Organised - Institutionalised - Corruption - Fraud - Protection Rackets, run and managed by judicial chair occupants, in a free-for-all state of abundance. Note below the arrangements between the administrative, the judiciary and the media; read of the all-embracing guarantee in place, in contempt of all law : the root shall be pointed to.

WHERE IS JUSTICE? Read below:-

"The court has inherent jurisdiction to stay an action which must fail; as, for instance an action brought in respect of an act of State"

*Link from here to founder's tribulations in 1972-75 and marvel at the creativity of allegedly honourable officers of Justice and the Law in the mother of all PSEUDOdemocracies

  • And by extension any act of any public servant who is appointed, retained and maintained by other public servants for all of whom, the state, as employer, is ultimately responsible, including abusers of judicial chair occupancy. Hence, the billions paid out as covered in the affidavit which visitors can link to directly from here [*Link].
  • Link also from here to the founder's conclusions as of 1972-75 when the great Metropolitan police were seen to be nothing but accessories to and abettors of the rampant fraud and corruption through the courts organised and processed to fruition while Members of Parliament were -as they still do- promoting the waffle that amounts to nothing short of:-

'independence of the judiciary to act in contempt of ALL LAW (national and international) in a pseudo-democracy.

*Link from here to proof of the parts the police play in promotion and expansion of the criminal activities instigated, processed and imposed on society by the legal circles. Read of assertions by a typical hypocrite, none other than the Commissioner of the Metropolitan Police, Sir Robert Mark QPM, when he spoke of FALSE RECORDS / FORGERIES by the legal circles while delivering his famous Dimbleby Lecture on BBC-TV in November 1973, 15 months after he received true copy of THE FORGERY advanced and promoted by the licensed criminals : solicitors and barristers for their evil ends in the case that opened Andrew Yiannides' mental eyes to the realities of life in the United Kingdom, a typical PSEUDOdemocracy. Can anyone enlighten Andrew and the millions of victims of the legal circles WHY NO PROSECUTION of the solicitors & the barristers in 1972 or thereafter?.

  • With such a facility in place (the words we point to above) and arrogant abuse of public office, can anyone assert, or argue, that Mr Andrew Yiannides, the founder of human-rights, was not right to determine that Justice has been abducted and that she is held captive in the dungeons maintained by her abductors who rape her daily in their courts? (>Hence the c reation of www.jusaticeraped.org <)
  • ALL Member States of the European Union are subject to the ruling which visitors, readers and researchers can access in the explicit page /yourrights.htm

*Link from here to the realities - in due course also a link to the warning (indirect but nonetheless very clear) for thinkers to recognise 

  • On 3rd March 2008 >someone's birthday< we released a House of Lords PRECEDENT CASE and reveal deliberations by their Lordships in respect of FRAUD - DECEPTION - CONSPIRACY & IMPLIED LIES BY KEEPING SILENT about any wrong imposed on any other.
  • >>> IN THE MEANTIME we have been naming and shaming a number who know of and engage in much more than just approve wrongs imposed on Mr & Mrs Average, the millions of taxpayers, in our allegedly civilised country / state / province / district of the European Union created by politicians, without reference to the taxed for fraud sucker-serfs, allegedly for the benefit of the citizens from FRAUD & CORRUPTION, among other promotions.

Needless to say the case entailed activities and practices by solicitors as Mr Andrew Yiannides was subjected to, decades later, by an old school friend, Mr Kypros Nichola of Nicholas & Co. in London. Mr K. Nichola bluntly abused the trust placed in him and indulged, in tandem with others, in criminal activities intended to cause the damages that were imposed on the targeted 'serf' by accredited - by the Law Society & Bar Council - allegedly Honourable Officers of the Supreme Court, the courts maintained by successive elected governments in the United Kingdom, one of many pseudodemocracies. In due course another revelation relevant to the arrogant 'inherent jurisdiction', through which to deny, obstruct justice & impose all manner of criminally created states on 'the serfs', who are taxed for the cost of maintaining criminals in public office, in pseudo-democracies.

RESPONSIBLE FOR THE STATE OF AFFAIRS, successive irresponsible Lord Chancellors and Home Secretaries who ignored and ignore all complaints and submissions by victims of the organised crimes we point to and expose in our pages, irrespective of the evidence and the law pointed to, by the victims of it all, the citizens who are called upon to pay taxes for the maintenance of criminals in public office.

[*Link from here to our exclusive page, covering confidential fraud as arranged THROUGH THE BEST KEPT OPEN SECRET in alleged democracies, European States. Elsewhere the foundations and corner stone upon which the operatives built the societies of their making using the bricks and mortar we cover in this and other pages. The visitor should not be under any illusion that the stars in the theatrical productions, covered in our pages were by any stretch of the imagination 'humans' who were / are gifted with any attributes that distinguish 'true humans' (>thinkers<) from animals.

Fraud in court  Council staff use Forgeries   Misconduct in Public Office. 2 cases relative to applicable law One Protocol says it ALL It betrays arrogant intentions Law Provides for THEFTS and it covers Judges too Judges' duties   TIME 4 CHANGE   & CHALLENGES Site CONTENTS - Table of Contents & ongoing work Your Rights & OBLIGATIONS to Society SITE SEARCH facility for any specific element / issue of concern to visitors / readers
COURTS : their Facilities Abused For ORGANISED CRIME : FRAUD Solicitor's Perjury & Victim Ignores it all Just like the Law Society always does Blackmailed or is it Just Conditioned & Subjugated Victims who join the club ? We name Lovers of blunt fraud through courts - Users of the facilities 4 illicit gains Local Authorities & FRAUD on 'serfs' the Taxpayers who are kept in the dark Police Party to & Endorsing Criminal Acts, Activities Arrogant Fraud FALSE Records & Contempt of Law by the legal Circles & Public Services The crafty ones & Vexatious Litigant PLOYS for the rewarded silent

* Information FOR victims who wish to co-operate by EXPOSING & CHALLENGING abusers of Public Office *

family.uk-human-rights justiceraped.org dssfraud.htm confraud.htm dadscare.htm contract.htm converts.htm MensAid
solicitorsfromhell.co.uk chancellor.htm theyknow.htm solfraud.htm sheknows.htm 4deceit.htm convicti.htm forward.htm

December 2006 - SUMMONS ISSUED & SERVED IN RESPECT OF FRAUDULENT & RECKLESSLY IRRESPONSIBLE ACTIVITIES & IMPOSITIONS THROUGH THE FAMILY COURTS

*Link from here to evidence. *Link also from here to a case when the abusers of the courts' facilities abandoned their plans for another targeted family

IMPORTANT INFORMATION for all victims of malpractice - misconduct - negligence, etc. TO NOTE

In the civil justice system in England and Wales, a judge presides over the proceedings that are argued by the opposing sides through the adversarial process. The process enables the court, judge, to reach a conclusion as to the truth of the facts in dispute. Thereat it is for the judge to apply the law to the facts proven, established at court.

The system as evolved is covered in the page 'English Legal System' and remains the same after the Woolf reforms.

An explicit Affidavit [*L] plus exhibits and
     letters to a Chief Inspector of Police
[*L],
          one to solicitors
[*L] and another to the Lord Chancellor [*L] evince
               ORGANISED CRIMES
(Access and read the letter to the police in September 2006 [*L])

Access & read from one of a number of letters to the Prime Minister : * I believe that New Labour will deliver us from the wrongs we have been suffering for far too long. Use of our resources in terms of human potential and capabilities can and should be channelled through rights not wrongs, through positives not through negatives. It is our produce and ingenuity we can sell to others not the minefields of corrupt and bankrupt public services. * [*Link from here to the page, note the steps taken to ensure the Prime Minister forwarded / delegated submissions and evidence received at 10 Downing Street to the right Minister / Ministry because the submissions were in respect of ORGANISED CRIMES

3rd March 2011 added link [*L] to the BBC-TV Dimbleby Lecture in 1973 as the Metropolitan Police Commissioner, Sir Robert Mark prepared & presented to the sucker-serfs

...

dadscare.htm            KEY Page Changes 26 Oct. 2006

Dads Care - Proof  *Page created December 1998 & Released late November 2005*
Page is DEDICATED also import.gif (1348 bytes)
HELP US TO HELP YOU PLEASE (*Link to plea).hrbnrsml.gif 
		(1162 bytes) JOIN
OTHERS FOR COMMON ACTIONS BORN AND RESTING ON COMMON CAUSES.

DIVORCE INDUSTRY VICTIMS can JOIN and CONTRIBUTE THEIR INPUT at:
JUSTICE RAPED

(Coax the International Community - the JURY to  JUDGE the JUDGES *)

THE SERIOUS CAN APPLY TO JOIN  URrights@yahoogroups

NEWS & New Material

JOIN Others On Line and publish your Statement of Facts with the Evidence you have. (Community on Line member's case at the European Court on Human Rights - paves the way TO PLEAD VIOLATIONS caused through abusive use of the courts in allegedly civilised Democratic States) Use your rights in law (link) and ACT, with others, against the offenders. Chip in for the creation of the mass of evidence against abusers of public office : the abductors and rapists of Justice. You can then benefit from THE EVIDENCE, the DATA you will help establish. It can all be used in any action, severally or jointly with others, as the case may be . Crimes against humanity are not ruled out when a large number of citizens can come up with evidence and as victims concur and or expand upon on the FACTS STATED & The VIOLATIONS PLEADED as LODGED at the ECoHR, already.

<>

Andrew apologises to friends who joined him for the common cause at URrights.ning.com as concerned victims, for the developments after www.ning.com introduced NEW terms for the provision of the facility. Andrew was informed that the existing material on line could be downloaded BUT the facility WAS OBSTRUCTED by the very people ning.com NOTE PLEASE that URrights as a domain had evidently been  registered by 'unknown' as a DOT COM domain LET common sense determine as to who & above all WHY?

 

Key - PAGE ELEMENTS
INTRODUCTION to page
DUTY to REPORT CRIME
INVITATION to victim dads
FAX - challenging the C.S.A
Of SIMILAR DISPOSITION 
Contempt to EVIDENCE 
Contempt to LAW 
FORGERIES USED
Need to APPEAL - FRAUD
OBSTRUCTING Examination
Processes Posted LATE
Principles of Citizens RIGHTS

PAGE CHANGES - List
Links & Bookmarks to page
New Layout & Add Material

Cases/Sites by Element
Contempt to Evidence
Haringey Police - H/B Fraud
V. B. Foden - Mortgage
V. B. Foden - Divorce
V. B. Foden-Solicitor Case
Contempt to Law
Enfield Council - C. Court
Hackney Council - C. Court
Haringey Council - C. Court
Haringey Police - H/B Fraud
Len Miskulin - Divorce
V. B. Foden - Mortgage
False Instruments
Len Miskulin - Divorce
P. Constantinou - Divorce
Forgery Used
V. B. Foden - Financial
Haringey Council-H/B Fraud
PERJURY - Used
V. B. Foden-Solicitor Case
Obstruct - Examination
P. Constantinou - Divorce
Obstructing Justice
Crown Prosecution Service
Court of Appeal - R.B.Del C
part 3     
Strike Out
Helen Patey - Assertions
Divorce Frauds Challenged
V. B. Foden - Plymouth
<>.     

A Barrister's tribulations with the Law Society & the courts prompted him to write a book which he then shoved in the family closet. (*Link to the explicit page where we expose the realities suppressed by the victim and his chums. READ of their evil in essence activities).

A letter to 'The Times'

ltt96asr.jpg (60198 bytes)
*Link from here to the content of the letter on the right in HTML text.

The editor's response

tnpja96r.jpg (21973 bytes)
Mr & Mrs Average -all parents- should consider the realities & conclude accordingly, and IF the revelations we point to in our page on the MEDIA any decent parent and   tax contributor could possibly ignore such arrangements by the fraudsters in control of a PSEUDOdemocracy.
The email below should clarify the all important element of connecting & co-operating for common causes as the content of the email discloses.
duncanr.jpg (84274 bytes)
An explicit web-page was created based on 'The Sun'* article as commanded of any 'true human and thinker' who bothers to 'consider such realities as the email relates to. [*Link]

 

 

 

 

 

 

undercon.gif (286 bytes) Page last updated: June 20, 2012   *  *
Site reconstruction for better navigation

VISITORS ARE URGED to access and READ THE IMPORTANT update and ADDENDA we were obliged to introduce in January 2002. We had no choice but to REPORT THE CRIMES TO THE TREASURY. Our observations and knowledge of the constructive frauds made us accessories if we kept quiet, like the alleged victims who work towards the implementation of the schemes by the abductors and rapists of Justice, the Goddess. You will find the addenda statement at the top of the Updated Pages File. We are sure that you will share with us our concerns and most profound disappointment at and with persons who adopt and promote activities which they know are nothing but downright crimes. We refer to our exclusive page where we expose (as conscientious law abiding citizens) the Confidentiality Between Fraudsters that exists care of the BEST OPEN SECRET. Visitors, readers and researchers are urged to access the additional material and evidence that proves ORGANISED FRAUD BY PERSONS IN AUTHORITY. (*Direct link from here to the proof).

Guidelines for Navigating through the extensive material: access instructions.  The first step for visitors to acquaint  themselves with the extensive material should be to use the SEARCH FOR facility. Just type in any word or combination of words / issues that are of concern / interest - need information and our views about. Remember that our views rest on factual experiences and research with evidence in support. We urge visitors and in particular victims of the legal circles and the Law Enforcement Agencies to access the introduction page to the Community on Line concept and facilities should use [*Link].

For further clarification / information email: webmaster@

EXTRACT FROM A LETTER (Dad to daughter)

Read here of fatherly concerns and below of advice to pupils of a Secondary Modern Comprehensive in the London Borough of Islington.

The extract:-

'It is easy, for you to forget that mother had been at home, unlike ALL the other ‘females’ within your known family circles. She was looking after your brother and you, because I WANTED for you to benefit from that which I NEVER HAD. I also gave you the best I could afford on top of all the love I never had. It was dad who kept it all together, on his own, through hard work. I would even work evenings and weekends when the occasion arose in order to improve the life of all and to buy a house and do my best to ‘turn it into a real home for all’. Mum had other ideas and documents establish the facts. It was dad who bought each of his children a computer each and it was dad who spent time with both of them, after work and weekends, for a while, in order to teach them how to use their computers. Mum who was at home with you all day never bothered, however. Do you remember ‘The Naughty Boy" changed to "The Naughty Girl" in a few seconds? I do!

My dearest Artemis, it was not dad who walked out on you, it was mother with and because of others who ‘guided and USED her all the way’ as will be revealed. Others interfered because of their own self-interests. They interfered first in my career and in OUR home and what was a family, properly constituted and maintained by dad. It was mum with assistance from others who walked out taking her lifeless (as she treated HER children) possessions with her. Easy to forget that mum would drag you and your brother out of any other room I entered too, whenever I entered her kingdom and paradise.

Easy to overlook the fact that mum used your brother and you because in accordance with Western Civilised Culture (which she experienced in the mid 1970’s, in the break up of one of my best friend's home and family) children are nothing but a woman’s personal lifeless jewels, the Social Workers so determine (*F2). You should read Frank Schaeffer’s book "Dancing Alone" and you will then understand why he refers to them as "The only glaziers in town going around smashing windows". To that I add "For the benefit of the organisers of it all, the criminals in the legal circles".

Easy to forget that, I even had to call at your school in order to leave with the office staff a birthday card to be passed on to you, by the staff. I had no choice because mother, and you, arranged for me not to know of your whereabouts. On the occasion I was told that mum, allegedly, had a court order for me not to get anywhere near her possessions. I did ask you to borrow and read Terence Frimsby’s book "Outrageous Fortune"; it is obvious that you did not bother. There exist letters my dearest daughter about the assertions from the teachers and the school office staff. They mocked and laughed at me. Whosoever advised mum to indulge in such scenarios, naively and foolishly believed that I would be ‘stupid enough to waste my years in the legal system like Terence Frimsby. They expected of me to give the criminals in the legal system chances to DEFRAUD both your mother, with your brother and you suffering much more pain than you have had to endure what was IMPOSED ON US ALL by others who were using mother.'

The above is dedicated to the following dens of criminals:

  1. The Law Society
  2. The London Borough of Waltham Forest & its Social Services Department
  3. The Family Services Unit supported & recommended by the above - L.B.W.F
  4. The circles who finance the above Unit other than the budget rapists of the L.B.W.F
  5. The police as maintained and propped up by the L.B.W.F
  6. The Mediation Service
  7. The staff and officers at Bow County Court
  8. The Lord Chancellor's Department that maintains criminals as alleged Public Servants
  9. The Police Complaints Authority fraudsters who promote waffle & fail to look into serious matters reported to them.
  10. The Treasury that meets the salaries of criminals who indulge as covered in an exclusive page [*Linked to from here]

Read below of SPECIFIC RIGHTS FOR THE CITIZENS & OBLIGATIONS FOR THE STATES that signed up to the European Convention on Human Rights, as the atrocities of the Second World War came to an end and the causes of the European tragedy were taken to task.

*

ARTICLE 2 of the FIRST PROTOCOL TO THE CONVENTION specifically provides: "No person shall be denied the right to education. In the exercise of any functions which it assumes in relation to education and to teachings, the State shall respect the right of the parents to ensure such education and teaching in conformity with their own religious and philosophical convictions".

The above provisions relate and point to the fact that the most offensive and horrendous of atrocities that were at the epicentre of the most destructive of human interactions and relations, in recent history, 'The Holocaust', mankind has been hearing of and reading about, for some 70 years. No decent 'human' could ever be asked to ignore or overlook such well documented activities which the founder of human-rights has been referring to as the folly of follies and the most blunt of 'man's inhumanity to man' crimes. Many the hypocrites who excel in pointing to the very crimes, ever since, while in arranged ignorance of past atrocities and crimes on a much bigger scale. The element that we point to here, however, happens to be the fact that the Jews, as a people, were targeted because of their Religious Beliefs and orientation, hence the above provision, when drafting the European Convention for Human Rights, in 1948 and at the same time, on parallel lines The Universal Declaration by the United Nations.

1

We request of and URGE OUR VISITORS / READERS to consider the very elements related in the father's letter to his daughter [above] and WE BEG ONE AND ALL CONCERNED PARENTS to read the letter from Mr Kadleigh of Bristol to the editor of 'The Times'. The editor did oblige the readers of 'The Times', by printing Mr Kadleigh's letter, pointing to 'the craft-y hypocrite', who decided to let the readers of the newspaper read of the PRINCIPLES the Hellenes were rearing / raising their children by adhering to such principles; principles which the very craft-y who have been organising all PSEUDOdemocracies -for centuries- set out to bury well over a millennium and a half ago, as any well informed 'researcher and student of past history', could not possibly ignore or overlook, provided, naturally, the information was / is at hand. All visitors access from here the quote from Isocrates' 'Aeropagiticos' in our quotes page.

2

Reference in Mr Kadleigh's letter to 'the birth of our civilisation', when in fact the author of the letter and the hypocrite who published Mr Kadleigh's letter, should and ought to have been aware of the fact that the Hellenes and their civilisation had been targeted for burial and elimination, care of ploys and the machinations of 'the craft-y who created the alleged creator of all and everything through their vile scenarios and scripts, which the fraudsters attributed to the alleged one and only who needed assistance from others IN ORDER TO PUT AN END to that which the sons of men had been achieving, as related in the most clear of the examples copied from their vile creation in one of our pages, linked to from here; there the TRUE LIFE SCENARIOS we cover in the page, cross-relate and match to a 't' the Old Testament vile scenario, simply because the participants in, the creators of the scripts and the directors of 'the theatrical shows in the courts', in our days, are followers of the teachings by examples stated in the Old Testament.

3

Reference to the father's letter, to the very editor in January 1996, linked to from here, should clarify a thing or two and raise the question: "Why suppress the concerned father's input for the average reader of 'The Times'?" Most must have been and be of above average aptitude and ethical approach to the rest of society in states / societies where the craft-y and the wily with malice aforethought suppress the truth of anything that could be beneficial and high on the agenda of alleged beacons and of considerable influence in shaping the society the craft-y recklessly and with fraudulent intentions have wilfully been pushing down and deeper into the dark caves of chaos where the followers and promoters of the teachings, by examples stated in the vile Old Testament- congregate.

4

References in the father's letter to the realities in our days, when approaching the dawn of the 21st century and who; also from which quarters the arrangements for 'the sons of men' to be the targeted non-entities who should be subjected to such tribulations as the young teenager and many other boys were subjected to care of such maligned and evil persons as the Headteacher, one Mr Freed, and a feminasty, one Ms Darling blatantly discriminated against the boys and encouraged the 'young amazon' through contempt of the law and blunt defaults in the exercise of their alleged public duties, when endorsing and promoting 'the politically correct discrimination' the father covered in the letter published below. Readers are directed from here to the letter the father wrote to his son, on his 16th birthday and kept his promise that the content of the letter to the Headteacher would not be released / made known to the son before then. It is for the average reader to recognise why the father did not wish for the young victim of blunt and arrogant discrimination on gender grounds NOT TO BE INFLUENCED IN A NEGATIVE WAY >encourage the boy to adopt the wrong attitude towards his teachers.  

ARTICLE 14 of THE CONVENTION specifically provides: "The enjoyment of the rights and freedoms set fourth in this convention shall be secured without discrimination on any grounds such as sex, race, colour, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, association with a national minority, property, birth or other status".

The above cross relate to the atrocities and the crimes committed against the Jews by the Nazi war-mongers. The most essential of provisions that emerges here, however, is the simple factor that there shall not be 'any' positive discrimination (pre planned or organised as was with the case for 'The Jewish Holocaust', crimes). The extent and comprehensiveness of this Article was one of the gems that attracted the attention of young Andrew when he first read the European Convention while a student at 'The English School', Nicosia, Cyprus.

1

Readers / visitors are requested to access the father's letter to Mr H. Freed, the Headteacher at Leytonstone School, 1992. Leytostone School, just another establishment churning out products of the New World Order of the days as arranged by the London Borough of Waltham Forest, a typical PSEUDOdemocratic set-up; another beehive churning out nymphets, amazons and encouraged >through teachings and convenient failures to correct wrongs, such as the unacceptable activities 'girls were / are encouraged to engage and indulge in such, as the young Alexandros Kimon was subjected to, for far too long<. Subjected to 'arranged by example teachings', young Alexandros Kimon was, that is, until the explicit letter was delivered by the father who did not approve of such regimes as the Politcally Correct blind were / have been imposing on societies in all PSEUDOdemocracies.

2

Pointed to the arrogant Mr H. Freed, to 'the well-qualified' New World Order farm animals creator, the realities at Leyton School churning out NOT HUMANS, not thinkers. Everything care of the regime the Politically Correct have been imposing on the targeted victims of such states as the 'Politically Correct generate and 'create conditioned sheeple', the new generations of 'conditioned sheeple' and programmed robots; 'the conditioned farm animals', most definitely NOT HUMANS. Most typical the examples covered by the states young Alexandros Kimon was being subjected to at Leytonstone School, care of the encouraged nymphet and the young amazon at the epicentre of the realities the father HAD NO CHOICE BUT TO ADDRESS through his explicit letter to the arrogant Mr. H Freed, the Headteacher.

3

In the explicit letter to Mr H Freed, clearly stated the realities the teenager Alexandros Kimon was subjected to; clearly stated also, the recognition of the fact that Mr H Freed and all under him, most definitely, were creating and using 'feminasties for the new World Order States', as organised and arranged by the followers and the promoters of the Old Testament teachings, by the creators of all allegedly civilised states, all PSEUDOdemocracies. Many the victims of organised and premeditated (care of such school regimes as Mr H Freed was presiding over) arrangements / regimes for the targeted 'sons of men'. Overseeing it all, well-qualified products of the New World Order, such as the shyster who failed, elected not to attend personally the scheduled meeting with the parents of the victim of the policies the school was serving for the Politically Correct Hypocrites operating out of and on directives from the London Waltham Forest. No 'human', NO GREY MATTER USER >THINKER< could possibly fail to recognise that the shyster elected not to attend the scheduled meeting after reading the letter which the concerned father settled and delivered to the office at Leytonstone School, in the afternoon of the previous day. The objective of the concerned father, was for Mr H Freed to read and take on board the loud messages before attending the scheduled meeting with the father who used his rights to put on record the realities born of and attached to the regime ongoing at Leytonstone School.

4

Creating the divorce industry products from children through teenagers to 'immature stooges -non thinkers- of both sexes' was the most crucial of thoughts in the father's mind. The father did encounter many 'typical stooges and sucker-serfs', over the years he spent in researching and studying / observing the many stooges who were sent along, or of their own contacted him, in order to abuse the trust one and all benefited from, when acting as self-centred dreamers who were chasing simply the cash under the table we point to in our pages. We cover more than enough about such dreamers, some of whom were noted to be acting and operating as hooked to the bait 'of the cash under the table' specifically covered the exclusive page and supplemented in a number of other pages. We point also to the fact that one such person (others too) even came along after accepting the TERMS FOR THE REWARDS TO VICTIMS OF THE LEGAL CIRCLES, as his solicitors wrote to another solicitor; and the author of the said letter we point to from here, did, earlier, engage in the rampant Housing Benefit Fraud we cover and expose in our pages also. Needless to say the targeted victims of the organised fraud were rendered helpless care of alleged servants of the public who engaged in the promotion and maintenance of the criminal activities through breaches of public duty and contempt for the law as covered in the explicit affidavits published in our pages, such as the page linked to from here.

The news item below with compliments to Mr Len Miskulin who elected (?) to ignore the challenges lodged at court as settled by Andrew Yiannides, for Mr. Miskulin. He departed to Croatia, however, never to contact Andrew again while maintaining contact with many others as a typical abuser of trust whose aims were to serve the plans of others, not what he agreed with Andrew Yiannides to work for. Through such convenient defaults, the abused court facilities and the powers that be flourish, as transpired in the course of the gathering at Mr Miskulin's residence when another venue / event was on the cards than the one Mr Yiannides was invited to attend for.

*Link from here to the page where we cover the aforesaid events and thereby qualify the aforesaid conclusion 'Another Venue Was On The Cards', as subsequent activities and the convenient defaults by Shaun O'Connor, who volunteered to keep the minutes established'
*Link also from here to the page where we published the explicit challenges to the abusers of the courts facilities in the matter of the used 'gestation vessel' for the impositions on targeted Len Miskulin, whose rights to know if he actually did father the two children the abusers of the 'family courts facilities had embarked upon' in contempt of the law and in particular the 'assured equality of the genders'.

csan05r.jpg (92322 bytes)
The above headline, on 28th November 2005, is the tip of the iceberg.  

Such records simply establish the arrogant positive discrimination & the invisible services, the reckless discrimination against 'targeted sucker-serfs'. We hasten to point to the case of Mr. Len Miskulin who sought DNA tests but was messed about by abusers of public office, judicial chair occupants. The explicit pleadings that were settled by Andrew Yiannides as lodged at court by him -soon after he contacted us- were addressing the blunt positive discrimination that is manifest through the courts. Sadly we have to point out that the victim had other plans than the objectives he promoted to us. Readers must access the page where we state realities no one can overlook / ignore and wake up.

  *

The image below to all victims of the organised break-up of families care of the abused Social Services and the multitude of ancillary facilities promoted by abusers of trust and public office, as 'social  services to the public' in all allegedly civilised 'modern.... PSEUDOdemocracies'.

*

Andrew Yiannides got to know of the arrangements, in place, -for 'mankind'- in the early and mid 1970s. Abusers of 'the created amenities were noted to be most proactive in the break-up of a targeted family, the family of one of his closest friends in London; the family was benefiting from 'the convenient facilities' offered to 'the gestation vessel' Andrew's friend had been married to, long enough to create five new lives', five new sucker-serfs.

*

Countless the victims. Of such background and a beneficiary, one Len Miskulin; Mr Miskulin* was introduced to Andrew Yiannides by Mr Dave Ellison, after one Duncan* 'discovered' the material facts and >realities< published by Andrew in the public domain, at the human-rights.demon.co.uk web-site.

*Link from here to explicit material >revelations<, attached to the victim, Len Miskulin's experiences
*Link also from here to another 'male' victim of the family break-up industry, >to another discarded sperm-provider / dildo< and read what that victim discovered as a long suffering 'OBSTRUCTED FATHER, a discarded dildo and WAKE UP SERFS.
*Link from here to the email from Duncan -in the left margin panel- received by Andrew

* The 'discovery', after Duncan benefited from articles & submissions by Andrew, a contributor, to a number of newsgroups; the submissions and the web-site material warranted and called-for because of the absolute need to expose and challenge abusers of public office and trust.
*Link from here to the background, as to 'WHY THE NEED to create permanent material in the public domain, on the Internet'? The absolute need arose after the creator of the website, Andrew Yiannides, recognised the validity of 'the disputed protocols'. The criminal activities ongoing at and within the Royal Courts of Justice -between 1972-1979- established beyond any doubt the fallacy of the fraudulently misrepresented ''judges' independent of any other influences, in the mother of modern Democracies >the UK PSEUDOdemocracy<. Most definitely the judiciary / judges within the Royal Courts of Justice (RCJ) were following the teachings by examples stated in the most vile of works ever to have been misrepresented to mankind, 'The Old Testament'. The creator of the website material did discard 'The Old Testament scripts and scenarios' as vile and evil before his teen years, before reaching his 11th birthday. The absolute need to challenge and expose abusers of trust and public office arose, specifically after considering the simple fact that the legal circles, allegedly Honourable officers of the Supreme Court, were impostors who systematically 'imposed on the targeted suckers-serfs', the long existing plans of the successors and followers of the teachings by examples stated in the Old Testament and more specifically AS ARRANGED / ORGANISED by the creators and followers of the plans on record as ''The Protocols'. Andrew naively accepted 'the protocols' to be false as the fraudsters who have been suppressing many truths have been asserting ever since Sergei Nilus published, in Russia at the turn of the 20th century, 'the very Protocols' which Andrew elected to refer as 'the plans of the wily and craft-y'.
*Link from here to the explicit words from 'the disputed Protocols', and note what the creators of the disputed documents, put on record and Nilus Sergei, on discovering 'the plans of the wily and craft-y', made public by publishing the offensive ideas from criminal minds, whether accepted as plans to be implemented or as the plans of dreamers. WHEN ONE PARALLELS REALITIES to the plans depicted in 'the Protocols' one has no choice but to use grey matter and consider 'reviewing conditioned beliefs'.
*

As 'discarded dildos' fathers are targeted and subjected to the usual 'run of the mill operations' by the 'fraudulently misrepresented services, as dispensed with and used by alleged servants of the public and the law', NOT FORGETTING THE CONVERTS : the corrupted who join the fraudsters-club after signing on the dotted line; refer to our exclusive page, linked to from here and wake up sucker-serfs. And the media Barons as puppeteers who control the Intellectual Prostitutes dangling on their strings, materialisation of the plans of the fraudsters behind it all; the herding the sheeple straight to the New World Order plans for mankind, total control of 'the conditioned, the ill-educated non-thinkers, >the created sucker-serfs and 'shitizens'<.

*Link from here to a page from explicit submissions to Bow County Court when the gestation vessel in Andrew's life was being used by the abusers of the courts facilities, as others arranged and prepared the gestation vessel for. The others themselves obliging the creators of the states, the legal circles and other public servants, who collectively abuse public facilities in order for the maligned, the envious and the spiteful to use the created FALSE STATES, as informed and used tools TO & FOR THE GOALS of all > the users and the used -the last to benefit as assured tools, at the expense of the targeted sucker-serf, 'the idiot, who dared to challenge and instigate legal proceedings against 'protected fraudsters'.
*

All 'fathers' -discarded dildos and sperm providers- at some time have had the 'pleasure of encounters with the administrators of long existing 'plans for the sons of men'; 'mankind' would be a better word, but as the 'males only' (in the main) are the targeted sucker-serfs' we rather stick to the original script as delivered to mankind over two millennia ago by wily fraudsters.

*

For decades -as of the days when Andrew Yiannides was witnessing the break-up of the family of his friend, Michael-, what the alleged servants of the public and the law -from the police through to judicial chair occupants- engaged in, was altogether too obvious to grey matter users, to >THINKERS<.

*

Family destruction was part of the agenda served by the organisers of 'the human family'; the family, as conceived and executed by committed followers, administrators and executioners of the plans of the creators of the New World Order communities, societies and all PSEUDOdemocracies, promoted as the genuine article by the Media Barons and the Intellectual Prostitutes they retain and maintain*

*Link from here to acknowledgement of the imposed states on 'the conditioned sheeple', on the victims of organised fraud aplenty through abuse of the courts' facilities and as 'sucker-serfs' they have taxes imposed on them for such 'services'

*

Promoters of the New World Order for mankind, also, many misguided, ill-educated, misinformed and or otherwise committed politicians who are sucked into the ways of the fraudsters who came along 2300 years ago with the vile scripts and scenario -the alphabet- from which the creation of the three languages, tongues pointed to at http://www.justiceraped.org/2011/06/334 as presented to mankind by Andrew Yiannides, the creator of these pages for thinkers to consider and WAKE-UP.

*

As creator of the human-rights material, in the public domain -on the Internet- after 39 years of research and investigations -1972-201- resting and founded on 'the blunt abuse of the courts facilities', by licensed criminals -the legal circles- in the United Kingdom*, it was time to point to the connection between the abusers of the courts facilities and THE ROOT OF THE EVIL mankind has been and is being subjected to for centuries / millennia.

*Link from here to one of the disputed Protocols attributed to the elders of Zion and wake-up sucker-serfs. The material in the page points to suppressed realities which the fraudsters, the successors of the creators of the Old Testament vile scripts and scenarios, also the followers of such rubbish, through 'crimes against humanity aplenty', over the last two millennia, set out to destroy and suppress, as if control of all and everything was ever possible, when one deals with 'true humans and the human spirit'. 

*Link from here to an explicit quote form the New Testament. In the page we point to, the material relates to study and research on  the disputed 'protocols' and recorded realities no one can discard while promoting the Old Testament vile scripts and scenarios as alleged Holy Scriptures.

*Link from here to another explicit quote form the New Testament and thereat consider making time to 'study' our page / representations and submissions born of research on the disputed 'Protocols of the Elders of Zion'.

*

The very root has been and IS MOST CLEARLY POINTED TO IN OUR PAGES*

*Link from here to an explicit extract / script from the creation of criminals, promoted for centuries / millennia as alleged Holy Scriptures by fraudsters and followers and promoters of such vile scripts

*

The scenario, as copied, is from the most vile of works ever to have been misrepresented to mankind -to the conveniently ill-educated and the misinformed 'sheeple : the sucker-serfs'.

*

READ, WHAT THE ABUSERS OF THE LEGAL SYSTEM & THE COURTS FACILITIES ENGAGED IN SUBSEQUENTLY. The victim, thanks to her parts as a fraud of a human -one of many- who were sent along to abuse Andrew Yiannides' time and the patience he allowed her -and all others- to benefit from WHILE HER / THEIR PARTS IN THE RAMPANT FRAUD ON THE TAXPAYERS, were noted, because of the warranted need to EXPOSE the maintenance engineers created.

*Link from here to the page where we publish a transcript from a hearing at Barnet County Court - London, when 'the venue was for the registration of an alleged judgement proper at the Employment Tribunal FOR THE COSTS IMPOSED BY THE ABUSES OF THE TRIBUNAL'S FACILITIES thereafter for the targeted victim 'family' to benefit from the enforcement of the judgement 'costs'. ALL AND EVERYTHING INTENDED TO lead to the application, as intended by all, to the European Court for Human Rights and the rewards under the table care of the arrangements in place FOR RAMPANT FRAUD ON THE TAXPAYERS, as we point out in our explicit page, linked to from here. We simply repeat and emphasise the simple fact that NOT ONE OF THE ALLEGED victim-challengers we name in our pages were and have been working for the benefits the system affords to the THE CORRUPTED, the most dangerous of the alleged humans created by the organisers of all PSEUDOdemocracies. After reading the transcript simply consider the one and gibe-away element "WHY DID THE HUSBAND OF THE VICTIM OF THE ABUSED EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNAL, VISIT Andrew Yiannides and in the presence of Andrew's octogenarian mother and his sister THREATEN TO BEAT ANDREW TO DEATH, if he was not part of the constructive fraud on the taxpayers, on hearing of Andrew's intention to publish the transcript on the Internet? Why the objections to the warranted need to ensure the taxpayers should read OF THE REALITIES WE COVER and point to for all to refer and point all other taxpayers to the facts of life in the UK, a typical PSEUDOdemocarcy? NOTE that the person who introduced 'the victim family', Mr William Spring was informed of the threats; Mr Spring as a typical convert to and lover of the suppression of the realities, SIMPLY IGNORED IT ALL while engaging in many an alleged production for the benefit of the suckers who are drawn into the labyrinths of intrigue and more often that not to deception aplenty.
*

ONGOING FOR DECADES, the breaches of trust and the abuse of the courts facilities. As of the days when Andrew had been 'the targeted victim & sucker-serf', care of the criminal activities the legal circles, engaged and indulged in within the confines of the Royal Courts of Justice. All and everything with the blessings of the police and Ministers in the United Kingdom : a typical PSEUDOdemocracy.

*Link from here to the
*

Most loud and clear the implications -a hint, through the material as presented in the webpage when one considers WHICH LEGAL CASE and what the background to the case had been. More to the point, WHAT THE CORRUPTED VICTIM (the used sucker-serf, 'a woman' of the Divorce Industry) SET OUT TO DO FOR HER PARENTS and how the case was and remains a perfect specimen for a typical 'Tower of Babel' scenario as hinted by the creators of the vile old Testament rubbish and the alleged creator of all and everything some wily and craft-y fraudsters concocted some 2500 years ago, the one who engaged with others in the scenario / script for the Tower of Babel makes most clear.

The facts of life in the United Kingdom were related in graphic detail to the mother of the children Ms Kyriaki / Koulla Demetriou Evangelou, when their mother, as a refugee from Cyprus, following the Turkish invasion of the island, sought refuge in the United Kingdom where she had family. Details of the circumstances under which the meeting and introduction to Miss Kyriaki / Koulla Demetriou Evangelou will be related in due course as part of the revelations attached to and born of the organised betrayal of the trust of the ordinary citizens of the Republic of Cyprus.

flyawayr.jpg (28154 bytes)
Poster delivered to the office of the school of the children after 'their loving mother' took them away, as part of her vile blackmailing practices at every opportunity others created and used her for their own evil ends, as shall be established.

.

*  The poster on the left SAYS IT ALL.
*  The gestation vessel, -an alleged human- indulged in use of the children in conjunction with her other long ongoing vile activities.
*  Blackmail was the gestation vessel's renewed 'evil ploy'. As a typical abuser of children she engaged in what others were guiding and 'using her' for, as 'the others' were while anticipating of the father to simply rush to some fraudsters licensed by the Law Society and thereby / thereafter simply the usual abuse of the courts facilities 'by licensed criminals'.
*  It goes without saying that the targeting of family assets and the attached 'elimination of the sperm provider', from the children's lives, WAS THE MAIN OBJECTIVE OF ONE & ALL, especially those who were using the gestation vessel for their own evil ends in anticipation of the usual activities by the legal circles.
*  One and ALL WERE VERY FAMILIAR WITH THE CRIMINAL ACTIVITIES ONGOING WITHIN THE COURTS, care of blunt contempt of the law by the legal circles, who indulged at the expense of Andrew the targeted 'sperm-provider', with the blessings of the police between 1969 and 1978, hence the conclusion on 'reliance'.

Time for all users of the encouraged gestation vessel, Kyriaki/Koulla Demetriou Evangelou, after the maligned parasite Constantine/Costas Kyriacou Joannides interfered in the career and the rights of Andrew Yiannides, to climb down from cloud cuckoo-land. 
Immaterial if the maligned parasite was a used & encouraged stooge or simply a product of the conspiracy he entered into with his partners in the fish and chips business, the Antoniades' couple.
Everything had been arranged between the parasite and the fraud of a father of five -one Kyriacos Petrou Joannides- and the other two fraudsters Maria Kyriacou Joannides-Antoniades & Savvas Kyriacou Petrou Joannides.
ONE & ALL HAD BEEN & CARRIED ON RELYING* on the type of public and legal services* the sucker-serfs benefit from, in ALL PSEUDOdemocracies, care of the arrangements Andrew Yiannides has been exposing and challenging in the public domain for years. [*Link from here to evidence establishing the criminal activities by alleged Honourable officers of the Supreme Court and other officers of the Law, in the United Kingdom].
BUT with the added element, that one and all were made aware of the fact that Andrew had secured evidence in support of his conclusions, decades before the evidence was released in the public domain, on the Internet. 
...

Follow articles by 'Diogenis' at http://www.justiceraped.org and benefit from the realities suppressed for centuries 

This page is dedicated to three self appointed Freemason bashers. The three (1) Mr James Todd, (2) Mr Maurice Kellett and (3) Mr. Paul Talbot-Jerkins, most vociferous and outspoken in their ranting. Craft-y and conniving as all three turned out to have been, while serving other plans. At best all three were / are serving the imposed states in pseudo-democracies through their subliminal indoctrination promotions. We explain the logic behind the aforesaid opinion: Each one in his own way simply repeats the same opinions and ideas relentlessly and accuses the Freemasons, as a body and organisation known and practising everywhere the 'policies and the Brotherhood's plans for mankind as a self-promoting group of 'philanthropists'. None of them ever came up with any evidence or proof that their opinions rest and are founded on solid ground or legitimate foundations. In fact the effect of their ranting has a basis: That basis rests on the repetitious (indirect) promotions of their assertions (and from other Freemason bashers) collectively amounting to: "Don't do what I did and do, because they will do to you, as they did to me". All came along complaining of the relentless suppression of material facts and the activities AS INDULGED INTO BY THE LEGAL CIRCLES & ENTERTAINED, *IF NOT INSTIGATED*, BY JUDICIAL CHAIR OCCUPANTS, while the media barons and the IP's they retain just twiddle their thumbs. All three were/are complaining of events and activities, within the courts, while promoting their personal VIEWS & OPINIONS. Odd it never was that the most referred to and quoted by all, was the Great Puke Production Machine, Mr. James Todd of VOMIT (Victims Of Masonic Ill Treatment) repute, who failed & fails to honour his own undertakings.(*Details on request / email)

The right to reply and to justify behaviour in general towards the founder of human-rights and the work all three had and have access, also to justify their activities and their arrogant defaults to apply their alleged concerns to matters we cover in our pages, to which all three were pointed repeatedly do warrant and command justification. Anything they may care to submit to us, will be published in this page and pointed to from other pages. We will also publish any Logical or Legal Argument that shall arise out of their submissions, as the situations command.

Read, below explicit submissions to the letters editor of 'The Times' in 1996.

The need to communicate, at the time, in the context of the letter, arose when Dr. Tate came up with a 'brilliant idea' for the Department of Education, in the United Kingdom. The idea simply: 'The Department should 'introduce its own code of conduct and morals'. He cited, at the time, the failures of the three main religions in the UK and PARENTS who fail to instil in the upbringing of children appropriate guidance in such matters; it goes without saying that in view of dwindling church attendance the lack of moral education was wrongly and with intent wilfully blamed on religious leaders as well, not just the parents. The 'joke' that the Education Authorities should introduce some code for the schools to implement IGNORED THE EXISTING FOUL CONTRIBUTION by the education authorities & system in operation for decades as the submitted and suppressed letter, from the concerned father who clearly stated the FACTS & the REALITIES, imposed on 'the serfs'. It is for the reader & researcher to consider the realities and the forces at work, after accessing 'the plans for the sons of men' to which we point to in three explicit pages 1. org/protocol.htm 2. org/humraped.htm 3. org/intropro.htm

Read the text on the rightltt96asr.jpg (60198 bytes)
The above to the letters editor of 'The Times'.  His indifference to the issues pointed and covered as gross as they come. The proof is in the response, as received, below.
tnpja96r.jpg (21973 bytes)
Readers / visitors who publish in the public domain are invited to contact us to exchange links in order to inform the world jury of the evil plans to impose Dictatorial States on mankind everywhere.

Below, in HTML, the content of the letter to the editor of 'The Times', in January 1996.

16th January 1996

The Editor
The Times

My Ref.:      16JPCCDP
Your Ref.:   School Chiefs Set Out New Codes of values.

FAX to:       0171-782-5046

Sir

The change of direction by the politically correct has been long overdue. Any code of values ought to, and must be based on true democratic principles. For far too long our teachers (and those guiding and or instructing them) have concentrated on the individual and thereby promoting selfishness without any respect for any other but one's self, values that extended to one's own needs, leading to utter disregard for all others. All others alas, to include parents.

I recollect my son, at the ripe old age of six asserting to me: "You can't talk to me like that, I HAVE RIGHTS'. It was sadly, as a result of my having to tell him off for upsetting his mother. I was informed that HE WAS TAUGHT OF SUCH matters at school. I simply took him to his room, put some of his clothing in a plastic bag and told him that I was to take him to school the following morning in order to deliver him up to his brilliant teachers and tell them that they would be welcome to have him in their homes where he could practice his rights at their expense and peace of mind. He begged me no to do so, for he did not want to 'upset' his teachers.

Odd that our politically correct, some years ago had been proclaiming the colonies were not fit to govern themselves, even though thousands of such far away lands had indeed studied in our universities. The very same 'boffins' assumed the right to interfere in the families and homes of their own citizens, thus creating the society they wished to build. Sadly to discover rather belatedly, THEY were wrong. Democracy without consensus? The individual who has more rights than the majority he or she is affecting through his/her indulgences has been the penultimate anathema imposed on the rest of us by the 'politically correct'.

Sincerely

Andrew Yiannides
65 Abbot's Park Road
London E10

* Visitors / readers and CONCERNED PARENTS must access Isocrates' words from 'Aeropagiticos' in our quotes page from here and consider the fact that the father's letter -above- was not considered suitable for the average reader of 'The Times', as the letter from Mr Kadleigh evidently was. Mr Kadleigh wrote of 'our civilisation' (!) as the Letters Editor or the editor in chief of 'The Times' considered such an assertion as factual, when in fact the editor of 'The Times' IF correctly educated, ought to have known that such was NOT the case. Mr Kadleigh was writing of the Hellenes -the Greeks to the disrespectful and to the vulgar- as the father who knew and had recognised the realities behind the ongoing plans for mankind > the New World Order < decades earlier. The father, however, wrote of 'the Politically Correct' who have been imposing their evil ways in our days as followers of the Abductors and Rapists of DEMOCRACY & JUSTICE; the latter have been imposing their vile -used here as the anagram of evil- plans for humanity, as of the days when fraudsters, 2300 years ago delivered their alleged Holy Scriptures and their creation, the alleged creator of all and everything, to Ptolemy of Egypt under specific circumstances. We urge all serious readers / researchers to access 'Diogenis' articles at www.justiceraped.org/2011/06/334 and grasp the implications attached to the creation of different tongues / languages / religions born out of the same alphabet >the Old Testament RUBBISH. Thereat it is expected, at the very least, of some readers to consider *WHY ignore the obvious*, when armed with the words of Isocrates some 2 centuries and well over 1000 years before the fraudsters were caused to go along with their vile creation to Ptolemy of Egypt. Access from here confirmation, an article By Sir Frederic Kennyon in the mid-1950s and do NOTE the fact that creators of the Old Testament RUBBISH, did NOT present to mankind their vile scripts in their own language, until after the third language -religion- failed to conquer Europe, the continent targeted by the very followers and promoters of the alleged Holy Scriptures and the alleged creator of all and everything. Odd that 10 years later -2006- the letters editor of 'The Times' published the revealing letter from Mr. Frank Ryder of Stafford, -below- qualifying the most important of aspects in so far as the Hellenic language goes and the folly of suppressing such realities when promoting the partners of the fraudsters who created the alleged creator of all and everything, the Romans and the language created centuries after the Hellenic civilisation was targeted for 'elimination and burial deep in the dark caves where the followers and promoters of evil have been congregating for well over 2 millennia, at the very least.   

Needles to say the retained and controlled, by invisible forces, Intellectual Prostitute was simply serving and promoting 'undeclared agendas for the serfs'; hence the reasons for 'the convenient failure' to publish the letter for consideration by the 'sheeple' the I.Ps serve as 'good shepherds'. Of such activities and arrogant failures to put to the 'sheeple' the facts and realities FOR CHOICE. Of such services, by the programmed I.P's who simply adhere to the guidelines in place, by their controllers. They simply work for the creation and development of pseudo-democracies which the very Intellectual Prostitutes promote to the ill-informed 'electorate' as if, the genuine article.

*Link from here to explicit plans (in place for centuries / millennia) by the criminals who set out to take control of all and everything on planet earth 

Interestingly, it mattered not that the I.P, at 'The Times', elected to ignore the above letter. Whether it was because of the truths and the realities the author, a concerned father (*F1), put forward or because of the origins of the author who wrote of the Dominions and the standard of education that Her Majesty's Colonial Subjects had been benefiting from, including graduation from universities in the United Kingdom, made no difference. It could have been a case of the origins of the author but amazingly the I.P did publish a letter from a gentleman, who pointed to THE ORIGINS of our (?) civilisation (!). The last, miraculously wrote of elements from the very civilisation and culture that produced the author of the rejected / ignored letter. From such practices & with such 'brilliant' Intellectual Prostitutes in key places, the information channels fool the electorate & play havoc with the lives of the ill-educated, the naive, the gullible and the conditioned -as with the stooges and morons we name and expose in our pages as non-humans, arrogant dreamers, non-thinkers and fraudsters-club-recruits, such as the products of the fraudulent court productions & activities create.

As long as the plans of the masters progress through the arrangements hatched up in the course of meetings between the controllers, non-elected manipulators, all is fine and moving in the direction of the pre-planned total and absolute control, dictatorship.

*Link from here to the conclusions of the founder of the human-rights organisation as of 1972-1975

*Link from here to evidence attached to >THE IN SECRET HATCHED UP ARRANGEMENTS FOR THE SERFS< by persons who misrepresent themselves as if acting for 'the serfs / the taxpayers, after securing representation as typical hypocrites; their activities relate to their own collective plans for the suckers-serfs they allegedly represent. Among the hypocrites who misrepresent themselves the solicitor Kypros Nicholas (*F3), who engaged in criminal activities with other abusers of the legal system and the courts, leading to the imposed criminal states on Andrew Yiannides that commanded the research and the investigations ongoing for almost  four decades (as of March 1972), by the concerned father who authored the letter to the editor of 'The Times'.

*Link from here to the page where we publish the blunt FORGERY created and promoted for and in respect of a concocted defence to a claim issued out of the High Court founded and resting on COMMERCIAL FRAUD.

*Link also from here to a House of Lords ruling and deliberations -in 1940- when their Lordships applied their considered views on matters pertaining to the duties of solicitors (as officers of the Supreme Court), to the Court & Justice itself; also in respect of matters that relate and point to CONSPIRACY as well as to elements that relate to suppression of facts & realities by electing to remain silent and through silence conscious imposition of wrongs and damages to third parties.

drtat96f.jpg (71295 bytes)
The above letter on the same issue of 'morals & teachings'. The letters editor apparently knows of the civilisation many have been attempting to bury for over 1700 years. In the meantime simply promotions of all manner of falsehoods while the original GNOSIS ignored by the mainstream as arranged by education chiefs in allegedly true Democratic states.

Below, the content of the letter (image on the left) in HTML for links to & from.

Schools' role in moral education

From Sergei Kadleigh, Bristol

Sir, Perhaps maxims would be more appropriate than commandments. For example, something like the last five of the 150 maxims enshrined at the Temple of Apollo at Delphi, defining the virtue of an ideal Greek at the time of the birth of our civilisation: "In childhood learn good manners; in youth learn to control your passions; in middle age learn to be just, in old age learn to be a wise council; die without regret".

Yours faithfully,

SERGEI KADLEIGH,
Flat B,
12 Miles Road, Clifton, Bristol.
January 16.

And in 2006, ten years on, more concerns and debates on the subject of education. The letters editor at 'The Times', the prestigious, published a gem from an octogenarian who expressed his views on the Hellenes / the Greek language.

tljn06cf.jpg (250218 bytes)
Dedicated to the ill educated sheeple; to all serfs, victims' of alleged servants of the public & the Law in allegedly civilised Democracies

Below the content of the letter to the editor of 'The Times', as published on 15th July 2006.

Sir,

Recent letters about Latin in Education raise a case of non omnia possumus omnes.

I took Latin at school nearly 70 years ago, and its only use has been to establish snob status in conversations. I could have done without Latin and without French - both are singularly useless to the development of the mind.

Oh, that I had taken Greek! I have been trying to learn it for the past 20 years, but my old brain simply will not retain it. I struggle to read the Ancient writers in my original texts.

Greek opens doors on matters of principle, not only in our European languages but in our Western heritage and thinking; our arts, sciences, religions, politics and life attitudes. Greek humanism proposes that "Man is the measure of all things". We forget it at our peril.

The purpose of education is the rediscovery of such matters of principle. Education differs from training, which is about conditioning. People can be trained to use a gun, or to worship fairies or to speak French, but you cannot educate them to do so.

FRANK RYDER

Stafford.

*************************************************************

>> The creator of these pages thanks Mr Ryder and the letters editor of 'The Times' for recognition of the suppressed realities <<
NOTE: The messages from Mr Ryder, from Andrew Yiannides to the wily Norman Scarth whose teachers taught him the K.I.S.S. principle 

Need one to point visitors to the wilful suppression of the views of a concerned father of Hellenic / Greek origins, whose contribution on matters of education, 10 years earlier*, was suppressed by 'The Times'? [*access from here -above- the suppressed letter, released in our pages in 1997]

 

Below article, for the Highburian, by the concerned father who wrote to the editor of 'The Times' [above in 1996] relates to teachings through examples and experiences from life. It is in HTML format, for links to and from the text.

OF THE NEED FOR RULES

I have had the opportunity to work with some of you recently. The big question at the school, as you probably know, made headlines in the National Press. This remains an element which no one can overlook. The fact that the matter is addressed and openly debated is a very healthy sign indeed and a most encouraging element for all concerned.

Observing and talking with some of you I felt that I should relate a personal experience which may well prove to be food for thought for all you Highburians caught in the eternal ‘battle of the generation gap’.

Two years ago my own young son pleaded for a video console system because most of his classmates had one. The fact that for years he owned a computer which accepted its own video game cartridges was irrelevant. He had to have the same console as the other boys at school so that he could discuss with them the various ‘moves’ and ‘tricks’. Mother relented eventually and after he spent hours on end trying out his ‘skills’ in front of the television at the expense of the other more important matters, such as his lessons, ignoring also the ensuing arguments with other family members because of the relentless and repetitive noises produced with each success and failure.

Mother begun to get angry at his failures to recognise he was infringing on the rights of others while I pretended to go along with him and expressed interest in everything he was trying to do. I asked him ‘to educate me’ and to enlighten me as to what he was attempting to do and why. Finally mother could no longer tolerate the relentless noises from the television set; she made her views known in very clear terms. She was going to take away the console and dispose of that intruder in our lives. Our son had to accept the inevitable; his right to enjoy himself had been infringing on the rights of other family members. The bad side effects of his right to enjoy himself did trespass on to the rights of the majority (which included his younger sister). The situation could no longer be ignored.

It was the right time for me to express my views and to ‘educate him’ using his own chosen medium; that infernal video console. I pointed out to my son that: ‘Just Like The Rules He Had To Accept And Go Along With, In order To Move From Level To Level In Each Video Game, So It Is In Life At Home, And At School AND At Work. And In Every Other Area of Human Endeavour. I also informed him that the other species besides the human animal, on our planet, developed their own orderly and organised existence, which are governed by logical rules. As one obeys the rules and makes the right moves in each video game, so one has to obey society’s established rules and make the right moves at home, at school, at college, at university and at work for an orderly progression to take effect.

It is through acceptance and compliance with each game rule at each level hat one moves on to the next stage and level. Consider these simple facts and resolve to move on in your lives. Do not get stuck at entry level. Consider these rules and GO ON TO HIGHER AND BETTER LEVELS than you have been stuck on. Just like the satisfaction you have when in reaching the top level in a video game, resolve to be tomorrow’s business managers, inventors, millionaires and whatever you wish to be in your lives ahead. Use NOW wisely the tools available to you because time marches on and waits for no one. There can be no return to the school years. There can be only problems ahead if you get stuck and remain at entry level.

GOOD LUCK with your efforts. Work with those who are here to help you to break the codes so that YOU CAN MOVE UP TO OTHER LEVELS, THOSE THAT WILL MAKE REACHING YOUR DESIRED GOALS POSSIBLE.

Andrew Yiannides NDD., ACFI., ATI.,
London

[*Link from here to the page where we publish a letter pointing to scenarios organised by abusers of public office as they arranged through 'a used selfish, and naive gestation vessel'. The original scenario and consequential scripts and scenarios were criminally intended and used for the imposition of 'pre-organised and arranged plans for the targeted sperm provider in the instance at hand'. Of such realities many the victims of the organised break-up of families and the destruction of same through abuse of the courts' facilities as arranged by the organisers in the course of alleged legitimate court proceedings. Every one of the victims of the divorce industry who had been afforded the information and pointed to the fact that evidence to be used in order to expose the organised crimes against humans by and through alleged servants of the public].

Master Alexandros Y
??????
?????
????
???
??
?

30 June 1996

My Ref. 3OJCOLAP

Your Ref. Your Birthday

lptajn96.jpg (138771 bytes)

Alexandros
You are sixteen to-day. I attach copy (reprint) of the letter which I had cause to write to your school on 25th September 1992. As I promised (at the time of the events stated in the letter) I now afford you the opportunity to know of who and what I am made of. HOW I cared and feared for YOUR future. The ancient Greeks coined
"?µ?????? ?????? ?????????? ?????" and modern man through Sigmund Freud twisted it around to "We are all the products of our childhood".

As you read through the letter I did not wish for you to know the content of, you will recollect that I also did not allow you to attend the meeting your mother and I alone had with the deputy head of the school. You will recollect that the teacher, Ms Dear (I loved HER choice of Ms by your teacher, not Miss nor Mrs either; it exposed more than enough) was asked to leave the room by the Deputy Head; he had read my letter just as the head who did not wish to speak with me on the day of the events. The causes and the subject matter of the letter may or may not help you to understand ‘the idiot’ but you can rest assured that what you experienced in life so far it is nothing. Let those events and what I did and tried to do for you help you now; you only have to make the wrong choice ones and you take the downward slide; often enough it is others who make the wrong decisions which affect you and you must learn to distinguish between the naive and the deliberate. I made my own choices in life and allowed and used what I regarded and regard to be the right guiding lights; unlike others I took no liberties with the rights of others. I acted honestly and honourably throughout; I have hurt no one and helped many. I have no regrets.

You have had the opportunities so far to get to know of the "bricks mortar and money revellers; those who have no respect for others, as Ritou told me (and Christina too) on Holy Thursday 1993 before we went to Ayios Eleftherios that evening. You know of and may one day realise what, how and who "did not care about people" (her words at the time). In that tragic case it was people who did not care before and AFTER her tragic statement to all; and all who ignored her before ignored her statement too; AND they have carried on in much the same way SINCE.

When you hear and know of those who care not about people and their activities before, after and since, you might perhaps elect and choose for yourself the path you will follow. The choice is yours; let no other make it for you; let no one else ‘impose’ on you their ways. You will get to know of man’s and God’s Laws as you go along life’s way. You have already seen and lived through the effects of lies, dishonesty, theft and malice; worse the effects for GREED, through such activities. You have seen how such activities affect others, the victims; you yourself have been the victim of greed, envy, spite and lies by those who ‘befriended’ you. The letter declaration from ‘my mother(?)’ which I gave to Artemis on father’s day may well have opened your eyes to the ways of others; the dishonest, the liars and the hypocrites. I used to speak to you of "????? µ?? ???? ??????? ??? ?? ??? ?? ????? ?????"; the equivalent in English is "Birds of a feather FLOCK together’; I say no more. Use the truth and the facts, blame others not for your own wrong choices and decisions.

Best wishes

Andrew Yiannides

ENCL.

Mr H Freed, BA(Hons), MA, PGCE

Headteacher
Leytonstone School
Colworth Road
Leytonstone
London
E11 1JD

My Ref. PRA11992
Your Ref. MF411

25th September 1992

OPEN LETTER

Page1emmalas1.jpg (89501 bytes) Page2
emmalas2.jpg (166369 bytes)
Page3
emmalas3.jpg (154307 bytes)
Page4
emmalas4.jpg (163491 bytes)
Page5
emmalas5.jpg (48108 bytes)

Dear Mr Freed

I refer to my visit yesterday afternoon, as soon as our son Alexandros came home from school with cuts and scratches on both sides of his neck and face which he had sustained through an unprovoked attack on his person by a girl.

In accordance with your statements, to me, no investigation whatsoever had taken place even though three hours had lapsed since that vicious attack on him. And although a victim with injuries which were bleeding, your staff simply elected to treat him as the aggressor holding him in punishment without any attendance to his injuries, whatsoever.

I was told by you that Alexandros had, in the course of this week, been involved in two fights with one other boy and that the previous day outside school hours he had ‘beaten’ up a younger boy. You then proceeded to ask me if Alexandros had told me of these events. You also stated that the distressed condition I was in, and my anger, were not conducive to having a ‘normal’ conversation, dismissing thereby the day’s events, and the purpose of my visit, with other issues.

As I stated before leaving your office, since Alexandros came to Leytonstone School my wife and I have worked with teachers in order that their ‘work’ might not be undermined in any way; school records, if properly kept, will bear me out on this. I also pointed out that school staff may encourage and or approve of girls at the school to be assertive and aggressive; my wife and I do not. Last year Alexandros barely started his school year when one particular girl persistently insisted to be his girl friend; she even went as far as to deploy another young girl in order to force herself on Alexandros. Nobody cared and nobody spoke to the girls; when he reacted by throwing one girl’s school satchel in the dustbin and pushed the other away/down he was branded as aggressive because of his momentary and impulsive reactions which were brought about as a result of the girls’ unattended to by school staff persistence. And when I related this issue to you yesterday, you dismissed it as of no consequence!! ! To this day we do not know how the two girl’s persistent and aggressive impositions on Alexandros were treated by the school staff. You dismissed the start of school records on a young boy in such circumstances as of no relevance and of no consequence! I ! I ! I begged to disagree stating that on this occasion I will not let the issue in the hands of school staff, especially since they elected to react by prejudging and ignoring the day’s event through other issues.

Before leaving your office I asked of you to furnish me with the name and the address of the girl who had ‘been involved in a fight’ with Alexandros; you defaulted to comply, even though I stated that I wished to see her parents and for myself to check if she had sustained any injuries and or visible signs in the course of ‘the fight’. After leaving your office I proceeded to go with Alexandros to the home of a boy who had earlier, in accordance with what Alexandros told me, been attacked and kicked in the groin by the very same girl who attacked Alexandros. At that boy’s home and in the presence of his mother and sister he related the girl’s aggressive weight and height throwing and bullying antics; this spontaneous statement by the boy I recorded. Satisfied that the attack on Alexandros was an unjustified and unprovoked attack I attended the police where the matter was reported as a crime because Alexandros had sustained injuries which all at school ignored deliberately, the reason of my anger and the issue which caused me to come to the school and seek a meeting with you.

I took Alexandros to our doctor this morning where he was examined and the injuries he sustained were duly recorded. He was also administered a Tetanus booster injection by the doctor, which the doctor considered essential in view of the cuts and the conditions under which he had sustained them; this the doctor did of his own and without any questions and or prompting from me.

Because I had asked the other boy, yesterday, to enquire of other pupils at school about that specific girl’s aggressive mentality I received a telephone call this evening from the mother of a boy who had also been attacked and kicked/kneed in the groin by the girl. The mother invited me to her home in order that we might meet and discuss the matter. To begin with she informed me that she had in fact recently written to the school and had received/letter in response from Ms V J Dear wherein she was promising to look into the complaint made about the girl’s attitude and mentality. I invited the boy (Delgardo) to relate to me what happened, and in the presence of his mother and father he begun to tell me how he had witnessed what happened to my son. Alexandros apparently asked the girl in question if she had really kicked Demetri in the groin (Demetri had just related such an event to Alexandros) and her reaction was "Yeah. Do you want to know what it feels like?", at the same time moving in to attack Alexandros, who turned his back to avoid being kicked/kneed in the groin; the girl then grubbed him by the neck , kneed him in the backside instead and pulled him to the ground where she viciously tried to strangle him. Alexandros, according to this corroborated evidence, suffered an unprovoked attack from a vicious girl who enjoys kicking and kneeing boys in their private parts; she, according to the information furnished to me by the three boys, is apparently taller and heavier than anyone else in her year and has even been known to attack persons in the fourth year because of her physique; this factor alone brings into question any attempt, by anybody, to suggest that boys invite trouble by tackling with her.

Worse still was the revelation from Delgardo that he had told Ms Dear what happened and how that girl attacked Alexandros (without due cause or justifiable reason, except perhaps an inherent mental attitude towards boys) right after the attack on Alexandros which should make it shortly after one o’clock. Ms Dear apparently then chose to remain indifferent, unconcerned and impassive to Alexandros’ injuries for the rest of the day, even defaulted to report to you what she had been told, (according to your statement to me) and to all intents and purposes other issues were of relevance but not the issue at hand (the event outside the room where Ms Dear had asked Alexandros to remain since morning).

Even worse, when I invited Alexandros to relate to me what happened yesterday, over the entire day, he begun by telling me why he attended the head of year teacher and how she enquired of him if he had been involved in an incident the previous day outside school hours. He was invited by Ms Dear to write down , on a piece of paper she handed him, the event which was of ‘immediate interest to her" over which she had elected to take prompt and unilateral action. Alexandros’ statement in response was handed to her about an hour or so later (playtime) and therein he related (according to his statement to me , which was confirmed last night by others who had witnessed the events of his written statement) the event, how it arose, how he was set up through lies (which the boy he hit did not deny to begin with) and HOW AFTER HE BECAME AWARE that others had set him up he knew he had made a mistake and that he had to apologise to the boy he hit (in line with his home upbringing, hence my wife’s and my interest in discipline at school as well, which you and your staff may well have misinterpreted). And as you were made aware yesterday, I knew nothing of the incident which you and your staff may well had viewed from the wrong angle; the fact remains that Alexandros not only admitted he was wrong BUT HE, OF HIS OWN VOLITION, APOLOGISED TO THE BOY FIRST THING IN THE MORNING on the way to school in the presence of witnesses. He has been brought up to recognise his mistakes, to seek to correct them and above all to accept punishment when that is called for; and that is why my wife and I have supported your staff without ever, to this day, any attempt to undermine them.

However, yesterday’s events have shed new light on your staffs approach and attitude. What we have on the one hand is pre judgement of an event on preconceived ideas and subsequently complete and utter indifference to injuries sustained through an unprovoked, unjustified and vicious attack by a girl who may well be twice the weight of Alexandros and apparently revels in such attacks on boys. Accordingly my decision to report the matter to the police, particularly since your staff remained~ indifferent to Alexandros’ injuries all day; and this attitude from a member of your staff who had received letters about the aggressive nature of the girl and her mentality.

Having examined Alexandros’ diary and duly noted the absence of any entries from school in respect of what I can now refer to as "alleged two fights with the same boy this week", I hereby request for an explanation from your office. I also request and demand for a copy of the written statement that Alexandros gave to Ms Dear yesterday in respect of the event outside school hours the day before.

In the circumstances I would respectfully submit that a teacher’s prime duty is to recognise the positive aspects of his/her pupils and cultivate them, not wily nilly to hinge on negatives (which they should work with co-operating parents to eradicate) and even whether justified or not (the latter being evident in this instance) seek to create conditions that are only conducive to character destruction and assassination through complex creating prejudices.

A copy of this letter will now be forwarded to the chair of Governors and the Chief Education Officer. It is our wish that the issues raised herein are fully and properly addressed. At the expense of repeating myself, yet again, the indifference displayed by Ms Dear to Alexandros’ injuries (which I have arranged to have photographed) was the main reason I came to see you yesterday. That issue alone exhibits and displays an approach which is way out of order and unacceptable from a teacher; in itself the matter should be referred to a child psychologist who should then report back to that teacher what she was actually achieving and or creating; furthermore the same psychologist should be afforded a copy of Alexandros’ statement as to the incident of the previous day so that he may form an informed opinion of the boy’s upbringing and true character, which through her failings (whether she recognises it or not) may well affect him and has given us the right to question her intentions.

Finally Mr Freed, what do you expect of children who are brushed aside when they complain to teachers about the behaviour of other children and the teachers do nothing ? Do you expect the children to remain passive victims? The issues must be properly addressed by ALL, parents, teachers and the Education Authority. I for my part will do what must be done to work with others. And to begin with it will be with the parents of the other victims of the weight and height pushing girl aggressor at the centre of the spade of events which appear not to have been addressed by the school despite letters from parents. When we placed our son in a co-educational school we wished for him to learn of co-existence with the opposite sex; we did not know of and or expect the school to be actively breeding nymphets and or amazons, Mr Freed.

Sincerely

Mr. A Yiannides NDD., ACFI.
65 Abbott’s Park Road
Leyton London EI0 6HU

FOOTNOTE:-
Footnote eXtra: In October 2010, the coalition's Attorney General, in an interview published by 'COUNSEL' specifically spoke of the police distancing themselves from cases of (small-fry) fraud and asserted that he was making that element his department's priority. IT REMAINS TO BE SEEN, WHAT the coalition of the Con-LibDems, THE GOVERNMENT OF THE DAY, WILL IN FACT ATTEND TO THE RAMPANT FRAUD. IF IT WILL DEAL APPROPRIATELY with the criminals who abuse public office, especially when faced with appropriate submissions and claims that will be delivered in due course. Visitors/readers are urged to read the article published in the London Evening Standard, as settled by the Rt. Hon. David Blunkett, Home Secretary in 2003 [*Link from here to the article we reproduce in another webpage and consider "Why tolerate the arrogance of the legal circles who had and have the audacity to assert to the lawmakers that the lawmakers have nothing to do with the law"]. While there, above it, the explicit letter to ex-Minister, the Rt. Hon. Frank Field MP, delivered a few days earlier. ALL alleged victim-challengers who contacted Andrew Yiannides, by the time the letter was sent to the Minister, received copy of the letter just as they received copies of other letters submitted to government maintained Ministers and other official appointees to public office. Accessing the material pointed to from the letter (URLs) is of utmost importance. It should assist 'recognition of the citizen's rights at work', when called upon properly in truly democratic states. The above in 2003; there were other 'submissions' and among such civilised and, within the law, approaches by citizens that led to the right actions by governments, the explicit challenges when we set about exposing one of the most evil of alleged victims of the legal circles to have ever contacted us [*Link to our explicit submissions to (a)  the Prime Minister, (b) the Chancellor / Treasury, (c) the Home Secretary. WE acted so after we had secured more than enough evidence about the parts of an alleged victim whose only interests were (i) the rewards under the table FOR KEEPING QUIET about the ORGANISED FRAUD THROUGH ABUSE OF THE COURTS' FACILITIES and (ii) her parts in blunt attempts that were intended to discredit the person she was sent along to mess about with, Mr Andrew Yiannides]. Access please the letter to the Home Secretary, the Rt. Hon. Jack Straw, in December 1998 [*Link* [*L] from here to the letter] and note the results evinced in the newspaper article (Hornsey Journal) also within days of the letter reaching its destination. Many the charlatans and stooges -lovers and 'promoters of the system as is'- on the job for decades; one and all acting as sold souls always do [*Link [*L] from here to the evidence we point to relative to the parts of one of a number of sold to the system fraudsters who were sent along / introduced to Andrew Yiannides by the managers / organisers of the LIPS crowd / mob].
   1.   The letter to 'The Times' (above) clarified and qualified the father's concerns after the arrogant interference in the family's peace of mind and well-being. Only idiots and non-thinkers can fail to catch on to the simple fact that the father's concerns were founded and rested on inexcusable and unjustified 'teachings' by some idiot who was acting on and following policies hatched up by others as directed by 'politically correct' morons who were / are acting on created states and situations as arranged by the directors of most, if not all, of mankind's tribulations for centuries, millennia. Realities such as the scenario covered in the letter to 'The Times', and the reckless failure by the puppet dangling on the strings of the media Barons lead to the state of ill-informed and conditioned serfs and slaves. Serfs enslaved to the rubbish promoted by the media Barons, as planned and hatched up by the creators of most, if not all, of mankind's tribulations for centuries / millennia. Refer to the words of an ex Chief of Staff with 'The New York Times', John Swainton, linked to from here, and recognise why he spoke as he did only when he was moving out of the firing line - retiring. The realities pointed to from here should be of interest to 'humans', to persons who use information imparted & received in the only way that 'alive grey-matter users, persons who are gifted with an alive mind should and must. Many the allegedly concerned victim-challengers who failed to act as expected of them.
    2.   Readers, researchers and victim / visitors should link from here to the extracts we copied, in our quotes page, from the work of Frank Schaeffer 'Dancing Alone'; therein, among other issues the author refers to the Social Workers, in the USA operating as 'the only glaziers in town, going around smashing windows'. The mother of the children, in the instance at hand, was fully aware of the fact that in 1974-1975 in letters to the Social Services maintained by the London Borough of Islington (North Central London) the father of her lifeless properties had written in very similar terms to the head of the Department at the LBI, when writing in respect of his best friend's children and how those lifeless 'properties were being used by the mother who brought them into the world. It suffices to point out that in that instance the mother was guided and assisted by the Social Workers who were operating out of the London Borough of Islington; always in accordance with the plans of the craft-y ones who set out to take control of all and everything by organising the lives of 'the serfs', the sons of men on planet earth. *Link from here to a reference from the disputed plans for mankind attributed to, but disputed as genuine, by 'The Elders of Zion'
    3.   Readers, researchers and the genuinely concerned victims of abused public services can and should *link from here to the page where we point to and expose through evidence (which no one can ever brush aside) the common roots & connection between the organisers, the creators and the promoters of false representations to the sons of men on planet earth. WE point to organised fraudsters who have been imposing (through participation in the most vile & evil in concept) LONG ONGOING CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUD ON MANKIND. The fraud we refer to has been ongoing for well over 2300 years, under various forms and guises but always resting and founded on the original and grossly misrepresented creation of and by criminals who set out to take control of all and everything through fraud and deceptions aplenty.
    4.   xxx
    5.   xxx

Back to Home Page To family.uk-human-rights.org/ To List of Affiliated web-sites To List of Web-sites Where Evil Practices ARE Exposed 
...
 

The creator of this website was inviting victims to access URrights & join him there with other victims to expose & challenge abusers of trust & public office until the providers of the facilities >ning.com< introduced new terms and conditions for the provision of the facilities. Access from here and read of the imposed states by the brains behind ning.com and consider only one element "WHY OBSTRUCT & HINDER THE DOWNLOAD of the existing material at URrights.ning.com >the intellectual properties of the creator of that presence on the Internet and those who joined him there? Read below of the unacceptable conduct and behaviour by the reckless abusers of trust, who set out to obstruct and blackmail the creator of URrights.ning

Persons who are genuinely concerned and object to the ways they were / are being treated by alleged servants of the publicand the law >in any PSEUDOdemocracy, or whatever states / conditions they are subjected to< by abusers of public facilities and public office >as we cover in our web-pages< should contact webmaster@human-rights.org for information relevant to the creation of similar facilities for INFOrmation on URrights, for facilities for URrights EUrope and for a NETwork of URrights activists.

  • APOLOGIES to friends and persons who could not access URrights following the recent changes by the providers of the facility (ning.com) Andrew Yiannides created and used the portal to create the presence on the Internet for the group of victims / challengers who joined with him to expose and challenge the arrogant and blunt abuse of public services in all allegedly civilised societies > PSEUDODEMOCRACIES <.

  • The changes related to the introduction of charges for the facilities, included the facility for ning.com to archive the material at URrights; also the facility to download the archived material to the creator's system (computer) while the creator and his group of friends considered which of the level of charges and service the group was to adopt.

  • HOWEVER the creator, Andrew Yiannides, WAS UNABLE TO DOWNLOAD THE ARCHIVED MATERIAL and all attempts to engage the providers and their staff in reasonable explanation as to WHY THE FAILURES TO CONNECT / DOWNLOAD from the ning.com servers THE ARCHIVED MATERIAL, were contemptuously ignored.

  • Emails to the Publicity, to the Promotion, to the Public Relations, also to the Chief Executive's Office merited no response whatsoever from anyone acting for ning.com

  • In the circumstances Andrew will appreciate any information related to the problems covered above. Andrew will also appreciate any information relative to exchanges with or email postings, from ning.com to existing members.

  • EXISTING URrights members, victims of the legal system, victims of solicitors and the courts should access the updated pages at .org/solicitors.htm and .org/solfraud.htm by using the links from the list below.

Below pages where we expose known lovers of it all, users and maintenance engineers of the system as is

.org/1999dfax.htm .org/1ofmany.htm .org/2lipstalk.htm .org/4deceit.htm .org/absolute.htm .org/abusers.htm
.org/account4.htm .org/actors.htm .org/actors2.htm .org/adoko.htm .org/bankers.htm .org/beware.htm
.org/blunket1.htm .org/chaldep1.htm .org/confraud.htm .org/contract.htm .org/convicti.htm .org/courts.htm
.org/corruptcourts.htm .org/crimesin.htm .org/dreamers.htm .org/evesused.htm .org/evilones.htm .org/famfraud.htm
.org/govolso.htm .org/guesswhy.htm .org/len.htm .org/mauricek.htm .org/media.htm .org/solfraud.htm
.org/solicitors.htm .org/someplan.htm .org/someploy.htm .org/thefacts.htm .org/theproof.htm .org/thenerve.htm
.org/twisted.htm .org/uaccount.htm .org/ukmm.htm .org/uwatchit.htm .org/watchit1.htm .org/yourtax.htm
  • Every single person we name and expose in the above pages elected to ignore THEIR OBLIGATIONS TO REPORT (to 'the serfs' = 'the taxpayers'), THE ABUSERS OF PUBLIC OFFICE & PUBLIC FACILITIES. All were/are relying on the Intellectual Prostitutes, from within the media, to keep it all in the family closet.
  • All, as typical twin-tongue hypocrites carry on complaining about the media for failing to report & for suppressing the facts and the realities they allegdely reported to the hard of hearing, to the otherwise committed angels blowing their silent trumpets for decades, all ready and gearing to welcome the expansion of the New World Order.
  • Of such parts the contributions from and failings of the persons we name and expose, AS IF THEIR OWN SILENCE, THEIR FAILURES  & THEIR BLUNT OBSTRUCTIONS to the work and other actions by the creator of this website, Andrew Yiannides, treated by one and all as if non-existent with the exception when the wily Norman Scarth, set off to abuse the trust he was allowed to benefit from, while his parts and questionable activities / performance were under scrutiny, specifically after HE FAILED to publish the full transcript of the Court of Appeal hearing HE WAS ALLOWED TO RECORD* [*Link from here to the food for thought page created by Andrew Yiannides, in the first instance].
  • Not one ever bothered to address the issues we expose in the explicit page, despite the fact that we have been pointing all of our contacts, since May 1992, to it all.
  • Visitors, readers and researchers are urged / invited to access and read the letter which the Hon. Secretary of the Litigants In Person Society, Mr. Norman Scarth sent to the founder of human-rights, Mr. Andrew Yiannides, reproduced in the page .org/4deceit.htm* [*L]
  • The author's statements, such as 'what for and why seek additional assistance', thereby spelling out his parts as a lover of it all.
  • Common sense dictates, that he should have directed his request to his partners in deceptions aplenty, one & all engaging in fraudulent misrepresentations AND NOTED TO HAVE, WILFULLY, BEEN SUPPRESSING, FROM THE TAXPAYERS, THE FACTS OF LIFE RELATIVE TO THE RAMPANT ABUSE OF THE COURTS FACILITIES as the failure of all to co-operate as covered and pointed to at:- [*L]. One and all fallen to the facilities for fraud aplenty on the taxpayers and the corruption of illiterates in law, the conditioned victims of the legal circles & courts who fall to the blackmail element attached to the REWARD for keeping the realities away from the taxpayers; just like the media and the Ministers responsible for the application of long existing law to the criminal activities we cover in our pages, do.
  • All the while one and all were / are engaging in the scenarios we cover in the exclusive page, which page the author of the letter which Mr Norman Scarth sent to Andrew Yiannides, afforded us the opportunity to address the issue of the contributions of his partners and affiliates in fraud aplenty on the taxpayers; despite the reminder one and all, named in the new page simply shoved it all in the dark corners of their devoid of grey matter skulls, their perverted / corrupted mind(s)

> MOST IMPORTANT <
On Sunday morning, the 19th September 2010, the Deputy Prime Minister, leader of the Liberal-Democrats in the course of the BBC TV politics programme, spoke of the coalition government's commitment to address the element of waste and fraud through the public services sector. We trust and hope that the elements we expose in our pages and the parts adopted by the conditioned victims of the legal circles, the persons who engage in PROMOTING & EXPANDING THE ONGOING CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUD ON THE TAXPAYERS, THROUGH ABUSE OF THE COURTS' FACILITIES, will be on the top of the list of government priorities.
Visitors, readers & researchers are urged to access the letters to Minister Frank Field [*L] after he had been directed by the Prime Minister to think/do the unthinkable.
Link also from here [*L] to the explicit letter to the Home Secretary in December 1998 with submissions arising out of the RAMPANT HOUSING BENEFIT FRAUD
On Tuesday 23rd November 2010, 'the Guardian' in its Comment & Debate page carried an article by Nick Clegg, the Deputy Prime Minister. In the evening of the same day the Deputy Prime Minister addressed a large audience at Kings place in respect of the government's changes on university students fees / loans.
Access from here the page where we reproduce an image of 'the Guardian' article & consider the simple fact that we, alone, have been asserting and proclaiming our objections to the theft of funds from the national budget leading to the ever-increasing annual deficit in the state's balance of payments.

ACCESS:  http://www.justice-uk.human-rights.org/ (For an important message at this Community-on-Line web-site) & thereafter,
Access also http://www.law.society.complaints.and.human-rights.org/ (Judge instigates Fraud On Tax Payers - he knows not the difference between 'imposed' & 'no undue influence'). APOLOGIES FOR THE DISAPPEARANCE OF THIS WEBSITE.It appears that the beneficiary of the work, both for applications to the courts in the United Kingdom and the submissions to the European Court for Human Rights* [*Link from here to the Statement of Facts submitted to the ECoHR], arranged with the providers of the free web space to erase the Intellectual Property of Andrew Yiannides, the founder of the human-rights Community-on-Line, without any reference to the creator of the website and owner of the Intellectual Property!
鼯font> Copyright subsists on all material in our web-site, owned by the authors of same.
Visitors can refer to these pages in any non commercial activity, so long as attribution is given as to source. License to use, for commercial or other specific use of the material, shall have been secured in writing first, from the owners of any property and material from these pages. No material shall be reproduced in any form and by any means without prior agreement and or license in writing from the copyright owners. The Press are invited to contact us if they wish to publish material in the Public Interest, As We Do.
For any problems or questions regarding this web-site contact:  webmaster
...