h-rtitle.gif (7604 bytes)

Crime - Organised - Institutionalised - Corruption - Fraud - Protection Rackets, run and managed by judicial chair occupants, in a free-for-all state of abundance. Note below the arrangements between the administrative, the judiciary and the media; read of the all-embracing guarantee in place, in contempt of all law : the root shall be pointed to.

WHERE IS JUSTICE? Read below:-

"The court has inherent jurisdiction to stay an action which must fail; as, for instance an action brought in respect of an act of State"

*Link from here to founder's tribulations in 1972-75 and marvel at the creativity of allegedly honourable officers of Justice and the Law in the mother of all PSEUDOdemocracies

  • And by extension any act of any public servant who is appointed, retained and maintained by other public servants for all of whom, the state, as employer, is ultimately responsible, including abusers of judicial chair occupancy. Hence, the billions paid out as covered in the affidavit which visitors can link to directly from here [*Link].
  • Link also from here to the founder's conclusions as of 1972-75 when the great Metropolitan police were seen to be nothing but accessories to and abettors of the rampant fraud and corruption through the courts organised and processed to fruition while Members of Parliament were -as they still do- promoting the waffle that amounts to nothing short of:-

'independence of the judiciary to act in contempt of ALL LAW (national and international) in a pseudo-democracy.

*Link from here to proof of the parts the police play in promotion and expansion of the criminal activities instigated, processed and imposed on society by the legal circles. Read of assertions by a typical hypocrite, none other than the Commissioner of the Metropolitan Police, Sir Robert Mark QPM, when he spoke of FALSE RECORDS / FORGERIES by the legal circles while delivering his famous Dimbleby Lecture on BBC-TV in November 1973, 15 months after he received true copy of THE FORGERY advanced and promoted by the licensed criminals : solicitors and barristers for their evil ends in the case that opened Andrew Yiannides' mental eyes to the realities of life in the United Kingdom, a typical PSEUDOdemocracy. Can anyone enlighten Andrew and the millions of victims of the legal circles WHY NO PROSECUTION of the solicitors & the barristers in 1972 or thereafter?.

  • With such a facility in place (the words we point to above) and arrogant abuse of public office, can anyone assert, or argue, that Mr Andrew Yiannides, the founder of human-rights, was not right to determine that Justice has been abducted and that she is held captive in the dungeons maintained by her abductors who rape her daily in their courts? (>Hence the c reation of www.jusaticeraped.org <)
  • ALL Member States of the European Union are subject to the ruling which visitors, readers and researchers can access in the explicit page /yourrights.htm

*Link from here to the realities - in due course also a link to the warning (indirect but nonetheless very clear) for thinkers to recognise 

  • On 3rd March 2008 >someone's birthday< we released a House of Lords PRECEDENT CASE and reveal deliberations by their Lordships in respect of FRAUD - DECEPTION - CONSPIRACY & IMPLIED LIES BY KEEPING SILENT about any wrong imposed on any other.
  • >>> IN THE MEANTIME we have been naming and shaming a number who know of and engage in much more than just approve wrongs imposed on Mr & Mrs Average, the millions of taxpayers, in our allegedly civilised country / state / province / district of the European Union created by politicians, without reference to the taxed for fraud sucker-serfs, allegedly for the benefit of the citizens from FRAUD & CORRUPTION, among other promotions.

Needless to say the case entailed activities and practices by solicitors as Mr Andrew Yiannides was subjected to, decades later, by an old school friend, Mr Kypros Nichola of Nicholas & Co. in London. Mr K. Nichola bluntly abused the trust placed in him and indulged, in tandem with others, in criminal activities intended to cause the damages that were imposed on the targeted 'serf' by accredited - by the Law Society & Bar Council - allegedly Honourable Officers of the Supreme Court, the courts maintained by successive elected governments in the United Kingdom, one of many pseudodemocracies. In due course another revelation relevant to the arrogant 'inherent jurisdiction', through which to deny, obstruct justice & impose all manner of criminally created states on 'the serfs', who are taxed for the cost of maintaining criminals in public office, in pseudo-democracies.

RESPONSIBLE FOR THE STATE OF AFFAIRS, successive irresponsible Lord Chancellors and Home Secretaries who ignored and ignore all complaints and submissions by victims of the organised crimes we point to and expose in our pages, irrespective of the evidence and the law pointed to, by the victims of it all, the citizens who are called upon to pay taxes for the maintenance of criminals in public office.

[*Link from here to our exclusive page, covering confidential fraud as arranged THROUGH THE BEST KEPT OPEN SECRET in alleged democracies, European States. Elsewhere the foundations and corner stone upon which the operatives built the societies of their making using the bricks and mortar we cover in this and other pages. The visitor should not be under any illusion that the stars in the theatrical productions, covered in our pages were by any stretch of the imagination 'humans' who were / are gifted with any attributes that distinguish 'true humans' (>thinkers<) from animals.

Fraud in court  Council staff use Forgeries   Misconduct in Public Office. 2 cases relative to applicable law One Protocol says it ALL It betrays arrogant intentions Law Provides for THEFTS and it covers Judges too Judges' duties   TIME 4 CHANGE   & CHALLENGES Site CONTENTS - Table of Contents & ongoing work Your Rights & OBLIGATIONS to Society SITE SEARCH facility for any specific element / issue of concern to visitors / readers
COURTS : their Facilities Abused For ORGANISED CRIME : FRAUD Solicitor's Perjury & Victim Ignores it all Just like the Law Society always does Blackmailed or is it Just Conditioned & Subjugated Victims who join the club ? We name Lovers of blunt fraud through courts - Users of the facilities 4 illicit gains Local Authorities & FRAUD on 'serfs' the Taxpayers who are kept in the dark Police Party to & Endorsing Criminal Acts, Activities Arrogant Fraud FALSE Records & Contempt of Law by the legal Circles & Public Services The crafty ones & Vexatious Litigant PLOYS for the rewarded silent

* Information FOR victims who wish to co-operate by EXPOSING & CHALLENGING abusers of Public Office *

family.uk-human-rights justiceraped.org dssfraud.htm confraud.htm dadscare.htm contract.htm converts.htm MensAid
solicitorsfromhell.co.uk chancellor.htm theyknow.htm solfraud.htm sheknows.htm 4deceit.htm convicti.htm forward.htm


*Link from here to evidence. *Link also from here to a case when the abusers of the courts' facilities abandoned their plans for another targeted family

IMPORTANT INFORMATION for all victims of malpractice - misconduct - negligence, etc. TO NOTE

In the civil justice system in England and Wales, a judge presides over the proceedings that are argued by the opposing sides through the adversarial process. The process enables the court, judge, to reach a conclusion as to the truth of the facts in dispute. Thereat it is for the judge to apply the law to the facts proven, established at court.

The system as evolved is covered in the page 'English Legal System' and remains the same after the Woolf reforms.

An explicit Affidavit [*L] plus exhibits and
     letters to a Chief Inspector of Police
          one to solicitors
[*L] and another to the Lord Chancellor [*L] evince
               ORGANISED CRIMES
(Access and read the letter to the police in September 2006 [*L])

Access & read from one of a number of letters to the Prime Minister : * I believe that New Labour will deliver us from the wrongs we have been suffering for far too long. Use of our resources in terms of human potential and capabilities can and should be channelled through rights not wrongs, through positives not through negatives. It is our produce and ingenuity we can sell to others not the minefields of corrupt and bankrupt public services. * [*Link from here to the page, note the steps taken to ensure the Prime Minister forwarded / delegated submissions and evidence received at 10 Downing Street to the right Minister / Ministry because the submissions were in respect of ORGANISED CRIMES

3rd March 2011 added link [*L] to the BBC-TV Dimbleby Lecture in 1973 as the Metropolitan Police Commissioner, Sir Robert Mark prepared & presented to the sucker-serfs


In October 2010 the coalition (Con-Lib-Dems) Government's Attorney General, the Rt. Hon. Dominic Grieve QC, in an interview to 'COUNSEL'* [*L] qualified that his priority was to address the issue of 'the police distancing themselves -systematically we add- in cases of fraud and directing the victims -who report such matters to the police, as the law commands- to instruct solicitors. The government (the A.G, naturally) also the media are invited to access the Dimbleby Lecture (BBC-TV November 1973) as delivered by Sir Robert Mark QPM [*L] and the page where we point to the fact -and the evidence- that TWO Lord Justices sitting at the Court of Appeal, indulged, in usual manner : in blunt and arrogant contempt for the law [*L] when addressing issues of the very nature the Metropolitan Police Commissioner himself ALSO INDULGED in over a year before the famous lecture; yet he had the audacity to refer to criminal activities, by the legal circles, such as he alluded to in the course of his Television Lecture which he delivered on TV for the sucker-serfs to ponder upon, as his contribution towards the 'dust in your eyes sheeple' services. From here link [*L] also to the case when the police created their own false records as their contribution towards the creation of false states intended to obstruct / block Andrew Yiannides from securing employment in an area he could have been contributing positively towards the creation of considerate humans / thinkers, as the material facts, including letters, published at the website evince. 

courts.htm     KEY
CHANGES 20 Nov. 2005

Courts & Court Service *Page first published February 1997*

import.gif (1348 bytes)
HELP US TO HELP YOU Please [*Link to plea].

hrbnrsml.gif (1162 bytes) JOIN
others on Line and publish your Statement of Facts, also the Evidence you have. Use your rights in law and ACT with other victims against the offenders. It is in the victims'  interest to work with one another for successes through the evidence all can share. Victims can benefit from the use of pooled data that establishes the common practices, as in the case of the member whose case  Mr Yiannides submitted to the European Court of Human Rights. In our pages we have published the STATED FACTS and the VIOLATIONS pleaded for you to access the details of in order to NOTE the VERY COMMON practices at and in our courts. [*Link to page]

Affiliated Sites
For DATA Collection :


ACCESS the petition to the ECoHR as registered in June 2002. Access THE FACTS stated & the VIOLATIONS pleaded. Compare the facts stated with your own experiences. Click on either link (above), for connection to the application, then scroll up / down for the rest of the submissions. If you are publishing anything and wish to link to the pages contact us or the member. Information for bookmarks, to link to, will be furnished and bookmarks to any part can be introduced for connection to from your site. WE will try to meet the requirements of all who seek unadulterated & unblemished 'Justice'.You are also invited to work with and   co-operate with the members of the Community. together we shall unshackle Justice and release her from the dungeons of the RCJ. If you copy any material, ensure that you credit and qualify the source of the intellectual property.

ACCESS the member's site for additional information and how solicitors and courts did act in contempt of the LAW. Find out how judicial chair occupants acted in contempt of the documented evidence, thereby furnishing additional proof and evidence as to the priorities of the controllers of CIUKU Enterprises. Read of the capabilities of a slit personality - a judge of two minds, an illiterate in English and in Law, serving the rampant Fraud & Corruption that abounds in our country.

Join in the creation of the mass of evidence against the offending public servants. It will support actions you and others can instigate jointly and or severally. We cover In our pages such rights, & the laws breached and violated by the state through the public servants who defraud citizens of their rights in law and their assets / properties. Access the relevant page and consider our invitation and your rights.
READ the content of this page very carefully and recognise how each of the protagonists was after self-promotion while at the same time agreeing over what was to come from within their circles, as a mob organised at deceit with undeclared intentions and 'stitch you up, behind your back mate', as fast learners care of the facilities we cover in the exclusive and clearly stated page: * /confraud.htm *
KEY to Page & Site
3. Page VENUES / Events
4. Supr. Court Rules SCANS
5. Fraudulently Imposed Costs
6. Relevant Case Law - List
7. Freedom of INFORMATION
8. VICTIMS - A Short - LIST

1. Lord Chancellor    
2. Transcribers FRAUD FOR
3. Two Lord Justices Pervert
4. part 4

Page VENUES / Events List
1.  Court of Appeal 
2.  CoA Downing Street Case
3.  part 3.
4.  part 4

Some Site ISSUES List
1. Judges Independent of Law
2. Court officers ignore law!
3. Contempt for true records
4. Irresponsible Department
5. Illiterates in Department
6. Public Servants Obstruct
7. Law & Rules Provide
8. A Motto For ALL To Adopt
9. Greed - Corruption - Fraud
11. False Instruments-Orders
13. Judicial Independence.
14. Publishing The Facts
15. Public to help part 15
14. part 14

Victims Pages List
1.  Bank Fraud Victim I.  
2.  Bank Fraud Victim II.  
3.  Bank Fraud Victim III  
4.  Bank Fraud Victim IV. 
5.  Bank Fraud Victim V  
6.  Divorce Victim  One.  
7.  Divorce Victim Two.  
8.  Divorce Victim Three.  
9.  Divorce Victim Four.  
10. Divorce Victim Five.
11. Divorce Victim Six.
11a. Divorce Victim Seven
12. Police Victim One 
13. Police Victim Two
14. Police Victim Three  
15. Police Victim Four.
16. Court Victim One 
17. Court Victim Two  
18. Court Victim Three  
19. Court Victim Four 
20. Court Victim Five 
21. Court Victim Six
22. xxxxx

Page CHANGES - List
1. Links & Commentary
2. CoA endorse FORGERY
3. Additional Scan Images 
4. R.S.C Rules Scans-List 
5. Intro CoA Serve Fraud  
6. Relevant Legal Case Law
7. Link from Pages List- NEW
8. Evidence added to page.
part 9

SCANS - Supreme Court
1.  Part of rule 18/8/4         
2.  Part of rule 18/9     
3.  Part of rule 18/12/11  
4. The RSV cover Vol. 1 
5.  Link To Blunt FORGERY
6. Letter from Court Service
7. <> 7

ADDITIONAL -  Evidence
1. Page from Transcript 
3. Fraudster TRAPPED 
4. part 4
part 5

The 'RSC bible' - 1973 edition bought after a solicitor advanced and promoted a FORGERY procured by his client's adversaries. He eagerly promoted the forgery, to his client, as a valid document that allegedly 'supported a defence the other side settled and served in a case of fraud/misrepresentation.

rsccovf.jpg (36539 bytes)
we point to important elements that are clarified in the rules 'the professionals are meant to adhere to. 

rscfrinf.jpg (122886 bytes)
It covers FRAUD
>pleading fraud<

rscpfraf.jpg (64874 bytes)
It covers the duty of Counsel to court & client by extension and never mind the arrangements between the legal circles. Their victims can plead issues of Reliance on one another AND on public servants to or who misconduct in public office & include the offenders as defendants. NO ONE IS ABOVE THE LAW..... period.

rscpfatf.jpg (22540 bytes)
This little gem makes it clear that a matter arising AFTER THE issue of the writ CAN BE PLEADED by the parties to an action during the instigated and ongoing proceedings.


1 .Page from a Transcript  
3. Non Existent Material     
RELEVANT Case Law- List
1. Need for Interrogatories
2. When Time/Date Immaterial
3. Fraud Vitiates Judgements
4. Public Office Misconduct
5. False Instruments & THEFT
6. part

2006 Action taken in respect of abuse of the courts' facilities & the ORGANISED DESTRUCTION of  Families with intent
2006sum1.jpg (317597 bytes)

2006sum2_small.jpg (7213 bytes)

2006sum3.jpg (340153 bytes)


ISSUED - SEALED by the court staff & SERVED by victim Mr Gary Westcar a victim of the family courts in the U.K

We invite victims of the divorce industry & the courts, the legal circles in general, to contact us AFTER READING the issues we point to below:

Article 6 of the ECoHR provides: - "In the determination of his CIVIL RIGHTS & OBLIGATIONS or of any criminal charge against him, everyone is entitled to a fair and PUBLIC HEARING within reasonable time by an INDEPENDENT  and IMPARTIAL tribunal established by law".

We underlined the word OBLIGATIONS which all fraudsters club recruits elected to ignore yet, they are all running around offering legal services - ASSISTANCE TO OTHER MORONS, playing along with the criminals who are in control of the courts and the legal system. Their only interest and target the undeclared cash under the table on submission of petitions to the European Court of Human Rights for cases which they full well know to have been subject to fraudulently engineered proceedings intended to lead to the rewards under the table as we cover in our exclusive page. We refer to the page which ALL elected to ignore along with the media barons and the Intellectual Prostitutes retained and maintained by the media barons

undercon.gif (286 bytes) Page Revised: August 27, 2012 - ADDED :  Links to and from other pages & documented evidence

Site reconstruction with ongoing editorial changes, new material and pages with links to from other pages / sites 

Guidelines on Navigating through the extensive material: access instructions.
As part of the reconstruction process our new pages and pages where changes and additions have been implemented, the improved / amended pages are endorsed with the link 'Page Changes and the date of the last changes. The link takes visitors to a List of the changes implemented in the page. These include new material and links from relevant paragraphs to other or new relevant material in other pages. For further clarification email: webmaster@


HOW & WHAT FOR the courts and legal services are used in the United Kingdom >as in other PSEUDOdemocracies


WE propose to publish documents as posted by and received from Courts. It will be for the public and the world at large (as unbiased jurors) to determine and marvel at the capabilities and the PRACTICES that somehow repetitiously and systematically the public, in the United Kingdom, is subjected to. It is ALL done for and in the interests of the legal professions. (*See footnote) The citizens -treated as 'serfs' or subjects to the whims of the corrupt and the corrupted- have no rights to protection under any law. And thus the corrupters just march on unhindred as the corrupted join the corrupters for expansion & entrenchment of the New Wolrd Order.


The most common practice - Court ORDERS - arising out of non-events & not in accordance with rules of procedure. *Link from here [*L] to such practices, also to a challenge when a county court judge (D.J) was indulging in contempt of the law and the rules [*L] of procedure : contempt for 'due process' as provided / stipulated in international law : ECHR). In the first example / link *Orders POSTED LATE, also, in order to misdirect actions and cases into the biggest fraud ongoing, in our courts, that of appeal THROUGH LEAVE TO APPEAL, as the late postings created / 'opened that route'.


We point, in the concluding words above, to the created need for 'Leave to Appeal', ploy, 'you are late'.


The above route is the most abused for perverting justice, as court cases are treated, by the criminals who  plan and are in control of it all.


A common abuse of the rules of procedure leading to many a naive, and, illiterate in Court practice, citizens falling victim to the costs for 'leave to appeal' PLOYS from 'judicial' [Note: 'NOT judicious' : *Link* [*L] to definition] orders' that rest and are founded on abuse of office and court facilities, as the case you were / can link to from the second bulleted paragraph, above.


The rules applicable to the 'leave to appeal' rouse are in no way part of any act of Parliament. Just another 'facility' put in place by the abusers of the legal system / the court service. The 'convenient facility' simply justifies the conclusion that the intention was and has always been 'fraud' because of the element that is introduced, used and relied upon by the abusers of the courts' facilities.


Leave to appeal leads to : "NOTHING TO DO WITH THE MERITS OF THE CASE ITSELF'. Inexcusable and unjustified waffle, by the administrators of Justice and the courts service, consequential to constructively engineered fraud on Mr & Mrs Average. And, Members of Parliament, simply ignoring it all, as illiterates in law, not to mention elected members of parliament with a professional background 'in law'! [*Link from here to the words of a solicitor an extract from a letter to a client in March 2003].


PLEA: We need assistance, in order to secure access to the Old Master, the painting of the Biblical Scene that was used in the production of the TV programme we refer to, at the site you can link to from here.

THE COURT SERVICE staff, like automata, always respond to victims (who complain about the denial of fair treatment by the courts) with the usual 'Independence of the Judiciary', excuse [*Link from here to an interesting letter from an illiterate public servant] as if judges are also independent of the restrains of law in matters of honesty and deception. No provisions for any authority, not even the person (Minister) responsible FOR the judiciary, to oversee and investigate legitimate complaints arising out of the commonest of criminal activities that judicial chair occupants engage / partake in, and even instigate of their own. Simple and blatant violation of Article 13 of the European Convention of Human Rights, leading to, and often resting on other blatant violations of human rights because of and for the other ulterior motives of the Legal/Judicial/Police TRIAD that operate the free-for-all in the United Kingdom. All know of the fact that THERE EXISTS NO AUTHORITY TO SUPERVISE AND MONITOR the conduct of judicial chair occupants and IF JUDGES ACT within the reemit of their retainers, as public servants! Their undertakings under the Judicial Oath are very clear; yet in one bothers to check or follow up complaints on issues that clearly evince / suggest that THEIR PRESUMED KNOWLEDGE OF LAW IS APPLIED, at all, when dispensing with their public duties!

The lack of ADMINISTRATION (from above and from within the Justice Department / The Lord Chancellor and his office) simply created the free-for-all the legal circles thrive in and benefit from. Most certainly the situation has been so for decades, as Andrew, the founder of *human-rights*, recognised over 39 years ago. [*Link from here to the arrogant assurances from the judiciary to the politicians and to all other public servants TO  BE ABSOLVED OF ANY WRONGDOING one and all impose on the sucker-serfs who have taxes imposed on them for such 'amenities to the criminals in control of an allegedly civilised society, a PSEUDOdemocracy resting and founded on rampant fraud and the corruption of morons* [*L] such as we point to in our pages].

The situation may well have been so FOR CENTURIES because public servants, from within the Law Enforcement Agencies, default.to apply themselves to Parliament's Law [*F5]. References to the works of Charles Dickens, in our pages, ought not to be treated casually; he knew a thing or two, for in 'Bleak House' and 'The Pickwick Papers', for instance, he expressed clearly 'stated views / his observations'.

So did the creators of the New Testament also, for they put on record, in the Gospel according to St. Luke, one reads of 'the parctices of the Lawyers 2000 years ago, as practiced by the followers of the teachings by examples stated in the most vile of works ever to have been misrepresented to mankind. In conjunction with the aforesaid 'warnings', the words attributed to Jesus Christ according to the Gospel of St. John (one of the John's in any case) to the religious leaders of the Hebrews of His days J.C reocorded to have retorted : "You Are Of Your Father The Devil" >>> Neeed one wonder WHY the assaults on Christianity / Christians, as in the case of the teacher we point to [*L] care of Andrew Yiannides' assistance to the victim-teacher who was ignored and abandoned by one and all? WE invite readers / visitors to consider our closing words in respect of the role of 'the media' in an allegedly civilised..... PSEUDOdemocracy where suppression of the truth / the realities and contempt for ALL law rule supreme as we cover and expose in our pages. 

The C.o.A ruling in "The Downing Street Years - case" [*Link] exposed the sham of it all. It was but a typical example of what our Judiciary excel at. The income generating conditions for the circles from within which our Judges rose/rise to public office IS ALWAYS their first priority.

IT IS FOR THE PRESENT LORD CHANCELLOR to adhere to the promise made by the Labour Party, when in opposition, and to keep a register of bad judges: 'we refer to the issue of false instruments that lack accountability by the authors, the judges. It is and IT will be the responsibility of the present Government to ensure that legislation is introduced to ensure that TRUE UNBIASED AND UNTAINTED COURT PROCEEDINGS (in accordance with the provisions of Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights) ARE FULLY RECORDED. It costs less than TWO POUND STERLING to use a 4 hour video tape at extended play speed (8 hours) to secure TRUE RECORDS of what goes on inside the theatres of our Judicial halls.




NO RECORDINGS !!!! [*Link from here to a transcript when the Court of Appeal allowed Mr Norman Scarth to record, *Link also from here to suppression of it by the arrogant abuser of trust, Mr Norman Scarth, who set up business with his LIPS chums & their affiliates, as fraudsters club recruits]


WHY, IF everything is within the law and as the law provides?


Why the protection racket? (For the answer all taxpayers MUST visit the page where we cover and expose the organised fraud through the legal circles with blunt participation by the courts' staff and officers -judicial chair occupants)


WHO want to protect whom from exposure? [*Link from here  to dreamers and lovers of the rampant fraud THROUGH THE COURTS]


WHY tamper with tape recordings by cutting and splicing, editing parts of the truth out? [*Link from here to proof]

WHY generate, with intent, unnecessary volumes of paperwork (third parties benefiting for transcripts 'to be approved by the directors of all fraud and corruption at and through the courts) IN THIS DAY AND AGE of ELECTRONIC wonders?  WHY NOT TRUE uncut and UNEDITED VIDEO RECORDINGS for ALL Court hearings and proceedings in our Courts ???  [*Link from here to a House of Lords Precedent case, dating back to 1939-40 and consider the elements their Lordships applied themselves to and deliberated upon].

Your Lordship, and the Right Honourable Members of Parliament DO NOTE this simple principle: Justice should be seen to be WORKING for and in the service of the people NOT the legal circles. Cut waste and fraud in the legal system at a stroke, no dilly dallying. We point you all to the most offensive of criminal activities at and through the courts. Many the charlatans and stooges who are drawn into the corrupt world of the lawyers, operating as lovers of the facilities in place for Rampant Fraud on the budget and the Corruption of morons, who go for it although fully aware of the fact that what they go for and engage in, is FRAUD on the taxpayers, on Mr & Mrs Average. (*F1).

RECORDINGS ON DEMAND your Lordship. (*F3 a most important Footnote)  



*Link from here to a video clip when Sen. Jay Rokefeller spoke of the Internet not being part of the plans.... 

    YOUR VIEWS on the subject matter are welcome.  How about a petition for legislation to VIDEO record all Court Proceedings with automatic right to copies for the parties as with the police audio recordings that Parliament provided for, under The Police And Criminal Evidence Act 1984?
    WHY DISCRIMINATE against the police?


Why assume / treat the legal boffins / circles as infallible individuals, who are presumed not to be subject to the very temptations the police now are meant to be investigating* in such high places?

*Link from here to Sir Robert Mark's, the Metropolitan Police Commissioner's >Dimbleby Lecture in 1973< as prepared and delivered by him on BBCV-TV
Refer to *Link from here to the front page headlines of the Daily Mail on 30th July 1998 and to Paul Johnson's essay in November 1998*
*Link from here also to an explicit article in the London Evening Standard, in September 1999*


WE DID SAY *meant to be investigating*, back in 1998 when we added the above 'more dust in your eyes, long suffering public'. The obliging media barons always ready, willing and able to promote the vile schemes of the controllers of CIUKU Enterprises, as with the present 'stirring up' of racial disharmony because of the refugees and asylum seekers, the states created by the fraudsters who follow the teachings by examples stated in the most vile of works ever to have been misrepresented -with fraudulent intentions- to mankind, by its creators, their successors and by the many who sought power as Magalomaniacs and impostors, over the centuries / millennia since the concocted rubbish by seasoned criminals was delivered to Ptolemy of Egypt under specific cicumstances humans have been deprived knowledge of 'the truth', care of the plans of the criminals who created and the leaders of the followers of the concocted vile creation, the Old Testament*

*Link from here to an extract, the most clear of hints from the vile work, for thinkers to consider


Government 'incompetence?




Convenient that through defaults and omissions the media barons always produce half baked potatoes.
FACT: On 13 December, 2002, the Crime Editor of 'The Sun' reported his views*  Odd that he discovered pantomimes in the courts BY AND FOR THE CRIMINALS who are in control of YOUR RIGHTS IN LAW Mr & Mrs Average Sheeple.

*Link from here to the page we created around the editor's promotions

*Link from here to a page where we point to some of the rights assured -allegedly- in International Law. We wrote to the Crime Editor of 'The Sun' first by email and two weeks later by FAX .... but ....NO RESPONSE, from Intellectual Prostitutes, who indulge in typical ostrich acts.... sold to the system / or captive of it.... serving other interests and the plans of fraudsters for the sons(!) of men(!).


The dust or smoke screen had served its purpose, as far as the author of the article and the editor of 'The Sun' were concerned. Both had served the puppeteers objectives 'FOOL the sucker serfs with anything you can, that is what you are here for'


No need for the public to know of the realities and the DESTRUCTION OF FAMILIES AT WILL as we cover in our pages, by the manipulative* and the criminals**  ( [*L] who are in control in an alleged Democracy; an allegedly civilised society resting and founded, allegedly on principles of Law & Order. [*Link [**L] to another page / case history example].

*Link from here to the page where we cover aspects of the solicitors activities in organised fraud as in the case of the FORGERY we point to in this page


The condescending accessories and promoters of CIUKU Enterprise, from within the media, always ready  to serve any half baked potatoes to the citizens they are meant to be informing with THE FACTS, in an allegedly civilised democracy. Acting as the puppets who dangle on the strings of the puppeteers, serving the the false states promoting the imposed pseudo-democracies is but their main pre-occupation, however.


ACCESS the events we reported to the government in March 2002* [*L]. Ensure that you DO READ the facts covered in the page we link you to. Bear in mind that the actress who had been engaging in the scenarios we covered, was married to a police officer and that she was an accessory to constructive frauds through the usual scams and theatrical productions in the courts*. [Access [*L] in another page and read parts of the affidavit which the lousy actress never reported to the authorities or challenged at court. Thereby she betrayed her parts and overriding role in the blunt & arrogant constructive frauds on the taxpayers : Mr & Mrs Average]. Note the facts reported / stated in both pages and then consider what was reported in 'The Sun' on 7th March 2002* [*L], the day after the actress received a very clear fax* [*L], about her parts in the blunt & arrogant constructive frauds at and through the courts created / enacted.


Who but the senior officer retained, instructed and meant to be investigating the 'untouchables' came up with the utterances which 'The Sun' was praising him for?


The senior officer DID NOT come up with anything leading to prosecutions of any of the criminals who are in control of the courts and the court services. Yet he was presented as a courageous and brave hero, by 'The Sun'!


He accepted a knighthood and took over from the departing Commissioner of the Metropolitan Police, Sir Paul Condon,  who received plenty of communications about the FORGERIES that were used to misappropriate and steal HOUSING BENEFIT funds belonging to others, as organised by the staff and officers at Haringey Council and Enfield Council in North London, also at Hackney Council in East London. All and everything with the blessings of the Metropolitan Police, all the way to the Office of the Commissioner and blunt participation in the scams by the staff and officers within the Local Authorities the Local County Courts. [*Link from here to the page where we released the Appeal that caused the government to announce the Bill of Rights while the many charlatans and stooges who contacted us (allegedly because they wished to challenge and expose the rampant fraud ongoing in and imposed through abuse of the courts facilities) shoved their heads in the sand or congregate in the caves where they hatched and hatch up their plans HOW TO OBSTRUCT & CONSPIRE(D) TO DISCREDIT ANY GENUINE CHALLENGERS and how best to secure ongoing fraudulent gains from the processes they fell in love with, and signed up to, as fraudsters-club-recruits / maintenance engineers of the system of operations].


THEFTS and CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUDS ORGANISED  BY THE STAFF & OFFICERS OF THE LOCAL AUTHORITY that was meeting and meets the salaries of police officers who do not serve the victims of crime but through defaults and omissions they ensure the criminals flourish and multiply. [*Link].


NOTE OUR FAIR COMMENTS and read the evidence that we point you to. DO NOT FAIL to access the above link/page and IF you really wish to know of the facts of life, as organised for the citizens by the controllers of CIUKU Enterprises, access the site where the mother of the young lady (to whom we dedicated this web-site) publishes which parties and who responsible for what in that tragic scenario. DO NOT FAIL TO NOTE THAT THE CRIMINAL WAS SERVED by the criminals in control of the police, the Coroners' office and the Magistrates Courts staff and officers. [*Link]


WE PUBLISH in our pages information on developments which THE CITIZENS / VICTIMS can use when challenging the offenders who breach the law and violate the citizens rights through abuse of office and blunt misconduct in / at Court. More often than not the citizens are unaided because 'the organisers of the system' SO ARRANGE and HAVE CREATED FOR THEIR victims [*Link to list, of some].


A typical case / scenario can be accessed in our pages [*Link directly to page]. The victims of banking fraud, Harry & Carole Roffey are preparing their own pages and web-site; just another example of the rampant fraud and corruption which, if not instigated at and by the courts, nonetheless approved and endorsed by ALL PUBLIC SERVANTS. Public Servants, who are in fact retained to serve the citizens and to protect them from crime  and criminals, in fact ENDORSE AND PROMOTE THE ACTIVITIES AS PERFECTLY NORMAL. The VICTIMS / CITIZENS WERE SUBJECTED TO BLUNT CRIMINAL ACTS, and within the public servants' own code of morals and their knowledge of 'the law' such activities were/are normal and acceptable. [*Link to an exclusive page where we challenge the content of a judgement (transcript) by way of a SKELETON ARGUMENT as settled by Mr. Andrew Yiannides the founder of human-rights (NGO) for and on behalf of victims of FRAUDULENT IMPOSITIONS BY BANK STAFF & OFFICERS].


Among the promoters, persons who operate from within the COURTS IN JUDICIAL CAPACITIES. Persons from within the Law Enforcement Agencies acting in contempt of the evidence and the law and recklessly breach their public duties.


Read the skeleton argument, attached to an appeal. Victims who do read it, should recognise 'the usual scenarios and scripts from the legal circles' and above all, the defaults by judicial chair occupants who abuse and misconduct in public office.


Of such material and 'facts of life within an allegedly civilised society / state, that allegedly   which we settled and published covering precisely the arrangements by the criminals who are in control of the citizens' rights in law.  The CAP's  (Citizens Alternative Precedents, proposed by our founder in 1981 through The CAMILA Project,* are well intended. ALL VICTIMS Of the TRIAD, SHOULD and MUST participate in a true DEMOCRATIC SPIRIT). The state, through Parliament should also recognise the need for changes. IT MUST DO its best to assist us in our efforts to bring about TRUE, UNHINDERED, UNADULTERATED, UNBIASED and UNBLEMISHED JUSTICE in the United Kingdom. The MEDIA should cease shoving the facts and the attached evidence in the family closet and stop promoting the plans hatched up in secret sessions with the self appointed dictators, whose greed and pseudo-interest in mankind the editors and their subordinates turn a blind eye to, just as they stay as blind, as deaf and as dumb as the persons who were responsible for the issues that caused the Daily Mirror to come up with such views on 22 May 1992.

THE MOTTO for all from within should be:-
"Preach not to others, simply PRACTICE WHAT YOU PREACH"

*Link from here to an explicit quote by the French Jurist Charles Louis Montesquieu

*    The Law and rules of court, in any CIVILISED SOCIETY / STATE provide FOR THE PROTECTION OF society as a whole, just as for the individual citizen.

*Link from here to explicit rules of court provisions

*   In that instance the offending solicitor and the band of renegades from the law, the solicitor was co-operating with, happened to be an old school chum of the victim of fraud - the Plaintiff. One could not get a more real 'Bleak House' situation than Charles Dickens' 'literary work'.

*Link from here to our exclusive page where we point to realities and realisations born of studies and research the victim of fraud engaged in, as of a young age. Read the specific material -article from the UK Hellenic 'The News' weekly- and note >in the smae page< the alternative caption to the cartoon as suggested by Andrew Yiannides to the editor of the 'Daily Mail', some years before the article in 'The News' exposed the solicitor Kypros Nichola, the victim's old school friend and solicitor >to have been / be a Freemason<. The solicitor, as member of the Brotherhood with secretive plans for mankind, did expose himself to have been a proactive criminal as of the moment he set about promoting the >blunt FORGERY we publish in this page< as acceptable evidence in support of a concocted Defence in the matter of the commercial fraud. The solicitor's connection to the Brotherhood simply confirmed the obvious to anyone who gets to know of the fact that the Brotherhood relates to and is most proactive in promoting and using the old testament as intended by the creators, their successors, by the indoctrinated and the conditioned followers of the vile scenarios born of and attached to the old testament rubbish; the rubbish promoted as alleged holy scriptures for some 2300 years. The Brotherhood also busy promoting itself as holder  / keeper of alleged 'secret Gnosis'. Intriguiging indeed, the connection of 'the Brotherhood equipped with secrets', and gnosis attached to the 'scripts and scenarios of the old testament', which the victim of the commercial fraud, discarded as of his pre-teen years as vile, after determining the alleged holy scriptures were nothing but the creations of evil minds, by criminals who set about promoting their creations with fraudulent intentions.  

*   The practices by the legal circles led Mr. Andrew Yiannides to coin:- "The self-perpetuating cancerous growth industry"©. One has only to consider the routine directions offered to the citizens, pardon 'the serfs', by their representatives in government: "See a solicitor". Such advise from within an alleged Christian state and nation where the sovereign happens, also, to be 'the protector of the faith', a direct hint to the rivers of blood !

*Link from here to rights assured

*Link from here to principles of law in true Democratic States

*Link from here to the words of Oliver Cromwell, George Washington & Thomas Jefferson

*   No one should benefit at the expense of any other 'without due process of AND STRICT ADHERENCE TO THE LAW, administered by (presumed and or assumed) experts / honourable individuals.

*Link from here to an appeal when Pleading the 'assured rights for due process' & when 'appropriate' challenges to the staff in the Lord Chancellor's office caused the abusers of the courts facilities to review, of their own, that which they had indulged in, in contempt of the law and rules of court. Visitors are urged to read the whole of the appeal document, in order to familiarise themselves with the extent of the abuse of public office and the reckless denials or rights BY judicial chair occupants in that instance

In the HomePage the founder's conclusions, in 1975, consequential to 6 years of frustration because of the rampant free for all in the legal system, as operated by the legal circles. From solicitors, through the barristers 'via the independent, of the law, judicial chair occupants and 'the police part and parcel of the Organised Crimes Against 'the serfs'.

*Link from here to the founder's conclusions in the Home Page
*Link also from here to the evidence in the left panel / window in this page

*   Developments & activities by and from within the legal circles, the courts and the police maintained by the state, led to the conclusions : 'The rule of law non-existent' as Charles Louis Montesquieu determined centuries ago. One needs to consider carefully what his words implied, however.

*Link from here to our QUOTES page and read his conclusions

   "CIUKU Enterprises" was born as a result of the realisation of how, why and what for, one of the best, if not the best, legal system in the world is used by the criminals in control of the citizens' rights and lives in a pseudo-democracy where the media barons and the Intellectual Prostitutes they retain and maintain simply SUPPRESS THE TRUTH OF ANY MATTER their masters or the secret orders / brotherhoods they join so instruct them to do.

*Link from here to an element from material that was first published in 1902 in Russia and has long since been argued to have been a false instrument by the alleged circles to which the creation of such evil ploys was attributed by the promoter.

Advise from the Blind, the Deaf & the Dumb who choose to ignore, that which their constituents take / refer to them. For almost 2000 years the words of The Great Teacher ignored and the reasons behind it all, the very issues that Oliver Cromwell accused 'the deputies of the people' of: - 'greed and corruption'.

>PRECISELY what the legal circles, the police serve and promote trhough their actions and convenient defasults at all material times relying on abusers of judicial chair occupation to endorse the criminal activities AS HAPPENED when the two LJs Orr and Buckley entertained the criminals activities of the solicitors and the barristers acting for both teams in the case Yiannides -v- Radley Gowns Ltd.

An illiterate from within the Lord Chancellor's Department, in 1995,
exposed institutionalised attitudes towards 'the serfs', the taxpayers.

  • The letter, on the right, establishes the simple fact that judicial chair occupants indulge in contempt of the law they were / are retained to serve and uphold
  • The author of the letter, as a trained promoter of the usual waffle, simply acted as all Public Servants(?) are instructed in & used for... 'to promote the freedom of judicial chair occupants to act in contempt of all law and thus protect the criminals in control'.
  • Apparently THE MINISTER for Justice IS NOT, IN ANY WAY the SUPREMO & HEAD of the Justice System, the courts and the persons who are retained and appointed by his office to serve Justice, the Law and to protect / uphold the citizens at law, in general.
  • Evidently accountability for wrong doing is not part of 'the arrangements in place for the management of CIUKU Enterprises. [*Link to a brief legal argument that rests on relevant law. It applies in most, if not, all cases when judicial chair occupants act as the transcript and the FORGERY CREATED & USED in the case we point to above evinces]. 
lcdpiojr.jpg (27659 bytes)
The sucker-serfs who bothered to consider the realities pointed to in this page are hereby requested to READ THE ARROGANT DECLARATION by the judiciary, in the United Kingdom [*L] whereby they are free / let loose by parliament, in an allegedly civilised Democracy, TO DENY RIGHTS ASSURED IN LAW to the sucker-serfs, to the citizens who have taxes imposed on them for the maintenance of fraudsters and criminals in public office. Reference to the response from the Lord Chancellor's private office as the authoress of the letter released in the public doamain (image of which above) asserts simply confirms the reliance on one and all to rely on the blunt and asrrogant abuse of the courts facilities. ALL VISITORS / READERS SHOULD CONSIDER the arrogance of the Lord Chancellor who received a true copy of THE FORGERY PROCURED & PROMOTED BY THE LEGAL CIRCLES (image below) and thereat consider Andrew Yiannides' conclusions that the serfs / the sheeple of the United Kingdom are subjects to the whims of the corrupt, the corrupters and the corrupted as Andrew discovered care of the many who contactd him over the long span of 19 years and the many who atteched themslves to him as alleged victim-challengers whom we expose in explicit web-pages [*L].  

Below page from a transcript, exposes arrogance & contempt for the law.

  • The page, from a transcript, pertaining to a Court of Appeal hearing. TWO Lord Justices Orr & Buckley) entertaining an invitation to deny 'justice to a victim of FRAUD. (*F2)
  • Relying on waffle aplenty and the use of a Forgery (image below) in order to introduce FALSE INSTRUMENTS [*Link from here to clarification in law] THROUGH ABUSE OF JUDICIAL CHAIR OCCUPATION, and contempt for the law, FOR THEIR PART and arrogant complicity in perversion and blunt corruption of Justice.
  • Blunt contempt of the Law, as the legal circles organised for the occasion and as their training and established practices 'do evince' in myriad of cases up and down the country. [*Link to the images of the 1913 Forgery Act - click on image / page 4 & read the section relevant to courts]
  • The evil in control aiding, abetting and protecting one another as they climb the ladder of the CIUKU Enterprises, ranks of managerial 'echelons' of the protection racket, as maintained and promulgated by seasoned criminals.
  • All in the interest of  wealth creation through crime founded and resting on abuse of public office. READ the waffle from their Lordships as they chose to serve criminals and crime, care of the much revered Independence of the judiciary from the restraints of Parliament's Law. [*Link from here to the foundations for truly Democratic states and the rights assured to their citizens under national law & international treaties and accords]
  • Everyone who looked and looks at the document, below, can spot the altered date. But their Lordships ignored it all, including a contemporaneous letter where the original fraudster wrote to categorically state that such a document, as the one their Lordships  were looking at, did not exist, hence the issue of 'contemporaneous evidence' = AT THE TIME OF THE EVENTS, when the fraud was indulged into by the defendants.
  • Offering invisible services to CRIMINALS was & is the name of their game. As in other cases, the activities within the legal circles and the courts are systematically ignored by the police and Ministers.
  • Needless to say the Law Society & The Bar Council, as indifferent and unconcerned as the abusers of public office. All relying on judicial chair occupants to absolve them of all indiscretions and foul of the law activities. (*F4)

Page from the transcript
coap5ctf.jpg (121862 bytes)
Experts at & servants of the law acting in contempt of it, AS INVITED by the fraud of a barrister who submitted to court a concocted Defence in support of an open and shut case of Commercial FRAUD. The same fraudster also invited the court, through an affidavit he endorsed, to act in breach of their public duties, and in contempt of the law. Of such activities breaches of the Judicial Oath.

THE document below WAS the FORGERY referred to in the transcript above.

The document did not exist at the time of the events that gave rise to the institution of the High Court proceedings. THREE YEARS LATER it was procured /  created by the criminals who relied on the criminals in the Law Enforcement Agencies, the courts and the police to misconduct in public office.  PERVERTING JUSTICE is the game of such hardened criminals who benefit from practice certificates by the 'godfathers of all crime'. The promoter of the forgery / false instrument was deemed to be QC material and later he was rewarded OR benefited from an appointment to a judicial chair occupancy within the commercial division at, the RCJ,   naturally [*Link from here to our definition for RCJ and consider the above realities]. One only has to look at the date to NOTE THAT IT HAD A LITTLE COSMETIC ENHANCEMENT for improvement . Yet the experts at law who receive their fat salaries to deal with crime and criminals just ignored the provisions of the THEFT ACTS. Visitor if you have not read the introduction to this page, DO SO NOW.

forgeryr.jpg (67076 bytes)
With compliments to ALL of the fraudsters club recruits

Their Lordships, were holding the forgery above in their hands with their eyes (physical and mental) closed, apparently. Marvel at how blind the judiciary can choose to be when they serve crime & criminals and NOT the law as successive governments promote and assert with arrogant tongue in cheek mentality in the U.K. 

The copy of the letter below covers the jest of the commercial transaction

  • READ how the criminal / fraudster was cornered and trapped before proceedings were instituted.
  • The only way the fraudster could get out of the situation was to retain criminals who were well connected* [*Link] in order to benefit from the invisible services that are on offer at and through the courts by the managers of Crimes Incorporated United Kingdom Unlimited Enterprises.
chjad69r.jpg (54922 bytes)

The confirmation, below, is dated 5th February 1970.

The content very clear:

Dear Sir
   Further to your letter of 3rd February please be advised that style 3830/40/42/2397 was cancelled by our committee and agreed upon by Radley Gowns on October 10th.

Yours Faithfully

Miss Anne

cacanltr.jpg (48132 bytes)
IMPORTANT ELEMENT TO NOTE : - The style reference number was hand-written, as was the date when completing the spirtograph / stencil printed form, by the person who provided / procured the above document. The numbers 0 & 7 as used for the style reference number provided the additional evidence as to the FORGERY of the FALSE INSTRUMENT & only idiots or criminally motivated fraudsters could rely on the passing of  the DOUBLE FORGERY a s genuine. ONLY PERSONS WHO WERE PROVIDING INVISIBLE SERVICES TO CRIMINALS WERE RELIED UPON TO INDULGE IN THE USUAL MANNER, as the victim of all discovered after years of research and investigations as to the Legal & Court Services maintained in a pseudodemocracy.

The above letter qualifies also that C&A Modes operated through a protected system of commercial activities. Note the references to the fact that a committee and not a single person was responsible for purchase and order placing / processing, thus removing the element of corrupt(ed) agents abusing office and position.

  • Especially when checked against all other contemporaneous and documented evidence?
  • JUDGES OFFERING INVISIBLE SERVICES TO CRIMINALS for the creation of the society of their choice WAS / IS IN THE ORDER OF THE DAY. [*Link from here to a page where we apply our knowledge of historical realities, stated and covered in published material which NO ONE CAN IGNORE or carry on misrepresenting as the criminals who HAVE BEEN & ARE IN CONTROL have engaged in for far too long].
  • And the exclusive page we point to from here covers HOW THE SYSTEM HAS been operating through persons who, through abuse of public office, condition Mr. & Mrs. Average, 'the serfs', to endorse the rampant fraud through the abused courts' facilities, as covered in the page. [*Link from here to the page covering the facts of life in our allegedly civilised pseudo-democracy]
  • GREED and personal gain at the top of their agenda. [*Link to a page where one such person wrote of the parts such fraudsters engage in as alleged legal gurus, who operate in the courts in much the same manner as the solicitors].
  • The very elements the motivating forces for the multitude of stooges, charlatans and fraudsters club recruits who were sent along, as initiates, to play at and with craft-y elements they benefit from as the tutored, guided & USED bricks-n-mortar for the building (note the words) of societies that are organised and managed by the followers of the Great Architect, the alleged creator of all and everything.

The 'food for thought' news item, below, should awaken the naive & gullible

  • "A judge and a solicitor have been arrested by detectives investigating allegations of corruption in a number of courts".
  • The Department of Constitutional Affairs is called upon to authorise one of its Senior Officers to inform us and the press IF the Department is to carry on promoting the usual rubbish about judicial chair occupants not being 'subject to the restraints of law'.
The Headlines say it all.
judarrer.jpg (73844 bytes)
Readers & Researchers should access the legal argument founded and resting on provisions of the Theft Acts 1968 / 78

*The challenge to the authorities, with our compliments to the managers and organisers of the LIPS crowd / mob, the fraudsters club recruits who contacted Andrew soon after the explicit Appeal was lodged at Bow County Court in May 1992. Also to their like-minded affiliates and associates who operate out of similarly organised groups as alleged challengers of the ARROGANT FRAUD THROUGH THE COURTS IMPOSED ON THE TAXPAYERS, when nothing could be further from the truth]

Anyone around, police or Member of Parliament, still ready to promote the usual rubbish about judicial chair occupants 'not subject to the restraints of law' when indulging in criminal activities in the purported execution of their public duties?

*Link from here to the page where we point to and cover the overriding and undeclared rules of practice used by criminals who misrepresent themselves as alleged officers / administrators of the law in allegedly civilised Democratic States

The arrogance of abusers of trust is EVINCED in the invitation to the judiciary, who are independent of and free from the restraints of the law they are meant to serve, in accordance with the evidence, which evidence in the case stated / pointed to here was of no interest or concerns to the two blind, deaf and dumb morons; they simply served other plans by entertaining the invitation from the criminals who settled and submitted their invitations to abusers of judicial chairs occupation with the blessings of the police, Ministers and the media in the mother of all PSEUDOdemocracies.

On the right PROOF of invitation to the judges to deny rights assured in Law, allegedly,  to ALL citizens in the UK, under the European Convention, also the UN Charter and numerous International Treaties & Accords, without discrimination on any grounds, unless, of course, the administrators of the law elect to serve other 'undeclared interests & or superiors authorities command of such persons, as each and every one established in the instance at hand, the case pointed to here.

bcclce1r.jpg (59796 bytes) bcclce2r.jpg (75736 bytes)

*Link from here to the invisible service provided by two condescending Lord Justices who acted in contempt of the evidence & Parliament's Law as evinced in the part of the transcript we reproduce, image of, endorsed with a hint / invitation to the abusers of judicial chair occupation.

The Rules of the Supreme Court we refer to, provided:

Under 18/8/4: "It is the duty of counsel, not to enter a plea of fraud on the record ".... unless he has clear and sufficient evidence to support it". (see per Lord Denning in 'Associated Leisure Ltd. -v- Associated Newspapers Ltd. [1970] 2 Q.B. 450 at p. 456]. Any charge of fraud or misrepresentation must be pleaded with the utmost particularity. "In the Common Law Courts no rule was more clearly settled than that fraud must be distinctly alleged and as distinctly proved, and that it was not allowable to  leave fraud to be inferred from the facts". 

Solicitors in the first instance received full particulars and they proceeded to state the facts and delivered the submitted documented evidence to counsel. Counsel then settled and pleaded the specific fraud, in a commercial / business contract, as stipulated under the rules, in other words 'the evidence existed to support the claim for fraud. WHEN the two of them subsequently entertained and promoted the blunt forgery, as allegedly legitimate evidence, in support of a concocted Defence that never was (in the mode used by Lord Jeffrey Archer of recent years) fraud ceases to be a pleading but a realisation that the practitioners themselves are the biggest fraudsters going in our allegedly civilised society, a society that allegedly is founded and rests on law and order. In the instance we refer to here THERE WAS NO LAW but contempt of it by the very individuals the victim of fraud retained for recovery of his 'rights as assured and secured by law'.

rscpfraf.jpg (64874 bytes)
Mr Galpin, Counsel who settled the pleadings BENEFITED FROM ALL THE EVIDENCE. He elected to suppress very material facts and he was noted to have been a promoter and user of the forgery we point to.
MOST IMPORTANT ELEMENT READERS SHOULD NOTE: Barrister / Counsel retained and instructed by Mr. Kypros Nicholas >the solicitor< did recklessly suppress from the pleadings he settled, the fact that the evidence furnished to the licensed criminals included proof that the claim was supported by evidence the Defendants could not bury / ignore, simply because the contract to make up goods for the Defendants related to the making up of additional goods which the Defendants, acceppted andpaid for AFTER asserting and declaring the goods they had no client for >because the client cancelled< their order with the Defendants before the Defendants indulged in fraudulent assertions. The suppressed element, by the licensed criminals? The fact that the Defendants accepted and paid for the remainder of the made up goods. The visitor / reader can draw his or her mind as to WHY THE LICENSED CRIMINALS >the legal boffins< SUPPRESSED SUCH FACTS & INESCAPABLE EVIDENCE.
Under 18/9: "Subject to rules 7 (1), 10 and 15 (2), a  party may IN ANY PLEADING plead any matter which has arisen at any time WHETHER BEFORE OR SINCE the issue of the writ".

The provisions are clear, yet, how many victims of the legal circles, the operatives of the 'Self Perpetuating Cancerous Growth Industry' ©, have ever been assisted by the criminals in control to challenge the activities of the very circles? One only has to refer to the case of the member of the *human-rights.org * Community On Line* and the pleadings, STATED FACTS as submitted to the European Court of Human Rights, covering the violations imposed on the victim by the very circles, within our country [*Link]. When a judge, to all intents and purposes cannot grasp the difference between "IMPOSED ON THE CLIENT - by the solicitors representing the client" & endorses a submitted order by the offending solicitors' barrister whereby "there was NO INFLUENCE on the client, and the judge did indulge so, either as an illiterate in plain English or as a split personality acting in two diametrically opposed roles while sitting in a judicial chair what we do have is RAMPANT CORRUPTION through institutionalised & organised FRAUD on the citizens. The facilities (ARRANGEMENTS FOR THE CITIZENS)  are as clear as can be when one consider the words used under the very same Order and rules of the Supreme Court [*Link] whereby the outcome was predetermined by the criminals in control and the actors who sell an allegedly civilised democracy that allegedly rests and is founded on the rule of law - THE TYPE OF RULE & LAW we point you to through the above link. 

rscpfraf.jpg (64874 bytes)
Readers & researchers are urged to consider the provision qualifying RIGHTS TO PLEAD MATTERS ARISING AFTER THE ISSUE OF THE WRIT. We will release evidence to the effect that one and all from within the legal circles and the courts simply act in contempt of the provision.

Under 18/12/11  "Fraud - Para.(1) (b), supra, has reversed the former O.19 r.22, and it is now provided that the necessary particulars of fraudulent intention must be contained in the pleading. The pleader should accordingly set out the facts, matters and circumstances relied upon to show that the party charged had or was actuated by a fraudulent intention. Fraudulent conduct must be distinctly alleged and as distinctly proved, and it is not allowable to leave fraud to be inferred from the facts (Davy -v- Garrett, 7 Ch. D. p. 489; Behn -v- Bloom (1911), 132 L.T.J.87; Claudius Ash, Sons & Co,. Ltd. -v- Invicta Manufacturing Co., Ltd.. (1912), 29 R. P. C. 465, H.L). "General allegations, however strong may be the words in which they are stated, are insufficient to amount to an averment of fraud of which any Court ought to take notice" (Wallingford -v- Mutual Society, 5 App. Cas. p. 697; see especially the remarks of Lord Hatherley and Blackburn, pp. 701, 704.. The acts alleged to be fraudulent must be set out, and then it must be stated that these acts were done fraudulently, otherwise no evidence in support of them will be received (Re Rica Gold Washing Co., 11 Ch. D. 36; Redgrave -v- Hurd 20 Ch. D. 1; Smith -v- Chadwick, 9 App. Cas. 187:; Riding -v- Hawkins, 14 P. D. 56;; Lawrance -v- Noreys, 15 App. Cas. p, 221; But  from these acts fraudulent intent may be inferred (Johnson - Barnes [1883] W. N. 32; Herring -v- Bischoffscheim; [1876] W. N.. 77). Evidence of similar frauds was admitted where the statement of claim alleged that the fraud was part of a system (Edinburgh Life Assurance Co. -v- Y., [1911] 1lr. R. 306). Where the Plaintiff alleged that the entries made by defendant in certain books were false, he was ordered to identify the false entries and to state in what respect these entries were false and the nature of the falsehood or fraud alleged in respect of each item. (Newport etc., Co. -v- Paynter, 34 Ch. Div. 88, C. A. Harbord -v- Monk, 38 L. T. 411). But the fraud alleged in the pleading, and the fraud disclosed in the particulars, must be the fraud of the other party to the action, and not of a third person (Staffordshire Financial Co. -v- Hill (1909), 53 S. J. 446. H. L.) And see (n) "Concealed Fraud".......

rscfrinf.jpg (122886 bytes)
The OBVIOUS no one could overlook, when reading: 'The pleader should accordingly set out the facts, matters and circumstances relied upon to show that the party charged (claimed against in civil proceedings when the police default to execute their public duties as the evidence supports) had or was actuated by a fraudulent intention. *Link from here to image of part of an affidavit & note how the criminals in control of the courts' business actually invited a judge to DENY RIGHTS.
  • The JUDICIARY IN THE UNITED KINGDOM - blunt & arrogant invisible services.

All and everything in contempt of all Law, as the founder, Mr. Andrew Yiannides was subjected to by all alleged servants of the Law & the Public, in an allegedly civilised Democracy wherein the rule of Law rules Supreme, allegedly! 

We publish above evidence that Court of Appeal Lord Justices consciously and with intent engaged in the perversion of justice and denial of rights to a targeted citizen. As we state in other pages, the activities the legal circles engaged in, over a period of five years were the eye opener for Mr Andrew Yiannides, the creator of these pages and founder of the human-rights.org. The fact that the courts, all the way to the Court of Appeal, ENDORSED, AS THEY STILL DO, CRIMINAL ACTIVITIES by the legal circles; also, the fact that the judiciary engage and indulge in rampant perversion of justice, caused Mr. A Yiannides to reconsider his belief in the promotions he had been subjected to by his School Masters at the English School in Nicosia, Cyprus.[*Link from here to 'background' to human-rights]. The 'RSC bible' - 1973 edition (from which images in this page) was bought after a solicitor and barrister advanced and promoted a FORGERY that was procured by the adversaries of the solicitor's client, nearly three years after the causes of action arose. The solicitor eagerly promoted the forgery, to his client, as a valid document that allegedly 'supported a defence the other side settled and served in a case of fraudulent misrepresentations; the promotion of  the forgery two years after the close of pleadings, note.The aforesaid INSTRUMENT WAS FALSE because the defendants who were to rely on it qualified in letters that such a document as they procured/created and were promoting three years late, DID NOT EXIST in the first instance, as they wrote at the relevant time. Evidently, solicitor and barrister never heard of 'contemporaneous evidence' just as the criminals in charge of investigating crime, the police. All would have the serfs / taxpayers in the United Kingdom that none of them knew of the provisions on forgeries and false instruments intended to be used for the sole purpose of perverting justice. Nearly thirty years on, Lord Jeffrey Archer, for indulging in a similar and not so obvious / blunt and exercise, was sent to prison!

In fact the document and blunt FALSE INSTRUMENT that was introduced years after the events, was even FORGED after it was created. The criminals changed the date that was endorsed on the false instrument after realising that the creator, of the false instrument, erred and wrote the wrong year when creating it. The wrong year and subsequent amendment are as clear as can be; only a moron or a criminal who was/is party to such activities turns a blind eye to the obvious and ONLY AN OFFICER OF THE COURT WHO IS OFFERING INVISIBLE SERVICES TO CRIMINALS ELECTS TO IGNORE SUCH EVIDENCE AND THE LAW APPLICABLE IN SUCH MATTERS. The solicitors and their clients who had indulged in fraudulent misrepresentations, in the first instance, were relying on others, as from the service of the Writ of Summons and thereafter   the time when the FALSE & FORGED INSTRUMENT WAS INTRODUCED to promote and bring to fruition their new fraudulent intentions.
     NOTE: In fact they carried on relying on other criminals, the legal team of the targeted victim, to PROMOTE THE FORGERY AS A DOCUMENT ACCEPTABLE IN EVIDENCE FOR AND IN THE CASE. And both legal teams thereafter were relying on abusers of public office, from court staff to JUDGES, TO MISCONDUCT IN PUBLIC OFFICE in order to pervert and corrupt justice. Contempt of and for Parliament's Law, in the order of the day, as one recognises and gets to know of, through contact with the Law Enforcement Agencies and the legal circles, in our country.

From the solicitors, allegedly acting for the victim of fraud, through to the police and the judiciary, all playing their parts in constructive frauds at and through the courts. There followed arrogant impositions of obstruction and perversion of justice. In the above stated case the solicitors, failed to influence their client to abandon the claim / claims against the offenders. The legal circles thereafter indulged at the targeted client's expense while the police were ignoring the forgery, copy of which was handed to them. The police themselves were party to additional criminal activities while the legal circles engaged in compound frauds at and in the courts, such as the creation and promotion of false instruments such as allegedly legitimate Court Orders created by / issued by fraudsters who failed to address the issue of the forgery. WHEN Judicial chair occupants lend themselves to blunt corruption and perversion of Justice, in contempt of all law and evidence, with THE BLESSINGS OF THE POLICE, while a case was progressed all the way to the Court of Appeal. What the citizen was faced with was blunt and arrogantly ORGANISED - INSTITUTIONALISED FRAUD & CORRUPTION THROUGH THE COURTS.

*Link from here to a case when the solicitors IMPOSED on their client an agreed settlement. The client who had been intimidated and blackmailed to 'accept' the imposed settlement (as agreed between the legal teams), subsequently challenged it all on being told of the rights breached. The client, in that case, also uncovered secret, undisclosed and suppressed issues that amounted to another typical scenario as enacted by the legal circles with the blessings of judicial chair occupants. TYPICAL OF THE CRIMINALS occupying judicial chairs, the victim of all was denied justice and the participation of all public servants all the way to the European Court of Human Rights; the last scenario offering additional evidence in support of the declaration at the top of most of our pages' [*F6]

FOOTNOTE common to most web-pages at this website
MOST IMPORTANT:- In October 2010, the coalition Government's Attorney General, in an interview published by 'COUNSEL' the mothly legal banter magazine, specifically spoke of the police distancing themselves from cases of (small-fry) fraud and he asserted that he was making that element his department's priority*

*Link from here to the evidence.

IT REMAINS TO BE SEEN, WHAT the coalition of the Con-LibDems, THE GOVERNMENT OF THE DAY WILL IN FACT ATTEND TO THE RAMPANT FRAUD, and IF IT WILL DEAL with the criminals who abuse public office, especially when faced with appropriate submissions and claims that will be delivered in due course. Visitors/readers are urged to read the article published in the London Evening Standard, as settled by the Rt. Hon. David Blunkett, Home Secretary in 2003
*Link from here to the article we reproduce in another webpage and consider "Why tolerate the arrogance of the legal circles who had and have the audacity to assert to the lawmakers that they, the lawmakers have nothing to do with the law"?
While there, above it, the explicit letter to ex-Minister, the Rt. Hon. Frank Field MP, delivered a few days earlier. ALL alleged victim-challengers who contacted Andrew Yiannides, by the time the letter was sent to the Minister, received copy of the letter just as they received copies of other letters submitted to government maintained Ministers and other official appointees to public office. Accessing the material pointed to from the letter (URLs) is of utmost importance. It should assist 'recognition of the citizen's rights at work', when called upon properly in truly democratic states. The above in 2003; there were other 'submissions' and among such civilised and, within the law, approaches by citizens that led to the right actions by governments, the explicit challenges when we set about exposing one of the most evil of alleged victims of the legal circles to have ever contacted us.

*Link from here to our explicit submissions to (a) the Prime Minister, (b) the Chancellor / Treasury, (c) and, the Home Secretary. We acted so after we had secured more than enough evidence about the parts of an alleged victim whose only interests were (i) the rewards under the table FOR KEEPING QUIET about the ORGANISED FRAUD THROUGH ABUSE OF THE COURTS' FACILITIES and (ii) her parts in blunt attempts that were intended to discredit the person she was sent along to mess about with, Mr Andrew Yiannides.

Access please the letter to the Home Secretary, the Rt. Hon. Jack Straw, in December 1998

*Link from here to the letter

& note the results evinced in the newspaper article (Hornsey Journal) also within days of the letter reaching its destination. Many the charlatans and stooges -lovers and 'promoters of the system as is'- on the job for decades; one and all acting as sold souls always do

*Link from here to the evidence we point to relative to the parts of one of a number of sold to the system fraudsters who were sent along / introduced to Andrew Yiannides by the managers / organisers of the LIPS crowd / mob..


    1.   We always point(ed) persons who contact(ed) us, either as directed by others or of their own, to the fact that the founder of the human-rights.org Mr Andrew Yiannides never endorsed the blunt constructive frauds through the abused courts' facilities'. We cover, in our exclusive page*, the arrogant arrangements in place for rampant fraud on the taxpayers, and visitors who have not accessed the material, should do so without fail [*Link from here to solid evidence]. Mr Andrew Yiannides, the creator of this web-site and founder of the *human-rights* (organisation on line) turned down a number of offers and invitations to join the world of the corrupters and the corrupted simply because the practices within the courts (as organised by the legal circles and taken to fruition by abusers of judicial chair occupation) amount to gross abuse of the courts facilities for conversion of assets targeted, including use of TAX REVENUE FOR THE 'REWARDS to victims of the practices who convert to silent supporters, maintenance engineers & front line users of the practices, as covered and exposed in the exclusive page which victims(!) and the media barons have shoved in the dark corners of their 'blank minds' and their mentality towards the taxpayers who are called upon to pay taxes for the maintenance of such facilities in an allegedly civilised pseudodemocracy; a state where SUPPRESSION OF THE TRUTH & PROMOTION OF FALSE STATES ARE THE FOUNDATION & THE CORNER STONE UPON WHICH ALL IS FOUNDED & RESTS. [*Link1 - *Link2 - *Link3 - *Link4] 
    2.   More often than not the placing of appeals for hearing before TWO ONLY court of Appeal LJ's is used as a smokescreen for undisclosed end-products in such scenarios. On occasions when appellants were informed of / challenged with the implications they were reported to Mr Andrew Yiannides to have 'benefited from the granting of a hearing before a full panel, THREE Lord Justices. On the 'alleged occasions' Mr Yiannides was NOT invited to the 'hearings promoted, conveniently, by third parties and not the alleged challengers!!! One of the instances when such promotions were spoken of, the 'appellant and his affiliates / associates miraculously failed to invite Mr Yiannides to 'the promoted venue' - theatrical productions in closed circuit, and targeted sucker-victims invited to such venues, in order to impress them with the facilities intended to lead to the rewards under the table, to conversion of the targeted to *fraudsters club recruits*. We point and link from here to the scenarios attached to the promotions through the press / media in respect of the saga created for and in the Geoffrey Harold Scriven DIVORCE CASE. We inform visitors / readers that such promotions came our way after we pointed the fact that the scenario / presentations in February 2000, before two Lord Justices ONLY (besides other elements) AMOUNTED TO MORE THAN A QUESTIONABLE VENUE', simply because RULINGS FROM SUCH VENUES DO NOT CONSTITUTE precedent cases that can, reliably, be used in/for other 'presentations, submissions & arguments at court'.
    3.     *Access from here the page where we publish a letter from an abuser of the trust he was permitted to benefit from while he was being assisted; get to know of the fcat that he was under investigation all the while, peruse diligently the links we use to point to his wilful and foul of the law activities, observed and noted by the person who guided him how to secure recordings of proceedings in order to benefit from unadulterated and factual 'records' of hearings at court. NOTE the elements that arose at the time prior to and at the time when Mr Norman Scarth wrote the letter that merited ALL OF THE OBSERVATIONS & SUBMISSIONS / CHALLENGES we realte in our pages. Andrew Yiannides had no option but to address and deal with the unacceptable misrepresentations many indulge in, in view of Mr Scarth's and his associates (from within the LIPS crowd/mob) who were noted to be operating as maintenance engineers, as promoters and as users of / beneficiaries from the spoils of the criminal activities instigated, promulgated, processed and executed through abuse of the courts facilities we cover in the exclusive web-page not one of the corrupted fraudsters ever addressed. Mr Scarth, his associates -from within the LPS crowd/mob- and their affiliates were fully aware of the fcat that Andrew was very familiar with the criminal activities and conversant with their parts as maintenance engineers of thje system of operations in the courts. Access also from here the page where we published the two pages from a transcript Mr Norman Scarth created (as he had been guided to secure from judicial chair occupants). Read the content of the 2 pages, recognise the elements of interest and WHY we published only the 2 pages and not the rest of the hearing before a full bench of the Court of Appeal at the RCJ, London. NOTE, however that for years the only elements we published were the two images with an introduction as to who secured the permission to record the hearing and who created the transcript while we were expecting of Mr Scarth (as a person who had agreed to act as webmaster for the Community on Line for the County of Yorkshire and the city of Leeds. As a committed to the system as is & as a convert to the abuse of the courts facilities for rampant fraud on the taxpayers (pointed to in the exclusive page) he failed to ever refer to issues raised or address the content of the exclusive page, covering as it did and does the criminal activities he and his associates with their affiliates had fallen in love with and converted to maintenance engineers of the rampant fraud on the taxpayers.
    4.   *Access from here a page where we publish material facts and realities born of a case when THEFT of Housing Benefit funds owing to owners of private properties was the name of the INSTITUTIONALISED FRAUD & CORRUPTION of new Letting Agency staff. Many the cases and many the properties occupied by the organised influx of refugees and asylum seekers, rushing to the land of milk and honey. The rush creating the need for funds, LEADING TO THE INSTIGATED by Local Authorities, their staff and their officers fraudulent misrepresentations to the owners of properties and thereby the CONSTRUCTIVELY ENGINEERED FRAUDS THROUGH RELIANCE ON THE COURTS TO PROCESS, to entertain, to endorse and to impose on the helpless properties owners ARROGANT FRAUD and theft of properties. NOTE: The explicit appeal lodged at court in the instance we point to, DID CAUSE the government in the United Kingdom to announce the Bill of Rights, almost 40 YEARS AFTER signing up to the European Convention on Human Rights.
    5.    *July 2011, the Intellectual Prostitutes in the United Kingdom afforded us the avenues and the means that SOULD PROVIDE all victims of the ORGANISED ABUSE OF THE COURTS FACILITIES (in fact the abusers of judicial chair occupation) THE WAY FORWARD. If ever the victims wished, desired to EXPOSE & CHALLENGE OPENLY the abusers of public office and the courts facilities, their chance and oppportunity was pointed to by us when the facility for free website space was first created by Andrew Yiannides in conjunction with the USA corporation that contracted with Andrew to make available such facilities under the human-rights.org banner. Many the alleged victim challengers who signed up to the fcailities / provisions and conveniently failed to interlink / connect with other members for and because of other reasons than the need to challenge and expose collectively the abusers of the courts facilities as we cover in our pages. Many the alleged victim-challengers who simply indulged in all manner of promotions to targeted 'newbies' to NEW VICTIMS of the organised abuse of the courts facilities for fraud aplenty, especially after the new victims joined the human-rights.org Community on Line. [*Link from here to evidence when such services to the system's operatives were the main objective of the corrupted]
    6.    The URL pointed to from the realities covered above, is presently off line becuase the beneficiary of the arrangements through the ECtHR so arranged. However, as the Intellectual Property attached to the submissions to the ECtHR, happens to be owned by Andrew Yiannides it will be reinstated in due course. We ask visitors / readers and researchers to access from here the challenges to the Eurpean Court of Human Rights, when the usual ploy was asserted. Access read and considerthe simple fact that the attempt and challenge brough about changes and instead of the proposed destruction of thesubmitted papers perttaining to the case, the papers were rushed by courier back to London. Use grey matter reader andaskyourself "Why propose the destruction of the papers after a year was to lapse IF there was no settlement REWARD in the usual manner? Read carefully the challenges to the carft-y operating from within the ECtHR and then consider2Why did the victim pass all of the papers pertaining to the case, failed to assign her rights to the person who should have been allowed to carry on with the false states Andrew Yiannides challenged IF the victim did not go for the REWARDS UNDER THE TERMS and conditions we expose her at human-rights.org/confraud.htm#records ?
    7.    xxx
    8.    xxx

Link to:  Lord Chancellor   Home Office   THE LAW   The National Scandal
Link to:  The CAMILA Project   The LATEST   Daily Mail 30July 98   Downing Street 
Back to HomePage 


The creator of this website was inviting victims to access URrights & join him there with other victims to expose & challenge abusers of trust & public office until the providers of the facilities >ning.com< introduced new terms and conditions for the provision of the facilities. Access from here and read of the imposed states by the brains behind ning.com and consider only one element "WHY OBSTRUCT & HINDER THE DOWNLOAD of the existing material at URrights.ning.com >the intellectual properties of the creator of that presence on the Internet and those who joined him there? Read below of the unacceptable conduct and behaviour by the reckless abusers of trust, who set out to obstruct and blackmail the creator of URrights.ning

Persons who are genuinely concerned and object to the ways they were / are being treated by alleged servants of the publicand the law >in any PSEUDOdemocracy, or whatever states / conditions they are subjected to< by abusers of public facilities and public office >as we cover in our web-pages< should contact webmaster@human-rights.org for information relevant to the creation of similar facilities for INFOrmation on URrights, for facilities for URrights EUrope and for a NETwork of URrights activists.

  • APOLOGIES to friends and persons who could not access URrights following the recent changes by the providers of the facility (ning.com) Andrew Yiannides created and used the portal to create the presence on the Internet for the group of victims / challengers who joined with him to expose and challenge the arrogant and blunt abuse of public services in all allegedly civilised societies > PSEUDODEMOCRACIES <.

  • The changes related to the introduction of charges for the facilities, included the facility for ning.com to archive the material at URrights; also the facility to download the archived material to the creator's system (computer) while the creator and his group of friends considered which of the level of charges and service the group was to adopt.

  • HOWEVER the creator, Andrew Yiannides, WAS UNABLE TO DOWNLOAD THE ARCHIVED MATERIAL and all attempts to engage the providers and their staff in reasonable explanation as to WHY THE FAILURES TO CONNECT / DOWNLOAD from the ning.com servers THE ARCHIVED MATERIAL, were contemptuously ignored.

  • Emails to the Publicity, to the Promotion, to the Public Relations, also to the Chief Executive's Office merited no response whatsoever from anyone acting for ning.com

  • In the circumstances Andrew will appreciate any information related to the problems covered above. Andrew will also appreciate any information relative to exchanges with or email postings, from ning.com to existing members.

  • EXISTING URrights members, victims of the legal system, victims of solicitors and the courts should access the updated pages at .org/solicitors.htm and .org/solfraud.htm by using the links from the list below.

Below pages where we expose known lovers of it all, users and maintenance engineers of the system as is

.org/1999dfax.htm .org/1ofmany.htm .org/2lipstalk.htm .org/4deceit.htm .org/absolute.htm .org/abusers.htm
.org/account4.htm .org/actors.htm .org/actors2.htm .org/adoko.htm .org/bankers.htm .org/beware.htm
.org/blunket1.htm .org/chaldep1.htm .org/confraud.htm .org/contract.htm .org/convicti.htm .org/courts.htm
.org/corruptcourts.htm .org/crimesin.htm .org/dreamers.htm .org/evesused.htm .org/evilones.htm .org/famfraud.htm
.org/govolso.htm .org/guesswhy.htm .org/len.htm .org/mauricek.htm .org/media.htm .org/solfraud.htm
.org/solicitors.htm .org/someplan.htm .org/someploy.htm .org/thefacts.htm .org/theproof.htm .org/thenerve.htm
.org/twisted.htm .org/uaccount.htm .org/ukmm.htm .org/uwatchit.htm .org/watchit1.htm .org/yourtax.htm
  • Every single person we name and expose in the above pages elected to ignore THEIR OBLIGATIONS TO REPORT (to 'the serfs' = 'the taxpayers'), THE ABUSERS OF PUBLIC OFFICE & PUBLIC FACILITIES. All were/are relying on the Intellectual Prostitutes, from within the media, to keep it all in the family closet.
  • All, as typical twin-tongue hypocrites carry on complaining about the media for failing to report & for suppressing the facts and the realities they allegdely reported to the hard of hearing, to the otherwise committed angels blowing their silent trumpets for decades, all ready and gearing to welcome the expansion of the New World Order.
  • Of such parts the contributions from and failings of the persons we name and expose, AS IF THEIR OWN SILENCE, THEIR FAILURES  & THEIR BLUNT OBSTRUCTIONS to the work and other actions by the creator of this website, Andrew Yiannides, treated by one and all as if non-existent with the exception when the wily Norman Scarth, set off to abuse the trust he was allowed to benefit from, while his parts and questionable activities / performance were under scrutiny, specifically after HE FAILED to publish the full transcript of the Court of Appeal hearing HE WAS ALLOWED TO RECORD* [*Link from here to the food for thought page created by Andrew Yiannides, in the first instance].
  • Not one ever bothered to address the issues we expose in the explicit page, despite the fact that we have been pointing all of our contacts, since May 1992, to it all.
  • Visitors, readers and researchers are urged / invited to access and read the letter which the Hon. Secretary of the Litigants In Person Society, Mr. Norman Scarth sent to the founder of human-rights, Mr. Andrew Yiannides, reproduced in the page .org/4deceit.htm* [*L]
  • The author's statements, such as 'what for and why seek additional assistance', thereby spelling out his parts as a lover of it all.
  • Common sense dictates, that he should have directed his request to his partners in deceptions aplenty, one & all engaging in fraudulent misrepresentations AND NOTED TO HAVE, WILFULLY, BEEN SUPPRESSING, FROM THE TAXPAYERS, THE FACTS OF LIFE RELATIVE TO THE RAMPANT ABUSE OF THE COURTS FACILITIES as the failure of all to co-operate as covered and pointed to at:- [*L]. One and all fallen to the facilities for fraud aplenty on the taxpayers and the corruption of illiterates in law, the conditioned victims of the legal circles & courts who fall to the blackmail element attached to the REWARD for keeping the realities away from the taxpayers; just like the media and the Ministers responsible for the application of long existing law to the criminal activities we cover in our pages, do.
  • All the while one and all were / are engaging in the scenarios we cover in the exclusive page, which page the author of the letter which Mr Norman Scarth sent to Andrew Yiannides, afforded us the opportunity to address the issue of the contributions of his partners and affiliates in fraud aplenty on the taxpayers; despite the reminder one and all, named in the new page simply shoved it all in the dark corners of their devoid of grey matter skulls, their perverted / corrupted mind(s)

On Sunday morning, the 19th September 2010, the Deputy Prime Minister, leader of the Liberal-Democrats in the course of the BBC TV politics programme, spoke of the coalition government's commitment to address the element of waste and fraud through the public services sector. We trust and hope that the elements we expose in our pages and the parts adopted by the conditioned victims of the legal circles, the persons who engage in PROMOTING & EXPANDING THE ONGOING CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUD ON THE TAXPAYERS, THROUGH ABUSE OF THE COURTS' FACILITIES, will be on the top of the list of government priorities.
Visitors, readers & researchers are urged to access the letters to Minister Frank Field [*L] after he had been directed by the Prime Minister to think/do the unthinkable.
Link also from here [*L] to the explicit letter to the Home Secretary in December 1998 with submissions arising out of the RAMPANT HOUSING BENEFIT FRAUD
On Tuesday 23rd November 2010, 'the Guardian' in its Comment & Debate page carried an article by Nick Clegg, the Deputy Prime Minister. In the evening of the same day the Deputy Prime Minister addressed a large audience at Kings place in respect of the government's changes on university students fees / loans.
Access from here the page where we reproduce an image of 'the Guardian' article & consider the simple fact that we, alone, have been asserting and proclaiming our objections to the theft of funds from the national budget leading to the ever-increasing annual deficit in the state's balance of payments.

ACCESS:  http://www.justice-uk.human-rights.org/ (For an important message at this Community-on-Line web-site) & thereafter,
Access also http://www.law.society.complaints.and.human-rights.org/ (Judge instigates Fraud On Tax Payers - he knows not the difference between 'imposed' & 'no undue influence'). APOLOGIES FOR THE DISAPPEARANCE OF THIS WEBSITE.It appears that the beneficiary of the work, both for applications to the courts in the United Kingdom and the submissions to the European Court for Human Rights* [*Link from here to the Statement of Facts submitted to the ECoHR], arranged with the providers of the free web space to erase the Intellectual Property of Andrew Yiannides, the founder of the human-rights Community-on-Line, without any reference to the creator of the website and owner of the Intellectual Property!
鼯font> Copyright subsists on all material in our web-site, owned by the authors of same.
Visitors can refer to these pages in any non commercial activity, so long as attribution is given as to source. License to use, for commercial or other specific use of the material, shall have been secured in writing first, from the owners of any property and material from these pages. No material shall be reproduced in any form and by any means without prior agreement and or license in writing from the copyright owners. The Press are invited to contact us if they wish to publish material in the Public Interest, As We Do.
For any problems or questions regarding this web-site contact:  webmaster