h-rtitle.gif (7604 bytes)

Crime - Organised - Institutionalised - Corruption - Fraud - Protection Rackets, run and managed by judicial chair occupants, in a free-for-all state of abundance. Note below the arrangements between the administrative, the judiciary and the media; read of the all-embracing guarantee in place, in contempt of all law : the root shall be pointed to.

WHERE IS JUSTICE? Read below:-

"The court has inherent jurisdiction to stay an action which must fail; as, for instance an action brought in respect of an act of State"

*Link from here to founder's tribulations in 1972-75 and marvel at the creativity of allegedly honourable officers of Justice and the Law in the mother of all PSEUDOdemocracies

  • And by extension any act of any public servant who is appointed, retained and maintained by other public servants for all of whom, the state, as employer, is ultimately responsible, including abusers of judicial chair occupancy. Hence, the billions paid out as covered in the affidavit which visitors can link to directly from here [*Link].
  • Link also from here to the founder's conclusions as of 1972-75 when the great Metropolitan police were seen to be nothing but accessories to and abettors of the rampant fraud and corruption through the courts organised and processed to fruition while Members of Parliament were -as they still do- promoting the waffle that amounts to nothing short of:-

'independence of the judiciary to act in contempt of ALL LAW (national and international) in a pseudo-democracy.

*Link from here to proof of the parts the police play in promotion and expansion of the criminal activities instigated, processed and imposed on society by the legal circles. Read of assertions by a typical hypocrite, none other than the Commissioner of the Metropolitan Police, Sir Robert Mark QPM, when he spoke of FALSE RECORDS / FORGERIES by the legal circles while delivering his famous Dimbleby Lecture on BBC-TV in November 1973, 15 months after he received true copy of THE FORGERY advanced and promoted by the licensed criminals : solicitors and barristers for their evil ends in the case that opened Andrew Yiannides' mental eyes to the realities of life in the United Kingdom, a typical PSEUDOdemocracy. Can anyone enlighten Andrew and the millions of victims of the legal circles WHY NO PROSECUTION of the solicitors & the barristers in 1972 or thereafter?.

  • With such a facility in place (the words we point to above) and arrogant abuse of public office, can anyone assert, or argue, that Mr Andrew Yiannides, the founder of human-rights, was not right to determine that Justice has been abducted and that she is held captive in the dungeons maintained by her abductors who rape her daily in their courts? (>Hence the c reation of www.jusaticeraped.org <)
  • ALL Member States of the European Union are subject to the ruling which visitors, readers and researchers can access in the explicit page /yourrights.htm

*Link from here to the realities - in due course also a link to the warning (indirect but nonetheless very clear) for thinkers to recognise 

  • On 3rd March 2008 >someone's birthday< we released a House of Lords PRECEDENT CASE and reveal deliberations by their Lordships in respect of FRAUD - DECEPTION - CONSPIRACY & IMPLIED LIES BY KEEPING SILENT about any wrong imposed on any other.
  • >>> IN THE MEANTIME we have been naming and shaming a number who know of and engage in much more than just approve wrongs imposed on Mr & Mrs Average, the millions of taxpayers, in our allegedly civilised country / state / province / district of the European Union created by politicians, without reference to the taxed for fraud sucker-serfs, allegedly for the benefit of the citizens from FRAUD & CORRUPTION, among other promotions.

Needless to say the case entailed activities and practices by solicitors as Mr Andrew Yiannides was subjected to, decades later, by an old school friend, Mr Kypros Nichola of Nicholas & Co. in London. Mr K. Nichola bluntly abused the trust placed in him and indulged, in tandem with others, in criminal activities intended to cause the damages that were imposed on the targeted 'serf' by accredited - by the Law Society & Bar Council - allegedly Honourable Officers of the Supreme Court, the courts maintained by successive elected governments in the United Kingdom, one of many pseudodemocracies. In due course another revelation relevant to the arrogant 'inherent jurisdiction', through which to deny, obstruct justice & impose all manner of criminally created states on 'the serfs', who are taxed for the cost of maintaining criminals in public office, in pseudo-democracies.

RESPONSIBLE FOR THE STATE OF AFFAIRS, successive irresponsible Lord Chancellors and Home Secretaries who ignored and ignore all complaints and submissions by victims of the organised crimes we point to and expose in our pages, irrespective of the evidence and the law pointed to, by the victims of it all, the citizens who are called upon to pay taxes for the maintenance of criminals in public office.

[*Link from here to our exclusive page, covering confidential fraud as arranged THROUGH THE BEST KEPT OPEN SECRET in alleged democracies, European States. Elsewhere the foundations and corner stone upon which the operatives built the societies of their making using the bricks and mortar we cover in this and other pages. The visitor should not be under any illusion that the stars in the theatrical productions, covered in our pages were by any stretch of the imagination 'humans' who were / are gifted with any attributes that distinguish 'true humans' (>thinkers<) from animals.

Fraud in court  Council staff use Forgeries   Misconduct in Public Office. 2 cases relative to applicable law One Protocol says it ALL It betrays arrogant intentions Law Provides for THEFTS and it covers Judges too Judges' duties   TIME 4 CHANGE   & CHALLENGES Site CONTENTS - Table of Contents & ongoing work Your Rights & OBLIGATIONS to Society SITE SEARCH facility for any specific element / issue of concern to visitors / readers
COURTS : their Facilities Abused For ORGANISED CRIME : FRAUD Solicitor's Perjury & Victim Ignores it all Just like the Law Society always does Blackmailed or is it Just Conditioned & Subjugated Victims who join the club ? We name Lovers of blunt fraud through courts - Users of the facilities 4 illicit gains Local Authorities & FRAUD on 'serfs' the Taxpayers who are kept in the dark Police Party to & Endorsing Criminal Acts, Activities Arrogant Fraud FALSE Records & Contempt of Law by the legal Circles & Public Services The crafty ones & Vexatious Litigant PLOYS for the rewarded silent

* Information FOR victims who wish to co-operate by EXPOSING & CHALLENGING abusers of Public Office *

family.uk-human-rights justiceraped.org dssfraud.htm confraud.htm dadscare.htm contract.htm converts.htm MensAid
solicitorsfromhell.co.uk chancellor.htm theyknow.htm solfraud.htm sheknows.htm 4deceit.htm convicti.htm forward.htm


*Link from here to evidence. *Link also from here to a case when the abusers of the courts' facilities abandoned their plans for another targeted family

IMPORTANT INFORMATION for all victims of malpractice - misconduct - negligence, etc. TO NOTE

In the civil justice system in England and Wales, a judge presides over the proceedings that are argued by the opposing sides through the adversarial process. The process enables the court, judge, to reach a conclusion as to the truth of the facts in dispute. Thereat it is for the judge to apply the law to the facts proven, established at court.

The system as evolved is covered in the page 'English Legal System' and remains the same after the Woolf reforms.

An explicit Affidavit [*L] plus exhibits and
     letters to a Chief Inspector of Police
          one to solicitors
[*L] and another to the Lord Chancellor [*L] evince
               ORGANISED CRIMES
(Access and read the letter to the police in September 2006 [*L])

Access & read from one of a number of letters to the Prime Minister : * I believe that New Labour will deliver us from the wrongs we have been suffering for far too long. Use of our resources in terms of human potential and capabilities can and should be channelled through rights not wrongs, through positives not through negatives. It is our produce and ingenuity we can sell to others not the minefields of corrupt and bankrupt public services. * [*Link from here to the page, note the steps taken to ensure the Prime Minister forwarded / delegated submissions and evidence received at 10 Downing Street to the right Minister / Ministry because the submissions were in respect of ORGANISED CRIMES

3rd March 2011 added link [*L] to the BBC-TV Dimbleby Lecture in 1973 as the Metropolitan Police Commissioner, Sir Robert Mark prepared & presented to the sucker-serfs


arrogant.htm     Page KEY 

PageChanges 12 Mar. 2007

import.gif (1348 bytes)

HELP US TO HELP YOU Please (*Link to plea).

hrbnrsml.gif (1165 bytes)

JOIN others On Line and publish your Statement of Facts and the Evidence you have. (Member's case at the European Court on Human Rights - paves the way TO PLEAD VIOLATIONS caused through abusive use of the courts in allegedly civilised Democratic States. Victims do not know that IT IS ALL ORGANISED BY the very circles who have been arranging all of humanity's TRIBULATIONS  FOR THOUSANDS of years) Use your rights in law (*Link) and ACT, with others, against the offenders. Join with others and chip in for the creation of the mass of evidence against abusers of public office : the abductors and rapists of Justice. You can then benefit from THE FACTS & THE EVIDENCE that you will help establish. It can all be used in any action, severally or jointly with others, as the case may be. Crimes against humanity are not ruled out when a large number of citizens can come up with evidence and as victims concur and or expand upon on the FACTS STATED & The VIOLATIONS PLEADED as LODGED at the ECoHR, already

The image of the order below EVINCES THE FACT  that as soon as a victim used his rights to PUBLISH & EXPOSE the offending Public Servants who abused the facilities of the courts for Constructive Frauds and CONVERSION OF ASSETS & PROPERTIES TO THE LEGAL CIRCLES, they acted.
wsfltarr.jpg (65011 bytes)
Visitors / researchers NOTE: The victim after setting up a home page, as a member of the Community on Line simply sent out a press release about his *crookjudges* Web Site. Without any application, by the victim (so he informed Mr Yiannides) A MIRACLE : he received  the above Court Order. It was rushed out to him, granting him permission for LEAVE TO APPEAL. DO NOTE, please, the date at the right hand corner, bottom of the document. LOOK also at the date when date stamped. It is obvious that the hand written order WAS RUSHED OUT first thing in the morning before changing the date in the rubber stamp. A Miracle 20th century style, we are sure all will agree, and there exist plenty of charlatans & stooges who are running around 'selling and promoting the practices as maintenance engineers who INFLUENCE SHYSTERS and or INVITE lovers of fraud to indulge with them in the very same practices we cover in the exclusive page that NONE OF THE ALLEGED VICTIMS who contacted us over the last 18 years addressed, for obvious reasons to us. (*Link to the exclusive page where we expose the blunt & arrogant CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUDS THROUGH ABUSE OF THE COURTS FACILITIES) 

VISITOR please READ this
BRIEF introduction to page
WHY Leave to Appeal was... The BUBBLE IS BURSTING
In Contempt of EVIDENCE 
Contempt to EVIDENCE 
In Contempt of ARTICLE 6
Contempt to LAW 
Public Servants to ACCOUNT  TRUE Democracy - definition
Obstruct / HINDER Appeals Processes Posted LATE
Cases/Sites by Element
Contempt to Evidence
Haringey Police - H/B Fraud
V. B. Foden - Mortgage
V. B. Foden - Divorce
V. B. Foden-Solicitor Case
Contempt to Law
Enfield Council - C.Court
Hackney Council - C.Court
Haringey Council - C.Court
Haringey Police - H/B Fraud
Len Miskulin - Divorce
V. B. Foden - Mortgage
False Instruments - List
Len Miskulin - Divorce
P. Constantinou - Divorce
Forgery Used
V. B. Foden - Financial
Haringey Council-H/B Fraud
V.B. Foden-Solicitor Case
Obstruct - Examination
P. Constantinou - Divorce
Obstructing Justice
Crown Prosecution Service
Court of Appeal - R.B.Del C
part 3     
Strike Out
Helen Patey - Assertions
Divorce Frauds Challenged
V. B. Foden - Plymouth
part 4     


Andrew apologises to friends who joined him for the common cause at urrights.ning.com as concerned victims, for the developments after www.ning.com introduced NEW terms for the provision of the facility. Andrew was informed that the existing material on line could be dowloaded BUT the facility WAS OBSTRUCTED by the very people ning.com


Facebookers can connect with the creator of this website IF victims of the abused court & police facilities from within any pseudodemocracy Access the creator at .com/yiandrew
IF proactive OR wishing to expose & challenge the offenders







ARROGANT LIES & PERJURY * Page created & released in October 2007 *
ALL ENDORSED & PROMOTED ' BY SOLICITORS WHO ENGAGED WITH ANOTHER SOLICITOR IN ATTEMPTS TO CONVERT FUNDS OWING FOR OCCUPATION OF A PROPERTY TO ALLEGEDLY LEGITIMATE LEGAL COSTS WITH THE COURT MANAGER & POSSIBLY OFFICERS OF THE COURT TOO  (as intended by them all) HAD THEY NOT BEEN CHALLENGED APPROPRIATELY. For the facts & realities access the explicit affidavit lodged at court as delivered to the solicitors on the day when they attended court intending to engage in theatrics which they had to abandon.[*Link from here to facts stated on affidavit by one of the targeted victims and get to know of the parts played by alleged servants of the public, such as persons who operate from within Local Authorities and the police. *Link also from here to an extract from the work of the late Stephen Knight, *The Brotherhood* and note what was revealed to him by insiders in connection with organised wrongdoing / criminal activities in contempt / breach of Parliaments Law. *Link also from here to a House of Lords ruling and deliberations arising out of solicitors activities, reckless defaults / failings such as the type of activities that were deployed in the instance at hand - covered in the affidavit & do not overlook the fact that their Lordships were addressing the elements of (a) 'conspiracy', (b) 'dishonesty' and (c) 'fraud' - WAKE UP 'SERFS']

undercon.gif (286 bytes) *Page Revised: August 04, 2012* Introduced more links to and from other pages
Site under reconstruction - ongoing additional material and changes to pages
Guidelines on Navigating through the extensive material: access instructions. In the alternative IF looking for any specific issue/issues USE the search facility.

As part of the reconstruction process our new pages and pages where changes and additions have been implemented, the improved / amended pages are endorsed with the link 'Page Changes and the date of the last changes. The link takes visitors to a List of the changes implemented in the page. These include new material and links from relevant paragraphs to other or new relevant material in other pages. For further clarification email: webmaster@

VISITORS ARE URGED to access and READ THE IMPORTANT update and ADDENDA we were obliged to introduce in January 2002. We had no choice but to REPORT THE CRIMES TO THE TREASURY* [*Link from here to the page]. Our observations and knowledge of the constructive frauds made us accessories if we kept quiet, like the alleged victims who work towards the implementation of the schemes by the abductors and rapists of Justice, the Goddess. You will find the addenda statement at the top of the Updated Pages File. We are sure that you will share with us our concerns and most profound disappointment at and with persons who adopt and promote activities which they know to be nothing but downright crimes* (*F3  most important evidence). We refer to our exclusive page where we expose (as conscientious law abiding citizens) the Confidentiality Between Fraudsters that exists care of the BEST OPEN SECRET. 

  • We publish, elsewhere, in our pages, an explicit affidavit covering the criminal activities that were instigated by and organised through Public Servants, and the Courts' Service. All with judicial chair occupants in control throughout, thereafter. [*Link to the images of the extensive affidavit where EVERYTHING WAS PLEADED, for obvious reasons, Simply and BECAUSE IT HAD TO BE PLACED ON RECORD. *Link also from here to an explicit appeal wherein the issue of making sure no fact or evidence was suppressed was stressed to an abuser of judicial chair occupation as pleaded in the appeal]
  • We publish below images of an affidavit that was settled by the solicitors (we rightly assume because no barrister was ever engaged, briefed or appeared in the intended proceedings) for and on behalf of the Plaintiff, the deponent of the allegedly justified BUT FRAUDULENT IN INTENT (as organised and intended by the legal circles and the abusive of public positions fraudsters) ATTEMPTED IMPOSITIONS THROUGH ABUSE OF THE COURTS FACILITIES.
  • The affidavit was served by the solicitors who created it by simply endorsing falsehoods and lies, in the usual manner. Apparently / arrogantly (the reader should decide the solicitor's frame of mind, after reading of it all). The solicitors, apparently, oblivious to the existence of an explicit Court of Appeal ruling that was confirmed by the House of Lords in 1939 & 1940* respectively. [*Link from here to the precedent case that established the legal position in such activities,.... TO THE DETRIMENT OF 'THE SERFS', targeted. The judgement / precedent case  WAS IGNORED by successive governments FOR well over FOUR DECADES].
  • Needless to say the legal circles, for over 56 years (by then), just carried on engaging in their old established ways...... milking the sucker-serfs who seek the services of organised fraudsters. All from within the legal system and services simply carried and carry on abusing the trust of 'the serfs' and the courts' facilities (with the blessings of the managers and controllers of the courts' facilities, the police and Ministers).
  • One and all observed and seen to be serving their personal ulterior motives and the services seen to have been in full force when the process server, served the affidavit (with other documents) on the targeted victims of the bluntly Organised Constructive Frauds. All organised by fraudsters who operate and manage the invisible and contemptuous of the law services on offer to criminals, through abuse of the courts' facilities.
  • We hasten to add that the aforesaid frauds were instigated, organised and set in motion through the Social Services and the Housing Benefits Section maintained at and by Haringey Council in North London (*F2). We add also that the proceedings, resting and founded on allegedly legitimate claims, were settled by the very solicitors who settled the ill-conceived and unfounded claims which they lodged at court in order to secure issue of the proceedings. Thereafter they arranged for the service of the inexcusable and unjustified allegations which they set about to promote as justified in order to secure 'rewards for their part in the usual FRAUD THROUGH THE LEGAL SYSTEM FACILITIES ON OFFER TO CRIMINALS'.
  • The above realities ongoing in an allegedly civilised Democracy, one that is promoted as a civilised state & one that allegedly rests and is founded on principles of law and order.
  • The ill-conceived proceedings were instigated by solicitors, who were acting for and on behalf of the deponent of the affidavit (images below). The solicitors 'conveniently' acted WITHOUT contacting (in the first instance) the proposed / intended Defendants, the targeted victims of the constructive frauds that WERE TO BE IMPOSED on the targeted 'serfs'.
  • We refer, above, to blunt frauds intended by many, and set in motion with active participation (in the scams) by staff and officers of the London Borough of Haringey, with the blessings of the local police. (*F1)
  • On the night when the process server, (used by the solicitors) served a Court Order that 'introduced the targeted victims to the plans of the organisers of THE INTENDED FRAUD THROUGH THE COURTS FACILITIES & THE LEGAL SYSTEM, the process server GAVE AWAY THE ISSUE OF INVISIBLE SERVICES THROUGH ABUSE OF THE COURTS' FACILITIES..... the justice system as operated by the criminals who are in control of it in the United Kingdom. The process server (retained by the solicitors) asked for directions to Eastern Avenue; he thus indicated that he was to make his way to where Mr Sotirios Neophytou Englezakis was residing, to the matrimonial home the bereaved mother (of the suicide daughter) had maintained for over 36 years.
  • The benefits secured by the solicitors who engaged in the usual invisible services to fraudsters, were noted when the papers served on the targeted victims of organised constructive frauds, as intended, by those who were seeking illegal benefits, UPON READING an Order issued by the court. The said Order, the result of an ex-parte application to Edmonton County Court by the solicitors, Antons & Co. The court evidently pointed out to the solicitors the issue of the ill-conceived proceedings and the obvious abuse of an application & use of the Legal Aid facilities, and in particular the solicitors failures to seek any Court Order in respect of matters that were NOT PREVIOUSLY REFERRED TO THE INTENDED DEFENDANTS..... the targeted victims of the abusers of the legal system and their affiliates in Organised Crime - [*Link 1, from here to the Prime Minster's words on the issue of ORGANISED CRIME, when he returned to the UK in June 2005, coincidentally(!), after an attempt to secure a signature on a contract that was submitted to Mr Andrew Yiannides (*Link 2),  by one of the many peddlers of fraudulent misrepresentations while operating as just another maintenance engineer of 'the system of operations in a pseudo-democracy..... one that allegedly rests and is founded on principles of law and order..... and promoted as such by the media barons and the Intellectual Prostitutes they maintain for the promotion of lies and false state..... part of planned-for FRAUD ON THE SERFS of planet earth]

We cover above an introduction to the background of the activities that required and benefited from invisible services by criminals who operate as Honourable, allegedly, officers of the Supreme Court (solicitors); also from alleged Servants of the Public, persons who operate from within the confines of a Local Authority (Staff & Officers of Haringey Council, North London). Also Police Officers and judicial chair occupants. Additional material and evidence will be released in this page, establishing it all for any doubting Thomas' out there. What and how the abusive of trust and contemptuous of their retainers and public duties elect to do, in the face of the evidence against them we look forward to. Visitors, readers and researchers should not overlook the fact that the police did not just fail the targeted victims, they even engaged in inexcusable threats and intimidation and they even engaged in promoting falsehoods to another set of defaulting Public(!) Servants(?) in order to add to the damages one and all set about imposing on the targeted. 

Below images of the affidavit settled and filed at court by Antons & Co. the solicitors who indulged in abuse of the courts' facilities, as licensed by the Law Society and judicial chair occupants. All in contempt of the rules of procedure and in contempt of an explicit PRECEDENT CASE covering the use and promotion of false instruments in the course of court proceedings. [*Link from here to the page where we publish relevant deliberations by their Lordships in the precedent House of Lords, case on record as of 1939-1940 and note the elements covered by their Lordships].

afo96p1r.jpg (45524 bytes) afo96p2r.jpg (91319 bytes) afo96p3r.jpg (76412 bytes) afo96p4r.jpg (71507 bytes) afo96pbr.jpg (34562 bytes) IMPORTANT NOTE:- VISITORS / READERS should not overlook the fact that the solicitor who accepted instructions to act as he did, DID INCLUDE THE VICTIM OF THE SERIOUS ASSAULT ON Mr Andrew Yiannides, while the POLICE SET ABOUT INTIMIDATING the VICTIM and his sister, with prison sentences for five years.

Below the text of the above images for links to and from

Affidavit filed on behalf of Plaintiff
Deponent : N WIJEMUNI
Affidavit No : 2
Date sworn : 1/10/96
     Date filed :               







I, NIHAL WIJEMUNI previously of 68 Rathcoole Gardens, London N8 9NB MAKE OATH and say as follows:

1.     I am the Plaintiff in these proceedings and I make this my Affidavit in support of my Particulars of Claim in this action, except where the context shows otherwise, I make this Affidavit from the facts and matters within my own personal knowledge.

2.     The First Defendant was my landlady. The Second Defendant is her brother.

3.     On 20 May 1996, I and my wife CHRISTINA WIJEMUNI entered into an assured Shorthold tenancy agreement with the Defendant for premises at 68 Rathcoole Gardens, London N8. The rental duration was for six months. The rent is £480.00 per four weekly period. There is now produced and shown to me marked "NW1" a true copy of the Tenancy Agreement dated 20 May 1996.

4.     The accommodation comprises a first floor flat, one bedroom and personal property namely a large TV - 29", Hi-Fi system, video, clothing, baby toys, and all other personal belongings.

5.     On Saturday 3rd August 1996, I left my rented flat at around mid-day for our household shopping with my wife and 18 month old daughter.

6.     On returning from our trip, I saw our landlady, the Defendant walking out hurriedly from our flat. I called her name, she turned towards me, then continued walking. As I was about to enter the building my brother-in-law NUNO GONCLAVES came running out downstairs and told me that the Defendant and her brother had taken away my television, video, hi-fi and all the other personal property packed them in their car. I ran to the Defendant and asked her what is going on. She told me I was trying to run away without paying rent. She also said she knows the law and was following the law.

7.     The Defendant said she would call the police. I walked towards the phone box where the Defendant was having a conversation. I asked her to allow me to speak to the police. I told the police what had happened and was advised that they would send someone as soon as possible.

8.     I returned to the front of our flat, waited with my wife and baby until the police arrived. Then I heard the Defendant's brother ANDREW telling the Defendant something in their language. I became suspicious and came closer to their car. As soon as the Defendant walked away ANDREW started the engine of the car and tried to move off with my personal property in the car. I told him to turn off the engine and wait until the police arrived but he ignored me whilst continuing to accelerate. I kept telling him to stop but he would not. My bother-in-law and a family friend RICHARD KORCENESKI came to my assistance but were unable to stop the vehicle. As he sped off I pushed my wife and baby to the pavement.

9.     The First and Second Defendant are in breach of the implied covenant in the said Tenancy Agreement that the Plaintiff would be allowed quiet enjoyment of his tenancy.

10.    The Defendants trespassed upon my rented premises and removed a substantial amount of my possessions to an unknown place. There is now shown and produced to me marked "NW2" a Schedule of my goods and their value listed therein.

11.    My family and I have suffered loss, damage, distress, anxiety and inconvenience.

12.    When the Second Defendant drove off with my possessions with the knowledge of the First Defendant the police who had been called arrived. Both Police Officers, on hearing what had happened, explained to the First Defendant that her brother and herself committed a criminal offence. One of the Officers, P.C. Holder gave the First Defendant until 22.00 hours that night to return my goods or face arrest for stealing. I told P.C. Holder about the threatening behaviour of the Second Defendant. I expressed fear of continued violence towards my family and myself.

13.     My family and I remained in the flat until 22.30 hours that night hoping that the Defendants would return my goods but they did not.

14.     We left the flat and had to take refuge with a friend. We did not feel safe to spend the night in the flat.

15.     The Defendants changed the locks to the flat on the 4th August. The keys which we had no longer fitted the locks to the flat. My family and I suffered distress and inconvenience without being able to have quiet enjoyment of our rented flat. All our attempts to contact the Defendants were unsuccessful.

16.     My family and I had been unlawfully evicted by the Defendants. The County Court Summons against me for rent arrears to the amount of £4,180 was issued on 26th July 1996. I had up to 21 days within which to reply to this Summons. The London Borough of Haringey was in the meanwhile processing my claim for housing benefit. The Defendants evicted my family and myself within 5 days of the issue of the Summons. I was still within my legal time limit within which to reply by way of Defence and Counterclaim. The London Borough of Haringey paid the arrears directly to the First Defendant to the sum of £6,826.43p. Not only was the First Defendant paid the arrears but she was overpaid by £2,646.43, and in addition, she received a deposit of £960,00 on 17th November 1994.

17.     There is now shown and produced to me marked "NW3" true copies of the Edmonton County Court Summons filed by the First Defendant, my Defence and Counterclaim to that action; a copy of the Payment History by the London Borough of Haringey showing the date stamp of the 30th of September 1996; and a receipt dated 20th November 1994 in respect of the deposit paid.

18.     I therefore humbly invite this Honourable Court to hear this action and to grant such Orders as it deems fit and appropriate.


BEFORE ME                                                   OFFICER OF A COURT, APPOINTED BY THE JUDGE TO TAKE AFFIDAVITS  

  • Below the five images of an application to court for Summary Judgement after the used & encouraged tenants indulged in a moonlight flight three days after the Default Summons was served on them.
  • Participating / assisting the fraudsters simply staff and officers of Haringey Council, who recklessly abused public office and assisted the fraudsters by providing to them Council accommodation in contempt of the provisions that 'persons who make themselves homeless' cannot / ought not to benefit from Local Authority Housing facilities.
  • WORSE WAS THE ELEMENT that in 'assisting the used & encouraged fraudsters', the Local Authority staff and officers were acting in contempt of the provisions of 'The THEFT ACTS'..... by aiding and abetting the fraudsters to evade existing liabilities in contempt of the law (Theft Acts).
  • In effect the staff and officers of Haringey Council were instrumental and 'proactive creators' of 'constructive frauds' through promotion of lies and by creating / promoting computer printouts which they misrepresented to the targeted victims of all and to the court itself.
  • The assertions of Haringey Council staff and officers, that they had not received duly completed applications with the essential information in respect of the allegedly unemployed tenant Nihal Wijemuni was but another conscious false scenario and state, just as the promotions that the solicitors of the tenant Nihal Wijemuni, allegedly had been negotiating, for months, a redundancy award, for and in respect of an 'unsubstantiated redundancy and unemployment state'.
weccap1r.jpg (126569 bytes) weccap2r.jpg (161892 bytes) weccap3r.jpg (169118 bytes) weccap4r.jpg (169526 bytes) weccap5r.jpg (132753 bytes)


The right to reply and justify the behaviour, the activities and the most intriguing of the defaults and blunt omissions we cover and point to in our pages, is assured to any one we name. We will publish excuses & whatever is submitted to us. Legal argument that shall arise out of their submissions will be used as we apply ourselves to relevant issues in the cases they referred to us & we will cover their acts and all their defaults. (*example) .

This page is dedicated to all abusers of our time; in particular to all members of the Litigants In Person Society, the LIPS crowed/mobsters; also to their affiliates / associates who operate out of similarly organised false fronts and beehives for the type of organised fraud covered / exposed in our exclusive page. All were noted to be actively engaging in promotion of subliminal indoctrination scripts and scenarios while busying themselves in use of new victims of the legal circles and the abused courts' facilities FOR MORE OF THE SAME; just for the REWARDS UNDER THE TABLE arrangements for / to persons who are encouraged to keep quiet in order to benefit from THEFT OF TAX PAYERS CONTRIBUTIONS as covered in our pages* [*Link]. The affidavit we point to from this page and the documents below, with our compliments to Mr Johan Michael Richard Foenander who was introduced to us by the managers and controllers of the LIPS crowd/mob, a 'victim'(!) whose solicitors reacted to an offer from another solicitor as covered in our pages. Johan Michael Richard Foenander, himself engaged in abuse of the courts facilities, with a known (to us) operative of the system as is : simply use of the courts facilities for an INEXCUSABLE application to court in order to generate another costs order against himself with the attached distribution of the rewards facility under Article 38 of the European Court of Huamn Ruights provisions [*Link]. Intended beneficiaries of the court's costs order, none other but the solicitors who wronged him (JMRF) and engaged in fraudulent court proceedings in the course of his (JMRF) divorce proceedings. This page, therefore, is also dedicated to all allegedly concerned victims of the divorce industry and to the legal circles who abuse the courts facilities, as criminals who are licensed by the Law Society & the State, freely indulging in the most blunt and blatant of ORGANISED CRIMES through abuse of the courts facilities. Not one of the 'beneficiaries' of this dedication ever addressed the issue of the arrogantly TARGETED TAXPAYERS' CONTRIBUTIONS for rewards to fraudsters who shoved and shove their heads in the sand as typical ostriches and as persons who know that by accepting stolen funds they are as guilty of the offences as the organisers of the crimes and the money laundering activities* instigated and promulgated through abuse of the courts processes and facilities, as covered in the explicit letter which Mr J.M.R. Foenander wrote / addressed to Mr Geoffrey Harold Scriven*, Chairman of the Litigants In Person Society (LIPS). [*Readers & researchers should *link to the explicit letter from here].

  • It would appear that
  • the media barons and their lapdog & stooges
  • know not the true meaning of either Democracy or Justice.
  • Through defaults and omissions to publish and
  • deal with the facts,
  • the realities and
  • the truth
  • THEY help(ed) develop that which they expect of us to deliver to our children.

We request of our visitors, especially victims of the bluntly organised assaults on the assets of 'the serfs', through abuse of the courts facilities; also taxpayers who have been pointed to our exclusive page to access also the page where we released on 3rd March 2008 the House of Lords Precedent Case dating back to 1939-1940. We specifically draw attention to the foundations and the reasons WHY THE APPEALS all the way to the House of Lords & NOTE : Solicitors wrongdoing in contempt of the solicitors duty to the court and to Justice. [*Link from here to the exclusive page where we cover the Organised Constructive FRAUD ON THE TAXPAYERS through abuse of the courts facilities. *Link also from here to the House of Lords ruling and their Lordships deliberations dating back to 1939-1940]

FOOTNOTE common to most web-pages at this website
MOST IMPORTANT:- In October 2010, the coalition Government's Attorney General, in an interview published by 'COUNSEL' the mothly legal banter magazine, specifically spoke of the police distancing themselves from cases of (small-fry) fraud and he asserted that he was making that element his department's priority*

*Link from here to the evidence.

IT REMAINS TO BE SEEN, WHAT the coalition of the Con-LibDems, THE GOVERNMENT OF THE DAY WILL IN FACT ATTEND TO THE RAMPANT FRAUD, and IF IT WILL DEAL with the criminals who abuse public office, especially when faced with appropriate submissions and claims that will be delivered in due course. Visitors/readers are urged to read the article published in the London Evening Standard, as settled by the Rt. Hon. David Blunkett, Home Secretary in 2003
*Link from here to the article we reproduce in another webpage and consider "Why tolerate the arrogance of the legal circles who had and have the audacity to assert to the lawmakers that they, the lawmakers have nothing to do with the law"?
While there, above it, the explicit letter to ex-Minister, the Rt. Hon. Frank Field MP, delivered a few days earlier. ALL alleged victim-challengers who contacted Andrew Yiannides, by the time the letter was sent to the Minister, received copy of the letter just as they received copies of other letters submitted to government maintained Ministers and other official appointees to public office. Accessing the material pointed to from the letter (URLs) is of utmost importance. It should assist 'recognition of the citizen's rights at work', when called upon properly in truly democratic states. The above in 2003; there were other 'submissions' and among such civilised and, within the law, approaches by citizens that led to the right actions by governments, the explicit challenges when we set about exposing one of the most evil of alleged victims of the legal circles to have ever contacted us.

*Link from here to our explicit submissions to (a) the Prime Minister, (b) the Chancellor / Treasury, (c) and, the Home Secretary. We acted so after we had secured more than enough evidence about the parts of an alleged victim whose only interests were (i) the rewards under the table FOR KEEPING QUIET about the ORGANISED FRAUD THROUGH ABUSE OF THE COURTS' FACILITIES and (ii) her parts in blunt attempts that were intended to discredit the person she was sent along to mess about with, Mr Andrew Yiannides.

Access please the letter to the Home Secretary, the Rt. Hon. Jack Straw, in December 1998

*Link from here to the letter

& note the results evinced in the newspaper article (Hornsey Journal) also within days of the letter reaching its destination. Many the charlatans and stooges -lovers and 'promoters of the system as is'- on the job for decades; one and all acting as sold souls always do

*Link from here to the evidence we point to relative to the parts of one of a number of sold to the system fraudsters who were sent along / introduced to Andrew Yiannides by the managers / organisers of the LIPS crowd / mob..


   1.   [*Link from here to:- (a) an explicit affidavit and the challenges to:- (b) the Commander of Police at Haringey Council, for an insight in respect of the constructive frauds created through abuse of public office and gross misrepresentations / FRAUDULENT IN INTENT DEFAULTS BY OTHER PUBLIC SERVANTS & THE MEDIA BARONS THROUGH THE INTELLECTUAL PROSTITUTES THE BARONS RETAIN & MAINTAIN FOR SUCH SERVICES TO THE CREATORS & CONTROLLERS OF CORRUPT SOCIETIES & STATES]
   2.   Visitors, readers, victims and researchers are requested to access the page where we publish an explicit affidavit covering THE FACTS & THE REALITIES that created the pre-arranged & organised on demand through the invisible services on offer by followers of the most vile of works ever to have been presented to mankind, the sons of men on planet earth, by fraudsters and master-CRAFTsmen who misrepresent themselves as philanthropists who allegedly are concerned for people and the less fortunate. [*Link to the affidavit, images for the present, in due course in HTML for links to and from in order to benefit from THE TRUTH & THE REALITIES AS CREATED & MAINTAINED..... through CIUKU (Crimes Incorporated United Kingdom Unlimited) Enterprises]. 
   3.   *Link from here to a page where we publish evidence relevant to the element of abuse of the courts' processes, through inexcusable application to the courts. Such activities, simply intended to generate fraudulent awards to solicitors should be addressed as a matter of urgency by the government and persons who adopt the practice and engage in such activities if not indicted by the authorities, should be condemned as fraudsters by victims and readers of the evidence we point to, alike. We refer and point to the type of applications to the court that simply are intended (a) to generate costs awards to the legal circles.  The 'scenario and scripts by the creators of the productions, covered in the page where the link from this paragraph takes visitors establish and qualify it all. Readers and researchers could not possibly fail to note the fact that such applications (b) generate impressive productions in the courts - for the benefit of the uninitiated who are invited to the such - as in the instance pointed, the alleged victim-challenger in a recorded & transcribed telephone conversation he spoke of 'the way forward' and the type of application warranted (in his opinion) AFTER A CASE HAD BEEN STRUCK OUT. The reference to and use of an alleged expert -one of a number of persons who had been declared vexatious litigants and thereafter engaged and carried on engaging in similar theatrical productions.... with the two objectives covered in this paragraph]
   4.   xxx
   5.   xxx

Link to:-   Lord Chancellor's Dpt.    Judges Schooled on racial issues
Link to:- The CAMILA Project   h-r Home Page   Judges independent of, FREE to ignore The LAW
Link to:-  Typical Response from Lord Chancellor  The LAW   Frank Cunningham-case
SEARCH this site To family.uk-human-rights.org/ To List of Affiliated web-sites To List of Web-sites Where Evil Practices ARE Exposed

...Back to Home Page


The creator of this website was inviting victims to access URrights & join him there with other victims to expose & challenge abusers of trust & public office until the providers of the facilities >ning.com< introduced new terms and conditions for the provision of the facilities. Access from here and read of the imposed states by the brains behind ning.com and consider only one element "WHY OBSTRUCT & HINDER THE DOWNLOAD of the existing material at URrights.ning.com >the intellectual properties of the creator of that presence on the Internet and those who joined him there? Read below of the unacceptable conduct and behaviour by the reckless abusers of trust, who set out to obstruct and blackmail the creator of URrights.ning

Persons who are genuinely concerned and object to the ways they were / are being treated by alleged servants of the publicand the law >in any PSEUDOdemocracy, or whatever states / conditions they are subjected to< by abusers of public facilities and public office >as we cover in our web-pages< should contact webmaster@human-rights.org for information relevant to the creation of similar facilities for INFOrmation on URrights, for facilities for URrights EUrope and for a NETwork of URrights activists.

  • APOLOGIES to friends and persons who could not access URrights following the recent changes by the providers of the facility (ning.com) Andrew Yiannides created and used the portal to create the presence on the Internet for the group of victims / challengers who joined with him to expose and challenge the arrogant and blunt abuse of public services in all allegedly civilised societies > PSEUDODEMOCRACIES <.

  • The changes related to the introduction of charges for the facilities, included the facility for ning.com to archive the material at URrights; also the facility to download the archived material to the creator's system (computer) while the creator and his group of friends considered which of the level of charges and service the group was to adopt.

  • HOWEVER the creator, Andrew Yiannides, WAS UNABLE TO DOWNLOAD THE ARCHIVED MATERIAL and all attempts to engage the providers and their staff in reasonable explanation as to WHY THE FAILURES TO CONNECT / DOWNLOAD from the ning.com servers THE ARCHIVED MATERIAL, were contemptuously ignored.

  • Emails to the Publicity, to the Promotion, to the Public Relations, also to the Chief Executive's Office merited no response whatsoever from anyone acting for ning.com

  • In the circumstances Andrew will appreciate any information related to the problems covered above. Andrew will also appreciate any information relative to exchanges with or email postings, from ning.com to existing members.

  • EXISTING URrights members, victims of the legal system, victims of solicitors and the courts should access the updated pages at .org/solicitors.htm and .org/solfraud.htm by using the links from the list below.

Below pages where we expose known lovers of it all, users and maintenance engineers of the system as is

.org/1999dfax.htm .org/1ofmany.htm .org/2lipstalk.htm .org/4deceit.htm .org/absolute.htm .org/abusers.htm
.org/account4.htm .org/actors.htm .org/actors2.htm .org/adoko.htm .org/bankers.htm .org/beware.htm
.org/blunket1.htm .org/chaldep1.htm .org/confraud.htm .org/contract.htm .org/convicti.htm .org/courts.htm
.org/corruptcourts.htm .org/crimesin.htm .org/dreamers.htm .org/evesused.htm .org/evilones.htm .org/famfraud.htm
.org/govolso.htm .org/guesswhy.htm .org/len.htm .org/mauricek.htm .org/media.htm .org/solfraud.htm
.org/solicitors.htm .org/someplan.htm .org/someploy.htm .org/thefacts.htm .org/theproof.htm .org/thenerve.htm
.org/twisted.htm .org/uaccount.htm .org/ukmm.htm .org/uwatchit.htm .org/watchit1.htm .org/yourtax.htm
  • Every single person we name and expose in the above pages elected to ignore THEIR OBLIGATIONS TO REPORT (to 'the serfs' = 'the taxpayers'), THE ABUSERS OF PUBLIC OFFICE & PUBLIC FACILITIES. All were/are relying on the Intellectual Prostitutes, from within the media, to keep it all in the family closet.
  • All, as typical twin-tongue hypocrites carry on complaining about the media for failing to report & for suppressing the facts and the realities they allegdely reported to the hard of hearing, to the otherwise committed angels blowing their silent trumpets for decades, all ready and gearing to welcome the expansion of the New World Order.
  • Of such parts the contributions from and failings of the persons we name and expose, AS IF THEIR OWN SILENCE, THEIR FAILURES  & THEIR BLUNT OBSTRUCTIONS to the work and other actions by the creator of this website, Andrew Yiannides, treated by one and all as if non-existent with the exception when the wily Norman Scarth, set off to abuse the trust he was allowed to benefit from, while his parts and questionable activities / performance were under scrutiny, specifically after HE FAILED to publish the full transcript of the Court of Appeal hearing HE WAS ALLOWED TO RECORD* [*Link from here to the food for thought page created by Andrew Yiannides, in the first instance].
  • Not one ever bothered to address the issues we expose in the explicit page, despite the fact that we have been pointing all of our contacts, since May 1992, to it all.
  • Visitors, readers and researchers are urged / invited to access and read the letter which the Hon. Secretary of the Litigants In Person Society, Mr. Norman Scarth sent to the founder of human-rights, Mr. Andrew Yiannides, reproduced in the page .org/4deceit.htm* [*L]
  • The author's statements, such as 'what for and why seek additional assistance', thereby spelling out his parts as a lover of it all.
  • Common sense dictates, that he should have directed his request to his partners in deceptions aplenty, one & all engaging in fraudulent misrepresentations AND NOTED TO HAVE, WILFULLY, BEEN SUPPRESSING, FROM THE TAXPAYERS, THE FACTS OF LIFE RELATIVE TO THE RAMPANT ABUSE OF THE COURTS FACILITIES as the failure of all to co-operate as covered and pointed to at:- [*L]. One and all fallen to the facilities for fraud aplenty on the taxpayers and the corruption of illiterates in law, the conditioned victims of the legal circles & courts who fall to the blackmail element attached to the REWARD for keeping the realities away from the taxpayers; just like the media and the Ministers responsible for the application of long existing law to the criminal activities we cover in our pages, do.
  • All the while one and all were / are engaging in the scenarios we cover in the exclusive page, which page the author of the letter which Mr Norman Scarth sent to Andrew Yiannides, afforded us the opportunity to address the issue of the contributions of his partners and affiliates in fraud aplenty on the taxpayers; despite the reminder one and all, named in the new page simply shoved it all in the dark corners of their devoid of grey matter skulls, their perverted / corrupted mind(s)

On Sunday morning, the 19th September 2010, the Deputy Prime Minister, leader of the Liberal-Democrats in the course of the BBC TV politics programme, spoke of the coalition government's commitment to address the element of waste and fraud through the public services sector. We trust and hope that the elements we expose in our pages and the parts adopted by the conditioned victims of the legal circles, the persons who engage in PROMOTING & EXPANDING THE ONGOING CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUD ON THE TAXPAYERS, THROUGH ABUSE OF THE COURTS' FACILITIES, will be on the top of the list of government priorities.
Visitors, readers & researchers are urged to access the letters to Minister Frank Field [*L] after he had been directed by the Prime Minister to think/do the unthinkable.
Link also from here [*L] to the explicit letter to the Home Secretary in December 1998 with submissions arising out of the RAMPANT HOUSING BENEFIT FRAUD
On Tuesday 23rd November 2010, 'the Guardian' in its Comment & Debate page carried an article by Nick Clegg, the Deputy Prime Minister. In the evening of the same day the Deputy Prime Minister addressed a large audience at Kings place in respect of the government's changes on university students fees / loans.
Access from here the page where we reproduce an image of 'the Guardian' article & consider the simple fact that we, alone, have been asserting and proclaiming our objections to the theft of funds from the national budget leading to the ever-increasing annual deficit in the state's balance of payments.

ACCESS:  http://www.justice-uk.human-rights.org/ (For an important message at this Community-on-Line web-site) & thereafter,
Access also http://www.law.society.complaints.and.human-rights.org/ (Judge instigates Fraud On Tax Payers - he knows not the difference between 'imposed' & 'no undue influence'). APOLOGIES FOR THE DISAPPEARANCE OF THIS WEBSITE.It appears that the beneficiary of the work, both for applications to the courts in the United Kingdom and the submissions to the European Court for Human Rights* [*Link from here to the Statement of Facts submitted to the ECoHR], arranged with the providers of the free web space to erase the Intellectual Property of Andrew Yiannides, the founder of the human-rights Community-on-Line, without any reference to the creator of the website and owner of the Intellectual Property!
鼯font> Copyright subsists on all material in our web-site, owned by the authors of same.
Visitors can refer to these pages in any non commercial activity, so long as attribution is given as to source. License to use, for commercial or other specific use of the material, shall have been secured in writing first, from the owners of any property and material from these pages. No material shall be reproduced in any form and by any means without prior agreement and or license in writing from the copyright owners. The Press are invited to contact us if they wish to publish material in the Public Interest, As We Do.
For any problems or questions regarding this web-site contact:  webmaster