h-rtitle.gif (7604 bytes)

Crime - Organised - Institutionalised - Corruption - Fraud - Protection Rackets, run and managed by judicial chair occupants, in a free-for-all state of abundance. Note below the arrangements between the administrative, the judiciary and the media; read of the all-embracing guarantee in place, in contempt of all law : the root shall be pointed to.

WHERE IS JUSTICE? Read below:-

"The court has inherent jurisdiction to stay an action which must fail; as, for instance an action brought in respect of an act of State"

*Link from here to founder's tribulations in 1972-75 and marvel at the creativity of allegedly honourable officers of Justice and the Law in the mother of all PSEUDOdemocracies

  • And by extension any act of any public servant who is appointed, retained and maintained by other public servants for all of whom, the state, as employer, is ultimately responsible, including abusers of judicial chair occupancy. Hence, the billions paid out as covered in the affidavit which visitors can link to directly from here [*Link].
  • Link also from here to the founder's conclusions as of 1972-75 when the great Metropolitan police were seen to be nothing but accessories to and abettors of the rampant fraud and corruption through the courts organised and processed to fruition while Members of Parliament were -as they still do- promoting the waffle that amounts to nothing short of:-

'independence of the judiciary to act in contempt of ALL LAW (national and international) in a pseudo-democracy.

*Link from here to proof of the parts the police play in promotion and expansion of the criminal activities instigated, processed and imposed on society by the legal circles. Read of assertions by a typical hypocrite, none other than the Commissioner of the Metropolitan Police, Sir Robert Mark QPM, when he spoke of FALSE RECORDS / FORGERIES by the legal circles while delivering his famous Dimbleby Lecture on BBC-TV in November 1973, 15 months after he received true copy of THE FORGERY advanced and promoted by the licensed criminals : solicitors and barristers for their evil ends in the case that opened Andrew Yiannides' mental eyes to the realities of life in the United Kingdom, a typical PSEUDOdemocracy. Can anyone enlighten Andrew and the millions of victims of the legal circles WHY NO PROSECUTION of the solicitors & the barristers in 1972 or thereafter?.

  • With such a facility in place (the words we point to above) and arrogant abuse of public office, can anyone assert, or argue, that Mr Andrew Yiannides, the founder of human-rights, was not right to determine that Justice has been abducted and that she is held captive in the dungeons maintained by her abductors who rape her daily in their courts? (>Hence the c reation of www.jusaticeraped.org <)
  • ALL Member States of the European Union are subject to the ruling which visitors, readers and researchers can access in the explicit page /yourrights.htm

*Link from here to the realities - in due course also a link to the warning (indirect but nonetheless very clear) for thinkers to recognise 

  • On 3rd March 2008 >someone's birthday< we released a House of Lords PRECEDENT CASE and reveal deliberations by their Lordships in respect of FRAUD - DECEPTION - CONSPIRACY & IMPLIED LIES BY KEEPING SILENT about any wrong imposed on any other.
  • >>> IN THE MEANTIME we have been naming and shaming a number who know of and engage in much more than just approve wrongs imposed on Mr & Mrs Average, the millions of taxpayers, in our allegedly civilised country / state / province / district of the European Union created by politicians, without reference to the taxed for fraud sucker-serfs, allegedly for the benefit of the citizens from FRAUD & CORRUPTION, among other promotions.

Needless to say the case entailed activities and practices by solicitors as Mr Andrew Yiannides was subjected to, decades later, by an old school friend, Mr Kypros Nichola of Nicholas & Co. in London. Mr K. Nichola bluntly abused the trust placed in him and indulged, in tandem with others, in criminal activities intended to cause the damages that were imposed on the targeted 'serf' by accredited - by the Law Society & Bar Council - allegedly Honourable Officers of the Supreme Court, the courts maintained by successive elected governments in the United Kingdom, one of many pseudodemocracies. In due course another revelation relevant to the arrogant 'inherent jurisdiction', through which to deny, obstruct justice & impose all manner of criminally created states on 'the serfs', who are taxed for the cost of maintaining criminals in public office, in pseudo-democracies.

RESPONSIBLE FOR THE STATE OF AFFAIRS, successive irresponsible Lord Chancellors and Home Secretaries who ignored and ignore all complaints and submissions by victims of the organised crimes we point to and expose in our pages, irrespective of the evidence and the law pointed to, by the victims of it all, the citizens who are called upon to pay taxes for the maintenance of criminals in public office.

[*Link from here to our exclusive page, covering confidential fraud as arranged THROUGH THE BEST KEPT OPEN SECRET in alleged democracies, European States. Elsewhere the foundations and corner stone upon which the operatives built the societies of their making using the bricks and mortar we cover in this and other pages. The visitor should not be under any illusion that the stars in the theatrical productions, covered in our pages were by any stretch of the imagination 'humans' who were / are gifted with any attributes that distinguish 'true humans' (>thinkers<) from animals.

Fraud in court  Council staff use Forgeries   Misconduct in Public Office. 2 cases relative to applicable law One Protocol says it ALL It betrays arrogant intentions Law Provides for THEFTS and it covers Judges too Judges' duties   TIME 4 CHANGE   & CHALLENGES Site CONTENTS - Table of Contents & ongoing work Your Rights & OBLIGATIONS to Society SITE SEARCH facility for any specific element / issue of concern to visitors / readers
COURTS : their Facilities Abused For ORGANISED CRIME : FRAUD Solicitor's Perjury & Victim Ignores it all Just like the Law Society always does Blackmailed or is it Just Conditioned & Subjugated Victims who join the club ? We name Lovers of blunt fraud through courts - Users of the facilities 4 illicit gains Local Authorities & FRAUD on 'serfs' the Taxpayers who are kept in the dark Police Party to & Endorsing Criminal Acts, Activities Arrogant Fraud FALSE Records & Contempt of Law by the legal Circles & Public Services The crafty ones & Vexatious Litigant PLOYS for the rewarded silent

* Information FOR victims who wish to co-operate by EXPOSING & CHALLENGING abusers of Public Office *

family.uk-human-rights justiceraped.org dssfraud.htm confraud.htm dadscare.htm contract.htm converts.htm MensAid
solicitorsfromhell.co.uk chancellor.htm theyknow.htm solfraud.htm sheknows.htm 4deceit.htm convicti.htm forward.htm

December 2006 - SUMMONS ISSUED & SERVED IN RESPECT OF FRAUDULENT & RECKLESSLY IRRESPONSIBLE ACTIVITIES & IMPOSITIONS THROUGH THE FAMILY COURTS

*Link from here to evidence. *Link also from here to a case when the abusers of the courts' facilities abandoned their plans for another targeted family

IMPORTANT INFORMATION for all victims of malpractice - misconduct - negligence, etc. TO NOTE

In the civil justice system in England and Wales, a judge presides over the proceedings that are argued by the opposing sides through the adversarial process. The process enables the court, judge, to reach a conclusion as to the truth of the facts in dispute. Thereat it is for the judge to apply the law to the facts proven, established at court.

The system as evolved is covered in the page 'English Legal System' and remains the same after the Woolf reforms.

An explicit Affidavit [*L] plus exhibits and
     letters to a Chief Inspector of Police
[*L],
          one to solicitors
[*L] and another to the Lord Chancellor [*L] evince
               ORGANISED CRIMES
(Access and read the letter to the police in September 2006 [*L])

Access & read from one of a number of letters to the Prime Minister : * I believe that New Labour will deliver us from the wrongs we have been suffering for far too long. Use of our resources in terms of human potential and capabilities can and should be channelled through rights not wrongs, through positives not through negatives. It is our produce and ingenuity we can sell to others not the minefields of corrupt and bankrupt public services. * [*Link from here to the page, note the steps taken to ensure the Prime Minister forwarded / delegated submissions and evidence received at 10 Downing Street to the right Minister / Ministry because the submissions were in respect of ORGANISED CRIMES

3rd March 2011 added link [*L] to the BBC-TV Dimbleby Lecture in 1973 as the Metropolitan Police Commissioner, Sir Robert Mark prepared & presented to the sucker-serfs

...

Page re-designed and updated after an interesting revelation in February 2007. When calling on the telephone a known & pro-active victim of 'the system organised and operated by the abductors & rapists of Democracy & Justice, the pro-active assumed that the caller was the Chief Maintenance Engineer of the system, to whom we refer below. and dedicate this page. No need to inform our visitors that the beneficiary of this dedication had not been a victim of the organised frauds by banking institutions on their clients.

THE CAMILA PROJECT
hosted by *uk-human-rights.org*

( Citizens Against Maladministration In Law Application )

email:- camila@uk-human-rights.org

Victims of the DIVORCE INDUSTRY, the FAMILY COURTS are invited to enquire of the star in this page, Mr Johan Michael Richard Foenander, to state his reasons why he did not proceed with the appeal warranted if he had not agreed already to be party to additional awards to the legal circles, care of the FRAUDULENTLY CREATED COSTS AWARDS to the solicitors representing the solicitors who engaged in fraudulent matrimonial court proceedings, FOR conversion of targeted assets. [*Link below to his part in such matters]

corruptcourts.htm        KEY Page Changes 14 Feb. 2007

Corrupt Courts - Divorce Industry- *page created 27/04/2000*

import.gif (1348 bytes)  HELP US TO HELP YOU Please (*Link to plea).hrbnrsml.gif (1162 bytes)   

JOIN others On Line and publish your Statement of Facts and the Evidence you have. (Member's case at the European Court on Human Rights - paves the way TO PLEAD VIOLATIONS caused through abusive use of the courts in allegedly civilised Democratic States. Victims do not know that IT IS ALL ORGANISED the very circles who have been arranging all of humanity's TRIBULATIONS  FOR THOUSANDS of years) Use your rights in law (link) and ACT, with others, against the offenders. Join them and chip in for the creation of the mass of evidence against abusers of public office : the abductors and rapists of Justice. You can then benefit from THE FACTS & THE EVIDENCE that you will help establish. It can all be used in any action, severally or jointly with others, as the case may be . Crimes against humanity are not ruled out when a large number of citizens can come up with evidence and as victims concur and or expand upon on the FACTS STATED & The VIOLATIONS PLEADED as LODGED at the ECoHR, already.

Affiliated Sites For 'The CAMILA Project' DATA Collection & Activities 
lbduk.org (*Link to update)
MensAid.com (*Link)
part 3

All SERIOUS offers from webmasters who are  engaged in publication of web-pages, web-sites will be welcome. We look forward to adding your site to the above list and your readiness to co-operate in and for data collection.

LIST of leaders of groups and webmasters who REFUSED/FAILED to co-operate. The same also arrogantly FAILED / DEFAULTED to address the issue of Organised abuse of the courts FOR fraudulent conversion of private (citizen's) assets and the fraudulent distribution of taxpayers contributions to the national budget. Access the exclusive exposures where we point to and publish the EVIDENCE of the facilities in place FOR the creation of societies of fraudsters.
1. LIPS (*Site References)
2. UKMM (*Site References) 3. ELC (*Site References)
4. Families Need Fathers
5. Fathers 4 Justice
6. CASIA
7. xxx

A TYPICAL example of the Divorce Industry
war4kids.jpg (174207 bytes)
KEY to Page & Site
Page CHANGES - List 
PERSONALITIES - List
CHARLATANS & STOOGES
FRAUDSTERS CLUB - List 
INTELLECTUAL PROSTITUTES
MAINTENANCE ENGINEERS 
Events & VENUES -  List
Latest/ Page Material - List
Forgeries USED - cases
False Instruments ISSUED
part 3
.
LATEST in this Page - List
FOOTNOTE Great NEWS
2. Judges' NEW MENTALITY
FORGERIES + cases List
4
Page PERSONS - List part 2
Adam & Eve
Lord Justice Denning
HH DJ Maple
HH DJ Rand 
Flori O'Donoghue - barrister
The LIPS crowd / mob
Lord Chancellor - Minister
HH Mr Justice Singer
8.

Johan  M Foenander
Geoffrey H Scriven
Bryan Hudson
Eva & Gerry Adshead
Scriven Changes Camp 
3

Page & Site VENUES - List
Edmonton County Court (*F4)
Hitchin County Court - Frauds
Lambeth County Court 
Royal Courts of Justice (*F5)
ECoHR - Strasbourg Court
Scotland Yard Investigates
Enfield Council - Edmonton
Haringey Council  London
BBC - Documentary
4

CASES - sited - List part 2
Forgeries USED cases - List

False Instruments Issued List
Myers -v- Elan
Adshead v Cumins&Joseph

Nixon -v- Loundes
Regina -v- Dytham CoA
Korytsas -v- Demetri
Lazarus Estates v Beasley
Perry -v- Yiannides
Police Summons Victim
Foenander -v- Foenander
Scriven -v- Scriven 
Hudson -v- Hudson
Zincroft Eng v S Drake Ins.
4. 
Page CHANGES - List
Added Intro. To Appeal  
Links to NEW Pages & Site
Person Venues IDs Added
Add List To Pub. Evidence.
Added FOOTNOTE
Judges Adopt new attitude
+Forgeries False Instruments
CRIMINALS ENTERTAINED
& OR
CRIMINALS CREATED - List

Links to Introduction

1
FRAUDSTERS CLUB - LIST Name Links to Introduction
Beryl Veronica, Foden (Mrs)
Cullinane, Patrick (Mr)
Foden, Veronica Beryl (Mrs)
Johan Michael Foenander
Kellett, Roz (Mrs) (ex CoL)
Marisa Sarda (Mrs)
Maurice Kellett (Mr) 
Maurice Kellett (Mr)
Norman Scarth (Mr)
Roz Kellett (Mrs) (ex CoL)
Sarda, Marisa (Mrs)
Scarth, Norman (Mr)
Veronica Beryl Foden (Mrs)

INTELLECTUAL PROSTITUTES

Name Links to Introduction
.

MAINTENANCE ENGINEERS

Name Links to Introduction
Akene Adoko (Dr.)
Ashok Mahajan (Mr)
Barry Worral (Mr) (UKMM)
Bhopal, Ormila (Miss)
Bryan Hudson (Mr)
Charville, John (Mr)
Foenander, Johan M. (Mr)
Helen Patey (Mrs.)
Hayward, Peter (Mr)
Hudson, Bryan (Mr)
Ian Kelly (Mr) (UKMM)
James Todd of VOMIT repute
John Charville (Mr)
Jones, Roger (Mr)
Johan M Foenander (Mr)
Kellett, Maurice (Mr)
Kelley, Roz (Mrs)
Kelly, Ian (Mr)
Mahajan, Ashok (Mr)
Maurice Kellett (Mr)
Ormila Bhopal (Miss)
Patey, Helen (Mrs) 
Peter Hayward (Mr) (LIPS)
Peter Prankerd (Mr) (LIPS)
Prankerd, Peter (Mr) (LIPS)
Roger Jones( Mr) (LIPS)
Todd, James (Mr) (VOMIT)
Tierney, Anita (Miss)
Worral, Barry (Mr) (UKMM)
x

CHARLATANS & STOOGES

Name Links To Introduction
Anita Tierney (Miss)
Charville, John (Mr)
John Charville (Mr)
Shaun O'Connor (Mr)
O'Connor, Shaun (Mr)
Tierney,  Anita (Miss)
4

FALSE INSTRUMENTS  issued And FORGERIES  used for theft of properties & RIGHTS - List of cases
Antonas -v- Hadjoudj
Constantinou-v-Constantinou
D Englezakis -v- Wijemuni 
Enfield Council-v-ArcadeAcc
Foenander -v- Foenander
Korytsas -v- Demetri
Perry -v- Yiannides
Regina -v- Dytham
V B Foden -v-M.Building Soc.
V B Foden -v- Var. Solicitors
Yiannides -v- Radley Gowns
5
FRAUDSTERS ENTERTAINED
USED FOR FRAUD  
Persons & Facilities

YEARS ON and nothing has changed. The article INDEED VERY CLEAR. What the solicitor disclosed was but the tip of the iceberg. Behind it all, the most vile of activities at the expense of family and the taxpayers. Over and above the financial damages / ruin of families the most evil of effects, the psychological damages that are   imposed on  tomorrows' generations by the legal circles and judicial chair occupants. All paid for through taxes inclusive of 'the social security funding for maintaining the ruined 'serfs' who are targeted by the operatives of the system /   the practices through the courts.
divlawfm.jpg (85442 bytes)
The media barons received details of an explicit case lodged and submitted to the European Court of Human Rights. In that case  the legal circles and the courts were at their best. The facts of life stated very clearly. The blunt violations pleaded / argued, in law, cover all activities the victim was subjected to from within the courts, not just the dishonest lawyers. The Community On Line member published it all in and for the public's interest. [*Link to the FOOTNOTE for the latest - July 2004] 
(Back to:  Cowboy Lawyers  National Scandal: activities of lawyers

Information on other material and pages linked to from this page

Breeding Grounds
 Read of a case when all arrogantly engaged in blatant denial of rights. Court staff and officers, police, the private office of the Lord Chancellor & the department as usual determined that the targeted victim, of all, merited no protection from / under the law because of origins and much more. The same attitude and mentality by and through all ranks from within the Metropolitan Police all the way to the office of the Commissioner.
   Harassment and threat to life, damages to property and much more. And all the Law Enforcement Agencies were prepared to do, was to encourage and harbour a criminal through blunt support and contempt for the rights of the victims. Yet Despite the obstacles & obstinate denial of rights the victim eventually caused the offenders from within the courts to review the errors of their ways. [Link from here to the page where the facts are stated briefly]

Full particulars of the above case were given to the following fraudsters club recruits:
Peter Hayward<> Philomena Cullen
George Kay
Peter Prankerd
Terry Ewing
Panos Koupparis
Roger Jones
Marisa Sarda
David Hunter
James Todd (VOMIT)
Robert Owen
Paul Talbot-Jenkins
Maurice Kellett
Allan Darby
Patrick Cullinane
Nick Haralabidis
William Spring
Norman Scarth
Roz Kellett
Colin Peters
Anita Tierney
Johan Foenander  
Ormila Bhoopaul
Ashok Mahajan 
Bryan Hudson
Veronica Beryl Foden
Jesus Rosalia Baldwin
x
x
undercon.gif (286 bytes) Page Revised: August 04, 2012 :  ADDED links to other pages and to an EXPLICIT HOUSE OF LORDS PRECEDENT CASE relative to CONSPIRACY, DECEIT, LIES, ELECTING TO REMAIN SILENT when aware of damages / caused imposed on another.
Site reconstruction. Ongoing improvements with additional material to pages and new links to existing or new pages .

VISITORS ARE URGED to access and READ THE IMPORTANT update and ADDENDA we were obliged to introduce in January 2002. You will find it at the top of the Updated Pages File. We are sure that you will share with us our concerns and most profound disappointment at and with persons who adopt and promote activities which they know are nothing but downright crimes. We refer to our exclusive page where we expose (as conscientious law abiding citizens) the Confidentiality Between Fraudsters that exists care of the BEST OPEN SECRET. 

Guidelines for Navigating the extensive material: access instructions. In the alternative if looking for any specific issue/issues USE the search facility.  

As part of the reconstruction process our new pages and pages where changes and additions have been or are so to be improved - amended are endorsed with the link 'Page Changes and the date of the last changes. The link takes visitors to a List of the changes implemented in the page. This includes new material and links from relevant paragraphs to other  / new relevant material in other pages. For further clarification email: webmaster@

Divorce Lawyer Admits Fraud

  • The facts of life within our legal SYSTEM.
  • An operative admits to the newspaper "Mail on Sunday" anonymously, for fear of recriminations from within our corrupted system.
  • The person after all needs to make a living, albeit unethically and through deception and fraud as our founder discovered, well over thirty-seven years ago, in a case that was treated by the SYSTEM and its operatives as a goose laying golden eggs for the manipulators of the system [*Link].
  • One only has to consider, in the instance at hand, the fact that one is dealing with FAMILY issues and that the lives of innocent young children are affected by the financial straight jackets their parents are placed in by the greedy fraudsters operating within and in our corrupt courts, as the Scriven case and other cases establish.[*Link from here to an extract from a letter by a targeted 'son of some man to his daughter', *Link from here to challenges that caused the abusers to abandon their plans for a targeted 'son of some man', a discarded dildo / sperm provider for the creation of intended 'gestation vessel families only'].
  • The very dishonest circles, do encourage and *WORK FOR* family break-ups along with their accomplished partners 'in this very important industry' at the forefront and the *Jewel In the Crown* of CIUKU Enterprises.
  • All because of their own greed and their other ulterior motives, irrespective of the effects on society as a whole. [*Link from here to stated facts as to how the plans of a family were turned into a nightmare by the abusers of the legal system through breaches of trust and contempt for the law].
  • Organised promotion of family break-ups rests squarely on the shoulders of the manipulative from within the Law Enforcement Agencies and the corrupted legal system; we are gathering and have sufficient information to back up and substantiate our statements. [*Link from here to an extract from a letter by a father to his daughter]
  • We link you from other text, lower down and from other pages, to an explicit Community On Line web-site. In that victim's case many a pre-arranged impositions on the targeted victim are seen to have been put in place from the onset [*Link to brief introduction at page]. Other state financed institutions seen to be part of 'the institutionalised, organised fraud and corruption arranged/created and run through the legal and court services, care of recklessly irresponsible judicial chair occupants - who MISCONDUCT [*Link to criminal prosecution case] IN PUBLIC OFFICE [*Link to explicit definition and the rights of citizens in any properly constituted and managed/run democratic state; *Link from here to explicit extract from states that pre-existed in the targeted civilisation by the fraudsters who created the most fraudulently misrepresented work ever to have been introduced to mankind; read the extract and recognise why for years Andrew Yiannides has bween pointing to the vile scenario from the Old Testament for years].  

To the left, in the margin / column, the article* [*Link] through which exposure of the facts of life in the United Kingdom. FAMILY LAW as practised by the manipulative from within the legal system for personal dishonest and fraudulent transfer / conversion of assets. All achieved care of  the judicial chair occupants, persons who rise to such public office through the ranks of the legal boffins, the citizens are victims of. The Breeding Grounds case [*Link] exposes more than enough. We ARE publishing more facts and realities that establish HOW HIGH THE FRAUDULENT ACTIVITIES and how contemptuous of the citizens' rights and the law itself* [*Link] the 'legal circles' in our alleged democracy* [*Link from here to definition quote on the principle of Democracy].

Many a family were and are being broken up by the manipulative as their way of getting to the assets of individuals and the citizens who challenge their practices; it is their first step towards the destruction, if achieved, of their intended victims. Information indeed had come to our attention in the G H Scriven cases*; we did intend to publish the material for the WORLD, but as it turned out, Mr Scriven adopted other plans, for the taxpayers, than those we were led to believe were his original and ongoing work while he was in regular contact with us. Our aims were, and still are, to inform the Jury at large of the realities of life within the courts and the legal system. The citizens are aware as to WHY, & WHAT FOR the Law Enforcement Agencies [*Link to the principles that apply in all TRUE democratic states; *Link to Lord Irvine's plans for the UK, *Link to Lord Irvine's plans for the planned 'facilities to the fraudsters club recruits']. However Mr & Mrs Average, within our shores (as in other 'western-influenced / controlled pseudo-democracies) are not aware that public servants, INCLUDING PERSONS WHO OCCUPY JUDICIAL CHAIRS, recklessly misconduct in public office (*Link to R v Dytham Court of Appeal, case). One can safely surmise that the root of the challenged abuse of the court's processes, and the facilities in the instance covered by 'The Appeal' below* [*Link], arose out of criminal activities, and that the 'man-woman' situation / divorce' was simply used for all that evolved and developed subsequently [*Link from here to a case when appropriate challenges caused the abductors and rapists of Justice to abandon their plans for the targeted 'serf', the irrelevant and discarded male / husband / father, 'just another of the sons of men' targeted by the followers of the teachings from the book we refer and point to, below* [*Link]].

We received information, also, that in the case of another victim-family the manipulative, from within the legal system, did attempt to create such a scenario. The situations and activities smack of issues we have been exposing and challenging, in our pages, in the most profound and clear-cut case, with elements taken out of the Old Testament. The Adam and Eve - lesson; the lost paradise; the lost nirvana; the lost peace of mind of the huMAN species of this planet / world where elements of 'blind obedience to a criminal was the cause of it all, the reason why the loss of peace of mind'. [*Link from here to exclusive and explicit revelations].

Humans should have learned from that 'biblical lesson' centuries ago and not allow the dishonest and the manipulative to carry on relentlessly destroying the moral fibre [*Link from here to HomePage succinct Quote] of the societies from within which the manipulative operate.

Humans should now muster such old lessons; they must recognise the facts of life the manipulative impose on them. As true masters of their own destinies they must raise the standards against the dishonest, the deceitful, the sycophants and the hypocrites [*Link]. The citizens, as individuals and as a joint force, should act and set up the necessary barriers to the controllers of their lives. The citizens should recognise that 'The LAW' is 'The LAW' and that the manipulative have no mandate from any government to misconduct in public office* [*Link from here to case]; they were never set free to act outside 'The LAW' in the United Kingdom; they had and have no right to act as the licensed creators of the United Kingdom's own Gulag. None is above 'The LAW' our judges keep reminding the citizens.

No public servant was ever granted a warrant bestowing independence of the restrains of 'Parliament's LAW'. No one has the right to act in breach of Sections of the Theft and Counterfeit Acts [*Link from here to legal argument founded on practices and resting on the law] of Parliament, determining the future of others through violations of human rights and abuse of public position.

Blatant misconduct in public office* [*L] aided and abetted through abuse of trust which the naive place in the manipulative fraudsters from within the legal system and services [*Link]. Criminal activities entered into and perpetrated with affront through blunt acts with assistance (care of convenient defaults in the execution of their public duties and reckless co-operation with the criminals) from within the police forces, wherefore substantial numbers of their members having close links and affinity [*Link, from here, to the common foundations] to the abusers of the legal system, through the common practices stated/covered in 'The Police Summons The Victim' case [*Link from here to the briefly stated case] establishing it all. We draw attention to the fact that defaults and omissions attract the same consideration in law as acts [*Link from here to an explicit House of Lords precedent case when their Lordships addressed much more than the usual defaults in matters of conspiracy, deceit, lies, FRAUD & suppression, keeping quiet about wrongdoing]. The Court of Appeal ruling in the case R-v-Dytham, also [*Link from here] and the provisions under the Criminal Justice Act 1988 which we publish in The CAMILA Project home page [*Linked to from here] are clear in stating Parliament's intentions. We quoted and relied upon our Parliament's provisions, in matters attached to Torment and Torture by public servants, in order to bring the message home to the authorities in the course of the Stephen Lawrence Inquiry [*Link from here to the relevant page] and we ensured ALL recognised converts-to & lovers / promoters of the organised crimes through abuse of the courts facilities were aware of our stance in such activities. We point, below, to the very elements and the practices endorsed and adopted by victim-converts who fell in love with the constructive frauds on the taxpayers.

A FALSE INSTRUMENTS to APPEAL from... the BLANK CHEQUES industry... For FALSE Instruments we request readers to access the exclusive brief resting on the THEFT ACTS
  • We publish below copy/paste of an actual APPEAL lodged at Lambeth County Court, by the Star in this page, a victim of the Divorce Industry. He contacted us for assistance but his true intentions were to abuse our readiness to support victims of the legal circles and the courts, while he was aiming for increased rewards under the table as arranged by the criminals in control of the legal & justice system. [*Link, from here, to the page / file where we cover exclusively the arrangements in place for rampant constructive frauds - on the taxpayers - through abuse of the courts' facilities. The very facilities and arrangements used for corruption of the conditioned (victims of the legal circles) who turn to lovers of fraud, precisely as the star in this page established through his actions and his most convenient defaults and omissions. His behaviour, typical of converts to and lovers of the system of operations. *Link from here to a House of Lords ruling and their deliberations clarifying the law applicable to activities that relate to (1) conspiracy, (2) deception, (3) misrepresentations, (4) deliberately remaining silent and failing to act in order to right any wrong(s) imposed on any other - the taxpayers as a whole most important - and what silence from such persons amounts to in law were & are].
  • The evidence we release and the relevant issues we point to, establish the person's criminal in intent parts. From deception through to fraudulent misrepresentations and blunt engagement with others in the creation of more costs awards to solicitors.
  • Such activities, after the letter written by solicitors, who were acting for him in other matters at the time, to another firm of solicitors. [*Link to the letter that lays bare the facts to the taxpayers, also government the employer of arrogant abusers of Public Office for the imposition of Institutionalised Frauds on the taxpayers ('serfs') and the CORRUPTION OF CONDITIONED MORONS of the aptitude and mentality of the Star of this page, Mr Johan Michael Richard Foenander, who set himself up as Chief Maintenance Engineer of the system as is].
  • Mr Foenander, as a victim of the practices the anonymous lawyer spoke of to the 'Mail on Sunday',  was very much in tune with the activities, the parts and the contributions of 'the fraudsters club recruits' who act as maintenance engineers AND USERS of 'the system as is' for pecuniary advantage and personal ill-begotten gains. Through attachment to victims of the legal circles THEY ARE POINTED TO, through many an organised false fronts, such as we researched and looked into and as another solicitor wrote of to a client in March 2003, the perpetuation of ORGANISED FRAUD imposed on the taxpayers through abuse of the courts' facilities. [*Link from here to the article image and other realities we point to]
  • The proceedings in J. M. R. Foenander's divorce case, gave rise to the Appeal* [*L] below. He had been   caused to change solicitors one's too often before converting to lover and user of the facilities in place for more of the same, fraud on the taxpayers. The concerned SHOULD ACCESS & READ 'the other application' he was party to for it establishes, beyond any doubt HIS PART in the ORGANISED CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUDS on the taxpayers THROUGH ABUSE of the courts facilities. [*Link [*L] from here to the inexcusable application, -images below - and do not overlook the fact that it was simply intended for the creation of a costs order in favour of  the solicitor].
  • He, Mr Johan M. R. Foenander discovered the facility for rewarding persons who fall to the arrangements we expose in the explicit page and he joined others who converted to lovers of the system as is (No doubt, in our mind, WHO the co-ordinator behind the organised fraudsters club recruits is). As a tutored stooge & convert to it all, he came along acting as a maintenance engineer of the system.
  • All too keen to abuse our time and eager to partake in the creation of whatever scenarios he was being tutored & guided in by other converts, lovers and users of the courts facilities for fraud aplenty on the taxpayers, as their co-ordinator was and has been organising. [*Link [*L] from here to the facilities in place that convert victims to lovers of FRAUD on the taxpayers].
  • The hypocrite proved to have been more than ready and willing to abuse our time while he was serving other interests than those he had been proclaiming to us.[*Link [*L] from here to activities, behind the scenes, by the double-faced sycophant & hypocrite. All was exposed, months later, through an audio cassette he gave to Andrew; it contained more than the copy of the recording of the exchanges between Mr Andrew Yiannides and senior staff at the Court of Appeal office, at the Royal Court of Justice. It included a recording which he made when he telephoned Mr Norman Scarth who, like him, had fallen in love with the system as is. The latter accepted the offer to operate as the Honorary Secretary of the LIPS crowd/mob while engaging in his own two-paths to his chosen 'nirvana', as the great hero he proclaimed himself to be in his book : "Cause For Concern''. Amazingly he failed to recognise that what he was engaging in was the biggest cause for concern to 'the serfs' targeted by 'fraudsters gifted with such mentalities and attitude to law as the two who exchanged opinions and views which Mr Johan Michael Richard Foenander recorded for posterity. *Link [*L] from here to the page where the sycophants, hypocrites & fraudsters are exposed].
  • Every firm of solicitor, who represented him, simply carried on as the previous firms had done and as pleaded in the Appeal, below. (NOTE: the victim, as a recruit in the fraudsters club, we cover in our exclusive page* [*Link] NEVER intended to expose the issues he brought to, and raised with us, precisely as other known fraudsters club recruits behaved. [*Link [*L] from here to a page where we expose the parts of another LIPS introduction to Mr Yiannides, a recognised fraudsters club recruit who failed the first test she was put to].
  • Through constructive frauds and false instruments the conversion of assets [*Link [*L] from here to a page where we expose arrogant PERJURY by a solicitor and the victim of it all, as a fraudsters club recruit, DID ABSOLUTELY NOTHING about such matters]. Many the victim who fall prey to the fraudulent activities at and in the courts, through abuse of the legal system & the courts facilities [*Link [*L] from here to the actions of a genuine challenger & member of the Community On Line; the person acted because of concerns for the thousands of the victims the 'fraudsters club recruits target, just like the hireling who accepted the brief, from above, to waste our time and to obstruct our work, as he wilfully indulged].
  • The stated facts, in the Appeal and as we experienced with and from the hireling / recruit, call for investigations proper, by the authorities, especially by the Home Office. [*Link [*L] from here to the Prime Minster's reference to ORGANISED CRIME when he addressed the House of Commons on his return to the UK from the Summit of the leaders of the EU in June 2005 - soon after an attempt to silence us failed to bear fruits *link from here to the attempt]
  • The promotions from the hirelings (fraudsters club recruits) and the Lord Chancellor's Department and personal office, who elect to treat such activities, 'as within the remit of the 'rights of judicial chair occupants' are unacceptable. [*Link [*L] from here to part from a transcript when a judicial chair occupant arrogantly asserted that the use of a FORGERY had been determined in the UK courts, hence, the victim should be happy with the cash under the table, organised frauds on the taxpayers. WAKE UP SHITIZENS, TAXPAYING SUCKERS.... Cease waffling in all manner of DIVERSIONARY RUBBISH YOU ARE PRESENTED WITH by the naive and the agents of the managers of CIUKU (Crimes Incorporated United Kingdom Unlimited) ENTERPRISES].
  • The reactions from the Lord Chancellor's Department and responses in the usual manner, as the illiterate in English (and much more) member of staff [*Link [*L] from here to the evidence] who communicated to the victim in 'The Breeding Grounds - case'* [*L]. as in the letter we point visitors to. Everything simply exposes arrogant endorsement of the criminal activities reported to alleged servants of the public AND THE LAW. Such issues surfaced, also, in the Judith Ward case. [*Link [*L] from here to the news headlines]
  • DO NOTE that the victim (Mr Johan M. R. Foenander) over a period of some ten months, proved that he never had any intentions to challenge properly or to expose the criminals who are in control of the legal system and the courts. He was simply serving other interests and priorities, [*Link [*L] from here to relevant evidence] as a hireling who accepted the role he had been assigned by a guru and the organisers of the LIPS crowd / mob, the persons who introduced him to Andrew and *human-rights*.
  • FULL PARTICULARS and the EVIDENCE are to be published in our pages. All XXX's entries (from the text below) were removed and the identity of each and every party is thus released.
  • WE are doing our duty and reporting crime to the authorities, OPENLY and as OUR AIMS [*Link [*L] from here to 'our aims' declaration] qualify and clarify. ALL can benefit from the right to reply and or challenge THROUGH THE ONLY OPEN COURT, for the world jury to determine and not as the corrupt, the corrupters and the corrupted have been imposing on the world for millennia [*Link [*L] from here to such proof].

We add that the documented evidence had been available for the Lord Chancellor and his dedicated team to inspect; his Lordship was invited on a number of instances to take stock of the situation, AS THE MINISTER RESPONSIBLE for the activities of persons he and his department maintain as alleged public servants, including his Lordship's position in our allegedly 'democratic(!) and civilised(?)' society [*Link [*L] from here to page released in April 2007 where we publish explicit letters to the Lord Chancellor, including one we drafted and settled for the member of the *human-rights.org* Community on Line, whose case Mr Andrew Yiannides took all the way to the European Court of Human Rights]. They, all public servants, should act without further prevarication. They should have dealt with the issues covered in the files we referred them to; they should deal with the files / cases we will be referring to his Lordship and his department. The case-files we referred them to related to misconducted court 'hearings'. The issues covered arose out of similarly 'engineered fraudulent court proceedings', as in the Appeal below. Similar activities are also covered in the case that arose out of thefts, misappropriation and fraudulent conversion of "Housing Benefit funds*, through constructive frauds care of judicial chair occupants as in the material published at:
http://www.government.uk-human-rights.org/Local/Enfield/Council/attempts.htm

Theft of properties (including rights assured in law) achieved care of persons, allegedly acting judiciously, while in occupation of judicial chairs. Abusers of public office issuing FALSE INSTRUMENTS [*Link [*L] from here to relevant law] blank cheques to the legal professions from within which circles they (judicial chair occupants) arise to public office. Conversion of assets, their enterprising activities in breach of 'The LAW', through false instruments lacking accountability [*Link [*L] from here to brief legal argument resting on the Theft Acts].

Indictable offences .  In the event that the police should indicate an interest IN THE CRIMES indulged into by the legal professions we shall be very pleased to assist them on condition that the instructions issued to Scotland Yard in July 1998 will be seen to be leading to genuine ACTIONS by the police; no more, an end to, waffle.  The press and media are similarly invited to concern themselves with such realities and to cease offering to the public, at large, half baked potatoes as in the Benefits scams and constructive frauds we had cause to refer to many as of March/April 1995.

The BBC in the series 'Raising the Roof', documentaries, offered a half baked potato in respect of the Housing Benefit frauds industry. The producer / BBC were offered assistance to deal with the FULL facts. WE HAVE BEEN WAITING FOR YEARS, for the wasters of public funds and tax / license revenue to contact us & prove they are serving the citizens, the taxpayers and not as lapdogs their masters, or as marionettes their manipulators.

November 1998, letter to the petitioner from the European Court of Human Rights.
  • Clearly stated the rules of procedure and the practice at the European Court of Human Rights, STRASBOURG
  • Reads the 2nd paragraph: -
    ".. single member of the court, acting as Rapporteur, will carry out a preliminary examination of this application and report to the court on the question of its admissibility".
  • We STRESS that it was and is a SINGLE member who acts as stated in the letter, on issues of admissibility. (*F8)
  • We point to the content of the letter on the right (below) and request of visitors, readers and researchers to read the letter to the very solicitors from Mr Andrew Yiannides when conversion of Housing Benefit funds were contemplated by the very solicitor who was working in tandem with another, licensed by the Law Society, criminal, the solicitor who, allegedly, was representing the interests and rights of the owner of THE FUNDS BOTH SOLICITORS TARGETED FOR CONVERSION to legal costs through the usual manifestations and inexcusable contribution by judicial chair occupants and court staff.
  • All was instigated and organised by Haringey Council staff and officers, with the blessings of the police and the local County Court staff & officers, naturally = CIUKU at its best.
jfecarfr.jpg (58548 bytes)
WE STRESS and emphasise that it was and it is a SINGLE member who acts as stated in the letter, on issues of admissibility. Refer to a very important FOOTNOTE on the issue of admissibility. (F2)
Link from here to a letter further down, from the client's solictor when writing to another solicitor; NOTE >how the solicitor was writing of the rewards under the table, paid out of the taxes imposed on the sucker-serfs, as arranged though the European Court for HUman Rights... ON THE CONDITION THE BENEFICIARY AGREES TO KEEP IT ALL IN THE FAMILY CLOSET >as blackmailed by the organisers< of the constructive frauds isntigated and processed through abuse of the legal system and the court facilities..

     The above revelations and exposures as regards the targeting of the funds owing to the targeted provider of accommodation to an abused 'beneficiary', who allegedly had been made redundant and therefore qualified for Housing Benefit Assistance (as organised by and misrepresented with fraudulent intentions by abusers of public office) we dedicate to Mr Colin Peters, the Northern co-ordinator of the LIPS crowd-mob.
    He was and had been (still is) promoting for well over 10 years opinions about the abused Legal Aid facilities in the case when he was the victim of fraudulently conducted County Court proceedings. Conveniently he never STATED THE FACTS BORN OF THE CASE (he had been using as part of his contributions to the subliminal indoctrination tactical assaults of victims of the legal circles) IN ANY PERMANENT DOMAIN FACILITY.
    We refer above to the INTERNET, and facilities such as the free Community on Line web-sites.
     Although he joined the avenue (CoL), as a victim, who allegedly endorsed 'Our Aims' declaration, HE FAILED TO STATE the facts of the plots he HAD BEEN the victim of, or produce any evidence in support of his views and opinions.    The REASONS for his failures should be clear to any grey matter user; to any 'thinker' and to any true 'human' who was or is made aware of the specific parts in which all LIPS crowd/mob members engage in..... as Mr Johan Michael Richard Foenander did in the instances we point to, in this and in the page where we expose Johan M. R. Foenander through his parts when he instigated a telephone call to Mr. Norman Scarth in order to 'promote ill-conceived and ill-founded reckless assertions about the realities we cover in our pages; he specifically set about to bring about an end to our co-operation in promoting and putting in the public domain what Messrs Geoffrey Harold Scriven and Mr Norman Scarth were engaging in, prior to committing themselves (as Johan M. R. Foenander, Colin Peter and others we name and expose in our pages) to promotion and use of the facilities in place for rampant fraud on the taxpayers, intended to & leading to the corruption of morons; all through abuse of the courts facilities, as we point in our exclusive page where we cover the arrangements.    We simply point out that not one of the fraudsters club recruits ever addressed the realities we point to; however, one and all all recklessly made it their business to suppress it all, as the Media Barons command of and impose on 'the serfs', through the Intellectual Prostitutes the Barons retain and maintain as alleged reporters of events on the world stage of organised 'crimes against humanity' by the abductors and rapists of both Democracy & Justice*.
(*F7)

Keep your offer; our client is being rewarded by the taxpayers, through the European Court of Human Rights. He chose wisely as our God, the Architect of the societies we have been building, as his authorised agents, arranged. 

*Link from here to the suppressed realities : fraud organised by the legal circles & persons who JOIN THE CLUB as covered in the exclusive page which alleged victims of the abused courts' processes buried in the dark corners of their corrupted mindsets. All and everything is processed through abuse of the courts facilities while afforded the aura of respectability and legitimacy, as promoted by the media while alleged victims promote the powers that be].

   We point elsewhere, in our pages, that 'the victim' in the instance at hand, WAS SENT along by the managers, organisers and the guru behind the LIPS crowd/mob, in mid August 1999.
   The introduction well AFTER the letter we publish, on the right, was written by the solicitors who, years earlier, engaged in other questionable activities, as we state & expose in our pages.
[*Link from here to an affidavit and read of the parts Antons the solicitors engaged in including abuse of the Legal Aid facilities]
   They were noted to have been party to invisible services in the Conversion of Housing Benefit funds as we cover in our pages
[*Link from here to an explicit letter to the very solicitors years earlier. At the time Antons engaged in abuse of the courts facilities and blunt attempts to convert to legal costs, funds owing for occupation of rented accommodation, under a Shorthold Tenancy agreement, needless to say another firm of solicitors, also STAFF +  OFFICERS of a County Court were party to the fraudulent abuse of the Courts' facilities].
   Consequently we were NOT IMPRESSED with their parts in the flagship of CIUKU Enterprises (-Divorce Industry-). Their parts in the National Scandal* (-Housing Benefit FRAUD) is covered in material we released. [*Link from here to the page where we point to the parts of the solicitor in the Housing Benefit scams]
   Readers and victims of the legal circles are urged to access the footnote below
(*F8) and from the short introductions to the elements we cover, to proceed accordingly. We set off by pointing to the content of an affidavit supported with relevant exhibits to it, to which visitors / readers can link from here* [*L].

Solicitors who engaged in the Housing Benefit theft & conversion of funds activity wrote also the letter below.   ajhrlfsr.jpg (41559 bytes)
*Link from here to their part in fraudulent use of the courts processes as evinced in our pages.

The very solicitors, Antons, earlier did engage & were involved in fraudulent attempts arrogantly intended to convert Housing Benefit funds, owing and due to a private landlord, to legal costs, through the usual constructive frauds enterained by and created through abuse of the courts facilities. The DEFAULT SUMMONS, we refer to, was issued by a private landlord whose property was rented to a person who claimed to have been made redundant. The tenant's claims were supported by Haringey Council staff, while failing, for months, to process, or produce evidence in respect of the alleged application for Social Security assistance towards the unpaid rents, assured through Housing Benefit in such circumstances. In the meantime we had more than enough information that the person was in fact working. And worse, when legal action was instigated FOR THE UMPAID RENTS, DUE & OWING (as contarcted), the criminals operating out of Haringey Council Social Services (the Housing Benefit handlers) and their associates within Haringey Council arranged for the move of THE USED FRAUDSTERS to Local Authority Housing where the fraudsters rushed to move, in a commonly referred to 'MOONLIGHT FLIGHT OPERATION'.

The Application below was organised between Mr Johan Michael Richard Foenander -the star of this page- with others while he was abusing with intent the time and generous nature of Mr. Andrew Yiannides. The court fees necessitated for the theatrical production were transferred from an APPEAL APPLICATION in respect of the struck out action. The gurus guiding & working alongside Mr. J. M. R. Foenander, for the generation of the additional 'awards to solicitors', were recognised & known fraudsters club recruits. Read, below, of the elements attached to the ploy used by 'the recruits to the circle of maintenance engineers* (*through silence as to their new roles) of the rampant fraud organised through abuse of the courts' facilities. Get to know WHY THE APPLICATION WAS NOTHING BUT A SCAM, as the architects of it all INTENDED. >>> An unjustified & inexcusable, under the rules of the Supreme Court, application was simply intended to lead to the generation of additional costs awards & the ensuing transfer of funds to solicitors WITH THE TAXPAYERS MEETING THE COST of it all <<<. Follow the link below pointing to the recorded (transcript of) telephone exchanges between the star of this page and Mr. Norman Scarth. When there read of and note the chain of events / developments leading to such abuse of the courts facilities by persons who join the club and engage in such fraudulent abuse of the courts processes when operating in tandem with the legal curcles.

   DATE & TIME are of the essence. We will be publishing evidence FROM WHICH OTHER DOCUMENT the FRAUDSTER transferred the fee to the USELESS(?) & FRAUDULENT IN INTENT application, bearing in mind the need to APPEAL already entered decisions PLUS the very element of THE REWARD TO THE LEGAL CIRCLES, while the fraudsters club recruit was toeing the line & playing the field as he arranged with other fraudster club recruits. One Lou Foley, with others in the background, party to the ploy. [*Link from here to a newspaper article about a victim used by the 'genius', Mr Lou Foley, for the usual theatrics in the halls of abducted Justice]. The application, as created, just an impressive show piece for use in a theatrical production, as intended, to impress the naive and gullible. Nothing unusual. Intriguing that a (Section 42) Vexatious Litigant was allowed to address the court for a few minutes before he was ordered out by the director of the scenario for the day & 'the applicant just happy to benefit from the intended costs order against him..... thereafter to be processed as a blank cheque from the taxpayers to the legal circles care of the arrangements through the European Court of Human Rights. 
   On the right, below, the second page of the application, as prepared by Mr Lewis / Louis, Lou Foley, to whom Mr Johan Michael Richard Foenander made references in the course of his recorded exchanges with Mr Norman Scarth, the Honorary Secretary of the LIPS crowd/mob.
   Readers, researchers might consider contacting Mr. J M R Foenander and asking him for a copy of the Appeal for which he had been abusing Mr Yiannides' time. Copy of the first page should suffice. Reference to the FEE STAMP DATE & TIME establishes his evil part in the arrogant and blunt abuse of the time and generous nature of the founder of human-rights. The appeal (& the intended abuse for work that was to be ignored) was referred to in the telephone exchanges between J M R Foenander and Norman Scarth.[*Link from here to arrogant exchanges between conspirators who set themselves up as maintenance engineers of & beneficiaries from the system & operate as alleged legal gurus].

Front page
jfo9al1r.jpg (102149 bytes)
Click the image to enlarge & note that we point (ARROW) to the fee as paid for the application in the right hand side of the image just below the court's Seal - Date & TIME issued AFTER transfer of fee

   Party to the activities behind the scene, while intentionally abusing Andrew's time and good will, working with the victim (?) IN ORDER TO CHALLENGE & EXPOSE THE ABUSERS OF THE COURTS PROCESSES, none other but the conniving & wily Norman Scarth. [*Link from here to exchanges with the star in this page Mr Johan Michael Richard Foenander in the course of a telephone call which he instigated. Note the references to their 'plan' to use the avenue which one of their PARTNERS IN THE CONVERSION OF TARGETED BUDGET FUNDS TO LEGAL COSTS, was putting together, the very application we reproduce on the right; the TWO IMAGES AN APPLICATION FOUNDED ON A STRUCK OUT ACTION WITHOUT RESTORATION].
It is essential that the visitor, reader, researcher AND VICTIMS USED by such fraudsters / charlatans, GET TO KNOW OF THE SIMPLE RULE, most relevant to Court Procedure:
    
'No action shall be allowed to proceed, in respect of an action that has been struck out by the court on / for substantially the same grounds UNLESS THE COSTS OF THE STRUCK OUT ACTION HAVE BEEN MET'. Friends we are pointing to the creation of additional costs charges created through the an inexcusable application, as concocted by Mr Foley & Mr Foenander with Mr Norman Scarth seconding it all; all three operating as maintenance engineers of the system AS IS.
     All visitors, victims or not MUST READ the letter from the solicitors above, months earlier, and consider the implications in respect of OBVIOUS PARTICIPATION IN THE RAMPANT ABUSE OF THE COURTS' FACILITIES. 

Back page
jfo9al2r.jpg (83353 bytes)
The application issued & placed on the  court's lists without delay & no complaints or problems.
Of such activities and practices many the constructive frauds on 'the serfs', whether as clients of some licensed criminal or as taxpayers, meeting the costs paid via the rewards to the silent lovers / converts to the system as is. HENCE THE FAILURE of one and all from within the organised / managed / controlled / directed USED VICTIMS of the Legal circles and the courts, such as the LIPS crowd/mob. [*List of such groups will be released in due course. Visitors and readers / researchers are urged to access from here [*L] and read the extract from a letter which a solicitor wrote to a client in March 2003]

...

Below an example of abused time and trust by the evil and maligned lover of the system as is

  • We refer to other fraudsters club recruits, too, and we point to their activities and convenient defaults.
  • We cover more than enough, in our pages, by way of their practices and blunt contempt for the law, just like those (*F6) they set off complaining of and about in the first instance.
  • Billions of taxpayers contributions stolen annually (converted to alleged compensation) for victims of the legal circles who act as blackmailed morons and aim for the rewards under the table consequential to the arrogantly organised constructive frauds through via abuse of the courts facilities. [*Link [*L] from here to full particulars]
  • We expose the above system of operations in the exclusive page, readers / visitors can link to from above.
  • NOT ONE of the persons we name & expose ever addressed the practices we expose FOR THE BENEFIT of ill-informed and 'treated as serfs of the Middle Ages', suckers who pay taxes for the blunt and arrogantly organised constructive frauds through the abused courts' facilities, which matters we cover in the page all citizens should be pointed to by any law abiding and or concerned visitor to / reader of the page.
  • Needless to say one expects of genuine victim-challengers to voice objections, write to their Members of Parliament and representatives in government, (Members of Parliament) and point the papers to the unacceptable arrangements for 'institutionally organised fraud on the tax-payers and corruption of morons.
  • We publish below evidence that the 'victim' after acquiring and reading the rules to Professional Conduct of solicitors, wrote to another in the explicit terms on the issue of criminal activities by 'the professionals'.

Readers, researchers, victims might consider contacting Mr Foenander and enquiring of him as to why he failed to fetch along to the Royal Courts of Justice the essential copies of the documents that were to be attached to the affidavit which he thus rendered 'waste bin material' AFTER RECKLESSLY WASTING the time of Mr Andrew Yiannides as he had done also in connection with the Appeal, to which he referred in the course of his telephone call (in mid / late October 1999) and his exchanges with Mr. Norman Scarth. Read above, however, of his part in the reckless application intended for more, legal costs awards to the solicitors acting for the SIF.

jfayan0r.jpg (50143 bytes)
The convert / lover of the system as is', the arrogant abuser of trust & his partner asked for an affidavit in respect of the matters Mr A. Yiannides had been invited to witness and assist the 'victim' in/with. Both failed to fetch to the court, copies of the warranted documented evidence! ABUSE beyond belief by and from a convert / corrupted >beneficiary from funds plundered from the national budget.

An explicit letter from Mr. Johan M R Foenander (the star for this page) to Mr Geoffrey Harold Scriven, evinces grasp & comprehension of the criminal activities by the legal circles at, in and THROUGH THE COURTS. The only element the convert failed to touch was the ORGANISED CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUDS LEADING TO THE REWARDS* [*L] UNDER THE TABLE to fraudsters club recruits of his mentality and that of the rest of his chums within LIPS and their affiliates / associates..... all conveniently FAILING TO REPORT TO 'THE SERFS', to the taxpayers, THE FRAUDULENT ACTIVITIES THEY WERE FULLY AWARE OF and thereafter users of it all as their activities & defaults establish without room for any doubt.

  • The letter on the right, three pages of it, establish KNOWLEDGE of the facility for the arrogant thefts of funds and the blunt money-laundering activities by the legal circles through abuse of the courts facilities.
  • Nowhere is the author, however making any reference to the element of the INTENDED THEFT OF TAX REVENUES FOR THE REWARDS he and his chums had already agreed to bury in the far corners of their evil and corrupted minds. [*Link [*L] from here to the exclusive page where the scheme is exposed].
  • For the benefit of other & new victims, also for readers and researchers we have used an OCR programme and created a document in HTML. We publish it in our pages for links to parts of its content & from stated facts to other pages & websites who link to this website / co-operate with us in exposing the abusers of the courts facilities.
Page1jflhlc1r.jpg (107718 bytes) Page2jflhlc2r.jpg (115545 bytes)

Page3jflhlc3r.jpg (59837 bytes)
Letter to / for Mr Geoffrey Harold Scriven. A copy was given, by the author, the star in this page to Mr A Yiannides, in order to impress....

The content of the above letter ESTABLISHES WITHOUT ROOM FOR DOUBT that the author, a victim of the abused court facilities, was fully aware of the fact that the legal circles engaged and were engaging in ARROGANT, ORGANISED FRAUD ON THE TAXPAYERS. Even worse he and the parts of his solicitors, Antons, in the organised fraud : FOR THE TAXPAYERS TO MEET THE COST of the REWARD TO THE VICTIM OF THE LEGAL CIRCLES & THE COURTS through the usual plundering of tax revenue, as covered in the letter from Antons the solicitors* [*L] was and remains most unacceptable.

Letter dated 11th March 2000, settled by Mr Andrew Yiannides

for Mr Johan M R Foenander to submit to his Member of Parliament, the Rt. Hon. Tessa Jowell MP.

  • Mr J M R Foenander had been promoting the fact that his Member of Parliament had been ignoring his letters.
  • He had been asserting similar scenarios about other public bodies and Public Servants, such as the police.
  • In the circumstances Mr Yiannides settled a number of letters for submission to various persons and authorities, such as the letter, on the right, which the 'victim' (!) forwarded to the intended recipient.
  • Interestingly the 'victim' did merit from responses including one from the police who wrote back to assert the CPS opined there was insufficient evidence to secure a conviction and that Mr Hussein had been interviewed in June 1999 (*F). Also that the complaints were to be referred, by Streatham Police to the Fraud Squad at Holborn Police !!!

jfltmp1r.jpg (65662 bytes)
References to New Labour's undertaking in 1995.

jfltmp2r.jpg (101878 bytes)
Copy of the response was  secured from the convert.
Many the failures, by the victim (?), to cause public servants to take any interest in the reported complaints! Of such matters the promotions by Mr Johan Michael Richard Foenander. Nothing unusual, especially when such victims fail to approach the issues appropriately. [*Read below the response from the police, MONTHS LATE]
One of the responses, a letter from the police, below, introduced the usual elements including the ever present INTIMIDATION resting on legal costs, should one instigate private prosecution / legal proceedings.... ALL CARE OF POLICE FAILURES to apply facts & evidence to existing law [*Link from here to a letter settled by Mr. Andrew Yiannides, covering the reckless defaults of alleged servants of the public who deliberately indulge, in order to generate income for the legal circles, as coverd in the short letter to the Crown Ptrosecution Service *Link also from here to developments in October 2010, when the Attorney General spoke of the police distancing themselves in FRAUD cases]

jflpof1r.jpg (75195 bytes)
...... the Crown Prosecution Service dos not believe there is a realistic chance of conviction.
Mr Hussein was interviewed on the 29th June 1999 in the presence of his solicitors.
D S Laing has been instructed to prepare a report to be sent to the Fraud Squad at Holborn, to see if they can assist.

jflpof2r.jpg (31601 bytes)
A realistic timetable for the submission and a decision from them is likely to be about two months from today.
Advice given to the police by the CPS is subject to  legal privilege.
The Fraud Squad decision will be communicated to you by D S Laing or DCI Snelling when received. However, at the end of the day you retain the right to instigate a private prosecution if you believe your numerous cases strong enough to do so. I would advise you to seek independent legal advice before you embark on this course of  action. 

  • Public servants DO RESPOND.
  • They do so when they are caused to  recognise that issues raised, by members of the public, when  put to them in a manner that evinces grasp of the criminal activities, cannot be ignored.
  • The victim did cover criminal activities in his letter to Mr Geoffrey Scriven. [*Link to one of the articles in the media wherein elements raised were NOT THE REALITIES COVERED IN THE LETTER by J M R Foenander to Mr Scriven, above]
  • Mr A. Yiannides was not informed if Mr. J M R Foenander ever posted similar claims / assertions to the Law Society or to the Society's protection racket centre, the OSS.
  • Reference to interviewing Mr Hussein on the 29th June 1999 but no reference to any report / response to 'the victim' earlier.
  • It is for Mr & Mrs Average to work it out WHY such a letter / response, by the police, was not considered essential earlier.
  • References to private prosecutions, if not satisfied with the CPS decision & attached to the right also the 'intimidation on the issue of costs should a private prosecution fails.

Of such attendance to the serious issues reported to the police. In reference to private prosecution a simple pointer to 'the victim' by Mr A. Yiannides was not recognised for what the words used actually pointed to: 'Johan, at the end of the day you must admit, that Mr Hussein, did assist you and put you on track for the case in Europe, and we know what that did lead to'. [The convert lover of 'the system as is' failed to grasp the hint. He was failing to challenge & expose it all in the public domain, to AWAKEN THE CITIZENS, to let them know what was going on in the name of Justice, how the legal circles were abusing the courts' facilities. Claiming rights and PERSISTENTLY FAILING TO CONSIDER OBLIGATIONS to the rest of Society, to the taxpayers DELIBERATELY, keeping them in the dark JUST LIKE THE MEDIA happens to be the MODUS OPERANDI of and by persons who abort their conscious and adopt the ways of the legal circles]. 

BELOW the evidence : proof that a solicitor who was retained by the 'fraudsters club recruit' to 'act for the stooge did not act as was being promoted by the convert / lover of the system as is. The conniving fraudster set about recommending the firm which he knew was not to be acting as the fraudsters club recruit was promoting. The solicitor  DID NOTHING OF THE SORT, as the documents below evince and establish. The solicitors were merely retained by 'the craft-y one ONLY FOR THE DISTRIBUTION OF THE FUNDS paid to the victim(!) as the reward he was after FOR KEEPING IT ALL IN THE FAMILY CLOSET. [*Link from here to the letter from the solicitor who had been acting for the fraudster at the time and beyond, when the 'victim' was sent along by Peter Hayward of the LIPS crowd/mob to mess about with Andrew's goodwill and patience with morons who fell in love with the system as operated by the legal circles  
Fax cover sheet 22 Nov 1999jfsfocsr.jpg (47430 bytes)
Fax transmission referring to letter offering payments, to the licensed (solicitors) who just indulge in criminal activities and benefit  from endorsement of their criminal activities, care of judicial chair occupants.
jfs22n1r.jpg (65150 bytes)
Proposals to settle existing charges through solicitors, & remittances by the client Mr J. M R. Foenander. Refer to the letter from the solicitors who had been acting for the victim / convert for quite some time and  was very much in the picture & flow of things..... [*Link [*L] from here to... ]
jfs22n2r.jpg (35720 bytes)
The offers on 22nd November 1999 in respect of charges & liabilities going back to 1997. The text of the letter released in the public interest because of the convert's FAILURE TO REPORT / expose the abuse of the courts' facilities, as had been agreed in the first instance, IRRESPECTIVE of the usual promotions about the media and the reckless police DEFAULTS in their duties.
  • Below we point out what the new solicitors were retained for.
  • The correspondence, which the 'victim', convert-lover of the operations through the courts, exchanged with / received from the new solicitors 'he retained and instructed(!) made it all more than clear.
  • The copies as transmitted by FAX endorsed also with hand-written CONFIRMATIONS sought. [Refer to the hand written text in the second image below and to the bold red font below the image]
  • Released also the content of the letter to the 'victim / convert' on the left. Readers, researchers should refer to the exclusive page the victim/convert and ALL of his affiliates / associates failed to address, also to the letter from his solicitors to another solicitor MAKE FOR ONLY ONE SAD CONCLUSION: - 'Rampant Fraud & Corruption through courts'.
  • On the right one of the letters written to 'the maintenance engineer and lover of the system as is' by the solicitors he retained to distribute the funds' owing to the abusers of trust and the courts facilities'.
  • The firm of solicitors did NOT attend the hearing of the application for 'the awards to the 'victim's' ex-partner and the parties who acted for her in the fraudulently administered court proceedings AND the 'victim' had nothing to say about the lack of interest but plenty about the distribution of the funds which he allegedly secured through loans from his bankers and a sister.... as if the letter from Antons & Co. the solicitors had been written in invisible ink.
  • The very firm simply advised the 'victim' as to HOW MUCH THE COUNTY COURT could AWARD the other side by way of costs.  
Page1 of a fax from the new solicitors.
jfls22n1r.jpg (82673 bytes)
Page2 with hand written addenda.
jfls22n2r.jpg (47401 bytes)
See red text below

jfccn99r.jpg (77323 bytes)
Order dated 31 October 2000 in respect of legal costs awards to solicitors in the sum of £9793.77

jfo8o99r.jpg (34731 bytes)
The application to strike out the claim against solicitors in October 1999 as transmitted by the victim / convert.
jfbso99r.jpg (27313 bytes)
Back sheet of the application as transmitted to Mr Andrew Yiannides by Mr Johan Michael Richard Foenander

The hand written endorsement from the above image, reads: -
PS.  This agreement is made on the assumption that no monies have been paid to you since 17th December 1997 and that as of that date the sum of £6928.78 plus interest was due and owing.
      You also agree to secure the removal of the caution registered in your favour upon payment of £6900.

Visitors, victims, readers and researchers need only to access from here and read the letter from the convert's solicitor to another solicitor in order to recognise what the solicitors and convert engaged in. Victims of the legal circles and the Law Enforcement Agencies -police & courts- also concerned taxpayers could seek clarification from their Member of Parliament and or the convert if he can be found / contated.

THE  APPEAL

INTRODUCTORY NOTES:

  • Details of the Court(s) and the individuals who indulged as stated in the Appeal were not published initially (in April 2000) because we wished to afford the relevant authorities, and the Ministers in charge of our Law Enforcement Agencies : (a) the Home Secretary / Police and (b) the Lord Chancellor / Court Service, opportunities to instigate proper inquiries into the activities of 'the Legal Professions and their circles' of 'accomplished partners in organised rampant fraud', on the serfs and the taxpayers, through abuse of the courts, as we cover and expose in the exlcusive page the star of this page knew of and like all of his affiliates and associates elected to bury in the dark corners of the caves he was / is congregating with such other fraudsters club recruits and lovers of it all. We simply point, from here, to the letter the fraudster wrote to Mr. Geoffrey Harold Scrivens, when all were preparing for the showcase covered in 'convenient newspaper articles.
  • We anticipated and worked with and for other victim-citizens. Some behaved as the hirelings and tutored 'recruits to the fraudsters club' we name and expose in our pages. Others simply shoved their heads in the sand, even though alleged victims of the activities we cover and relate to in our pages, in typical ostrich acts and as unconcerned NON-VICTIMS OF THE ACTIVITIES THEY WERE COMPLAINING OF & ABOUT. [*Links to pages where we point to the activities and the convenient failings / defaults by converts-to and maintenance engineers of the system of operations through the abused courts' facilities: *FC1 , *FC2 ,*FC3 , *FC4 , *FC5 , ].
  • Others, who came forward, proceeded as OUR AIMS [*Link from here to statement of intent] qualify [*Link from here to the site]. They challenged as the Appeal below qualifies. The tutored hireling and mischief maker did not proceed with the appeal, at court, because of the other arrangements [*Link] he already engaged in, with others, without disclosing his duplicity of purpose activities  .
  • Another victim's case proceeded in accordance with our policy and culminated in the exclusive petition that was processed and submitted to the European Court of Human Rights.[*Link from here to the petition]
  • We request that you consider the violations as pleaded and argued by Andrew (intellectual property as with the Appeal below) the founder of *human-rights*. (*Link to violations pleaded, founded and resting on the facts stated and arising out of the practices we expose in our pages).
  • Do consider the exchanges between the hireling/recruit with another devious and mischievous member of the LIPS crowd/mob (*Link). The aspirations of such persons: 'to act as other initiates who joined the 'fraudsters club'. [*Link from here to an exclusive page].
  • The LIPS crowd introduced also another time-waster. Just another LIPS member, and a typical abuser of our facilities and readiness to help and assist VICTIMS [*Link from here to our actions, after we caught that hireling, who had received warning shots, engaging in blunt constructive frauds with the circles she had been complaing about. *Link also from here to the explicit FAX she received in March 2001] because of the devious and crafty machinations the tutored hireling was engaging in, in collaboration with others).
  • Self appointed legal experts aiming to serve as such and as the Old Age pensioner benefited from, care of the activities of actors who are tutored and guided by others in the art of fraudulent misrepresentations and deception. Always ready to impress and intimidate victims with their knowledge of how corrupt the system is, but only in private. Impressive presentations from fifth-rate actor-hirelings - 'fraudsters club recruits'.

2.    We draw attention to the provisions of the Criminal Justice Act 1968, in respect of publishing material intended to lead to prosecution of ALL offenders. Lord Jeffrey Archer benefited from a prosecution because of the falsified Diary entries and the end result 'the perversion of justice'.

3.    We are still waiting for the criminals in charge of the police at Haringey - North London (*Link) to prosecute the criminals who indulged in the creation AND PROMOTION / USE of a FORGERY & TWO SUBSEQUENT CLONES for the theft, and misappropriation, of moneys received from Central Government :FOR THE OCCUPATION OF THE PROPERTY belonging to persons who worked for the acquisition of the property. The criminals in control at Haringey Council placing their proteges and tutored / used criminals in the property : FOR THE THEFT OF MONEYS BELONGING TO OTHERS.

NOTE: The victim who came along to abuse our (Andrew Yiannides') time and the human-rights facilities, did not proceed with the appeal below; the appeal was never lodged at court by the abuser of Andrew's time. As a tutored mischief making LIPS crowd member he was already engaged in other scenarios, with his mates. We are publishing, in our pages, relevant and pertinent particulars of their collective activities (*Link)

IN THE  LAMBETH COUNTY COURT

Case No. LB806029

PLAINTIFF                 Carole Iris Foenander

DEFENDANT            Johan Richard Michael Foenander

 

NOTICE OF APPEAL

TAKE NOTICE that the Court will be moved on ..................day the ..................... day of ...................... 2000 at .................. to hear an APPEAL on behalf of the Defendant in this action against the ORDER of DJ RAND  whereby the said person sitting in judgement elected to act in contravention of every principle of Justice, existing Acts of Parliament, Statutory Instruments, International Law, Court Rules and Regulations, Guidelines as to conduct and duties of the legal professions to the Court and in contempt of rulings from Higher Authorities without due consideration to the Defendant’s submissions to the Court on affidavit, supported by exhibits and evidence, establishing the validity of the Defendant’s submissions and claims, that the Order relied upon and used by the legal team of the Plaintiff (as a used vehicle) intended to lead to the application and Order Appealed against in this instance, was secured as a result of fraudulent activities by the legal professions and as a result of fraudulent court proceedings instigated and secured by them through :-

(a) alleged hearings proper behind closed doors in contravention of Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights, hereinafter abbreviated to ECoHR,

(b) violations of Article 14 of the ECoHR

(c) intended and leading to violations of Article 1 of the First Protocol of the ECoHR through violations of Article 13 as intended and relied upon by the Plaintiff’s legal team, who secured the initiating Court Order by District Judge Maple as a result of fraudulent court activities and proceedings and in the circumstances all Orders consequential to it cannot stand as in the precedent cases pleaded on Affidavit by the Defendant (Petitioner in the original action) establish through the rulings of Higher Authorities whereby the confirmation that none is above the Law and the ultimate determination that "Fraud Vitiates Judgements" as qualified in the words of LJ Denning in the Lazarus Estates Ltd. -v- Beasley case and also in the Nixon -v- Loundes case.

AND THE DEFENDANT PLEADS the following precedent cases in support of this application :-

A.  Myers -v- Elan (House of Lords ruling attached to duties of solicitors to Court, as officers of the Supreme Court). (*Link to 40 years on)

B.  The Zincroft Engineering Ltd. -v- Sphere Drake Insurance plc case whereby the Court of Appeal determined that a party to the proceedings could plead fraud to set aside judgement and adduce substantial evidence of the fraud pleaded.

C. Hudson -v- Hudson case, which the police have been investigating for some time because of the element of constructively engineered frauds.
    [*Link from here to an extended brief introduction to the very case, as presented, in a love letter (private & non-disclosed communication from an allegedly concerned researcher) submissions (?) to the Commissioner of the Metropolitan Police by Suzon Forscey Moore of the Campaign for a Fair Hearing. Read there, of 'fair comment by human-rights on the very issue of the convenient defaults & failings to ensure the taxpayers ARE informed of the criminal activities and the blunt failures by officers of justice : the police and the judiciary. *Link also from here to an explicit Court of Appeal ruling]

D. The Geoffrey Harold Scriven case whereby in the Scriven -v- Scriven divorce proceedings the legal professions were seen to benefit from FORGERIES at and or by Court staff and or through Court officers who subsequently ignored and or endorse the false instruments indulged into and relied upon by the legal team representing Mrs Scriven in that instance.
    [*Link from here to undisclosed activities by alleged challengers of the rampant fraud through abuse of the courts facilities; we expose persons who actually take part in the very constructive frauds and do nothing else but look to the rewards under the table for playing the field, in tandem with the organisers of it all].

E. The Mr. Gerry and Mrs. Eva Adshead -v- Kevin Cummins and Martin Joseph (building contractors) also the Legal Aid Board whereby the building contractor’s claim in respect of work done by them, even though condemned by the Local Authority, had been good enough for solicitors and other parties from within the Law Enforcement Agencies, in the United Kingdom, to merit and benefit from and through theatrical productions that were indulged into by the legal circles, care of an alleged Legal Aid Certificate for and in respect of a claim that rested on the condemned work. Through the alleged legitimate Legal Aid Certificate, thereafter the constructively engineered conversion of assets through abuse of the Court’s processes and the blank cheques industry born of fraudulent court proceedings.

F.  R -v- Dytham whereby the Court of Appeal ruled that an officer of Justice was guilty because of the Common Law Offence of misconduct in public office and for failing to act in accordance with his duties in order to bring to justice offenders as called for in the instance at hand because of breaches under the Theft and Counterfeit Acts of Parliament arising out of the use of false instruments of account, including defective Court Orders issued without due reference to the causes, reasons and the facts upon which the authors were called upon to ‘adjudicate’ as public servants in the service of Justice and for no other cause, impartially
    [*Link from here to the Court of Appeal ruling in the Regina -v- Dytham case].

AND THE GROUNDS FOR THE APPEAL are that DJ RAND erred and was wrong to ignore the fact that the initiating Order upon which the applications to court, by the Plaintiff and her legal team, rests and are founded, was founded and rests was Appealed against and an application was lodged with the European Commission on Human Rights, the principles of which the legal team of the Plaintiff and all others who engaged in the divorce proceedings, and on appeal ignored only to endorse the fraudulent Court proceedings that lead to the ruling and Order of District Judge Maple, who contemptuously ignored and or acted against all principles of justice through reckless misconduct in public office, and abuse of same, because of lack of accountability and or to warranted supervision by the authorities in the United Kingdom who appoint to judicial office irresponsible persons and act as in the manners herein above and below stated, Pleaded and Claimed. And in this instance DJ RAND erred and or was wrong to ignore the PLEADINGS as submitted to the Plaintiffs and to the Court by the Defendant on affidavit, and that further and in particular District Judge Maple erred and or was wrong because:-

1. The Defendant and the Intervener were not notified of the intentions and or propositions of the Legal Teams and or the Court, and specifically the intentions of District Judge Maple, to deal with any aspects of the case without due adherence to the rules of procedure leading to and or during the court hearings that were conducted behind closed doors, in contravention of all principles of Justice, as and in the manner of pre-scripted scenarios enacted by the legal teams before the director in charge of the proceedings, District Judge Maple. And the Court is called to strict proof as to when and how the Defendant and the Intervener were informed and or notified of the proposed freedoms that were to take (and took) place and or to be entered into by District Judge Maple, who endorsed all manner of improprieties on record in the file pertaining to the Defendant’s Divorce Petition which the legal team of the Respondent (Plaintiff in the present application before the court) treated as the vehicle through which to indulge in fraudulent activities, with others, in anticipation of the endorsements and promotion of same: -

(1) Through contempt of the rules of procedure

(2)    Through contempt of Court Orders applied for and or secured from the Court by the Petitioner whenever  such were called for and his legal representatives were defaulting to act as instructed and or as the  occasion commanded of alleged professionals engaged in the protection of the rights of their clients, the Petitioner in the proceedings (Defendant in the application before the Court now) and the rights of the Intervener.

(3)    By Ignoring the rules and regulations attached to costs whenever the need arose to apply to court and as in the instance leading to this Appeal attached to the provisions for FIXED COSTS for the purpose of the application before the Court and issued another blank cheque through abuse of office whereby additional attempts at and or imposed conversion of the assets of the Defendant as alleged legitimate legal costs for the dishonest and in frauds engaged legal teams representing and using the Plaintiff for some ELEVEN YEARS.

(4)    By ignoring the demand by the Defendant that the Plaintiff and her legal team should provide the Defendant with a copy of the Affidavit sworn by Dianne Elizabeth Mills (acting for the Plaintiff) which affidavit was lodged at Court sometime in November / December 1999 in furtherance of the constructively engineered frauds the Plaintiff’s solicitors indulged in, unchallenged and or as aided by others.

(5)    By ignoring the fact that the agent of the legal team, representing the Plaintiff on 23rd March 2000, alleged that the Plaintiff’s legal team were not aware of the fact that the originating causes of action and the Divorce Petition were matters the Petitioner (Defendant now) lodged with the ECoHR. ..??.. RAND contemptuously IGNORING, in the process, the documented evidence attached to the affidavit of the Defendant, filed and lodged at Court for the purposes of the hearing before DJ RAND on the day.

(6)    By ignoring the documented evidence that for the purposes of the purported Divorce proceedings / hearings, as directed and entertained by District Judge Maple, the Plaintiff’s legal team submitted and lodged FALSE STATEMENTS OF ACCOUNTS by way of declarations fully intended to mislead and or to be used by the court in the course of the fraudulent proceedings, and that the false documents were relied upon and entertained as invitations of the court, in particular District Judge Maple to issue the Order upon which the Plaintiff and her legal representatives seek benefit and pecuniary advantage at the expense of the Defendant and the Intervener.

2. The Order / Judgement Appealed against contravenes all principles of Justice and was entered in contempt of the provisions of the ECoHR and the rules and regulations governing the conduct of solicitors who secured the Originating Judgement / Order under the circumstances herein above and below Pleaded, Challenged and claimed by the Defendant.

3. The Originating Judgement / Order discriminates against the Defendant and the Intervener because of and through the railroading and hijacking practices of the legal professions, as were entertained CONSCIOUSLY and or with intent by persons acting in a judicial capacity who allowed the legal professionals the liberties to act as they did and as can be established through diligent reference to the Orders issued and granted to the Defendant (Petitioner) throughout the protracted Divorce proceedings the Defendant instigated in the first instance in 1988. And the Defendant hereby pleads the case Perry -v- Yiannides when similar attempts and denials of rights were contemplated, were entered into and the Court's processes were wrongly used; subsequently the Court rescinding erroneously and wrongly entered / motivated / entertained / secured Orders and reversed a Judgement thereafter leading to the Schooling of Judges on racism.

4. The Defendant hereby also pleads the case Korytsas -v- Demetri when the Court, and others were abusing the Court's facilities (and Legal Aid Funding for years) before the Legal teams on both sides were caused to abandon the theatrical productions they had entered into, and a settlement was secured by agreement between the parties following attempts to intimidate and threaten one of the parties with imprisonment for alleged/promoted contempt of Court which the offending parties abandoned following a succinct and explicit Appeal and communications to those who sought to abuse the Court's processes for other purposes than the service of Justice through Parliament's Laws, the facts of the case and the principles of unbiased Justice administered by truly impartial and independent of other influences and or undisclosed policies and practices persons holding 'Judicial office'.

5. That the Order / Judgement as entered into through the theatrical scenarios, behind closed doors before District Judge Maple, could not and ought not be allowed to stand in as much as that it is a vehicle secured (by the legal team representing and using the Plaintiff) through deceptions on the court and or through abuse of the court’s processes while acting in collusion with the persons allegedly representing and or acting in the interests of the Defendant (Petitioner in the divorce proceedings) and or because the solicitors representing both parties in the divorce proceedings did rely on the suppression of material facts from and or as allowed by officers of the court in the constructive frauds enterprises and the activities of which officers of the Court were fully aware of and or diligently recognised, commented upon, admonished the offenders and in fact dismissed the solicitors Hartwig & Co., who at the time purportedly were acting for and on behalf of the Defendant (Petitioner in the Divorce proceedings). Concealment and suppression of material facts as supported by documented evidence filed at Court, for pecuniary advantage and or leading to theft of properties, including rights in law, are indictable offences. Using and relying upon the false documents which the Plaintiff’s solicitors introduced, filed and caused to be used and relied upon in the court proceedings by contemptuously ignoring the documents filed at court by the Defendant (Petitioner in the divorce proceedings), in support of and evincing the TRUTH and the facts in all relevant matters, amounted and amount to criminal activities and recklessness in contempt of all principles of Justice, also misconduct in public office by the parties who entertained and endorsed the practices and policies that violate and breach the rights of one or the other and or both parties in court proceedings as provided for and guaranteed under Article 14 of the ECHR. The aforesaid Article covering equality of the sexes in RIGHTS and RESPONSIBILITIES (as the law provides) which issues the legal circles systematically ignore in matrimonial cases on issues and matters raised in the Courts in the United Kingdom. The Defendant herein draws the attention of the Court to the provisions of Article 14 in conjunction with the provisions of Article 11, the latter covering "....freedom of association with others .... for the protection of his interests...", specifically apply in the case at hand because the Defendant has been caused and is forced to act in person before the Courts in the United Kingdom, because of suppressions of material facts and evidence and because of defaults, omissions and or direct acts, such as the false statements of accounts introduced, filed and or secured, by persons in the legal circles who have been seen to benefit from assured freedoms to ignore Parliaments laws and the guidelines and the rules of the relevant governing bodies in matters attached to the application of law by and at court.

6.  DJ RAND erred and or was wrong to discriminate against the Defendant, in as much as that the Order Appealed against is clearly endorsed with an Order for costs which DJ RAND awarded to the Plaintiff’s legal representative as ‘an additional blank cheque award’ through impositions on the assets of the Defendant by DJ RAND who ignored the regulations and rules on fixed costs in the matters attached to the application before the Court on the day. On the occasion DJ RAND ignoring the rules on the costs applicable on the day and that discrimination in any form and or on any grounds is covered by the Articles of the ECoHR as submitted to the Court and Pleaded on affidavit. And that the Court ( in the person of DJ RAND) to contemplate and or to entertain any notion of positive discrimination in favour of the legal representatives of the Plaintiff in the matter of costs attached to the application was in contempt of the rules and regulations. The aforesaid breach of the rules by DJ RAND also breached and violated the rights of the Defendant as provided for under Article 1 of the First Protocol of the ECoHR.

7. That following the pleadings and submissions by the Defendant DJ RAND erred and or was wrong to ignore the matters raised by the Defendant, and DJ RAND ought to have applied herself to the facts of the case; in particular to the documents attached to the affidavit handed to her (as the Defendant’s submissions of the day *Link to another case) establishing fraudulent activities by the legal circles leading to the hearings before District Judge Maple, who entertained hearings behind closed doors, gagged the Defendant, failed to hear evidence in support of the Intervener’s rights and acted as invited by the legal representatives of the Petitioner and the Respondent alone [*Link from here to Footnote 2 and FIND OUT, WHY & WHAT FOR, the theatrical production for/on the day], who, at all material times, were in command and control of the matters before the court. District Judge RAND conscious of and or within her knowledge the fact that the Petitioner’s solicitors had NOT ISSUED A BRIEF TO THEIR AGENT IN COURT, Barrister Flori O'Donoghue, who to all intends and purposes allegedly was representing the interests of the Petitioner whereas the aforesaid barrister was acting in contempt of the rights of the Petitioner in full knowledge that he could be protected under the ill-conceived and ill-designed ASSUMED AND BESTOWED RIGHTS TO PROTECTION through undisclosed (to the parties in court proceedings) ‘immunity for work done by barristers for and on behalf of parties in court proceedings’ irrespective of the barrister’s conduct, behaviour and or part in ‘blunt and blatant constructive frauds in the course of court proceedings AND HEARINGS’. DJ RAND and or any other, could not and ought not to have ignored and or overlook matters attached to practice directions and the rules succinctly raised in the guide to the Professional conduct of solicitors. Solicitors, in the instance at hand, ignoring it all as well as statutory principles and provisions of Law, National and International, that the United Kingdom and its Parliament subscribe to through membership of the United Nations, the European Community and through ratification of the ECoHR, especially when specific violations of the last were and herein yet again are pleaded as indulged and entertained. [*Link from here to the exclusive page where we expose the arrangements in place for 'double constructive frauds on the budget, the taxpayers, the suckers who pay for it all).

8.  The Court ought not and cannot suppress the Pleadings (*Footnote 3) and or obstruct the Defendants without dealing with and or hearing the fundamental 'facts of life' within the United Kingdom until such time as the Court can establish and produce evidence that the United Kingdom Government and Parliament have authorised and suctioned the use of the Courts' processes in order to impose on the public 'Robin Hood practices and indulgences' at the expense of the uninformed and unsuspecting members of the public who recognise the wrongs, are affected and or defrauded of their assets while the authorities ignore the criminal in intent activities by the legal professions, on the grounds that the issues are matters before the courts and therefore not subject to the criminal code and or Laws enacted by Parliament. And DJ RAND, through breaches and misconduct in public office, acting in contravention of every principle of Law and Justice, especially after the submitted evidence attached to the affidavit handed to the DJ established the blunt criminal activities of the parties. DJ RAND, and others before her, determined were of no concern to the authorities, one and all to issue the criminals with blank cheques (to be drawn out of the accounts and or to be cashed against the assets of the Defendant and the Intervener) as the reckless award for costs on 23 March was intended to be.

9. The Court in the person of DJ RAND was duty bound to report to the authorities the issue of misconduct and fraudulent activities by members of the legal professions, as the documented evidence attached to the affidavit of the Defendant establishes through diligent reference to and on perusal of the false documents the Plaintiff’s solicitors prepared and submitted to Court whereby they, on behalf of their client, FALSELY DECLARED that the Defendant failed to furnish them with details of his financial state and earnings.

AND THE DEFENDANTS WILL SEEK THE FOLLOWING ORDERS:-

I. An Order setting aside the Order of 23 March 2000

II. An Order declaring that all Orders entered into behind closed doors and or entertained behind the back of the Defendant and the Intervener in respect of their properties and their legal rights, consequential to the Judgement Order entered into by District Judge Maple in the proceedings, as and in the manner herein above pleaded, be stayed until such time as an investigation proper is conducted by the authorities in the United Kingdom, and or until such time as the Defendant’s Petition to the ECoHR be addressed by the European Court of Human Rights. (*Link to the evidence tat the fraudster, for whom the appeal hereto, had already committed himself to endorsement of the arrangements in place while he was abusing our time simply to put pressure on the offenders).

III. An Order directing ALL PUBLIC SERVANTS, and members of the legal professions who acted in the matters raised herein and in the course of the Court proceedings leading to this present application and Appeal to Court, to afford to the Defendant and his authorised representatives, full and unhindered access to all files, documents, entries and records relative to and attached to the proceedings AS OF THE ONSET when the Defendant instructed solicitors to institute Divorce proceedings returnable on the Plaintiff, whom the legal circles used as their vehicle through which to defraud the Defendant and the Intervener of their rights in law, their properties and to steal their rights to a life without impositions by the dishonest and the deceitful who grossly misconduct their affairs in collusion with one another and or through the established practices all have been benefiting from for decades if not centuries. Pecuniary advantage and illicit gains through and because public servants treat matters ad nauseum and misconduct in public office in contempt of Parliament’s Laws and through gross violations of the provisions of national and international Law. RIGHTS and freedoms guaranteed to the citizens of the United Kingdom breached and violated, and the citizens subjected to imposed thefts of their properties (including peace of mind) and conversion of their assets to alleged legitimate court orders and costs orders through abuse of the court’s processes as the Defendant and his brother (the Intervener) have been subjected to, over the last 12 years.

IV. An Order Directing and or inviting District Judge Maple to provide the Court and the Defendant with details of xxx calculations as the foundations of his determination that the Defendant ought to transfer and or remit an amount equal to the value of the sum of £30,000 as acceptable to him and applicable in the circumstances prevailing at the time when the matters were pleaded and raised in court before him. And that District Judge Maple do qualify whether the court bundles lodged at court and the rights of the Intervener and in particular the grounds upon which District Judge Maple determined that the Plaintiff was entitled to such financial rewards as he determined and that do do state and produce any evidence the Plaintiff’s legal team (the Respondent in the divorce proceedings) provided to HIS COURT covering her contributions to the acquisition of the property that the legal circles treated as the only matrimonial asset to be targeted in their quest for asset stripping and deprivation of rights to the targeted Defendant (Petitioner in the Divorce proceedings) and the Intervener who acquired the targeted property jointly while the Plaintiff (Respondent) was living with another man, as indeed the Respondent subsequently, yet again, entered into after returning to live with and at the expense of the Defendant and the Intervener for over six years. AND THAT District Judge Maple do qualify as to how the facts of the case at hand were treated by him as provided by and under Article 14 of the ECoHR and Article 1 of the First Protocol of same.

V. An Order directing and or inviting District Judge Maple to state as to whether or not he took into account the behaviour of the Plaintiff (Respondent in the divorce proceedings) as provided for by the rules in matrimonial proceedings, as attached to the division of assets, in his determination of the financial ‘reward’ to the Plaintiff. And that the Court do satisfy itself that District Judge Maple issued an appropriate Order in consideration of the true facts and the evidence the Court should of its own motion now direct that the matters and the evidence attached to the divorce proceedings be reviewed and be determined diligently in accordance with the rules that were flaunted and or discarded by the legal circles and the individuals who indulged into fraudulent activities with a view to cause damages and to convert the assets of the Defendant and his brother to themselves through use of the Respondent’s position as an alleged wife proper meriting much more under their own practice rules than the facts and the provisions of Article 1 of the ECoHR provides for and guarantees to BOTH SEXES without discrimination and or bias on any grounds under Article 14 of the ECoHR.

VI. An Order directing and or inviting District Judge Maple to provide the Court, the authorities (the Lord Chancellor’s private office and the Home Secretary’s private office) with details of the assets of the Plaintiff (the Respondent in the divorce proceedings) at the relevant time when he entered into the Judgement Order as arranged and or as was organised between the legal circles who entertained notions that one of the sexes has responsibilities (invariably the male) and the other sex has rights (invariably the female) in gross violation of the provisions of Article 14 of the ECoHR, and that District Judge Maple be invited to qualify his determination and to state under what circumstances his ruling that the Intervener should be deprived of his properties for the benefit of the Plaintiff who did not invest in the property that District Judge Maple determined the Plaintiff had rights to, irrespective of her other interests, investments and rights to properties, which issues the legal circles suppressed and or conveniently negated to provide to the court care of the freedoms granted to them to ignore Court Orders and or as District Judge Maple entertained through the interventions of barrister Flori O'Donohue instructing District Judge Maple to ignore the Petitioner’s demands that the assets of the Respondent (in the divorce proceedings) be taken into consideration by the Court.

VII. An Order and or directions inviting District Judge Maple to state and provide the Court and the Defendant with a written statement qualifying the reasons and the grounds upon which he allowed and or permitted the representatives of the Plaintiff (Respondent in the Divorce proceedings) to subject the Defendant (Petitioner in the divorce proceedings) to continuous and permanent RACIAL harassment and abuse in the course of the four day hearings before him, and that District Judge Maple should qualify what purposes the harassment and abuse served and what relevance the racial issues raised by the legal representative in Court of the Plaintiff (Respondent in the divorce proceedings) had and or contributed to the matters before the court safe to USE UP AND WASTE COURT TIME in the interests of such matters.

VIII. An Order directing and or inviting District Judge Maple to justify the purpose of the meeting he had in private with Mr. Justice Singer in the presence of the legal team of the Plaintiff in contravention of the principles on impartiality and that no contacts with the parties and or their representatives prior to and or during court proceedings should take place. The said private contacts and arrangements causing the Defendant (Petitioner in the Divorce proceedings) to raise issue when lodging his Petition to the ECoHR following determination, by the Court of Appeal in the United Kingdom, that the conduct of the proceedings and the Order / ruling / determination by District Judge Maple was flawed because, among the other issues raised herein, the fact that prior to sitting in on the case District Judge Maple was party to the aforesaid private meeting with Mr. Justice Singer who thereafter sat in on the Appeal necessitated and warranted on issue of the Order / Judgement / Determination of District Judge Maple following the constructively engineered theatrical presentations by the parties who appeared before him after they transferred the case to his court from Croydon County Court following the admonitions District Judge Palmer directed at the solicitors. The offenders transferring the case to their chosen venue where they were allowed to indulge, among other issues, in blatant verbal racial assaults on and at the expense of the Defendant with the blessings of District Judge Maple even though the issues were irrelevant to the proceedings before the Court as District Judge Maple ought to have recognised and not allow the abusers of the Court’s processes and freedoms so to indulge in pursuit of ‘use of the court’s time yet evade to deal diligently and properly with the finances of BOTH PARTIES at the time and as the records at Court show that the Defendant (Petitioner) secured and had submitted to the Legal circles for use and consideration by the Court. At all material times with due consideration as to the provisions of Article 14 of the ECoHR, as opposed to the practices the Defendant was subjected to by the legal circles in the United Kingdom, for over 6 years.
   [*Link [*L] from here to an important element of law which 'the recognised fraudsters club recruit' was not informed of by us]

IX. An Order Ordering the Plaintiff’s legal representatives to submit to the Court and to the Defendant the reasons why they systematically acted in contempt of the rules of procedure, defaulted to provide and submit full particulars of their client’s financial affairs and why they never complied with the Court Orders the Defendant, as Petitioner applied for and secured, while their colleagues in arms purportedly were acting for and representing the Defendant yet enjoined with them in the generation of such applications at the expense of the time of the Defendant, subsequently to seek financial rewards thereafter as alleged legitimate work ‘warranted through their joint defaults and omissions’ as alleged legitimate legal costs, fees and charges chargeable to and to be met by the Defendant (Petitioner in the Divorce proceedings) care of persons who misconduct in public office when sitting in a Judicial capacity.

IX. An Order directing and or inviting District Judge Maple to state the grounds and reasons upon which he Ordered that the Defendant (Petitioner in the divorce proceedings) should meet the costs of the Divorce proceedings and to state the grounds upon which he so determined and furthermore to state what, if any, references were made by him to the Court file wherein the records of the multitude of applications by the Defendant (Petitioner in the Divorce Proceedings) necessitated and attributed to defaults by the Plaintiff (Respondent in the Divorce proceedings) and her legal representatives who systematically failed to adhere to the rules of procedure and AS ORDERED BY THE COURT by persons who defaulted, at the relevant times, to take into consideration the defaults of the Plaintiff and her solicitors to adhere to Court procedures and or act as ordered by the Court leading to indiscriminate use of ‘discretionary powers’ as to costs and the Order of District Judge Maple evinces.

X. An Order Ordering Lawford & Co., the representative of the Plaintiff (Respondent in the Divorce proceedings) to provide evidence in support of the negotiations they took part in, in matters attached to and in respect of the assets of BOTH PARTIES IN THE DIVORCE PROCEEDINGS. And the Plaintiff and her solicitors to provide copies of all communications they exchanged with the solicitors acting for and on behalf of the Defendant (Petitioner in the Divorce proceedings) establishing the grounds upon which the Plaintiff and Lawford & Co., negotiated within reasons and the documented facts and the evidence in the matter of the assets of both parties before applying for and securing an alleged Legal Aid Certificate through which vehicle the license to indulge in theatrical productions and the suppression of material facts and EVIDENCE.

XI. An Order Ordering Lawford & Co., to lodge and file at court and to submit copies to the Defendant (Petitioner in the divorce proceedings) of the application by the Plaintiff (Respondent in the Divorce proceedings) to the Legal Aid Board wherein the grounds and the reasons stated as to why the application and the need for the theatrical scenario and presentations before District Judge Maple behind closed doors through suppression of material facts, by the legal circles, leading to and or omissions endorsed by the Court to deal properly with the facts and the evidence attached to and arising out of the documented facts in respect of the financial position and state of both parties in the proceedings. And that the submissions to the Legal Air Board be proven by way of Certified copies of all communications exchanged between Lawford & Co. and the Legal Aid Board.

XII. An Order Ordering the legal representatives of the Plaintiff (Respondent in the divorce proceedings) to deliver up to the court copies of the correspondence they exchanged with the insurers of the targeted property and to furnish copies to the Defendant (Petitioner in the divorce proceedings) and to produce any evidence that their client ever took any interest in the property and or invested in its acquisition and or towards the insurance premiums as an assumed beneficiary only without commitments. And that Lawford & Co. do also deliver up to the Court and the Defendant (Petitioner copies of all communications they exchanged with estate agents they instructed to issue valuations and instructions to MARKET the property at the valuations they thus secured and were relying upon to promote their constructively engineered frauds on the Court and on the Defendant and his brother. And that the solicitors Lawford & Co. do submit copies of their submissions and responses in respect of settlement negotiations in respect of the finances and matrimonial assets between the parties in the divorce proceedings.

Dated this the ................... day of ............................. 2000

 

Signed...............................................
Mr. Johan Michael Foenander
xxxxx xxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxx xxxxxxxx
xxxxxxxxxxxx
xxxxxxxx
xxxxx xxx

TO THE COURT with extra copy for service by the Court on the Plaintiffs on completion as to date and time.

Mr. Johan Michael Foenander
xxxx xxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxx
xxxxxxxxxxxxx
xxxxxxxxx
xxxx xxx

FOOTNOTE common to most web-pages at this website
MOST IMPORTANT:- In October 2010, the coalition Government's Attorney General, in an interview published by 'COUNSEL' the mothly legal banter magazine, specifically spoke of the police distancing themselves from cases of (small-fry) fraud and he asserted that he was making that element his department's priority*

*Link from here to the evidence.

IT REMAINS TO BE SEEN, WHAT the coalition of the Con-LibDems, THE GOVERNMENT OF THE DAY WILL IN FACT ATTEND TO THE RAMPANT FRAUD, and IF IT WILL DEAL with the criminals who abuse public office, especially when faced with appropriate submissions and claims that will be delivered in due course. Visitors/readers are urged to read the article published in the London Evening Standard, as settled by the Rt. Hon. David Blunkett, Home Secretary in 2003
*Link from here to the article we reproduce in another webpage and consider "Why tolerate the arrogance of the legal circles who had and have the audacity to assert to the lawmakers that they, the lawmakers have nothing to do with the law"?
While there, above it, the explicit letter to ex-Minister, the Rt. Hon. Frank Field MP, delivered a few days earlier. ALL alleged victim-challengers who contacted Andrew Yiannides, by the time the letter was sent to the Minister, received copy of the letter just as they received copies of other letters submitted to government maintained Ministers and other official appointees to public office. Accessing the material pointed to from the letter (URLs) is of utmost importance. It should assist 'recognition of the citizen's rights at work', when called upon properly in truly democratic states. The above in 2003; there were other 'submissions' and among such civilised and, within the law, approaches by citizens that led to the right actions by governments, the explicit challenges when we set about exposing one of the most evil of alleged victims of the legal circles to have ever contacted us.

*Link from here to our explicit submissions to (a) the Prime Minister, (b) the Chancellor / Treasury, (c) and, the Home Secretary. We acted so after we had secured more than enough evidence about the parts of an alleged victim whose only interests were (i) the rewards under the table FOR KEEPING QUIET about the ORGANISED FRAUD THROUGH ABUSE OF THE COURTS' FACILITIES and (ii) her parts in blunt attempts that were intended to discredit the person she was sent along to mess about with, Mr Andrew Yiannides.

Access please the letter to the Home Secretary, the Rt. Hon. Jack Straw, in December 1998

*Link from here to the letter

& note the results evinced in the newspaper article (Hornsey Journal) also within days of the letter reaching its destination. Many the charlatans and stooges -lovers and 'promoters of the system as is'- on the job for decades; one and all acting as sold souls always do

*Link from here to the evidence we point to relative to the parts of one of a number of sold to the system fraudsters who were sent along / introduced to Andrew Yiannides by the managers / organisers of the LIPS crowd / mob..

PAGE FOOTNOTES:-

   1.    On 29th July 2004 we heard of Lord Justice Thorpe, Lord Justice Waller and Lady Justice Arden, that among other issues they addressed in a divorce case the following; "....pleaded (fine sweet word) to start talking and said that he (Lord Justice Thorpe uttering the words) would put the court's mediation service at their full disposal. WHY have the parties engaged on this insane litigation given the sad fact that their marriage has fallen through and sensible arrangements must be made for the future?" he said. These sorts of wars of attrition are very bad for children (wow, *Link [*L] to our words for almost three decades). It would be far, far better if they entered into mediation". [*Link [*L] from here to a case when human-rights set out to create the right 'precedent case through which to expose the charlatans and stooges, those who join the fraudsters club and take part in theatrical productions intended to impress the suckers who are drawn in, in order to watch disgraceful productions such as the one - in February 2000 - when the fraudster for whom the appeal in this page, played the most evil of the parts he engaged in, in the course of his contacts with Andrew. No need to emphasise the fact that the person was acting simply as an agent, promoter and supporter / user of the criminal in intent arrangements in place, the arrangements for the double constructive frauds on the taxpayers, as we expose in our pages [*Link [*L] to the exclusive page where all is laid bare].
   2.   Visitors, readers and researchers should *link [*L] from here to and read the FAX sent to the European Court of Human Rights in respect of the case that was settled and submitted to the court by the founder of human-rights.org, Mr Andrew Yiannides. The PETITION was delivered personally by Mr Yiannides, who travelled to Strasbourg by coach, in order to ensure that a similar scenario as the one promoted in 1997 was not likely to arise. The victim, Ms Jesus Rosalia Baldwin De Castillo was told at the time, that the pleadings and submissions contained elements that created a situation whereby THE FOOT WOULD BE INSIDE THE DOOR of the ECHR, and, that the elements would be used in the event *the usual promotions in respect of admissibility* were to be raised / used by persons representing and or acting on behalf of the ECHR. The victim / petitioner was not given further information and no clarification was to be offered if Mr Yiannides was asked to do so. When the usual promotions were received, by the victim, from the ECHR and referred to Mr Yiannides (by the Petitioner / victim) the FAX we publish in our pages was sent to the court. The staff / officers thereafter COMPLIED WITH THE DEMANDS evinced in the FAX. When the documents were returned to London, Mr Yiannides, who by then benefited from release of ALL of the Petitioner's documents (as had been the agreement between the victim / Petitioner and Mr Yiannides) simply asked of the Petitioner / victim to endorse a Power of Attorney Instrument appointing and empowering Mr Yiannides to proceed with her rights as ASSURED IN INTERNATIONAL LAW, and specifically under the provisions of the European Convention. Mr Yiannides HAD MADE IT CLEAR, as of the onset, that he was familiar with all ploys used and that his main concern (as far as the victim and he was concerned) NO ONE SHOULD BE ALLOWED or be given any opportunities to assert that Mr Yiannides was involved in or promoting / supporting unfounded allegations - HENCE THE ABSOLUTE ESSENTIAL that all evidence and documents were to be his and his alone to use as he saw fit especially after a Petition were to lodged at the ECoHR : Strasbourg [*Link also from here to the suppressed realities as organised by the criminals who are and have been in control of the courts facilities for decades that Andrew Yiannides (creator of this web-site & originator of the concept of a Community on Line to challenge & expose the abusers of trust and the courts facilities) recognised and knows of as of 1972. Readers & researchers who may be interested in the to roots and foundations upon which the organised fraud and criminal activities should *link [*L] from here to the page where we apply evidence relevant to the foundations and the organised abusers of trust].     
 
3.    Precisely as the fraudster Johan Michael Richard Foenander had been engaging in, as instructed and sent along by the gurus and controllers who were / are 'managing and directing the fraudsters club recruits / agents' going about by the title of LIPS, the Litigants In Person Society crowd/mob. [*Link [*L]
from here to the revealing content of a letter that the fraudster wrote to 'another victim(!) Mr Geoffrey Harold Scriven. The author used that letter as part of his impressive understanding of the evil forces at work BUT PRIMARILY as part of his 'subliminal indoctrination retainer']. Consider the fact that the fraudster suppressed such realisations and realities by failing to act as he contacted us for in the first instance = to publish the facts and the evidence in his own case in a personal web-site. He 'conveniently defaulted / failed to act as he 'allegedly intended to do', thereby acting in contempt of the law and his duty to report crime to the authorities. Need we to mention that he simply acted in breech of his assertions and declarations to us, for and because of which he secured our support and assistance 'under false pretences' = typical of the LIPS crowd/mob fraudsters [* Link to our exclusive revelations, exposing 'Lessons To Be Learned By Examples Stated In The Most Evil of Works Ever Published']. (NOTE: Such persons, always too keen to impress the suckers they are instructed to target. [*Link to how one G Ebert set about promoting rubbish (a letter he was provided with by the police at Charring Cross) and consider how we got to the bottom of it all DESPITE HIS OBSTRUCTIONS and his vile part as 'another subliminal indoctrination operative'].
    4.   A number of cases covered in our pages relate to, or were before judicial chair occupants, who were / are  operating at Edmonton County Court. By far the majority of cases relate to the CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUDS INSTIGATED BY LOCAL AUTHORITY staff and officers who were / are trained to rely on abusers of the courts facilities in order to impose on 'the serfs' the type of societies that are created through the courts, as we cover in our pages. A page with introduction and links to each case and element will be released in due course.   
    5.   We cover a number of cases and issues in our pages that relate to the Royal courts of Justice and a page with introduction to each case and each element will be released in due course. Use of the search facility at the site will throw up many references to the RCJ and we apologise for our failure to introduce the page by now.
    6.   *Link from here to a page where we publish a transcript when a District Judge was challenged to stand down on the grounds that THE DJ. WAS ACTING IN CONTEMPT OF THE LAW. The challenge, after the DJ exhibited such mentalities and audaciously intimidated / threatened Mr Andrew Yiannides for alleged contempt of court - her court of course, on a day when the DJ was misconducting the court's business.
[The Link takes one straight to the aforesaid part of the theatrical production for the day] It is advisable for the serious readers, researchers and the victims to read the whole of the transcript first and thereafter the page material, as we expand on the issues that arose as of first contact with the victims(?) who were sent along by a person who failed to honour commitments and undertakings, even though the person benefited from extensive assistance for years; the person had to acknowledge such benefits, after another dreamer, one Mrs. Helen Patey, exhibited her true colours as an abuser of Mr Andrew Yiannides' time; needless to say the dreamer and alleged Freemason basher, was sent along by the puke production machine & maintenance engineer of the system, Mr James Todd of VOMIT repute, the subliminal indoctrination productions weekly]..   
   7.   Genuine victims, concerned visitors and readers / researchers wishing for additional information, as regards the foundations of our conclusions should contact Mr Andrew Yiannides / webmaster@uk-human-rights.org after accessing and reading the material realities and the recorded historical facts no one can alter: -

       (1) http://www.uk-human-rights.org/convicti.htm#Star
       (2) http://www.uk-human-rights.org/confraud.htm#propagation
       (3) http://www.uk-human-rights.org/humraped.htm#2006
       (4) http://www.uk-human-rights.org/2lipstalk.htm#Converts
       (5) http://www.uk-human-rights.org/4suckers.htm#CORRUPT  
       (6) http://www.uk-human-rights.org/abuse.htm#prepare
       (7) http://www.uk-human-rights.org/contract.htm#student
   8.   We refer victims, serious readers and researchers to the page where we published a FAX transmission to the European Court of Human Rights. The communication was called for, after Ms. Jesus Rosalia Baldwin De Castillo, - a member of the Community on Line - received a letter from the Court. The letter was from the very (Miss, Ms, Mrs ?) K. Reid (of the English Section at the Commission / Court). Such letters, in similar terms, many a Petitioner (to the ECHR) had been / are running around promoting to persons (victims) they target. The letters serve as part of the conditioning & subjugation of 'the serfs' (the targeted 'sons of men on planet earth). We refer to the conditioning & subjugation of illiterates in law to the powers that be. All in aid of and FOR THE ORGANISED FRAUD APLENTY through false fronts and plenty of fraudulent misrepresentations, DECEPTIVE SCENARIOS & DOCUMENTS, such as the letter the member received. Persons who have NOT ACCESSED the exclusive page where we state and cover the method of operations SHOULD DO SO WITHOUT FAIL [*Link to the page from here] BEFORE PROCEEDING TO the page where we published our FAX challenges to the European Court of Human Rights. We hasten to state and emphasise the fact that 'the victim' who benefited from a CoL website, and a great deal of work for / in the courts, all the way to and including THE PETITION TO THE ECrtHR, had been asked to execute / endorse a Power of Attorney Instrument which Mr. Andrew Yiannides was to use in order to challenge the arrogant abuse of the Courts' facilities FOR CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUDS ON THE CITIZENS, including the REWARDS to morons who agree to keep quiet about their part IN CONFIDENTIAL THEFT & DISTRIBUTION OF BUDGET FUNDS, consequential to the usual manifestations, BLUNT CRIMINAL ACTIVITIES, at in and through the courts instigated, promoted and processed ALL THE WAY TO the European Court of Human Rights. Only parties to the activities and illiterates in law, morons, zombies fail to recognise WHY the victim (!) failed to execute the Power of Attorney she was handed & received later, by email, too. The transmission, AFTER she sold her flat in London and shot off to destinations not disclosed (address proper) in Spain. The following facts should assist any illiterates in law to conclude accordingly: (a) the victim HANDED OVER (as had been agreed from the onset) ALL OF THE PAPERS pertaining to her tribulations in the courts, with solicitors, barristers, the Law Society also her MP's indifference to the complaints raised by the constituent. (b) The victim had been told that through the STATED FACTS, as submitted to the ECrtHR (the Petition itself), also care of the DUTIES OF JUDICIAL CHAIR OCCUPANTS, enough had been put on record / submitted to the Court in Strasbourg. Through such realities and the letter she received from Strasbourg, the offenders who have been busy creating the New World Order Code of Morals and Ethics would be challenged OPENLY & WOULD BE EXPOSED in the public domain. Mankind, humans, THINKERS need to be jolted out of the dream-states, to awake, to snap out of the intoxicated states of confusion which states the sold to the system as is, the system the promoters convert to, as corrupted 'conditioned morons', busy expanding it all for years. (c) The 'victim' when contacted by another victim of the legal circles (ANOTHER WOMAN VICTIM OF THE DIVORCE INDUSTRY, male sucker-victims of alleged organised men's groups, NOTE), She forwarded a copy of the email from the other victim (who visited the CoL website created by Mr Andrew Yiannides) AND CONVENIENTLY she withheld the email address of the other victim. Need one to search for some gifted guru to inform us WHY the deliberate failure to assist the other victim, by linking the new victim to the only person who openly challenges and exposes abusers of trust and public office? (d) The assisted 'victim' also failed, without justifiable cause or reason to endorse an affidavit she was asked to execute as a witness to events she was present at, at the Land Registry. The events / disclosure of suppressed activities, pertaining to FRAUDULENT IN INTENT INEXCUSABLE RECORDS, CRIMINAL ACTIVITIES within the Land Registry constituting extensions of the criminal activities, indulged into through abuse of the courts facilities, for and in which another Public Service was party to, also. ALL OF WHICH AMOUNTed / AMOUNT TO ORGANISED CRIMES AGAINST THE TARGETED SERFS (humanity = the sons of men of planet earth) as planned for 'the sons of men', centuries / millennia ago. The CoL member had been informed that Mr. Andrew Yiannides recognised as of the time when the managers, organisers and controllers of the Litigants In Person Society, contacted him, miraculously, within days of Mr Yiannides submissions, the lodging of an appropriate appeal at Bow County Court {*linked to from here]. Visitors who have acquainted themselves with the aforesaid recorded -as reported in the public domain-, facts, events and realities should *link from here to the FAX we refer to at the beginning of this footnote and benefit from the full picture; all should get to know of the scenarios / productions in which many an alleged victim-challenger who has (allegedly) been stitched up and let down by the system, engage in, FOR USE OF OTHER VICTIMS (to whom they are pointed, as one Saheed Hussein was pointed by the legal circles to Mr. Johan Michael Richard Foenander. All and everything in aid of and FOR THE CASH UNDER THE TABLE ARRANGEMENTS by the creators of the system and the craft-y one's behind the New World Order Code of Moral and Ethics.
   9.   We invite victims, visitors and, in particular, readers & researchers to access from here (above) the letter from Mr Johan Michael Richard Foenander's solicitor, Antons of Haringey. We request of all to NOTE THE DATE when the solicitor wrote in such terms as the solicitor wrote to one of the abusers of trust solicitors who indulged in the usual constructive frauds through fraudulent activities. One and all should THEN CONSIDER what the police disclosed -to Mr Johan Foenander- WHEN, AS THEY DISCLOSED IN THEIR THE POLICE INTERVIEWED Mr Hussein. Mr Hussein being the chap who introduced Mr Foenander to the fraud aplenty through abuse of the courts facilities  SO LONG AS ONE DANCES TO THE SA ME TUNES as orchestrated by the legal circles and abusers of judicial chair occupation.      
   10. .   
   11.   .   
   12.  

Back to Home Page To family.uk-human-rights.org/ To List of Affiliated web-sites To List of Web-sites Where Evil Practices ARE Exposed 
Link to:  The Breeding Grounds - attempts the R-v-Dytham-case a Court of Appeal PRECEDENT the Frank Cunningham successful Challenges
Link to:  Corrupt Britain     Scriven cases the Norman  Scarth cases & inexcusable abuse of trust  the Police Summons the Victim who Challenged successfully
Link to:  Solicitors give wrong advice  the Stephen Lawrence SAGA & DISGRACED operations the arrogantly ORGANISED FRAUD & CORRUPTION
Link to:  Housing Benefit Frauds Industry   an Illiterate in English & a 'routine push button response'    Misconduct in Public Office a police officer defaults - charged
Link to:  The manipulative fraudsters from within the legal system  Updated pages    the Justice Blind  headlines   The CAMILA Project invitation & information

...

  •   Back to HomePage     
  • ... 

    The creator of this website was inviting victims to access URrights & join him there with other victims to expose & challenge abusers of trust & public office until the providers of the facilities >ning.com< introduced new terms and conditions for the provision of the facilities. Access from here and read of the imposed states by the brains behind ning.com and consider only one element "WHY OBSTRUCT & HINDER THE DOWNLOAD of the existing material at URrights.ning.com >the intellectual properties of the creator of that presence on the Internet and those who joined him there? Read below of the unacceptable conduct and behaviour by the reckless abusers of trust, who set out to obstruct and blackmail the creator of URrights.ning

    Persons who are genuinely concerned and object to the ways they were / are being treated by alleged servants of the publicand the law >in any PSEUDOdemocracy, or whatever states / conditions they are subjected to< by abusers of public facilities and public office >as we cover in our web-pages< should contact webmaster@human-rights.org for information relevant to the creation of similar facilities for INFOrmation on URrights, for facilities for URrights EUrope and for a NETwork of URrights activists.

    • APOLOGIES to friends and persons who could not access URrights following the recent changes by the providers of the facility (ning.com) Andrew Yiannides created and used the portal to create the presence on the Internet for the group of victims / challengers who joined with him to expose and challenge the arrogant and blunt abuse of public services in all allegedly civilised societies > PSEUDODEMOCRACIES <.

    • The changes related to the introduction of charges for the facilities, included the facility for ning.com to archive the material at URrights; also the facility to download the archived material to the creator's system (computer) while the creator and his group of friends considered which of the level of charges and service the group was to adopt.

    • HOWEVER the creator, Andrew Yiannides, WAS UNABLE TO DOWNLOAD THE ARCHIVED MATERIAL and all attempts to engage the providers and their staff in reasonable explanation as to WHY THE FAILURES TO CONNECT / DOWNLOAD from the ning.com servers THE ARCHIVED MATERIAL, were contemptuously ignored.

    • Emails to the Publicity, to the Promotion, to the Public Relations, also to the Chief Executive's Office merited no response whatsoever from anyone acting for ning.com

    • In the circumstances Andrew will appreciate any information related to the problems covered above. Andrew will also appreciate any information relative to exchanges with or email postings, from ning.com to existing members.

    • EXISTING URrights members, victims of the legal system, victims of solicitors and the courts should access the updated pages at .org/solicitors.htm and .org/solfraud.htm by using the links from the list below.

    Below pages where we expose known lovers of it all, users and maintenance engineers of the system as is

    .org/1999dfax.htm .org/1ofmany.htm .org/2lipstalk.htm .org/4deceit.htm .org/absolute.htm .org/abusers.htm
    .org/account4.htm .org/actors.htm .org/actors2.htm .org/adoko.htm .org/bankers.htm .org/beware.htm
    .org/blunket1.htm .org/chaldep1.htm .org/confraud.htm .org/contract.htm .org/convicti.htm .org/courts.htm
    .org/corruptcourts.htm .org/crimesin.htm .org/dreamers.htm .org/evesused.htm .org/evilones.htm .org/famfraud.htm
    .org/govolso.htm .org/guesswhy.htm .org/len.htm .org/mauricek.htm .org/media.htm .org/solfraud.htm
    .org/solicitors.htm .org/someplan.htm .org/someploy.htm .org/thefacts.htm .org/theproof.htm .org/thenerve.htm
    .org/twisted.htm .org/uaccount.htm .org/ukmm.htm .org/uwatchit.htm .org/watchit1.htm .org/yourtax.htm
    • Every single person we name and expose in the above pages elected to ignore THEIR OBLIGATIONS TO REPORT (to 'the serfs' = 'the taxpayers'), THE ABUSERS OF PUBLIC OFFICE & PUBLIC FACILITIES. All were/are relying on the Intellectual Prostitutes, from within the media, to keep it all in the family closet.
    • All, as typical twin-tongue hypocrites carry on complaining about the media for failing to report & for suppressing the facts and the realities they allegdely reported to the hard of hearing, to the otherwise committed angels blowing their silent trumpets for decades, all ready and gearing to welcome the expansion of the New World Order.
    • Of such parts the contributions from and failings of the persons we name and expose, AS IF THEIR OWN SILENCE, THEIR FAILURES  & THEIR BLUNT OBSTRUCTIONS to the work and other actions by the creator of this website, Andrew Yiannides, treated by one and all as if non-existent with the exception when the wily Norman Scarth, set off to abuse the trust he was allowed to benefit from, while his parts and questionable activities / performance were under scrutiny, specifically after HE FAILED to publish the full transcript of the Court of Appeal hearing HE WAS ALLOWED TO RECORD* [*Link from here to the food for thought page created by Andrew Yiannides, in the first instance].
    • Not one ever bothered to address the issues we expose in the explicit page, despite the fact that we have been pointing all of our contacts, since May 1992, to it all.
    • Visitors, readers and researchers are urged / invited to access and read the letter which the Hon. Secretary of the Litigants In Person Society, Mr. Norman Scarth sent to the founder of human-rights, Mr. Andrew Yiannides, reproduced in the page .org/4deceit.htm* [*L]
    • The author's statements, such as 'what for and why seek additional assistance', thereby spelling out his parts as a lover of it all.
    • Common sense dictates, that he should have directed his request to his partners in deceptions aplenty, one & all engaging in fraudulent misrepresentations AND NOTED TO HAVE, WILFULLY, BEEN SUPPRESSING, FROM THE TAXPAYERS, THE FACTS OF LIFE RELATIVE TO THE RAMPANT ABUSE OF THE COURTS FACILITIES as the failure of all to co-operate as covered and pointed to at:- [*L]. One and all fallen to the facilities for fraud aplenty on the taxpayers and the corruption of illiterates in law, the conditioned victims of the legal circles & courts who fall to the blackmail element attached to the REWARD for keeping the realities away from the taxpayers; just like the media and the Ministers responsible for the application of long existing law to the criminal activities we cover in our pages, do.
    • All the while one and all were / are engaging in the scenarios we cover in the exclusive page, which page the author of the letter which Mr Norman Scarth sent to Andrew Yiannides, afforded us the opportunity to address the issue of the contributions of his partners and affiliates in fraud aplenty on the taxpayers; despite the reminder one and all, named in the new page simply shoved it all in the dark corners of their devoid of grey matter skulls, their perverted / corrupted mind(s)

    > MOST IMPORTANT <
    On Sunday morning, the 19th September 2010, the Deputy Prime Minister, leader of the Liberal-Democrats in the course of the BBC TV politics programme, spoke of the coalition government's commitment to address the element of waste and fraud through the public services sector. We trust and hope that the elements we expose in our pages and the parts adopted by the conditioned victims of the legal circles, the persons who engage in PROMOTING & EXPANDING THE ONGOING CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUD ON THE TAXPAYERS, THROUGH ABUSE OF THE COURTS' FACILITIES, will be on the top of the list of government priorities.
    Visitors, readers & researchers are urged to access the letters to Minister Frank Field [*L] after he had been directed by the Prime Minister to think/do the unthinkable.
    Link also from here [*L] to the explicit letter to the Home Secretary in December 1998 with submissions arising out of the RAMPANT HOUSING BENEFIT FRAUD
    On Tuesday 23rd November 2010, 'the Guardian' in its Comment & Debate page carried an article by Nick Clegg, the Deputy Prime Minister. In the evening of the same day the Deputy Prime Minister addressed a large audience at Kings place in respect of the government's changes on university students fees / loans.
    Access from here the page where we reproduce an image of 'the Guardian' article & consider the simple fact that we, alone, have been asserting and proclaiming our objections to the theft of funds from the national budget leading to the ever-increasing annual deficit in the state's balance of payments.

    ACCESS:  http://www.justice-uk.human-rights.org/ (For an important message at this Community-on-Line web-site) & thereafter,
    Access also http://www.law.society.complaints.and.human-rights.org/ (Judge instigates Fraud On Tax Payers - he knows not the difference between 'imposed' & 'no undue influence'). APOLOGIES FOR THE DISAPPEARANCE OF THIS WEBSITE.It appears that the beneficiary of the work, both for applications to the courts in the United Kingdom and the submissions to the European Court for Human Rights* [*Link from here to the Statement of Facts submitted to the ECoHR], arranged with the providers of the free web space to erase the Intellectual Property of Andrew Yiannides, the founder of the human-rights Community-on-Line, without any reference to the creator of the website and owner of the Intellectual Property!
    鼯font> Copyright subsists on all material in our web-site, owned by the authors of same.
    Visitors can refer to these pages in any non commercial activity, so long as attribution is given as to source. License to use, for commercial or other specific use of the material, shall have been secured in writing first, from the owners of any property and material from these pages. No material shall be reproduced in any form and by any means without prior agreement and or license in writing from the copyright owners. The Press are invited to contact us if they wish to publish material in the Public Interest, As We Do.
    For any problems or questions regarding this web-site contact:  webmaster
    ...