Crime - Organised -Institutionalised - Corruption - Fraud - Exposing Violations World Wide 

3rd March 2011 added link [*L] to the BBC-TV Dimbleby Lecture in 1973 as the Metropolitan 

Police Commissioner, Sir Robert Mark prepared & presented to the sucker-serfs

In October 2010 the coalition (Con-Lib-Dems) Government's Attorney General, the Rt. Hon. Dominic Grieve QC, in an interview to 'COUNSEL'* [*L] qualified that his priority was to address the issue of 'the police distancing themselves -systematically we add- in cases of fraud and directing the victims -who report such matters to the police, as the law commands- to instruct solicitors. The government (the A.G, naturally) also the media are invited to access the Dimbleby Lecture (BBC-TV November 1973) as delivered by Sir Robert Mark QPM [*L] and the page where we point to the fact -and the evidence- that TWO Lord Justices sitting at the Court of Appeal, indulged, in usual manner : in blunt and arrogant contempt for the law [*L] when addressing issues of the very nature the Metropolitan Police Commissioner himself ALSO INDULGED in over a year before the famous lecture; yet he had the audacity to refer to criminal activities, by the legal circles, such as he alluded to in the course of his Television Lecture which he delivered on TV for the sucker-serfs to ponder upon, as his contribution towards the 'dust in your eyes sheeple' services. From here link [*L] also to the case when the police created their own false records as their contribution towards the creation of false states intended to obstruct / block Andrew Yiannides from securing employment in an area he could have been contributing positively towards the creation of considerate humans / thinkers, as the material facts, including letters, published at the website evince. 

corruptbritain.htm        KEY

Corrupt Britain  * Page Revised: June 20, 2012. *
hrbnrsml.gif (1162 bytes)JOIN the Community On Line and publish your Statement of Facts and the Evidence you have. Use your rights in law (link) and ACT with others against the offenders. Join in the creation for the mass of evidence victims can put together. Crimes against humanity claims could not be ruled out for the benefit of all. Work with others for the common good and goal.

Affiliated Sites For The Above Projected Action   lbduk.org (group)


KEY to page & site
1. This Page
2. Other Site-Pages
3. This Page-QUOTES
4. Antiquity- QUOTES Page
5. Religions QUOTES Page
6. They knew a thing or 2
7. The Press / Media
8. DSS FRAUD SCANDAL
9. Offending Authorities
10. No Falsehoods
11.PublicServantsOrganise
12.They Rely on Courts to..
13. BENEFIT FREE 4 ALL
14. Police & False Records
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
26.
27.
28.
29.
30.

Page Quotes -  list
1. Law In Invisible Ink
2. Protracting for Income
3. Judges Ignore The Law
4. Independent Of Law?   
5.
They Know& IgnoreLaw
part 6
part 7
part 8
part 9
part 10

 


Below, copy of part of, page 6 from the Daily Mail of 6th November 1998.
corrupt2.jpg (76208 bytes)
Corrupt ? Pillars of Democracy ? Blaming Labour ?  Come on, read the first quote(Q1) in our HomePage and recognise WHY those words by Oliver Cromwell. Read our pages and recognise WHY that conclusion back in 1972. The fourth quote(Q4) clear. Access and read the explicit *confraud* and consider WHO responsible for such provisions ? And the citizens in the dark care of, the media!(M1)


60mlafr1.jpg (84384 bytes)  the dishonest always rely on the courts and the solicitors ("Merchants Of Misery" ©), who themselves rely on abuse of the Legal Aid facilities, care of their legally trained mates at the Legal Aid Board. Change of name changed nothing The very wolves now operating as the Legal Services Commission cannot parade themselves as lambs. We have the evidence and any responsible / caring Minister should  be contacting us, if he/she does not mind rocking the boat. The public is invited to contact us with their complaints & evidence. 


scamdm01.jpg (48032 bytes)
Using refugees and asylum seekers who arrive in the United Kingdom care of persons who charge for their services, in contempt of  Article 29 of European Union, Law; provisions for the trafficking of humans ignored while public servants steal to meet the cost of the influx to the land of milk and honey, as sold to the world by the media barons, who act as the buffers for the managers of CIUKU Enterprises, the gravy train that has run out of control, apparently with no driver in charge.


 
The Deputy Commissioner of the Metropolitan Police was commissioned to investigate 'the untouchables'. He came up with nothing as far as we are aware. He was then rewarded with a knighthood AND he was appointed as the next   Commissioned to walk the same paths as his predecessor for much of the same. SHOVE IT ALL in the family closet and ignore it. The MEDIA will play their part and we can all carry on fooling the people and selling our state/country, the well organised CIUKU Enterprises, as an allegedly democratic state resting and founded on principles of law and order. Who is to question our arrangements? Our partners in institutionalised crime and organised fraud and corruption from within the media or any other public servant so long as we, collectively keep the citizens in the dark. We even have the shysters who join 'the fraudsters' club playing their parts in perfect harmony with us.


This Page
part 1
part 2
part 3
part 4

SECTION 2
part 1
part 2
part 3

SECTION 3
part 1
part 2
part 3
part 4
part 5

SECTION 4
part 1
part 2
part 3
part 4
part 5
part 6

undercon.gif (286 bytes) Site reconstruction.Page Revised: June 20, 2012.  
VISITORS ARE URGED to access and READ THE IMPORTANT update and ADDENDA we were obliged to introduce in January 2002. You will find it at the top of the Updated Pages File. We are sure that you will share with us our concerns and most profound disappointment at and with persons who adopt and promote activities which they know are nothing but downright crimes. We refer to our exclusive page where we expose (as conscientious law abiding citizens) the Confidentiality Between Fraudsters that exists care of the BEST OPEN SECRET. 

Guidelines for Navigating the extensive material: access instructions.  

As part of the reconstruction process our new pages and pages where changes and additions have been or are so to be improved - amended are endorsed with the link 'Page Changes and the date of the last changes. The link takes visitors to a List of the changes implemented in the page. This includes new material and links from relevant paragraphs to other  / new relevant material in other pages. For further clarification email: webmaster@


"CORRUPT BRITAIN" ?   The headline further down this page(1*) is but an understatement.  One need only consider the basis and the foundations of the issues published and challenged in our web-pages, and the pages of members of the human-rights (Non Governmental Organisation) Community On Line. >Note the Editor's comment in the editorial: "Time for Ministers to tell the truth".  WE SAY: "Time for the media to tell the truth".

For the benefit of our visitors we quote from the French journal 'Minute' of June 19th 1991: "We are grateful to the Washington Post, the New York Times, Time Magazine and other publications whose directors have attended our re-union and have respected their promises of discretion for almost four decades". David Rockerfeller of the Bilderberg Group. Could anyone ome up with any other word but 'conspirators agreeing to keep the public at large in the dark'? Such arrangements by the abductors of Democracy from within alleged Modern Civilised 'democracies'! All have had the abductors and rapists of 'Justice' the Goddess right behind them, together imposing and aiming for world domination through  their corrupted state of governance.

Need we to add anything to the aforesaid? The group knew of the value of secret deals. Many the greedy and self centred ready willing and able to sell their soul   to the devil.

Of such arrangements the self appointed team leading the LIPS crowd into a similar club(2LT*). Of such scenarios the silent and secretive manipulating others and creating conditions to suit their plans. The LIPS crowd raising issue of and about the secret briefings in the courts while indulging in their very own secret 'arrangements'(Link). Of and in such the Honorary Secretary participating with the architects; declaring on the one hand the need to expose the rampant abuse of the courts' processes, by the legal professions, and blaming the media barons for their silence on the issues. And on the other hand indulging in a blanket silence and non exposure/disclosure campaign of his own in concert with others from the crowd LIPS crowd who had joined the fraudsters club and were enticing others to join them. Of such scripts and scenarios the attempts and in telephone calls in the background, such as the one transcribed and published in our pages between the two LIPS, genies (2LT*).    

The BBC, a most respected institution World Wide in its education web pages admitted that the United Kingdom was in fact the worst offender on Human Rights violations before loosing that esteemed position. What use when the country that boasts the fact its own 'legal experts' drafted the European Convention on Human Rights when the Legal System from within its own boundaries is questioned by so many?

  • What use, any law, national or international, when far too many rely on the independence of the judiciary?
  • What use any law when through their presumed independence of the restraints of law, judges appear to have been set free to act outside the law and in contempt of it?
  • What use any Justice system, when judges breach parliament's laws and act in contempt of it, habitually destroying families and targeted citizens by deliberately ignoring the facts and the evidence presented to them?
  • What use when the judiciary systematically ignore the law they are 'the experts at' and the appointed guardians of it?
  • What better examples than "The Downing Street Years" ? (Link*) (copyright law) and "The Stephen Lawrence"* (Link) ongoing saga, when the laws breached are ignored, or are treated as if printed in invisible ink or some unknown language?
  • Protracting any case and court action before the courts (or any other government institution and or authority for that matter) 'just to generate and create (through imposed conditions) income for the circles from within which our judiciary rise to judicial office (as PUBLIC SERVANTS and not for any other purpose and or reason than the Judicial OATH(Link) qualifies) IS THE MODUS OPERANDI from within the confines of the United Kingdom Courts.
  • Furthermore, more often than not, our corrupted public services through long ongoing sagas such as the Stephen Lawrence murder, prove both their approach to public duty and to crime.
  • Reference to *human-rights.org * Community On Line* cases, such as the 'case' where the judge could not tell the difference in law in plain English, between 'IMPOSED agreement' and 'NO UNDUE INFLUENCE' by the solicitors who imposed the agreement suffices. It was a case of the first step in the constructive frauds leading to more of the same, which we cover in the /confraud.htm page/file.
  • WHO, but public servants and 'officers of law', RESPONSIBLE for the encouragement that lead to the headline we publish below?
  • Upon which bodies and persons do the dishonest and the financially more secure rely to perpetrate many a wrong act and or to impose their vile activities on the less fortunate and or 'the lesser protected by the laws that are written and or published in invisible ink, for the corrupt and the corrupted to know not of?

The words below very clear: - "....all too eager to hand out your money AND IGNORE THE LAW".   My goodness the MEDIA have now discovered that law does exist.  When will the police and public servants do?

IGNORE THE LAW .... IGNORE THE LAW.... IGNORE THE LAW....

(Back to National Scandal: complacency  The Facts: the affidavit

And the very paper on 30th July 1998 carried the headline "Yard Targets Lawyers In Bribes Probe"

 LAWYERS? Back to,The Facts: Affidavit Back to: National Scandal

The above headlines take us back to the Valerie Grove interview of Sir Peter Michael Ibden, ex commissioner of the Metropolitan police, in October 1992.

THE AMORAL SOCIETY he spoke of, over nine years ago

  • AND in the Daily Mail, again, on 13 January 1997 the news below covered high profile cases because of the high cost, naturally. The words 'LEGAL AID CHEATS'*.  YET the daily abuse of the Legal Aid system is ignored because the ordinary citizens, who are the victims, have no recourse and the law enforcement agencies protect them not. The operatives of the 'system' milk the state daily (and the targeted victims, of course, as the Geoffrey Harold Scriven cases brought to light).
  • Plenty of documented evidence exists. It establishes beyond reasonable doubt that abuses of the Housing Benefit facilities lead also to abuse of the Legal Aid facilities and funds (as reported in the Daily Mail on 30th June 1997, as we publish above).  We reported to the DSS Fraud investigation department and to the Legal Aid Board (naturally) such matters.
  • WE await to see who acts first and how. Needless to say neither acknowledged our letters. To do so leads to acceptance and not simple recognition of the problem the public IS AWARE OF.
  • Turning a blind eye, and a deaf ear WAS the modus operandi of persons in authority and we look forward to more changes for a better society. In the circumstances when public servants acted, others must follow suite.
  • The adage 'recognition that a problem exists is half way to solving it' stands on sound reasoning AND WE SHALL GO ON promoting it relentlessly. We trust the investigation by the Yard will lead to better and healthier operations within the Legal System.
  • We look forward to better deals for the public as the Rt. Hon. Paul Boateng stated in his letter to our founder.
  • The instructions from the cabinet to the Rt. Hon. Frank Field, Minister, to "DO THE UNTHINKABLE" rested on 'recognition of the UNACCEPTABLE  PRACTICES known to many.  It was, however, considered prudent to admit lack of funds to cope with the demands (not abused?) to provide for the needy.
  • One wonders, in the case of HOUSING NEEDS how local authorities managed if not as the manipulators of the corrupt system arranged and organised at the expense of their targeted victims, in the handling of Housing Benefit funds*, and the attached issues that we cover on our web-site.
  • The article on bribes and lawyers suffices. The citizens are informed of such matters but they are NEVER TOLD if anything has been or is being done about the vile practices, the fraudulent activities.
  • We have evidence in support of the fact that officers of the Courts are aware of such practices and that they DO recognise abuses by the legal profession.
  • We have documents evincing the fact that when a judicial person while acting 'judiciously' CHALLENGED a blatant abuse of the LEGAL AID FUND(LA1) facilities and DID 'reprimand' the solicitors involved at the time.
  • HOWEVER, at that very court solicitors sought and were seeking to convert moneys owing to a citizen (rents due and payable, under a shorthold tenancy agreement) to alleged legal costs, contemptuous of the evidence and in contravention of a contemporaneous Court of Appeal ruling(CoA1).
  • Inexcusable and unjustified abuse of the Legal Aid facilities that are nothing but a loan payable back from moneys recovered. One wonders how on earth solicitors applied for a Legal Aid certificate for the client who owed a substantial amount of rents and was assisted to disappear to an undisclosed destination as soon as the relevant and appropriate DEFAULT SUMMONS WAS SERVED on the debtor tenant, the solicitors client!
  • Questionable activities!
  • County Court officers overlooked(?) the concurrent COURT of APPEAL RULING in respect of the matters the two firms of solicitors engaged in?
  • Both firms of solicitors somehow  securing alleged Legal Aid Certificates (Refer to the G. H Scriven cases(GSA) for an  insight as to the financial position of the solicitors indemnity fund). Violating the rights of the victim, landlady, abusing the*- LAW?
  • Solicitors and court officers contemptuously seeking to play at theatre (in a county court)  irrespective of Higher Authorities? A contemporaneous Court of Appeal ruling ignored by all in pursuit of theatre, at the county court, where ALL were hoping to present their theatrical scenarios and faulty on fact and law scripts, irrespective of 'The LAW'.
  • The Lord Chancellor is presently to receive an appropriate challenge through a respected member of Parliament representing the government that WILL DO the unthinkable as its leader declared and the present
  • d our founder in July 1995.

The LORD CHANCELLOR and his office,
The LEGAL AID BOARD,
The HOME SECRETARY and his office AND

  • THE POLICE AUTHORITIES are hereby called to explain the free for all that the Legal Professions appear to benefit from, as our founder recognised and came to know and has known of for over thirty years now. 
  • IT IS ALL done care of others who know of the LAW (and the provisions and purpose of the Legal Aid facilities, they ABUSE). Unjustified and inexcusable provisions of Legal Aid facilities to those who blatantly breach and violate the LAW.
  • More often than not through encouragement to do so, as the Daily Mail investigation, published on 30th June 1997, uncovered and EXPOSED. ".. AND IGNORE THE LAW...", the investigating reporters concluded. Inexcusable and blatant acts of THEFT of rights to property*; any person so indulging ought to be prosecuted.
  • DECEPTION is one issue BUT CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUD through abuse of trust or office is unjustified in the mother of modern Democracy.
  • THE LAW ON DECEPTION and FRAUD CANNOT BE IGNORED by those in authority.
  • They know of THE PRACTICES and receive thousands of complaints annually yet do nothing. The blatant abuses of the Social Security Funds we reported to one and all, as long ago as May/August 1996. A councillor, at Haringey Council, hastened to admit the SCAMS and the fraud that the 'staff indulged in, in 1999, some 3 years later.
  • Miraculously he acted only after our founder's explicit letter to the Home Secretary in December 1998, published in our pages.

WE were glad to note and we reported, later, that the abuse of the Housing Benefit funds/facilities, by Local Authorities and their staff(?) will be no more. A 'decision' of the innovative and concerned Chancellor of the Exchequer, and the government he represents, was released to the press :

TAX CREDIT TO REPLACE HOUSING BENEFIT cutting at a stroke

OUR CHALLENGE

  • ANY PERSON in authority and or reputable newspaper editor/publisher (whose attention we will draw to our web pages) is called to contact us.
  • We will furnish full particulars to them and the documented evidence in support of our claims.  THE Social Security funds are being fleeced AT WILL by persons who DO KNOW THE LAW.
  • Worse, they are in a position to know that what they do IS OUTSIDE THE LAW. They also know that the Nolan Committee pointed out to the fact that there exists the common law offence of 'misconduct in public office'*.
  • Haringey Council and its officers who acted in contempt of the law and their Mr David Graaf who set himself up as an obstacle to our rights to progress a complaint within their independent of UK & European Union law, grossly violating the rights of their victims SHOULD ACT NOW for we intent to publish full details about the criminal activities and the violations of Human Rights within the Republic of Haringey.
  • The above challenge applies to the Haringey Police, the officers of which conveniently failed and are defaulting to prosecute criminals for crimes the police were given full particulars of and for. Their arrogant failures to attend to matters such as criminal damages to property. We refer to the usual orchestrated constructive frauds that are instigated by their paymasters through their well trained and tutored, in harmonious crimes that are tune with the abusers of public office within the Local Courts: Magistrates and County Court.
  •  
  •  
  •  

 

 

 

 

Link to: h-r Home Page  The Police  The Home Office  Morals and Morality
Link to: Cowboy Lawyers  Fraud Vitiates Judgements  Misconduct in Public Office 
Link to: Corrupt Court/Lawyer practices ADMITTED  Court of Appeal ruling-housing
Link to: Downing Street   Stephen Lawrence   Legal Aid Cheats   Housing Benefit Fraud
Link to: Theft of Rights to Property  Divorce Lawyer Admits Fraud

...

  Back to: HomePage

 

 

The creator of this website was inviting victims to access URrights & join him there with other victims to expose & challenge abusers of trust & public office until the providers of the facilities >ning.com< introduced new terms and conditions for the provision of the facilities. Access from here and read of the imposed states by the brains behind ning.com and consider only one element "WHY OBSTRUCT & HINDER THE DOWNLOAD of the existing material at URrights.ning.com >the intellectual properties of the creator of that presence on the Internet and those who joined him there? Read below of the unacceptable conduct and behaviour by the reckless abusers of trust, who set out to obstruct and blackmail the creator of URrights.ning

Persons who are genuinely concerned and object to the ways they were / are being treated by alleged servants of the publicand the law >in any PSEUDOdemocracy, or whatever states / conditions they are subjected to< by abusers of public facilities and public office >as we cover in our web-pages< should contact webmaster@human-rights.org for information relevant to the creation of similar facilities for INFOrmation on URrights, for facilities for URrights EUrope and for a NETwork of URrights activists.

  • APOLOGIES to friends and persons who could not access URrights following the recent changes by the providers of the facility (ning.com) Andrew Yiannides created and used the portal to create the presence on the Internet for the group of victims / challengers who joined with him to expose and challenge the arrogant and blunt abuse of public services in all allegedly civilised societies > PSEUDODEMOCRACIES <.

  • The changes related to the introduction of charges for the facilities, included the facility for ning.com to archive the material at URrights; also the facility to download the archived material to the creator's system (computer) while the creator and his group of friends considered which of the level of charges and service the group was to adopt.

  • HOWEVER the creator, Andrew Yiannides, WAS UNABLE TO DOWNLOAD THE ARCHIVED MATERIAL and all attempts to engage the providers and their staff in reasonable explanation as to WHY THE FAILURES TO CONNECT / DOWNLOAD from the ning.com servers THE ARCHIVED MATERIAL, were contemptuously ignored.

  • Emails to the Publicity, to the Promotion, to the Public Relations, also to the Chief Executive's Office merited no response whatsoever from anyone acting for ning.com

  • In the circumstances Andrew will appreciate any information related to the problems covered above. Andrew will also appreciate any information relative to exchanges with or email postings, from ning.com to existing members.

  • EXISTING URrights members, victims of the legal system, victims of solicitors and the courts should access the updated pages at .org/solicitors.htm and .org/solfraud.htm by using the links from the list below.

Below pages where we expose known lovers of it all, users and maintenance engineers of the system as is

.org/1999dfax.htm .org/1ofmany.htm .org/2lipstalk.htm .org/4deceit.htm .org/absolute.htm .org/abusers.htm
.org/account4.htm .org/actors.htm .org/actors2.htm .org/adoko.htm .org/bankers.htm .org/beware.htm
.org/blunket1.htm .org/chaldep1.htm .org/confraud.htm .org/contract.htm .org/convicti.htm .org/courts.htm
.org/corruptcourts.htm .org/crimesin.htm .org/dreamers.htm .org/evesused.htm .org/evilones.htm .org/famfraud.htm
.org/govolso.htm .org/guesswhy.htm .org/len.htm .org/mauricek.htm .org/media.htm .org/solfraud.htm
.org/solicitors.htm .org/someplan.htm .org/someploy.htm .org/thefacts.htm .org/theproof.htm .org/thenerve.htm
.org/twisted.htm .org/uaccount.htm .org/ukmm.htm .org/uwatchit.htm .org/watchit1.htm .org/yourtax.htm
  • Every single person we name and expose in the above pages elected to ignore THEIR OBLIGATIONS TO REPORT (to 'the serfs' = 'the taxpayers'), THE ABUSERS OF PUBLIC OFFICE & PUBLIC FACILITIES. All were/are relying on the Intellectual Prostitutes, from within the media, to keep it all in the family closet.
  • All, as typical twin-tongue hypocrites carry on complaining about the media for failing to report & for suppressing the facts and the realities they allegdely reported to the hard of hearing, to the otherwise committed angels blowing their silent trumpets for decades, all ready and gearing to welcome the expansion of the New World Order.
  • Of such parts the contributions from and failings of the persons we name and expose, AS IF THEIR OWN SILENCE, THEIR FAILURES  & THEIR BLUNT OBSTRUCTIONS to the work and other actions by the creator of this website, Andrew Yiannides, treated by one and all as if non-existent with the exception when the wily Norman Scarth, set off to abuse the trust he was allowed to benefit from, while his parts and questionable activities / performance were under scrutiny, specifically after HE FAILED to publish the full transcript of the Court of Appeal hearing HE WAS ALLOWED TO RECORD* [*Link from here to the food for thought page created by Andrew Yiannides, in the first instance].
  • Not one ever bothered to address the issues we expose in the explicit page, despite the fact that we have been pointing all of our contacts, since May 1992, to it all.
  • Visitors, readers and researchers are urged / invited to access and read the letter which the Hon. Secretary of the Litigants In Person Society, Mr. Norman Scarth sent to the founder of human-rights, Mr. Andrew Yiannides, reproduced in the page .org/4deceit.htm* [*L]
  • The author's statements, such as 'what for and why seek additional assistance', thereby spelling out his parts as a lover of it all.
  • Common sense dictates, that he should have directed his request to his partners in deceptions aplenty, one & all engaging in fraudulent misrepresentations AND NOTED TO HAVE, WILFULLY, BEEN SUPPRESSING, FROM THE TAXPAYERS, THE FACTS OF LIFE RELATIVE TO THE RAMPANT ABUSE OF THE COURTS FACILITIES as the failure of all to co-operate as covered and pointed to at:- [*L]. One and all fallen to the facilities for fraud aplenty on the taxpayers and the corruption of illiterates in law, the conditioned victims of the legal circles & courts who fall to the blackmail element attached to the REWARD for keeping the realities away from the taxpayers; just like the media and the Ministers responsible for the application of long existing law to the criminal activities we cover in our pages, do.
  • All the while one and all were / are engaging in the scenarios we cover in the exclusive page, which page the author of the letter which Mr Norman Scarth sent to Andrew Yiannides, afforded us the opportunity to address the issue of the contributions of his partners and affiliates in fraud aplenty on the taxpayers; despite the reminder one and all, named in the new page simply shoved it all in the dark corners of their devoid of grey matter skulls, their perverted / corrupted mind(s)

> MOST IMPORTANT <
On Sunday morning, the 19th September 2010, the Deputy Prime Minister, leader of the Liberal-Democrats in the course of the BBC TV politics programme, spoke of the coalition government's commitment to address the element of waste and fraud through the public services sector. We trust and hope that the elements we expose in our pages and the parts adopted by the conditioned victims of the legal circles, the persons who engage in PROMOTING & EXPANDING THE ONGOING CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUD ON THE TAXPAYERS, THROUGH ABUSE OF THE COURTS' FACILITIES, will be on the top of the list of government priorities.
Visitors, readers & researchers are urged to access the letters to Minister Frank Field [*L] after he had been directed by the Prime Minister to think/do the unthinkable.
Link also from here [*L] to the explicit letter to the Home Secretary in December 1998 with submissions arising out of the RAMPANT HOUSING BENEFIT FRAUD
On Tuesday 23rd November 2010, 'the Guardian' in its Comment & Debate page carried an article by Nick Clegg, the Deputy Prime Minister. In the evening of the same day the Deputy Prime Minister addressed a large audience at Kings place in respect of the government's changes on university students fees / loans.
Access from here the page where we reproduce an image of 'the Guardian' article & consider the simple fact that we, alone, have been asserting and proclaiming our objections to the theft of funds from the national budget leading to the ever-increasing annual deficit in the state's balance of payments.

ACCESS:  http://www.justice-uk.human-rights.org/ (For an important message at this Community-on-Line web-site) & thereafter,
Access also http://www.law.society.complaints.and.human-rights.org/ (Judge instigates Fraud On Tax Payers - he knows not the difference between 'imposed' & 'no undue influence'). APOLOGIES FOR THE DISAPPEARANCE OF THIS WEBSITE.It appears that the beneficiary of the work, both for applications to the courts in the United Kingdom and the submissions to the European Court for Human Rights* [*Link from here to the Statement of Facts submitted to the ECoHR], arranged with the providers of the free web space to erase the Intellectual Property of Andrew Yiannides, the founder of the human-rights Community-on-Line, without any reference to the creator of the website and owner of the Intellectual Property!
鼯font> Copyright subsists on all material in our web-site, owned by the authors of same.
Visitors can refer to these pages in any non commercial activity, so long as attribution is given as to source. License to use, for commercial or other specific use of the material, shall have been secured in writing first, from the owners of any property and material from these pages. No material shall be reproduced in any form and by any means without prior agreement and or license in writing from the copyright owners. The Press are invited to contact us if they wish to publish material in the Public Interest, As We Do.
For any problems or questions regarding this web-site contact:  webmaster
...