October 2010 the coalition (Con-Lib-Dems) Government's Attorney General, the Rt. Hon.
Dominic Grieve QC, in an interview to 'COUNSEL'* [*L] qualified that
his priority was to address the issue of 'the police distancing themselves -systematically
we add- in cases of fraud and directing the victims -who report such matters to the
police, as the law commands- to instruct solicitors. The government (the A.G, naturally)
also the media are invited to access the Dimbleby Lecture (BBC-TV November 1973) as
delivered by Sir Robert Mark QPM [*L] and the page where
we point to the fact -and the evidence- that TWO Lord Justices sitting at the Court of
Appeal, indulged, in usual manner : in blunt and arrogant contempt for the law
addressing issues of the very nature the Metropolitan Police Commissioner himself ALSO
INDULGED in over a year before the famous lecture; yet he had the audacity to refer to
criminal activities, by the legal circles, such as he alluded to in the course of his
Television Lecture which he delivered on TV for the sucker-serfs to ponder upon, as his
contribution towards the 'dust in your eyes sheeple' services. From here link [*L] also to the case
when the police created their own false records as their contribution towards the creation
of false states intended to obstruct / block Andrew Yiannides from securing employment in
an area he could have been contributing positively towards the creation of considerate
humans / thinkers, as the material facts, including letters, published at the website
||Courts & Court Service *Page first published February 1997*
HELP US TO HELP YOU Please [*Link to plea].
others on Line and publish your Statement of Facts,
also the Evidence you have. Use your rights in law and ACT
with other victims against the offenders. It is in the victims'
interest to work with one another for successes through the evidence all can share.
Victims can benefit from the use of pooled data that establishes the common practices, as
in the case of the member whose case Mr Yiannides submitted to the European
Court of Human Rights. In our pages we have published the STATED FACTS and the VIOLATIONS
pleaded for you to access the details of in order to NOTE the VERY COMMON practices at and
in our courts. [*Link to page]
For DATA Collection :
ACCESS the petition to the ECoHR as registered in
June 2002. Access THE FACTS
stated & the VIOLATIONS
pleaded. Compare the facts stated with your own experiences. Click on either link (above),
for connection to the application, then scroll up / down for the rest of the submissions.
If you are publishing anything and wish to link to the pages contact us or the member.
Information for bookmarks, to link to, will be furnished and bookmarks to any part can be
introduced for connection to from your site. WE will try to meet the requirements of all
who seek unadulterated & unblemished 'Justice'.You are also invited to work with and
co-operate with the members of the Community. together we shall unshackle Justice
and release her from the dungeons of the RCJ. If you copy any material, ensure that you
credit and qualify the source of the intellectual property.
ACCESS the member's site for
additional information and how solicitors and courts did act in contempt of the LAW. Find
out how judicial chair occupants acted in contempt of the documented evidence, thereby
furnishing additional proof and evidence as to the priorities of the controllers of CIUKU
Enterprises. Read of the capabilities of a slit personality - a judge
of two minds, an illiterate in English and in Law, serving the rampant Fraud &
Corruption that abounds in our country.
the creation of the mass of evidence against the offending public servants. It will
support actions you and others can instigate jointly and or severally. We cover In our
pages such rights, & the laws breached and violated by the state through the public
servants who defraud citizens of their rights in law and
their assets / properties. Access the relevant page and consider our invitation and your rights.
content of this page very carefully and recognise how each of the protagonists was after
self-promotion while at the same time agreeing over what was to come from within their
circles, as a mob organised at deceit with undeclared intentions and 'stitch you up,
behind your back mate', as fast learners care of the facilities we cover in the exclusive
and clearly stated page: * /confraud.htm *
'RSC bible' - 1973 edition bought after a solicitor advanced and
promoted a FORGERY procured by his client's adversaries. He eagerly promoted the forgery,
to his client, as a valid document that allegedly 'supported a defence the other side
settled and served in a case of fraud/misrepresentation.
we point to important elements that are clarified in the rules
'the professionals are meant to adhere to.
It covers FRAUD
It covers the duty of Counsel to court & client by
extension and never mind the arrangements between the legal circles. Their victims can
plead issues of Reliance on one another AND on public servants to or who misconduct in
public office & include the offenders as defendants. NO ONE IS ABOVE THE LAW.....
This little gem makes it clear that a matter arising AFTER THE issue of the writ CAN BE PLEADED by the parties to an action during the instigated
and ongoing proceedings.
2006 Action taken in respect of abuse of
the courts' facilities & the ORGANISED DESTRUCTION of Families with intent
- SEALED by the court staff & SERVED by victim Mr Gary Westcar a victim of the family
courts in the U.K
We invite victims of the divorce industry & the courts, the
legal circles in general, to contact us AFTER READING the issues we point to below:
Article 6 of the ECoHR provides: - "In the determination of his CIVIL
RIGHTS & OBLIGATIONS or of any criminal charge against him, everyone is
entitled to a fair and PUBLIC HEARING within reasonable time by an
INDEPENDENT and IMPARTIAL tribunal established by law".
We underlined the word OBLIGATIONS which all fraudsters club
recruits elected to ignore yet, they are all running around offering legal services -
ASSISTANCE TO OTHER MORONS, playing along with the criminals who are in control of the
courts and the legal system. Their only interest and target the undeclared cash under the
table on submission of petitions to the European Court of Human Rights for cases which
they full well know to have been subject to fraudulently engineered proceedings intended
to lead to the rewards under the table as we cover in our exclusive page. We refer to the
page which ALL elected to ignore along with the media barons and the Intellectual
Prostitutes retained and maintained by the media barons
||Page Revised: August 27, 2012 - ADDED : Links to and from other pages
& documented evidence
Site reconstruction with ongoing
editorial changes, new material and pages with links to from other pages / sites
|Guidelines on Navigating through the
extensive material: access instructions.
|As part of the reconstruction process our
new pages and pages where changes and additions have been implemented, the improved /
amended pages are endorsed with the link 'Page Changes and the date of the last changes.
The link takes visitors to a List of the changes implemented in the page. These include
new material and links from relevant paragraphs to other or new relevant material in
other pages. For further clarification email: webmaster@
SERVICE IN THE UNITED KINGDOM
HOW & WHAT FOR the courts and legal
services are used in the United Kingdom >as in other PSEUDOdemocracies
WE propose to publish
documents as posted by and received from Courts. It will be for the public and the world
at large (as unbiased jurors) to determine and marvel at the capabilities and the
PRACTICES that somehow repetitiously and systematically the public, in the United
Kingdom, is subjected to. It is ALL done for and in the interests of the legal
professions. (*See footnote) The citizens -treated as 'serfs' or subjects to the
whims of the corrupt and the corrupted- have no rights to protection under any law. And
thus the corrupters just march on unhindred as the corrupted join the corrupters for
expansion & entrenchment of the New Wolrd Order.
The most common practice
- Court ORDERS - arising out of non-events & not in accordance with rules of
procedure. *Link from here [*L] to such
practices, also to a challenge when a county court judge (D.J) was indulging in
contempt of the law and the rules [*L] of
procedure : contempt for 'due process' as provided / stipulated in international law :
ECHR). In the first example / link *Orders POSTED LATE, also, in order to misdirect
actions and cases into the biggest fraud ongoing, in our courts, that of appeal
THROUGH LEAVE TO APPEAL, as the late postings created / 'opened that route'.
We point, in the concluding words above, to the
created need for 'Leave to Appeal', ploy, 'you are late'.
The above route is the most abused for
perverting justice, as court cases are treated, by the criminals who plan and are in
control of it all.
A common abuse of the rules
of procedure leading to many a naive, and, illiterate in Court practice, citizens
falling victim to the costs for 'leave to appeal' PLOYS from 'judicial'
[Note: 'NOT judicious' : *Link* [*L] to definition] orders'
that rest and are founded on abuse of office and court facilities, as the case you were /
can link to from the second bulleted paragraph, above.
The rules applicable to the 'leave to
appeal' rouse are in no way part of any act of Parliament. Just another 'facility'
put in place by the abusers of the legal system / the court service. The 'convenient
facility' simply justifies the conclusion that the intention was and has always been
'fraud' because of the element that is introduced, used and relied upon by the abusers of
the courts' facilities.
Leave to appeal leads to : "NOTHING TO DO
WITH THE MERITS OF THE CASE ITSELF'. Inexcusable and unjustified waffle, by the
administrators of Justice and the courts service, consequential to constructively
engineered fraud on Mr & Mrs Average. And, Members of Parliament, simply ignoring it
all, as illiterates in law, not to mention elected members of parliament with a
professional background 'in law'! [*Link from here
to the words of a solicitor an extract from a letter to a client in March 2003].
PLEA: We need assistance,
in order to secure access to the Old Master, the painting of the Biblical Scene that was
used in the production of the TV programme we refer to, at the site you can link to from here.
THE COURT SERVICE staff, like automata, always respond to
victims (who complain about the denial of fair treatment by the courts) with the
usual 'Independence of the Judiciary', excuse [*Link
from here to an interesting letter from an illiterate public servant] as
if judges are also independent of the restrains of law in matters of honesty and
deception. No provisions for any
authority, not even the person (Minister) responsible FOR the judiciary, to oversee and
investigate legitimate complaints arising out of the commonest of criminal activities that
judicial chair occupants engage / partake in, and even instigate of their own. Simple and blatant violation of Article 13 of the European Convention of
Human Rights, leading to, and often resting on other blatant violations of human rights
because of and for the other ulterior motives of the Legal/Judicial/Police TRIAD that
operate the free-for-all in the United Kingdom. All know of the
fact that THERE EXISTS NO AUTHORITY TO SUPERVISE AND MONITOR the conduct of judicial chair
occupants and IF JUDGES ACT within the reemit of their retainers, as public servants!
Their undertakings under the Judicial Oath are very clear; yet in one bothers to check or
follow up complaints on issues that clearly evince / suggest that THEIR PRESUMED KNOWLEDGE
OF LAW IS APPLIED, at all, when dispensing with their public duties!
The lack of
ADMINISTRATION (from above and from within the Justice Department / The Lord Chancellor
and his office) simply created the free-for-all the legal circles thrive in and benefit
from. Most certainly the situation has been so for decades, as Andrew, the founder of
*human-rights*, recognised over 39 years ago. [*Link
from here to the arrogant assurances from the judiciary
to the politicians and to all other public servants TO BE ABSOLVED OF ANY WRONGDOING
one and all impose on the sucker-serfs who have taxes imposed on them for such 'amenities
to the criminals in control of an allegedly civilised society, a PSEUDOdemocracy resting
and founded on rampant fraud and the corruption of morons* [*L] such as we point to in our pages].
The situation may well have been so FOR CENTURIES because public servants, from within the Law Enforcement
Agencies, default.to apply themselves
to Parliament's Law [*F5]. References to the works of Charles Dickens, in our pages, ought
not to be treated casually; he knew a thing or two, for in 'Bleak House' and 'The Pickwick
Papers', for instance, he expressed clearly 'stated views / his observations'.
So did the creators of the New Testament
also, for they put on record, in the Gospel according to St. Luke, one reads of 'the
parctices of the Lawyers 2000 years ago, as practiced by the followers of the
teachings by examples stated in the most vile of works ever to have been misrepresented to
mankind. In conjunction with the aforesaid 'warnings', the words attributed to
Jesus Christ according to the Gospel of St. John (one of the John's in any case) to
the religious leaders of the Hebrews of His days J.C reocorded to have retorted :
"You Are Of Your Father The Devil" >>> Neeed one wonder WHY the
assaults on Christianity / Christians, as in the case of the teacher we point to [*L] care of Andrew Yiannides' assistance to the victim-teacher who was
ignored and abandoned by one and all? WE invite readers / visitors to consider our closing
words in respect of the role of 'the media' in an allegedly civilised..... PSEUDOdemocracy
where suppression of the truth / the realities and contempt for ALL law rule supreme as we
cover and expose in our pages.
ruling in "The Downing Street Years - case" [*Link] exposed the sham of it all. It was but a typical example of what our Judiciary
excel at. The income generating conditions for the circles from within which our Judges
rose/rise to public office IS ALWAYS their first priority.
IT IS FOR THE PRESENT LORD CHANCELLOR to
adhere to the promise made by the Labour Party, when in opposition, and to keep a register
of bad judges: 'we refer to the issue of false instruments that lack
accountability by the authors, the judges. It is and IT will be the
responsibility of the present Government to ensure that legislation is introduced to
ensure that TRUE UNBIASED AND UNTAINTED COURT PROCEEDINGS (in accordance with the
provisions of Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights) ARE FULLY RECORDED. It
costs less than TWO POUND STERLING to use a 4 hour video tape at extended play speed (8
hours) to secure TRUE RECORDS of what goes on inside the theatres of our Judicial
|NO CAMERAS !!!!
|NO RECORDINGS !!!! [*Link from here to a transcript
when the Court of Appeal allowed Mr Norman Scarth to record, *Link also from here to suppression of it by the arrogant abuser of
trust, Mr Norman Scarth, who set up business with his LIPS chums & their affiliates,
as fraudsters club recruits]
|WHY, IF everything is within the law and as the
|Why the protection racket? (For the answer all taxpayers MUST visit the page where we cover and
expose the organised fraud through the legal circles with blunt participation by the
courts' staff and officers -judicial chair occupants)
|WHO want to protect whom from exposure? [*Link from here to
dreamers and lovers of the rampant fraud THROUGH THE COURTS]
|WHY tamper with tape recordings by cutting and
splicing, editing parts of the truth out? [*Link
from here to proof]
WHY generate, with intent, unnecessary
volumes of paperwork (third parties benefiting for transcripts 'to be approved by the
directors of all fraud and corruption at and through the courts) IN THIS DAY AND AGE of
ELECTRONIC wonders? WHY NOT TRUE uncut and UNEDITED VIDEO RECORDINGS for ALL Court
hearings and proceedings in our Courts ??? [*Link from here to a House of Lords
Precedent case, dating back to 1939-40 and consider the elements their Lordships applied
themselves to and deliberated upon].
Your Lordship, and the Right Honourable
Members of Parliament DO NOTE this simple principle: Justice should be seen to be WORKING for and in the
service of the people NOT the legal circles. Cut waste and fraud in the legal system at a stroke, no
dilly dallying. We point you all to the most offensive of criminal activities at and
through the courts. Many the charlatans and stooges who are drawn into the corrupt world
of the lawyers, operating as lovers of the facilities in place for Rampant Fraud on the
budget and the Corruption of morons, who go for it although fully aware of the fact that
what they go for and engage in, is FRAUD on the taxpayers, on Mr & Mrs Average. (*F1).
ON DEMAND your Lordship. (*F3 a most important Footnote)
CEASE TREATING THE CITIZENS AS SIMPLE
THEY ARE NO LONGER ILLITERATE SERFS OF THE MIDDLE AGES AND THEY
SHOULD NOT BE SUBJECTS TO THE WHIMS OF THE QUANGOS, THE GOVERNING ELITE AND OR THE
ORGANISED BLIND, DEAF AND DUMB MEDIA BARONS AND OR THEIR EDITORS.
THIS IS THE AGE OF FREEDOM OF INFORMATION AND
*Link from here to
a video clip when Sen. Jay Rokefeller spoke of the Internet not being part of the
YOUR VIEWS on the subject matter are welcome. How about a petition for legislation
to VIDEO record all Court Proceedings with automatic right to copies for the parties as
with the police audio recordings that Parliament provided for, under The Police And
Criminal Evidence Act 1984?
WHY DISCRIMINATE against the police?
|Why assume / treat the legal
boffins / circles as infallible individuals, who are presumed not to be subject to the
very temptations the police now are meant to be investigating* in such high places?
|*Link from here to Sir
Robert Mark's, the Metropolitan Police Commissioner's >Dimbleby Lecture in 1973< as
prepared and delivered by him on BBCV-TV
Refer to *Link from here to the front page
headlines of the Daily Mail on 30th July 1998 and to Paul Johnson's essay in November 1998*
*Link from here
also to an explicit article in the London Evening Standard, in September 1999*
WE DID SAY *meant to be investigating*,
back in 1998 when we added the above 'more dust in your eyes, long suffering public'. The
obliging media barons always ready, willing and able to promote the vile schemes of the
controllers of CIUKU Enterprises, as with the present 'stirring up' of racial disharmony
because of the refugees and asylum seekers, the states created by the fraudsters who
follow the teachings by examples stated in the most vile of works ever to have been
misrepresented -with fraudulent intentions- to mankind, by its creators, their successors
and by the many who sought power as Magalomaniacs and impostors, over the centuries /
millennia since the concocted rubbish by seasoned criminals was delivered to Ptolemy of
Egypt under specific cicumstances humans have been deprived knowledge of 'the truth', care
of the plans of the criminals who created and the leaders of the followers of the
concocted vile creation, the Old Testament*
*Link from here to
an extract, the most clear of hints from the vile work, for thinkers to consider
Convenient that through defaults and
omissions the media barons always produce half baked potatoes.
FACT: On 13 December, 2002, the Crime Editor of 'The Sun' reported his
views* Odd that he discovered pantomimes in the courts BY AND FOR THE CRIMINALS
who are in control of YOUR RIGHTS IN LAW Mr & Mrs Average Sheeple.
|*Link from here to the page we created around the editor's
|*Link from here to a page where we
point to some of the rights assured -allegedly- in International Law. We wrote to the Crime Editor of 'The Sun' first by email and two
weeks later by FAX .... but ....NO RESPONSE, from Intellectual Prostitutes, who indulge in
typical ostrich acts.... sold to the system / or captive of it.... serving other interests
and the plans of fraudsters for the sons(!) of men(!).
|The dust or smoke screen had served its purpose, as
far as the author of the article and the editor of 'The Sun' were concerned. Both had
served the puppeteers objectives 'FOOL the sucker serfs with anything you can, that
is what you are here for'
No need for the public to know of the
realities and the DESTRUCTION OF FAMILIES AT WILL as we cover in our pages, by
the manipulative* and the criminals** ( [*L]
who are in control in an alleged Democracy; an allegedly civilised society resting and
founded, allegedly on principles of Law & Order. [*Link [**L]
to another page / case history example].
*Link from here to the page where we cover aspects of the solicitors
activities in organised fraud as in the case of the FORGERY we point to in this page
The condescending accessories and promoters of
CIUKU Enterprise, from within the media, always ready to serve any half baked
potatoes to the citizens they are meant to be informing with THE FACTS, in an allegedly
civilised democracy. Acting as the puppets who dangle on the strings of the puppeteers,
serving the the false states promoting the imposed pseudo-democracies is but their main
ACCESS the events we reported to the
government in March 2002* [*L].
Ensure that you DO READ the facts covered in the page we link you to. Bear in mind that
the actress who had been engaging in the scenarios we covered, was married to a police
officer and that she was an accessory to constructive frauds through the usual
scams and theatrical productions in the courts*. [Access [*L] in another page and read parts of the
affidavit which the lousy actress never reported to the authorities or challenged at
court. Thereby she betrayed her parts and overriding role in the blunt &
arrogant constructive frauds on the taxpayers : Mr & Mrs Average]. Note
the facts reported / stated in both pages and then consider what was reported in
'The Sun' on 7th March 2002* [*L],
the day after the actress received a very clear fax* [*L],
about her parts in the blunt & arrogant constructive frauds at and through the courts
created / enacted.
Who but the senior officer retained,
instructed and meant to be investigating the 'untouchables' came up with the utterances
which 'The Sun' was praising him for?
The senior officer DID NOT come up with
anything leading to prosecutions of any of the criminals who are in control of the courts
and the court services. Yet he was presented as a courageous and brave hero, by 'The Sun'!
He accepted a knighthood and took over from
the departing Commissioner of the Metropolitan Police, Sir Paul Condon, who
received plenty of communications about the FORGERIES that were used to misappropriate and
steal HOUSING BENEFIT funds belonging to others, as organised by the staff
and officers at Haringey Council and Enfield Council in North London, also at Hackney
Council in East London. All and everything with the blessings of the Metropolitan Police,
all the way to the Office of the Commissioner and blunt participation in the scams by the
staff and officers within the Local Authorities the Local County Courts. [*Link from here to the page where we released the Appeal that caused
the government to announce the Bill of Rights while the many charlatans and stooges who
contacted us (allegedly because they wished to challenge and expose the rampant fraud
ongoing in and imposed through abuse of the courts facilities) shoved their heads in the
sand or congregate in the caves where they hatched and hatch up their plans HOW TO
OBSTRUCT & CONSPIRE(D) TO DISCREDIT ANY GENUINE CHALLENGERS and how best to secure
ongoing fraudulent gains from the processes they fell in love with, and signed up to, as
fraudsters-club-recruits / maintenance engineers of the system of operations].
THEFTS and CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUDS ORGANISED
BY THE STAFF & OFFICERS OF THE LOCAL AUTHORITY that was meeting and meets the salaries
of police officers who do not serve the victims of crime but through defaults and
omissions they ensure the criminals flourish and multiply. [*Link].
NOTE OUR FAIR COMMENTS and read the evidence
that we point you to. DO NOT FAIL to access the above link/page and IF you
really wish to know of the facts of life, as organised for the citizens by the controllers
of CIUKU Enterprises, access the site where the mother of the young lady (to whom we
dedicated this web-site) publishes which parties and who responsible for
what in that tragic scenario. DO NOT FAIL TO NOTE THAT THE CRIMINAL WAS SERVED by the
criminals in control of the police, the Coroners' office and the Magistrates Courts staff
and officers. [*Link]
WE PUBLISH in our pages information on
developments which THE CITIZENS / VICTIMS can use when challenging the offenders who
breach the law and violate the citizens rights through abuse of office and blunt
misconduct in / at Court. More often than not the citizens are unaided because 'the
organisers of the system' SO ARRANGE and HAVE CREATED FOR THEIR victims [*Link to list, of some].
A typical case / scenario can be accessed in
our pages [*Link directly to page]. The victims of banking
fraud, Harry & Carole Roffey are preparing their own pages and web-site; just another
example of the rampant fraud and corruption which, if not instigated at and by the courts,
nonetheless approved and endorsed by ALL PUBLIC SERVANTS. Public Servants, who are in fact
retained to serve the citizens and to protect them from crime and criminals, in fact
ENDORSE AND PROMOTE THE ACTIVITIES AS PERFECTLY NORMAL. The VICTIMS / CITIZENS WERE
SUBJECTED TO BLUNT CRIMINAL ACTS, and within the public servants' own code of morals and
their knowledge of 'the law' such activities were/are normal and acceptable. [*Link to an exclusive page where we challenge the content of a
judgement (transcript) by way of a SKELETON ARGUMENT as settled by Mr. Andrew Yiannides
the founder of human-rights (NGO) for and on behalf of victims of FRAUDULENT IMPOSITIONS
BY BANK STAFF & OFFICERS].
Among the promoters, persons who operate from
within the COURTS IN JUDICIAL CAPACITIES. Persons from within the Law Enforcement Agencies
acting in contempt of the evidence and the law and recklessly breach their public duties.
Read the skeleton argument, attached to an
appeal. Victims who do read it, should recognise 'the usual scenarios and scripts from the
legal circles' and above all, the defaults by judicial chair occupants who abuse and
misconduct in public office.
Of such material and 'facts of life within an
allegedly civilised society / state, that allegedly which we settled and published
covering precisely the arrangements by the criminals who are in control of the citizens'
rights in law. The CAP's (Citizens
Alternative Precedents, proposed by our founder in 1981 through The
CAMILA Project,* are well intended. ALL
VICTIMS Of the TRIAD, SHOULD and MUST participate in a true DEMOCRATIC SPIRIT). The state,
through Parliament should also recognise the need for changes. IT MUST DO its best to
assist us in our efforts to bring about TRUE, UNHINDERED, UNADULTERATED, UNBIASED and
UNBLEMISHED JUSTICE in the United Kingdom. The MEDIA should cease shoving the facts and
the attached evidence in the family closet and stop promoting the plans hatched up in
secret sessions with the self appointed dictators, whose greed and pseudo-interest in
mankind the editors and their subordinates turn a blind eye to, just as they stay as
blind, as deaf and as dumb as the persons who were responsible for the issues that caused
the Daily Mirror to come up with such views on 22 May 1992.
THE MOTTO for all from within
"Preach not to others,
simply PRACTICE WHAT YOU PREACH"
|*Link from here
to an explicit quote by the French Jurist Charles Louis Montesquieu
The Law and rules of court, in any CIVILISED SOCIETY /
STATE provide FOR THE PROTECTION OF society as a whole, just as for the individual citizen.
|*Link from here to explicit rules of court provisions
|* In that instance the offending solicitor and the band of renegades
from the law, the solicitor was co-operating with, happened to be an old school chum of
the victim of fraud - the Plaintiff. One could not get a more real 'Bleak House' situation
than Charles Dickens' 'literary work'.
|*Link from here to our exclusive page where we point to realities
and realisations born of studies and research the victim of fraud engaged in, as of a
young age. Read the specific material -article from the UK Hellenic 'The News' weekly-
and note >in the smae page< the alternative caption to the cartoon as
suggested by Andrew Yiannides to the editor of the 'Daily Mail', some years before the
article in 'The News' exposed the solicitor Kypros Nichola, the
victim's old school friend and solicitor >to have been / be a Freemason<.
The solicitor, as member of the Brotherhood with secretive plans for mankind, did expose
himself to have been a proactive criminal as of the moment he set about promoting the >blunt
FORGERY we publish in this page< as acceptable evidence in support of a
concocted Defence in the matter of the commercial fraud. The solicitor's connection to the
Brotherhood simply confirmed the obvious to anyone who gets to know of the fact that the
Brotherhood relates to and is most proactive in promoting and using the old testament as
intended by the creators, their successors, by the indoctrinated and the conditioned
followers of the vile scenarios born of and attached to the old testament rubbish; the
rubbish promoted as alleged holy scriptures for some 2300 years. The Brotherhood also busy
promoting itself as holder / keeper of alleged 'secret Gnosis'. Intriguiging indeed,
the connection of 'the Brotherhood equipped with secrets', and gnosis attached to the
'scripts and scenarios of the old testament', which the victim of the commercial fraud,
discarded as of his pre-teen years as vile, after determining the alleged holy scriptures
were nothing but the creations of evil minds, by criminals who set about promoting their
creations with fraudulent intentions.
|* The practices by the legal circles led Mr. Andrew Yiannides to
coin:- "The self-perpetuating
cancerous growth industry"©.
One has only to consider the routine directions offered to the citizens, pardon 'the
serfs', by their representatives in government: "See a solicitor". Such advise from within an alleged
Christian state and nation where the sovereign happens, also, to be 'the protector of the
faith', a direct hint to the rivers of blood !
|*Link from here to rights assured
*Link from here
to principles of law in true Democratic States
|*Link from here to the words of Oliver Cromwell, George
Washington & Thomas Jefferson
* No one should benefit at the
expense of any other 'without due process of AND STRICT ADHERENCE TO THE LAW, administered
by (presumed and or assumed) experts / honourable individuals.
|*Link from here
to an appeal when Pleading the 'assured rights for due process' & when
'appropriate' challenges to the staff in the Lord Chancellor's office caused the abusers
of the courts facilities to review, of their own, that which they had indulged in, in
contempt of the law and rules of court. Visitors are urged to read the whole of the
appeal document, in order to familiarise themselves with the extent of the abuse of public
office and the reckless denials or rights BY judicial chair occupants in that instance
In the HomePage the founder's conclusions, in 1975,
consequential to 6 years of frustration because of the rampant free for all in the legal
system, as operated by the legal circles. From solicitors, through the barristers 'via the
independent, of the law, judicial chair occupants and 'the police part and parcel of the
Organised Crimes Against 'the serfs'.
|*Link from here to the founder's
conclusions in the Home Page
|*Link also from here to the evidence in the
left panel / window in this page
* Developments & activities by and from within the
legal circles, the courts and the police maintained by the state,
led to the conclusions : 'The rule of law non-existent' as
Charles Louis Montesquieu determined centuries ago. One needs to consider carefully
what his words implied, however.
|*Link from here to our QUOTES page and
read his conclusions
"CIUKU Enterprises" was born as a
result of the realisation of how, why and what for, one of the best, if not the best,
legal system in the world is used by the criminals in control of the citizens' rights and
lives in a pseudo-democracy where the media barons and the Intellectual Prostitutes they
retain and maintain simply SUPPRESS THE TRUTH OF ANY MATTER their masters or the secret
orders / brotherhoods they join so instruct them to do.
|*Link from here to an element
from material that was first published in 1902 in Russia and has long since been argued to
have been a false instrument by the alleged circles to which the creation of such evil
ploys was attributed by the promoter.
Advise from the Blind, the Deaf & the Dumb who choose
to ignore, that which their constituents take / refer to them. For almost 2000 years the
words of The Great Teacher ignored and the reasons behind it all, the very issues that
Oliver Cromwell accused 'the deputies of the people' of: - 'greed and corruption'.
>PRECISELY what the legal circles, the police serve and promote trhough their
actions and convenient defasults at all material times relying on abusers of judicial
chair occupation to endorse the criminal activities AS HAPPENED when the two LJs Orr and
Buckley entertained the criminals activities of the solicitors and the barristers acting
for both teams in the case Yiannides -v- Radley Gowns Ltd.
An illiterate from within the Lord
Chancellor's Department, in 1995,
exposed institutionalised attitudes towards 'the serfs', the taxpayers.
- The letter, on the right, establishes the simple
fact that judicial chair occupants indulge in contempt of the law they
were / are retained to serve and uphold
- The author of the letter, as a trained promoter of
the usual waffle, simply acted as all Public Servants(?) are instructed in & used
for... 'to promote the freedom of judicial chair occupants to act in contempt of all law
and thus protect the criminals in control'.
- Apparently THE MINISTER for Justice IS NOT, IN ANY
WAY the SUPREMO & HEAD of the Justice System, the courts and the persons who are retained
and appointed by his office to serve Justice, the Law and to protect / uphold the citizens
at law, in general.
- Evidently accountability
for wrong doing is not part of 'the arrangements in place for the management of CIUKU
Enterprises. [*Link to a brief legal argument that rests on relevant law.
It applies in most, if not, all cases when judicial chair occupants act as the transcript
and the FORGERY CREATED & USED in the case we point to above
sucker-serfs who bothered to consider the realities pointed to in this page are hereby
requested to READ THE ARROGANT DECLARATION by the judiciary, in the United Kingdom [*L] whereby they are free / let loose by parliament, in an
allegedly civilised Democracy, TO DENY RIGHTS ASSURED IN LAW to the sucker-serfs, to the
citizens who have taxes imposed on them for the maintenance of fraudsters and criminals in
public office. Reference to the response from the Lord Chancellor's private office as the
authoress of the letter released in the public doamain (image of which above) asserts
simply confirms the reliance on one and all to rely on the blunt and asrrogant abuse of
the courts facilities. ALL VISITORS / READERS SHOULD CONSIDER the arrogance of the Lord
Chancellor who received a true copy of THE FORGERY PROCURED & PROMOTED BY THE LEGAL
CIRCLES (image below) and thereat consider Andrew Yiannides' conclusions that the serfs /
the sheeple of the United Kingdom are subjects to the whims of the corrupt, the corrupters
and the corrupted as Andrew discovered care of the many who contactd him over the long
span of 19 years and the many who atteched themslves to him as alleged victim-challengers
whom we expose in explicit web-pages [*L].
Below page from a transcript,
exposes arrogance & contempt for the law.
- The page, from a transcript, pertaining to a Court of Appeal
hearing. TWO Lord Justices Orr & Buckley) entertaining an invitation to deny 'justice
to a victim of FRAUD. (*F2)
- Relying on waffle aplenty and the use of a Forgery (image below) in order to introduce FALSE INSTRUMENTS [*Link from here to clarification in law] THROUGH ABUSE OF JUDICIAL CHAIR OCCUPATION, and contempt for the
law, FOR THEIR PART and arrogant complicity in perversion and blunt corruption of Justice.
- Blunt contempt of the Law, as the legal circles organised
for the occasion and as their training and established
practices 'do evince' in myriad of cases up and down the country. [*Link to the images of the 1913
Forgery Act - click on image / page 4 & read the section relevant to courts]
- The evil in control aiding, abetting and protecting one another as they climb the ladder of the CIUKU
Enterprises, ranks of managerial 'echelons' of the protection racket, as maintained and
promulgated by seasoned criminals.
- All in the interest of wealth creation through crime
founded and resting on abuse of public office. READ the waffle from their Lordships as
they chose to serve criminals and crime, care of the much revered Independence of the
judiciary from the restraints of Parliament's Law. [*Link
from here to the foundations for truly Democratic states
and the rights assured to their citizens under national law & international treaties
- Everyone who looked and looks at the document, below, can
spot the altered date. But their Lordships ignored it all, including a contemporaneous
letter where the original fraudster wrote to categorically state that such a document, as
the one their Lordships were looking at, did not exist, hence the issue of
'contemporaneous evidence' = AT THE TIME OF THE EVENTS, when the fraud was indulged into
by the defendants.
- Offering invisible services to CRIMINALS was & is the
name of their game. As in other cases, the activities within the legal circles and the
courts are systematically ignored by the police and Ministers.
- Needless to say the Law Society & The Bar Council, as
indifferent and unconcerned as the abusers of public office. All relying on judicial chair
occupants to absolve them of all indiscretions and foul of the law activities. (*F4)
Page from the transcript
Experts at & servants of the law acting in contempt
of it, AS INVITED by the fraud of a barrister who submitted to court a concocted Defence
in support of an open and shut case of Commercial FRAUD. The same fraudster also invited
the court, through an affidavit he endorsed, to act in breach of their public duties, and
in contempt of the law. Of such activities breaches of the Judicial
document did not exist at the time of the events that gave rise to the institution of the
High Court proceedings. THREE YEARS LATER it was procured / created by the criminals
who relied on the criminals in the Law Enforcement Agencies, the courts and the police to
misconduct in public office. PERVERTING JUSTICE is the game of such hardened
criminals who benefit from practice certificates by the 'godfathers of all crime'. The
promoter of the forgery / false instrument was deemed to be QC material and later he was
rewarded OR benefited from an appointment to a judicial chair occupancy within the
commercial division at, the RCJ, naturally [*Link from here to our definition for RCJ and consider the above
only has to look at the date to NOTE THAT IT HAD A LITTLE COSMETIC ENHANCEMENT for
improvement . Yet the experts at law who receive their fat salaries to deal with crime and
criminals just ignored the provisions of the THEFT ACTS. Visitor if you have not read
the introduction to this page, DO SO NOW.
||THE BLUNT FORGERY
With compliments to ALL of the fraudsters club recruits
Their Lordships, were holding the forgery above in their hands with their eyes (physical and
mental) closed, apparently. Marvel at how blind the judiciary can choose to be when they
serve crime & criminals and NOT the law as successive governments promote and assert
with arrogant tongue in cheek mentality in the U.K.
The copy of the
letter below covers the jest of the commercial transaction
- READ how the criminal / fraudster was cornered and
trapped before proceedings were instituted.
- The only way the fraudster could get out of the
situation was to retain criminals who were well connected* [*Link] in order to benefit from the invisible services that
are on offer at and through the courts by the managers of Crimes Incorporated
The confirmation, below, is dated
5th February 1970.
|The content very clear:
Further to your letter of 3rd February please be advised that style 3830/40/42/2397
was cancelled by our committee and agreed upon by Radley Gowns on October 10th.
|IMPORTANT ELEMENT TO NOTE : - The style reference number was
hand-written, as was the date when completing the spirtograph / stencil printed form, by
the person who provided / procured the above document. The numbers 0 & 7 as used for
the style reference number provided the additional evidence as to the FORGERY of the FALSE
INSTRUMENT & only idiots or criminally motivated fraudsters could rely on the passing
of the DOUBLE FORGERY a s genuine. ONLY PERSONS WHO WERE PROVIDING INVISIBLE
SERVICES TO CRIMINALS WERE RELIED UPON TO INDULGE IN THE USUAL MANNER, as the victim of
all discovered after years of research and investigations as to the Legal & Court
Services maintained in a pseudodemocracy.
above letter qualifies also that C&A Modes operated through a protected system of
commercial activities. Note the references to the fact that a committee and not a
single person was responsible for purchase and order placing / processing, thus
removing the element of corrupt(ed) agents abusing office and position.
- COULD ANYTHING HAVE BEEN CLEARER?
- Especially when checked against all other
contemporaneous and documented evidence?
- JUDGES OFFERING INVISIBLE SERVICES TO
CRIMINALS for the creation of the society of their choice WAS / IS IN THE ORDER OF THE
DAY. [*Link from
here to a page where we apply our knowledge of historical realities, stated and
covered in published material which NO ONE CAN IGNORE or carry on misrepresenting as the
criminals who HAVE BEEN & ARE IN CONTROL have engaged in for far too long].
- And the exclusive page we point to from
here covers HOW THE SYSTEM HAS been operating through persons who, through abuse of public
office, condition Mr. & Mrs. Average, 'the serfs', to endorse the rampant fraud
through the abused courts' facilities, as covered in the page. [*Link from here to the page covering
the facts of life in our allegedly civilised pseudo-democracy].
- GREED and personal gain at the top of
their agenda. [*Link
to a page where one such person wrote of the parts such fraudsters engage in as
alleged legal gurus, who operate in the courts in much the same manner as the solicitors].
- The very elements the motivating forces
for the multitude of stooges, charlatans and fraudsters club recruits who were sent along,
as initiates, to play at and with craft-y elements they benefit from as the tutored,
guided & USED bricks-n-mortar for the building (note the words)
of societies that are organised and managed by the followers of the Great Architect,
the alleged creator of all and everything.
The 'food for thought' news item, below, should awaken the naive & gullible
- "A judge and a solicitor have
been arrested by detectives investigating allegations of corruption in a number of
- The Department of Constitutional Affairs is called
upon to authorise one of its Senior Officers to inform us and the press IF the Department
is to carry on promoting the usual rubbish about judicial chair occupants not being
'subject to the restraints of law'.
||The Headlines say it all.
Readers & Researchers should access the legal argument
founded and resting on provisions of the Theft Acts
1968 / 78
*The challenge to the authorities, with our
compliments to the managers and organisers of the LIPS crowd / mob, the fraudsters club
recruits who contacted Andrew soon after the explicit Appeal was lodged at Bow County
Court in May 1992. Also to their like-minded affiliates and associates who operate out of
similarly organised groups as alleged challengers of the ARROGANT FRAUD THROUGH THE COURTS
IMPOSED ON THE TAXPAYERS, when nothing could be further from the truth]
Anyone around, police
or Member of Parliament, still ready to promote the usual rubbish about judicial chair
occupants 'not subject to the restraints of law' when indulging in criminal activities in
the purported execution of their public duties?
*Link from here
to the page where we point to and cover the overriding and undeclared rules of practice
used by criminals who misrepresent themselves as alleged officers / administrators of the
law in allegedly civilised Democratic States
The arrogance of abusers of trust is EVINCED in the invitation
to the judiciary, who are independent of and free from the restraints of the law they are
meant to serve, in accordance with the evidence, which evidence in the case stated /
pointed to here was of no interest or concerns to the two blind, deaf and dumb morons;
they simply served other plans by entertaining the invitation from the criminals who
settled and submitted their invitations to abusers of judicial chairs occupation with the
blessings of the police, Ministers and the media in the mother of all PSEUDOdemocracies.
On the right PROOF of invitation to
the judges to deny rights assured in Law, allegedly, to ALL citizens in the UK,
under the European Convention, also the UN Charter and numerous International Treaties
& Accords, without discrimination on any grounds, unless, of course, the
administrators of the law elect to serve other 'undeclared interests & or superiors
authorities command of such persons, as each and every one established in the instance at
hand, the case pointed to here.
*Link from here to
the invisible service provided by two condescending Lord Justices who acted in
contempt of the evidence & Parliament's Law as evinced in the part of the transcript
we reproduce, image of, endorsed with a hint / invitation to the abusers of judicial chair
The Rules of the Supreme Court we
refer to, provided:
Under 18/8/4: "It
is the duty of counsel, not to enter a plea of fraud on the record
".... unless he has clear and sufficient evidence to support it". (see
per Lord Denning in 'Associated Leisure Ltd. -v- Associated Newspapers Ltd.  2 Q.B.
450 at p. 456]. Any charge of fraud or misrepresentation must be pleaded with the
utmost particularity. "In the Common Law Courts no rule was more clearly settled
than that fraud must be distinctly alleged and as distinctly proved, and that it was not
allowable to leave fraud to be inferred from the facts".
Solicitors in the
first instance received full particulars and they proceeded to state the facts and
delivered the submitted documented evidence to counsel. Counsel then settled and pleaded
the specific fraud, in a commercial / business contract, as stipulated under the rules, in
other words 'the evidence existed to support the claim for fraud. WHEN the two of them
subsequently entertained and promoted the blunt forgery, as allegedly legitimate evidence,
in support of a concocted Defence that never was (in the mode used by Lord Jeffrey Archer
of recent years) fraud ceases to be a pleading but a realisation that the practitioners
themselves are the biggest fraudsters going in our allegedly civilised society, a society
that allegedly is founded and rests on law and order. In the instance we refer to here
THERE WAS NO LAW but contempt of it by the very individuals the victim of fraud retained
for recovery of his 'rights as assured and secured by law'.
Mr Galpin, Counsel who settled the pleadings BENEFITED FROM
ALL THE EVIDENCE. He elected to suppress very material facts and he was noted to have been
a promoter and user of the forgery we point to.
|MOST IMPORTANT ELEMENT
READERS SHOULD NOTE: Barrister / Counsel retained and instructed by Mr. Kypros Nicholas
>the solicitor< did recklessly suppress from the pleadings he settled, the fact that
the evidence furnished to the licensed criminals included proof that the claim was
supported by evidence the Defendants could not bury / ignore, simply because the contract
to make up goods for the Defendants related to the making up of additional goods which the
Defendants, acceppted andpaid for AFTER asserting and declaring the goods they had no
client for >because the client cancelled< their order with the Defendants before the
Defendants indulged in fraudulent assertions. The suppressed element, by the licensed
criminals? The fact that the Defendants accepted and paid for the remainder of the made up
goods. The visitor / reader can draw his or her mind as to WHY THE LICENSED CRIMINALS
>the legal boffins< SUPPRESSED SUCH FACTS & INESCAPABLE EVIDENCE.
|Under 18/9: "Subject to rules 7 (1), 10 and 15 (2),
a party may IN ANY PLEADING plead any matter which has arisen at any time WHETHER
BEFORE OR SINCE the issue of the writ".
The provisions are clear, yet, how many
victims of the legal circles, the operatives of the 'Self Perpetuating Cancerous Growth
Industry' ©, have ever been assisted by the criminals in control to challenge the
activities of the very circles? One only has to refer to the case of the member of the
*human-rights.org * Community On Line* and the pleadings, STATED FACTS as submitted to
the European Court of Human Rights, covering the violations imposed on the victim by
the very circles, within our country [*Link].
When a judge, to all intents and purposes cannot grasp the difference between
"IMPOSED ON THE CLIENT - by the solicitors representing the client" &
endorses a submitted order by the offending solicitors' barrister whereby "there was
NO INFLUENCE on the client, and the judge did indulge so, either as an illiterate in plain
English or as a split personality acting in two diametrically opposed roles while sitting
in a judicial chair what we do have is RAMPANT CORRUPTION through institutionalised &
organised FRAUD on the citizens. The facilities (ARRANGEMENTS FOR THE CITIZENS) are
as clear as can be when one consider the words used under the very same Order and rules of
the Supreme Court [*Link] whereby the outcome
was predetermined by the criminals in control and the actors who sell an allegedly
civilised democracy that allegedly rests and is founded on the rule of law - THE TYPE OF
RULE & LAW we point you to through the above link.
Readers & researchers are urged to
consider the provision qualifying RIGHTS TO PLEAD MATTERS ARISING AFTER THE ISSUE OF THE
WRIT. We will release evidence to the effect that one and all from within the legal
circles and the courts simply act in contempt of the provision.
Under 18/12/11 "Fraud - Para.(1) (b), supra, has
reversed the former O.19 r.22, and it is now provided that the necessary particulars of
fraudulent intention must be contained in the pleading. The pleader should accordingly
set out the facts, matters and circumstances relied upon to show that the party charged
had or was actuated by a fraudulent intention. Fraudulent conduct must be distinctly
alleged and as distinctly proved, and it is not allowable to leave fraud to be
inferred from the facts (Davy -v- Garrett, 7 Ch. D. p. 489; Behn -v-
Bloom (1911), 132 L.T.J.87; Claudius Ash, Sons & Co,. Ltd. -v- Invicta Manufacturing
Co., Ltd.. (1912), 29 R. P. C. 465, H.L). "General allegations, however
strong may be the words in which they are stated, are insufficient to amount to an
averment of fraud of which any Court ought to take notice" (Wallingford
-v- Mutual Society, 5 App. Cas. p. 697; see especially the remarks of Lord Hatherley and
Blackburn, pp. 701, 704.. The acts alleged to be fraudulent must be set out, and then it
must be stated that these acts were done fraudulently, otherwise no evidence in support of
them will be received (Re Rica Gold Washing Co., 11 Ch. D. 36; Redgrave -v- Hurd 20 Ch. D.
1; Smith -v- Chadwick, 9 App. Cas. 187:; Riding -v- Hawkins, 14 P. D. 56;; Lawrance -v-
Noreys, 15 App. Cas. p, 221; But from these acts fraudulent intent may be inferred
(Johnson - Barnes  W. N. 32; Herring -v- Bischoffscheim;  W. N.. 77).
Evidence of similar frauds was admitted where the statement of claim alleged that the
fraud was part of a system (Edinburgh Life Assurance Co. -v- Y.,  1lr. R. 306).
Where the Plaintiff alleged that the entries made by defendant in certain books were
false, he was ordered to identify the false entries and to state in what respect these
entries were false and the nature of the falsehood or fraud alleged in respect of each
item. (Newport etc., Co. -v- Paynter, 34 Ch. Div. 88, C. A. Harbord -v-
Monk, 38 L. T. 411). But the fraud alleged in the pleading, and the fraud disclosed in the
particulars, must be the fraud of the other party to the action, and not of a third person
(Staffordshire Financial Co. -v- Hill (1909), 53 S. J. 446. H. L.) And
see (n) "Concealed Fraud".......
The OBVIOUS no one could overlook, when reading: 'The pleader should accordingly
set out the facts, matters and circumstances relied upon to show that the party charged
(claimed against in civil proceedings when the police default to execute their public
duties as the evidence supports) had or was actuated by a fraudulent intention.
*Link from here to image of part of an affidavit & note how the criminals in control
of the courts' business actually invited a judge to DENY RIGHTS.
|ON OFFER THROUGH The LEGAL CIRCLES,
The POLICE AUTHORITIES,
The COURTS SERVICE &
JUDICIARY IN THE UNITED KINGDOM - blunt & arrogant invisible services.
All and everything in contempt of all Law,
as the founder, Mr. Andrew Yiannides was subjected to by all alleged servants of the Law
& the Public, in an allegedly civilised Democracy wherein the rule of Law rules
We publish above evidence that
Court of Appeal Lord Justices consciously and with intent engaged in the perversion of
justice and denial of rights to a targeted citizen. As we state in other pages, the
activities the legal circles engaged in, over a period of five years were the eye opener
for Mr Andrew Yiannides, the creator of these pages and founder of the human-rights.org.
The fact that the courts, all the way to the Court of Appeal, ENDORSED, AS THEY
STILL DO, CRIMINAL ACTIVITIES by the legal circles; also, the fact that the judiciary
engage and indulge in rampant perversion of justice, caused Mr. A Yiannides to reconsider
his belief in the promotions he had been subjected to by his School Masters at the English
School in Nicosia, Cyprus.[*Link from here to 'background' to human-rights]. The 'RSC
bible' - 1973 edition (from which images in this page) was bought after a solicitor and
barrister advanced and promoted a FORGERY that was procured by the adversaries of the
solicitor's client, nearly three years after the causes of action arose. The solicitor
eagerly promoted the forgery, to his client, as a valid document that allegedly 'supported
a defence the other side settled and served in a case of fraudulent misrepresentations;
the promotion of the forgery two years after the close of pleadings, note.The
aforesaid INSTRUMENT WAS FALSE because the defendants who were to rely on it qualified in
letters that such a document as they procured/created and were promoting three years late,
DID NOT EXIST in the first instance, as they wrote at the relevant time. Evidently,
solicitor and barrister never heard of 'contemporaneous evidence' just as the criminals in
charge of investigating crime, the police. All would have the serfs / taxpayers in the
United Kingdom that none of them knew of the provisions on forgeries and false instruments
intended to be used for the sole purpose of perverting justice. Nearly thirty years on,
Lord Jeffrey Archer, for indulging in a similar and not so obvious / blunt and exercise,
was sent to prison!
In fact the
document and blunt FALSE INSTRUMENT that was introduced years after the events, was even
FORGED after it was created. The criminals changed the date that was endorsed on
the false instrument after realising that the creator, of the false instrument, erred and
wrote the wrong year when creating it. The wrong year and subsequent amendment are as
clear as can be; only a moron or a criminal who was/is party to such activities turns a
blind eye to the obvious and ONLY AN OFFICER OF THE COURT WHO IS OFFERING INVISIBLE
SERVICES TO CRIMINALS ELECTS TO IGNORE SUCH EVIDENCE AND THE LAW APPLICABLE IN SUCH
MATTERS. The solicitors and their clients who had indulged in fraudulent
misrepresentations, in the first instance, were relying on others, as from the service of
the Writ of Summons and thereafter the time when the FALSE & FORGED
INSTRUMENT WAS INTRODUCED to promote and bring to fruition their new fraudulent
NOTE: In fact they carried on
relying on other criminals, the legal team of the targeted victim, to PROMOTE THE FORGERY
AS A DOCUMENT ACCEPTABLE IN EVIDENCE FOR AND IN THE CASE. And both legal teams thereafter
were relying on abusers of public office, from court staff to JUDGES, TO MISCONDUCT IN
PUBLIC OFFICE in order to pervert and corrupt justice. Contempt of and for Parliament's
Law, in the order of the day, as one recognises and gets to know of, through contact with
the Law Enforcement Agencies and the legal circles, in our country.
From the solicitors, allegedly acting for the victim of fraud, through to the police and the judiciary,
all playing their parts in constructive frauds at and through the courts. There followed
arrogant impositions of obstruction and perversion of justice. In the above stated case
the solicitors, failed to influence their client to abandon the claim / claims against the
offenders. The legal circles thereafter indulged at the targeted client's expense while
the police were ignoring the forgery, copy of which was handed to them. The police
themselves were party to additional criminal activities while the legal circles engaged in
compound frauds at and in the courts, such as the creation and promotion of false
instruments such as allegedly legitimate Court Orders created by / issued by fraudsters
who failed to address the issue of the forgery. WHEN Judicial chair occupants lend
themselves to blunt corruption and perversion of Justice, in contempt of all law and
evidence, with THE BLESSINGS OF THE POLICE, while a case was progressed all the way to the
Court of Appeal. What the citizen was faced with was blunt and arrogantly ORGANISED -
INSTITUTIONALISED FRAUD & CORRUPTION THROUGH THE COURTS.
|*Link from here to a
case when the solicitors IMPOSED on their client an agreed settlement. The client who had
been intimidated and blackmailed to 'accept' the imposed settlement (as agreed between the
legal teams), subsequently challenged it all on being told of the rights breached. The
client, in that case, also uncovered secret, undisclosed and suppressed issues that
amounted to another typical scenario as enacted by the legal circles with the blessings of
judicial chair occupants. TYPICAL OF THE CRIMINALS occupying judicial chairs, the
victim of all was denied justice and the participation of all public servants all the way
to the European Court of Human Rights; the last scenario offering additional
evidence in support of the declaration at the top of most of our pages' [*F6]
FOOTNOTE common to most
web-pages at this website
MOST IMPORTANT:- In October 2010, the coalition
Government's Attorney General, in an interview published by 'COUNSEL' the mothly
legal banter magazine, specifically spoke of the police distancing themselves
from cases of (small-fry) fraud and he asserted that he
was making that element his department's priority*
*Link from here
to the evidence.
|IT REMAINS TO BE SEEN, WHAT the coalition of the Con-LibDems, THE
GOVERNMENT OF THE DAY WILL IN FACT ATTEND TO THE RAMPANT FRAUD, and IF IT WILL DEAL
with the criminals who abuse public office, especially when faced with
appropriate submissions and claims that will be delivered in due course.
Visitors/readers are urged to read the article published in the London Evening Standard,
as settled by the Rt. Hon. David Blunkett, Home Secretary in 2003
|*Link from here
to the article we reproduce in another webpage and consider "Why tolerate the arrogance of the legal circles who had
and have the audacity to assert to the lawmakers that they, the lawmakers have nothing to
do with the law"?
|While there, above it, the explicit letter to ex-Minister, the Rt. Hon.
Frank Field MP, delivered a few days earlier. ALL alleged victim-challengers who contacted
Andrew Yiannides, by the time the letter was sent to the Minister, received copy of the
letter just as they received copies of other letters submitted to government maintained
Ministers and other official appointees to public office. Accessing the material pointed
to from the letter (URLs) is of utmost importance. It should assist 'recognition of the
citizen's rights at work', when called upon properly in truly democratic states. The above
in 2003; there were other 'submissions' and among such civilised and, within the law,
approaches by citizens that led to the right actions by governments, the explicit
challenges when we set about exposing one of the most evil of alleged victims of the legal
circles to have ever contacted us.
*Link from here to our explicit submissions to
(a) the Prime Minister, (b) the Chancellor / Treasury, (c) and, the Home Secretary. We
acted so after we had secured more than enough evidence about the parts of an alleged
victim whose only interests were (i)
the rewards under the table FOR KEEPING QUIET about the ORGANISED FRAUD THROUGH ABUSE
OF THE COURTS' FACILITIES and (ii) her
parts in blunt attempts that were intended to discredit the person she was sent along to
mess about with, Mr Andrew Yiannides.
|Access please the letter to the Home Secretary, the Rt. Hon. Jack Straw,
in December 1998
*Link from here
to the letter
|& note the results
evinced in the newspaper article (Hornsey Journal) also within days of the letter reaching
its destination. Many the charlatans and stooges -lovers and 'promoters of the system as is'- on the
job for decades; one and all acting as sold souls always do
*Link from here
to the evidence we point to relative to the parts of one of a number of sold to the system
fraudsters who were sent along / introduced to Andrew Yiannides by the managers /
organisers of the LIPS crowd / mob..
We always point(ed) persons who contact(ed) us, either
as directed by others or of their own, to the fact that the founder of the
human-rights.org Mr Andrew Yiannides never endorsed the blunt constructive frauds through
the abused courts' facilities'. We cover, in our exclusive page*, the
arrogant arrangements in place for rampant fraud on the taxpayers, and visitors who have
not accessed the material, should do so without fail [*Link from here to solid evidence]. Mr Andrew Yiannides, the creator of this web-site and founder of
the *human-rights* (organisation on line) turned down a number of offers and
invitations to join the world of the corrupters and the corrupted simply
because the practices within the courts (as organised by the legal circles and taken to
fruition by abusers of judicial chair occupation) amount to gross abuse of the
courts facilities for conversion of assets targeted, including use of TAX REVENUE FOR
THE 'REWARDS to victims of the practices who convert to silent supporters, maintenance
engineers & front line users of the practices, as covered and exposed in
the exclusive page which victims(!) and the media barons have shoved in the dark corners
of their 'blank minds' and their mentality towards the taxpayers who are called upon to
pay taxes for the maintenance of such facilities in an allegedly civilised
pseudodemocracy; a state where SUPPRESSION OF THE TRUTH & PROMOTION OF FALSE STATES
ARE THE FOUNDATION & THE CORNER STONE UPON WHICH ALL IS FOUNDED & RESTS. [*Link1 - *Link2 - *Link3 - *Link4]
More often than not the placing of appeals for hearing before TWO ONLY court of
Appeal LJ's is used as a smokescreen for undisclosed end-products in such
scenarios. On occasions when appellants were informed of / challenged with the
implications they were reported to Mr Andrew Yiannides to have 'benefited from the
granting of a hearing before a full panel, THREE Lord Justices. On the 'alleged
occasions' Mr Yiannides was NOT invited to the 'hearings promoted, conveniently, by third
parties and not the alleged challengers!!! One of the instances when such
promotions were spoken of, the 'appellant and his affiliates / associates miraculously
failed to invite Mr Yiannides to 'the promoted venue' - theatrical productions in closed
circuit, and targeted sucker-victims invited to such venues, in order to impress them with
the facilities intended to lead to the rewards under the table, to conversion of the
targeted to *fraudsters club recruits*. We point and link from here to the scenarios attached to the promotions
through the press / media in respect of the saga created for and in the Geoffrey Harold
Scriven DIVORCE CASE. We inform visitors / readers that such promotions came our way
after we pointed the fact that the scenario / presentations in February 2000, before
two Lord Justices ONLY (besides other elements) AMOUNTED TO MORE THAN A QUESTIONABLE VENUE',
simply because RULINGS FROM SUCH VENUES DO NOT CONSTITUTE precedent cases that
can, reliably, be used in/for other 'presentations, submissions & arguments at court'.
*Access from here the page where we
publish a letter from an abuser of the trust he was permitted to benefit from while he
was being assisted; get to know of the fcat that he was under investigation all the while,
peruse diligently the links we use to point to his wilful and foul of the law
activities, observed and noted by the person who guided him how to secure
recordings of proceedings in order to benefit from unadulterated and factual 'records' of
hearings at court. NOTE the elements that arose at the time prior to and at the time
when Mr Norman Scarth wrote the letter that merited ALL OF THE
OBSERVATIONS & SUBMISSIONS / CHALLENGES we realte in our pages. Andrew Yiannides had
no option but to address and deal with the unacceptable misrepresentations many indulge
in, in view of Mr Scarth's and his associates (from within the LIPS crowd/mob) who were
noted to be operating as maintenance engineers, as promoters and as users of /
beneficiaries from the spoils of the criminal activities instigated, promulgated,
processed and executed through abuse of the courts facilities we cover in the exclusive
web-page not one of the corrupted fraudsters ever addressed. Mr Scarth, his associates
-from within the LPS crowd/mob- and their affiliates were fully aware of the fcat that
Andrew was very familiar with the criminal activities and conversant with their parts as
maintenance engineers of thje system of operations in the courts. Access also from here the page where we published the two
pages from a transcript Mr Norman Scarth created (as he had been guided to secure from
judicial chair occupants). Read the content of the 2 pages, recognise the elements
of interest and WHY we published only the 2 pages and not the rest of the hearing before a
full bench of the Court of Appeal at the RCJ, London. NOTE, however that for
years the only elements we published were the two images with an introduction as to who
secured the permission to record the hearing and who created the transcript while we were
expecting of Mr Scarth (as a person who had agreed to act as webmaster for the Community
on Line for the County of Yorkshire and the city of Leeds. As a committed to the system as
is & as a convert to the abuse of the courts facilities for rampant fraud on the
taxpayers (pointed to in the exclusive page) he failed to ever refer to issues raised or
address the content of the exclusive page, covering as it did and does the criminal
activities he and his associates with their affiliates had fallen in love with and
converted to maintenance engineers of the rampant fraud on the taxpayers.
4. *Access from here a page where we publish material facts and
realities born of a case when THEFT of Housing Benefit funds owing to owners of private
properties was the name of the INSTITUTIONALISED FRAUD & CORRUPTION of
new Letting Agency staff. Many the cases and many the properties occupied by
the organised influx of refugees and asylum seekers, rushing to the land of milk
and honey. The rush creating the need for funds, LEADING TO THE INSTIGATED by Local
Authorities, their staff and their officers fraudulent misrepresentations to the owners of
properties and thereby the CONSTRUCTIVELY ENGINEERED FRAUDS THROUGH RELIANCE ON THE COURTS
TO PROCESS, to entertain, to endorse and to impose on the helpless properties owners
ARROGANT FRAUD and theft of properties. NOTE: The explicit appeal lodged at
court in the instance we point to, DID CAUSE the government in the United Kingdom
to announce the Bill of Rights, almost 40 YEARS AFTER signing up to the European
Convention on Human Rights.
*July 2011, the Intellectual Prostitutes in the United Kingdom
afforded us the avenues and the means that SOULD PROVIDE all victims of the ORGANISED
ABUSE OF THE COURTS FACILITIES (in fact the abusers of judicial chair occupation) THE WAY
FORWARD. If ever the victims wished, desired to EXPOSE & CHALLENGE OPENLY the abusers
of public office and the courts facilities, their chance and oppportunity was pointed to
by us when the facility for free website space was first created by Andrew Yiannides in
conjunction with the USA corporation that contracted with Andrew to make available such
facilities under the human-rights.org banner. Many the alleged victim challengers who
signed up to the fcailities / provisions and conveniently failed to interlink / connect
with other members for and because of other reasons than the need to challenge and expose
collectively the abusers of the courts facilities as we cover in our pages. Many the
alleged victim-challengers who simply indulged in all manner of promotions to targeted
'newbies' to NEW VICTIMS of the organised abuse of the courts facilities for fraud
aplenty, especially after the new victims joined the human-rights.org Community
on Line. [*Link from here to evidence when such services to the system's
operatives were the main objective of the corrupted]
The URL pointed to from the realities covered above, is presently off line becuase
the beneficiary of the arrangements through the ECtHR so arranged. However, as the
Intellectual Property attached to the submissions to the ECtHR, happens to be owned by
Andrew Yiannides it will be reinstated in due course. We ask visitors / readers and
researchers to access from here the challenges to the Eurpean Court of Human Rights,
when the usual ploy was asserted. Access read and considerthe simple fact that the attempt
and challenge brough about changes and instead of the proposed destruction of thesubmitted
papers perttaining to the case, the papers were rushed by courier back to London. Use grey
matter reader andaskyourself "Why propose the destruction of the papers after a year
was to lapse IF there was no settlement REWARD in the usual manner? Read carefully the
challenges to the carft-y operating from within the ECtHR and then consider2Why did the
victim pass all of the papers pertaining to the case, failed to assign her rights to the
person who should have been allowed to carry on with the false states Andrew Yiannides
challenged IF the victim did not go for the REWARDS UNDER THE TERMS and conditions we
expose her at human-rights.org/confraud.htm#records ?